I honestly think Only 1 percentage of humans on Earth Are Moderately Intelligent to make society a better place... MIDDLE EAST is without a doubt still living in 1500 yrs past, where they still require more slaves and Islamic Shariya laws on A Global scale.... It's Degrading to Humanity... East is The Future, They have best adaptation in their genes... Britain and Muslims looted and Divided India... Hindu majority, Developed to Today's India in 1/5th of the time they were oppressed.... Because They know that Religion is a Way of Life and not a Lens to View Objective Reality with... plus It's not mandatory to Follow anything in Hinduism it's just a Moral conduct to Treat other as yourself... or vice versa.. Japan Tanked Bombs, wars, and Is still a Significant Economy and Leading Tech. nation Meanwhile Islamic nations rank Least in almost all detrimental criteria like Unsafe, Poor Freedom of Speech or expression, Barbaric treatment of minorities and continuous persecution of Anything that's not Islamic...
No... what you see on TV are ALL things that has already happened. Yet young men whether black or white continue to do wrong on the American Streets decade after decade. 90% of Movies and TV specials are all based on Real EVENTS!!!!!
...no it didnt change anything , it was a weak attempt for Saul to imply the judge allowed it so therefore its okay. the reality is thats a contempt of court charge and mistrial
@spg1794 not really you are wrong lol .....the judge never recognized the defendent in his or her courtroom which is favoritism which allows the defendent to completely run the show and even earn compensation 😮
I mean if this whole skit is to prove that eye-witness testimony is terrible, then you should be able to argue that his eye-witness to anyone else in the store is just as terrible.
@@DerekReznik Sure,so now the opposing side has to go and find those potential eyewitnesses.....and you 've already set the precedent that they are also unreliable.
@@Frey_00there has to be a lot of people for that. In some cases, even 3/4 eye witnesses were proven to be wrong. If one person in a state of chaos, panic, danger, or fear can get details wrong, it’s possible that they all can. I’ll try and look up the case I’m think about, but there was a case we studied in school that was about 3 men all having different accounts of how things happened in the original police reports, but by the time it went to court, all 3 official eye witness testimonies done in court were nearly identical. The lawyer brought up the wildly different police reports and was able to prove that the men’s eye witness testimonies had been shifted, changed or otherwise wrong to begin with. They couldn’t prove to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty. We were never told in school whether the defendant WAS guilty. That part honestly scared me 😂
@@AlwaysBolttheBird I think there would some legal issues with the provocatory nature of how Saul did this. But if he told the judge and jury before hand it would definitely be allowed
I can't imagine it would be allowed in court. Also, in this case it happened to work. What if the defendant would've said that its not him? :D Plot armor ftw.
@@AlwaysBolttheBirdLegal Eagle did a video on this scene and yes it’s not acceptable. I don’t recall the full details but I think it’s because they would have had to have the “false defendant” sworn in and that’s against the rules/law or something.
in a real court you could get in trouble doing it this way, but if you tell the judge and then have the defendent not at your side and just in the courtroom you can do that
@@BessuxSo... The witness incorrectly identified the criminal after saying he could absolutely identify the criminal. And that's a flaw with Goodman's ethics and not with the witness? Really guy? Okay then.
@@RafaelKeveluk Sim, "my guy". The criminal Jimmy is actually helping, in case you forgot, so here's your reminder, so make sure whatever's left in between your ears memorizes it this time.
But doesn't "you didn't recognize him either" weaken his case? Saul literally just admitted that he found someone that looked similar enough to fool most people that briefly met the guy. That means that his defendant is wery likely the guy, isn't it?
It wasn't clever. Defense attorney's have been using that one for decades, and failing with it for just as long. You can always find someone you can make look enough like a given person to fool everyone from 20 feet away. When they pull stunts like that, it just tells you they are trying to distract a jury from the mountain of physical evidence against a client.
@guruwu1566 Actually it hasn't as a number of lawyers have commented on this over the years. There isn't a case ever where this was done as it's technically fraud and could have the counsel disbarred. Used for decades? Get the fuck outta here. Link one case in the US where it's been done. Don't bother responding till then.
@@basementnetwork By bringing the man to the counsels table (which should not be made accessible to anyone but the defendant and counsel (defendant attorney)) he has already allowed for the misrepresentation of the defendant's identity which is illegal, unethical, and would not be allowed in ANY court in the united states. Get back with me once you pass your Bar(rrrrs) exam.
@@exhanfxancis9808 I doubt a lawyer would expect a judge (or anyone for that matter), to recognize someone they've never seen before. What's up with you clowns and pointing out the obvious? 😂
There was actually a real life example of this happening where the lawyer and the client actually switched outfits and changed places. It saved the man from false accusations that a woman and her lawyer were making against him just for a payday.
@@TheRata1998I'm pretty sure you're allowed to defend yourself in court, so no, it wouldn't be illegal I don't think. You're just not allowed to present yourself as a lawyer for someone else
that's a fact. but before doing that you are asked by the judge how you want to be represented, if you state that you will have a lawyer then you can't represent yourself.
@@TheRata1998 They did it right in front of the judge before the woman and her lawyer walked in, so the judge was aware of what they were doing and allowed it.
In this scenario the guy was tricked. He had already seen the defendant and had no way of knowing that the defendant was switched. They intentionally made the decoy look like the defendant
This is real, heard stories where expensive lawyers who work at firms recommending lawyers like saul but irl because they know the judge will spite them plus lawyers like saul but irl deal way more with robbery/possesion cases. im trying to find this clip of a guy talking about it,
So was James Spader (aka Raymond Reddington) and not just once either. 10 seasons, that show (The Blacklist) went, and every single season, James Spader delivered the best performance in all of TV. That’s 10 counts of Highway Robbery that whoever votes on that shit is guilty of.
@@jacobdetamore7399Meanwhile Gen alpha "Your honor my client couldn't have done it as the time of the crime they/them were busy watching skibidi toilet and rizzing up their AI girlfriend with a lvl 5 gyatt"
@@HALLish-jl5mothats what happens in the gap between the shows though. He wasnt around to keep them out when he needed to go into hiding (more cred) so they probably missed him
@@HALLish-jl5mo your standard for what qualifies as a great lawyer is not realistic, therefore your initial question is nonsense. It simply isn't possible to keep every+ defendant out of prison because
Cause im mr sakey, yes im the real sakey, all you other real sakeys are just hollis earley. so wont the real sakey please stand up, please stand up, please stand up
The entire point is that if he's able to find a lookalike so easily at some random bar, what's to say the witness isn't recalling their face accurately. I don't think this was to try and humiliate the store owner but rather discredit eye witness testimony
And still the wrong guy. This really is a good example of why eyewitness testimony is often very flawed. There is no proof that fingerprints are unique either.
@@h.a.l.3980it should. If an eyewitness can be deceived by someone who looks mildly like the person, they didn’t have a good enough accounting of the incident. I’m pro-adding this to the tool box.
The writer who came up with this scene is pure genius Edit- in the comments someone posted the real case it was based on. The lawyer got in trouble and was fined but it was only 100$ lol
@@bryansummers3219 Saul chose someone who looked exactly like the defendant so the witness wouldn't notice. Even if he had memorized the guy's face it would still have been hard to tell.
It doesn't matter the record already recognized the man in the defended sheet as the person of the name they were looking for you can't rename the defendant sitting in the finished chair if you already recognize them as such he's already been recognized as the defendant there is no other defendant with the fed in a record sitting in the chair for the defendant of record get the fuck out of here
@@itz--microchipif you mean why he had someone else instead, im thinking it’s to prove he’s really not at fault and the guy accusing is just pinning it on the defendant
"Bait and switch" generally refers to when one person offers something alluring or desirable as part of a deal or transaction and then, after receiving payment or compensation for that certain something, giving the other person something other than what was originally promised ❤
Charles McGill was jealous as f*ck. His brother was a better attorney without all the accolades and fluff. I want who can get me out of a jam when it’s warranted.
This is wild "Dec. 20, 2017 - The substitution of a defendant with someone who looks similar for witness identification in a trial was a successful tactic for a defense lawyer - but not without consequences for the lawyer."
U realize he was found in contempt and had to serve 30 days for making the judge look stupid.. that's how the justice system is.. and it was completely dismissed and swept under the rug
In movies maybe but in real life they pull this all the time. They say the most dramatic things possible every sentence to the point where it means nothing anymore
Vince Gilligan craftsmanship and intelligence. His works are will age like a fine wine. The depth of each character and very soul of English America in every aspect.
This is why Saul Goodman is one of the best characters to grace a television screen. Smart, vivid imagination and as incorrigible as the people he defends.
@matthewkreps3352 yes, but moreso just to avoid the contempt charges and smooth the process over, no? I can't see any honest reason that this wouldn't be legal. It just makes the point that suspicion and circumstance don't equate guilt.
No, all of it is clear to showcase he is innocent, the alleged case should be struck from any background checks, however, as to not hurt any future chances on employment
Had Goodman adviced the judge, they might actually have entertained this kind of thing. But by not informing the court beforehand, it would be a mistrial and Goodman would have been in for a disciplinary hearing.
@@rebelsrequiem3763 lol ofc they didn't duh. It's just the way the sentence was phrased gave a CoD player vibe. You're clearly not about fun & games so you wouldn't get it
@izzydanWTF imma be real. COD was never a part of my childhood fully. That goes to Resident Evil. But that's like seeing someone talking about zombies and going, "Oh my god, Resident Evil fan spotted!!".
@rebelsrequiem3763 person likes zombies... someone makes resident evil reference... makes sense to me. People make references. It's a pretty common thing lol.
This actually happened with Jim Morrison and actor Tom Baker. Jim did some antics on a plane and when he went to trial shaved and had his hair looking like Baker. Stewardess couldn’t tell them apart. All charges dropped.
@@mattandersen2786 probably not. the extra person isn't going to testify and didn't witness anything. and yes. this tactic is 100% valid but you need to tell the judge beforehand.
@@user-jz7vf5iq7h I think anyone participating in the court proceedings would need to be on the witness list and the guy basically took the place of the defendant for that part of the trial. Saul says the bartender from Belen has "a very good alibi" so at the very least Saul is going to have a witness statement and probably some other evidence that can be submitted as an exhibit in order to verify that alibi if they're asked to do so.
@@mattandersen2786 he was just mocking the fact that the man he had pointed couldn't be the culprit because he had "a very good alibi" other than looking like the suspect, he isn't related to the case in any way so it would make no sense for him to make any statement.
@@user-jz7vf5iq7h You're very obviously talking about something you know very little about. If you knew anything about trial/court procedure, you would know that anyone participating in the court proceedings didn't just show up randomly one day. It all needs to be documented through witness lists, witness statements and exhibits. Hell, even Huell had to be on the witness list so he could bump into Chuck in the hallway and plant Jimmy's cell phone on him.
It proved that anyone that looked like his client could have done it actually...... Specially when the only witness said I don't need time that's him and pointed at the wrong guy..... Created reasonable doubt.... Case done.
Nope. It cast reasonable doubt on the eyewitness testimony. And to be blunt, a preponderance of evidence should not be solely reliant on eyewitness testimony as it is very unreliable. It exists mainly for two reasons. One is to help the defense/prosecution find leads to build up a case or to build up a defense with which they can then find empirical evidence to support. Ideally empirical evidence would lead to possible credibility of eyewitness testimony, and this could be used to sway the judge/jury. The other reason is if there is not empirical evidence it can still have a small chance of swaying the judge or the jury if another witness corroborates the story, or if the sole witness is convincing enough or has enough details to be convincing enough to sound credible. Either way, it does not mean the eyewitness testimony is reliable.
@@HovaSwervedon’t expect too much lawyer stuff but BCS is hands down the greatest show to be made. Way better than BB You have any lawyer shows/movies that you’d recommend?
@@HovaSwervethe show is called "better call Saul" And you knew about it and it's name, yet you never figured out it's about Saul? Excuse me what the fuck?
@@isaacgeier6158 no. Jimmy broke protocol doing this, and a mistrial must be declared. You can't then use things that happened in a previous trial to make your argument in a new one. So no, he ain't getting acquitted based on THIS.
@@Qwerty12345-r I had asked a lawyer what they do in this instance. They said they could have their client sit with other people in the gallery. Then they could ask the judge permission to see if they could ask the witness to point them out among the people.
@@gvc76False. He can't tell the difference between 2 people which means there's doubt which means not guilty. That's why the police say in a line up it's better to say you don't know and not sure then pick the wrong person. Because picking the wrong person will ruin the ENTIRE case.
At best it’s a mistrial. A waste of everyone’s time and the prosecutor files again, thus why everyone is annoyed. Jurors all wasted their time there and a new jury would be selected. So yeah, they are all angry. Where the show gets it wrong: worst case the lawyer is punished by the bar for intentionally violating court rules and deceiving the court and is suspended.
"You didn't recognize him either your honor."
How art imitates life.
Yea, because that's the line that opens Saul and his otherwise innocent partner up to a contempt charge.
I honestly think Only 1 percentage of humans on Earth Are Moderately Intelligent to make society a better place...
MIDDLE EAST is without a doubt still living in 1500 yrs past, where they still require more slaves and Islamic Shariya laws on A Global scale....
It's Degrading to Humanity...
East is The Future, They have best adaptation in their genes...
Britain and Muslims looted and Divided India...
Hindu majority, Developed to Today's India in 1/5th of the time they were oppressed....
Because They know that Religion is a Way of Life and not a Lens to View Objective Reality with... plus It's not mandatory to Follow anything in Hinduism it's just a Moral conduct to Treat other as yourself... or vice versa..
Japan Tanked Bombs, wars, and Is still a Significant Economy and Leading Tech. nation
Meanwhile Islamic nations rank Least in almost all detrimental criteria like Unsafe, Poor Freedom of Speech or expression, Barbaric treatment of minorities and continuous persecution of Anything that's not Islamic...
No... what you see on TV are ALL things that has already happened. Yet young men whether black or white continue to do wrong on the American Streets decade after decade. 90% of Movies and TV specials are all based on Real EVENTS!!!!!
😂😂😂😂
Art as imitation
-Can you recognize the robber?
-Yeah, he's there at the back of the courtroom.
-Fuck.
That will be hilarious😂
😅😅😅😅😅
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Hhhhhh
"You didn't recognize him either, your honour!" game changing statement!!😂😂😂
Sooo true😂
Contempt-earning statement
...no it didnt change anything , it was a weak attempt for Saul to imply the judge allowed it so therefore its okay. the reality is thats a contempt of court charge and mistrial
@spg1794 not really you are wrong lol .....the judge never recognized the defendent in his or her courtroom which is favoritism which allows the defendent to completely run the show and even earn compensation 😮
@@spg1794 this happened in real life with almost the same transcript, it changed everything kid XD
"..and there was no one else in the store?" Seals off the possibility of any additional witnesses. Pretty smart
I mean if this whole skit is to prove that eye-witness testimony is terrible, then you should be able to argue that his eye-witness to anyone else in the store is just as terrible.
well it's a script, so you're saying kudos to the writers for being smart?
@@Alex_1729"well actually its a tv show 🤪" ass comment
@@DerekReznik Sure,so now the opposing side has to go and find those potential eyewitnesses.....and you 've already set the precedent that they are also unreliable.
@@Alex_1729 yes the writers have to be smart to write a smart character
That was super slick and on top of that he 100% pointed out how easily people can send somebody to jail and be incorrect
Fact 💯 😂
I'm real life Court a single eye witness testimony means nothing though. Physical evidence or multiple witnesses is more sufficient.
@kingfuqurmahmen6792 statistics would disagree with you. You spend too much time on social media.
@kingfuqurmahmen6792how can you be so willfully ignorant? Its VERY hard to prove ra**. And your claim only helps rapists, you know that right?
@@mef12727I mean it shouldn't, but it often does.
Bro actually used "Your honor, stfu you wasn't even there" in court
😂nice
“ Your honor, my client claims Nuh uh. You wasn even there”
@@mitchwranich2236anytime someone blames you for something and go to court, just say "your honor, Nuh uh" 😂
actually its worse because he was in court for a couple days notably a few hours each day and even so she didnt realize it wasnt the defendant
🤣🤣🤣🤣
That's why eyewitness testimony is the weakest form of evidence
Neil Degrasse Tyson agrees with you
But people still go to prison for it even if it is 💀
Unless it’s testified by multiple accounts. But a single eyewitness and it’s the plaintiff himself would be doubtful.
@@Frey_00there has to be a lot of people for that. In some cases, even 3/4 eye witnesses were proven to be wrong. If one person in a state of chaos, panic, danger, or fear can get details wrong, it’s possible that they all can. I’ll try and look up the case I’m think about, but there was a case we studied in school that was about 3 men all having different accounts of how things happened in the original police reports, but by the time it went to court, all 3 official eye witness testimonies done in court were nearly identical. The lawyer brought up the wildly different police reports and was able to prove that the men’s eye witness testimonies had been shifted, changed or otherwise wrong to begin with. They couldn’t prove to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty. We were never told in school whether the defendant WAS guilty. That part honestly scared me 😂
Also got to take into account coaching taken by investigators. @@Frey_00
He's not breaking any rules. He's just proving the court his point.
Is there really no rule against swapping a defendant? I figured there would be
@@AlwaysBolttheBird I think there would some legal issues with the provocatory nature of how Saul did this. But if he told the judge and jury before hand it would definitely be allowed
I can't imagine it would be allowed in court.
Also, in this case it happened to work. What if the defendant would've said that its not him? :D Plot armor ftw.
I’m pretty sure only the defendant and his council can be at the table. It wasn’t a valid defense. The point was to provoke a mistrial
@@AlwaysBolttheBirdLegal Eagle did a video on this scene and yes it’s not acceptable. I don’t recall the full details but I think it’s because they would have had to have the “false defendant” sworn in and that’s against the rules/law or something.
"You don't need a criminal lawyer, you need a *CRIMINAL* lawyer."
One has to read this twice to understand 😂🔥
Top tier Jessie quote
Facts
I see what u did there...but facts tho...
Jesse
The perfect analogy of: "He's out of line, but he's right."
in a real court you could get in trouble doing it this way, but if you tell the judge and then have the defendent not at your side and just in the courtroom you can do that
@@bigbananadealer846disbarred before the day was over and probably face some form of criminal charge ranging from contempt to tampering
Not an analogy
And for the old guy: He’s in line but he’s wrong
He chose someone who looked near identical 💀
"If a lawyer ask u the same question more than once you already lost"
“Objection! She’s clearly building to something.”
"Does that glove fit you, Mr. Simpson?"
This is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
That’s you playing right into their hands three times in a quick row.
@@vancearama "Over ruled, the court needs to hear what it is"
Not at all
"You have to play our silly game Mr. Goodman. Catching people in their lies is against the rules!"
That's exceptionally clever 😅😅😅😅😅😅
Except that, you know, he's the one lying.
But I guess acknowledging Jimmy is unethical goes against the narrative you're trying to peddle.
@@BessuxSo... The witness incorrectly identified the criminal after saying he could absolutely identify the criminal. And that's a flaw with Goodman's ethics and not with the witness? Really guy? Okay then.
@@RafaelKeveluk Sim, "my guy". The criminal Jimmy is actually helping, in case you forgot, so here's your reminder, so make sure whatever's left in between your ears memorizes it this time.
@@BessuxHe's not "helping a criminal" you absolute brainlet. Undermining the opposing case is his job.
The genius behind the character is amazing
1.4k likes and no comments? Let me fix that!
VG
This is actually common. Maybe not in the court room, but definitely during cross-examination and depositions.
@@CAGonRivthe defendant would not be present for the deposition of the plaintiff. I can kinda sorta see where you are going with this though lol
A show with genius writing, great characters, amazing acting, and extraordinary directing.
A good lawyer never asks a question they don't already know the answer to.
Not true. I’ve been to court. Lawyers totally ask questions to get answers they didn’t already have.
He said Good Lawyer 😊😊😊
@@lorenzopearson110 It's a quote from a movie
@@jelly.212 Ahhh ok. Thank you. It's movie logic. makes sense.
@@lorenzopearson110emphasis on “good”
That last little dig “you didn’t recognize him either your honor” 🤣
that would add an extra month at least for the contempt of court that he would get from a real judge :D
@@andrewsmithty shit a real judge might be too embarrassed to give contempt after that 🤣🤣
@@andrewsmithtywould they?
Love it!!!!
But doesn't "you didn't recognize him either" weaken his case?
Saul literally just admitted that he found someone that looked similar enough to fool most people that briefly met the guy. That means that his defendant is wery likely the guy, isn't it?
Kevin Costner is such a clever lawyer
LOL. He does look like him.
and it worked because he believed it
Yes
@@StarmaGeddonI liked that they actually turned the line into a scene in BCS 😂
You don’t need a criminal lawyer, you need a “criminal” lawyer.
No, you'd want a real lawyer, real life isn't like a TV show my guy haha
@@QuantumFeldspar 🙄 he's quoting Breaking Bad... 😂😂😂😂😂
@@ElleD308 thanks for letting me know twice, pal
@ElleD308 plus Jesse says "wants" not "needs", so he's wrong anyway
@@QuantumFeldspar awww you had to search it? 😂 that's cute
The judge was like a teacher scolding the smartest kid in the room who just pulled a clever prank
Happened to me once in junior high school. Really wounded my self confidence. My teacher apologised later behind closed doors.
Judges have approved things like this in the past, as long as you tell them ahead of time.
It wasn't clever. Defense attorney's have been using that one for decades, and failing with it for just as long. You can always find someone you can make look enough like a given person to fool everyone from 20 feet away. When they pull stunts like that, it just tells you they are trying to distract a jury from the mountain of physical evidence against a client.
@@1retiredknight it was clever, thats why its been used for decades, stop contradicting yourself for the sake of being a contrarian👌🏼
@guruwu1566 Actually it hasn't as a number of lawyers have commented on this over the years. There isn't a case ever where this was done as it's technically fraud and could have the counsel disbarred. Used for decades? Get the fuck outta here. Link one case in the US where it's been done. Don't bother responding till then.
"You didn't recognize him either your honor"barrrrs😂💪🏾💪🏾
As he gets thrown in jail for misrepresentation and contempt of court... Barrrrs 😂
@@unbasedcontrarianbut he won for his client. Barssssssss 🍸
@@ttp513 Not in a real court lol. Barrrrs 🧼
@@unbasedcontrarian "misrepresentation"????
Goodman made no claims as to the identity of the man at his table.
@@basementnetwork By bringing the man to the counsels table (which should not be made accessible to anyone but the defendant and counsel (defendant attorney)) he has already allowed for the misrepresentation of the defendant's identity which is illegal, unethical, and would not be allowed in ANY court in the united states. Get back with me once you pass your Bar(rrrrs) exam.
“Oh Mr. Goodman! Really?!!” 😂
"Your honor, I'm gonna do a Better Call Saul on this one."
Will the real slim shady please stand up?
Who is soul goodman. I thought he was just a character from breaking bad but this does not seem from breaking bad
@@indianheartbeat9005 it's from Better Call Saul. It's a spin-off about Saul Goodman before the time of Breaking Bad
"Your honor, I'm terribly sorry but I'm about to Saul Goodman over this case" - Martin Luther King, probably
Your honor imma be slippin jimmy for this case
“your honor stfu you weren't even there"
🤣🤣🤣🤣on God , who TF said you can pick a side H03
This sent me 💀💀💀
😂😂😂
Fr
💀💀💀 Underrated Comment
"Your honor, how could my client possibly be lying if his pants aren't on fire?"
Good one
Lol nice
Liar, liar plants for hire.
"Your honor shut up you wasn't even there!"
“Your honor, it’s just me in the room…..going keep fighting?”
Saul was an incredibly clever lawyer
Hes a world class lawyer, kinda scary how good he is 😬
You don't want a criminal lawyer... you want a "criminal" lawyer.
- Jesse Pinkman
One of the best things Jesse said
@@ivaranaldi2160the way he said it can’t be replicated 😂
His slippping Jimmy
'It's All Good Man'
I want Alan Shore.
"You didn't recognize him either your honour" 😂😂😂
Nice copying
She shouldn’t be able to recognise him anyway unless they have had previous court sittings
That was the best part😅😅😅😅
@@ArpanDe is a line from literally the same clip you've just watched genius.
@@exhanfxancis9808 I doubt a lawyer would expect a judge (or anyone for that matter), to recognize someone they've never seen before. What's up with you clowns and pointing out the obvious? 😂
🤣 "YOU DIDN'T RECOGNIZE HIM EITHER YOUR HONOR"
There was actually a real life example of this happening where the lawyer and the client actually switched outfits and changed places. It saved the man from false accusations that a woman and her lawyer were making against him just for a payday.
This would be illegal due to the fact that the client is practicing law in a courtroom without proper license. Js
@@TheRata1998I'm pretty sure you're allowed to defend yourself in court, so no, it wouldn't be illegal I don't think. You're just not allowed to present yourself as a lawyer for someone else
@@13ciaran13000
I’d like to see some self-representation in a kangaroo court myself.
that's a fact. but before doing that you are asked by the judge how you want to be represented, if you state that you will have a lawyer then you can't represent yourself.
@@TheRata1998 They did it right in front of the judge before the woman and her lawyer walked in, so the judge was aware of what they were doing and allowed it.
The way the judge say "ohhhh, Mr GOODMAN" like your mother when you say something inappropriate at the dinner table.
He actually did. Now pass the peas.😆
Because you know he pulls something like this at least once a week. 😂
🤣
I think your're
projecting quite a bit.
@@silentlineac yroou're*
Even the judge was annoyed that the witness had no clue who robbed him.
No the judge was annoyed that the lawyer was disrespecting the court room.
In real life the judge probably would have locked up Saul for a few days.
@@CrimOudinshe was annoyed that he was actually trying to fight for the truth rather than just keeping to standard protocol
@@mark9294 That's not necessarily what defense attorneys do. Saul probably knew his defendant was guilty, but has to try and get him off anyways.
@@mark9294 You know he could've asked the judge to this beforehand to test the guy's testimony... But he didn't, that's why the judge is mad.
“It’s not him”
Judge - “This case has concluded here, you are free to leave”
Wowwwww😮😮😮😮😮when did this ever happened!?
"Your honor, shut the fuck up, you weren't even there"
you forgot "your honor, disrespectfully"
Copy and paste comment
@@silvy7394 yeah but he said it better 🗿
Exactly
“Do you promise to tell the truth, only the truth, and nothing but the truth?” “Shit I guess.”
Old man: it's him that one in the back right there.
Saul: 💀
lmao
Ummm what? That's not what happened...
@@mattjack3983no shit that’s the joke
@@mattjack3983no shit we know that but the comment is saying imagine if the old guy wasnt dumb
@@motivatedman9730old dude not even dumb bro looks just like him
Saul basically just said “your honor stfu because you werent even there” but in a nicer way
All court cases all around the world, all of them in a nutshell
😂😅 true
😂
In this scenario the guy was tricked. He had already seen the defendant and had no way of knowing that the defendant was switched. They intentionally made the decoy look like the defendant
No he called your honor blind cus she didn't no his client wasn't his Client lol
Bro looked like they were twins
yeah that whats makes me question if this even allowed 😅
That's the point. An innocent look-alike person can go to jail for no reason because eyewitness doesn't recognize the real criminal
Every person going to court wants a Saul Goodman on their side
You real don't want to end up with a mistrial because your lawyer did something this stupid
That's who Tay k need to hire 😂
In any real life situation you wouldn’t want this mess anywhere near your case😂😂
This is real, heard stories where expensive lawyers who work at firms recommending lawyers like saul but irl because they know the judge will spite them plus lawyers like saul but irl deal way more with robbery/possesion cases. im trying to find this clip of a guy talking about it,
A lawyer tried this little trick years ago. It didn't hold up and the judge was not amused
The real crime is that Saul Goodman was robbed of his Emmy’s!!!
At this point, its obvious the emmy's isnt for the talented. Its for the most influential and connections
Ozark was just better
So was James Spader (aka Raymond Reddington) and not just once either. 10 seasons, that show (The Blacklist) went, and every single season, James Spader delivered the best performance in all of TV. That’s 10 counts of Highway Robbery that whoever votes on that shit is guilty of.
@@RIPAR15nah
@@RIPAR15good joke lmao Ozark has some of the worst writing of any show I've ever seen
"Objection, your honor, he's obviously setting up a big reveal"
Nah bruh thats funny asf, I actually like that more for the Gen Z as lawyers memes than the “you werent even there” or “thats cap your honor”
@@jacobdetamore7399Meanwhile Gen alpha "Your honor my client couldn't have done it as the time of the crime they/them were busy watching skibidi toilet and rizzing up their AI girlfriend with a lvl 5 gyatt"
@@regularperson9297 Hold up bro wtf thats an actual link 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
What link @@jacobdetamore7399
Jimmy was scary smart. I love how loyal Kim was to him.
You have the coolest name I've ever seen on YT 😅👍🏼✨️
@@adrukova1407 Why thank you! You sir, are a scholar and a gentleman.
Shame huel ate her
Seriously, GREAT show but Kim’s ride or die loyalty was the best part…and she is absolutely beautiful
🎉
this is the reason the inmates were chanting his name in the prison bus.
the guy was a living legend among them
Tadaaaa 😮😮😮😮😮
a real Crowd Pleaser
I don't understand that.
If Saul was so good, his clients WOULDN'T BE IN PRISON.
@@HALLish-jl5mothats what happens in the gap between the shows though. He wasnt around to keep them out when he needed to go into hiding (more cred) so they probably missed him
@@HALLish-jl5mo your standard for what qualifies as a great lawyer is not realistic, therefore your initial question is nonsense. It simply isn't possible to keep every+ defendant out of prison because
The lawyer really said "will the real Mr. Sakey please stand up"
all the other Mr. Sakeys are just imitating
best comment
@@FacundoColombier thank you 😊
Stand sit roll over 😅😅😅😅it's a clown 🤡 show 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Cause im mr sakey, yes im the real sakey, all you other real sakeys are just hollis earley. so wont the real sakey please stand up, please stand up, please stand up
Plot twist: The bartender was the robber.
LOL!!
Fr 😂
😂
Plot twist part 2; the bartender is a an identical twin to two other male siblings. They are triplets😂😂😂
😂
Bro, the defendant looked just like like the fake defendant
Edit: thx so much for 582 likes I’ve never had that much
Exactly
that was the point
The entire point is that if he's able to find a lookalike so easily at some random bar, what's to say the witness isn't recalling their face accurately. I don't think this was to try and humiliate the store owner but rather discredit eye witness testimony
That's what we call a reasonable doubt.
And still the wrong guy. This really is a good example of why eyewitness testimony is often very flawed. There is no proof that fingerprints are unique either.
All a lawyer has to do is create a reasonable doubt. Saul understood the assignment.
My lawyer told me the best lawyers all have something in common, creative imagination and a silver tongue to word it out.
This would never fly in the real world.
@@h.a.l.3980it should. If an eyewitness can be deceived by someone who looks mildly like the person, they didn’t have a good enough accounting of the incident. I’m pro-adding this to the tool box.
so a lawyer could really put someone other than the defendant in that seat?
@@h.a.l.3980 No, but it has actually happened in the real world.
The writer who came up with this scene is pure genius
Edit- in the comments someone posted the real case it was based on. The lawyer got in trouble and was fined but it was only 100$ lol
I've seen this same scene in multiple shows.
It's weak. It would have been more convincing if the guy at the table looked less like the defendant. He could have been his twin!
Chill
@@bryansummers3219 Saul chose someone who looked exactly like the defendant so the witness wouldn't notice. Even if he had memorized the guy's face it would still have been hard to tell.
@@jim.h don’t mean shit if you don’t name them 🤷♂️
The real robber is the friends we made along the way
That is actually true😂
Thanks for that reference 😂
Genshin?
ONE PIECE!😂😂😂😂
😂
Obviously this is my sign to finally watch this series from beginning to end 😅
The judge saying "oh Mr. Goodman" kinda sound like she's seen a lot of this clever tricks very often from Mr. Goodman
NO!!!!??
She has 😅
its the whole point of the show its called better call saul he’s a kniving lawyer
And been just as adrimingly exasperated each time... Jimmy is such a rascal that people love him anyways
@@nbacamhconniving..
“You didn’t recognize him either, your honor.” Best line in the video.
Edit: I never got so many likes! Thank you!
It doesn't matter the record already recognized the man in the defended sheet as the person of the name they were looking for you can't rename the defendant sitting in the finished chair if you already recognize them as such he's already been recognized as the defendant there is no other defendant with the fed in a record sitting in the chair for the defendant of record get the fuck out of here
I can’t understand the reasoning behind this what happened here?(with explanation)
@@itz--microchipthe 49ers defense failed to stop the chiefs game winning drive
Best line in the series.
@@itz--microchipif you mean why he had someone else instead, im thinking it’s to prove he’s really not at fault and the guy accusing is just pinning it on the defendant
"I don't need time, that's him!" Favorite line 😂😂😂😂
That’s why eyewitness accounts are so unreliable even by train people FBI agents they’ve done tests, and they fail miserably
Disney is the real life Vought
You didn’t recognize him either judge
Your honor*
@koltenglasgow8015 almost like someone referring to you by your name or "bitch" could mean the same thing and have different social implications 🤦♂️
oh Mr Good man
And that’s how you lose a case
@@Doges_World yes but one is proper procedure to address a judge
"Your honor, you weren't even there" aaahh vibe 😭😭😭😭
Fr bro ✋😭
goodman just said "NU UH"
"You didn't recognise him either your Honor"
He said that yes
Judge should then reply with only two words. Case dismissed.
Classic!!!
Doesn't that defeat the purpose of the trick tho?
@@cris5244that’s what I always thought
When a criminal become a criminal lawyer 😂😂😂
The ol "bait and switch" 😂😂
Facts 😂😂😂
"Bait and switch" generally refers to when one person offers something alluring or desirable as part of a deal or transaction and then, after receiving payment or compensation for that certain something, giving the other person something other than what was originally promised
❤
Exactly what happened in the video @@merrickbrody8859
Hes a master baiter
@@merrickbrody8859which is basically what he did
This is legal but you sure to ask the judge first
He didn't want to run the risk of the judge forbidding it!
its safer to ask forgiveness than to ask permission
I don't know if that's true when it comes to law. That's how cases get thrown out😂@@mclovin2408
@@mclovin2408so you’ll steal a bike from a bike owner then ask for forgiveness rather than getting permission from them?
@@mclovin2408Not when you are a professional in the court of law. You would be disbarred no matter how much you beg.
"You didn't recognize him either your honor" 😂😂😂
"Objection. My honor!!" - the judge right after the scene probably 😂😂😂
@@abhishekp2950 She was confused 😂
Like yeah. Yeah she did
@@Sailorbydaylike no she didn't..
😂
"Slim shady would you please stand up?"'🤣
“Jimmy with a law degree is like a Chimp with a machine gun”
Charles McGill
😂😂
I would hire him
Charles McGill was jealous as f*ck. His brother was a better attorney without all the accolades and fluff. I want who can get me out of a jam when it’s warranted.
CHICANERY!
@@3MUnique I loved Goodman but damn homeboy knew how to cut corners 😂 Charles' jealous was perhaps that he is too principled
Judge was like, Bru I'm trying to ruin someone's life here!
Ultimate statement 😂😂😂
Best comment! 😂
Notice how there is a jury, so it isn't the judge finding guilt or innocence.
He ruined it himself
hahahahaaaaaa
lol they are twisted tho fr
"You didn't recognize him either, your honor." SMH, EPIC!!
This is wild "Dec. 20, 2017 - The substitution of a defendant with someone who looks similar for witness identification in a trial was a successful tactic for a defense lawyer - but not without consequences for the lawyer."
Curious what’re the consequences ?
@@Steven_Herrmannwhat are the consequences?
In Michigan being held in contempt of court is a fine of no more than 7,500 or jail of no more than 93 days
U realize he was found in contempt and had to serve 30 days for making the judge look stupid.. that's how the justice system is.. and it was completely dismissed and swept under the rug
"Shut up, Your Honour - you weren't even there."
When a lawyer asks you " Are you Sure ? ", You're fucked ! 😂
Or they're tryna get in your head, but probably the former
A law TH-camr once said a good lawyer never asks you a question they don’t already know the answer to :-p
@@jessicacolgrave4082 That was in TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD decades ago.
In movies maybe but in real life they pull this all the time. They say the most dramatic things possible every sentence to the point where it means nothing anymore
Heavenly father I pray for everyone who find this comment may God continue to bless you and your family ❤️🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
"yes it's him" proceeds to point at a woman
That's Saul's wife Kim Wexler. They just panned the camera to her. This video is edited in such a manner
He pointed at the guy with the beard next to the défense attorney, it’s just that the camera keeps panning to the woman
@@arrow5529yeah I needed to word it better that the recorder points at the woman
Don’t assume a gender for the person pointed at 😂 the person chose to be “HIM” not “HER” 😂
@@DestinyKenny yeah and grew a penis to back it up
The way he set it up for reasonable doubt 🔥🔥🔥
wrong it was unlawful in a Canadian Court
@@seadoggydog1well this would be new mexico… which last I checked was not Canada so. Who cares
@@seadoggydog1nobody gives a shit about Canada or their court system
@@seadoggydog1 this is America mf
@@seadoggydog1what even IS Canada?
Vince Gilligan craftsmanship and intelligence.
His works are will age like a fine wine. The depth of each character and very soul of English America in every aspect.
Wtf
:D
Yeah, except that has been done before numerous times.
Even the Bartender looked back like WTF is he talking about 🤣🤣🤣 Saul is the best lawyer ever
🤣🤣🤣
He obviously knew what he was talking about if he agreed to the gig? Are you 12 ?
@@prokeyavaimausa9412CONGRATULATIONS! YOU FOUND THE FUNNY! AMAZING! WOW! THAT'S WHY THEY FOUND IT FUNNY!🎉
It was obviously a joke. You have to be an actual child lol, or just dull.@prokeyavaimausa9412
TH-cam mary and jesus in the quran and mohmmad in the bible and the scientific miracles of the quran
This is why Saul Goodman is one of the best characters to grace a television screen. Smart, vivid imagination and as incorrigible as the people he defends.
Matlock was pretty good too!
@@longbow6416Yes Sir 👍!!!
I need to start watching this.
Series name?
@@pradeepmalar327better call saul
Imagine he’s like “yea” and then points to the actual defendant in the crowd 🤣🤣🤣
Well then, that means he really did recognize him. It would be bad for Jimmy and his client, but good for the legal system.
Goodbye next season😂
Imagine he pointed on lawyer or the judge
Nightmare 😂
Lol 😂
"I don't need time that's him" 😂😂😂
Knowing how corrupt the system can be, I see this as an absolute win.
293 likes and no comments let me fix that
Win lose bad guys get away or is it that people lie and will take anyone to court so the good guy gets away
People dont want to understand that this world is runned by rulers of the darkness @@zacrodriguez3057
Where is the system not "corrupt"
Untill the guilty party gets let go and does it again
As hilarious as this is, it’s a good way to piss off a judge for the rest of your career.
That sounds like the judges problem.
Too bad you can't take it personal
Personal animus is basis to disqualify the judge.
Don't hate the player, hate the game. His job is defend his client. Her job is to be impartial.
Uh, it's a good way for a judge to Wake the Hell UP
That's honestly the kind of lawyer you'd want. 😂
Cause hes Saul goodman
If your into meth then, yeah, I guess
@@Averagetendy keep talking.....
@@ashton-eg5qlI.e. his actions were not allowed. In otherwords, if you like breaking rules, similar to possessing meth.
No not really
“You don’t need a criminal lawyer, you need a CRIMINAL lawyer”
-someone somewhere
"You didn't recognise him either, your honor."
The balls on this man
Edit: I KNOW IT IS FROM A MOVIE
Lawyers are allowed to do this. But they are supposed to get permission from the judge first I am told.
@matthewkreps3352 yes, but moreso just to avoid the contempt charges and smooth the process over, no?
I can't see any honest reason that this wouldn't be legal. It just makes the point that suspicion and circumstance don't equate guilt.
It was a show. Spin off from breaking bad
@@BigCore- And shows that play in our world are usually better when they are realistic.
yea but They look fucking identical😂😂😂😂 so theres really no point in this scene
The witness should be kicked out of court, testimony struck from the court records and the court case dropped.
No, all of it is clear to showcase he is innocent, the alleged case should be struck from any background checks, however, as to not hurt any future chances on employment
Had Goodman adviced the judge, they might actually have entertained this kind of thing. But by not informing the court beforehand, it would be a mistrial and Goodman would have been in for a disciplinary hearing.
@@Palpinator225 the Witness is a lying sack of crap. Anyone who lies in court needs to be punished.
Y i. U
u got copied lmao
The delivery on "Oh, Mr Goodman REALLY?" is so good
"You didn't identify him either, Your Honor," is the softest grenade lob ever! 😂
CoD player identified!
@@izzydanWTFwait till you find out that COD didn't invent grenades.
@@rebelsrequiem3763 lol ofc they didn't duh. It's just the way the sentence was phrased gave a CoD player vibe. You're clearly not about fun & games so you wouldn't get it
@izzydanWTF imma be real. COD was never a part of my childhood fully. That goes to Resident Evil. But that's like seeing someone talking about zombies and going, "Oh my god, Resident Evil fan spotted!!".
@rebelsrequiem3763 person likes zombies... someone makes resident evil reference... makes sense to me. People make references. It's a pretty common thing lol.
It's a crime that this show never won an Emmy.
wait what? that doenst sound right
Well, you better call Saul.
Very clever 😂
@@McKueen They were nominated for 50-some-odd awards over the course of six years, and won nothing.
But why?!
"Your honor, in my clients defense, he was in 'goblin mode' "
😂😂
That actually gave me a chuckle thanks
Understandable. Aquitted. Case closed.
Omg toooooooo funny 😁 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
"I'm just fucking with you your honor."
This actually happened with Jim Morrison and actor Tom Baker. Jim did some antics on a plane and when he went to trial shaved and had his hair looking like Baker. Stewardess couldn’t tell them apart. All charges dropped.
To my knowledge, this is an actual tactic that defense attorneys are allowed to use as long as they’ve cleared the maneuver with the judge first
The extra person probably needs to be on the witness list i would imagine, which the opposing counsel can request a copy of during discovery.
@@mattandersen2786 probably not. the extra person isn't going to testify and didn't witness anything.
and yes. this tactic is 100% valid but you need to tell the judge beforehand.
@@user-jz7vf5iq7h I think anyone participating in the court proceedings would need to be on the witness list and the guy basically took the place of the defendant for that part of the trial. Saul says the bartender from Belen has "a very good alibi" so at the very least Saul is going to have a witness statement and probably some other evidence that can be submitted as an exhibit in order to verify that alibi if they're asked to do so.
@@mattandersen2786 he was just mocking the fact that the man he had pointed couldn't be the culprit because he had "a very good alibi"
other than looking like the suspect, he isn't related to the case in any way so it would make no sense for him to make any statement.
@@user-jz7vf5iq7h You're very obviously talking about something you know very little about. If you knew anything about trial/court procedure, you would know that anyone participating in the court proceedings didn't just show up randomly one day. It all needs to be documented through witness lists, witness statements and exhibits. Hell, even Huell had to be on the witness list so he could bump into Chuck in the hallway and plant Jimmy's cell phone on him.
“You didn’t recognize him either, Your Honor.”
Made me laugh.
What’s the show’s name?
@@silasjimmy6690 Idk. Never seen it
@@themidknightmando3219 oh ok
@@silasjimmy6690Better Call Saul
@@Liquid_Ocelot1288whas the name of the show
“You want a CRIMINAL lawyer, not a criminal lawyer” J. Pinkman 😂
In other words, you need a criminal who is a lawyer not a lawyer who studied criminal law! 😅
@@abiodunadeyemi3812yeah thanks for that 🙂👍🏼
No lawyers go to heaven ...
@@abiodunadeyemi3812no shit
@@iamlegion5826 some will, cos not all of them practice law.
It proved that his client stole it.
It proved that anyone that looked like his client could have done it actually...... Specially when the only witness said I don't need time that's him and pointed at the wrong guy..... Created reasonable doubt.... Case done.
Nope. It cast reasonable doubt on the eyewitness testimony. And to be blunt, a preponderance of evidence should not be solely reliant on eyewitness testimony as it is very unreliable.
It exists mainly for two reasons. One is to help the defense/prosecution find leads to build up a case or to build up a defense with which they can then find empirical evidence to support. Ideally empirical evidence would lead to possible credibility of eyewitness testimony, and this could be used to sway the judge/jury.
The other reason is if there is not empirical evidence it can still have a small chance of swaying the judge or the jury if another witness corroborates the story, or if the sole witness is convincing enough or has enough details to be convincing enough to sound credible.
Either way, it does not mean the eyewitness testimony is reliable.
A lawyer never asks a question they don't already know the answer to.
A *good* lawyer never asks a question they don't already know the answer to
@@miro6017 and??????
"And your boyfriend's name is?"
@@visionsofpromiseand??????????????
???
No that would a very bad tactic
This single scene got me into the show. Best decision ever
I think I'm about to do the same.. I love lawyer shows.. I Heard of this show never knew it was Saul was a lawyer tho
@@HovaSwervedon’t expect too much lawyer stuff but BCS is hands down the greatest show to be made. Way better than BB
You have any lawyer shows/movies that you’d recommend?
@@HovaSwervethe show is called "better call Saul"
And you knew about it and it's name, yet you never figured out it's about Saul?
Excuse me what the fuck?
@MCoTEDDY Lol of course I knew it was about Saul, didn't know Saul was a lawyer tho, and that "type" lawyer
this scene is from season 5 ep 4
wouldnt u have already been into the show prior too this episode? unless you jumped right in at damn-near the end
This is the kind of lawyer you need in your corner if you are ever in trouble!😂
@@imacomputer101🤯 really? Nobody knew
Nah, you don't want a lawyer whose going to get disbarred for malpractice on day 1.
@@imacomputer101 you dont know what sarcasm is do you.
This is the kind of friend - dont need to be a lawyer. And to be fair what Jimmy is doing is more like a con-job than a bonafide legal tactic.
He’s gonna get u extra charges🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
what do you call
"50 lawyers at the bottom of the sea".
good start 😂😂😂
You're not drinking regular coffe but columbian decaffeinated coffee crystals
wat
@@Samsano-xz6hwIt’s a line from Breaking Bad. I’m not sure why he quoted here, though.
That’s from a Chris Farley skit on SNL not breaking bad.
YOU LIED TO ME
tea shop ceiling caffeine
"who are you?"
"Well today I'm an attorney, but otherwise........ I'm nobody."
😂
I love that reference
@@stxrdst "Where's the kitty cat bracelet? Futher mucker!!!!"
Well played, sir!
GREAT MOVIE!
to dream. . . . the impossible dream .. .
Judge: great we couldn't put a innocent man in jail
More like "ah man now I have to declare a mistrial and we have to run the whole thing again". He ain't getting acquitted based on this.
still better than any public pretender@@Bisonrulz16
Mission failed, we'll get em' next time
@@Bisonrulz16except he most 100% would be. Everything the prosecutor has against him would be declared as hearsay/perjury due to the lying witness.
@@isaacgeier6158 no. Jimmy broke protocol doing this, and a mistrial must be declared. You can't then use things that happened in a previous trial to make your argument in a new one. So no, he ain't getting acquitted based on THIS.
Thats the exact moment Kim realized Jimmy's brilliance
A lawyer can get into trouble for doing that. They have to get the judge's permission 1st.
I was looking for some info like this. I always wondered if this was possible. Guess not haha
@@Qwerty12345-r I had asked a lawyer what they do in this instance. They said they could have their client sit with other people in the gallery. Then they could ask the judge permission to see if they could ask the witness to point them out among the people.
Eh it's a TV show, made for an entertaining moment.
Now if someone tried this in real life, that's easily a fine at the very least.
This isn’t just any lawyer though. It’s Saul Goodman.
Yea there's no way this would fly in court. Its just a witty way of proving eye witnesses are good for fuck all.
If Saul tells you to check again, check again, re-check, then do another sweep for good measure
Otherwise he'll defecate through the sunroof
@@vivekanand9944I clicked on this comment to see the replies and I wasn't expecting that 😂😂
That itself would be used against you as a doubt lol its a lose lose 😅
Bro Ngl the bartender looked exactly like the defendant💀
I’m sayin😂 I would’ve made the same mistake
@@ItsMeBarnabyunless there’s a third person that looks like those two, the lawyer is actually making the case for the prosecution.
@@gvc76False. He can't tell the difference between 2 people which means there's doubt which means not guilty. That's why the police say in a line up it's better to say you don't know and not sure then pick the wrong person. Because picking the wrong person will ruin the ENTIRE case.
@@MegaSmokingMonkey I’d argue that this doesn’t apply when the person you falsely identify is essentially the defendant’s doppelgänger.
yup I was like they look the same
and this is why you need security cams in the store....
Everyone is angry at him like he just cheated the court room, but he really just proved his point 😂
At best it’s a mistrial. A waste of everyone’s time and the prosecutor files again, thus why everyone is annoyed. Jurors all wasted their time there and a new jury would be selected. So yeah, they are all angry. Where the show gets it wrong: worst case the lawyer is punished by the bar for intentionally violating court rules and deceiving the court and is suspended.
@@nathanp.3206 But honestly... He repeatedly asked him, and even told him to look carefully and he got it wrong.
@@nathanp.3206 The Jury would be happy if they got replaced bro.
Basically did
Its a very well written and funny scene. Idk why people in the comments are taking so seriously and so upset by it.
I felt that “Oh, Mr Goodman! Really?” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
How did it feel
Exactly what part of your body did you feel it in?
@@jamesreynolds852the frontal lob and mid-section of the brain?
@@Tevin-MKI personally felt it directly in my scrotum
@@Tevin-MKyou don’t feel your brain, you experience feelings in your brain