BigBrainCo Debunked - Reincarnation | Pseudoscience Police

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ธ.ค. 2022
  • This is a video examining Bigbrainco’s claims on the Reincarnation of Shanti Devi.
    One-time donation:
    UPI: scienceisdope@icici
    buymeacoffee.com/scienceisdope
    Community:
    TH-cam Membership: / @scienceisdope
    Patreon: / scienceisdope_
    Discord: / discord
    #Reincarnation
    #Rebirth
    #ShantiDevi
    Sources:
    [1]: The BigBrainCo Video I’m examining - • SHANTI DEVI -Indian Re...
    [2]: Carol Bowman’s Website - www.carolbowman.com/dr-ian-st...
    [3]: International Aryan League Report on Shanti Devi - indianculture.gov.in/archives...
    [4]: The podcast that critically analysed Shanti Devi’s case -
    open.spotify.com/episode/2gP9...
    Patrons that support me at the highest tiers:
    Wesley Potts
    Nithin V Nath
    Animesh Chaudhary
    AV
    rahul raman
    Abhilash
    Nate Hand
    Prabhakar Bhat
    Jeevan
    Sumana Gopinath
    Vivek Balasubramanian
    Arun Kumar
    Rags H
    Anshul Kashyap
    Yudhister Satija
    Abhilash Narendra
    Sushanth
    Kiran CJ
    sashipraveen kalli
    Suds Mekathotti
    tariq sharif
    Dev Agrawal
    Thinking Humanist
    Dheeraj
    Wrichik Basu
    Music Credits:
    Warzone - Anno Domini
    Bodega - Underbelly
    Hop Hip - Kwon
    Follow me on social media:
    Instagram: / scienceisdope_
    Twitter: / scienceisdope_
    TH-cam: / scienceisdope
    Reddit: / scienceisdope

ความคิดเห็น • 939

  • @BrVr
    @BrVr ปีที่แล้ว +941

    And Ranveer's reply to this video will always be "But bro science doesn't know everything, what if science proves reincarnation in the future"?

    • @HarshaVardhan-ir5dn
      @HarshaVardhan-ir5dn ปีที่แล้ว

      @@motherisape haha

    • @abj1203
      @abj1203 ปีที่แล้ว +216

      I just read the "" part in ranveers voice 😆

    • @sumangm7
      @sumangm7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Y not? Science has already proven reincarnation... Once you die and become ash or soil...you go back to the soil and be there as some chemical elements and plants will absorb you and you eventually can be reincarnated as a flower or a fruit. 🤣

    • @sanchariBahubali
      @sanchariBahubali ปีที่แล้ว +8

      🤣🤣

    • @BrVr
      @BrVr ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@abj1203 😂😂😂

  • @motherisape
    @motherisape ปีที่แล้ว +429

    With big views comes big pseudoscience

    • @CANCUN-ot9qr
      @CANCUN-ot9qr ปีที่แล้ว +54

      With big pseudoscience comes big views

    • @nishchalsucksatjee7404
      @nishchalsucksatjee7404 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      with less views comes big science

    • @NordicPolestar
      @NordicPolestar ปีที่แล้ว +12

      With big views come big money.

    • @nikhilchadokar
      @nikhilchadokar ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Majority is very unsophisticated audience!

    • @VoidWanderer198
      @VoidWanderer198 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      False analogy 😂😂😂

  • @wolframsigma6
    @wolframsigma6 ปีที่แล้ว +253

    I realised that compared to older videos, in your recent ones you have become more polite and composed and you try to put out your point without attacking someone for the beliefs they hold. This is really good and shows your knowledge/maturity because earlier these guys had an excuse of "you hurting their sentiments" to dismiss your rational points, but now they can't even do that. I too need to learn this from you , to put forth my point in a much better way to people I am talking to.

    • @Maheshkangude
      @Maheshkangude ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@AamAadmiSamajwadiParty brother read actual science not mumbo jumbo

    • @alamgirhossain2791
      @alamgirhossain2791 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@AamAadmiSamajwadiParty 😂😂he's a hypocrite

    • @wolframsigma6
      @wolframsigma6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@AamAadmiSamajwadiParty why?

    • @pradyumn2692
      @pradyumn2692 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wolframsigma6 actual science is based on trying and testing. Even you can verify it. Reincarnation for example, cannot be verified no matter how much you argue.

    • @pae4582
      @pae4582 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Xx

  • @raghavmathur5479
    @raghavmathur5479 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I'm still not convinced bro, it's like you don't wanna accept just because they come from a box as you just explained in the earlier minutes of the video 😅 Hypocrisy ki bhi seema hoti hai bhai

    • @mdo1733
      @mdo1733 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Apart from Shanti devi there are multiple other evidences/ stories of reincarnation. It's a faith based on evidence - why assume that any scientific theory concluded didn't have any bias of the scientist. Even if he didn't have an objective to prove if you think you can read through data and not deduce something different from the other person is stupid
      I respect him for exposing pseudoscience but it's fair to say he's bias too. Calling reincarnation, karma as a unicorn in the room - karma is the only thing that can explain how we are different from birth. Or would they just say this is pure luck - in a world which has been proven by science to be so proportionate and mathematical, this is just by chance?

    • @zz2793
      @zz2793 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Listen to what he said. He didn't say that these stories are fake. Nor did he say reincarnation is wrong. He too said he isn't convinced, need more proof for him to believe

    • @user-qm1dc6lz7u
      @user-qm1dc6lz7u 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He opinionated this basis of few google searches and his beliefs that arya samaj people can't be unbiased. He didn't give any evidence to support his statement that they were unbiased while studying the reincarnation. You might see this in his other videos as well where he asks for evidence but when provided he uses reasoning to discard it, without providing any evidence supporting his reason.

    • @awesomeboi1772
      @awesomeboi1772 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@user-qm1dc6lz7u didn't he said that those people already believed in reincarnation? So yes it can be biased, but can be true too?

    • @user-qm1dc6lz7u
      @user-qm1dc6lz7u 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@awesomeboi1772 meaning what? If I show you some result of an experiment, you can't claim it's authenticity because of biasness. In order to study and correlate phenomenons like reincarnation, that bias is required and justified. It's like saying dark energy is there because one is biased towards science. It's really funnily stupid argument to make when one presents evidence of it. 😅

  • @nandakishore588
    @nandakishore588 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    The main hypothesis at the center of re-incarnation is that physical bodies can die, but the consciousness does not : it just changes its location to another body. the fundamental problem is that currently science does not have a way of defining or measuring consciousness, or to track its movement. but scientists accept that we are conscious, that is why we are able to think & reason. It's a strange paradox that scientists cannot deny the existence of consciousness(as they could not think or have awareness without it), yet they cannot define it , thus they cannot disprove its claimed ability of re-incarnation. Without this ever being clearly defined, this subject can never be proven or disproven. I am interested if anyone has a method to actually approach this subject in a new way, rather than just calling it a hoax.

    • @subramanya1780
      @subramanya1780 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Hi Sir, I am a student of Shri Shankaraacharya's Advaita Vedanta Darshana. Having studied other Indian Philosophical schools such as Nyaya and Purva Mimamsa Darshana, let me give my perspective of Re-Incarnation. Please bear with long answer.
      Also I have highlighted few words using double inverted commas and has put my views in points for easy understanding.
      1) Theory of Incarnation is the byproduct/"corollary" of "Law of Karma".
      Law of Karma is just a "Model" trying to explain the differences we experience in all of our Life similar to Atomic "Model" trying to explain different observed phenomenons such as Photoelectric effect or Heat transfer between different bodies or Chemical Reactions etc.
      Model word used here in my perspective is a theoritical framework which is a closer "approximation" to Reality based on Available Data and Inference.
      2) Let me clarify what I am trying to say with a hypothetical example.
      Let's say person A and B has a son C born in place P1 at time T1, person D and E has a daughter F born in place P2 at time T2.
      Now if anyone asks a question which may look absurd or weird to us which is "Why" was C born to A and B only but not to D and E? "Why" was C born at place P1 only but not at place P2 or some other place?
      3) "Why" was F female but not male to which initially we can say because the way chromosomes arranged in Zygote to which again it can be asked that "Why" were chromosomes happened to be arranged in that way and this discussion goes on with further "Why".
      4) Let's say F had good education and not C. Now one person can again ask "Why" F got good education but not C?
      Even if we give answer with reasons such as A and B were poor and could not afford good education to C etc to which the questioner can further ask "Why" A and B were only poor but not D and E.
      5) Here Law of Karma tries to explain these differences with the concept/"Hypothesis" Merits(Punya) and Demerits(Paapa) of C and F which were generated out of there past action.
      6) Now the questioner may ask When/Where/Why did C and F do an action that generated Punya or Paapa that made them to be born in respective families in first place to which Law of Karma through "Anumana(Inference)" says that they "probably" must have done this action in "their past life".
      Again not based on Pratyaksha("Direct Perception") but just Inference.
      7) This "Model" also serves another purpose. Since it says that past actions result in merits and demerits at present, similarly present actions decide our future and "may" help in our next life "if exists" to go good if we do good deeds and not do bad deeds. This may be true or not but motivates people to do good deeds and keeps them in check to not do bad deeds at present.
      8) The gist of above 7 points is Law of Karma is just a "Model" to explain the differences in each of our life experiences and Theory of Incarnation is just a "corollary" of that Model accepted in almost all Bharathiya Darshana or Indian Philosophical Schools.
      Of course this Model has greater potential to be misused to fool people as well.
      9) It cannot be proved as an objective fact like 2 + 3 = 5 because it is just a "Model".
      It becomes a problem to those Belief Systems(Religion)/Philosophical schools which considers the Law of Karma as an objective fact whereas there is one Philosophical School which has no problem which is Advaita Vedanta Darshana of ShriShankaraacharya because Advaita Vedanta though accepts it in the beginning finally refutes and rejects this Law of Karma as well.
      10) In future if a new Atomic Level Phenomenon is observed and current Atomic Model falls to explain it and a person P comes up with another Atomic Model which explains all past observed phenomenons and in addition explains this new phenomenon, then current Atomic Model will be rejected and that new Model of person P will be accepted. Till then current Atomic Model will be considered the best "approximation" of the Atom. Similar is the case with "Law of Karma Model" which is the current best possible explanation to different kinds of "Why" questions whereas other Models such as "Chance" or "God's will" etc may not explain all these satisfactorily.

    • @ericcartwheel6949
      @ericcartwheel6949 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@subramanya1780 thank you so much for such a detailed and wonderful explanation. I would love to discuss all this with you! Is there any way we can?

    • @zz2793
      @zz2793 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Science can't totally deny the existence of ghosts either. Cause there's currently no way to prove it wrong 100%. Does that make it real? Many religions and cultures believe in ghosts. Does that make it real??... These things can neither be proved real, nor be proved wrong. Also the people claiming these things should prove their claims. Why should science have the burden of proof?

    • @bruceboro5685
      @bruceboro5685 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good news for you. Every individual soul is going to break free from the cruel cycle of re-birth when all the glaciers on earth melt down. Don't save glaciers, save souls.

    • @user-qm1dc6lz7u
      @user-qm1dc6lz7u 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@subramanya1780 this is very comprehensive advaitic understanding. But it's somewhat theoritical Or bookish. We actually came up with certain proofs of experiences or fallacies that itself points out that reincarnation is the only possible answer. These are more from actual experience pov and not from the books.
      1. What we assume as birth and death is simply presence and absence of experience. No one has witnessed his own birth or death in any sense. All one has is third party pov, conveying him in the experience itself that he is born or gonna die. Lack of actual experience of this(Prtaykasha) is the key thing to note.
      2. Let's focus on one's memories as well. Let's say if one actually borns as new soul, then there has to be some starting point of experience. But in our case, no one remembers when exactly his experiences have started. The nature of experience remains same throughout, though contents in that change as per individual. So the only possible conclusion of this is this is beginingless, which is the actual observation we all can agree upon.
      Same way one can speak of death as well. There is always tomorrow. No one remembers dying.
      3. Now you could say that memory is associated with body. So it might not be valid measure. True. But there is none measure that would show us cognise the birth and death. It always feels like infinite loop, where there's tomorrow everyday. This is what caused them declaring Moksha is the highest goal because without it, this never actually ends.
      With these understandings, our vedas, irrespective of darshana, univocally stated that reincarnation exists. So when a sweet talking youtuber says reincarnation is not real, either he relies too much on bookish knowledge and has none intelligence to learn from experience to form his valid opinion (Jnana), and all of that for money which is worst that a hindu can do to his own religion.

  • @truepotential206
    @truepotential206 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Sad times we live in. Where people don't ask evidence for BS claims but need to be shown evidence to debunk those claims.

    • @vivanraj9518
      @vivanraj9518 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Where is the evidence which debunks this? Did you dig deeper? Sad times we live in. When people believe in random people making baseless videos refuting reality in the name of science instead of searching for true knowledge in content created by people who devoted their entire lives studying and researching on the matter.

    • @sai62789
      @sai62789 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      People like you think that by repeating "science science" you will look cool, irl y'all seem to have zero scientific temperament. The video guy had no rebuttal at all. He just blabbered relentlessly for 10 min with no substance. And then there are experts like you looking down on people haha.

    • @RUPEETRADER
      @RUPEETRADER 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@sai62789 you think by littering all day about your Vedas and scripture will make you superior to others. The guy in the video is asking for proofs which you couldn't provide. Hence all your claims are denied and that is what hurting you.

  • @ashutoshmahapatra537
    @ashutoshmahapatra537 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    This is the earliest I've ever been, but I just want to tell you to keep continuing the good work. India and the entire world need to think more critically..

  • @revinray
    @revinray ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I have doctorate in ninjutsu, why does no one takes me seriously : (

    • @1234kenekiii
      @1234kenekiii ปีที่แล้ว +4

      We need the evidence 🫡

  • @smilingladka
    @smilingladka ปีที่แล้ว +87

    I know about this guy who committed suicide, and in his note he said that he wants a better life in his reincarnation. Poor guy. Remember people, there's no way to make sure that you get an other life after death! Please embrace the one you've currently, and live the fullest.

    • @lolong5976
      @lolong5976 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Reminds me of Sadhguru lol. "If you believe in heaven then it means you believe that somewhere there's a place filled with joy and happiness. If this is your belief then what are you doing here? Why don't you go there? Now obviously there's only one way to go to heaven. And that is to die. But you don't want to die, you just want to "believe" in some imaginary place. Instead of improving your life here, on this planet, instead of making your surroundings heaven-like, you just wanna excuse your misery by saying you believe in some imaginary place called heaven. A place you can't even access in this life you're living right now. That's really stupid if you ask me"

    • @Tobschh
      @Tobschh ปีที่แล้ว

      ​​​​@@lolong5976 not everyone can improve the situation they are in, this only applies to able bodied first world npcs born with a silver spoon. Classical victim blaming, same with the concept of "karma". What drivel.
      Imaging being punished for something you don't even remember. Honestly it's just rationalization so indians could enforce their amoral caste system and justify povery and suffering as brought upon by that person so they could look away and not do anything.
      Really disgusting.

    • @malayjia1023
      @malayjia1023 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea Hebrews 9:27 “And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment.” true life comes from accepting Jesus Christ alone. There is no “2nd life”. ❤

    • @Than_os
      @Than_os 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Suicide actually decreases your soul's points for better life and u will end up in serving more harsh conditions

    • @josephwithf2952
      @josephwithf2952 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @smilingladka yeah that's true but that last message is for people who can actually enjoy their lives, remember not everyone has the same view on life, some people just can't keep living without hope and others is difficult for the surroundings conditions.

  • @vishhii_00
    @vishhii_00 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    U know what i fear , it's not these big psudeoscience youtubers , it's their influence they have on community...
    It's quite scary

  • @puneetmaheshwari
    @puneetmaheshwari ปีที่แล้ว +93

    thankyou for a great debunk video, today i learned not to only look for who has written/proven a thing but also to cross check their qualifications if they are biased towards that or not"

    • @softgrowl
      @softgrowl ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AamAadmiSamajwadiParty ps bs

    • @rishinair595
      @rishinair595 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This wasn't really a debunk video

    • @mortwycker
      @mortwycker ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@rishinair595 Yeah, you don't really need to debunk these things because common sense and education is enough to do that. He is just stating the obvious facts people don't tend to accept.

    • @whykoks
      @whykoks ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Even Einstein's opinion on quantum entanglement was not accepted in scientific community and now almost after a century it's proven that Einstein was wrong. It's absolutely the basic tenet of rationality that persons are immaterial, ideas and evidences are supreme. It's a misleading narrative being run for long that science doesn't know everything, whereas science never ever claimed to know everything. The right narrative about science would be "science questions everything, and please don't get offended instead cooperate".

    • @puneetmaheshwari
      @puneetmaheshwari ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@whykoks well said

  • @laxyasharma7535
    @laxyasharma7535 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Bro, When you said, "Biased does not mean wrong, it can be right", my respect for your scintific temperment touched sky. Your reasoning is so open and awear about every possibilites and thier respective probability #respect

    • @raghavnamasivayam8706
      @raghavnamasivayam8706 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Well if you see everything just through one lens without having the possibility of know multiple lenses then you're not rational

    • @laxyasharma7535
      @laxyasharma7535 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@raghavnamasivayam8706 I agree with you 100% but that doesn't imply that the lense which you are using is wrong, I mean that possibility is wrong

    • @raghavnamasivayam8706
      @raghavnamasivayam8706 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@laxyasharma7535 well how do you say that lense is not wrong what possibility is wrong judging our religion by western lens is wrong judging our civilisation by western lens is not wrong
      Well how do you say the probability is wrong

    • @raghavnamasivayam8706
      @raghavnamasivayam8706 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@laxyasharma7535 well the lens which you're using is not rational nor does it see different perspectives

    • @laxyasharma7535
      @laxyasharma7535 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@raghavnamasivayam8706 Agree 🙏

  • @dr.harleyquinn9972
    @dr.harleyquinn9972 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Thanks for choosing this topic. India should be saved from pseudoscience.

    • @softgrowl
      @softgrowl ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@AamAadmiSamajwadiParty pseudoscience bs

    • @raghavnamasivayam8706
      @raghavnamasivayam8706 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@softgrowl well psychology is also pseudoscience would you deny that

    • @softgrowl
      @softgrowl ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@raghavnamasivayam8706 source please. Back your claim if you are serious

    • @raghavnamasivayam8706
      @raghavnamasivayam8706 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@softgrowl well psychology is pseudoscience do you know what pseudoscience is or you're just ranting psyche of a person is observed through just seeing the individual not a physical and science is observing the physical not non physical psychology isn't a physical quantity like you can measure it's a abstract idea just like reincarnation
      Psychology is considered pseudoscience by scientists themselves you you would not tell people not to go to a psychologists and say psyche is real which it is just like reincarnation can be real based of the memories which is exactly the same as described by the individual

    • @softgrowl
      @softgrowl ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@raghavnamasivayam8706 that's not the topic discussed here. Reincarnation is bs. No time for your empty rants whataboutism. Whataboutism itself is acceptance of ps.

  • @MG-qu9ig
    @MG-qu9ig ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I always wonder - Why does people with such unique doctorates never get Noble Price for their contribution.🤔

  • @ambikasankarguru8537
    @ambikasankarguru8537 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    When I was a kid I used to tell lies in such deatail and confidence people almost used to beleive them, maybe she was doing the same

    • @samuelrahulpeter
      @samuelrahulpeter ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Hello Modiji 😂

    • @aakarshmaurya2265
      @aakarshmaurya2265 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I used to tell them that I came as an alien from Mars 😂😂😂

    • @ambikasankarguru8537
      @ambikasankarguru8537 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@aakarshmaurya2265 in 1900s they would've believed you

    • @aakarshmaurya2265
      @aakarshmaurya2265 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ambikasankarguru8537 maybe, lol 🤣

    • @Strawberry_champagne203
      @Strawberry_champagne203 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I think her parents were con artists they must had forced her to say nonsense to get famous

  • @vijaykumarrikhari1796
    @vijaykumarrikhari1796 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    My 2 cents for the Creator: As a student of science, I would love to humbly ask you to incorporate phrases like "These views are based on my understanding of reasons, and might carry some self induced bias here and there, or possible shortcomings." Since, in one of your previous videos, you just debunked few points (forget the title) without proper backing [as backings to claims are integral part of scientific debates/discussions]. So just passing on my thoughts. 😇

  • @Realoffguard
    @Realoffguard ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Congrats on 100k.
    If there any channel who deserves it and so much more it’s you

  • @biswadeepsen3108
    @biswadeepsen3108 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Great job Pranav! Keep up the good work!

  • @sangitaekka
    @sangitaekka ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Years ago I read this book - Many Masters, Many Lives, by Brian Weiss and it touches on the same subject. Frankly, reincarnation is a fascinating topic in itself. But forcing it down on people as truth just takes the curiosity away. Good video, as always.

  • @vishalpoojary16
    @vishalpoojary16 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    Dr. K.S. Rawat - Doctorate in 'Reincarnation'
    Dr. Pranav (a.k.a. Science Is Dope) - Doctorate in 'Grabbing psuedoscience peddlers by the balls'

    • @fish00p
      @fish00p ปีที่แล้ว

      Gayyy

    • @subham.biswas
      @subham.biswas 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well we have gender ideology studies so why not reincarnation studies.

  • @nahileftnahiright
    @nahileftnahiright ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video bro looking for more videos in the series, keep doing

  • @chamuthenuja2937
    @chamuthenuja2937 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    About time you covered “Reincarnation” Pranav 💯👏.......the lack of evidence on reincarnation is a big reason why I left Buddhism. But the number of so-called real life reincarnation stories are in the thousands - and all of them lack reasonable, nevermind extraordinary, sources.

    • @aishwaryaprakash229
      @aishwaryaprakash229 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      One thing I learned that religion all comes alike oneday, buddha had a whole different view from the religion teachings - buddhism. But its is comes alike with religion . Its better to learn by ourself rather than a groupe 😅

    • @divx3088
      @divx3088 ปีที่แล้ว

      Here is something to see as well
      th-cam.com/video/zWWa612Eq-4/w-d-xo.html

    • @disguisedtiger9594
      @disguisedtiger9594 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      So are u an Atheist now?

    • @causeseffects5604
      @causeseffects5604 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What type of evidence your intellect will require to conclude otherwise ?

    • @chamuthenuja2937
      @chamuthenuja2937 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@causeseffects5604 evidence must be empirical, replicable, falsifiable, systematic and objective....

  • @shenoyenterprises
    @shenoyenterprises ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Brilliant as Usual.
    I've been watching your for a while, lately I've noticed that the Presentation has improved.
    Keep it up.

  • @inprogress9757
    @inprogress9757 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can't wait for the rest of this series, super excited!

  • @prynka2552
    @prynka2552 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video, had fun watching it. Keep making them.

  • @rol286
    @rol286 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice going bro.
    Your subscribers are increasing.That is a good sign.
    We need more people like you to debunk these type of videos.

  • @bossgandy
    @bossgandy ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Also why is it one person in billions? These stories are always very selective. If reincarnation is real shouldn’t it be for everyone in the world? What about animals ?

    • @yeahsowhat643
      @yeahsowhat643 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don’t understand the duality of our world. Things will never be 100 percent. Your going to have people in both sides of the spectrum.

    • @bossgandy
      @bossgandy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yeahsowhat643 so only few people get reincarnated? how do you know this?

    • @yeahsowhat643
      @yeahsowhat643 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bossgandy and how do you know they don’t. My point is you don’t know and the story could be much bigger then our minds can fathom. You don’t understand that energy never does and our mind and souls are constant energy on this plane. Please explain where the energy goes if it’s not reincarnated. Also, maybe others remember for particular reason but to say it’s completely false is a narrow minded human thought.

    • @bossgandy
      @bossgandy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yeahsowhat643 If you have evidence, we can discuss, till then it doesn't concern any of us. We have this life to lead, so let's make the best of it

  • @krantichinchaniwale
    @krantichinchaniwale ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Ranveer is really stupid but... "People are not stupid. They believe things for reasons. The last way for skeptics to get the attention of bright, curious, intelligent people is to belittle or condescend or to show arrogance toward their beliefs." - Carl S

    • @parths6865
      @parths6865 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Nope I think Ranveer is Smart enough to know the stuff he puts on his platform is Bulls**t. He very well knows where can he get views from
      That makes people who consume his media stupid

    • @rol286
      @rol286 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ranveer is smart enough to know what content sells.

  • @idontknow8299
    @idontknow8299 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    ranveer is a fuckin genius man, he himself does not believe in this stuff that's why he puts a disclaimer to play safe but he knows where the capital is in fact he might be watching your video with a smile thinking i know man chill, he is nothing less than a politician man kudos to him and you both

    • @trick_er
      @trick_er ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Your name is I don't know..but You know the truth👌😊

    • @ChadErenYeager9392
      @ChadErenYeager9392 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      His audience are mostly Bhaktas

    • @riri-pz3by
      @riri-pz3by ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He is a perfect buisnessman

    • @dibyasambidhansahoo9887
      @dibyasambidhansahoo9887 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What do u mean by he's great then if he knows n still creates such misleading videos

  • @qwertyuiop-il8dc
    @qwertyuiop-il8dc ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I like the patterns in your videos
    like hammering Carl sagan's evidence quote exactly when it's needed
    And that burden of proof at 7:05
    Perfect style of video presentation hope it effects the people who atleast try to think before believing everything

  • @enjoyer5497
    @enjoyer5497 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really loved your take on this issue. Thanks for the video once again and again you ended up in my liked videos. Now I guess I have to make a separate playlist for your videos, lol. 😅😅😅

  • @hijack69
    @hijack69 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I'm curious. You didn't debunk Shanti Devi's reincarnation story.
    Don't you believe it has some truth to it if a girl can vividly describe her past life and things actually turn out to be accurate. Also she isn't the only person in the world who remember events from their oast life, there have been multiple stories of children accurately describing their past life all across the world

    • @scienceisdope
      @scienceisdope  ปีที่แล้ว +24

      I don't believe it but i'm open to it. All I need is convincing evidence

    • @kyarebhikmangya
      @kyarebhikmangya ปีที่แล้ว

      @@scienceisdope you can research it on your own, many cases of reincarnation is present.

    • @rohitk8797
      @rohitk8797 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      If it’s true then we’ll find out after the post credits scene.

    • @abk192
      @abk192 ปีที่แล้ว

      Arpit explains debunked it

    • @pradyumn2692
      @pradyumn2692 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Oh never underestimate children's memory and their ability to imagine. What if she overheard someone from Mathura who were discussing this story ? Anything could've happened.

  • @suvam.behera
    @suvam.behera ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Pranav I would love that beside Pseudoscience Police series, you would make more educational videos on topics on popular superstitious in the country (there are tons). Trying to disprove BeerBiceps and his content too much might lower your credibility as one who is desperate.

  • @g.o.a.t84
    @g.o.a.t84 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Imagine every viewers of bigbrainco watched this and become rational 😌

    • @tvgr8218
      @tvgr8218 ปีที่แล้ว

      it will be for the better but one video does not make someone rational it is a transition, they will be denial initially and it will take many more experiences for a particular person to get to know the truth , for example I was a huge elon musk fan but then I slowly bit by bit I got to know his reality he is not the founder of tesla , he is from a rich family from south Africa who used to use child labor for their mines , has no knowledge about urban planning and lobbied against the California high speed railway in order to make his hyper loop also he lied on stage that he came up with the idea of hyperloop but it's from 1904 failed idea what he failed to do because he is basically trying to reinvent train.

    • @NordicPolestar
      @NordicPolestar ปีที่แล้ว

      Braincos' audience are indian... You expect indians to grow a brain and become rationalists overnight?

  • @saneinsein5343
    @saneinsein5343 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Woah, your explanation quality leveled up along with the content quality. (Atleast , that's how I felt. It was easier to understand)

  • @Lunarplex
    @Lunarplex ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You brought in the counter argument against the sceptical perspective at the perfect time! Bravo! And this is something I’ve been interested in too. Excellent work!

  • @rishinair595
    @rishinair595 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Hi Pranav, since the sources of information were involved in past life theories and the team that went to investigate Shanti Devi was from a religious group, they are biased sources but then isn't your own opinion on this topic a biased opinion. You don't really seem like a skeptic, but an outright non-believer in the possibility of extra ordinary happenings instead. So your opinion itself is a very biased opinion to look at things.

  • @A.A.FOOTBALL
    @A.A.FOOTBALL ปีที่แล้ว +9

    You are doing a great job brother👍

  • @rudranshnagar6363
    @rudranshnagar6363 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Pranav, I have been your subscriber for a long time now. I was thinking how an outro would be at the end of your videos? Just a suggestion; amazing Content though. Cheers!

  • @theeddieshow4
    @theeddieshow4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey Pranav , really appreciate your content , and what are you doing for the awareness of the society , as there is a thin line between science and pseudoscience . Which is the obvious reason of people getting trapped in the logical looking holes .
    Can you please tell how to find the solid and true facts without being distracted by the logical looking sources .

  • @antulii5390
    @antulii5390 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Thanks a lot, Pranav for debunking all these myths, the damage that pseudoscience has caused seriously needs to be undone. I hope your channel grows really fast.
    There is a video that has both Beerbiceps and PraveenMohan, must be pseudoscience on steroids 😂 Don't know what else they will do to ruin the scientific mindset of young people.

    • @sammybosak10
      @sammybosak10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Sadly you get called a jihadi,anti national,anti hindu, deshdrohi,or whatever when you call out pseudo science in india.

    • @runajain5773
      @runajain5773 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sammybosak10 but how

    • @kyarebhikmangya
      @kyarebhikmangya ปีที่แล้ว +1

      he did not debunked it, tf? he just said it might be true but there is not enough evidence from unbiased point of view.

    • @antulii5390
      @antulii5390 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@TH-camHandle00018 the 'others' are earning by doing m**- b** of science. So in this case, if you think Pranav is earning on these 'others' videos, I would any day support Pranav and Science Is Dope.

  • @atulkumar943
    @atulkumar943 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Dude I love your channel! The facts and evidences you come up with raises the bar high with every new video.

    • @causeseffects5604
      @causeseffects5604 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What evidence did he showed in this video proving reincarnation is false claim.
      Kindly share with me as well , will be helpful for me.
      I was not able grasp , accurate pinpointed evidence , proving reincarnation to be false claim.
      🙏😀

  • @nehashukla8159
    @nehashukla8159 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi pranav what's your take on Channel called String? Have you seen them?

  • @kakalicollectioncentre8405
    @kakalicollectioncentre8405 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Pranav, can you do a video on Eugenics, Racial Purity(DNA), is there any science actually ? Or just cultural racism?

  • @sarafat-dr3ek
    @sarafat-dr3ek 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Reincarnation if FALSE, nothing like that , 1 birth and 1 death thats all.

  • @souvikghosh5768
    @souvikghosh5768 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    He recently wrote a Tweet on some meditation backed by science 🤣
    I replied plz do attach those research paper in your description..
    Let's see what he'll do

    • @frisianwarrior2295
      @frisianwarrior2295 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Meditation is definitelly backed by science. They can measure how to parts of the brain that contains stress get smaller over time when having a meditation habit.

    • @souvikghosh5768
      @souvikghosh5768 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@frisianwarrior2295 I asked for those research paper links ..
      Please share 🙏🏻

  • @008bichi
    @008bichi ปีที่แล้ว

    What happened to Sudhanshu trivedi's video? Can't find it.

  • @Mrpositi
    @Mrpositi ปีที่แล้ว +7

    These ppl are gonna sell anything nonsense in the name of religion..

  • @aakansh45yearsago83
    @aakansh45yearsago83 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    can you cover the other famous reincarnation story of this kid who claimed to had been a WW2 fighter pilot and several neurologists from different universities, especially the University of Virginia researched on that case? I'd really love to hear your take on it since that case was probably the beginner of belief in reincarnation in the West.

    • @raghavnamasivayam8706
      @raghavnamasivayam8706 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well they won't because they think it's just pseudoscience

    • @sandeerao86
      @sandeerao86 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      No he won’t. Because it doesn’t suit his propaganda. Let him debunk Hyper Quest arguments

    • @aakansh45yearsago83
      @aakansh45yearsago83 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sandeerao86 lmao

    • @Im-BAD-at-satire
      @Im-BAD-at-satire ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can hear voices whilst still in the womb, it's not as clear but you do pick up on vocal patterns. This hypothesis wouldn't work well.
      Another hypothesis I have is that maybe some degree of the parents memory gets passed down through the formation process, perhaps the wife hearing stories coming from their husband, but I can't prove this so I'm only speculating. I don't have the tools to test my hypothesis.

    • @aakansh45yearsago83
      @aakansh45yearsago83 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Im-BAD-at-satire yea that might have something to do with it. Or maybe stories from grandparents and all. Idk lol. I would love to have an expert in this matter.

  • @VarunKumar-ro4ll
    @VarunKumar-ro4ll ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I would love to get behind the psychological reasons why the girl could recall those accounts in detail, was it something that got engrained in her through conversation or was it an elaborate con all together?

    • @abk192
      @abk192 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      U can watch arpit explains video on this he has explained whole story

    • @Vizrd58
      @Vizrd58 ปีที่แล้ว

      the latter

    • @booksanimeenthusiast3802
      @booksanimeenthusiast3802 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@abk192 any link?

    • @abk192
      @abk192 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@booksanimeenthusiast3802 Arpit explains punarjanam aisa search karo mil jayega

    • @rousisikder2006
      @rousisikder2006 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@abk192 ty

  • @chrome6715
    @chrome6715 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Plzz make something about Abhijit chavda
    That guy seems knowledgeable but sometimes he just propose conspiracy theories

    • @abk192
      @abk192 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol he is pseudoscience spreader and conspiracy theorist

    • @khosrowanushirwan7591
      @khosrowanushirwan7591 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Like what?
      Edit:-this is a science centered channel, it doesn't cover any other genre.

    • @Dr.BishalDoley
      @Dr.BishalDoley หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is a propaganda guy fr

  • @silacedisuza2018
    @silacedisuza2018 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Your work is amazing

  • @sayansaha4115
    @sayansaha4115 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Your channel is a gem,sir

  • @SiddharthBhatt24
    @SiddharthBhatt24 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can you please do a livestream with ranveer? I think it will be a very fruitful conversation with interesting perspectives from you both

  • @optimus4750
    @optimus4750 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congratulations for 1 lakh subscribers.

  • @Gokool_wid_Life_coz_YoLO
    @Gokool_wid_Life_coz_YoLO ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Introduction rocks! Good going 🤟🎉

  • @anshumanpanda1227
    @anshumanpanda1227 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    You didn't touch the kernel of the story again, Pranav. You simply discredited the people associated with it. That is not the scientific method, for such discredition can be applied to practitioners of any profession. (Ex: One can say scientists are biased against non material things only because they have the label scientists.)
    Kindly research more, Ian Stevension has written a book on it which I will begin in a few days. I recommend you to read it as well. If you truly are open minded that is.

    • @vaishanthjv2519
      @vaishanthjv2519 ปีที่แล้ว

      Here's the thing. The story can't be trusted to be true. There's one central source, this is different from science where several independent studies are conducted.

    • @anshumanpanda1227
      @anshumanpanda1227 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vaishanthjv2519 Not necessarily bro. I mean when the evidence is rare, not everyone can study it.
      But my point was that it has been studied, in detail too. Just not by too many people. You can read the book as I suggested, or watch ucla video as a primer.

    • @vaishanthjv2519
      @vaishanthjv2519 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anshumanpanda1227 and when something hasn't been studied by a lot of people you can't know its credibility. Your excuse can't be "Not many people study it" thats the reason you can't trust it yet.

    • @anshumanpanda1227
      @anshumanpanda1227 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vaishanthjv2519 Why don't you take up its study then? Certainly, rejecting something without study is unscientific.

    • @vaishanthjv2519
      @vaishanthjv2519 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@anshumanpanda1227Did I ever say I reject reincarnation?I just said I am not convinced that it is true. The burden of proof lies on the one making the claim, if you claim reincarnation is true, it is up to you to prove it.

  • @chiragdalwani4422
    @chiragdalwani4422 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Science is dope is my favorite science channel on youtube
    this is of the few genuine science channels and I love it

  • @aryansharma-fg3gl
    @aryansharma-fg3gl ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Today Vimoh talked about Acharya Parshant can you also make a video about him I would like to hear you thoughts on him, as I kind of disagree with vomih.

  • @sounakbandyopadhyay
    @sounakbandyopadhyay ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow nice work..Can you do research on this topic and make a video on how rationalist think about reincarnation claims and their conclusion on those cases. Really eager to learn

  • @adityamalgaonkar1
    @adityamalgaonkar1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks . Your channel is awesome. Would love to hear your take on Vandana Shiva.

  • @ichigokurosaki7945
    @ichigokurosaki7945 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is like Chinese cultivation novels where youngsters are reincarnated. 🤣🤣

  • @eyesofscience5111
    @eyesofscience5111 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Pranav... Can we get a detailed analysis on the planchette thing and how it is fooling us ?... Looking forward to learn more from you ... Respect and Love bro ❤️

  • @maahibanerje9013
    @maahibanerje9013 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are very articulate... Intro was on point

  • @MG-qu9ig
    @MG-qu9ig ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It's actually a vicious cycle. These people make pseudoscientific videos and more people watch it; Since more people are watching such contents they make more such videos🤦‍♂🤦‍♂

    • @Amin-js4en
      @Amin-js4en ปีที่แล้ว +2

      these videos end up spreading through whatsapp

    • @Crabbyfeet
      @Crabbyfeet ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yep, a vicious positive feedback loop for making tons of money.

    • @Crabbyfeet
      @Crabbyfeet ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@Amin-js4en I've been using whatsapp for 7 years and I've barely come across these stupid posts on pseudoscience lol.
      I guess I'm living under a rock.

    • @MG-qu9ig
      @MG-qu9ig ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Crabbyfeet You'll see such contents in family WhatsApp groups..

  • @rahulkrishna4427
    @rahulkrishna4427 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    u rock bro keep doing it...

  • @vinayak_1645
    @vinayak_1645 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so so much .. I was about to request you to do the same but I thought it might be weird.. But anyways it's happening.. Thanks bro 💓🙌

  • @Truth_Jc007
    @Truth_Jc007 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good work bro. 👏
    When will you reveal you silver play button for 100k subscribers ???

  • @dr.j3685
    @dr.j3685 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think there is zero possibility of previous incarnation

  • @iu9130
    @iu9130 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    After lugdi Devi's death her past life husband used to visit shops in front of her house - this was said by many of her neighbours and lan whatever guy.
    Also don't trust anything gandi says 😂

  • @Gokzz96
    @Gokzz96 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't normally Like or comment on videos. But I am doing it now, I gotta support u, on what u ar doing.👍

  • @vishwakumar2864
    @vishwakumar2864 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This video should also have included
    1) what could be the simple parsimonious explanations for how the girl explained the alleged past life events
    2) why reincarnation claims are untestable, without the possibility of inducing false memories or blatantly lying ?

  • @AtheistNihilst
    @AtheistNihilst ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yes let's go pranav we want series

  • @singhavijit96
    @singhavijit96 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Greatly appreciate your videos! Ranveer doesn't only spread willful lies about science but also about history. As a historian, it makes my blood boil at the sheer nonsense that this channel and his podcasts spread as objective and well-researched truths. On top of that he brings conspiracy theorist abhijeet chavda as an expert instead of actual historians on his platform. I am shocked why a so-called well educated, liberal minded person would willfully indulge in such false narratives. Sadly unlike your channel there is none out there debunking stupid history lies on these channels. :/

    • @pradyumn2692
      @pradyumn2692 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Bringing physicist to discuss history is like bringing Tendulkar to play football.

    • @ayanchoudhury6697
      @ayanchoudhury6697 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ranveer is not a liberal, he has been a RW propagandist for a long time now

    • @singhavijit96
      @singhavijit96 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ayanchoudhury6697 I see that now, but the circles he moves in, the people he interacts with in his personal life (other english speaking influencers and comedians) had me under a different impression. I guess its also easier to get views catering to RW propoganda (even if he wont agree with it personally) which makes him an even bigger a**hole. Just like Pranav has shown elsewhere that he doesn't practice NoFap himself but continues to push that bullshit down young impressionable teens.

    • @kostubsarma4873
      @kostubsarma4873 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ayanchoudhury6697 Ranveer Alhabadiya is a fast friend of Dhruv Rathee. At one time Ranveer fought with FMF and defended Dhruv too.

    • @nikhilhembrom8952
      @nikhilhembrom8952 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kostubsarma4873 well he is rw then he is pretty moderate because he doesn't say anything to leftists

  • @priyakulkarni9583
    @priyakulkarni9583 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Keep going. You are amazing yet simple guy

  • @akashmishra9209
    @akashmishra9209 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If there is a doctorate for 'reincarnation', then there should be a Nobel prize for that

  • @kashishaggarwal2217
    @kashishaggarwal2217 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Hi Pranav, Really appreciate you man, as an atheist i can wholeheartedly say that you made my arguments against existence of God much better and clear. But i have one question, like you said that "reincarnation is definitely possible", but can you explain it how? Maybe some another video on this or some scientific evidence or theory behind it?

    • @ezer8528
      @ezer8528 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think he misspoke right there. But it should be like 'Reincarnation has a possibility to be true or false'

    • @kashishaggarwal2217
      @kashishaggarwal2217 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ezer8528 but still i wonder how can reincarnation be true. I mean this isn't even Imaginative to me

    • @ezer8528
      @ezer8528 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kashishaggarwal2217 You should consider all the outcomes even the ones that seem to be absurd. All you need is crediable evidence to believe

    • @kashishaggarwal2217
      @kashishaggarwal2217 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ezer8528 yeah yeah I am considering it. It's just that my mind is f*cked when I think of reincarnation being true😂

    • @ezer8528
      @ezer8528 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kashishaggarwal2217 Well, I can't imagine how f*cked up the people's life are when they needed the reincarnation to be true

  • @AnonymousAlien2099
    @AnonymousAlien2099 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A person's brain which is a storehouse of life's memories disintegrates and decomposes so even if we consider reincarnation to be true, how can the same person claim he was someone else with exact details in his past life?

    • @indreshprajapati9095
      @indreshprajapati9095 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How can a electron be present in two different place at the same time its not possible but its true in quantum world. Same applies on other things nor everything is understood by science. For science we need tools to observe things and every tool has limitation that's a fact so how can you say something like reincarnation could be understood by science. It's like your trying to understand projectile motion with cell theory.

    • @AnonymousAlien2099
      @AnonymousAlien2099 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@indreshprajapati9095
      You're validating ridiculous superstitions using your half baked understanding of quantum mechanics.
      In standard quantum mechanics, there is no principle that claims a particle is present at two different places simultaneously. Quantum mechanics does involve some unique and non-intuitive phenomena like superposition, where a quantum particle can exist in multiple states at once, but this doesn't mean it's physically located in two places simultaneously. It's a probabilistic description of where the particle might be found upon measurement.
      The phenomenon you might be referring to is the wave-particle duality, where particles like electrons exhibit both wave-like and particle-like characteristics, but this is about the nature of particles and doesn't mean they exist in two places at the same time.

  • @csurbhi
    @csurbhi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If Mahatma Gandhi was involved in this episode, there should be news articles backing this claim!

  • @Ratnaprasad979
    @Ratnaprasad979 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yay first comment and like.. Love ur content bro.

  • @itsraahul
    @itsraahul ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Big Brain Co ? Where's the brain tho

  • @mortwycker
    @mortwycker ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Rationality is the key to a developed nation. 🔥 Great, informative and logical video as always.

    • @akhilsharma413
      @akhilsharma413 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nope this is one of the Most Wahiyaat (asshole) ever Solution from the People like you.
      The Key thing for a Developed countries are Good Governance Laws in Prime Minister's Gazette Letter (Raajpatra).
      You will observe one thing in Common among Developed country is that.
      1.All Developed countries have Right to Recall along with Voting Rights.
      2.All developed countries have Jury Rights.
      3.All Powerful and Peaceful country have Gun rights.

  • @Hassan14003
    @Hassan14003 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Carl Sagan refering to 3 major cases for investigating reincarnation debunks your rationalism

  • @subhanhasan990tsikfm
    @subhanhasan990tsikfm ปีที่แล้ว

    100k lets go broooo

  • @AshwiniKumarS
    @AshwiniKumarS ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Doctorate in reincarnation. That sent me laughing out loud in crowded public place

  • @sahilcool619
    @sahilcool619 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have been following your channel from quite a while, happy to see your channel grow 😇
    Keep doing what you doing🫡

  • @adityadikshit3717
    @adityadikshit3717 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for existing Pranav 🙏

  • @sosnikit
    @sosnikit ปีที่แล้ว +2

    bro i am so sorry for judging you at first go, I was in depression back then going through mental breakdowns and probably became one of sad gurus target audience,,, It was with time and actual spirituality introduced to me by Acharya Prashant.. that i could finally fully accept the science rebel inside me.... now your videos are making so much sense.. please if possible and if it falls in your context .. would u like to share your opinion on Prshant's POV. apology again for quick judgment and promise to never fall into the belief trap again.. lots of love

  • @WorldandSumeet
    @WorldandSumeet ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Doctorate in Reincarnation…. You can makeup any shit and become doctor of that field😂

    • @kamartaj3010
      @kamartaj3010 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      First of all universities giving such degree should be banned 😂😂

    • @sijajlum1234
      @sijajlum1234 ปีที่แล้ว

      it's para-psychology

  • @krantichinchaniwale
    @krantichinchaniwale ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Pranav , could you pls talk about satvic movement and their diet? Ty. :)

    • @krantichinchaniwale
      @krantichinchaniwale ปีที่แล้ว

      @@namrathainjeti3294 i am talking about their ridiculous diet

    • @VishwadeepShinde
      @VishwadeepShinde ปีที่แล้ว

      @@krantichinchaniwale Don't follow them. They are just a sellout. Recently I saw they are selling enema kit as well which can be dangerous to health. Colonics in US is done under experts and still its risky and these guys are just selling DIY enema kits. Better to follow some other pages.

    • @krantichinchaniwale
      @krantichinchaniwale ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VishwadeepShinde absolutely

  • @AA12434
    @AA12434 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sir , arya samaj is not hindu sect and certainly doesnt believe in reincarnation. Please make this correction.

  • @superhuman7581
    @superhuman7581 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "Shanti Devi" story is told in Shyam sighh Roy movie climax, and is expedition X show real??today telecasted episode, host talked to ghost lol 🙃

  • @DrRahul_Dixit
    @DrRahul_Dixit ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hey Pranab..
    Just discovered your videos few days back..
    Loved your bold take on such issues
    I request you to do a check on another Dr pseudo science Abhijit chavda

    • @soch1110
      @soch1110 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just because the proofs are put on your face by praveen mohan and Abhijit chavda,and you can't answer them, don't say them pseudoscientist.

  • @presunjittripura3795
    @presunjittripura3795 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    beer biceps left the brain😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @kAzVAGaming
    @kAzVAGaming ปีที่แล้ว

    congrats on 100k 😇

  • @kamleshsheth1974
    @kamleshsheth1974 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How about Ravi Verma- Toran Singh (Titu) case? Even BBC had documented. Please give your remarks. Ian Stevenson has documented hundreds of cases....what about them?

  • @dead4sure
    @dead4sure ปีที่แล้ว +3

    there was a 5 year-old boy who came to one of my extended family's house and started saying things in our dead uncle's tone of voice and things that a 5-year old stranger from 150kms away have no chance of knowing. He's 30+ now and don't remember anything but is now part of my extended family and also the reason I believe in reincarnation.

  • @vishnusudarsanam5375
    @vishnusudarsanam5375 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Man I have seen a recent event like this actually a glimpse about it in the local news channel. A boy who died a few years ago reincarnated and told the exact details. Both parents went to the police and the police were shocked and said that both parents could have him as their child. Maybe that will help in understanding it a bit deeper.

  • @lightyear5732
    @lightyear5732 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There are some things science can't explain it can ever explain, because the human intellect has to reach that level of consciousness to understand certain things. I don't know what it is with you. Just because your intellect is not able to process the information or you are not able to prove with science doesn't mean it is hoax. There are other stories of reincarnation like tutu Suresh case, where the kid remembered about his past life. There are some elements of truth in very religion. Just being an athesit doesn't mean you have to debunk certain philosophies that are written in religious texts. Rather than cooking a story about how this as fabricated, you can try to prove through science this is never possible, which you can't

    • @PaddyTheBaddie33
      @PaddyTheBaddie33 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Here’s the thing man! If him or likes of him are not upto “that” level of consciousness then the people who have “that” level of consciousness should come up with explanations and that too backed with proper evidence or formulas or anything which makes reincarnation believable.
      Imagine how easy life would be if reincarnation would be proved.
      Literally the world would be a better place. But seems like so called conscious people don’t want to make the world a better place, which is contrary to what they preach for hmmmm?
      And if you’d ask me to first believe and then experience, no thanks, cant do that. Cant believe everything anyone tells me as one shouldn’t.

  • @kollurubharathsimha539
    @kollurubharathsimha539 ปีที่แล้ว

    I find The way u handling the topics recently is mature . Previous ur bit rude . But I'm liking ur content because recent videos . Yeah u have point to be considered in previous also now also u have but . There is diff I find . Good work 👍