This video is an insightful exploration offering a well-rounded perspective on the international intrigue surrounding this tragic event. The research and presentation make this a must-watch for anyone interested in political history and unsolved mysteries. Excellent work! and two thumps up!
This video does an excellent job of shedding light on the intriguing and complex connections. The detailed analysis and well-researched content provide a comprehensive understanding of the geopolitical implications and the historical context. Well done!
Hello! A wery good summary of Jan Stocklassas work - A conspiration by EAP and others - but you are showing the wrong Steig Larsson on photo! Best regards/ Mats
Thank you for the comment. The opinions on this differ (as many things in this complex case), according to Inge M it was not Anders B and Inge M had a clear view of the assassination. He has seen pictures of Anders B, didn’t identify him as the man who fired the gun, and has never changed his statement. If your statement is correct, that would make Anders B the murderer, which he clearly was not, but thank you for the input; it’s important that we look at all possibilities in this.
@@historywithmagnus.whatreal5708 but no other witness besides Inge M saw the killer waiting in the corner of Dekorima. Everyone saw three people walking side by side or that the killer followed Olof Palme and his wife.
@@ulfpettersson9184 What you are claiming is contrary to what many I have found has said and the findings of Swedish journalists Thomas B and Lars B at Swedish TV has found, but also to the findings of other journalists and researchers that I have read, but I would love to read your sources on this. Please let me know where I can find them.
@@historywithmagnus.whatreal5708 Actually he is correct, Just because it doesn't align with the views of two journalists doesn't make it untrue. There are problems with many of these so called private investigators as well, believe me. Regardless, the statement the previous comment made about seeing three people walking side by side is simply taken from the many witness reports along the path the Palmes walked from the cinema to the crime scene. People have given statements that there is a man in a blue jacket and hat following them, even before they crossed the street to the other side. It doesn't have a basis in a journalist's theory, it comes straight from the testimonies of the people that were there that night. I can imagine it might be a bit difficult to read these witness reports when you're a non-swedish speaker, but if I were you I would do what the swedish police didn't do in 1986 and that is to start at the crime scene and read all of the statements of the witnesses. Probably the easiest way is to head over to wpu.nu where you can find them. Read it and piece it together for yourself, I wouldn't trust any of these so called journalists and private investigators. Like in the case of author Gunnar Wall, he believes in the "meeting scenario" where Palme was supposed to meet his would be assassin for an unspecified topic that possibly was in regards to some sensitive material or scandal. This is an example of a theory that has no basis in any fact from the investigation and is simply puzzled together by circumstantial nuggets of testimonies and findings and especially the testimony of Inge M of a man waiting at the corner. However, contrary to what you believe, it is very possible that it was Anders B that he saw, as Anders himself has said that he was pacing around the sidewalk looking for his friends that had just walked away from him. The statement Inge M made about the man being there for a purpose, is something that he has added to his testimony later on while in the beginning he simply described him as waiting there.
This video is an insightful exploration offering a well-rounded perspective on the international intrigue surrounding this tragic event. The research and presentation make this a must-watch for anyone interested in political history and unsolved mysteries. Excellent work! and two thumps up!
This video does an excellent job of shedding light on the intriguing and complex connections. The detailed analysis and well-researched content provide a comprehensive understanding of the geopolitical implications and the historical context. Well done!
Hello! A wery good summary of Jan Stocklassas work - A conspiration by EAP and others - but you are showing the wrong Steig Larsson on photo! Best regards/ Mats
It's a picture from a remake of the murder. That's why some pictures are not the real Stig Larsson. Thank you for the comment.
Does anyone know of any English language books on this subject? I have the man who played with fire and blood on the snow.
Check out ole dammegård..2 books .lots of pictures. Nice prize:)
Coup d'etat in Slow Motion Vol I: The murder of Olof Palme
Volum 1 and 2 ole dammegård :)
@@Abacadabra1974much obliged.
But the man Inge M saw was most probably the witness Anders B
Thank you for the comment. The opinions on this differ (as many things in this complex case), according to Inge M it was not Anders B and Inge M had a clear view of the assassination. He has seen pictures of Anders B, didn’t identify him as the man who fired the gun, and has never changed his statement. If your statement is correct, that would make Anders B the murderer, which he clearly was not, but thank you for the input; it’s important that we look at all possibilities in this.
@@historywithmagnus.whatreal5708 but no other witness besides Inge M saw the killer waiting in the corner of Dekorima. Everyone saw three people walking side by side or that the killer followed Olof Palme and his wife.
@@ulfpettersson9184 What you are claiming is contrary to what many I have found has said and the findings of Swedish journalists Thomas B and Lars B at Swedish TV has found, but also to the findings of other journalists and researchers that I have read, but I would love to read your sources on this. Please let me know where I can find them.
@@historywithmagnus.whatreal5708 Actually he is correct, Just because it doesn't align with the views of two journalists doesn't make it untrue. There are problems with many of these so called private investigators as well, believe me.
Regardless, the statement the previous comment made about seeing three people walking side by side is simply taken from the many witness reports along the path the Palmes walked from the cinema to the crime scene. People have given statements that there is a man in a blue jacket and hat following them, even before they crossed the street to the other side. It doesn't have a basis in a journalist's theory, it comes straight from the testimonies of the people that were there that night.
I can imagine it might be a bit difficult to read these witness reports when you're a non-swedish speaker, but if I were you I would do what the swedish police didn't do in 1986 and that is to start at the crime scene and read all of the statements of the witnesses. Probably the easiest way is to head over to wpu.nu where you can find them. Read it and piece it together for yourself, I wouldn't trust any of these so called journalists and private investigators. Like in the case of author Gunnar Wall, he believes in the "meeting scenario" where Palme was supposed to meet his would be assassin for an unspecified topic that possibly was in regards to some sensitive material or scandal. This is an example of a theory that has no basis in any fact from the investigation and is simply puzzled together by circumstantial nuggets of testimonies and findings and especially the testimony of Inge M of a man waiting at the corner. However, contrary to what you believe, it is very possible that it was Anders B that he saw, as Anders himself has said that he was pacing around the sidewalk looking for his friends that had just walked away from him. The statement Inge M made about the man being there for a purpose, is something that he has added to his testimony later on while in the beginning he simply described him as waiting there.
Walter Evert Karlsson sade till en kollega så många villor spår som möjligt är det önskvärt😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮
Palmemordet th-cam.com/video/uuWHGtPx6xU/w-d-xo.htmlfeature=shared varför
🎉