@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre Looking forward to it!! - Pulse-jets.com is a good community forum and the GTBA Facebook page would love to see this! facebook.com/groups/1520381154734938/
Hi! As you know, I also devoted a lot of time to studying this Tesla patent. He also spent a huge amount of time and effort to achieve a satisfactory result in the operation of this combustion chamber. Therefore, please heed my advice). When the combustion chamber works "in resonance" - as you say, this is actually a simple self-oscillating combustion process. The self-oscillating process is very different from intermittent combustion. When the self-oscillating combustion mode is set, the spark plug is not required - this is true, but the pressure in the combustion chamber does not exceed the air supply pressure from the compressor. When the combustion chamber operates in pulsating combustion mode, the ignition source (spark plug) is necessary, but also the pressure in the combustion chamber is much higher than the air supply pressure from the compressor. I have encountered these phenomena many times. This is exactly what I recommend you to focus on the peak pressure in the combustion chamber (during its operation), then you will understand how exactly the changes made or the adjustment of the air and fuel supply affect the efficiency. Try to set the maximum high frequency of the spark plug, let it work constantly, the spark should be as powerful as possible. Further, place several remote washers under the plug so that the spark gap is as far away from the main volume of the combustion chamber as possible. It is best to supply air and fuel through one valve, that is, an already finished combustible mixture. Only supply fuel and air in front of the valve does not stand, if the flow section of the valve is large, ignition will occur inside the valve!!! I made a threaded hole about in the middle of the valve, and fuel was supplied to it, through the same Tesla valve, but of a smaller size. Try it and get a lot of better results. I managed to reach the maximum pressure in the combustion chamber during its operation of 4 bar, provided that air and propane were supplied under atmospheric pressure.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre The tesla valve on the inlet allows the detonation chamber to reach higher than inlet pressure. I would have thought adding the water jet just at the compression stage as the chamber narrows would allow the H2O to separate by superheating and compression? p.s. the original design you used for separate air and fuel inlets is safer..
I know you are an experienced Tesla replicator. However Tesla does write in the patent "After a short lapse of time the chamber becomes heated to such a degree that the ignition device may be shut off without disturbing the established regime." Therefore, this is the way it should be done. You need to add a water jacket and water jets to your build and then propel the turbine using the super heated steam!
@@El_Croc why is it safer? In 1928 Tesla tried to patent the apparatus and method for a "Self-Propelled Vehicle". This version featured 1 valvular conduit. This was his later design.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre that's awesome. I've been diving into rocket science a bunch, so if you would like assistance please don't hesitate to ask. We can also try and calculate how much thrust you'd be putting out. I think if the shape is revised into a 3 dimensional tear drop you may get more efficiency
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre I have been working with Jeremiah on that, I definitely think that was Tesla's original intention. I build really efficient Brown's gas cells, and I proved without any shadow of a doubt that they are ridiculously over Unity on. I can get significantly better results with everything running properly. However just for simplicity if I run my cell on brute Force DC current, I get 60 liters per hour at 185 Watts conservatively and with fluctuating output. 423.3 cubic feet 1KG of H2 423.3cf is 11986.5 Liters of H2 is 33.322KWH adding 3995.5 liters of O2 makes it worth about 130KWH 2.78Watts 1Liter of H2 1 Liter of H2&O2 is worth 7.228watts 166.85 watts 60L 111watts 40L H2 433.68watts 40L of H2 20L of O2 199.7 LPM of H2 is 1KG per Hr 266.36LPM of BG is 1KG per hr. 53,272watts at 200w per LPM. 1LPM of H2&O2 is 433.68 watt Hrs 1.72LPM is 1HP. 3.44LPM at 50% So I'm producing one horsepower at less than 320 Watts. And I believe the Jeremiah's Tesla turbine will be really close to 100% efficiency. I have been chomping at the bit to test this for months.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre But I think a very interesting test would be to Simply measure thrust from a pulse detonation Rocket engine. The main thing stopping me is I live in town and have police calling neighbors currently. We have a very annoying sound ordinance. And a PDE on Brown's gas is going to be ridiculously loud. And by the way I'm not sure if you know this or not. But if the engine breathes air and has a valve it's a pulse jet engine. A PDE has no valve but instead has a oxygen supply and technically classifies as a rocket not a jet.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre I would really like to see his denied patent. I'm extremely suspicious Tesla is the actual inventor of the Bob Boyce style flat plate cell. I think he used round plates and it looked really similar to his turbine. Hell his Tesla turbine almost is a Brown's gas generator LoL.
That’s understandable. I have a feeling that a rain drop shape will yield the best results. So, if you get a chance to run the math on it you may find great results or not so great.
@@Graemecns this was an update from the community tab section. th-cam.com/channels/4uJgCHU3s4AOA-uT5SDA4w.htmlcommunity?lb=UgyGKXcb9XmwtNFuo814AaABCQ If it doesn't load when you click the link, hit refresh. I have had this problem and a few others have too. I think it depends on which browser you are using. Here is a free Patreon post I made with the files hoping someone would replicate the experiments I made. www.patreon.com/posts/40719631 I didn't have the funds to build an all metal turbine at the time and ended up pursuing a different version which is simpler and doesn't use flammable gas or liquid. If I had pursued it I would have also needed a gas analyser to check the emissions. I am fairly certain that once the steam was introduced the emissions changed for the better. I say this after working on petrol and diesel engines since the mid 90s. I'm fairly confident it could be operated indoors as a heater of epic proportions. I'm 42 next month. It is probably the simplest / easiest / cheapest gas engine to tune that I have come across in my life.
Yeah, impressive device, beautifully done! Thank you for sharing! It sound nicely tuned chamber with flute outlet. & thermal photo looks like a space ship already!:P Wow! Bravo!
The ignition has already reached self ignition status and the wire isn’t actually doing anything. A glow plug could do the same initial job. To heat the chamber.
Measure the average pressure in the combustion chamber... Without this meaning, your writings do not matter much. If the average overpressure does not exceed 1-1.5 bar (provided that air and fuel are supplied to the combustion chamber at atmospheric pressure), it is a failure.
It is supposed to be a super heated steam boiler with negative pressure. Cold steam is much more expansive. 100C = 1,700 times the volume of water. 17.5C = 67,000 times the volume of water.... go colder and the expansion ratio is even higher!
Watch the previous video and you will realise the wire to the plug is redundant. I just didn't disconnect it this time. In this link there is no wire! th-cam.com/video/M1cnu7GCIcI/w-d-xo.html
In Tesla's patent is reads "After a short lapse of time the chamber becomes heated to such a degree that the ignition device may be shut off without disturbing the established regime." I just replicated what the patent said. teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-1329559-valvular-conduit
Here is one of my videos that were not published on the TH-cam (loaded specifically for you), which shows the mode of the self-oscillating combustion process - as soon as the combustion chamber switches to this mode of operation - the nozzle begins to heat up a lot, and the jet speed decreases greatly: th-cam.com/video/68XlW5vV65w/w-d-xo.html
@@cushionofair I’m thinking the ultimate is vacuumed to the point of boiling from a tank. At 17.5C the steam is approximately 67,000 times the volume of the water. 1 litre of water can supply a lot of steam!
Just to start it. Tesla writes: "After a short lapse of time the chamber becomes heated to such a degree that the ignition device may be shut off without disturbing the established regime."
Adding a rocket exhaust I bet it would have a decent amount of thrust. Needs to be tested. I did design the part but it was going to need to be spark eroded a lot and I never had the funds spare to try it. It would make a decent experiment.
I'm surprised it's still combusting and not putting the flame out. I see bubbling happening in the water tank, it must suck some oxygen in from the water tank. A second one way seems like a more efficient design. How about adding a needle valve on the oxygen input so you could adjust the flow rate of the oxygen?
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre The oxygen has to come from somewhere for the combustion to occur. Without the oxygen input, the combustion reaction must occur at the exhaust and not inside in the chamber. Because there is oxygen available at the exhaust line. I assume the fitting for your oxygen valvular conduit is sealed when nothing is attached. Is that correct? This is potentially problematic because I assume at some point you will connect this to a tesla turbine, without the added oxygen, you will still see a flame on the exhaust and likely still see steam, but it will occur after it has passed through the turbine.
I wonder if you should also include a valvular conduit to the water line? Seeing the bubble in the water probably indicates that some of the gas is pushing its way to the water tank.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre You might consider using a stainless union fitting. Those do not have any rubber inside them. You just crank them down with a wrench and the beveled connector creates an air tight seal. Like these: static.grainger.com/rp/s/is/image/Grainger/12G099_AS01 I think the second valve is doing a lot, it is providing air inside the chamber so the combustion happens in the right location. If the second valve wasn't important, Tesla would have left it out. He was obsessed with making things simple! :-) Here is a simple way to test it... Attach a 50cm+ pipe to the exhaust and measure the temperature with and without the O2 valvular conduit and measure the heat. My bet is that with the O2 valvular conduit attached you will see higher heat inside the teardrop chamber (that's what you want). Without it, you will see the majority of the heat at the end of the pipe where the gas can mix with the atmospheric air.
To be honest I’m not sure. If it’s flammable and gravity fed it’s possible. One I do know for certain is when the propane I used was combined with the steam, the emissions definitely changed for the better.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre well that would be an achievement if done, other experiments to consider might be steam on charcoal to form another gaseous flame, as well as using the super heated steam to melt plastics into fuel, these things could be possibly done to do 2 processes at once using the high heat and pressure steam, it might actually serve multiple purposes, activated charcoal is made using such a steam but charcoal plus steam in such an environment forms another type of fuel, so in essence there could be multiple components that might aid such a system, with waste plastic being super heated and turned into fuel that can possibly be used to fuel if using waste oil... also the charcoal again as a whole another source of energy, in essence such systems can be extremely efficient feeding back in on itself in looping systems, I really like how Taiwan uses a highly efficient incinerator to turn garbage into electricity and basically all these processes can be combined, but such an engine can for sure regulate temperature of a tesla turbine and since a tesla turbine can be multiplied in scale again using waste oil or some other waste component you can possibly use the excess heat energy to also turn things into fuel to further help run such a system, I was always interested in the idea that a fuel source whether solid or liquid such as charcoal or waste oil and air + a little bit of water could prove to be more efficient at giving energy than just fire and energy alone and not just in conversion of heating a water source in order to create steam but rather combine the steam with the combustion process especially considering that charcoal when heated in presence of steam forms another gaseous fuel, anyways such a system could be used to incorporate solid and liquid components all feeding back in on itself to feed one large tesla turbine that is regulated by that one engine in essence, kind of like the idea that when small amounts of water are super heated that the oxygen and hydrogen break apart and help form the energy into the process to be more efficient, since it's in pulses the tesla turbine which usually speeds up too much would be regulated and using a metal such as aluminum bronze which is a highly resistant to corrosion metal and almost on par with stainless steel, itll last about 900 years in sea water, such a metal would help resist the intense steam, you need a metal or material that withstand high steam and pressure and temperature and more than just strength not corrode, steel is good for strength but corrosion becomes a problem, but fire + air + water with tiny amounts of water so the temperature was high enough to break apart the bonds of water was always a thought in my mind, if it's that efficient ar heating a small space then it shows the latent potential energy not being harvested in normal engines or even normal steam engines, the chamber is probably just a stable design that allows the components to mesh In a nice degree but the design seems for for durability and direction and it looks like a drop of water a design that was probably gotten from nature, the shape allows the energy to go in one direction, I'm just unsure about the hz and frequency and how that factors into the design but my best guess would be helping with the water somehow in breaking its molecules into hydrogen/ oxygen to further enrich the flame, a bio diesel can also be made using waste fuel if it doesnt work with pure waste oil etc... but I'm sure the system can be configured to have enough heat to run such a system, also encasing the engine in an aircrete mixture or some sort of insulation to further improve heat etc.. energy and loss
I've no idea what this does but its awesome. I want one. Id suspect 01 tool steel or similar would last longer with the temps, but I understand aluminium is a bit easier to prototype with.
Also if you do try HHO, graphite plates are 3x more efficient than stainless at same wattage. Unless you go down the meyer route. th-cam.com/video/CuZ5WxYwl4g/w-d-xo.html
Must be your 6th sense! Stainless Steel will do much better than this prototype using aluminum which was to save on machining costs. Cherry red on the brass might indicate things are getting a bit too hot for the aluminum. This is why I pulled the 🔌 plug as I didn’t want a molten mess. British Patent 174,544 indicates to use a higher temperature around 1100F - 660F are Tesla’s own figures. He points out that his design will convert 1100F to velocity using a diverging nozzle and for that velocity to impinge on a rotor via adhesion will convert velocity of detonation shockwave into angular momentum. The valvular conduit method negates needing a second stage at all. I think the Venturi method is superior in flow if a second stage vacuum pump connected by a fluid gearbox is utilized.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre nice. I understand some of this (im not too familiar with tesla s work) but am following along with interest and have my own machine shop so may even reproduce some stuff. Do you have an online forum outside youtube?
@@johnharding2912 Hi John, building something functional is the best way to learn. I have an open source 3D printed design that has already been replicated and done over 200,000rpm which has a one inch diameter rotor. Also we have a Patreon site www.patreon.com/TeslaTurbo There are a mix of technical and none technical Patrons, so we cater for all. Cheers, Paul
I'm confused by this. You have the fuel coming through the valvular conduit and the air inlet just open. The valve of pulse engines are on the air intake...I think you've made a bunson burner not a pulse jet... Isn't valvular conduit supposed to replace the reed valves or tuned pipe of other pulse jet designs allowing air (oxydiser) to come into the combustion chamber but prevent combustion pressure from escaping. Then the exhaust length is tuned so you get a pulsing cycle of ignition, exhaust, ignition exhaust.. Whereby the negative pressure pulse from the exhaust pulls fresh air into the combustion chamber where it mixes with fuel, explodes and sends another pressure pulse down the exhaust creating another negative pressure pulse pulling new air in . Pulse engines don't sound like that, they roar like an unsilnced interval combustion engine.. Which is what they are..
Bunsen burners burn fuel continuously. Whereas this engine with no moving parts does it in pulses very efficiently. Less than 250hz equals pulse jet and over 250hz is pulse detonation. The purpose of the device is to produce super heated steam at low pressure to propel a Tesla turbine. When finished it will be more efficient than any petrol engine ever could be due the the high RPMs obtainable. Even formula 1 has only reached 21,000rpm. I have reached 47,000rpm with a 5” rotor and 280,000rpm with a 28mm miniature rotor. I do need to make a video that goes into more detail about the machine granted. Just setting up in the new workshop now and firing this back up is on the cards!
The compressed air and propane are being mixed in one valvular conduit and the other side is a spring loaded hydraulic fixing that with nothing connected will be shut completely.
You should check out TH-camr iEnergySupplys videos on the subject if you want to hear a loud one. The size of the exhaust on mine is why it is quiet. Just like any engine the more fuel you consume and explode in a shorter window the louder it will be. After hours of testing the gauge on the gas bottle still reads full. The purpose of this device is to produce rapidly expanding super heated steam in an ultra efficient way. When connected to a Tesla turbine of a certain construction it will most likely get quieter. Do we want loud engines in anything other than sports cars?
The apparatus for making super heated steam is usually cumbersome, dangerous and expensive. Tesla figured a much better way. The reason it hasn’t been exploited is because few people understand what the invention is. Currently this is the only version on TH-cam that I know of projecting low pressure super heated steam. When this is combined with the turbine it will all make sense. I had hoped that someone would pick up the baton from me and run with it but as this hasn’t happened it might be me that connects this to the turbine first. Then people can see what it was actually designed for. There are a couple of TH-camrs that have connected a turbine to the device. However they have not made a water jacket / jet system that produces super heated steam to my knowledge. This is pretty critical if you have it attached to a Tesla turbine and you want decent torque from heat rather than pressure. Using a diverging nozzle converts the heat to velocity and the the turbine converts that via adhesion to mechanical rotation.
Ok, air/fuel mixed in the conduit that makes more Sense. The hz thing isn't what defines a detonation engine though. A detonation engine uses detonation of fuel instead of deflagration. Its about pressure, in lower pressures of normal engine and pulse jets you get Deflagration, which is the normal subsonic propogation of a flame. Detonation is rapid, supersonic, and more efficient propogation of a flame front that you get with more volitile fuels at higher pressure. Like hydrogen+oxygen combined under high pressure.
I realise and say the same stuff after it stops running. Wasn’t a planned video and my skills in filming were not too great at the time. I’ll get a decent camera and microphone as soon as I can afford it.
Im sure it won't detonate outside of the resonant cavity. I think the big boys have been playing with the Schumann resonance recently... that's a much greater concern i.m.o..
I would like that thanks. I was watching a live feed that was just taken down.. Also- maybe the T.T. is supposed to run on the expansion and heat of the combusting Nitrogen instead of steam?
Doo ooh, 'Dancing magnets' scared the shit out of me. Lmao. Schuman Resonance peaked on 22/5 at 165hz before the feed got cut. And everything is a magnet... Imagine what you could do with 3500 low orbit stationary satellites..
I've been following your work and I think I'm understanding it. Im not hands on with this stuff like you. Your awesome. Keep up the amazing work good fellow!! I will spend time thinking about it. I've been following anything I could find relating to Tesla's work for 30 years now. I think in terms of frequency and resonance. Is it possible that the conduit valve also creates the resonant frequency of Nitrogen?Is it possible that the pulse jet acts as an ignition and induces a self sustaining frequency in the valve, thus running the turbine on frequency induced Nitrogen expansion/ combustion? I get that the Tesla notes and your work have been focusing on low pressure heat tranfers systems. Maybe the. Heart tranfer would accelerate the turbine and depressurize the Nitrogen expansion.. hmmm
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre water you get water. If you add to air and burn you get nitrous oxide that burns and makes water. Add hydrogen peroxide and you get no left over water from the hydrogen and get more water from the nitrogen. Nitrogen is a bitch in its acid form, hydrogen in its acid form hell I would drink 7 litres of that a day 😉
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre OK I am dicking around with radar absorbing materials atm. I will give it a read in my down time and see if I can get my head into it. One of my trades is aluminium anodiser and we use nitric acid it is a messy mean bitch. Any thing that can make nitrous dioxide can make huge power that and kerosene will get you to space.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre HHO make pure water. A couple of volts, some stainless steel fly screen and a liter of urine and you are making it. It burns in your motor and the exhaust is pure water h20
Quick flick through the book. Sorry but the periodic table says nitrogen is answer number seven. Although Tesla nailed some great life advice that proved that he was ahead of the times. Tea, coffee, tabacoo and other stimulates are bad for you. Hydrogen is the answer. Crack that and ever other atom is your bitch. Hydrogen bomb 💣 just saying. 🤷♂️
wow. I can build a coil that can make more then 140kv your going to need a voltage multiplier made of diodes and capacitors and it will all have to be submerged in oil to insulate it. be careful
I can put my hand over a kettle and the steam will burn my hand. I cannot put my hand within 2 meters of the exhaust of this. If you Google "is super heated steam invisible" or "is steam invisible" you will get something like "Steam is water in the gas phase. ... Steam that is saturated or super heated is invisible; however, "steam" often refers to wet steam, the visible mist or aerosol of water droplets formed as water vapour condenses." The behavior of the device with the water jacket and water dripping into the exhaust and instantly turning to steam was quite different to how it behaved before without the water. It ran better, got much hotter and to top it off the emissions changed for the better, perhaps even good enough to run indoors. I would have to put a gas analyser on the exhaust to truly know if that it true. I have spent many years around vehicles running indoors, with extraction and without so this is something I'm very familiar with.
@@rchristie5401 that is LPG (Propane) being combusted in pulses that are self igniting. If the speed is made to go higher then these combustions will turn into detonations. The water literally drips into the exhaust and comes out as super heated steam. Watch the previous videos without the water addition and I can put my hand near the exhaust. With the super heated steam I couldn't put my hand within two meters. Also notice in this video the water tank bubbling at a rate of about 1 drop per second. I was using 0.5mm brass water inlet and exhaust jet into the chamber. It also heated up my workshop which was 1350 sq ft rapidly. Before adding the water it didn't do this. The amount of LPG used was minimal too. After hours of testing the gauge on the small tank still reads full.
Fantastic!! on the edge of my seat to see what happens next!
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre Looking forward to it!! - Pulse-jets.com is a good community forum and the GTBA Facebook page would love to see this! facebook.com/groups/1520381154734938/
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre The GTBA one should be approved now ;-)
Finally in the 21st century more of Tesla genius coming into focus. Hang on to your hat!
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre please upload the results, i had thought about this modification
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre bell would make it supersonic at the exhaust and subsonic at the inner piece
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre try bell, theres nothing wrong in trying and compilating info about the try
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre already want to see those Hz increase drastically ;)
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre no problem!
Hi! As you know, I also devoted a lot of time to studying this Tesla patent. He also spent a huge amount of time and effort to achieve a satisfactory result in the operation of this combustion chamber. Therefore, please heed my advice).
When the combustion chamber works "in resonance" - as you say, this is actually a simple self-oscillating combustion process. The self-oscillating process is very different from intermittent combustion. When the self-oscillating combustion mode is set, the spark plug is not required - this is true, but the pressure in the combustion chamber does not exceed the air supply pressure from the compressor. When the combustion chamber operates in pulsating combustion mode, the ignition source (spark plug) is necessary, but also the pressure in the combustion chamber is much higher than the air supply pressure from the compressor.
I have encountered these phenomena many times. This is exactly what I recommend you to focus on the peak pressure in the combustion chamber (during its operation), then you will understand how exactly the changes made or the adjustment of the air and fuel supply affect the efficiency.
Try to set the maximum high frequency of the spark plug, let it work constantly, the spark should be as powerful as possible. Further, place several remote washers under the plug so that the spark gap is as far away from the main volume of the combustion chamber as possible. It is best to supply air and fuel through one valve, that is, an already finished combustible mixture. Only supply fuel and air in front of the valve does not stand, if the flow section of the valve is large, ignition will occur inside the valve!!! I made a threaded hole about in the middle of the valve, and fuel was supplied to it, through the same Tesla valve, but of a smaller size. Try it and get a lot of better results. I managed to reach the maximum pressure in the combustion chamber during its operation of 4 bar, provided that air and propane were supplied under atmospheric pressure.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre
The tesla valve on the inlet allows the detonation chamber to reach higher than inlet pressure.
I would have thought adding the water jet just at the compression stage as the chamber narrows would allow the H2O to separate by superheating and compression?
p.s. the original design you used for separate air and fuel inlets is safer..
I know you are an experienced Tesla replicator. However Tesla does write in the patent "After a short lapse of time the chamber becomes heated to such a degree that the ignition device may be shut off without disturbing the established regime."
Therefore, this is the way it should be done. You need to add a water jacket and water jets to your build and then propel the turbine using the super heated steam!
@@El_Croc why is it safer? In 1928 Tesla tried to patent the apparatus and method for a "Self-Propelled Vehicle". This version featured 1 valvular conduit. This was his later design.
DUDE, NOW ALL MAKES SENSE, TY VERY MUCH FROM SOUTHERN BRASIL ! VIVA TESLA VIVA URUGUAY VIVA ARGENTINA VIVA MARADONA !
Thank you man
Good show! Waiting to see the updates version/s! Enjoy!
Cheers Mike!
Holy crap, congrats man! Huge accomplishment
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre that's awesome. I've been diving into rocket science a bunch, so if you would like assistance please don't hesitate to ask. We can also try and calculate how much thrust you'd be putting out. I think if the shape is revised into a 3 dimensional tear drop you may get more efficiency
I have been really wanting to try this with Brown's gas.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre
I have been working with Jeremiah on that, I definitely think that was Tesla's original intention. I build really efficient Brown's gas cells, and I proved without any shadow of a doubt that they are ridiculously over Unity on. I can get significantly better results with everything running properly. However just for simplicity if I run my cell on brute Force DC current, I get 60 liters per hour at 185 Watts conservatively and with fluctuating output.
423.3 cubic feet 1KG of H2 423.3cf is 11986.5 Liters of H2 is 33.322KWH
adding 3995.5 liters of O2 makes it worth about 130KWH 2.78Watts 1Liter of H2
1 Liter of H2&O2 is worth 7.228watts
166.85 watts 60L 111watts 40L H2
433.68watts 40L of H2 20L of O2
199.7 LPM of H2 is 1KG per Hr 266.36LPM of BG is 1KG per hr. 53,272watts at 200w per LPM.
1LPM of H2&O2 is 433.68 watt Hrs
1.72LPM is 1HP. 3.44LPM at 50%
So I'm producing one horsepower at less than 320 Watts. And I believe the Jeremiah's Tesla turbine will be really close to 100% efficiency. I have been chomping at the bit to test this for months.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre
But I think a very interesting test would be to Simply measure thrust from a pulse detonation Rocket engine. The main thing stopping me is I live in town and have police calling neighbors currently. We have a very annoying sound ordinance. And a PDE on Brown's gas is going to be ridiculously loud. And by the way I'm not sure if you know this or not. But if the engine breathes air and has a valve it's a pulse jet engine. A PDE has no valve but instead has a oxygen supply and technically classifies as a rocket not a jet.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre
I would really like to see his denied patent. I'm extremely suspicious Tesla is the actual inventor of the Bob Boyce style flat plate cell. I think he used round plates and it looked really similar to his turbine. Hell his Tesla turbine almost is a Brown's gas generator LoL.
A stunningly simple engine ❤️
Grav Inert difficult to find the right words.
Incredible? Or amazing?
Incredible amazingness is probably the closest I can get 🤣
do you have the model files for this (assuming its CNC machined) also @integza may be interested
Why not add a water gallery not through the combustion chamber? Unless the water/steam velocity is aided by the expansion of propagation??
I'm using 0.5mm water jets in this video. The jet size can be increase for more power just like a carburetor.
Do you think the energy output would be increased if you made the chamber more of a spherical tear rather than having the flat walls?
That’s understandable. I have a feeling that a rain drop shape will yield the best results. So, if you get a chance to run the math on it you may find great results or not so great.
I'm not sure but the theme seems to be the converging nozzle before exhaust. Lots of variable to experiment with.
I wish we could hear what you are saying over the noise of the PDE
Everything I said, I said it again after I stopped it, as I realised I was most likely muffled.
You could probably put some marker or chalk on the housing to measure the temperatures better since the aluminium is so reflective to IR.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre Not sure, I at least haven't noticed any difference with anodised but I also don't have much experience with it tbh.
Yeah good call, I should get the aluminium type 2 or 3 anodised.
Is this a Detonation engine? It does not seem to have a supersonic wave emitting from the combustion Chamber?
This isn't the final machine it is one step in the process of replicating the apparatus from Tesla's 1920 patent that was submitted in 1916.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre have you had any updates on it in the last year maybe a video.
@@Graemecns this was an update from the community tab section. th-cam.com/channels/4uJgCHU3s4AOA-uT5SDA4w.htmlcommunity?lb=UgyGKXcb9XmwtNFuo814AaABCQ If it doesn't load when you click the link, hit refresh. I have had this problem and a few others have too. I think it depends on which browser you are using.
Here is a free Patreon post I made with the files hoping someone would replicate the experiments I made.
www.patreon.com/posts/40719631
I didn't have the funds to build an all metal turbine at the time and ended up pursuing a different version which is simpler and doesn't use flammable gas or liquid.
If I had pursued it I would have also needed a gas analyser to check the emissions.
I am fairly certain that once the steam was introduced the emissions changed for the better. I say this after working on petrol and diesel engines since the mid 90s. I'm fairly confident it could be operated indoors as a heater of epic proportions.
I'm 42 next month. It is probably the simplest / easiest / cheapest gas engine to tune that I have come across in my life.
Yeah, impressive device, beautifully done! Thank you for sharing!
It sound nicely tuned chamber with flute outlet. & thermal photo looks like a space ship already!:P
Wow! Bravo!
Pulse jet boiler...🕵 I love it.💗
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre Hell yeah!
Would you publish the CAD file pleaze
Smooth running!
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre rock on!
How is it that the + of the ignition coil is powering the sparkplug? Weird! What's the HV of the coil connected to? It's hard to see...
The ignition has already reached self ignition status and the wire isn’t actually doing anything.
A glow plug could do the same initial job. To heat the chamber.
Measure the average pressure in the combustion chamber...
Without this meaning, your writings do not matter much. If the average overpressure does not exceed 1-1.5 bar (provided that air and fuel are supplied to the combustion chamber at atmospheric pressure), it is a failure.
It is supposed to be a super heated steam boiler with negative pressure. Cold steam is much more expansive. 100C = 1,700 times the volume of water. 17.5C = 67,000 times the volume of water.... go colder and the expansion ratio is even higher!
How is self igniting achieved when you have a spark plug wired to a coil and an electrical source!!!
good luck
Watch the previous video and you will realise the wire to the plug is redundant. I just didn't disconnect it this time. In this link there is no wire! th-cam.com/video/M1cnu7GCIcI/w-d-xo.html
It needs the spark plug or a glow plug to start it, then the ignition device is redundant until switched off.
In Tesla's patent is reads "After a short lapse of time the chamber becomes heated to such a degree that the ignition device may be shut off without disturbing the established regime." I just replicated what the patent said. teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-1329559-valvular-conduit
Awesome
Here is one of my videos that were not published on the TH-cam (loaded specifically for you), which shows the mode of the self-oscillating combustion process - as soon as the combustion chamber switches to this mode of operation - the nozzle begins to heat up a lot, and the jet speed decreases greatly:
th-cam.com/video/68XlW5vV65w/w-d-xo.html
Maybe you could surround it with a water chamber to preheat the water and cool the Tesla Pulse Detonation Engine .Looking good !
Yes it could be connected to a chamber of water acting as a water battery.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre would it help to use an ultra sonic fog maker to deliver the water vapor?
@@cushionofair I’m thinking the ultimate is vacuumed to the point of boiling from a tank. At 17.5C the steam is approximately 67,000 times the volume of the water. 1 litre of water can supply a lot of steam!
What's the ignition pulse rate?
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre 😲😁👍
When are you going to power a tesla turbine with it like Tesla Tech?
Yes or a Tesla engine. Using super heated steam initially until a higher vacuum is achieved and then cold steam.
will the spark plug need to keep to work or just for start?
Just to start it. Tesla writes: "After a short lapse of time the chamber becomes heated to such a degree that the ignition device may be shut off without disturbing the established regime."
how much thrust it have?
Adding a rocket exhaust I bet it would have a decent amount of thrust. Needs to be tested. I did design the part but it was going to need to be spark eroded a lot and I never had the funds spare to try it. It would make a decent experiment.
Why do you only have a single 1 way valve in this one?
I'm surprised it's still combusting and not putting the flame out. I see bubbling happening in the water tank, it must suck some oxygen in from the water tank. A second one way seems like a more efficient design. How about adding a needle valve on the oxygen input so you could adjust the flow rate of the oxygen?
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre The oxygen has to come from somewhere for the combustion to occur. Without the oxygen input, the combustion reaction must occur at the exhaust and not inside in the chamber. Because there is oxygen available at the exhaust line. I assume the fitting for your oxygen valvular conduit is sealed when nothing is attached. Is that correct?
This is potentially problematic because I assume at some point you will connect this to a tesla turbine, without the added oxygen, you will still see a flame on the exhaust and likely still see steam, but it will occur after it has passed through the turbine.
I wonder if you should also include a valvular conduit to the water line? Seeing the bubble in the water probably indicates that some of the gas is pushing its way to the water tank.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre You might consider using a stainless union fitting. Those do not have any rubber inside them. You just crank them down with a wrench and the beveled connector creates an air tight seal. Like these: static.grainger.com/rp/s/is/image/Grainger/12G099_AS01
I think the second valve is doing a lot, it is providing air inside the chamber so the combustion happens in the right location. If the second valve wasn't important, Tesla would have left it out. He was obsessed with making things simple! :-)
Here is a simple way to test it... Attach a 50cm+ pipe to the exhaust and measure the temperature with and without the O2 valvular conduit and measure the heat. My bet is that with the O2 valvular conduit attached you will see higher heat inside the teardrop chamber (that's what you want). Without it, you will see the majority of the heat at the end of the pipe where the gas can mix with the atmospheric air.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre I don't think so. I'm searching for it now, but haven't found it yet
Thermal efficiency?
I'm not sure but I have hardly used any propane in all the experiments and the tank gauge still shows full.
Could this be done using waste oil?
To be honest I’m not sure. If it’s flammable and gravity fed it’s possible. One I do know for certain is when the propane I used was combined with the steam, the emissions definitely changed for the better.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre well that would be an achievement if done, other experiments to consider might be steam on charcoal to form another gaseous flame, as well as using the super heated steam to melt plastics into fuel, these things could be possibly done to do 2 processes at once using the high heat and pressure steam, it might actually serve multiple purposes, activated charcoal is made using such a steam but charcoal plus steam in such an environment forms another type of fuel, so in essence there could be multiple components that might aid such a system, with waste plastic being super heated and turned into fuel that can possibly be used to fuel if using waste oil... also the charcoal again as a whole another source of energy, in essence such systems can be extremely efficient feeding back in on itself in looping systems, I really like how Taiwan uses a highly efficient incinerator to turn garbage into electricity and basically all these processes can be combined, but such an engine can for sure regulate temperature of a tesla turbine and since a tesla turbine can be multiplied in scale again using waste oil or some other waste component you can possibly use the excess heat energy to also turn things into fuel to further help run such a system, I was always interested in the idea that a fuel source whether solid or liquid such as charcoal or waste oil and air + a little bit of water could prove to be more efficient at giving energy than just fire and energy alone and not just in conversion of heating a water source in order to create steam but rather combine the steam with the combustion process especially considering that charcoal when heated in presence of steam forms another gaseous fuel, anyways such a system could be used to incorporate solid and liquid components all feeding back in on itself to feed one large tesla turbine that is regulated by that one engine in essence, kind of like the idea that when small amounts of water are super heated that the oxygen and hydrogen break apart and help form the energy into the process to be more efficient, since it's in pulses the tesla turbine which usually speeds up too much would be regulated and using a metal such as aluminum bronze which is a highly resistant to corrosion metal and almost on par with stainless steel, itll last about 900 years in sea water, such a metal would help resist the intense steam, you need a metal or material that withstand high steam and pressure and temperature and more than just strength not corrode, steel is good for strength but corrosion becomes a problem, but fire + air + water with tiny amounts of water so the temperature was high enough to break apart the bonds of water was always a thought in my mind, if it's that efficient ar heating a small space then it shows the latent potential energy not being harvested in normal engines or even normal steam engines, the chamber is probably just a stable design that allows the components to mesh In a nice degree but the design seems for for durability and direction and it looks like a drop of water a design that was probably gotten from nature, the shape allows the energy to go in one direction, I'm just unsure about the hz and frequency and how that factors into the design but my best guess would be helping with the water somehow in breaking its molecules into hydrogen/ oxygen to further enrich the flame, a bio diesel can also be made using waste fuel if it doesnt work with pure waste oil etc... but I'm sure the system can be configured to have enough heat to run such a system, also encasing the engine in an aircrete mixture or some sort of insulation to further improve heat etc.. energy and loss
oooo nice sound
I've no idea what this does but its awesome. I want one. Id suspect 01 tool steel or similar would last longer with the temps, but I understand aluminium is a bit easier to prototype with.
Also if you do try HHO, graphite plates are 3x more efficient than stainless at same wattage. Unless you go down the meyer route. th-cam.com/video/CuZ5WxYwl4g/w-d-xo.html
Must be your 6th sense! Stainless Steel will do much better than this prototype using aluminum which was to save on machining costs. Cherry red on the brass might indicate things are getting a bit too hot for the aluminum. This is why I pulled the 🔌 plug as I didn’t want a molten mess. British Patent 174,544 indicates to use a higher temperature around 1100F - 660F are Tesla’s own figures. He points out that his design will convert 1100F to velocity using a diverging nozzle and for that velocity to impinge on a rotor via adhesion will convert velocity of detonation shockwave into angular momentum. The valvular conduit method negates needing a second stage at all. I think the Venturi method is superior in flow if a second stage vacuum pump connected by a fluid gearbox is utilized.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre nice. I understand some of this (im not too familiar with tesla s work) but am following along with interest and have my own machine shop so may even reproduce some stuff. Do you have an online forum outside youtube?
@@johnharding2912 Hi John, building something functional is the best way to learn. I have an open source 3D printed design that has already been replicated and done over 200,000rpm which has a one inch diameter rotor. Also we have a Patreon site www.patreon.com/TeslaTurbo
There are a mix of technical and none technical Patrons, so we cater for all.
Cheers,
Paul
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre nice. I have a lot of cnc experience and machinery so will try some of this from alu. Will check out the patreon too.
And the point is? It's hot?
I'm confused by this. You have the fuel coming through the valvular conduit and the air inlet just open. The valve of pulse engines are on the air intake...I think you've made a bunson burner not a pulse jet... Isn't valvular conduit supposed to replace the reed valves or tuned pipe of other pulse jet designs allowing air (oxydiser) to come into the combustion chamber but prevent combustion pressure from escaping. Then the exhaust length is tuned so you get a pulsing cycle of ignition, exhaust, ignition exhaust.. Whereby the negative pressure pulse from the exhaust pulls fresh air into the combustion chamber where it mixes with fuel, explodes and sends another pressure pulse down the exhaust creating another negative pressure pulse pulling new air in . Pulse engines don't sound like that, they roar like an unsilnced interval combustion engine.. Which is what they are..
Bunsen burners burn fuel continuously. Whereas this engine with no moving parts does it in pulses very efficiently. Less than 250hz equals pulse jet and over 250hz is pulse detonation. The purpose of the device is to produce super heated steam at low pressure to propel a Tesla turbine. When finished it will be more efficient than any petrol engine ever could be due the the high RPMs obtainable. Even formula 1 has only reached 21,000rpm. I have reached 47,000rpm with a 5” rotor and 280,000rpm with a 28mm miniature rotor. I do need to make a video that goes into more detail about the machine granted. Just setting up in the new workshop now and firing this back up is on the cards!
The compressed air and propane are being mixed in one valvular conduit and the other side is a spring loaded hydraulic fixing that with nothing connected will be shut completely.
You should check out TH-camr iEnergySupplys videos on the subject if you want to hear a loud one. The size of the exhaust on mine is why it is quiet. Just like any engine the more fuel you consume and explode in a shorter window the louder it will be. After hours of testing the gauge on the gas bottle still reads full. The purpose of this device is to produce rapidly expanding super heated steam in an ultra efficient way. When connected to a Tesla turbine of a certain construction it will most likely get quieter. Do we want loud engines in anything other than sports cars?
The apparatus for making super heated steam is usually cumbersome, dangerous and expensive. Tesla figured a much better way. The reason it hasn’t been exploited is because few people understand what the invention is. Currently this is the only version on TH-cam that I know of projecting low pressure super heated steam. When this is combined with the turbine it will all make sense. I had hoped that someone would pick up the baton from me and run with it but as this hasn’t happened it might be me that connects this to the turbine first. Then people can see what it was actually designed for. There are a couple of TH-camrs that have connected a turbine to the device. However they have not made a water jacket / jet system that produces super heated steam to my knowledge. This is pretty critical if you have it attached to a Tesla turbine and you want decent torque from heat rather than pressure. Using a diverging nozzle converts the heat to velocity and the the turbine converts that via adhesion to mechanical rotation.
Ok, air/fuel mixed in the conduit that makes more Sense. The hz thing isn't what defines a detonation engine though. A detonation engine uses detonation of fuel instead of deflagration. Its about pressure, in lower pressures of normal engine and pulse jets you get Deflagration, which is the normal subsonic propogation of a flame. Detonation is rapid, supersonic, and more efficient propogation of a flame front that you get with more volitile fuels at higher pressure. Like hydrogen+oxygen combined under high pressure.
nice
Audio is just the unit running its drowning out what you say.
I realise and say the same stuff after it stops running. Wasn’t a planned video and my skills in filming were not too great at the time. I’ll get a decent camera and microphone as soon as I can afford it.
Efficiency 100 plus ?
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre Get ready to set the atmosphere on fire!!!!
Im sure it won't detonate outside of the resonant cavity. I think the big boys have been playing with the Schumann resonance recently... that's a much greater concern i.m.o..
I would like that thanks. I was watching a live feed that was just taken down..
Also- maybe the T.T. is supposed to run on the expansion and heat of the combusting Nitrogen instead of steam?
Doo ooh, 'Dancing magnets' scared the shit out of me. Lmao. Schuman Resonance peaked on 22/5 at 165hz before the feed got cut.
And everything is a magnet...
Imagine what you could do with 3500 low orbit stationary satellites..
I've been following your work and I think I'm understanding it. Im not hands on with this stuff like you. Your awesome. Keep up the amazing work good fellow!!
I will spend time thinking about it.
I've been following anything I could find relating to Tesla's work for 30 years now. I think in terms of frequency and resonance.
Is it possible that the conduit valve also creates the resonant frequency of Nitrogen?Is it possible that the pulse jet acts as an ignition and induces a self sustaining frequency in the valve, thus running the turbine on frequency induced Nitrogen expansion/ combustion?
I get that the Tesla notes and your work have been focusing on low pressure heat tranfers systems. Maybe the. Heart tranfer would accelerate the turbine and depressurize the Nitrogen expansion.. hmmm
for what this explain,??
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre ok thanks for
It is an engine with no moving parts that can supply a Tesla turbine or engine vast amounts of heat and low pressure super heated steam
That is one sexy looking thumb nail! Now you just have to feed it some HHO with that LPG maybe?
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre water you get water. If you add to air and burn you get nitrous oxide that burns and makes water. Add hydrogen peroxide and you get no left over water from the hydrogen and get more water from the nitrogen. Nitrogen is a bitch in its acid form, hydrogen in its acid form hell I would drink 7 litres of that a day 😉
Hell try 3% peroxide in the tank for a quick run and tell me what difference you see. 7 buck experiment if it doesn't work I will shout you the money
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre OK I am dicking around with radar absorbing materials atm. I will give it a read in my down time and see if I can get my head into it. One of my trades is aluminium anodiser and we use nitric acid it is a messy mean bitch. Any thing that can make nitrous dioxide can make huge power that and kerosene will get you to space.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre HHO make pure water. A couple of volts, some stainless steel fly screen and a liter of urine and you are making it. It burns in your motor and the exhaust is pure water h20
Quick flick through the book. Sorry but the periodic table says nitrogen is answer number seven. Although Tesla nailed some great life advice that proved that he was ahead of the times. Tea, coffee, tabacoo and other stimulates are bad for you.
Hydrogen is the answer. Crack that and ever other atom is your bitch. Hydrogen bomb 💣 just saying. 🤷♂️
Think about energy, vibration and geometry!:)
I still want one 😂
Would like to reboot this in 2022. Just got to finish the self propelled wind turbine in a box first!
wow. I can build a coil that can make more then 140kv your going to need a voltage multiplier made of diodes and capacitors and it will all have to be submerged in oil to insulate it. be careful
sorry but i do not see any super steam!!!
I can put my hand over a kettle and the steam will burn my hand. I cannot put my hand within 2 meters of the exhaust of this. If you Google "is super heated steam invisible" or "is steam invisible" you will get something like "Steam is water in the gas phase. ... Steam that is saturated or super heated is invisible; however, "steam" often refers to wet steam, the visible mist or aerosol of water droplets formed as water vapour condenses." The behavior of the device with the water jacket and water dripping into the exhaust and instantly turning to steam was quite different to how it behaved before without the water. It ran better, got much hotter and to top it off the emissions changed for the better, perhaps even good enough to run indoors. I would have to put a gas analyser on the exhaust to truly know if that it true. I have spent many years around vehicles running indoors, with extraction and without so this is something I'm very familiar with.
@@nikola.tesla.r.and.d.centre so then you can tell me what that blueish flame that i see coming out of that nozzle?
@@rchristie5401 that is LPG (Propane) being combusted in pulses that are self igniting. If the speed is made to go higher then these combustions will turn into detonations. The water literally drips into the exhaust and comes out as super heated steam. Watch the previous videos without the water addition and I can put my hand near the exhaust. With the super heated steam I couldn't put my hand within two meters. Also notice in this video the water tank bubbling at a rate of about 1 drop per second. I was using 0.5mm brass water inlet and exhaust jet into the chamber. It also heated up my workshop which was 1350 sq ft rapidly. Before adding the water it didn't do this. The amount of LPG used was minimal too. After hours of testing the gauge on the small tank still reads full.