@@TheMagicofJava Take a look at the model designed for the Calabi Yau manifold. It may be shaped as a weird star with curves and stuff, but it is still tridimensional . Same for the Tesseract or whatever model. Our brains are stuck in a 3D reality. Trying to imagine a 4th dimension is just like imagining a new color.
It is (next to) impossible to enter the detailed world of string theory from the outside. Not from dogma / the central path of physics. I.e. the insane mathematical reduction of hard physical reality. Commendable effort! Deep thinking required.
Thank you. I try, but yes I soon get swamped with information that I am not sure if its entirely relevant. But I always try to find out enough not to engage in Scientism.
I am old and homeless ( stupid) but I was going to subtract the spectra not in a vacuum and just show pen 🖋 etched colorless lines across a backdrop. Kalusa Klien on a floral either, yet another higher ordered battling grid Only then, in my condition, did I realize that I would need to review wavelength, frequency based on available band width and factors leading up to emission and absorption color judgements: only yellow was blocked by cancelled vanished manifolds ruing the gorgeous geometric light show in one Ricci similar shape show participation in Utube theater. Some conceivable shape translators noticed count 11 was but a child of the grandmaster shapes of entanglement 22. They are able to trace unit by unit the return to topography utilizing topology. The Balmer and Lyman? I am in a emergency services hotel ) blackout lines can be pursued on astronomical congruence of the molecular playground we were given: the periodic table of far-out melody of the elements stripped of their binding energy to mass. Kinetic and potential energy became involved but I don't know why because as the Beatles sang you are going to carry that weight along time. And the Galien transformations to get this naked mass of weight to another spherically favored orb made for you and me to observe even without binoculars was examined in a tradeoff of events but acceleration was still necessary in SpaceX sacrifice and you know how that affected the nightmare of attempting calibrate all this machinery up against the frictional problem of the electron mass. The equipment was collectively big and the electrons mass would bring loss perhaps in the form of scatter $$ phenomena to the Tokamack's best attempts at lattice indestructible eruducible crucibles of motion consensus as opposed to ⚛ configurations that can enjoy motion in Helium very close to stable coldly frames that try to assist time in standing still because of the heartbreak of factors mass desires to decouple. When raw Occams razored a acceleration manifested from the hidden curls of relativity paying homage to its greatest of spheres even when the only evidence that could come to light of this Swartzchild Big Bang Theory ( favorite character Amy) could miss the point geometry..
It doesnt matter how cool and futuristic you design a system to explain multiple dimensions. It will always be tridimensional.
Would you like to explain?
@@TheMagicofJava Take a look at the model designed for the Calabi Yau manifold. It may be shaped as a weird star with curves and stuff, but it is still tridimensional . Same for the Tesseract or whatever model. Our brains are stuck in a 3D reality. Trying to imagine a 4th dimension is just like imagining a new color.
@@rodrigogier Neuroscience suggests that the 3D is an hallucination and really we are 2D.
It is (next to) impossible to enter the detailed world of string theory from the outside. Not from dogma / the central path of physics.
I.e. the insane mathematical reduction of hard physical reality. Commendable effort! Deep thinking required.
Thank you. I try, but yes I soon get swamped with information that I am not sure if its entirely relevant. But I always try to find out enough not to engage in Scientism.
Interesting
I am old and homeless ( stupid) but I was going to subtract the spectra not in a vacuum and just show pen 🖋 etched colorless lines across a backdrop. Kalusa Klien on a floral either, yet another higher ordered battling grid
Only then, in my condition, did I realize that I would need to review wavelength, frequency based on available band width and factors leading up to emission and absorption color judgements: only yellow was blocked by cancelled vanished manifolds ruing the gorgeous geometric light show in one Ricci similar shape show participation in Utube theater. Some conceivable shape translators noticed count 11 was but a child of the grandmaster shapes of entanglement 22. They are able to trace unit by unit the return to topography utilizing topology. The Balmer and Lyman? I am in a emergency services hotel ) blackout lines can be pursued on astronomical congruence of the molecular playground we were given: the periodic table of far-out melody of the elements stripped of their binding energy to mass. Kinetic and potential energy became involved but I don't know why because as the Beatles sang you are going to carry that weight along time. And the Galien transformations to get this naked mass of weight to another spherically favored orb made for you and me to observe even without binoculars was examined in a tradeoff of events but acceleration was still necessary in SpaceX sacrifice and you know how that affected the nightmare of attempting calibrate all this machinery up against the frictional problem of the electron mass. The equipment was collectively big and the electrons mass would bring loss perhaps in the form of scatter $$ phenomena to the Tokamack's best attempts at lattice indestructible eruducible crucibles of motion consensus as opposed to ⚛ configurations that can enjoy motion in Helium very close to stable coldly frames that try to assist time in standing still because of the heartbreak of factors mass desires to decouple. When raw Occams razored a acceleration manifested from the hidden curls of relativity paying homage to its greatest of spheres even when the only evidence that could come to light of this Swartzchild Big Bang Theory ( favorite character Amy) could miss the point geometry..