A true mixed battle could work. Just put a capture point or two in the water so the ships have something more to do than bombard tanks. Make coastal capture zones that have naval guns to combat ships while still having some inland out of range of naval vessels. Aircraft remain unchanged and just hit what they can if they manage to get past the ship gunner ai and SPAAs
I remember playing an old PC game back in the early 2000s called Aces High where ground, naval, and air were all on the same map together and could interact with each other. The maps were massive though. It took me over an hour to fly from one end to the other in a B-17, and I had to shut off two engines to conserve enough fuel to make the trip. I think something like that would be amazing for a world war mode in War Thunder rather than the current format, but I imagine it would also need some massive server support.
A good map would probably be the Denmark straight. You could even do an alternate history of the battle of dunkirk where one team is trying to defend the beaches and attack back into France and the other is trying to push them back out to sea.
Yeah but imagine the frustration of completely destroying the enemy team in land but your ships are incompetent and result in losing the match because they never bothered to cap points.
@@Gannet-S.4honestly I would be more frustrated by the naval artillery. If people thought CAS was bad, then just wait until some dude starts dropping salvos of 203+mm HE every twenty seconds
Naval and tanks could be like a beach landing scenario. Ships need to defend themselves while trying to destroy shore artillery or bases, tanks operate as normal.
When i first heard about the "world war" event on war thunder this is what i imagined. Once naval starts getting into 8.0+ we could start seeing helicopters... So this just seems like natural progression imo.
Q: Could we see more experimental/prototype tanks from WWII or even post war. Like the ISU-152-1 or ISU-152-2 for example. Or could we see a return of older tanks previously removed like the Tiger 10.5cm and panther two, maybe as an event or bring them back once a year with the maus.
Question: The BT series had the ability to drive without tracks due to it's suspension setup. Is there any hidden model in the game or will there? Could you maybe add this feature if not?
Will artillery SPG's ever be able to be used as actual artillery? There is so much possibility with that, especially if you add things other than HE rounds. I also find the aspect of the arty call in being done by actual players really cool
@@dezydereusz No, because that's just HE and I paid for better HE, and a bunch of shitty systems in an honestly worsening mediocre game. Since War Thunder goes the more realistic route, there's many more options. Two basic examples using different ammo types being the ability to fire smoke rounds to cover allies advances, and STAR shells on night maps to illuminate the area. That's just the bare basics though. I could go on, but we'd be here all week.
I know its maybe not realistic, but maybe it could be an option for Naval AB, that vessels have an anchor skill. So a ship can drop an anchor and can stop then way faster. Like sometimes it takes sooo long, until you can reverse the direction, especially when you want to capture point or wanna dodge Torpedos this is a thing. I know that in real life it wouldnt work like this, but I guess it would be a fun addition like as a 1 time usage skill
Q: what do you think about a mode called something like "the great battle" where ships have their own capture point planes have their own point (air supperiority) and tanks have their own point
A good map would probably be the Denmark straight. You could even do an alternate history of the battle of dunkirk where one team is trying to defend the beaches and attack back into France and the other is trying to push them back out to sea.
@@Kistor306 it would need also the adition of sonars for destroyers, antisubs and some planes. Maybe adding some anti ship and subs helicopteres would work too.
That Junkers crew probably THOUGHT they got hit right before the engine caught fire, i can see a mechanical failure happening causing a jolt of vibration that might seem similar to cannon fire, also Gibson was probably sleep deprived and didn’t see the other AC or it’s tracers
I honestly believe it was some mechanical faliure, the germans did say they got a little damage in the previous engagement, that was probably enough to have things and screws losen up, then 20 minutes of vibration chucks them off completely.
Q: will you add an option on naval to repair certain things only like the main/secondary turret, engine/transmission, ammo elevator etc? as naval main, i think this could be good so ur ship wont lose crew quickly bcoz the repair button repairs everything
I love the new voice lines! I was wondering if more could be added to strengthen it, like gunner heat PC. If my commander shouted “Target Cease Fire” after a T-72 turret went sky high, I’d lose my mind…
Hey I think something is wrong with the battle pass for me? I can't see it to my right in the main lobby. The square box to the right is empty for me in the lobby screen. I can't see the battle pass or any of the objectives I have to complete for the battle pass
So War Thunder has added a movie star and famous memorial at Pearl Harbor, but they gave it a crew of landlubbers. The heart on the side of the Bf 109 G-14 being referenced is most likely JG 54's green heart.
I hope in the nxt major update you add a simple animation, tires pivoting left/right for aircraft, front wheels and tail wheels. Also, can you guys animate, that the pilot model moves his head in the direction you are looking? I mean just think where ever the our mouse view is, thats the direction the pilot moves his head! ofcourse there would be some limits on the model itself since he can't rotate the head 360*
Two questions: 1. Are there any plans to improve realism with mud and dirt? For example, tracked vehicles throwing track when trying to pivot or neutral steer in loose dirt or mud? 2. I seem to remember the internal layout of the Bradley being accurate at one point, but they were changed, particularly with the turret, to what we have now. Was this done on purpose? If so, can you divulge the reasoning behind it?
Question, why is the me 264 in the game when the mark1 model of the plane was the only one to be completely built and he did not have armor nor defense of guns, which the one in the game is the m3 that wasn’t complete why isnt the Me 262 HG-II in the game it was the Second "High Speed" variant, more heavily modified A-1a with "racing" style cockpit and wings swept at 35-degree angle and engine nacelles were moved closer to fuselage.
Q: Will you add the paper tanks back? the Tiger 2H 10.5 and Panther 2 in specific? I know they aren't real, but seeing as you've added the Yak-141, and the F-16AJ, I felt I should ask. Edit: Another question, Door Mounted Pylons were proposed for the F-16A ADF along with the F-16AJ, will we ever see that? Along with this, around the same time Japan was buying F-16s, the US was offering them along with the germans F-14s, could we possibly see this to try and expand out some air trees?
Channel suggestion: would you mind adding more intro cameo's instead of the same Leopard for the past years already! ;-; I haven't seen any other vehicles
And what's the best Battlecruiser? It must be Scharnhost, almost battleship have to deal it hardly, while it need the research point same as rp of CA 6.0 (Pittsburg) in USA's naval techtree. Next video shooting ranger Gayjin should issue a guideline how to fight against it
thinking about last comment 14:12 and the following topic of "ship vs tanks" like its pretty unfair, but the concept of combined arms operation in a single game can be done One such suitable map are the ones found in the pacific theatre, take guadalcanal (former jungle map for tanks) or Port Moresby taking a look in the air map of these versions, it could be suited for tank combat as well and my idea goes by, it would be similar to naval EC matches Ships instead of figthing over taking an enemy port, they would fight for actual naval supremacy. Air units would prove their reliability by having the option of providing CAS for tanks or striking ships to help this naval supremacy The mode would count with a player count of 32v32 just like in custom battles that would go 15 players could be located in tanks and would have multiple objectives. Start in point A, drive to this point in dispute, once you capture it, to the next one, and the losing team would have to retreat and defend and so on. These points would have bots for the loosing team while the neutral point, cental, would just have minor decorations while that tank battle is going on, planes are scrambled in an attempt to stop the advance of tanks, 10 planes could be the limit size since. They can strike ships, tanks and other planes their objectives is merely for support and to gain air superiority zones as for ships, the 7 ships remaing could fill that spot, DDs and other minor boats types could be deployed in quantity, while more heavier ships are limited. 1 battleship could be deployed at a time for example and they would fight over the naval control and could have the hability to provide naval bombardment support for tanks. But as said, at this point the match would be one sided, there are many flaws with what i said, but in my head it looks possible
When we see the introduction of the Mitsubishi F-2, will this replace the current F-16 for Japan? Like how the Object 211 in China replaced the PT-76? As Japan never used the F-16
Would it be possible for a team to receive naval fire support on maps near sea shores? Depending on br and which country is calling for support or which country would have realistic control of the sea
Gaijin actually believes that the Arizona is worth mentioning as a top battleship over the Nevada, which has significantly higher survivability due to higher number of crew.
Funny how they say Duilio lack survivability because the lack of coal deposits, ignoring the fact that ship should have the Pugliese anti-torpedo systems to give extra protection to ammo racks, but in the game they were simply too lazy to add it
Hi Gaijin, can you guys please explain how does the IOG missiles works? Like, what is the difference between them and other SARH missiles ans stuff? Thanks
Would it be possible to put the south-eastern city map into top tear air realistic battle circulation it would be fun flying through tunnels to evade in a dogfight
Why not add a tank spawn on some Naval EC maps, were A.I. ground targets spawn ? Then you could bonk the A.I. or other players in tanks. And br for planes should be different in naval modes than air rb.
The Merkavas Mk.4, Mk.3 and Mk.2D have a proximity-fused shell. You didn't use it in the video (Top MBT Thriatlon in Episode 345), for some reason. The Merkava's (From Mk.3 and above) frontal armor plate also features an internal ERA protection, making it invincible to even a hit from a DM53 120 mm APFSDS shell in the frontal armor plate. The Merkava Mk.4 is also equipped with exported DM53 shells, locally named 'Hetz-2' (Arrow-2). I hope you will add this changes to the Merkavas (Mk.3B, Mk.3C, Mk.3D - only the HE-VT (proximity fused) shells and the internal ERA; Mk.4B, Mk.4 LIC, Mk.4M - also the Arrow-2 (DM53) shell). You nerfed the Merkavas from the very begining. That's so unfair. You also need to add a softkill APS, add-on armor protection against ATGMs and a coaxial M2HB 12.7 mm machine gun to the Merkava Mk.4 LIC. You also need to add LAHAT Mk.3 ATGM to the Merkavas Mk.3 B and C and Merkava Mk.2D, The LAHAT Mk.4 ATGM to Merkavas Mk.4 B and LIC, and the LAHAT Mk.5 ATGM to the Merkava Mk.4M (LAHAT ATGM is a Spike ATGM fired from a tank gun). And if you added the Ariete AMV and the Challanger 2E, you now need to add the new Merkava Mk.4 Barak (entered the active service in the last January). Also you need to give Python-3 to Saraph, Peten and Tzefa D/E. Bibliographic sources: IMI, IAI, two colonels in the IDF, a senior officer in MANTAK (the Israeli administration of designing and producting tanks). Greetings! Yosef, an Israeli former captain in the IDF (and also a War Thunder player, for some reason) 20th time sending this comment
Gaijin really put effort to ships and water physics and I really appreciate it. It's sad that people don't play naval much.
the bots in naval is very concerning.
2 reasons: 1 bad balancing 2 insane amount of bots ruining the game mode.
Lots of bots.
i came across this behemoth in a Scharnhorst called GoonyGooGoo mofo racks up 10 15 20 a game without losing their ship!
Bots, way too hard grind, the worst maps of all gamemodes, imbalance...
A true mixed battle could work. Just put a capture point or two in the water so the ships have something more to do than bombard tanks. Make coastal capture zones that have naval guns to combat ships while still having some inland out of range of naval vessels. Aircraft remain unchanged and just hit what they can if they manage to get past the ship gunner ai and SPAAs
I remember playing an old PC game back in the early 2000s called Aces High where ground, naval, and air were all on the same map together and could interact with each other. The maps were massive though. It took me over an hour to fly from one end to the other in a B-17, and I had to shut off two engines to conserve enough fuel to make the trip. I think something like that would be amazing for a world war mode in War Thunder rather than the current format, but I imagine it would also need some massive server support.
Yeah that would be very awesome
A good map would probably be the Denmark straight. You could even do an alternate history of the battle of dunkirk where one team is trying to defend the beaches and attack back into France and the other is trying to push them back out to sea.
Yeah but imagine the frustration of completely destroying the enemy team in land but your ships are incompetent and result in losing the match because they never bothered to cap points.
@@Gannet-S.4honestly I would be more frustrated by the naval artillery. If people thought CAS was bad, then just wait until some dude starts dropping salvos of 203+mm HE every twenty seconds
Naval is actually nice but filled to the brim with bots..
The amount of SL u lose is so tragic 💀
@@Lanny.CBuy premium time
FACTS
@@Jovan007 not everyone wants to spend money on a free game
Ground BR 9.7-10.7 is also filled with bots. I really wish Gaijin would do something about the players using these shitty bots to run their accounts.
Are you planning to make fire extinguishers reloadable on captured points?
Keep a fight bro 💪💪💪
Naval and tanks could be like a beach landing scenario. Ships need to defend themselves while trying to destroy shore artillery or bases, tanks operate as normal.
ships could also act as artillery and shoot at capture points. (in theory)
When i first heard about the "world war" event on war thunder this is what i imagined.
Once naval starts getting into 8.0+ we could start seeing helicopters...
So this just seems like natural progression imo.
Q: Could we see more experimental/prototype tanks from WWII or even post war. Like the ISU-152-1 or ISU-152-2 for example. Or could we see a return of older tanks previously removed like the Tiger 10.5cm and panther two, maybe as an event or bring them back once a year with the maus.
Cant wait to see more modern battleships.
Particularly the Iowa class battleship. That would be a beast for the triathlon.
Seeing the Iowa V Bismarck V Yamato fight will be glorious in War Thunder one day
@@F0urSidedHexag0nThe Bismarck doesn’t compare to the Iowa or Yamato, HMS Vangaurd or KGV would be better and cool 😂😂😅
@@F0urSidedHexag0nthere all in war thunder mobile, aswell as submarines so they have to be coming soon
I don't see the Iowa, Yamato or Bismarck for another couple years. Have to go through earlier BB's 1st
Question: The BT series had the ability to drive without tracks due to it's suspension setup. Is there any hidden model in the game or will there? Could you maybe add this feature if not?
There is not, but I could totaly see that as a modification, like some panzers has the wider track variant, or some tanks have additional armour.
@@Nicitel94 that would pretty fun, and would be an interesting game mechanic
we want regenerative steering for all tanks who have it, we are tired of losing speed by turning.
Q: when will we see more PvE content? 2 years ago, you had the convoy mode. That was fun!
There was Sturmtiger pve event prev anniversary
As you say , it was an event
Will artillery SPG's ever be able to be used as actual artillery? There is so much possibility with that, especially if you add things other than HE rounds. I also find the aspect of the arty call in being done by actual players really cool
Could you make it where it works with drones? Like a drone pings a coordinate location and arty targets those coordinates.
do you want another world of tanks spg situation?
@@boombot3029I have seen players do that before and it can be pretty cool.
@@dezydereusz No, because that's just HE and I paid for better HE, and a bunch of shitty systems in an honestly worsening mediocre game. Since War Thunder goes the more realistic route, there's many more options. Two basic examples using different ammo types being the ability to fire smoke rounds to cover allies advances, and STAR shells on night maps to illuminate the area. That's just the bare basics though. I could go on, but we'd be here all week.
@@KeybladeMaster9913 then stop playing?
I know its maybe not realistic, but maybe it could be an option for Naval AB, that vessels have an anchor skill. So a ship can drop an anchor and can stop then way faster. Like sometimes it takes sooo long, until you can reverse the direction, especially when you want to capture point or wanna dodge Torpedos this is a thing. I know that in real life it wouldnt work like this, but I guess it would be a fun addition like as a 1 time usage skill
Q: what do you think about a mode called something like "the great battle" where ships have their own capture point planes have their own point (air supperiority) and tanks have their own point
A good map would probably be the Denmark straight. You could even do an alternate history of the battle of dunkirk where one team is trying to defend the beaches and attack back into France and the other is trying to push them back out to sea.
@@MrPanzer234 EXACTLY dunkirk !
Loved the humor of the first part xD!! had me in stitches
Q: When do you add U-boats and playable aircraftcarriers?
submarine i say yes
@@Clemdauphin Would be cool right? We have torprdos and it could work like the heli research type but with boats
@@Kistor306 it would need also the adition of sonars for destroyers, antisubs and some planes. Maybe adding some anti ship and subs helicopteres would work too.
That Junkers crew probably THOUGHT they got hit right before the engine caught fire, i can see a mechanical failure happening causing a jolt of vibration that might seem similar to cannon fire, also Gibson was probably sleep deprived and didn’t see the other AC or it’s tracers
I honestly believe it was some mechanical faliure, the germans did say they got a little damage in the previous engagement, that was probably enough to have things and screws losen up, then 20 minutes of vibration chucks them off completely.
Q: do you plan to add the F86H (PR) to the family of sabres
Q: will you add an option on naval to repair certain things only like the main/secondary turret, engine/transmission, ammo elevator etc?
as naval main, i think this could be good so ur ship wont lose crew quickly bcoz the repair button repairs everything
Q: Would you ever consider adding a gamemode made strictly for tanks only, and no cas?
what battle of the Bulge map what about a map with shithouse visibility?
Hopefully not that sounds boring
I would like to see a ground enduring confrontation mode, especially considering that we have one for naval and for helicopters already.
Bayern player here! It’s so slept on. Fire every turret separately down a ships hull. From 98% to 22 real quick!
This makes you wonder how cool it would look to play air RB at night with spotlights pointing at the skies.
It used to happen years ago on some map like Norway.
Q: Why is the UH-1 after the AH-1 in the American heli tree even though the AH-1 was based on the UH-1?
I love the new voice lines! I was wondering if more could be added to strengthen it, like gunner heat PC. If my commander shouted “Target Cease Fire” after a T-72 turret went sky high, I’d lose my mind…
It would be nice to mix tanks planes and ships on a battle. Just restric the ship size.
it's their world war mode but you gotta have level 3 on all 3 land sea and air
Hey I think something is wrong with the battle pass for me? I can't see it to my right in the main lobby. The square box to the right is empty for me in the lobby screen. I can't see the battle pass or any of the objectives I have to complete for the battle pass
Hei Gaijin, Do you have plan to change opening the Shooting Range's MBT from Strv 122 to other MBT?
I hope Merkava Mk.4M as replacement
So War Thunder has added a movie star and famous memorial at Pearl Harbor, but they gave it a crew of landlubbers. The heart on the side of the Bf 109 G-14 being referenced is most likely JG 54's green heart.
I hope in the nxt major update you add a simple animation, tires pivoting left/right for aircraft, front wheels and tail wheels.
Also, can you guys animate, that the pilot model moves his head in the direction you are looking? I mean just think where ever the our mouse view is, thats the direction the pilot moves his head! ofcourse there would be some limits on the model itself since he can't rotate the head 360*
Q: Why PBY-5 and PBY-5A landing gears up and down is different?
Two questions: 1. Are there any plans to improve realism with mud and dirt? For example, tracked vehicles throwing track when trying to pivot or neutral steer in loose dirt or mud?
2. I seem to remember the internal layout of the Bradley being accurate at one point, but they were changed, particularly with the turret, to what we have now. Was this done on purpose? If so, can you divulge the reasoning behind it?
Q: What would a good strategy to use in the T-34 85E?
A thought, you might be able to mix tanks, air, and the coastal craft in one map.
Question, why is the me 264 in the game when the mark1 model of the plane was the only one to be completely built and he did not have armor nor defense of guns, which the one in the game is the m3 that wasn’t complete why isnt the Me 262 HG-II in the game it was the Second "High Speed" variant, more heavily modified A-1a with "racing" style cockpit and wings swept at 35-degree angle and engine nacelles were moved closer to fuselage.
When are we actually getting modern french battleships instead of the WW1 ones we got ?
Q: Will we get an updated IFV triathalon?
Q: Will you add the paper tanks back? the Tiger 2H 10.5 and Panther 2 in specific? I know they aren't real, but seeing as you've added the Yak-141, and the F-16AJ, I felt I should ask.
Edit: Another question, Door Mounted Pylons were proposed for the F-16A ADF along with the F-16AJ, will we ever see that? Along with this, around the same time Japan was buying F-16s, the US was offering them along with the germans F-14s, could we possibly see this to try and expand out some air trees?
in regards to the door pylons, apparently it was going to be very difficult to actually make work
So F-111 or AV-8B next update?
Q: can you add more French proto like the mirage g and v ?
is it possible to get the SPIKE ATGM on Puma IFV ?
I can't help but think of a bobblehead or one of those Funkopop dolls every time I look at the M4/T26 Sherman.
Q: wich are the best tactics for the tornado IDS in ground rb?
Q: can you add the f111 or su24 ( more bomber )
Channel suggestion: would you mind adding more intro cameo's instead of the same Leopard for the past years already!
;-; I haven't seen any other vehicles
Congrats on 1m subs
Hello. Will there be realistic battles without planes?
Nice battleship shooting range 👍🦾
And what's the best Battlecruiser? It must be Scharnhost, almost battleship have to deal it hardly, while it need the research point same as rp of CA 6.0 (Pittsburg) in USA's naval techtree. Next video shooting ranger Gayjin should issue a guideline how to fight against it
thinking about last comment 14:12 and the following topic of
"ship vs tanks" like its pretty unfair, but the concept of combined arms operation in a single game can be done
One such suitable map are the ones found in the pacific theatre, take guadalcanal (former jungle map for tanks) or Port Moresby
taking a look in the air map of these versions, it could be suited for tank combat as well
and my idea goes by, it would be similar to naval EC matches
Ships instead of figthing over taking an enemy port, they would fight for actual naval supremacy. Air units would prove their reliability by having the option of providing CAS for tanks or striking ships to help this naval supremacy
The mode would count with a player count of 32v32 just like in custom battles that would go
15 players could be located in tanks and would have multiple objectives. Start in point A, drive to this point in dispute, once you capture it, to the next one, and the losing team would have to retreat and defend and so on. These points would have bots for the loosing team while the neutral point, cental, would just have minor decorations
while that tank battle is going on, planes are scrambled in an attempt to stop the advance of tanks, 10 planes could be the limit size since. They can strike ships, tanks and other planes
their objectives is merely for support and to gain air superiority zones
as for ships, the 7 ships remaing could fill that spot, DDs and other minor boats types could be deployed in quantity, while more heavier ships are limited. 1 battleship could be deployed at a time for example and they would fight over the naval control and could have the hability to provide naval bombardment support for tanks.
But as said, at this point the match would be one sided, there are many flaws with what i said, but in my head it looks possible
When we see the introduction of the Mitsubishi F-2, will this replace the current F-16 for Japan? Like how the Object 211 in China replaced the PT-76? As Japan never used the F-16
Hey Warthunder I have enough SL for M19A1, Jumbo, or M18 Hellcat, which should I get?
Q:will we see the f-117 nighthawk in the future??(I have asked 4 times)
Hey Gaijin, will you add the LAV25?
Are there any Bulgarian tanks or planes?
Q: Why is there no ship of the "Bismarck class"?
Because they haven’t added counters in the game except for the HMS Hood
Some of the older plane models have glitches and old cockpits. Is there any plan to update them?
Q: Will there be a naval tech tree for Sweden?
Would it be possible for a team to receive naval fire support on maps near sea shores? Depending on br and which country is calling for support or which country would have realistic control of the sea
Why does the b17 break it's wings from slight turns while some wooden frame planes can pull 13Gs in realistic?
Will the Arabic language be added in the next updates?
You guys should add the cromwell with the 95mm gun
Sad that there's not much players (including myself) I really want to play it but I always think about the sl Imma loose 😅
Q: What are the best Post-FX settings for replays? (For more realistic colouring)
Q : What guidence type that bravy use for its missile? Radar, IR, Beam Riding?
SACLOS (Semi Active Command Line Of Sight
Can we get some more canadian tech? The avro arrow would be amazing to see
Gaijin actually believes that the Arizona is worth mentioning as a top battleship over the Nevada, which has significantly higher survivability due to higher number of crew.
Q: Some of the older plane models have glitches and old cockpits. Is there any plan to update them?
Question: When will you add the Su-27 family??
Q: when will we get bombercockpits? Community is waiting for years!!
Funny how they say Duilio lack survivability because the lack of coal deposits, ignoring the fact that ship should have the Pugliese anti-torpedo systems to give extra protection to ammo racks, but in the game they were simply too lazy to add it
Q: Why does some Nations have 2 different victory and defeat theme?
Pages of history about USS ENTERPRISE pls!
can we try ships planes and tanks together as an event or something to see what happens and if we like it or not ??
Q: Is there any plan to give the F4U Corsairs drop tanks with missiles?
When can we get USS Texas
Hi Gaijin, can you guys please explain how does the IOG missiles works? Like, what is the difference between them and other SARH missiles ans stuff? Thanks
the perman is great
Q: Are you planning to add the SMS Szent István (Austro-Hungarian battleship) in the game?
The correct way would be to add the austro hunagrian TT in germany as minor nation.
Q. Will you guys ever do a swing wing triathlon ?
I have a question gaijin. When isbthe tirpitz coming to war thunder im very excited to be a Frontline brawler with him
Would it be possible to put the south-eastern city map into top tear air realistic battle circulation it would be fun flying through tunnels to evade in a dogfight
Q: do you think of adding ground troops to the game?
that metal beasts title caught me off guard
Dunkerque class when ?
Should be already here for compet a little with others 7.0 ships.
The only monster under my bed is the russian loader. The devs did a good job with the new crew voices!
Will we see a triathlon of heavy cruisers
Now all we need is Armoured trains
Q: Any plans for an ability to restock ammo at spawn points or captured points?
Why not add a tank spawn on some Naval EC maps, were A.I. ground targets spawn ? Then you could bonk the A.I. or other players in tanks. And br for planes should be different in naval modes than air rb.
The Merkavas Mk.4, Mk.3 and Mk.2D have a proximity-fused shell. You didn't use it in the video (Top MBT Thriatlon in Episode 345), for some reason. The Merkava's (From Mk.3 and above) frontal armor plate also features an internal ERA protection, making it invincible to even a hit from a DM53 120 mm APFSDS shell in the frontal armor plate. The Merkava Mk.4 is also equipped with exported DM53 shells, locally named 'Hetz-2' (Arrow-2).
I hope you will add this changes to the Merkavas (Mk.3B, Mk.3C, Mk.3D - only the HE-VT (proximity fused) shells and the internal ERA; Mk.4B, Mk.4 LIC, Mk.4M - also the Arrow-2 (DM53) shell). You nerfed the Merkavas from the very begining. That's so unfair.
You also need to add a softkill APS, add-on armor protection against ATGMs and a coaxial M2HB 12.7 mm machine gun to the Merkava Mk.4 LIC.
You also need to add LAHAT Mk.3 ATGM to the Merkavas Mk.3 B and C and Merkava Mk.2D, The LAHAT Mk.4 ATGM to Merkavas Mk.4 B and LIC, and the LAHAT Mk.5 ATGM to the Merkava Mk.4M (LAHAT ATGM is a Spike ATGM fired from a tank gun).
And if you added the Ariete AMV and the Challanger 2E, you now need to add the new Merkava Mk.4 Barak (entered the active service in the last January).
Also you need to give Python-3 to Saraph, Peten and Tzefa D/E.
Bibliographic sources: IMI, IAI, two colonels in the IDF, a senior officer in MANTAK (the Israeli administration of designing and producting tanks).
Greetings!
Yosef, an Israeli former captain in the IDF (and also a War Thunder player, for some reason)
20th time sending this comment
Day 15: Please add the Defiant in the British tech tree at battle rating 2.0-2.7 not a premium!!!
Q:What's the biggest ship in war thunder?
Q: What happens, if you hit the Ammorack of the P.108A serie 2 midair?
Q: day 2 to asking for do a triathlon to every f16 or milk truck (aa truck ) ?
Q: Why can the A21A-3 carry rockets and bombs at the same time?
Q: are you planning to add the F-15 ?
Are you going to infantry? That can bail out of Ifvs like the btr 80 with because we have tank machine guns
Will coastal fleet get updated with higher battle rating ships
Gaijin, please add vapour vorticies in the next update. Also please add the Chinese J-10(and also make a premium version).
Q: when will the a10c be added. And when is the a10 gi to be as tanky as su 25
Honestly back is easy and fun idk why people don’t play it as much even if they done grinding all the tech trees