I think the best part of using the Arc series is that people on a budget can get started and then upgrade later to something more robust. It’s just nice to have another player in the game now.
I don't want to be an A-hole but rendering on "GPU HARDWARE" just this year alone has probably improved by 300% ~ 500% as far as speed is concerned. Software rendering (CPU) has dominated for the longest time but it wasn't that long ago it was the *ONLY* way to render. Now EVERYTHING can be done on the GPU! (even on the highest setting which, until recently, was NOT POSSIBLE). It's not night & day, it's the difference between 5 minutes vs a few seconds. I cannot imagine what Blackwell will bring to the table...
Consumer hardware rendering is not very precise yet, especially if you have multiple layers. It's prone to render issues. For transcoding plain video it works, but for more complex projects I wouldn't use it to export
how has it increased 300% this year?? Did some gpu released this year have media engines that are three times faster? I'm not aware of this. Given that the 40 series have the exact same decoders that 30 series do.
Key word is "probably"....so big assumption being made here. Because it really depends on what software you are using that will even take advantage of any improvements made to (i.e. GPU) hardware for the processing task (i.e. render)...that can only happen from firmware/software driver change, or improvements added with new hardware. Vegas Pro will GPU render H.264/HVEC with a RTX 3090 slower than VEGAS Pro on my older system with a RTX 2080.
2 pass GPU encoding... ops! btw packaging of the video itself is nothing. Effects such as stabilization and noise reduction slow down the encoding by about 100 times relative to real time; 1 minute takes 1.5 hours to render. Often they need not just a processor, but the speed of a single core. Still in 2024.
I upgraded in October 2023 from an old Intel i7 4790k with 32GB DDR3 Ram with a Nividia GTX 1070 & x6 SATA SSD's to a Intel i9 13900k, RTX 4070TI, 96GGB DDR5 Ram and x4 M.2/NVME SSD's and it flies with Adobe Premiere Pro with my Prores files!
@@ericcheah6528 Thank you mate. I'm paying for it now. Out of work filmmaker in the recession in the UK. Thankfully my filmmaking/editing keeps me sane!
Hello, my friend. Thank you for the video. I also edit in premiere. What upgrade would you recomend? I now have a 5600X + 32GB 3600 RAM + 6700XT Upgrade 1. 5900XT + 7900XTX (keep the MOBO and RAM) Upgrade 2. 9900X + 64GB 5600 RAM (keep the 6700XT)
How the heck is RTX2060 super faster than RTX3060 or even 4060ti in Premiere Pro? Can anybody explain this to me? I'm looking for an upgrade for my PC editing workstation, with R7 5700x (4,75ghz PBO), 48gb 3600mhz and RX570 4gb. I was thinking about RTX3060 but that graph makes me feel unsure. Thanks in advance, guys.
@@YukkinataI was in the same situation as you and I chose the Arc A750, but I returned it after 2 weeks of use. It had too much TDP, and there were some driver problems such as getting a black screen while browsing on the desktop or playing games. I bought the RTX 4060 later on. With DLSS3, everything is perfect. Adobe performance is way better than the A750. Power consumption decreased by half. Go for the 4060.
14900k + 4070ti super or 14700k + 4080super for video editing 4k 422 10bit in Davinci Resolve? I know this is a PR video but i just can't find answers to this anywhere lol 🙏
Intel still has a problem with drivers and it won't change anytime soon. I bought an arc a750 and the card can't handle programs like affinity or on1 photo raw 2024, the programs turn off by themselves. Intel cards may work well in games but not in photo video editing programs, the drivers are poorly developed and the improvements are very slow.
7700 XT or 4060 Ti (16gb) For Vid editing? Is it worth to drop the Money on 7700XT According to the charts u gave? (Even though ppl reccomend Nvdia Over AMD For Rendering) Please answer
RDNA 2 is a trash for video editing, i have a RTX 3060 and before, i had a RX 6600, man, is a TRASH! Premiere Pro is very slow and Davinci Resolve doesn't work very well...
@@Moesuito well... theres also a massive price difference. not to mention 6600 was not even made for anything other than gaming and making the assumption that the entire RDNA2 line up sucks. Its just dumb, although a good way to show your ignorance.
Great video. How about using 2 gpus such as the Intel Arc a770s? with i9 14900, with quicksync working from igpu as well? Would that be even better? Cheers
Fraid so. Looked into this and Quicksync with an Intel CPU works, but not two GPUs. Kinda feels like it could be done but fixing the drivers is probably a higher priority
What about running 2 gpu’s? One intel and one amd? Like a a580 and a rx580? I’m building a setup right now. Z690 ace, 64g fury beast, fire cuda 530 ois, 13500 cpu.
@@wrayr I ended up getting a rx580 for a temporary filler. I have been editing my next video on adobe premiere pro (paid) and it’s surprisingly without any issues so far.
Arc A770 in my test is capable of AV1 Exporting in Davinci Resolve, smaller video files and faster rendering. My 4070 super does NOT have a AV1 exporting option only H.264/265. These tests were done in the free version of Davinci Resolve, the paid $295 studio version has AV1 exporting for both nvidia and Intel. HIGHLY recommend intel if you are serious about video editing on a budget. For example my 4070 super is 2x faster in game then my A770 but costs 2x MSRP, combined with the fact that it renders SLOWER then an Arc A770 unless you pay $295 more this making it 3x more expensive for very similiar rendering performance. Wild right, would love to here your input.
Thanks for the video, thanks for the hard work...Sorry but I am still very confused...The score of the cards still cannot explain a lot of issue, for example, the performance in Premier Pro is about the loading time of GPU/CPU effects; the export time of different version of video; how about the H265 playback, is it fast enough during editing; how much bandwidth and how much Vram we actually need to edit the video shoot in 4k by most of the mirrorless cameras? I get the answer before, it is the 4060ti 16g. Now I am confused again, as the overall score you get for 4060ti 16g sometimes even worse than 2060super...Is there any cards around 300-400 dollars perfect for 4k video editing???
can we get a follow up to this using Premiere Pro v25? It might be using the hardware differently with the new Intel Ultra CPUs especially! Do you think that's a good idea?
Would there be a benefit to running an A770 with a 14700k? Does the a770 decode/encode h.264 as well? Or does that playback on the cpu because my 14700k can't decode it with the iGPU
Yes. The gpu inside 14700k will help in several tasks, such as video encoding, you would see significant boost of performance when paring Intel CPU&GPU together. This is called Intel Deep Link.
Been thinking of a Ryzen 7 5700x partnered with a RTX 4060 Ti (16gb). Is it enough for DaVinci with edits that are more catered on motion graphics and typographies? Like it doesn't have a laggy playback or even crashing
What do you think about RX 6700 XT for editing work (no 3D stuff)? 3060 and 4060 was my go too but i found out that i can get an 6700 xt for less than 4060 and overall 6700 xt is better than 4060 also between 3060 and 6700 xt there is about 30 dollars difference with 6700 xt being the expensive one.
So the XT 7900GRE would be a good choice for working with Adobe Premiere PRO and After Effects ?! Because the next choice is 4070Ti Super, but the price is much higher, it seems too high...
Thanks for the vid, all the bnechmark are about export speed, what about the timeline response? or playback lag? or the ability of edit without proxies? can you give me an idea of how you can improve that?
AMD has released ROCm 6 on 7900 xtx, xt & GRE. Can you make a video talking in detail about how this could be helpful for content creators across the board . BTW I love all your videos and they add a lot of value to my purchase decisions. So keep up the good work. 👍 💯
I was searching the arc a580 at 13:26 but could not find it. Then he showed the chart and i was blown away. That a580 is on top of the chart, before 4090 and 7900 🤯🤯
Could you possibly do a comparison of the different GPU's and the AI features in Photoshop and Lightroom? Denoise is a new feature in lightroom that is being used heavily now and there's no info on how all these cards perform. Puget bench does not benchmark the AI stuff.
I went into this video hoping to hear that the 4070 would be a great middle of the road card and left thinking, how quick can I get my hands on an ARC GPU. Thanks!
@theTechNotice Codecs ? I gotta do some homework.im building a new PC. 1500-2300 build from your video. I'm knowledgeable but I'm a music guy, just getting into video editing. I wanna game alittle as well. I had the 4070 ti super in my Cart until I seen this vid. Thank you for answering me. I don't wanna make a GPU mistake
Please help, I am about to buy a PC to use ADOBE PREMIER, ADOBE AFTER EFFECT AND A FEW TIMES BLENDER, what configuration do you recommend? core i9 14900k + arc a770 16gb, or i9 14900k + 4060 ti 16gb? I appreciate your answers
🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 00:00 *🖥️ Choix des GPUs pour l'édition vidéo* - Introduction sur les meilleurs GPUs pour Premiere Pro, - Benchmarks réalisés avec diverses marques de GPUs. 00:45 *💡 Benchmark et méthodologie* - Présentation des benchmarks des différents GPUs, - Cavet sur les anciennes versions de Premiere Pro et améliorations de performance des GPUs Arc d'Intel. 03:01 *🔍 Différences entre les versions de logiciels* - Impact des nouvelles versions de logiciels sur la performance des Arc, - Comparaison détaillée des résultats de benchmarks entre anciennes et nouvelles versions de logiciels. 04:08 *📊 Résultats des scores globaux étendus et standards* - Comparaison des performances des cartes Nvidia, AMD et Intel, - Description des différences de performance sur les tests codécs longs GOP et standard. 07:21 *🎶 Présentation du sponsor Artlist* - Offre de licences musicales et autres contenus créatifs, - Avantages de l'utilisation d'Artlist pour les créateurs. 09:01 *🏆 Performance des AMD et impact sur la qualité* - Supériorité d'AMD dans les scores GOP longs mais avec des limitations sur la qualité du codec, - Recommandations sur l'augmentation du bitrate pour compenser la qualité des encoders AMD. 12:01 *🔧 Enjeux des scores intraframe et RAW* - Performances des cartes Intel Arc en scores intraframe, - Positionnement des cartes Nvidia pour les décodages RAW. 15:01 *⚙️ Effets GPU et importance du VRAM* - GPU et leur impact limité sur les effets dans Premiere Pro, - Impact du VRAM sur les performances globales sous des charges de travail complexes. 20:44 *🛠️ Construction PC & Conclusion* - Importance de choisir le bon GPU selon son budget et ses besoins, - Suggestions de GPU pour les amateurs et professionnels de l'édition vidéo. Made with HARPA AI
Not true. Watch the video and you'll see the A770 does really well in several areas. Just depends on what you want to do. Long GOP it's on a par with a 4090!!! Premiere Pro does most of its work with the CPU.
Bro i am using Intel Arc A750 my project Render Its using Cpu 90 to 100 and Gpu using 20% H.264 format i don't know what problem and Not Showing Av1 encoding I am using PR 2023 and Check 2024 not available
Is there the possibility of a bottleneck when it comes to the RAW std and ext results as they all seem to be incredibly similar especially when factorig in RED 4k / 8K fps? On the PB website when comparing results for 0.98 + 23.6 and looking at the RED 4k / 8K results a 3050 is around 65fps for both and a 4090 is around 68 fps. When changing to PP 24 a 3080 can he 20fps higher averaging 85fps and a 4060 with an 11600K is 78fps on PB 1.0 / PP24.
This guy knows what he’s doing in terms of using hardware for content creation. I just wish AMD watched this particular gpu review , Radeon gpu’s is always on the bottom in terms of video coding quality on this channel which is a bad thing for AMD seriously.
Best gpu? One u got ! Stop comparing no one or just few here edit pro so export render is the last thing to be worry ....real time full or 1/2 preview is what matter the most for me and cause I'm lazy to upgrade from 8700k I have preview set on 1/8 😅 otherwise this test is wow thanks
So you cost me $350 on a Zotac card just a bit over a month ago as your recommeded a 3060 for Lightroom and Photoshop users, and yet it doesnt even show up for Premier which is something that most image editors do dable in, and gaining use. Yet there are a couple cards that would have done better AND do Premier rather well. So why the 3060?? When its about $350 for the Zotac??
so 1 year ago. This channel launched a video about instability issues with AMD GPU namely the 7900xt. So what is the point of benchmarking these wide array of GPU's without addressing stability problems between these GPU's? Most professional content/video editors will choose stability over raw performance on paper. Nothing is worse than random crashing and losing hours of work. Just feels like a pointless video without actually testing out these GPU's in an actual production environment and not just running benchmarking tests.......
I had serious instability issues with the 6900xt (had a faulty unit) and recently upgraded to the 1070ti super (ProArt), and it is like night and day. Not a single crash and overclocks flawlessly.
I need to edit 4k video what gpu do I need here’s my set up Intel Core i7-14700K - Core i7 14th Gen 20-Core (8P+12E) LGA 1700 G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 64GB (2 x 32GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR4 3200 MSI PRO Z790-P WIFI LGA 1700 Intel Z790 SATA 6Gb/s DDR4 ATX Motherboard (55) 1tb Samsung ssd 1 tb 980 pro ssd
COULD YOU PLEASE HEPL ME OUT!!!!! As I am Using intel i7 processor 8th gen with Amd Radeon Rx 580 8 gb card but my premiere Pro Does'nt USe MY GPU It just uses the CPU to 100% While Rendering And 1 to 2% Gpu is Used in Task Manager Performance i have Tried Everything Changed my settings To open cl and nothing is helping me out If you can help me please tell me Its solution thanks
I have a 6900xt. I have lkeft over parts from my old build that can be used for my wifes new editing video. 5950x, 32gb ram, and need a new MOBO, PSU, Tower. IO just need a GPU for her as I kept my 6900xt for my rig.
For Blender Nvidia cards show waaay higer performance by default. And Adobe After effect doesn't depend too much on GPU (except Cinema 4D) so you can't go wrong with any of modern cards.
You doing soo damn good job man, i just upgraded my i7 4790 and if i wouldn't find your channel i would propably pick intel F version, thanks to you i have choose i5 13600k and timeline is soo fast like ferrari, soo smooth, now time to change my gtx 1070 and thought about rtx 3070 but after watching this video im considering about a770, im little disappointed that 3070 is missing in this comparison and shocked that 3060 and even 3080 can be below 3050 which is just made for a screen displayer, or this higher position of older 2060S. Now i really dont know what to do :D But anyway thanks for your work. Btw. Can i get this test 1:1 also as benchmark for After Effects? Regards
I don't really get this, if you can't tell by looking at it, why is the encoding better on the intel? Is there problems with artifacts or anything with color correction? If not? Exactly how is it better and does it even matter? I never trust a "trust me bro" argument, that's definitely for amateurs and I did not expect that from this channel. I heard that both Intel and to a lesser degree Nvidia have higher compression rate yielding same quality at a smaller file-size but that's only important if you have constraints on your storage, right? But if you get good enough visual fidelity with let's say an RX 7800 XT it will preform faster or on par with the 4 times more expensive 4090? Shouldn't this card paired with a good intel cpu (with Quick Sync) be one of the best compromises between speed, cost and quality, according to your numbers?
This is not a good practice. You are recommending GPUs by their benchmark! Intel Arc are still not a good choice for productivity. You should use these gpu and give the feedback. Don’t give us false information. It is not a good practice.
Also when amd just launched 7000 series gpu you talked about amd gpu having problem that makes pc restart itself automatically several times while there was no issues with nividia but now you didn't talked about it. If it still happens or not. You could have showcased how driver updates improved thing on amd side like you did for intel arc gpu in this video.
Bro, the day AMD gets their shit together in Blender and Redshift, I will be switching to them. I have no delusions about Nvidia not overcharging for their GPUs compared to the competition, but for the time being, there are categories of GPUs right now that simply only Nvidia fills up so they essentially have no competition in that regard.
Most people, even nvidia fanboys don't say amd sucks for productivity. They are usually talking about the nvenc encoders and how they prefer using them over amd's encoders. Nothing wrong with either encoder.
![Why Your Creator PC Bottlenecks! 👉 How to find & FIX the problem? [Video, Photo & 3D]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/s2O7P7Bmvg8/mqdefault.jpg)
I think the best part of using the Arc series is that people on a budget can get started and then upgrade later to something more robust. It’s just nice to have another player in the game now.
I don't want to be an A-hole but rendering on "GPU HARDWARE" just this year alone has probably improved by 300% ~ 500% as far as speed is concerned. Software rendering (CPU) has dominated for the longest time but it wasn't that long ago it was the *ONLY* way to render. Now EVERYTHING can be done on the GPU! (even on the highest setting which, until recently, was NOT POSSIBLE). It's not night & day, it's the difference between 5 minutes vs a few seconds. I cannot imagine what Blackwell will bring to the table...
Consumer hardware rendering is not very precise yet, especially if you have multiple layers. It's prone to render issues. For transcoding plain video it works, but for more complex projects I wouldn't use it to export
Wrong @@ccc3
how has it increased 300% this year?? Did some gpu released this year have media engines that are three times faster? I'm not aware of this. Given that the 40 series have the exact same decoders that 30 series do.
Key word is "probably"....so big assumption being made here.
Because it really depends on what software you are using that will even take advantage of any improvements made to (i.e. GPU) hardware for the processing task (i.e. render)...that can only happen from firmware/software driver change, or improvements added with new hardware.
Vegas Pro will GPU render H.264/HVEC with a RTX 3090 slower than VEGAS Pro on my older system with a RTX 2080.
2 pass GPU encoding... ops!
btw packaging of the video itself is nothing. Effects such as stabilization and noise reduction slow down the encoding by about 100 times relative to real time; 1 minute takes 1.5 hours to render. Often they need not just a processor, but the speed of a single core. Still in 2024.
I upgraded in October 2023 from an old Intel i7 4790k with 32GB DDR3 Ram with a Nividia GTX 1070 & x6 SATA SSD's to a Intel i9 13900k, RTX 4070TI, 96GGB DDR5 Ram and x4 M.2/NVME SSD's and it flies with Adobe Premiere Pro with my Prores files!
Crazy huge upgrade 💥. Congrats mate
That's like many X the performance.
@@theTechNotice Thank you mate. Love your channel. I can't wait to export my latest feature documentary which is shot in prores 422 10bit.
@@ericcheah6528 Thank you mate. I'm paying for it now. Out of work filmmaker in the recession in the UK. Thankfully my filmmaking/editing keeps me sane!
🔥
Are you planning the same video for davinci? Would love to see that
Yes, stay tuned! :)
Thanks man. @@theTechNotice
I am happy with my 4090 rendering all types of codec in more than an hour of 8K videos without a sweat.
glad to hear! :)
Hello, my friend. Thank you for the video. I also edit in premiere. What upgrade would you recomend?
I now have a 5600X + 32GB 3600 RAM + 6700XT
Upgrade 1.
5900XT + 7900XTX (keep the MOBO and RAM)
Upgrade 2.
9900X + 64GB 5600 RAM (keep the 6700XT)
How the heck is RTX2060 super faster than RTX3060 or even 4060ti in Premiere Pro? Can anybody explain this to me?
I'm looking for an upgrade for my PC editing workstation, with R7 5700x (4,75ghz PBO), 48gb 3600mhz and RX570 4gb. I was thinking about RTX3060 but that graph makes me feel unsure. Thanks in advance, guys.
same question please explain
Memory bus.
Bus bandwidth, helps with rendering more intensive stuff. Vram matters but bus width and bandwidth matters just as much lol.
I have quite similar spec as yours, R7 3700X, RX 570 8GB, thinking of upgrading between 2060S, 3060 and A750. May I know what did you pick?
@@YukkinataI was in the same situation as you and I chose the Arc A750, but I returned it after 2 weeks of use. It had too much TDP, and there were some driver problems such as getting a black screen while browsing on the desktop or playing games. I bought the RTX 4060 later on. With DLSS3, everything is perfect. Adobe performance is way better than the A750. Power consumption decreased by half. Go for the 4060.
very nice, but where is your 7900GRE
TN, can you compare exported video quality, is there any difference between Nvidia, AMD and Intel GPU, both for Premiere and DaVinci?
It's negligible to the compression TH-cam is going to do. No need to worry about it.
@@YaYousef5 ok, but just to compare for the same bitrate...
Wow, that was a lot of work! Thanks😊
You're welcome 😊
14900k + 4070ti super or 14700k + 4080super for video editing 4k 422 10bit in Davinci Resolve? I know this is a PR video but i just can't find answers to this anywhere lol 🙏
Davinci coming up, but I'd go with i9 and ti super :)
@@theTechNotice thank you for the response! I look forward to the video 🙌🏽
if you are using h264 codec then non of the card will help you decoding but with h265 the igpu from from 14th gen will make the different
Intel still has a problem with drivers and it won't change anytime soon. I bought an arc a750 and the card can't handle programs like affinity or on1 photo raw 2024, the programs turn off by themselves. Intel cards may work well in games but not in photo video editing programs, the drivers are poorly developed and the improvements are very slow.
7700 XT or 4060 Ti (16gb) For Vid editing? Is it worth to drop the Money on 7700XT According to the charts u gave? (Even though ppl reccomend Nvdia Over AMD For Rendering)
Please answer
whats the best GPU for Davinci Studio?
Coming up!
We need you to Benchmark the RDNA 1 & 2 GPU Lauri. Are those products worth picking over Turing & Ampere GPU.
only gpus worth getting for videoediting are >RDNA and ampere and up
RDNA 2 is a trash for video editing, i have a RTX 3060 and before, i had a RX 6600, man, is a TRASH! Premiere Pro is very slow and Davinci Resolve doesn't work very well...
@@Moesuito well... theres also a massive price difference. not to mention 6600 was not even made for anything other than gaming and making the assumption that the entire RDNA2 line up sucks. Its just dumb, although a good way to show your ignorance.
@@rando3962 the rtx 3060 & RX 6600 have the Same msrp lol. Rdna 2 would absolutely be a disastrous generation if there's no price cut.
😮
Great video. How about using 2 gpus such as the Intel Arc a770s? with i9 14900, with quicksync working from igpu as well? Would that be even better? Cheers
dual ARC is not officially supported
😮
Fraid so. Looked into this and Quicksync with an Intel CPU works, but not two GPUs. Kinda feels like it could be done but fixing the drivers is probably a higher priority
What about running 2 gpu’s? One intel and one amd? Like a a580 and a rx580? I’m building a setup right now. Z690 ace, 64g fury beast, fire cuda 530 ois, 13500 cpu.
In my experience 2 different brand dGPUs don't work well together....
@@theTechNotice appreciate your reply. I just didn’t know if they could compliment each other. This is my first build. Love the content!
Looking a Puget benchmarks it looks like this happens a lot
@@wrayr I ended up getting a rx580 for a temporary filler. I have been editing my next video on adobe premiere pro (paid) and it’s surprisingly without any issues so far.
@@BrokeVetGarage respect
What’s your opinion on the GTX 770ti 4GB for premiere pro? I know it’s old but it’s cheap ?
Should we focus on Vram or Performance
So, should I buy A770 insted of RTX 3060 for Premiere pro? It dosen't have any compatibility issues anymore?
nope, all good!
Arc A770 in my test is capable of AV1 Exporting in Davinci Resolve, smaller video files and faster rendering. My 4070 super does NOT have a AV1 exporting option only H.264/265. These tests were done in the free version of Davinci Resolve, the paid $295 studio version has AV1 exporting for both nvidia and Intel. HIGHLY recommend intel if you are serious about video editing on a budget. For example my 4070 super is 2x faster in game then my A770 but costs 2x MSRP, combined with the fact that it renders SLOWER then an Arc A770 unless you pay $295 more this making it 3x more expensive for very similiar rendering performance.
Wild right, would love to here your input.
*than
interesting to see 580 here. did this still had any driver issues anymore?
Thanks for the video, thanks for the hard work...Sorry but I am still very confused...The score of the cards still cannot explain a lot of issue, for example, the performance in Premier Pro is about the loading time of GPU/CPU effects; the export time of different version of video; how about the H265 playback, is it fast enough during editing; how much bandwidth and how much Vram we actually need to edit the video shoot in 4k by most of the mirrorless cameras? I get the answer before, it is the 4060ti 16g. Now I am confused again, as the overall score you get for 4060ti 16g sometimes even worse than 2060super...Is there any cards around 300-400 dollars perfect for 4k video editing???
can we get a follow up to this using Premiere Pro v25? It might be using the hardware differently with the new Intel Ultra CPUs especially! Do you think that's a good idea?
Deja vu.
Great timing as I’m looking to purchase a new GPU. Currently have my eyes on ASUS ProArt GeForce 4070 Ti Super.
Thank you Lauri.
great choice! :)
@@theTechNotice - Most/all of my component choices have been based on your recommendations my friend. 🙏🏻
Just get the cheapest 7900xtx
👏
4070 super or 3080ti for premiere and after effects?
4070 super - besides higher performance it will also be a great future proof.
4070ti super
Allright now lemme watch to the end this time please 😅
haha ! :)
Would there be a benefit to running an A770 with a 14700k? Does the a770 decode/encode h.264 as well? Or does that playback on the cpu because my 14700k can't decode it with the iGPU
Idk I’m about to go for it
Yes. The gpu inside 14700k will help in several tasks, such as video encoding, you would see significant boost of performance when paring Intel CPU&GPU together. This is called Intel Deep Link.
Been thinking of a Ryzen 7 5700x partnered with a RTX 4060 Ti (16gb). Is it enough for DaVinci with edits that are more catered on motion graphics and typographies? Like it doesn't have a laggy playback or even crashing
What do you think about RX 6700 XT for editing work (no 3D stuff)?
3060 and 4060 was my go too but i found out that i can get an 6700 xt for less than 4060 and overall 6700 xt is better than 4060 also between 3060 and 6700 xt there is about 30 dollars difference with 6700 xt being the expensive one.
Can you use two different cards and use the best of them in the premiere?
not sure what you mean?
@@theTechNotice I think he means 2 gpus in a system and use the better of the 2 to render.
So the XT 7900GRE would be a good choice for working with Adobe Premiere PRO and After Effects ?! Because the next choice is 4070Ti Super, but the price is much higher, it seems too high...
do you every try video editing using AMD? is it good?
Thanks for the vid, all the bnechmark are about export speed, what about the timeline response? or playback lag? or the ability of edit without proxies? can you give me an idea of how you can improve that?
Wondering the same, did you find something? I'm gonna buy a770 in 2 days
AMD has released ROCm 6 on 7900 xtx, xt & GRE. Can you make a video talking in detail about how this could be helpful for content creators across the board . BTW I love all your videos and they add a lot of value to my purchase decisions. So keep up the good work. 👍 💯
'Also needs to test DR w/ this card (and compare to Nvidia) - & test in Blender 4.1 w/ ROCm 6 + HIP-RT - on 7900 xtx. :)
I was searching the arc a580 at 13:26 but could not find it.
Then he showed the chart and i was blown away. That a580 is on top of the chart, before 4090 and 7900 🤯🤯
Could you possibly do a comparison of the different GPU's and the AI features in Photoshop and Lightroom? Denoise is a new feature in lightroom that is being used heavily now and there's no info on how all these cards perform. Puget bench does not benchmark the AI stuff.
Working on it, not quite as straight forward :)
I wish if u add exporting results to the list too
The codecs are encoding (exporting) and decoding FYI :)
I went into this video hoping to hear that the 4070 would be a great middle of the road card and left thinking, how quick can I get my hands on an ARC GPU. Thanks!
:)
Wait so is it actually better to convert an h264 video to raw and edit that way? It seems like all systems usually get higher RAW scores...
I miss the GTX 1080 ti in this roundup. I still use that card and it is a beast.
what are the caveats for the 3050 6gb? (i believe you are using a 3050 8gb,) for a budget 1080p editing build
lookup a P 4000/5000, might be better at that job, and cheaper
Good video and have a good day
@Thetechnotice so ARC over 4070 Super ???
Depends on your codecs, but longGOP yes :)
@theTechNotice Codecs ? I gotta do some homework.im building a new PC. 1500-2300 build from your video. I'm knowledgeable but I'm a music guy, just getting into video editing. I wanna game alittle as well. I had the 4070 ti super in my Cart until I seen this vid. Thank you for answering me. I don't wanna make a GPU mistake
I’m on a 4070 ti super/7800x3d on davinci studio and my gpu acceleration does all the work for it
Nice nice, thank you 🙂
Welcome 😊
@@theTechNoticewhat about 6750gre 12gb + 7500f or 13400 for video editing....is this good combination or not....
Please help, I am about to buy a PC to use ADOBE PREMIER, ADOBE AFTER EFFECT AND A FEW TIMES BLENDER, what configuration do you recommend? core i9 14900k + arc a770 16gb, or i9 14900k + 4060 ti 16gb?
I appreciate your answers
Go for 4070super instead
@@DipaceGirior 3090?
🎯 Key points for quick navigation:
00:00 *🖥️ Choix des GPUs pour l'édition vidéo*
- Introduction sur les meilleurs GPUs pour Premiere Pro,
- Benchmarks réalisés avec diverses marques de GPUs.
00:45 *💡 Benchmark et méthodologie*
- Présentation des benchmarks des différents GPUs,
- Cavet sur les anciennes versions de Premiere Pro et améliorations de performance des GPUs Arc d'Intel.
03:01 *🔍 Différences entre les versions de logiciels*
- Impact des nouvelles versions de logiciels sur la performance des Arc,
- Comparaison détaillée des résultats de benchmarks entre anciennes et nouvelles versions de logiciels.
04:08 *📊 Résultats des scores globaux étendus et standards*
- Comparaison des performances des cartes Nvidia, AMD et Intel,
- Description des différences de performance sur les tests codécs longs GOP et standard.
07:21 *🎶 Présentation du sponsor Artlist*
- Offre de licences musicales et autres contenus créatifs,
- Avantages de l'utilisation d'Artlist pour les créateurs.
09:01 *🏆 Performance des AMD et impact sur la qualité*
- Supériorité d'AMD dans les scores GOP longs mais avec des limitations sur la qualité du codec,
- Recommandations sur l'augmentation du bitrate pour compenser la qualité des encoders AMD.
12:01 *🔧 Enjeux des scores intraframe et RAW*
- Performances des cartes Intel Arc en scores intraframe,
- Positionnement des cartes Nvidia pour les décodages RAW.
15:01 *⚙️ Effets GPU et importance du VRAM*
- GPU et leur impact limité sur les effets dans Premiere Pro,
- Impact du VRAM sur les performances globales sous des charges de travail complexes.
20:44 *🛠️ Construction PC & Conclusion*
- Importance de choisir le bon GPU selon son budget et ses besoins,
- Suggestions de GPU pour les amateurs et professionnels de l'édition vidéo.
Made with HARPA AI
i7 14700k + arc a770 its good combo foe video editing ? or bottleneck?
That's a crazy good CPU, you need a much much better GPU, starting with something like 3090, 3090ti or 4070ti Super...
Not true. Watch the video and you'll see the A770 does really well in several areas. Just depends on what you want to do. Long GOP it's on a par with a 4090!!!
Premiere Pro does most of its work with the CPU.
@@wrayr Hey, I'm planning on getting the same combo. How did it go for you?
@@AiTalesYT I had to give up on the Arc A770. Way too many issues. Ended up biting the bullet and buying a Proart RTX 4070 Ti Super instead.
Hye sir can i go for rtx 3060 for 4k video editing ??
Biased opinion......Intel ??nvidia is goat
Should I buy rtx 4060 8gb for motion graphics and video editing
Bro i am using Intel Arc A750 my project Render Its using Cpu 90 to 100 and Gpu using 20% H.264 format i don't know what problem and Not Showing Av1 encoding I am using PR 2023 and Check 2024 not available
I got the 4070 TI SUPER and I couldn't be more happier!
Excellent Details.
Is an A750 enough for editing 1080 videos or should i go for an a770? Last one is like 400 dlls in my country😢
A750 is fine
Yes, perfectly fine!
Are you doing a Davinci video??
Yes, coming 2nd part of April :)
Is there the possibility of a bottleneck when it comes to the RAW std and ext results as they all seem to be incredibly similar especially when factorig in RED 4k / 8K fps? On the PB website when comparing results for 0.98 + 23.6 and looking at the RED 4k / 8K results a 3050 is around 65fps for both and a 4090 is around 68 fps. When changing to PP 24 a 3080 can he 20fps higher averaging 85fps and a 4060 with an 11600K is 78fps on PB 1.0 / PP24.
This guy knows what he’s doing in terms of using hardware for content creation. I just wish AMD watched this particular gpu review , Radeon gpu’s is always on the bottom in terms of video coding quality on this channel which is a bad thing for AMD seriously.
Best gpu? One u got ! Stop comparing no one or just few here edit pro so export render is the last thing to be worry ....real time full or 1/2 preview is what matter the most for me and cause I'm lazy to upgrade from 8700k I have preview set on 1/8 😅 otherwise this test is wow thanks
So you cost me $350 on a Zotac card just a bit over a month ago as your recommeded a 3060 for Lightroom and Photoshop users, and yet it doesnt even show up for Premier which is something that most image editors do dable in, and gaining use. Yet there are a couple cards that would have done better AND do Premier rather well. So why the 3060?? When its about $350 for the Zotac??
so 1 year ago. This channel launched a video about instability issues with AMD GPU namely the 7900xt. So what is the point of benchmarking these wide array of GPU's without addressing stability problems between these GPU's? Most professional content/video editors will choose stability over raw performance on paper. Nothing is worse than random crashing and losing hours of work. Just feels like a pointless video without actually testing out these GPU's in an actual production environment and not just running benchmarking tests.......
they fixed it
I had serious instability issues with the 6900xt (had a faulty unit) and recently upgraded to the 1070ti super (ProArt), and it is like night and day. Not a single crash and overclocks flawlessly.
I need to edit 4k video what gpu do I need here’s my set up
Intel Core i7-14700K - Core i7 14th Gen 20-Core (8P+12E) LGA 1700
G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 64GB (2 x 32GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR4 3200
MSI PRO Z790-P WIFI LGA 1700 Intel Z790 SATA 6Gb/s DDR4 ATX Motherboard
(55)
1tb Samsung ssd
1 tb 980 pro ssd
pretty much any GPU will do :)
@@theTechNotice didn’t realize asking a genuine question would get a troll answer cool man
A770 looks insane
Great work 👏
:)
Wait wait :D 2060 super is beating the 3080?
Really appreciate it bud. Thanks
No problem 👍
COULD YOU PLEASE HEPL ME OUT!!!!!
As I am Using intel i7 processor 8th gen with Amd Radeon Rx 580 8 gb card but my premiere Pro Does'nt USe MY GPU
It just uses the CPU to 100% While Rendering And 1 to 2% Gpu is Used in Task Manager Performance
i have Tried Everything Changed my settings To open cl and nothing is helping me out
If you can help me please tell me Its solution
thanks
I have a 6900xt. I have lkeft over parts from my old build that can be used for my wifes new editing video. 5950x, 32gb ram, and need a new MOBO, PSU, Tower. IO just need a GPU for her as I kept my 6900xt for my rig.
i need to upgrade my gtx 970. could i move to arc a580 or rtx 4060 ? i have very tight budget
for PP? Go ARC!
for adobe family
thank you. i will try arc a580
Probably should've just added "projected Intel Arc" performance entries to the graphs for ease of understanding.
Really cramped list though.
Yeah, could've....
How dose arc A750 perform on Blander and After effect?
For Blender Nvidia cards show waaay higer performance by default. And Adobe After effect doesn't depend too much on GPU (except Cinema 4D) so you can't go wrong with any of modern cards.
useless...just spewing numbers
You doing soo damn good job man, i just upgraded my i7 4790 and if i wouldn't find your channel i would propably pick intel F version, thanks to you i have choose i5 13600k and timeline is soo fast like ferrari, soo smooth, now time to change my gtx 1070 and thought about rtx 3070 but after watching this video im considering about a770, im little disappointed that 3070 is missing in this comparison and shocked that 3060 and even 3080 can be below 3050 which is just made for a screen displayer, or this higher position of older 2060S.
Now i really dont know what to do :D
But anyway thanks for your work.
Btw. Can i get this test 1:1 also as benchmark for After Effects?
Regards
Smooth operatoooor... smoooth... operatoooor...
lookin' fresh 💈
Hola y gracias por el video. En estas comparativas, nadie habla del rendimiento en lightroom. saludos
In Photoshop or/and Lightroom CPU handles the majority of processing so having an advanced GPU is not so important.
what about after effects sir. i want to use 3d camera mostly or little more 3d
Now another one for Davinci Resolve (free and studio version comparisons as well)
Especially, since software versions change and there's new releases recently?
Adobe Premiere Pro is a tool for tools, not content creators.
😂😂😂
Hard to find any review about Asus ProArt 4080 Super, but also not there
I'll do one, hold on :)
@@theTechNotice Nice, I really curious about GPU/hotspot/memory temp :D And that is black (even the heat-sink) without RGB :D
I'd just go for an xtx tbh
I don't really get this, if you can't tell by looking at it, why is the encoding better on the intel? Is there problems with artifacts or anything with color correction? If not? Exactly how is it better and does it even matter? I never trust a "trust me bro" argument, that's definitely for amateurs and I did not expect that from this channel. I heard that both Intel and to a lesser degree Nvidia have higher compression rate yielding same quality at a smaller file-size but that's only important if you have constraints on your storage, right? But if you get good enough visual fidelity with let's say an RX 7800 XT it will preform faster or on par with the 4 times more expensive 4090? Shouldn't this card paired with a good intel cpu (with Quick Sync) be one of the best compromises between speed, cost and quality, according to your numbers?
Would you ever switch to AMD for your workflow? you probably mostly use H265 ect
Just got a 4090
where's the rtx 3070?
160$ RTX 2060 Super still works like a charm...
👍
Best gpu is which you can afford
Can someone tell me why on earth this arc a580 performs better than a770 😑
newer driver! A770 is better, just the point of arc drivers!
Lots of driver updates. Plus using the v24 Premiere Pro (or beta) is a real surprise!
used 3090 for 600+/- USD is the best IMHO
Nope, will not get any thing that is intel.
Why?
bro yuh privatised this video a while ago
I had a mistake in it and fixed it :)
@@theTechNotice okay 👌
You'd do better if your arguments against AMD weren't so subjective.
No 3080 ti?
This is not a good practice. You are recommending GPUs by their benchmark! Intel Arc are still not a good choice for productivity. You should use these gpu and give the feedback. Don’t give us false information. It is not a good practice.
what about after effects and CUDA?
day 2 of asking for a gaming pc
the Arc a580 is outperforming the more expensive Arc cards is it due to drivers ??????
yes, A580 has a newer driver than a750 and a770 :)
@@theTechNotice does that mean the "better" cards will perform better when newer drivers are released?
As always biased video against amd.
In what way?
@@theTechNotice when charts showing amd is ahead you started an whole new argument to make people feel uncomfortable to buy amd.
Also when amd just launched 7000 series gpu you talked about amd gpu having problem that makes pc restart itself automatically several times while there was no issues with nividia but now you didn't talked about it. If it still happens or not. You could have showcased how driver updates improved thing on amd side like you did for intel arc gpu in this video.
I dont really understand encoder quality. you say that you cant even tell the difference in the video export?
It sucks being poor.
Молодец - спасибо из России
I wonder if NVidia fanboys tell AMD sucks in productivity, after watching this video.
They Will. For them, it's just trash.
It's written NVIDIA, all caps.
Bro, the day AMD gets their shit together in Blender and Redshift, I will be switching to them. I have no delusions about Nvidia not overcharging for their GPUs compared to the competition, but for the time being, there are categories of GPUs right now that simply only Nvidia fills up so they essentially have no competition in that regard.
Most people, even nvidia fanboys don't say amd sucks for productivity. They are usually talking about the nvenc encoders and how they prefer using them over amd's encoders. Nothing wrong with either encoder.
Lower quality AMD 10:37