Raspberry Pi Pico Vs Arduino Nano
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ม.ค. 2021
- The Raspberry Pi Foundation today introduced a new $4 microcontroller board, the Pico. It uses a brand new custom dual-core Arm M0+ processor, the RP2040. This video compares its features with Arduino Nano board ones.
**********************************************
Music provided by NCS.
**********************************************
Nice video. Nicely matched properties.Thanks 😃
Arduino i2c: A4 and A5
yeah
Arduino nano has 1 i2c
yes on pin A5 and A4.
WTF raspberry? I wait for some amazing board, but this is a little more powerfull than a stm32, in 2021! Esp8266 and esp32 are a century in future.
Indeed. In terms of price/performance ratio, the only real competitor for this board are the various ESP32 boards. The major difference between them is that one offers fewer GPIOs but has extensive wireless features, and the other has more (and more flexible) GPIO, device and host USB, but no radio. Both SDKs run MicroPython. ESP32’s dual cores run FreeRTOS, but it won’t be very long before that playing field is levelled. So basically it’s down to WiFi vs USB.
Making an actual product with the ESP32 or ESP8266 would be much more expensive if you don’t need wireless as it would need a lot more compliance testing for radio interference.
ESP32 has horrible documentation, to the level that it is unusable for me. RP2040's documentation is possibly the best I've ever seen.
Either this video is biased or Arduino nano sales are dropping to nothing
Only facts 😅
The Nano was out of date when it was launched. The development environment, and being 5V compatible are its primary advantage. The EEPROM is not really an advantage when you have 2MB of Flash.
The PICO is going to become very popular in this market, assuming there are no issues found with the hardware.
Of course, it will be a key player in the game.
Totally uninspired and useless video. Just comparing the specs. How about how hard it is to program the Pico with C? You need to press the button and reboot and upload a new file everytime you recompile. How about missing developer tools and so on.
It won't be that hard if you get used to a programming language. But you are right, the Pico is a bit harder to programme than the nano.
I can see MicroPython with PIO accelerators for the I/O will be the initial development platform, with people moving on to C/C++ later for speed. I see this as a good path for learning embedded programming.
@@PJElliot Not everybody still needs to learn embeddedprogramming.
Well Arduino announced that their IDE will officially support Raspberry PI Pico soon . Because they are also releasing a board with RP2040
arduino also uses a modified version of C