Starfield - DLSS 3 Frame Generation vs Native 4K - RTX 4090, i9 13900K
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 มิ.ย. 2024
- Comparing Performance and Image Quality between DLSS Frame Generation, Upscaling and Native 4K.
DLSS Frame Generation is achieved through the use of PureDark's new mod
DLSS FG: / posts
DLSS Upscaling only: www.nexusmods.com/starfield/m... - free nexus mod
4K DLSS Quality + FG: 0:00
4K DLSS Quality: 0:30
4K Native: 1:03
Side-by-side DLSS vs Native: 1:32
Image Quality Comparisons: 1:46
Specs:
RTX 4090
i9 13900K
32GB DDR4-4000 CL15
Z690-A Strix - เกม
More Starfield and Skyrim content coming
DLLS Quality looks better than native 😮
Thats the whole point. It is better. They are advancing this tech so fast.
if only they used ai to enhance the image and not upscale it that probably would look even better
Lol no it doesn’t you Nvidia shill, the pic at the end confirms it - DLSS cuts entire branches off trees at a distance and this will be much more noticeable on larger screen and slower cards that don’t need it.
@@Swaggaccino let me guess you are rocking an AMD Radeon 4gb 580?
@@mattwright6249 7900XT, 1440p/ultra 90-120fps on Starfield, FSR off 😘
What button to use to activate the settings on the screen? Reshade doesn't work with this mod right?
Why does your 4K native border less fullscreen off have render resolution scale off but mines doesn’t? Also when I used the mod it doesn’t set it to 66% do I have to manually do that?
Upscaling has to be turned off
Yes you have to manually set the resolution scale. 66% is equivalent to DLSS quality.
How can i contact you privately?
How is tour game not green/vlue filter theres a reshade or mod ?
I wouldnt recommend using reshade to fix the color grading as every area has a unique LUT. Use a mod called Neutral LUTs - No Color Filters on the nexus
Why FG only adds bellow 50% FPS more than DLSS Q ? According to NV and my own testing it should be closer to 80% even in more demanding scenarios. Is FG mod using modified version of FG to minimize input lag?
Also good comparison, especially the Image Quality at the end. It would be interesting to se how images compares when moving camera.
I read that starfield is a cpu intensive game as well so the frames could be bottlenecked by the cpu. Also let’s not forget this is a mod and not native dlss support so it could be unoptimized
@@aaronquarles3902frame gen doesn't uses any CPU so it wont bottleneck any framez
@@ForceInEvHorizon a cpu framepaces the frames to be displayed. a bottlenecked cpu will give you lower frames. That's why a 4090 with a slow cpu will gives you less frames than with a faster cpu. fake frames or real frames they are affected By the cpu
@@aaronquarles3902 no they aren't. hardware Unboxed show a demonstration on how Frame gen actually help CPU bottleneck in starfield mod. It was able to double the frame of the bottleneck cpu
@@ForceInEvHorizon for starfield im sure the frame gen isnt working as it would normally but if the cores responsible for frame pacing are overloaded by game engine calculations then it wouldnt help as much but if theirs enough cores but just overall slower cores then it could supposedly help but at the expense of input lag. frame gen isnt a magic bullet for more frames it comes at a cost
Hello. Why preset D?
great video mate!
was wondering if youre ever going to make a discord and release omen enb? Were all still waiting for that, fuck the cabbage authors. Anyways cheers!
Wait lol.. how does dlss create leaves there where 4K native is not have the leaves of a tree in the last part of the video? So DLSS is.. better then native 4K?.. what the heck.
The Frame Generator will come on nexus?
Not sure. Right now all of his FG mods are behind patreon
no puredark only releases non FG mods to nexus
Now it come to nexus lol
@@Mychannelbandung Yes, I saw the crack get posted on nexus. It will get removed though so be quick!
We'll see modders add in FSR3 and it's frame gen before Bethesda does.
There can be no such thing. fsr 3 is not out yet, they don't have the codes
Looks all good until you turn the camera and it finds the light source for the game and its starts to flicker big time. Its good but its a mod so its not as good as when the dev puts it in the game. Very impressive to say the least ..but im turning it on and off when i see artifacting or flicker from it.
Playing as a Todd Howard himself? Lol
Modders for win >D
If you can get over 60fps native at 4k it's not worth doing anything really in Bethesda games they don't need high FPS. The animations and action is always so slow 60fps is fine.
For better input lag. These games always feel heavy
There is a huge difference, 60 FPS is blurry on a LCD/OLED display to to hold and release pixel technology. 100hz cleans it right up for smooth motion clarity. Plus as others say input lag reduction is significantly reduced 60 FPS to 100 FPS. Once you get used to 100+ you can't go back to 60 without it feeling slow and blurry.
Is bro playing as Todd
give us wabbajack version of your skyrim pleeeaaaseeee :D
Bethesda is so lazy it’s insulting
amd is the reason dlss isn’t in the game, it’s not bethesdas fault
amd said they could add dlss it makes no sense why they didnt lol@@SirrMetal
@@axel-js7sk Yeah because a company would never lie right?
All games only ADM sponsored = sucks.
Nice lies.. I tested the truth and it turned out to be a lie
stop using drugs buddie
useless comment if you don't tell what you exactly tested. I saw other tests which relates to the same kind of gains.
Do you have a 40 series GPU?
@@omen_apollo good question. no frame generation, only upscaling if he does not.