Be sure to report spam if you see it, its an ongoing issue. Let us know your thoughts in the comments - are you buying a new CPU this year? moving from Intel to AMD or upgrading? let us know. And if you missed yesterday's 9900X review, it's over here: th-cam.com/video/sstkBcZdIgI/w-d-xo.html
Good content all week Leo and KG, thanks for the hard work! I am sticking with my 7800 for the time being - nothing has made me want to move yet, maybe the 9800X3D will!
I need to agree with you on this ones after digesting yesterday reviews from others. If you are not doing any rendering or compute over on Linux, then the price is not justified. If you remember well, AMD dropped their price on their x series mere weeks after the release of Zen 4 in 2022. We might see the pattern repeating itself.
I believe the 9000 series can run the RPCS3 emulator significantly better because of full AVX 512 support which the 7000 series didn't have, but someone has to confirm this with testing
9900x is the sweet spot so far, but none of these are giving you what the 3D range does - AMD need to update this range but will not do it too quickly to cannibalise sales - need to wait people !
The curve software looks like a great move forward for customers - takes all the hassle out of tuning the CPU for you. I wonder if people still tweak the CPU’s themselves, I stopped that years ago
16 core Zen 5 for £610 seems not bad to me, but I spend a lot of money on a new CPU every 2 years so I am probably the target market for this, the 9900X seems to be much cooler running however, so its tempting to upgrade my 12th Gen Intel now
Can I just put out a 'good job leo' here, after so much drama and trending nonsense to get hits, I have admired the content Level1Techs, Kitguru and Anandtech have put out. Good old values!
About time someone stood in it's corner rather than slating it. Yes, we all know it's best in productivity, but that doesn't discount it's potential in games. LOTS of people still use 1440p, so not having almost 300fps as one would with something like the 7800x3D isn't going to be a massive loss (if any). You're still going to get over 100FPS in 4K games, so what's there to complain about? You're literally getting best of both worlds.
@JynxedKoma Thank you so much for recognizing the Zen 12core variants are very good balance/value. I still currently am a proud 3900X owner since it released and even though $ drops are inevitable, on launch imo the 9900X is *only* one that has decent $ for wat ur getting perf./value wise.
9900x is the one I like the most, has plenty of cores for a variety of tasks, and hits a decent price point. This 9950x feels like a cheap threadripper to me, which in itself might target an audience!
it's interesting you are the first person to show the 9950x stock as my experience, also getting around the same score in CB23 at stock / auto but all the reviews seems to claim it getting 44.000, and 2300 in CB24, which for some reason mine just fails at, its running slower than my old 7950x and I have no idea why. everything looks fine, good temps, bios and so on, nothing looks wrong but it just doesn't perform as many reviews claim
Thanks for all the work and efforts put into this, been a busy few weeks for everyone. Waiting for intel launches soon, then 3D processors. will wait as you advised yesterday
So much click bait stuff, like linus doing ‘STOP INTELS dead’ and GN and HUB releasing so many videos just beating a dead horse the other way. Thanks Leo and thanks Wendell and thanks Anandtech
Performance has changed since this old review. Bios 1.2.0.2 did indeed alleviate the latency between cores. 3DMark bumped up by 1200 points. CB 2024 went from 2323 to 2506. And AIDA64 Extreme latency dropped from 67ms to 62ms.
What is amazing is that for gaming the 9600X is an absolute monster. Beating out newer chips with more cores. I had one for a while (gave it to my daughter) and it got to 6.02 Ghz under load with temps around the mid 70's I might wait for the X3d or the inevitable price cuts and code updates. The last gen had price cuts 8 weeks after launch.
Thankfully I have no issue waiting a long time, so the price is not that bothersome. It is very good news indeed to see efficiency *gains* from overclocking here. I only hope the 3D equivalent won't reach a $1000 tag.
The video is very detailed but I didn't understand one thing. The question of consumption and temperatures. The 7xxx generation (not 3d) had obvious issues with temperatures. Whatever heatsink you put on they were always at 95 degrees. How do these behave? If one wanted to make a workstation (particularly for blenders) how should one dissipate it and what should one expect? Above all, would it be manageable with air? Maybe with a peerless assassin?
With these prices in mind ( tax included), what would you pick for gaming, and casual 3D modeling ? 9950X = 800€, 7950X = 620€, 9900X = 560€, 7900X = 430€. I planned to have single 34"inch QHD IPS 1440p monitor, 64GB ram, and possibly pair with 4070, or 4080 GPU. ❤
Considering TR prices I think there will be a decent audience who want/need as many fast cores as they can get but don't want to spend Threadripper money if they don't need the PCIE lanes. 9900X does seem to be the sweet spot until X3D chips launch for most though.
Such a sad shame to see that the 9950X is nowhere to be seen on UK retailers here in the UK yet, Kit! Not on Ebuyer, Overclockers or Scan as of yet. It actually took a few days after launch of the previous two for any of them to even come into stock. So not quite sure if the past delay has caused shipping troubles.
I would love this 9950x but I want to wait on the new motherobards to see what board to buy for it, as I have an older platform and want to upgrade this year or early next
I am behind on cpus since they are moving so fast. I'll take a5950x for the backup machine and a 9950x for the main machine. Have solar at the house so power draw is not high on my list. Good thing these things don't cause weight gain..
Even after half of intel's CPUs started crashing and needed to be "patched"... Hate to break it to you, but AMD has much better architecture over intel... Truth hurts .. lol...
After seeing this review I really impressed about the 5950x (that I would change too) 130W of pure efficiency, nice to see AMD moving back to efficiency again, sad to see that strange performance. I really think that something is weird and probably we will see a performance uplift soon. Probably not huge, but at least to put it above the previous 7950X in any scenanario as should be. That said, grat review as always, point out the bad of it but without riding the horse of blaming/hate for more views ❤
They're not as good as they should be is the issue. They should completely stomp 14th gen and they don't. They beat it, but they don't stomp. That being said, I bet they'll last longer than 6 months unlike my 13900k.
The real winner in cpu race is arm with apple m4 as champion It has 27 percent single core improvement over m3 and beat all arm and x86 CPU in single core score!!!
7950X3D seems the best overall if you factor in the power per watt - some CPU to beat this year, when are the new 3D parts coming? has there been an official announcement yet?
I might try linux myself after seeing wendells latest video on this - thanks Leo and wendell for the good reviews without nonsense and clickbait garbage. I wish youtube wouldnt promote that crap
Im really wanting a 9950x, for non gaming performance. I do a lot of compressing and decompressing. Plus i use linux os, but im waiting on a price decrease.
Leo I hope you review Intel soon with the same passion as these, I hope intel do something, cause they look like they might fold or get bought over soon if they dont
Going with the 9950X, as you mentioned, its much cheaper than a Threadripper, and already faster than the low end Threadripper CPUs. Just because its not the fastest gaming CPU in the world, does not make it useless for gaming (some TH-cam reviewers are painting it that way).
derbauer has shown these processors are problematic but I heard leo saying there is some windows scheduling nonsense going on - AMD need to sort that out
The only thing I don’t get is the 14900k running at 253 watts but only 5GHz? It should normally be able to boost higher even with 253w. 9950x seems ok but just to pricy 50-100€ to much.
We can be confident the BIOS of our Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Master X is playing it very safe with Intel CPUs and running them slow and cool. It is quite a change from recent behaviour. Leo
@@KitGuruTech according to hardwareunboxed there is a bug in windows 11 that you gain performance for ryzen cpu's if you use the administrator profile instead of your current one, I didn't see any change but maybe worth checking it out yourself.
Be sure to report spam if you see it, its an ongoing issue. Let us know your thoughts in the comments - are you buying a new CPU this year? moving from Intel to AMD or upgrading? let us know. And if you missed yesterday's 9900X review, it's over here: th-cam.com/video/sstkBcZdIgI/w-d-xo.html
Moving from Intel 14900K due to crashes but still undecided 7950X3D or 9950X as still asking me what is more important productivity or games :/
Good content all week Leo and KG, thanks for the hard work! I am sticking with my 7800 for the time being - nothing has made me want to move yet, maybe the 9800X3D will!
Thanks, appreciate it!
Leo thanks for all the work in recent weeks - good job all round !
No worries!
@@KitGuruTech Right!
I am going to order a 9900X, thanks for the reviews, found them very mature and focused on the topics at hand
Good choice man
doing the same but i may wait for the next bios update
Thumbs up for on-point reviews!
Well said 👌🏻
I need to agree with you on this ones after digesting yesterday reviews from others. If you are not doing any rendering or compute over on Linux, then the price is not justified. If you remember well, AMD dropped their price on their x series mere weeks after the release of Zen 4 in 2022. We might see the pattern repeating itself.
Forgot about that !
Let us hope so. I wonder how long they will wait for the update on the 3D processors.
They don't really have any competition atm so it's less likely.
Its literally $50 cheaper than when the 7950X got released
I believe the 9000 series can run the RPCS3 emulator significantly better because of full AVX 512 support which the 7000 series didn't have, but someone has to confirm this with testing
Leo - well done this week and bravo for not trying trend ‘tactics’ like some others
Thanks Leo, great coverage and while I have not agreed with all of it from Kitguru, I respect your reviews and understand the points you are making
Thank you! We appreciate that
@@KitGuruTech Welcome!
Leo flying the flag high for quality journalism and old school values
9900x is the sweet spot so far, but none of these are giving you what the 3D range does - AMD need to update this range but will not do it too quickly to cannibalise sales - need to wait people !
Thanks Leo for the coverage, enjoyed all the reviews - some level headed non drama based content - refreshing !
Glad you enjoyed it
@@KitGuruTech HU and GN coverage made me go back to Anandtech.
Agree ❤❤
A lot of logic behind Leos thoughts - even if i cant always get to where he is, I admire the ethics and viewpoints
hold on for 9800X3D! wont be long coming now
its a meh w being a 8 core chip & suffers more overall against the 7950x3D
I love Zen 5, very good few weeks of reviews on selected channels like level 1techs and kitguru
Good content leo last 2 weeks, you must be shattered
7950X3D is dominating the power per watt by some distance - cant wait for the new 3D parts
Us neither!
@@KitGuruTech
The curve software looks like a great move forward for customers - takes all the hassle out of tuning the CPU for you. I wonder if people still tweak the CPU’s themselves, I stopped that years ago
Leo you have done a great job in the last two weeks creating all this content, some good reviews and details - without any dramas. thank you
Much appreciated!
always nice to see KitGuru review ;)
16 core Zen 5 for £610 seems not bad to me, but I spend a lot of money on a new CPU every 2 years so I am probably the target market for this, the 9900X seems to be much cooler running however, so its tempting to upgrade my 12th Gen Intel now
9800X3D is the one I want, if its as good as the last one with more optimisations and new AMD software support
Can I just put out a 'good job leo' here, after so much drama and trending nonsense to get hits, I have admired the content Level1Techs, Kitguru and Anandtech have put out. Good old values!
I picked up the ryzen 9 9900X for $385 USD and I couldn’t be happier. 9900X + XFX 7900 XT is a great pair
The curve optimiser is a great tool, They put some effort into creating those tools for the user which is excellent
Agreed, it delivers great results here, much better than manual overclocking
@@KitGuruTech Yes you are Right!
Intel - waiting to see what they do, their processors are always great for gaming, even if they are unpopular now with some people
I am sure Leo doesn’t get time to read comments but if you do. Just a thanks for the efforts. I use your reviews all the time for info. 🏆
I appreciate that!
This one looks hard to cool - 9900x would suit me more, but i want to see what intel do soon along with the AMD 3D chips
9950x seems like a solid CPU, its a bit overpriced based on the 9900x which seems the sweet spot for performance
About time someone stood in it's corner rather than slating it. Yes, we all know it's best in productivity, but that doesn't discount it's potential in games. LOTS of people still use 1440p, so not having almost 300fps as one would with something like the 7800x3D isn't going to be a massive loss (if any). You're still going to get over 100FPS in 4K games, so what's there to complain about? You're literally getting best of both worlds.
@@JynxedKomaexactly everyone should have the right to get a cpu that is good in both ofc not as fast as a x3d chip but still.
Its $50 cheaper than the 7950x on launch
@JynxedKoma Thank you so much for recognizing the Zen 12core variants are very good balance/value. I still currently am a proud 3900X owner since it released and even though $ drops are inevitable, on launch imo the 9900X is *only* one that has decent $ for wat ur getting perf./value wise.
Will be interesting to see how intel responds.
I'm more interested to see how their lawyers respond to the pending Class-Action lawsuit lurking
dont know if ture,but moore law is dead said 15th gen is very delayed(technical issue),maybe until end of march 2025
Thanks Kitguru - keep flying the flag for UK !
Always!
@@KitGuruTech Ya You are Right!
I dont think ive ever bought something without checking if you guys have reviewed it first, keep the videos going 🤩
We will!
9900x is the one I like the most, has plenty of cores for a variety of tasks, and hits a decent price point. This 9950x feels like a cheap threadripper to me, which in itself might target an audience!
Excellent ! Good coverage Leo last few weeks thanks 👍🏻
No problem 👍
Great test. First with Curve Optimizer that I've seen. Thanks. My 9950X is tommorow here🎉 I use it to work.
£610 is not TOO bad really by todays market but its certainly a hefty price
I guess it's all relative - if you have an RTX 4090 it may not seem so bad!
@@KitGuruTech I do have!
Great end to a work day seeing a kitguru video! 😁
Agreed !!
🍺
Drama sells - nice to see some channels dont live on clickbait
it's interesting you are the first person to show the 9950x stock as my experience, also getting around the same score in CB23 at stock / auto but all the reviews seems to claim it getting 44.000, and 2300 in CB24, which for some reason mine just fails at, its running slower than my old 7950x and I have no idea why. everything looks fine, good temps, bios and so on, nothing looks wrong but it just doesn't perform as many reviews claim
AMD should be really happy with all the content - some really good reviews
Thanks Leo ! one to watch this weekend when I get the kids to sleep and the wife drunk and quiet
Looking for a new build to replace my aging 3900x but definitely waiting to see what the 9 series 3d chips have to offer
I like liked the reviews here at at Level1Tech - old school tech reviewers just cutting through the clickbait thumbs, shocked faces and nonsense
Thanks!
@@KitGuruTech Welcome!
Thanks for all the work and efforts put into this, been a busy few weeks for everyone. Waiting for intel launches soon, then 3D processors. will wait as you advised yesterday
Fingers crossed!
I think as a threadripper alliterative on a budget this might tick some boxes for people. I dont know.
Thanks for giving me more information than I can absorb.
You reckon people who want threadripper but cant afford one would be interested in this ?
Yeah possibly, I guess it's the next best thing if you have a lot of computational work to get through
@@KitGuruTech Oh Okay!
Thanks Leo for definitive window’s reviews and Wendell for Linux.
Pleasure
I like leos reviews always on point and no Bsing around like a diva
So much click bait stuff, like linus doing ‘STOP INTELS dead’ and GN and HUB releasing so many videos just beating a dead horse the other way. Thanks Leo and thanks Wendell and thanks Anandtech
Really good stuff thanks Leo
My pleasure!
I was hoping for a more significant architectual change with Zen5 but the efficiency improvements are still impressive!!
Not sure that is worth the £150 premium over the 9900X as you say Leo
Performance has changed since this old review. Bios 1.2.0.2 did indeed alleviate the latency between cores. 3DMark bumped up by 1200 points. CB 2024 went from 2323 to 2506. And AIDA64 Extreme latency dropped from 67ms to 62ms.
I like old school coverage like Kitguru and Anandtech - i am not a fan of the drama based stuff from GN and HUB
Thanks, glad you enjoyed our review
@@KitGuruTech Welcome!
Great amount of detail thanks for this.
Glad it was helpful!
Solid processor, but very expensive for what you get
No clickbait... clear review
That curve optimiser is just magic.
I'll hang on to my z790 13900k rig a little longer and see if we get a 9950x3d version with dual ccd stacking next year.
What is amazing is that for gaming the 9600X is an absolute monster. Beating out newer chips with more cores.
I had one for a while (gave it to my daughter) and it got to 6.02 Ghz under load with temps around the mid 70's
I might wait for the X3d or the inevitable price cuts and code updates. The last gen had price cuts 8 weeks after launch.
Thankfully I have no issue waiting a long time, so the price is not that bothersome. It is very good news indeed to see efficiency *gains* from overclocking here.
I only hope the 3D equivalent won't reach a $1000 tag.
The power per watt graph was interesting, the 7950 does really well in that test
Thanks for the review and content lately, i am awaiting for Intels next range of cpus to see what they aer going to do next
More to come!
Another great review!
Glad you liked it!
The video is very detailed but I didn't understand one thing. The question of consumption and temperatures. The 7xxx generation (not 3d) had obvious issues with temperatures. Whatever heatsink you put on they were always at 95 degrees. How do these behave? If one wanted to make a workstation (particularly for blenders) how should one dissipate it and what should one expect? Above all, would it be manageable with air? Maybe with a peerless assassin?
ordered my 9950x today. will see how that goes.
Keep us posted 👍🏻
With these prices in mind ( tax included), what would you pick for gaming, and casual 3D modeling ? 9950X = 800€, 7950X = 620€, 9900X = 560€, 7900X = 430€. I planned to have single 34"inch QHD IPS 1440p monitor, 64GB ram, and possibly pair with 4070, or 4080 GPU. ❤
None.. either wait for future CPU'S that actually offer good improvements, or go with a 7000 series CPU at a great price
Considering TR prices I think there will be a decent audience who want/need as many fast cores as they can get but don't want to spend Threadripper money if they don't need the PCIE lanes. 9900X does seem to be the sweet spot until X3D chips launch for most though.
2 generations old the 5800X3D is still doing very well.
Great cpu 👍🏻
After HU and GN not missing an opportunity to trend on Zen 5 topics, it is refreshing to see an actual review.
HU and GN did make "an actual review" though.
@nathangamble125 they made click bait "reaction face."
It’s all such a snore now
I’m surprised the click bait works still. A whole lot of sheep about.
Sometimes I want a simple analysis without being drilled into some great big conspiracy. It’s tiring.
Swapping that Z790 Gigabyte board out for another mfg to retest would have been the icing on the cake. Still great job though.
Thanks, we can always aim for next time, it was just very tough with four CPU launches in a week!
Such a sad shame to see that the 9950X is nowhere to be seen on UK retailers here in the UK yet, Kit! Not on Ebuyer, Overclockers or Scan as of yet. It actually took a few days after launch of the previous two for any of them to even come into stock. So not quite sure if the past delay has caused shipping troubles.
Retail launch should be today 2pm
@@KitGuruTech thanks, cant find either ryzen 9
Ryzen 7 i quite liked contrary to the cult following from HUB and GN - but thats just me I guess !
I would love this 9950x but I want to wait on the new motherobards to see what board to buy for it, as I have an older platform and want to upgrade this year or early next
I suppose new MBs will give nothing to performance. Just a I/O ports and higher prices. I'm with X670E.
Thanks leo, you must be sick looking at graphs at this stage, I know I am lol
I am behind on cpus since they are moving so fast. I'll take a5950x for the backup machine and a 9950x for the main machine. Have solar at the house so power draw is not high on my list. Good thing these things don't cause weight gain..
I prefer Intel to AMD, always haev. always will. AMD never last long. Intel and Nvidia, hard combo to beat
Even after half of intel's CPUs started crashing and needed to be "patched"... Hate to break it to you, but AMD has much better architecture over intel... Truth hurts .. lol...
After seeing this review I really impressed about the 5950x (that I would change too) 130W of pure efficiency, nice to see AMD moving back to efficiency again, sad to see that strange performance. I really think that something is weird and probably we will see a performance uplift soon. Probably not huge, but at least to put it above the previous 7950X in any scenanario as should be. That said, grat review as always, point out the bad of it but without riding the horse of blaming/hate for more views ❤
Thanks for sharing your thoughts !
These CPUs are great, I dont care what some people say - people just love to whinge now
They're not as good as they should be is the issue. They should completely stomp 14th gen and they don't. They beat it, but they don't stomp. That being said, I bet they'll last longer than 6 months unlike my 13900k.
The real winner in cpu race is arm with apple m4 as champion
It has 27 percent single core improvement over m3 and beat all arm and x86 CPU in single core score!!!
But loose in Multicore 🤷♂️
7950X3D seems the best overall if you factor in the power per watt - some CPU to beat this year, when are the new 3D parts coming? has there been an official announcement yet?
Nothing official yet but rumours are indicating September possibly
@@KitGuruTech Fingers crossed thanks for the content Leo
My daily driver for programming/compiling/gaming is also a Ryzen 9 3950X ☺
I might try linux myself after seeing wendells latest video on this - thanks Leo and wendell for the good reviews without nonsense and clickbait garbage. I wish youtube wouldnt promote that crap
Are there any benefits to waiting for a potential Ryzen 9 with 3D cache or is the 9950X a solid investment now?
For gamers waiting for X3D is absolutely recommended!
When is Intel going to launch their next refresh?
Looks like they are on to a winner with this platform.
Im sticking with my 7950x3d right now, its still the king as far as the Ryzens go.
I’m getting it, but after a bit of time has passed, price drops a bit and more BIOS updates are released
It's pretty good; such a professional and honest review
Worth looking again at AMD after this iterative improvement.
Interesting latency issue between the two chipsets sort of makes sense why it may be the case though.
Im really wanting a 9950x, for non gaming performance. I do a lot of compressing and decompressing. Plus i use linux os, but im waiting on a price decrease.
Leo I hope you review Intel soon with the same passion as these, I hope intel do something, cause they look like they might fold or get bought over soon if they dont
Watch this space!
Going with the 9950X, as you mentioned, its much cheaper than a Threadripper, and already faster than the low end Threadripper CPUs. Just because its not the fastest gaming CPU in the world, does not make it useless for gaming (some TH-cam reviewers are painting it that way).
Threadripper's main advantage is amount of PCIe lanes compared to what's available to AM5
derbauer has shown these processors are problematic but I heard leo saying there is some windows scheduling nonsense going on - AMD need to sort that out
How can chipset drivers interfere with communications that happen on chip?
At least this channel still assumes X870E will bring improvements. Everyone else says X870E won’t make a difference as USB 4 is the only difference
Can’t really comment until we test them. 👍🏻
The memory controller is IN the CPU itself so why should it be better?
@Dr_b_ how did you confirm this when the board aren’t out yet ?
The only thing I don’t get is the 14900k running at 253 watts but only 5GHz? It should normally be able to boost higher even with 253w. 9950x seems ok but just to pricy 50-100€ to much.
We can be confident the BIOS of our Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Master X is playing it very safe with Intel CPUs and running them slow and cool. It is quite a change from recent behaviour.
Leo
@@KitGuruTech according to hardwareunboxed there is a bug in windows 11 that you gain performance for ryzen cpu's if you use the administrator profile instead of your current one, I didn't see any change but maybe worth checking it out yourself.
@@light3267 Is yet to be seen if that actually affects the higher SKU's of the 9000 series or just the lower two SKU's + 7000.
@@JynxedKoma according to hardwareunboxed impacts both zen4 and zen5 but i personally didn't see much difference yet
AMD's focus on power efficiency is a refreshing change, especially after intel's recent issues with over volting.
Sitting pretty and happy with my 5900X