@@Galm1Cipher0We don't know yet how long Overture will take to develop. It may be never. For a blank-sheet airliner design, it takes Airbus or Boeing about 16 years to get to market. From first prototype flown to production ready is about 4-5 years alone.
A small detail: Concorde was developed with technology from the 60s and there were no major investments in technical updates, due to its commercial failure.
I wish the Boom project every success in their project, however. Less speed and less power means longer flights, in the 70s and 80s 3.5 hours to cross the pond was a ticket seller for those rich folks in a hurry, flying at Mach 2 was a big thing back in the day (like jet fighter speed!) and still carries impressive bragging rights (twice the speed of sound!), less passengers means higher prices (Boom was originally designed for 200 passengers to make sure it was commercially viable) now with just 80 passengers ticket prices are going to be, once again, prohibitive for us normal folk. For me, the reduction of the sonic boom noise is a mute point and should be well down the list of priorities for a new superfast plane such as this, we have always felt that the overland 'boom ban' was just sour grapes from the US airline authorities hating the attention it was getting, Concorde just throttled back until it got over the sea (from an island!) and then spent most of the flight over water with the sonic boom turned up to 11!. 🙂
The Concorde exist and is créated in the 60’s with major tecnical advencement and the Boom in 2020 2030 70 years of equart, and the Boom was very inspired to the Concorde tecnical advencement.
Concorde bit off the Valkyrie. The only Concorde did was put a lot of money into a business venture that didn't take off like they'd expect. There was only 6 used by the UK no one bought them outside of the UK or France because they were not accepted at most major airports and couldn't fly over most major nations due to uncontrolled sonic booms. This expensive business venture hasn't been around in decades the tickets were so expensive that not every person in England would even have had a genuine memory with their own "commercial" airline. 💀💀💀
Obviously boom supersonic doesn’t realize the reason why supersonic travel was done away with it costs too much money to fly and the other reason is the Concorde was loud but boom thinks they will be able to get the overture to supersonic speed without afterburners witch is impossible because 35,000 lbs is nowhere near enough thrust to get it to supersonic speed it’s enough to get it off the ground but not supersonic speeds now all the major engine manufacturers have backed out now they are having off brand lesser known engine companies make the engines so it’s definitely not going to be safe the overture is not going to even make it to the market even if it does it’s going to be to expensive to fly in then it’ll be forced to be taken out of service then all that money they spent on the factory and building the plane would be all for nothing
Assuming the project is a success and all the ideal goals are met, Boom Overture will take the edge in sustainability and max distance, and those will be invaluabe advantages. These are aims though and not guarantees. I take a similar sentiment to you though. In my mind, nothing will usurp Concorde's title as the Queen of the Sky and she will always be the most impressive piece of aviation engineering, relative to its time. Even half a century later, Concorde looks futuristic, belong to an era yet to dawn.
The fuel requirement may require a new industry to be developed. Won't be cheap, so I'm guessing the fuel requirement is not a release goal, but something that will happen if the jet is successful with cheaper fuels. My magic crystal ball says the jet will carry rich and politically connected people, and a few plebs who win the lottery. The rest can pound sand.
Does it not have a windshield? Its all camera feeds? Hopefully pilots can fly with VR HEADSETS TO SEE EVEN MORE They can do that by mapping the cockpit buttons layout and reproducing it in the headset, while also taking the camera 360 camera feed and make a "environment" sort of like apple vision pro has.
Not permitted under most aviation safety administrations. In case of electrical system failure, the pilot must be able to control critical actuators (using ram air turbine power) and should be able to see where they are flying.
jes, by compromiseing pretty much everything, copying the concorde and rushing a not finished prototype to fly and into production they were a few weeks earlyer
Hi my name is Antonio Perez I would love to go to the Philippines from New York City and go back to New York City from the Philippines as well sincerely yours Truly Antonio Perez
This is really an academic question because it is unlikely that the Overture could be successful as a passenger airliner and the reason can be summed up in one word: Slots. To take off from a busy airport, you need a departure slot. To land at a destination, you need an arrival slot. A single modern airliner can seat 350 people while the Overture can only set about 120. By the way, a Triple 7 can also carry 21 kg of cargo. Now when that 350 seat airplane lands, a large percentage of passengers will continue on to their final destination, helping fill seats in their domestic market. If they were to only land 120 passengers, those seats in their domestic flights would be empty. Airports like JFK and Heathrow don't have any slots left at the times that wealthy people would find desirable to travel, and they are not going to give up a slot and a gate for 120 passengers when they can bring in 350 passengers (and freight) in the same slot and gate. Now it is possible that some airline would start service to these cities using less busy airports, but it is unlikely that they would find enough passengers that were willing to pay the premium necessary to make the venture profitable. It was not with Concorde, and the situation with slots at major airports is far worse than it was when Concorde🎉 was flying. The plane is too big for a business jet. The average international capable business jet carries less than 10 passengers. Now maybe Elon Musk would buy one, but it is unlikely that Boom could sell enough of these to make money at it.
The best? Concorde of course because it actually existed, carried passengers and was very successful.
Well the Concorde was unbelievably expensive and it probably took longer to develop than BOOMs Overture
@@Galm1Cipher0 Just let me know when the first one makes the flight from New York to London or Paris, I'll wait.
@@chorleycake7942I will let Ayou know, haters will be left speechless
@@Galm1Cipher0We don't know yet how long Overture will take to develop. It may be never.
For a blank-sheet airliner design, it takes Airbus or Boeing about 16 years to get to market. From first prototype flown to production ready is about 4-5 years alone.
very successful is a stretch
If it (the Boom Overture) doesn't exist, then there isn't much point to a comparison.
A small detail: Concorde was developed with technology from the 60s and there were no major investments in technical updates, due to its commercial failure.
I wish the Boom project every success in their project, however. Less speed and less power means longer flights, in the 70s and 80s 3.5 hours to cross the pond was a ticket seller for those rich folks in a hurry, flying at Mach 2 was a big thing back in the day (like jet fighter speed!) and still carries impressive bragging rights (twice the speed of sound!), less passengers means higher prices (Boom was originally designed for 200 passengers to make sure it was commercially viable) now with just 80 passengers ticket prices are going to be, once again, prohibitive for us normal folk. For me, the reduction of the sonic boom noise is a mute point and should be well down the list of priorities for a new superfast plane such as this, we have always felt that the overland 'boom ban' was just sour grapes from the US airline authorities hating the attention it was getting, Concorde just throttled back until it got over the sea (from an island!) and then spent most of the flight over water with the sonic boom turned up to 11!. 🙂
Разрабатывая проект спс , молодцы американцы !!! Успехов вам , Удачи!!!
The Concorde exist and is créated in the 60’s with major tecnical advencement and the Boom in 2020 2030 70 years of equart, and the Boom was very inspired to the Concorde tecnical advencement.
i beg you for making this the normal prices
Concorde was a Legend
A legendary disaster.
Lets hope BOOM Overture boom is a lot softer than the Concords BOOM.
i wonder if this is successful will they in the future build another model which has higher capacity and which is faster.
Boom is going to design and certify a new airframe, their own engine and a synthetic vision landing system in three years?
It's so nice to hear your beautiful voice, Kim. How's everything going?
Concorde still looks more modern 🤣 nothing will beat her
I absolutely agree! 😊
Concorde bit off the Valkyrie. The only Concorde did was put a lot of money into a business venture that didn't take off like they'd expect. There was only 6 used by the UK no one bought them outside of the UK or France because they were not accepted at most major airports and couldn't fly over most major nations due to uncontrolled sonic booms. This expensive business venture hasn't been around in decades the tickets were so expensive that not every person in England would even have had a genuine memory with their own "commercial" airline. 💀💀💀
Concorde was garbage.
Given Boom is just a concept that will never happen and Concorde had a 30 + year commercial career there’s not really a comparison
I,ll believe it.....when I see it.
Boom ,you have a long road to walk yet
Obviously boom supersonic doesn’t realize the reason why supersonic travel was done away with it costs too much money to fly and the other reason is the Concorde was loud but boom thinks they will be able to get the overture to supersonic speed without afterburners witch is impossible because 35,000 lbs is nowhere near enough thrust to get it to supersonic speed it’s enough to get it off the ground but not supersonic speeds now all the major engine manufacturers have backed out now they are having off brand lesser known engine companies make the engines so it’s definitely not going to be safe the overture is not going to even make it to the market even if it does it’s going to be to expensive to fly in then it’ll be forced to be taken out of service then all that money they spent on the factory and building the plane would be all for nothing
We'll wait and see 🤔
So, what I’ve taken from this, is that it’s just a shit version of Concorde. 👎🏼
Assuming the project is a success and all the ideal goals are met, Boom Overture will take the edge in sustainability and max distance, and those will be invaluabe advantages. These are aims though and not guarantees. I take a similar sentiment to you though. In my mind, nothing will usurp Concorde's title as the Queen of the Sky and she will always be the most impressive piece of aviation engineering, relative to its time. Even half a century later, Concorde looks futuristic, belong to an era yet to dawn.
Get it done, no more computer graphics.
The fuel requirement may require a new industry to be developed. Won't be cheap, so I'm guessing the fuel requirement is not a release goal, but something that will happen if the jet is successful with cheaper fuels. My magic crystal ball says the jet will carry rich and politically connected people, and a few plebs who win the lottery. The rest can pound sand.
We'll wait and see
Does it not have a windshield? Its all camera feeds? Hopefully pilots can fly with VR HEADSETS TO SEE EVEN MORE
They can do that by mapping the cockpit buttons layout and reproducing it in the headset, while also taking the camera 360 camera feed and make a "environment" sort of like apple vision pro has.
Not permitted under most aviation safety administrations. In case of electrical system failure, the pilot must be able to control critical actuators (using ram air turbine power) and should be able to see where they are flying.
Boom definitely is going to be better.
well, the better is actually the one that existed.
Soviet first actually super flight not Concord plane
jes, by compromiseing pretty much everything, copying the concorde and rushing a not finished prototype to fly and into production they were a few weeks earlyer
It failed though!!!
It was a jet bomber......with seats
Why is Delta lagging behing United and American????
I'm not interested in boom, IT DOESN'T HAVE A DROOP SNOOT!!!
Its because the captains can see the runway still. Duhh
@Imadeahandle-zancudaNotfin Well, I like Droopy Snooty
WHY IS OVERTURE MUCH SLOWER THAN CONCORDE????😢
Hi my name is Antonio Perez I would love to go to the Philippines from New York City and go back to New York City from the Philippines as well sincerely yours Truly Antonio Perez
No Mach 2, no fun.
Overture is merely a series of computer generated images. Concorde is a real aircraft......no comparison.
Did they have to take the dumbest name possible? Boom? Wtf.. so dumb. It looks cool tho. We'll see when it exists I guess.
Overture? Ehm, oh, and it have Symphony engines. LOL at those two names. 😂
@@GamerKate1 "Boom"
This is really an academic question because it is unlikely that the Overture could be successful as a passenger airliner and the reason can be summed up in one word: Slots. To take off from a busy airport, you need a departure slot. To land at a destination, you need an arrival slot. A single modern airliner can seat 350 people while the Overture can only set about 120. By the way, a Triple 7 can also carry 21 kg of cargo. Now when that 350 seat airplane lands, a large percentage of passengers will continue on to their final destination, helping fill seats in their domestic market. If they were to only land 120 passengers, those seats in their domestic flights would be empty. Airports like JFK and Heathrow don't have any slots left at the times that wealthy people would find desirable to travel, and they are not going to give up a slot and a gate for 120 passengers when they can bring in 350 passengers (and freight) in the same slot and gate. Now it is possible that some airline would start service to these cities using less busy airports, but it is unlikely that they would find enough passengers that were willing to pay the premium necessary to make the venture profitable. It was not with Concorde, and the situation with slots at major airports is far worse than it was when Concorde🎉 was flying. The plane is too big for a business jet. The average international capable business jet carries less than 10 passengers. Now maybe Elon Musk would buy one, but it is unlikely that Boom could sell enough of these to make money at it.
A 777 can carry 21 kg of cargo? Doesn't seem very much.
Boom doesn't exist.
Not true
Not true dumbo
.
Not smart
concorde plus boeing 747;overture
The concorde is better.
Poor marine life.
fishy ears gonna go *BOOM*