Imagine sitting in a tent and talking about whether to invade Korea, or Europe, or the Middle East, in the 13th century. Way before Age of Industrialization, or even the Age of Sail.
Imagine failing to capture a single castle in both Hungary and Poland, imagine failing to conquer backward Japan, imagine losing against mamluks,imagine not being able to conquer a single part of India 😭😭😭 Mongols empire aka the most overrated empire of all time
@@theentertainmentnation4694, Japan- The storm/hurricane helped Japan. Mamluks- They were fucking badass and at that time the most formidable fighting units so yea fair enough. India- Chingis Khan saw no reason to invade them and when his grandchildren decided to invade later, the Army was a mere shadow of what it used to be under Chingis Khan and The Mobgolian tactics were outdated. All in all the Mongols were still very savage and brutal and they had no real reason to kill Hungarians, Iranian, and so on but the Mongols were not overrated, maybe a bit too cruel but most Empires around that time and before also were kinda cruel.
@Abdullah Bhatti Apparently you have never read Medieval history. Killing babies and old people was popular way before the Mongols. Both Muslims and Christians did that.
It's darkly amusing that the story begins and ends with no less then Genghis Khan falling off of his horse and having to be hospitalized: it really does happen to the best of us. It also says something for the loyalty of his troops, that they didn't desert or overthrow him in this moment of seeming weakness.
"There is no warrior like [Yesügei] Bahadur, and no one else possesses the skills he had, but he did not suffer from hardship and was not affected by hunger or thirst. He thought his liege men could tolerate hardship as well as he could, but they couldn't. A man is worthy of leadership who knows what hunger and thirst are and who can judge the condition of others thereby, who can go at a measured pace and not allow the soldiers to get hungry and thirsty or the horses to get worn out." - Chinggis Khan (The Mongol Art of War - Timothy May)
“Who can’t stop drinking may get drunken three times a month. If he does it more often, he is guilty. To get drunken twice a month is better; once, still more praiseworthy. But not to drink at all - what could be better than this? But where could such a being be found? But if one would find it, it would be worthy of all honour.” ― Genghis Khan
@@patrickjuma1373 the next one is coming along wonderfully, but production has been slow as we both have full-time jobs. We are jumping into TH-cam full-time in July, so expect much more regular uploads then
As someone who’s always wanted too travel back in time to witness historic empires & events, this channel using the narration of historical accounts, makes me feel like I’m sitting at a fire with the Mongol’s sharing stories 🌌. What an amazing channel.
Great job at pronouncing the names. The Mongolian language isn't easy, especially that of 800 years ago, but I notice that some youtubers don't even seem to try. It really makes the video quality that much better when the creator/narrator pays attention to the names of those he's narrating.
@Erqĭn Məmbetjanuli 🇰🇿 Q̆iyat That's because Mongol was not initially an ethnicity, it was an identity-- and Turks adopted that identity. Also, to call him Şınğıs Xan is just linguistically wrong, even for Orqun Turkish. His name was Chinggis Qağan
....? I mean I'm pretty sure this isn't pronouncing it accoridng tot he rponounciaiton of 800 years ago. This is just adding emphasis and making the [x] guttural, it isi what english-only spekaers *imagine* what these languages sound like and that it takes some kind of great effort and 'difficulty' to do physically pronounce it, some kind of intrinsic 'difficulty' Age doesn't make ti harder or easier, and ease depends on the person and previous knowledge
@@mareksicinski3726 Yeah, modern mongolian is quite a bit different than classical mongolian. However, better to pronounce it like some form of mongolian rather than not at all. Also, its not just the "x" that I was talking about. The vowels and syllabic stress also make a difference
"From what I have seen, the one thing that people are least willing to give up is the desire to become a leader of others. You will see a person give up eating and drinking excessively; he will abandon wealth and expensive clothing. But when we assign him a position of leadership, he stands up and becomes antagonistic, defensive and ambitious" -Sufyān al-Thawrī [d.778 CE]
“Khatun (queen) is one of the most authoritative and magnificent words in the Mongolian language. It conveys regality, stateliness, and great strength. If something resists breaking no matter how much pressure is applied, it is described as khatun. The word can form part of a boy’s or girl’s names, signifying power and firmness combined with beauty and grace. Because of the admitted qualities of khatun, men have often borne names such as Khatun Temur, literally ‘Queen Iron’, and Khatun Baatar, 'Queen Hero’.” ― Jack Weatherford
Khatun isn't a Mongol word. Whenever you see Khatun it's usually a Turkic bride. Khatun is the female equivalent of lord or sir. Same for Batur and Temur. Temur is the Turkic word for Iron. Those aren't Mongol words, titles and names. Genghis Khan's real name was Timujin. Which means Ironsmith in Turkic languages. His father gave him that name after he defeated a Turkic rival. He respected his enemy so much he named his own son after him. Central Asian people had a lot of influences from each other. But the prevalence for Turkic titles and people's in the Mongol army isn't surprising. Most of the tribes he "unified" were Turk, not Mongol. The army of Genghis largely consisted of Turkic troops. The Turkic people refused were slaughtered. Hence when the Mongol empire fell, it splintered into smaller Turkic empires and gave rise to other Turkic empires. No one adopted Mongol while Turkic remained the dominant language in the central Asian steppes and beyond.
@@godofchaoskhorne5043 It is still a word in the Mongolian language, so he is technically correct. Also, his explanation on the meaning of Khatun is also correct.
Temujin (Chingis Khan) was sold into slavery to Tanguts when he was young man. He escaped and survived and later became a great khan of mongols. Tanguts treated him bad as a slave and were always arrogant towards mongols as they saw them as savages. Although culturally rich and more developed Tanguts still fell. And we see this pattern throughout history over and over. Arrogance of a more developed nation towards lesser one leads to demise of the first. Never be arrogant. Or as mongols say “Never treat a small kitten badly it might grow into a mighty tiger” ☝️
Sorry bro I am Mongolian, just correction Temujin ( Chingis Khaan) captured by Taichuud not Tanguut . Taichuud which means kind of lords in ancient Mongol language. Taichuud were Mongol tribe kind of blood relatives with Chingis Khaan. If you still hesitated on this . Mongolian secret history.
20:55 If I understand this correctly, Ogodei chose him to die because he tried to usurp the throne while Ogodei was sick, and then the guy basically accepted his fate and said, "You need to do a better job organizing your empire," thus foreshadowing how the Khaganate split into 4.
Wrong, the history got it wrong. Ogodei did not choose him rather when asked no one approached but Tolui his younger brother. Tolui was not a traitor or usurper, he was the most loyal and respected- his martial prowess, and actions speaks louder then words sacrificed himself for the greater good to show others of the length his lineage the Toluid are welling to go in order to preserve and maintain unshakable order in the mongol court. It’s incorrect to announce him a usurper, story prob got change from the original so as to sow discord in the mongol court, opposite of the true meaning.
Yeah I was trying to decifer what the narrator was conveying. Sounds like the prince gave back leadership once he knew Ogodei had awaken by faining drunk. But maybe its was all test from the start that altimately got his brother(the prince) poisoned.
Have been listening to the History of China podcast and the Mongol episodes are my favourite. The unstoppable might of the Golden Horde is truly awe inspiring. Really a section of history that is criminally untold.
@@Cecil_Augus genoicide means when you identify certain group of people based on the colour of skin or ethnicity like the German did in WW2 to slavs Jews and roman during ruling of Green Khan non of this existed
The correct way to pronounce any name is in the language rules of the people doing the talking. I laugh my ass off when village idiots try to insult somebody who doesn't pronounce a name in that persons native language. Most people cant reproduce the sounds made by many languages. The UK and the USA share the term schedule but its pronounced very differently by both and the correct way for an American to pronounce it is exactly how they pronounce it as they do in the USA. for example no matter how much wimpy Iranians complain that as Americans we pronounce their country Eye ran. We wont pronounce it E ron. Them whining about it only shows how weak they are. Whining is a sign of weakness.
@@pauldorfman701 Chinggis Khaan can be said perfectly in english and american. also why are you wasting your time writing a paragraph to someone who really dosnt care much, its not very smart. sidenote, Americans pronounce things wrong
I really love all that effort you put into your animation and narration, but as ESL i wish there was subtitles that aren't generated so that i can follow through the dialogue
2:09 Interesting tidbit that reminded me of something fascinating my old history lecturer explained regarding Medieval societies. Their obsession with not bearing insults and quickness to respond with violence can seem laughable by modern standards. Almost all (men) of the age were obsessed with status. But if you understand the context, it's not a case of thin skin, nor is it as illogical and juvenile as it might appear. Societies of the time (whether settled in castles of living nomadic lives on the steppe) were extremely unstable, violent places where privacy was a luxury and in physical security tenuous. People were only ever safe through playing a role within the group and because those groups either hid behind castle walls, in small villages or even smaller tents, these groups tended to form very rigid group hierarchies. Within these hierarchies, everyone was watching everyone else at all times; enforcing norms, strict rules and traditions. This in turn ensured the unity and security of the group. If you had a place in the group, then you could ride with the raiders or hide in the lord's keep when those raiders approached. However, if you didn't the world was a very dangerous place. So, what people in your group thought about you, mattered more than anything else. It was existential to everyone, even the guys at the top... in fact, especially the guys at the top. This is why wars were literally fought over nothing more than petty insults at times. Any slight on your honour, a worry of appearing weak or even the slightest insult; would be seen by the subject as a direct threat to their position within society and therefore a threat on their life, which could only be defended with violence. This in turn perpetuated the constant state of violence that marked the age, making it more dangerous for anyone not in one of these rigid hierarchical societies (anyone on 'the outside') and reinforced the entire vicious cycle, for hundreds of years.
Not to mention that if the defacto ruler of an area openly allows an insult to his person to go unpunished, especially the type of insult that implies NOT giving the support of men that the ruler demands, then said ruler will show weakness. If you do not reprimand reckless, ambitious upstarts within your own territory, then word of your weakness will spread, which will cause more upstarts to rebel all across your territory. It really isn't about personal honour in such a case, it's about maintaining what control over a fundamentally very volatile situation you can have. Having a vast empire comes at the cost of oversight. Rebellions from ambitious lords are to be quelled, not allowed to fester. The open insult and refusal to give aid, was as much a declaration of war as is possible. They likely thought themselves capable of handling the Khan army, spread thin like all imperial armies are, and thereby underestimated their enemy. Ghengis did what was neccesary here, though destroying the enemy's people entirely is exceptionally cruel. That cruelty, however, serves as a lesson: "don't rebel, or you and yours won't see the end of the year." George RR Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" has an excellently realistic example, though fictional, of the same situation, in the form of the young Lord Tywin Lannister, who responded to open threats and insults of his house by destroying all traces of the castameres, who refused to pay tribute to the Lannisters when demanded. Those threats and insults were only possible because his father was a weakling, a coward, and somebody who avoided conflict rather than attempting to solve it. So Tywin had to pick up the pieces. If he didn't do this, the situation would only have gotten worse, and other petty lords would have eventually rebelled as well. The genocide he committed is very cruel, but serves as the most effective reminder of what House Lannister does to rebels. As you said, medieval life, especially in areas of great conflict, was short, brutal and volatile. There is no other way, put simply, to deal with traitors and rebels, than brutal reprimand. You shouldn't let the wound fester.
When you hear about Ghengis Khan, even his childhood sounds like a myth, his words and actions like a wrathful God. How could one not be enthralled to follow such a man?
It’s like Augustus, there is a Roman story by the Emperor Julian that when presented to the gods most of the emperors were ignored but Augustus was pointed out by Zeus himself as his closest imitator.
Hard men lead the mongols. Soft men lead the people they conquered. Hard leaders make hard men if they are good leaders. Soft leaders always promote soft men.
I absolutely love that you have made this video with the Mongoliin Nuutz Tovichoi but I have to remind you that the content in that book is not 100% from legitimate sources and over time "by the Chinese" could have likely been altered and more of romanticized many times over👌
I listened carefully to the explanation of the world conquest of the Hyperpower Mongol Empire, which had the world's strongest military power. I was studying a world history textbook and it was helpful. 세계최강의 군사력을 자랑한 세계최강대국 몽골제국의 세계정복사에 대한 설명을 잘들었습니다. 세계사 교과서에서 공부중인데 참고가 되었습니다.
Years ago I worked with a couple fresh off the boat Mongolian guys at a warehouse. They were very proud of their heritage and eager to live up to their aggressive reputation. Unfortunately for them, our Hispanic coworkers didn't care. The two groups eventually clashed and the Mongolians were outnumbered and got beat. Didn't see them again after that.
@@fybrogen7473 Did I say something funny? Or are you just another butt-hurt Mongolian who's been taught since birth that you're the world's toughest people? This was over a decade ago. The only thing I remember about them is that they lived in Santa Fe Springs, CA and we worked for a window replacement company. The younger one was constantly bragging in broken English about how tough Mongolians are. They were quick to escalate even small misunderstandings to threats of violence. It was after one of these misunderstandings that they got beat and ran away.
There were 4 nations which have managed to defeat the 1200's Mongols in war ; Javanese (Majapahit), Turks (Khalji & Bahri Mamluks), Japanese, Vietnamese (Dai Viet). Mongols of the first half of the 13th century however were invincible
One of the reasons why the Mongols were so brutal and merciless was because they almost never tasted defeat. They didn't fear that anyone could possibly come and execute revenge for the slaughter of all the civilians because they basically thought they could not be defeated. It took a long time before some people like the Mamluks and East Europeans figured out how to fight them
Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World is a good read, the early chapters of Genghis's life and the clan nations uniting is cool enough. But it covers city raiding in the south intimately, and it sorta followed thusly: "We found a outpost with 3 meter high walls. It was difficult to take, but when we took it we made sure to capture and spare the engineer who maintained these walls. Next we had a town with 4 meter high walls. Rinse, repeat. Better engineer. Small city wall. R&R. Large City wall. R&R. Capital wall, ect." TLDR: The Mongols just sorta assumed that if it kept working, it was "Free Real Estate"
There were 4 nations which have managed to defeat the 1200's Mongols in war ; Javanese (Majapahit), Turks (Khalji & Bahri Mamluks), Japanese, Vietnamese (Dai Viet). Mongols of the first half of the 13th century however were unstoppable Major nations destroyed by the Mongols ; -Jin(Tungusic) -Khwarezmids(Turkic) -Souther Song(Sinitic) -Kara Khitais(Khitanic) -Cumania(Turkic) -Kievan Rus(Germanic and Slavic) -Seljuk Rum(Turkic) -Abbasids(Arabic) -Western Xia(Qiangic) -Volga Bulgaria(Turkic)
"Just as the mongols tore across Asia in the early 13th century" Isn't it amazing that we could say something so casually, especially when advertising an app game about an event that killed perhaps millions of people. Imagine, advertising a game like "Just as the Germans tore across Europe in the mid 20th century you too can build a Reich to wipe out your enemies.Even H!tler didn't have a dragon!"
well for what it’s worth, considering some are deeply effected by the past and what happened to their ancestors and is reflected in their behavior and sense of being. High time to get the narrative straight cause we don’t want the past to influence us so and have people suffering the consequences of those we weren’t connected to in action. “hey kid you ain’t the only ones, everybody went thro this in one form or shape and btw.. prime example our current status is one we all [politicians included and the like] face the end of us
Mangburni is considered a fearless leader and a great warrior.[3] Harold Lamb describes Jalal al-Din as "valiant son of a weak father",[37] Carl Sverdrup descibes Jalal al-Din as "brave and energetic".[4] Jürgen Paul describes Jalal al-Din as "the mighty wall". About his battle against Genghis khan at the banks of the Indus, Osborne describes him as the first vigilante enemy of Genghis khan[38] while Timothy May describes him as the most stalwart enemy of the Mongols in West Asia untill the time of the Mamluk Sultanate.[3] Modern scholarship credits him with halting the Mongol expansion by at least a decade. Shihab al-Din Muhammad al-Nasawi, the personal secretary of the Sultan Jalal ad-Din, described him as follows: He was swarthy (dark-skinned), small in stature, Turkic in "behavior" and speech, but he also spoke Persian. As for his courage, I have mentioned it many times when describing the battles he took part in. He was a lion among lions and the most fearless among his valiant horsemen. He was mild in his temper though, did not get easily provoked and never used bad language.[39] The Georgian Royal Annals from the 13th century described Jalal al-Din as follows: ...the Sultan Jalaldin - valorous and brave, courageous and fearless like some immaterial being, superb, strong and an excellent fighter, came to the rescue of his father with a 5 small group of soldiers, picked him up, and together they fled to Khorasan.[40] In Tabaqat-i Nasiri, Juzjani describes Jalal al-Din as follows: Sultan Jalal ud-Din, Mangburni, was the eldest son of Sultan Muhammad, and was endowed with great heroism, valour and high talents and accomplishments.[7] In The Complete History, Ibn al-Athir described Jalal al-Din as follows:[41] ...Jalâl al-Dîn whom all the princes on earth held in awe and feared. At the end of the battle of the Indus, Genghis khan said the following about Jalal al-Din:[42][10][43][37] A father should only have such a son. Whether he escaped from the fiery battlefield and came to the brink of salvation from the whirlwind of destruction, great deeds and great revolts will still come from him! Though considered a successful warrior and a general, Jalal al-Din is considered a poor ruler and his loss of re-established empire to the Mongol is attributed to the poor rulership of him. Jalal al-Din had enmity with all of his neighbours which resulted in Jalal's calls to form alliance against the Mongol army of Chormaqan being dismissed by all other Muslim kingdoms. Though historians agree that Jalal al-Din inherited these enmities from his father and predecessros.[1][3] Ibn al-Athir described Jalal al-Din as follows in regard to his ruling:[44] Jalâl al-Dîn was a bad ruler who administered his realm abominably. Among the princes who were his neighbours he did not leave one without showing hostility to him and challenging him for his kingdom, acting as a bad neighbour. As an example of that, as soon as he appeared in Isfahan and gathered an army, he invaded Khuzistan and besieged Tustar, a possession of the caliph. He marched to Daquqa, which he sacked and where he killed many people. It too belonged to the caliph. Then he took Azerbayjan, which was held by Uzbek, and attacked the Georgians, whom he defeated and harassed. Later he made war on al-Ashraf, lord of Khilât, and then on ‘Alâ’ al-Dîn, ruler of Anatolia, and on the Ismâ‘îlîs, whose lands he ravaged and many of whom he killed. He imposed upon them an annual tribute in money and also on others. Every prince abandoned him and would not take his hand.
He is described as endowed with the highest intellect and a superhuman willpower , which enabled him to unite heterogeneous Turkic and Mongolian tribes into a single whole .
Mongol conquering the world... India, Southeast Asia, Japan, Mediterranean, western Europe, Nordic countries, Arabian peninsula, Oceania, pacific islands, Antarctica, Arctic, Africa, Caribbean, North & south America: so we're in the moon then?
your comment is laughable, at that time, many of the places you mentioned were not even discovered, so how could Mongols conquer them? In case of Japan, the typhoons saved them from destruction. In case of India, Genghis considered it holy and that's why he never invaded it(even his successors made no such efforts and many of the invasions done were by scout armies returning after looting elsewhere rather than planned attacks), they tried invading north africa after capturing Damascus but mongolian civil war saved Egypt and land further, again the huge swathes of Mediterranean lands in the middle east and turkey was conquered, Arabian peninsula did not have enough incentives(apart from religious significance) to invade, western europe and nordic nations were saved due to great distances from the empire and would be difficult to reach given the short timespan of Mongol empire. The only place that successfully resisted the mongols were Southeast Asians
I did not speak the mocking words. I spoke the mocking words. He spoke the mocking words. They were the mocking words that were spoken. Mocking words were spoken by him. He spoke the mocking words. There were mocking words spoken. I did not speak the mocking words. Mocking words.
How different do you think the world would be if the Mongol empire never existed how many countries in people with benefits that’s a very interesting what if
The mongol conquest and the subsequent trade network it established is indirectly linked with the spread of the printing press from China to Europe. You can also see that with anything with "Tartan" or "Tartar" in the name; "Tartar" was what Europeans called the Mongols for most of history. Despite the notion that the Mongols were barbaric despoilers and ravagers popularized after the Enlightenment, for most of history after the conquest the Mongols were primarily the world's first multinational corporation. I want to be clear that this isn't an attempt to be, like, "actually, the Mongol conquests were good, because we got tartar sauce out of it;" that'd be moronic. My point is only that the legacy of the Mongol empire, and of Genghis Khan, is more complicated than it is often portrayed as being nowadays. In particular I think it's very strange how we often talk about them today in comparison to how we talk about the Roman empire, which was just as prone to wars of annihilation. You also hear a lot about things like them launching plague-ridden cows or whatever into cities, but there's very limited evidence that they actually did that (many of the sources in question are Christian monks who seem as offended by their religion as by their supposed barbarity), and also, like, it's often presented like it's something that European nations in the same period weren't also doing? Sorry for the rant; I know I'm basically blowing two words in this post out of proportion. The double-standard between the treatment of Rome and Alexander the Great vs. similar 'eastern' conquerors is just very strange to me.
honestly, I depise them, but again it's hard to judge people who lived in a completely different environnment, they were shaped by how hostile the world was to them and reacted accordingly. Still I'm not sure why some people admire them or other conquerors, they caused untold suffering for no other reason but their ego
In a strictly historical sense, however, it is most frequently used for the Turkic (mainly Kipchak) tribes who constituted the bulk of the Mongol army that invaded Russia in the early thirteenth century.
Play War and Order today: bit.ly/3P4xNpv
Redeem your gift via Account, Exchange Gift and enter code: VoicesofthePast. Valid until June 17th 2022.
I’m a Mongolian and I really would love to know what english translation you used in this video.
I like how you take the time and effort to pronounce foreign names properly.
Pronounce your ks
Ppupp
PS lol
Imagine sitting in a tent and talking about whether to invade Korea, or Europe, or the Middle East, in the 13th century. Way before Age of Industrialization, or even the Age of Sail.
Imagine failing to capture a single castle in both Hungary and Poland, imagine failing to conquer backward Japan, imagine losing against mamluks,imagine not being able to conquer a single part of India 😭😭😭
Mongols empire aka the most overrated empire of all time
@@theentertainmentnation4694 Shhh, its ok to be envious, I understand.
@@theentertainmentnation4694, Japan- The storm/hurricane helped Japan. Mamluks- They were fucking badass and at that time the most formidable fighting units so yea fair enough. India- Chingis Khan saw no reason to invade them and when his grandchildren decided to invade later, the Army was a mere shadow of what it used to be under Chingis Khan and The Mobgolian tactics were outdated. All in all the Mongols were still very savage and brutal and they had no real reason to kill Hungarians, Iranian, and so on but the Mongols were not overrated, maybe a bit too cruel but most Empires around that time and before also were kinda cruel.
@Abdullah Bhatti Apparently you have never read Medieval history. Killing babies and old people was popular way before the Mongols. Both Muslims and Christians did that.
@@theentertainmentnation4694 largest empire ever at the time sure they weren't perfect but they did better than u ever did lol
It's darkly amusing that the story begins and ends with no less then Genghis Khan falling off of his horse and having to be hospitalized: it really does happen to the best of us.
It also says something for the loyalty of his troops, that they didn't desert or overthrow him in this moment of seeming weakness.
well treated
A Khal who can't ride is no Khal.
Car crashes of the time.
@@notevenjoe genghis was quite literally the stallion that mounts the world
Yup, that and getting castrated by the daughter of someone emperor you killed.
"There is no warrior like [Yesügei] Bahadur, and no one else possesses the skills he had, but he did not suffer from hardship and was not affected by hunger or thirst. He thought his liege men could tolerate hardship as well as he could, but they couldn't. A man is worthy of leadership who knows what hunger and thirst are and who can judge the condition of others thereby, who can go at a measured pace and not allow the soldiers to get hungry and thirsty or the horses to get worn out."
- Chinggis Khan
(The Mongol Art of War - Timothy May)
He said that about his own father?
There is a named Yesugen and Yesui sister. They were queens of chinggis khaan
True, a leader cant just master his limits , he needs to understand others’ limits, to properly guide people without crushing morale.
Get off his nuts already
“Who can’t stop drinking may get drunken three times a month. If he does it more often, he is guilty. To get drunken twice a month is better; once, still more praiseworthy. But not to drink at all - what could be better than this? But where could such a being be found? But if one would find it, it would be worthy of all honour.”
― Genghis Khan
"Cannabis is better anyways." -someone who wasn't a tyrannical conqueror
@@crazypath573 Nah bro, those Sufi Safavid conquerors were high on grass 24/7
He found and killed millions of them in the Muslim world.
Genghis, stop going west right now. You're not going to like what you find
Alcohol Anonymous....13th century
You nailed the tone for this. Unspeakable violence set against beauty of the pale steppe.
Yours is amongst the best of the best
Stop looking for attention
Drop more videos ,i have been waiting for over a month
@@patrickjuma1373 the next one is coming along wonderfully, but production has been slow as we both have full-time jobs. We are jumping into TH-cam full-time in July, so expect much more regular uploads then
@@HistoryDose that is what i am talking about!!!can hardly wait ,I wish u the best in this new phase of your careers🤞🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿cheers
As someone who’s always wanted too travel back in time to witness historic empires & events, this channel using the narration of historical accounts, makes me feel like I’m sitting at a fire with the Mongol’s sharing stories 🌌. What an amazing channel.
I used to want to travel back in time too. That is until I started watching videos like these.
you do realize you would be captured and killed in a horrific manner
TO, as in going TO. Not too, as in too big, too far, etc dopey 😐
@@jimmyohara2601 Too means also. English much?
If you liked this the I recommend you listen to Dan Carlin's Wrath of the Khans podcast series. They'll blow you away
Great job at pronouncing the names. The Mongolian language isn't easy, especially that of 800 years ago, but I notice that some youtubers don't even seem to try. It really makes the video quality that much better when the creator/narrator pays attention to the names of those he's narrating.
@Louie P It wasn't sarcasm. He actually did a good job
@Louie P Condescension where?
@Erqĭn Məmbetjanuli 🇰🇿 Q̆iyat That's because Mongol was not initially an ethnicity, it was an identity-- and Turks adopted that identity. Also, to call him Şınğıs Xan is just linguistically wrong, even for Orqun Turkish. His name was Chinggis Qağan
....? I mean I'm pretty sure this isn't pronouncing it accoridng tot he rponounciaiton of 800 years ago. This is just adding emphasis and making the [x] guttural, it isi what english-only spekaers *imagine* what these languages sound like and that it takes some kind of great effort and 'difficulty' to do physically pronounce it, some kind of intrinsic 'difficulty'
Age doesn't make ti harder or easier, and ease depends on the person and previous knowledge
@@mareksicinski3726 Yeah, modern mongolian is quite a bit different than classical mongolian. However, better to pronounce it like some form of mongolian rather than not at all.
Also, its not just the "x" that I was talking about. The vowels and syllabic stress also make a difference
'He killed them until they were like heaps of rotten logs' is such a chilling slimily.
Simile*
Smile**
Sillime*
Slime***
Love it
It’s unbelievable how the destruction of empires is given the honour of one or two paragraphs
To the Empires it was the worst and last days of their existence. To the Mongols,it was Tuesday 😂
Just another day at the office
Even Assyrians weren't that brief. Either Mongols didn't really care about it or they were so confident. I think they didn't really care. WAAAAARGH!
"From what I have seen, the one thing that people are least willing to give up is the desire to become a leader of others. You will see a person give up eating and drinking excessively; he will abandon wealth and expensive clothing. But when we assign him a position of leadership, he stands up and becomes antagonistic, defensive and ambitious"
-Sufyān al-Thawrī [d.778 CE]
@Black Lesbian Poet still stuck in 2013?
@Black Lesbian Poet your mama
@Black Lesbian Poet Keep trying to make people look bad lol
@Black Lesbian Poet Lord of Da Kangz liv in da Ghettoshire.
@Black Lesbian Poet imaging making a racist troll account to spam WE WUZ memes. What a sad pathetic life
“Khatun (queen) is one of the most authoritative and magnificent words in the Mongolian language. It conveys regality, stateliness, and great strength. If something resists breaking no matter how much pressure is applied, it is described as khatun. The word can form part of a boy’s or girl’s names, signifying power and firmness combined with beauty and grace. Because of the admitted qualities of khatun, men have often borne names such as Khatun Temur, literally ‘Queen Iron’, and Khatun Baatar, 'Queen Hero’.”
― Jack Weatherford
Hatun is a respectable word for woman in turkish.
Also used as a title sometimes for women.
Khatun isn't a Mongol word. Whenever you see Khatun it's usually a Turkic bride. Khatun is the female equivalent of lord or sir. Same for Batur and Temur. Temur is the Turkic word for Iron. Those aren't Mongol words, titles and names.
Genghis Khan's real name was Timujin. Which means Ironsmith in Turkic languages. His father gave him that name after he defeated a Turkic rival. He respected his enemy so much he named his own son after him.
Central Asian people had a lot of influences from each other. But the prevalence for Turkic titles and people's in the Mongol army isn't surprising. Most of the tribes he "unified" were Turk, not Mongol. The army of Genghis largely consisted of Turkic troops. The Turkic people refused were slaughtered.
Hence when the Mongol empire fell, it splintered into smaller Turkic empires and gave rise to other Turkic empires. No one adopted Mongol while Turkic remained the dominant language in the central Asian steppes and beyond.
@@godofchaoskhorne5043 yeah most “mongol” troops that went west were Turkic I think
Yasss khatun
@@godofchaoskhorne5043 It is still a word in the Mongolian language, so he is technically correct. Also, his explanation on the meaning of Khatun is also correct.
The art shown on this video is fantastic, particularly the horses, which is not surprising. 🐎
Temujin (Chingis Khan) was sold into slavery to Tanguts when he was young man. He escaped and survived and later became a great khan of mongols. Tanguts treated him bad as a slave and were always arrogant towards mongols as they saw them as savages. Although culturally rich and more developed Tanguts still fell. And we see this pattern throughout history over and over. Arrogance of a more developed nation towards lesser one leads to demise of the first.
Never be arrogant.
Or as mongols say “Never treat a small kitten badly it might grow into a mighty tiger” ☝️
@@chinaboss6683 It might never wake up...
This is just fake, Genghis was a slave to the Merkits, fellow Mongols not Tanguts
Sorry bro I am Mongolian, just correction Temujin ( Chingis Khaan) captured by Taichuud not Tanguut . Taichuud which means kind of lords in ancient Mongol language. Taichuud were Mongol tribe kind of blood relatives with Chingis Khaan. If you still hesitated on this . Mongolian secret history.
20:55 If I understand this correctly, Ogodei chose him to die because he tried to usurp the throne while Ogodei was sick, and then the guy basically accepted his fate and said, "You need to do a better job organizing your empire," thus foreshadowing how the Khaganate split into 4.
Wrong, the history got it wrong. Ogodei did not choose him rather when asked no one approached but Tolui his younger brother. Tolui was not a traitor or usurper, he was the most loyal and respected- his martial prowess, and actions speaks louder then words sacrificed himself for the greater good to show others of the length his lineage the Toluid are welling to go in order to preserve and maintain unshakable order in the mongol court. It’s incorrect to announce him a usurper, story prob got change from the original so as to sow discord in the mongol court, opposite of the true meaning.
@@xiongjacob2739 u think hmong existed in this time?
Yeah I was trying to decifer what the narrator was conveying. Sounds like the prince gave back leadership once he knew Ogodei
had awaken by faining drunk. But maybe its was all test from the start that altimately got his brother(the prince) poisoned.
Spirituality and it's power does exist, if you don't acknowledge that then I'm afraid you lack insight
@@Naga-s2inope
These videos are so interesting and yet incredibly relaxing also.
Tell that to the Tangut people.
@@klmeco nothing more relaxing than a bit of casual genocide
I listen to them before bed all the time
I love these videos. If you close your eyes and listen it’s almost like you were there with them. Thanks for making these.
Mongol perspective - conquer it, recruit it, when in doubt kill it.
isn’t there a burning the place down part?
@@gracie99999 that's a family passtime activity not a stratagem
You have the most incredible voice, listening to your pronunciation is superb 👌
I was having a tough day until I saw you posted a new video. Thank you for such a great channel!
Have been listening to the History of China podcast and the Mongol episodes are my favourite. The unstoppable might of the Golden Horde is truly awe inspiring.
Really a section of history that is criminally untold.
Ohh, the inspirations of mass murder and plunder 😻
@@Cecil_Auguspfp fits
@@Cecil_Auguswe never inslaved anyone and caused genoicide based on religion colour of a skin we never did these things never
@@ka3axka370 enslavement Im not sure, but genocide due to skin or religion has happened..
@@Cecil_Augus genoicide means when you identify certain group of people based on the colour of skin or ethnicity like the German did in WW2 to slavs Jews and roman during ruling of Green Khan non of this existed
it is nice to hear someone call Chinggis Khaan the correct modern title with the correct modern pronunciation
The correct way to pronounce any name is in the language rules of the people doing the talking. I laugh my ass off when village idiots try to insult somebody who doesn't pronounce a name in that persons native language. Most people cant reproduce the sounds made by many languages. The UK and the USA share the term schedule but its pronounced very differently by both and the correct way for an American to pronounce it is exactly how they pronounce it as they do in the USA. for example no matter how much wimpy Iranians complain that as Americans we pronounce their country Eye ran. We wont pronounce it E ron. Them whining about it only shows how weak they are. Whining is a sign of weakness.
@@pauldorfman701 Chinggis Khaan can be said perfectly in english and american. also why are you wasting your time writing a paragraph to someone who really dosnt care much, its not very smart. sidenote, Americans pronounce things wrong
Thank you for pronouncing his name properly!
I really love all that effort you put into your animation and narration, but as ESL i wish there was subtitles that aren't generated so that i can follow through the dialogue
I can't fall asleep without these videos
Another excellent video
“I have become drunk” is my new saying.
"...that will be fine." Don't know why, but that made me laugh.
'Why is the comment section full of quotes?'
- Me
it’s quotation day
Cringe fascism
Wow the pronunciation of Mongolian names is very good
2:09 Interesting tidbit that reminded me of something fascinating my old history lecturer explained regarding Medieval societies.
Their obsession with not bearing insults and quickness to respond with violence can seem laughable by modern standards.
Almost all (men) of the age were obsessed with status.
But if you understand the context, it's not a case of thin skin, nor is it as illogical and juvenile as it might appear.
Societies of the time (whether settled in castles of living nomadic lives on the steppe) were extremely unstable, violent places where privacy was a luxury and in physical security tenuous.
People were only ever safe through playing a role within the group and because those groups either hid behind castle walls, in small villages or even smaller tents, these groups tended to form very rigid group hierarchies. Within these hierarchies, everyone was watching everyone else at all times; enforcing norms, strict rules and traditions.
This in turn ensured the unity and security of the group.
If you had a place in the group, then you could ride with the raiders or hide in the lord's keep when those raiders approached.
However, if you didn't the world was a very dangerous place.
So, what people in your group thought about you, mattered more than anything else.
It was existential to everyone, even the guys at the top... in fact, especially the guys at the top.
This is why wars were literally fought over nothing more than petty insults at times.
Any slight on your honour, a worry of appearing weak or even the slightest insult; would be seen by the subject as a direct threat to their position within society and therefore a threat on their life, which could only be defended with violence.
This in turn perpetuated the constant state of violence that marked the age, making it more dangerous for anyone not in one of these rigid hierarchical societies (anyone on 'the outside') and reinforced the entire vicious cycle, for hundreds of years.
very very well said
Not to mention that if the defacto ruler of an area openly allows an insult to his person to go unpunished, especially the type of insult that implies NOT giving the support of men that the ruler demands, then said ruler will show weakness.
If you do not reprimand reckless, ambitious upstarts within your own territory, then word of your weakness will spread, which will cause more upstarts to rebel all across your territory.
It really isn't about personal honour in such a case, it's about maintaining what control over a fundamentally very volatile situation you can have. Having a vast empire comes at the cost of oversight. Rebellions from ambitious lords are to be quelled, not allowed to fester.
The open insult and refusal to give aid, was as much a declaration of war as is possible. They likely thought themselves capable of handling the Khan army, spread thin like all imperial armies are, and thereby underestimated their enemy. Ghengis did what was neccesary here, though destroying the enemy's people entirely is exceptionally cruel. That cruelty, however, serves as a lesson: "don't rebel, or you and yours won't see the end of the year."
George RR Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" has an excellently realistic example, though fictional, of the same situation, in the form of the young Lord Tywin Lannister, who responded to open threats and insults of his house by destroying all traces of the castameres, who refused to pay tribute to the Lannisters when demanded.
Those threats and insults were only possible because his father was a weakling, a coward, and somebody who avoided conflict rather than attempting to solve it. So Tywin had to pick up the pieces. If he didn't do this, the situation would only have gotten worse, and other petty lords would have eventually rebelled as well. The genocide he committed is very cruel, but serves as the most effective reminder of what House Lannister does to rebels.
As you said, medieval life, especially in areas of great conflict, was short, brutal and volatile. There is no other way, put simply, to deal with traitors and rebels, than brutal reprimand. You shouldn't let the wound fester.
Sounds like prison
Thank you for these stories, it really is a nice way to start a day with such tales, being so close to history. Have a nice weekend everyone.
These stories are worthy additions to be shown in age of empires games.
Outstanding, simply outstanding.
When you hear about Ghengis Khan, even his childhood sounds like a myth, his words and actions like a wrathful God. How could one not be enthralled to follow such a man?
"When Genghis Khan looks at you, you feel as though you will vanish if he looks away"
It’s like Augustus, there is a Roman story by the Emperor Julian that when presented to the gods most of the emperors were ignored but Augustus was pointed out by Zeus himself as his closest imitator.
@@historyrepeat402 yeah... that can be taken _any fucking number_ of ways if you give it a couple of seconds...
...or face death?
"I rose from my bed and found the world made of men of soft flesh."
Hard men lead the mongols. Soft men lead the people they conquered. Hard leaders make hard men if they are good leaders. Soft leaders always promote soft men.
Hehe Boi
@@JohnSmith-sb2fp Not always...
I absolutely love that you have made this video with the Mongoliin Nuutz Tovichoi but I have to remind you that the content in that book is not 100% from legitimate sources and over time "by the Chinese" could have likely been altered and more of romanticized many times over👌
I listened carefully to the explanation of the world conquest of the Hyperpower Mongol Empire, which had the world's strongest military power. I was studying a world history textbook and it was helpful.
세계최강의 군사력을 자랑한 세계최강대국 몽골제국의 세계정복사에 대한 설명을 잘들었습니다. 세계사 교과서에서 공부중인데 참고가 되었습니다.
Years ago I worked with a couple fresh off the boat Mongolian guys at a warehouse. They were very proud of their heritage and eager to live up to their aggressive reputation. Unfortunately for them, our Hispanic coworkers didn't care. The two groups eventually clashed and the Mongolians were outnumbered and got beat. Didn't see them again after that.
Lmao what were their names?
@@fybrogen7473 Did I say something funny? Or are you just another butt-hurt Mongolian who's been taught since birth that you're the world's toughest people?
This was over a decade ago. The only thing I remember about them is that they lived in Santa Fe Springs, CA and we worked for a window replacement company. The younger one was constantly bragging in broken English about how tough Mongolians are. They were quick to escalate even small misunderstandings to threats of violence. It was after one of these misunderstandings that they got beat and ran away.
where was this
Hispanics grouping up because they cant fight one on one? Get outta here...they would never do such a thing....
Mongols today are nowhere near as close as those of 13th century
There were 4 nations which have managed to defeat the 1200's Mongols in war ; Javanese (Majapahit), Turks (Khalji & Bahri Mamluks), Japanese, Vietnamese (Dai Viet). Mongols of the first half of the 13th century however were invincible
Some kingdoms in Northern India fought them off too.
funny how pathetic they are nowadays tho 🤦🏼♀️
The Japanese were able to control the weather?
@@FunkyAve69 I think it’s another group of people who do that.
@@82dorrin example?
its hard to imagine their casual relationship with death & brutality
I want a show about Subutai so badly I find him endlessly interesting
Been reading a lot on Central Asia lately. Wonderful.
Wonderful channel and video, thank you very much ❤
Was *genocide* even a concept during GK's lifetime? Did it serve to *prevent* war retribution from future generations?
The best way to ensure successful propaganda is to separate the youngest generation from all others and radicalize them
Your voice is soooo soothing (:
One of the reasons why the Mongols were so brutal and merciless was because they almost never tasted defeat.
They didn't fear that anyone could possibly come and execute revenge for the slaughter of all the civilians because they basically thought they could not be defeated.
It took a long time before some people like the Mamluks and East Europeans figured out how to fight them
Thanks. I would like more information about early Mongol mindset, especially with regard to cities.
Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World is a good read, the early chapters of Genghis's life and the clan nations uniting is cool enough. But it covers city raiding in the south intimately, and it sorta followed thusly: "We found a outpost with 3 meter high walls. It was difficult to take, but when we took it we made sure to capture and spare the engineer who maintained these walls. Next we had a town with 4 meter high walls. Rinse, repeat. Better engineer. Small city wall. R&R. Large City wall. R&R. Capital wall, ect."
TLDR: The Mongols just sorta assumed that if it kept working, it was "Free Real Estate"
Excellent work. Thank you.
Excellent all around! I especially enjoyed the music!
This is why almost everyone should have a diary. After your diary can become the eye witness of the past in the distant future.
4:30 the Khan recruitment system is exactly the same as the Cossack recruitment system of several hundred years later
Probably from who russians learnt imperialism from.
Spoken as if it was a story handed down over several generations, even many centuries.
Blessed by the eternal sky,
Born of the steppe,
Everywhere in blue-skied Mongolia,
His name resounds in the world,
The courageous Mongol Genghis,
The sublime lord Genghis.
Even in burning wounds,
A mind strong as steel,
Like temporal swords,
As powerful as a planetary bird,
The courageous Mongol Genghis,
The sublime lord Genghis.
Blessed by the sky above,
Possessed half the world,
Engrained is his spirit,
In the majestic and mighty world.
The courageous Mongol Genghis,
The sublime lord Genghis.
The father of all genghis
Ancient song in praise of our Great Lord Chinggis Khan
th-cam.com/video/p_5yt5IX38I/w-d-xo.html
*HOH TENGEREES ZAYASAAAAN*
A mass murderer.
Came here for the Wild Asses, stayed for the conquest.
Excellent love ur channel
Thank you voices of the past , you truly are my favourite utube channel .
"We got good at conquering from playing War and Order!! HAHA!!!"
-13th Century Mongols
There were 4 nations which have managed to defeat the 1200's Mongols in war ; Javanese (Majapahit), Turks (Khalji & Bahri Mamluks), Japanese, Vietnamese (Dai Viet). Mongols of the first half of the 13th century however were unstoppable
Major nations destroyed by the Mongols ;
-Jin(Tungusic)
-Khwarezmids(Turkic)
-Souther Song(Sinitic)
-Kara Khitais(Khitanic)
-Cumania(Turkic)
-Kievan Rus(Germanic and Slavic)
-Seljuk Rum(Turkic)
-Abbasids(Arabic)
-Western Xia(Qiangic)
-Volga Bulgaria(Turkic)
The Mongol Empire was tolerant of other religions and practiced a variety of them, ..(also language..)
They didn’t force anyone…
May I get the background song that is being played around at 11:00?
Never break your word to the mongols
That’s amazing never have I thought of this
Still love watching this
Imagine if Genghis Khan met Jingus Han
I wonder if temu is named after him
“A blue wolf took as his spouse a fallow doe, they settled at the head of the Onan river, and there were born the Mongols”
"Just as the mongols tore across Asia in the early 13th century" Isn't it amazing that we could say something so casually, especially when advertising an app game about an event that killed perhaps millions of people. Imagine, advertising a game like "Just as the Germans tore across Europe in the mid 20th century you too can build a Reich to wipe out your enemies.Even H!tler didn't have a dragon!"
it could happen in 800 years
Imagine saying something about the jews and holocaust oh boy
"I want to trade."
"No. Arrested and executed."
What the hell was Khwarezm's problem?
Arrogance
love this
I was literally thinking of this topic few days last
Chormaqan was one of the great commanders of the mongols
Sounds Uzbek
@@hattusilli2225 technically uzbeks didnt exist back then it was turkic kwarizian empire...chirmaqan was from mongol tribe
Énorme boulot pour faire une synthèse pareille
Genghis Khan got nothing on this Chingus Han guy.
so chingus Jan is real
Dingus John
How do you get the source materials for this video??
I just listened to some Mongolian rock and now I'm ready to conquer the world 🌎
was it good and whom?
well for what it’s worth, considering some are deeply effected by the past and what happened to their ancestors and is reflected
in their behavior and sense of being.
High time to get the narrative straight cause we don’t want the past to influence us so
and have people suffering the consequences
of those we weren’t connected to in action.
“hey kid you ain’t the only ones, everybody went thro this in one form or shape and btw..
prime example our current status is one
we all [politicians included and the like] face
the end of us
@@gracie99999 what on earth are you talking about and to whom i might add.
"Git gud, noobs!"
-13th Century Mongols to the people they conquered. Probably.
Bloody brilliant comment broham.
"Skill Issue"
- Mongols when their enemies lament.
Thumbnail photo?
Is it just a coincidence that Kitat sounds like Hittite?
Yes. The term "Hittite" comes from the city of Hattusa, in modern-day Turkey. Kitat was a term used to refer to the Jin Chinese.
Thank you, however I’m rarely sold on answers that appear so sure. Let’s say there’s no evidence to link them necessarily, but that can change.
@@The3Basics Things sounding similar but being completely unrelated is quite a common occurrence.
Sure, but things sounding similar and being related is also common, so that logic isn’t going to hold here.
@@The3Basics Except there's nothing that actually links these two extremely different cultures.
Genghis Khan: I saw, I conquered, I came.
I don’t know why his enemies were so bold after every campaign he has completed
The history Brothers. Might as well own it. It's not conceded if it's true
Chilling.
The Mongols are staging a comeback, so watch your selves,
History Bros strike again!
Mangburni is considered a fearless leader and a great warrior.[3] Harold Lamb describes Jalal al-Din as "valiant son of a weak father",[37] Carl Sverdrup descibes Jalal al-Din as "brave and energetic".[4] Jürgen Paul describes Jalal al-Din as "the mighty wall". About his battle against Genghis khan at the banks of the Indus, Osborne describes him as the first vigilante enemy of Genghis khan[38] while Timothy May describes him as the most stalwart enemy of the Mongols in West Asia untill the time of the Mamluk Sultanate.[3] Modern scholarship credits him with halting the Mongol expansion by at least a decade.
Shihab al-Din Muhammad al-Nasawi, the personal secretary of the Sultan Jalal ad-Din, described him as follows:
He was swarthy (dark-skinned), small in stature, Turkic in "behavior" and speech, but he also spoke Persian. As for his courage, I have mentioned it many times when describing the battles he took part in. He was a lion among lions and the most fearless among his valiant horsemen. He was mild in his temper though, did not get easily provoked and never used bad language.[39]
The Georgian Royal Annals from the 13th century described Jalal al-Din as follows:
...the Sultan Jalaldin - valorous and brave, courageous and fearless like some immaterial being, superb, strong and an excellent fighter, came to the rescue of his father with a 5 small group of soldiers, picked him up, and together they fled to Khorasan.[40]
In Tabaqat-i Nasiri, Juzjani describes Jalal al-Din as follows:
Sultan Jalal ud-Din, Mangburni, was the eldest son of Sultan Muhammad, and was endowed with great heroism, valour and high talents and accomplishments.[7]
In The Complete History, Ibn al-Athir described Jalal al-Din as follows:[41]
...Jalâl al-Dîn whom all the princes on earth held in awe and feared.
At the end of the battle of the Indus, Genghis khan said the following about Jalal al-Din:[42][10][43][37]
A father should only have such a son. Whether he escaped from the fiery battlefield and came to the brink of salvation from the whirlwind of destruction, great deeds and great revolts will still come from him!
Though considered a successful warrior and a general, Jalal al-Din is considered a poor ruler and his loss of re-established empire to the Mongol is attributed to the poor rulership of him. Jalal al-Din had enmity with all of his neighbours which resulted in Jalal's calls to form alliance against the Mongol army of Chormaqan being dismissed by all other Muslim kingdoms. Though historians agree that Jalal al-Din inherited these enmities from his father and predecessros.[1][3] Ibn al-Athir described Jalal al-Din as follows in regard to his ruling:[44]
Jalâl al-Dîn was a bad ruler who administered his realm abominably. Among the princes who were his neighbours he did not leave one without showing hostility to him and challenging him for his kingdom, acting as a bad neighbour. As an example of that, as soon as he appeared in Isfahan and gathered an army, he invaded Khuzistan and besieged Tustar, a possession of the caliph. He marched to Daquqa, which he sacked and where he killed many people. It too belonged to the caliph. Then he took Azerbayjan, which was held by Uzbek, and attacked the Georgians, whom he defeated and harassed. Later he made war on al-Ashraf, lord of Khilât, and then on ‘Alâ’ al-Dîn, ruler of Anatolia, and on the Ismâ‘îlîs, whose lands he ravaged and many of whom he killed. He imposed upon them an annual tribute in money and also on others. Every prince abandoned him and would not take his hand.
He is described as endowed with the highest intellect and a superhuman willpower , which enabled him to unite heterogeneous Turkic and Mongolian tribes into a single whole .
Pregun powder wars are always awesome to here.
I really need this soundtrack, what are the songs please!!!!
bravo!
well it was written as a legendary account long after it happened
Mongol conquering the world...
India, Southeast Asia, Japan, Mediterranean, western Europe, Nordic countries, Arabian peninsula, Oceania, pacific islands, Antarctica, Arctic, Africa, Caribbean, North & south America: so we're in the moon then?
Then the Mongols disappeared in the mist. The Mongols that have survived now fear annexation by China.
your comment is laughable, at that time, many of the places you mentioned were not even discovered, so how could Mongols conquer them? In case of Japan, the typhoons saved them from destruction. In case of India, Genghis considered it holy and that's why he never invaded it(even his successors made no such efforts and many of the invasions done were by scout armies returning after looting elsewhere rather than planned attacks), they tried invading north africa after capturing Damascus but mongolian civil war saved Egypt and land further, again the huge swathes of Mediterranean lands in the middle east and turkey was conquered, Arabian peninsula did not have enough incentives(apart from religious significance) to invade, western europe and nordic nations were saved due to great distances from the empire and would be difficult to reach given the short timespan of Mongol empire. The only place that successfully resisted the mongols were Southeast Asians
I did not speak the mocking words.
I spoke the mocking words.
He spoke the mocking words.
They were the mocking words that were spoken.
Mocking words were spoken by him.
He spoke the mocking words.
There were mocking words spoken.
I did not speak the mocking words.
Mocking words.
Never heard of Jingus Hahn.
same
Neither have I, until I heard someone say that's how Genghis Khan is pronounced in the Mongolian language.
How different do you think the world would be if the Mongol empire never existed how many countries in people with benefits that’s a very interesting what if
The mongol conquest and the subsequent trade network it established is indirectly linked with the spread of the printing press from China to Europe. You can also see that with anything with "Tartan" or "Tartar" in the name; "Tartar" was what Europeans called the Mongols for most of history. Despite the notion that the Mongols were barbaric despoilers and ravagers popularized after the Enlightenment, for most of history after the conquest the Mongols were primarily the world's first multinational corporation.
I want to be clear that this isn't an attempt to be, like, "actually, the Mongol conquests were good, because we got tartar sauce out of it;" that'd be moronic. My point is only that the legacy of the Mongol empire, and of Genghis Khan, is more complicated than it is often portrayed as being nowadays. In particular I think it's very strange how we often talk about them today in comparison to how we talk about the Roman empire, which was just as prone to wars of annihilation. You also hear a lot about things like them launching plague-ridden cows or whatever into cities, but there's very limited evidence that they actually did that (many of the sources in question are Christian monks who seem as offended by their religion as by their supposed barbarity), and also, like, it's often presented like it's something that European nations in the same period weren't also doing?
Sorry for the rant; I know I'm basically blowing two words in this post out of proportion. The double-standard between the treatment of Rome and Alexander the Great vs. similar 'eastern' conquerors is just very strange to me.
@@Oops-All-Ghosts Is that how they got the name for Tartar sauce?
Could you do more about Turks or of the memoirs of Evliya Çelebi?
honestly, I depise them, but again it's hard to judge people who lived in a completely different environnment, they were shaped by how hostile the world was to them and reacted accordingly.
Still I'm not sure why some people admire them or other conquerors, they caused untold suffering for no other reason but their ego
If Ghengis was in that same position and the Shamans asked him to sacrifice a close family member I bet he doesn’t do it.
You go so fast with the names it's not easy to keep up
when i watched this, it had 6 comments, 25 likes, and 3 views...?
well that was 12 days ago
@@gracie99999 my point was, that there were 22 more likes than views at that time, and that implies bot-action............good day
Ghengis: I’m gonna rule the world!
The Memluks of Egypt: Nahhhh!
In a strictly historical sense, however, it is most frequently used for the Turkic (mainly Kipchak) tribes who constituted the bulk of the Mongol army that invaded Russia in the early thirteenth century.