4:50 "When the nations see the success of these people, they will wonder how and why..." These people: *living in tents in the desert, continually being conquered and enslaved*
"1 year olds can't think for themselves or make decisions related to accepting God". There is no defined age of when a child can therefore the argument is always applicable. *10 minutes later* "yea that toddler was killed because he didn't believe in God so it's justified" 🤦🏾♂️
It’s a pretty obvious and unfortunate conclusion that Christians simply can not grapple with. A factory that takes all babies and puts them in a meat grinder will easily send more souls to heaven than the church could ever hope to.
Yes. This is the question I am going to ask anybody who tries to evangelize me. How is it not the most moral thing to do, to damn ones own soul by saving as many babies from hell as you can before you die.
@@JeronimoStilton14 I agree. But sometimes your overall knowledge and vocabulary range can only take you so far. That’s why analogies work so well in at least getting someone’s head wrapped around an idea.
To this day I would like to know what they mean when they identify something as “perfect.” Not even 4 words in and they will start applying imperfect attributes/labels to these supposedly perfect things which devoids the concept of any meaning For example, according to this guy, Adam and Eve were perfect until they were corrupted. This makes no sense because truly “perfect” things would be impervious to corruption. If not, then what’s the argument for how their god cannot be corrupted as he is also attributed with perfection? If perfect doesn’t mean the same thing in both cases, then what use does the label “perfect” even have?
@@FRMurOWNopinion To give you a serious answer, which modern adherents run screaming from, is at that part of the point of the second but earlier "J" Eden myth is a "just so" story as to why humans are not gods. YHWH, who cannot find Adam in his own garden, frets when they eat of the fruit of knowledge for if they eat of the fruit of life, they will become "like us." There is no "Royal We" in Biblical Hebrew. Why humans are not gods, and the gods at the time of formation of such a myth are very human, they just do not die and can drop a mountain on you. Sort of like a king is hard to fight if you are some peasant, even if you did not vote for him! Critiques of especially YHWH's evil actions come from the assumption he was conceived of, at the time of all of those myth formations, as an "All Good All Powerful Perfect Dude" that adherents want to assume. Critics are trying to criticize this modern belief, naturally, but the answer is YHWH is like any human king.
It is also cruel and unjust to all the parents in Egypt that lost their first born because Faro’s heart was hardened by god so Faro would not give in to his demands. If you read the bible and come away with the idea that god is good then there is something wrong with you. To lay judgement on a people as a group can never be just.
If you read the earlier verses of exodus, god tells Moses his plans for the Egypt. God says, “i will harden the pharaoh’s heart so that i may lay my hand on Egypt…” before Moses even reaches the pharaoh. If this story is true, god 100% just wanted to commit mass unaliving.
The worst part that didn’t get mentioned, is that god made it so Pharaohs couldn’t let the people go if he wanted to. So it was impossible for any of the first born to not be killed. They mention how god hardened his heart every chance they get.
I remember dillahunty from videos like a decade ago, he was in this long, wow... i hadn't seen him in years but i heard some people say hes not as good as he used to be, was he like hanging up on people too much or being super woke or something @Detson404
@steventhompson399 no he didn't hang up too much and superwoke? i mean if advocating for trans people is super woke, especially when your wife is a trans woman, then sure he is 🤦🏽♀️
@@Soapy-chan Atheism still has a PR problem, being associated with western decadence. Transgenderism is a problem that only people filled with western decadence care about. Poverty and war are more important matters, not peoples feelings about their identity. The louder westerners cry about social matters the more out of touch they will seem with the world.
Adam & Eve were a "perfect creation" who went against the will of God. So if they hadn't sinned, then they would have been "more perfect". Therefore, they must have been created less than perfect. 🤔
Carpenter wizard worshipers use the term "perfect", without getting the irony, that's a comparison term, not an attribute. This is the perfect apple, makes no sense unless one is measuring it against all the other apples.
If heaven is all that matters, why did God supposedly give us life in the first place? Just to see who would reject him, even though he would already know that?
"You're assuming a lot of things there." Says the guy literally assuming that an eternity with god exists just so he can pathetically justify the countless murders people committed in the name of that god. How disgusting.
The mental gymnastics this guy shows is disturbing. Ask a religious person if they believe the universe is infinite space. They will say no. Then ask them if the believe in eternity, which is infinite time. They will say yes. Then you ask them how does one exist without the other. Watch their confused expression for a few seconds....then, you get a big cold wet fish and slap them round the face.
It is you who should be questioning your faith in modernity and it's alleged secularity. What a waste of pixels. All of this content is just picking on the low-hanging fruit of the religious world. Do you honestly believe any major religion, including Christianity, which, mind you, is majorly responsible for the liberal egalitarian societies of the present, which inspired the enlightment, and is the foundation of secular liberalism to many degrees -- is in favor of infanticide? Such absurdity. Infanticide was a common practice in the ancient world! It could be argued that Christianity was actually a major force in it's abolition -- historically speaking. Want a taste of what a truly intelligent religious mind thinks like? Read the famous biography of Russian novelist Tolstoy's 'A Confession' or Giovanni Gentile's various views of the 'New Man'.
@@Zeal_Faith_Humanity Posture all you like. We all just want some real evidence. None is ever provided to back up theist claims. I do not count opinions as evidence towards a god, no matter who gives it. Anyone that does accept mere words as evidence is not based in reality in my opinion. Throughout the whole of Mankinds history, the best evidence we have so far for the existence of a God or Gods is a dusty old book written decades after the supposed events took place, by people who thought the sun revolved around the earth. Is the bible evidence of God?....No!....well, If you're a nelly, maybe.
@FusterCluck There's your infantile mind showing again. You really can't see things beyond the need for some metaphysical revelation or unveiling? "Evidence," you say?! Hahaha! What would it look like? Not even Marxists were vulgar reductionists to that degree. I know it may seem impossible to you, but it is indeed, possible, for things to be true without having to observe a composition of atoms or particles to acknowledge it's social value. You're looking at religion from the wrong angle. Start by reading about the Jungian interpretation. Or the Maoist interpretation. Or ANY. The problem I have with liberal secularists is that they genuinely don't believe the social collective void left by the enlightenment's discontents involving the 'death of God' have not yielded the warrant for a new sort of faith or something to replace it at the precipice of the consequences of the nihilism that came forth out of the enlightenment and revolutions. I can acknowledge this, as an atheist myself. It is this simple reason I also admire religion and faith, as they are to me simply nihilism in absence at the face of the decay of current post-modernity that sees it's participants, it's nations, folks, and faiths, reduced as mere economic units to be used to the fullest extent in the name of their "god" of globalized markets and utilitarian capitalism which all religions did appropriately name the sin of usury. At the moment you are just falling prey to a circle of online grifters that feed off your religious trauma similarly to how preachers feed off the trauma of misguided youths. Ironic isn't it?
If god is perfectly just, then an eternity in heaven doesn't make up for 100-ish years on earth being wrongfully taken from someone. Those children still missed out on an entire life here on earth if god is real and really did kill them. Regardless of what comes after, regardless of how infinite the reward, it's still unjust to take someone's life. Thus god isn't just :P
Just in the context of Christianity, I don't understand how people don't get tripped up by Abraham walking and talking with god in person and god calling him a friend, and yet somehow Jesus is never brought up, nor there in person, nor alluded to.
Its all fan-fiction from top to bottom. Believers in every cult and sect trot out whatever rationalizations they deem necessary for the maintenance of their faith without regard for logic, evidence, or internal consistency.
this is pretty cool because i feel like i’m in on the ground floor. this guy is going to be on joe rogan one day. i have a friend who is very smart that is a flat earther and i can’t talk him off the cliff. but my man peterson could. i gota figure out a way to him on as a guest l.
Normally I don't like to jump in with a comment at the beginning of a video, but if "Good is literally defined as God's nature" would that mean jealousy is a virtue? "For thou shalt worship no other god: for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God" -Exodus 34:14
Sin was made up by people. The problem with sin is that it is bias toward punishment. Essentially it is an excuse to punish. Thought sins are a good example. Thinking about murder is the same as actually doing it. That is just a way to extend the crime out beyond physical action so that you can punish thought too. But there is no same extension of reward. Saving a person from drowning, is not the same as just thinking about it. When their family asks why you didn't save them. I thought about it, isn't an acceptable answer. I can't swim either would be a good answer. But no one is going to accept, well I thought about it, and that was good enough. No one is going to reward you for just thinking about doing something good that you didn't do. But they love trying to punish you for bad things you didn't do but only thought about. So why is it that thinking about murdering someone is the same as actually murdering them. But it's not the same thing to just think about going to church, instead of actually going? See the bias there?
It is you who should be questioning your faith in modernity and it's alleged secularity. What a waste of pixels. All of this content is just picking on the low-hanging fruit of the religious world. Do you honestly believe any major religion, including Christianity, which, mind you, is majorly responsible for the liberal egalitarian societies of the present, which inspired the enlightment, and is the foundation of secular liberalism to many degrees -- is in favor of infanticide? Such absurdity. Infanticide was a common practice in the ancient world! It could be argued that Christianity was actually a major force in it's abolition -- historically speaking. Want a taste of what a truly intelligent religious mind thinks like? Read the famous biography of Russian novelist Tolstoy's 'A Confession' or Giovanni Gentile's various views of the 'New Man'.
@Foxxy - Yes, I am trying to figure kut what's in your heads is all. Your group is just as idiotic as the Christian young Earthers. Blind nihilism isn't any better than blind belief.
If they can't say genocide is bad because God wills it, then how can they know anything is good or bad? How could they know God is good or evil if their morals are so clouded as to be unable to condemn gas chambers. If everything God does is good, and everything is according to God's plan which must also be good, then there is no evil, only good. It's a tangle that can only be resolved by dropping God or his followers (at least the ones who actually know their text and justify it).
It actually doesn't matter how old someone is. If they're killed before they can repent and accept Jesus, they're being denied the opportunity for salvation. And lest any idiot claim "god knew what they were going to end up doing," you're just denying free will, and there's no justice behind god's judgement anyway. So, which is it?
Bible is unique because it can pinpoint the true nature of human? 🤣 Go to the east and learn the sacred texts born through the Indus valley. You'll be in for a real shock of your life.
Why do we even listen to him, he is saying his 'god' says this that or the other... But his source for this is the Bible. We stop there, the Bible is a joke and we can ignore it.
What a waste of pixels. All of this content is just you picking on the low-hanging fruit of the religious world. Do you honestly believe any major religion, including Christianity, which, mind you, is majorly responsible for the liberal egalitarian societies of the present? Which inspired the enlightment, and is the foundation of secular liberalism to many degrees -- is in favor of infanticide? Such absurdity. Infanticide was a common practice in the ancient world! It could be argued that Christianity was actually a major force in it's abolition -- historically speaking.
Christianity was a main motivation for colonialism, slavery and genocide and religion was the motivator of monarchies which the Enlightenment sought to question
Any credible historian would argue that Protestantism played a significant role in the emergence of Enlightenment. Protestantism and it's emphasis on individual conscience and the right of individuals to interpret scripture for themselves. This emphasis on individualism and critical thinking helped to create an atmosphere of intellectual inquiry that was conducive to the development of Enlightenment thought. Protestantism played a role in the development of religious tolerance and the separation of church and state, both of which were important values for Enlightenment thinkers. Protestant heretics, often championed the idea of religious freedom and helped to pave the way for the Enlightenment's emphasis on individual rights and civil liberties. Finally, Protestantism also played a role in the development of modern science. Many of the key figures in the scientific revolution, such as Isaac Newton and Robert Boyle, were devout Protestants who saw their work as a way of uncovering the mysteries of God's creation. Their approach to science, which emphasized rigorous experimentation and observation, helped to lay the groundwork for the empirical methods that would later become central to Enlightenment thought.
@Accer one Your college professors have failed you. You do not even know this basic connection. Also, this idea that religion and science are antithetical is nonsensical and not rooted in any profound thinking. The fact is that the far-outdated 'Conflict thesis' has long been rejected by the majority of the academic consensus in the present day.
6:29 "We are capable of good"
The Bible: "Even our righteousness is as filthy rags"
4:50 "When the nations see the success of these people, they will wonder how and why..."
These people: *living in tents in the desert, continually being conquered and enslaved*
yup, it took the roman empire to actually go somewhere with it
"I refuse to admit I could be wrong. Therefore, I will rationalize everything, even the worst things,"
An omnipotent, loving god would have accomplished his goals without murdering innocents. Period.
Yeah all he'd have to do is show up
@@garyk1334 or just do his magic incantation like when he "created" the earth.
I looked up “good” in the dictionary… in like four dictionaries. None of them say “god’s nature”
When Christians say God said, we need to correct them with NO the book says. Maybe they'll start to understand circular reasoning 🤔
29:30. Pharaoh isn't even guilty in the story. God literally stole his free will and hardened his heart.
"1 year olds can't think for themselves or make decisions related to accepting God". There is no defined age of when a child can therefore the argument is always applicable.
*10 minutes later*
"yea that toddler was killed because he didn't believe in God so it's justified"
🤦🏾♂️
A worshipper of a monster is obliged to excuse monster's monstrosities.
This is weird because by his logic it’s just better to kill people before they pass the sin age threshold so they are guaranteed to go to heaven.
Yep, Christians should just advocate for child murder.
There are people who have killed there kids for this exsact reason
It’s a pretty obvious and unfortunate conclusion that Christians simply can not grapple with. A factory that takes all babies and puts them in a meat grinder will easily send more souls to heaven than the church could ever hope to.
@ticker0157 according to this caller Andrea Yates had it right.
Yes. This is the question I am going to ask anybody who tries to evangelize me. How is it not the most moral thing to do, to damn ones own soul by saving as many babies from hell as you can before you die.
26:08 i did the mermaid man EEEEEVVVIIIIIIIILLL!!!! Right before you 😂
People who can't answer a simple yes or no question drive me absolutely insane.
me too
especially when it’s something they should blatantly agree/disagree with if they don’t want to look like psychopaths
Omg. Especially when they won’t even entertain a hypothetical situation.
@@GojoStiglitz entertaining hypotheticals tends to bring you away from your canned talking points, and they are scared of walking into a trap
@@JeronimoStilton14 I agree. But sometimes your overall knowledge and vocabulary range can only take you so far. That’s why analogies work so well in at least getting someone’s head wrapped around an idea.
Odin made humanity from trees. Therefore he has the right to kill us.
When the scientist knows the Bible better than the creationists, we’re in for a good time 😂
I've noticed atheists like to claim this, but it seldom actually turns out to be the case.
We’re made in God’s image yet we are sinful. Adam and Eve were perfect yet rebelled against God. How incompetent is this God?
He did give us spray cheese.
@@DoctorX101yet more proof of his evil nature.
@@SteveLaw-UK Do you doubt the Glory of Spray Cheese?!
To this day I would like to know what they mean when they identify something as “perfect.” Not even 4 words in and they will start applying imperfect attributes/labels to these supposedly perfect things which devoids the concept of any meaning
For example, according to this guy, Adam and Eve were perfect until they were corrupted. This makes no sense because truly “perfect” things would be impervious to corruption. If not, then what’s the argument for how their god cannot be corrupted as he is also attributed with perfection?
If perfect doesn’t mean the same thing in both cases, then what use does the label “perfect” even have?
@@FRMurOWNopinion To give you a serious answer, which modern adherents run screaming from, is at that part of the point of the second but earlier "J" Eden myth is a "just so" story as to why humans are not gods. YHWH, who cannot find Adam in his own garden, frets when they eat of the fruit of knowledge for if they eat of the fruit of life, they will become "like us."
There is no "Royal We" in Biblical Hebrew.
Why humans are not gods, and the gods at the time of formation of such a myth are very human, they just do not die and can drop a mountain on you. Sort of like a king is hard to fight if you are some peasant, even if you did not vote for him!
Critiques of especially YHWH's evil actions come from the assumption he was conceived of, at the time of all of those myth formations, as an "All Good All Powerful Perfect Dude" that adherents want to assume. Critics are trying to criticize this modern belief, naturally, but the answer is YHWH is like any human king.
The question I’d ask is, if God is benevolent, why can’t he obey his own commandments?
It is also cruel and unjust to all the parents in Egypt that lost their first born because Faro’s heart was hardened by god so Faro would not give in to his demands. If you read the bible and come away with the idea that god is good then there is something wrong with you. To lay judgement on a people as a group can never be just.
if the caller's dad commits murder, it's justified for the caller to be sent to prison for that murder by the caller's own logic
If you read the earlier verses of exodus, god tells Moses his plans for the Egypt. God says, “i will harden the pharaoh’s heart so that i may lay my hand on Egypt…” before Moses even reaches the pharaoh. If this story is true, god 100% just wanted to commit mass unaliving.
Sin is a blood magic curse. Any christian who tries to say its just "evil" or "bad" is lying
Literally pronounced it gawd. Bibbleboy is probably even a pro-liffer. He’s certainly speaking with enough bloodlust to be one.
Wow, this theist should enlist in an Olympic dodgeball team!
Wow can’t believe you talked with Dinesh D’Souza! 😂
The worst part that didn’t get mentioned, is that god made it so Pharaohs couldn’t let the people go if he wanted to. So it was impossible for any of the first born to not be killed.
They mention how god hardened his heart every chance they get.
You should try and get a spot on the Athiest experience, you'd be incredible.
Now that Dillahunty is off the show it might be worth it. That guy became a joke.
I remember dillahunty from videos like a decade ago, he was in this long, wow... i hadn't seen him in years but i heard some people say hes not as good as he used to be, was he like hanging up on people too much or being super woke or something @Detson404
@steventhompson399 no he didn't hang up too much and superwoke? i mean if advocating for trans people is super woke, especially when your wife is a trans woman, then sure he is 🤦🏽♀️
@@Soapy-chan Atheism still has a PR problem, being associated with western decadence. Transgenderism is a problem that only people filled with western decadence care about. Poverty and war are more important matters, not peoples feelings about their identity. The louder westerners cry about social matters the more out of touch they will seem with the world.
I wouldn't, the atheist experience died... They went the way of, 'you can't say anything offensive.'
The Bible tells us that God is irrational.
One of your very best lives. Great job at exposing the bullshit and contradiction.
Adam & Eve were a "perfect creation" who went against the will of God. So if they hadn't sinned, then they would have been "more perfect". Therefore, they must have been created less than perfect. 🤔
Carpenter wizard worshipers use the term "perfect", without getting the irony, that's a comparison term, not an attribute.
This is the perfect apple, makes no sense unless one is measuring it against all the other apples.
If heaven is all that matters, why did God supposedly give us life in the first place? Just to see who would reject him, even though he would already know that?
it is like all these religions make no sense and are clearly man made
"You're assuming a lot of things there."
Says the guy literally assuming that an eternity with god exists just so he can pathetically justify the countless murders people committed in the name of that god. How disgusting.
It’s funny how the religious talk about “saving” ppl but can’t even save themselves from backwards, asinine logic
who would have guessed that American taxpayers are god?
The mental gymnastics this guy shows is disturbing.
Ask a religious person if they believe the universe is infinite space. They will say no. Then ask them if the believe in eternity, which is infinite time. They will say yes. Then you ask them how does one exist without the other. Watch their confused expression for a few seconds....then, you get a big cold wet fish and slap them round the face.
It is you who should be questioning your faith in modernity and it's alleged secularity. What a waste of pixels. All of this content is just picking on the low-hanging fruit of the religious world. Do you honestly believe any major religion, including Christianity, which, mind you, is majorly responsible for the liberal egalitarian societies of the present, which inspired the enlightment, and is the foundation of secular liberalism to many degrees -- is in favor of infanticide? Such absurdity. Infanticide was a common practice in the ancient world! It could be argued that Christianity was actually a major force in it's abolition -- historically speaking.
Want a taste of what a truly intelligent religious mind thinks like? Read the famous biography of Russian novelist Tolstoy's 'A Confession' or Giovanni Gentile's various views of the 'New Man'.
@@Zeal_Faith_Humanity Posture all you like. We all just want some real evidence. None is ever provided to back up theist claims. I do not count opinions as evidence towards a god, no matter who gives it. Anyone that does accept mere words as evidence is not based in reality in my opinion.
Throughout the whole of Mankinds history, the best evidence we have so far for the existence of a God or Gods is a dusty old book written decades after the supposed events took place, by people who thought the sun revolved around the earth.
Is the bible evidence of God?....No!....well, If you're a nelly, maybe.
@FusterCluck
There's your infantile mind showing again. You really can't see things beyond the need for some metaphysical revelation or unveiling? "Evidence," you say?! Hahaha! What would it look like? Not even Marxists were vulgar reductionists to that degree. I know it may seem impossible to you, but it is indeed, possible, for things to be true without having to observe a composition of atoms or particles to acknowledge it's social value. You're looking at religion from the wrong angle.
Start by reading about the Jungian interpretation. Or the Maoist interpretation. Or ANY. The problem I have with liberal secularists is that they genuinely don't believe the social collective void left by the enlightenment's discontents involving the 'death of God' have not yielded the warrant for a new sort of faith or something to replace it at the precipice of the consequences of the nihilism that came forth out of the enlightenment and revolutions. I can acknowledge this, as an atheist myself. It is this simple reason I also admire religion and faith, as they are to me simply nihilism in absence at the face of the decay of current post-modernity that sees it's participants, it's nations, folks, and faiths, reduced as mere economic units to be used to the fullest extent in the name of their "god" of globalized markets and utilitarian capitalism which all religions did appropriately name the sin of usury.
At the moment you are just falling prey to a circle of online grifters that feed off your religious trauma similarly to how preachers feed off the trauma of misguided youths. Ironic isn't it?
@@Zeal_Faith_Humanity
Religious people be like:
“Evidence,” you say?! Hahaha!
@@brandonszpot8948
- Proceeds to take my words out of context.
There are alternative views to Kant fool. Empirical data ≠ empiricism.
How do you know if god is talking to you or if you are just going mad?
If god is perfectly just, then an eternity in heaven doesn't make up for 100-ish years on earth being wrongfully taken from someone. Those children still missed out on an entire life here on earth if god is real and really did kill them. Regardless of what comes after, regardless of how infinite the reward, it's still unjust to take someone's life. Thus god isn't just :P
Just in the context of Christianity, I don't understand how people don't get tripped up by Abraham walking and talking with god in person and god calling him a friend, and yet somehow Jesus is never brought up, nor there in person, nor alluded to.
Its all fan-fiction from top to bottom. Believers in every cult and sect trot out whatever rationalizations they deem necessary for the maintenance of their faith without regard for logic, evidence, or internal consistency.
_"God is a righteous judge!"_ By what standard? It seems like God is just a tool to some deeper law.
That was painful. Host let this guy escape.
this is pretty cool because i feel like i’m in on the ground floor. this guy is going to be on joe rogan one day. i have a friend who is very smart that is a flat earther and i can’t talk him off the cliff. but my man peterson could. i gota figure out a way to him on as a guest l.
>very smart
>flat earther
I've got some bad news for ya, bud.
Normally I don't like to jump in with a comment at the beginning of a video, but if "Good is literally defined as God's nature" would that mean jealousy is a virtue?
"For thou shalt worship no other god: for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God" -Exodus 34:14
the tiny hope that these types of religious thinking slime-ball guests are trolls is wishful thinking i know..
Sin was made up by people. The problem with sin is that it is bias toward punishment. Essentially it is an excuse to punish. Thought sins are a good example. Thinking about murder is the same as actually doing it. That is just a way to extend the crime out beyond physical action so that you can punish thought too. But there is no same extension of reward. Saving a person from drowning, is not the same as just thinking about it. When their family asks why you didn't save them. I thought about it, isn't an acceptable answer. I can't swim either would be a good answer. But no one is going to accept, well I thought about it, and that was good enough. No one is going to reward you for just thinking about doing something good that you didn't do. But they love trying to punish you for bad things you didn't do but only thought about. So why is it that thinking about murdering someone is the same as actually murdering them. But it's not the same thing to just think about going to church, instead of actually going? See the bias there?
What's up with the sound can hardly hear the gusts and your loud. Got to turn the sound up and down even time some talks
Nothing wrong with the audio for me, probably your hardware
The amount of crap religious people are able to say never ceases to amaze me.
As dodgy as he was, I wouldn’t be surprised if this guy is questioning his faith right now.
It is you who should be questioning your faith in modernity and it's alleged secularity. What a waste of pixels. All of this content is just picking on the low-hanging fruit of the religious world. Do you honestly believe any major religion, including Christianity, which, mind you, is majorly responsible for the liberal egalitarian societies of the present, which inspired the enlightment, and is the foundation of secular liberalism to many degrees -- is in favor of infanticide? Such absurdity. Infanticide was a common practice in the ancient world! It could be argued that Christianity was actually a major force in it's abolition -- historically speaking.
Want a taste of what a truly intelligent religious mind thinks like? Read the famous biography of Russian novelist Tolstoy's 'A Confession' or Giovanni Gentile's various views of the 'New Man'.
@@Zeal_Faith_Humanity Off topic
@@Zeal_Faith_Humanity copying and pasting the same thing over and over isn't gonna convince anyone that these people aren't idiots
@Foxxy -
Yes, I am trying to figure kut what's in your heads is all.
Your group is just as idiotic as the Christian young Earthers. Blind nihilism isn't any better than blind belief.
@@Zeal_Faith_Humanity who said i was a nihilist?
If they can't say genocide is bad because God wills it, then how can they know anything is good or bad? How could they know God is good or evil if their morals are so clouded as to be unable to condemn gas chambers. If everything God does is good, and everything is according to God's plan which must also be good, then there is no evil, only good. It's a tangle that can only be resolved by dropping God or his followers (at least the ones who actually know their text and justify it).
It actually doesn't matter how old someone is. If they're killed before they can repent and accept Jesus, they're being denied the opportunity for salvation.
And lest any idiot claim "god knew what they were going to end up doing," you're just denying free will, and there's no justice behind god's judgement anyway.
So, which is it?
first prove god gave us free will, in fact first prove god even exists.....we are still waiting for that
@@SNORKYMEDIA I totally agree. But even if god is real, he's clearly contradictory and his omniscience would preclude free will.
Bible is unique because it can pinpoint the true nature of human? 🤣 Go to the east and learn the sacred texts born through the Indus valley. You'll be in for a real shock of your life.
Haha speak for yourself when the guest said people are drawn to being bad.
This is the worst kind of religious person. The person that can justify the worst atrocities all because "god" said it was cool.
Why do we even listen to him, he is saying his 'god' says this that or the other... But his source for this is the Bible.
We stop there, the Bible is a joke and we can ignore it.
This guy talks about the nature of god and the nature of humanity but I don’t see any difference between those things
What a waste of pixels. All of this content is just you picking on the low-hanging fruit of the religious world. Do you honestly believe any major religion, including Christianity, which, mind you, is majorly responsible for the liberal egalitarian societies of the present? Which inspired the enlightment, and is the foundation of secular liberalism to many degrees -- is in favor of infanticide? Such absurdity. Infanticide was a common practice in the ancient world! It could be argued that Christianity was actually a major force in it's abolition -- historically speaking.
Wasnt the Enlightenment about questioning religion and authority, kinda insulting to call the birth of empiricism the doing of religion
Christianity was a main motivation for colonialism, slavery and genocide and religion was the motivator of monarchies which the Enlightenment sought to question
@@accerone7545
Irrelevant to my comment
Any credible historian would argue that Protestantism played a significant role in the emergence of Enlightenment. Protestantism and it's emphasis on individual conscience and the right of individuals to interpret scripture for themselves. This emphasis on individualism and critical thinking helped to create an atmosphere of intellectual inquiry that was conducive to the development of Enlightenment thought.
Protestantism played a role in the development of religious tolerance and the separation of church and state, both of which were important values for Enlightenment thinkers. Protestant heretics, often championed the idea of religious freedom and helped to pave the way for the Enlightenment's emphasis on individual rights and civil liberties.
Finally, Protestantism also played a role in the development of modern science. Many of the key figures in the scientific revolution, such as Isaac Newton and Robert Boyle, were devout Protestants who saw their work as a way of uncovering the mysteries of God's creation. Their approach to science, which emphasized rigorous experimentation and observation, helped to lay the groundwork for the empirical methods that would later become central to Enlightenment thought.
@Accer one
Your college professors have failed you. You do not even know this basic connection. Also, this idea that religion and science are antithetical is nonsensical and not rooted in any profound thinking. The fact is that the far-outdated 'Conflict thesis' has long been rejected by the majority of the academic consensus in the present day.
Don’t forget that god hardened Pharoahs heart