Walter Russell - Proof of Concept - Conical Coils Experiment

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 143

  • @mattpresti
    @mattpresti  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Debunking the 4th (and higher) dimensional madness of scientism (Tyson, Kaku, Einstein, etc.) here - th-cam.com/video/20SW9smqqfg/w-d-xo.html

    • @LavenderLori406
      @LavenderLori406 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That was a great presentation Matt.

    • @CoincidenceTheorist
      @CoincidenceTheorist 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kneeling in degrasse is tired son. 2:00. Man he’s so lame. He always brings up the dumming loser affect.

    • @CoincidenceTheorist
      @CoincidenceTheorist 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      6:56. The earth is in fact a Globe. Aka a G-Lobe.
      7:30 The testes actually create a similar effect between the two of them at climax.
      10:45. Plasma physicist David Lapoint has achieved creating fusion.
      Primer Field series by David Lapoint. You’ll enjoy it i promise

  • @chillonfunsmart4929
    @chillonfunsmart4929 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Neil deGrasse Tyson is a spokesperson for the establishment approved scientific narrative.
    I used to really like him back in the cosmos days, but now it's clear as day that he puts his biases ahead of the scientific process.

    • @PrometheusRomeo
      @PrometheusRomeo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I literally just posted something the same. I totally agree with you I used to look up to him for science but not anymore.

    • @MadRat70
      @MadRat70 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      He is a bullshit artist from the beginning. Read his paper, its a circular argument yet he touts it as a radical new understanding.

    • @yahooserious1269
      @yahooserious1269 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He became more disappointing as i grew up out of schoolfed "education" ..

    • @checktheskies5040
      @checktheskies5040 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Gatekeeper of lies is Neil's favourite, he is not a future person.❤ We want Tesla's mind and favourably non-secret societies geniuses. As their agenda and their crumbling secrets don't help, they only let us know what they want us to believe in. Why? ❤ UK.

    • @bluemotherfish
      @bluemotherfish 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Like you said, he is a spokesperson for the "approved scientific narrative"..good to see folks asking questions.

  • @craigf2696
    @craigf2696 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

    Tyson is not a scientist, he's a celebrity.

    • @jaydenwilson9522
      @jaydenwilson9522 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Careerist.
      And a Scientific Ideologue.
      Damn paradigm protectors.

    • @LavenderLori406
      @LavenderLori406 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      He's an actor. I don't find him celebrity material

    • @FiglioBastardo
      @FiglioBastardo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not even a celebrity

    • @AfterBurner369
      @AfterBurner369 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      He's cointel pro.

    • @the_natrix9959
      @the_natrix9959 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Deepstate Bowtie.

  • @RenannRed
    @RenannRed 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    This is amazing experimental proof

  • @earthwisenaturalliving7020
    @earthwisenaturalliving7020 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Finally, Courageous Men of integrity sharing their own direct personal experience rather than ‘Vicariously’ through an outside source!! Bravo!

  • @Stefang-g9x
    @Stefang-g9x 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    This is very cool. Tesla began using conical coils after he abandoned alternating current to work with the gaseous radiant energy.

    • @paradiselost9946
      @paradiselost9946 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      and as he outlines in an article describing the evolution, he finally settled on pancake coils... which give certain advantages.
      ALL the primary flux drives the secondary, as it all must pass within the turns.
      only a small amount of secondary flux links back to the primary, as the field outside the secondary is "infinitely large"...

  • @westernfloracaravanpark59
    @westernfloracaravanpark59 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    "there is no inward pull", when you open the the fridge door, you wrap your fingers around and push from the other side, your car doesn't pull a trailer, the tow ball pushes the inside of the trailers coupling, a vacuum cleaner doesn't pull dirt in, the fan blades push atmosphere out, creating a low pressure inside and the high pressure outside pushes the dirt in, unlike poles of two magnets don't pull, they void each other to make one magnet, i understand this, i am nobody, mainstream science needs to do better, be better

    • @cad7195
      @cad7195 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      (S)ir (I)saac (N)ewtons a-pull is forbidden

    • @AckDue
      @AckDue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thanks for this. I'm trying to wrap my head around these. I followed all your examples except the last one. The pushing part of all the examples are clear. But what are the magnets doing? Can you explain more on the voiding part? I'm less than nobody

    • @westernfloracaravanpark59
      @westernfloracaravanpark59 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@AckDue 1 magnet + 1 magnet = 1 magnet, a magnet qualifies as having a north and a south "pole", its hard to explain without showing you under magnetic viewing film, but here is an extract from 'The Coulomb Law Misconception' - Scientific observers have been deceived by their senses into thinking that opposites attract each other because of seeing the north pole of one magnet “pull” toward the south pole of another magnet.
      The fact that opposite polarities void each other when thus contacted has not been considered as a factor in the matter. It is a fact, however, when two opposites are thus brought together by their seeming eagerness to contact each other, both poles cease to be. Each one has voided the other as completely as the chemical opposites sodium and chlorine void each other and leave no trace of either one after that contact.

    • @AckDue
      @AckDue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@westernfloracaravanpark59 I think I've understood the part about voiding / cancelling each other out & yet becoming one. Will look up the report you mentioned. One final question - the pushing examples that your gave - are they connected with the voiding of opposites? I can't see the link just now but perhaps it'll get clearer in future. Thanks once again.

    • @westernfloracaravanpark59
      @westernfloracaravanpark59 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@AckDue the push examples demonstrate the deception of our senses, we think we pull the fridge door open, we think the car pulls the trailer, we think the vacuum cleaner sucks, there is simply NO SUCH THING as PULL, a pull is simply a push from the other side

  • @ichigokurosaki2838
    @ichigokurosaki2838 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Terrance Howard brought me here. Almost finished Walter Russell's Universal One. This is a great experiment. I would like to see some top funding experiments with Walter's theories.

  • @delta-KaeBee
    @delta-KaeBee 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    THANK YOU MATT!!! Its great to see u posting videos, and ESPECIALLY on this device!! The work you have done, and continue to do, with regard to the Russell's but overall in general, is both exceptional & extremely necessary during the days of our current cycles (and always arguably). Of course I do not think there is necessarily a Panacea for our current human and world's issues (aside from just, Understanding, Acceptable, Tolerance, Respect, Compassion, & Reason.... but you know, thats a bit too honest or right on the mark for a lot of people), BUT i truly do believe (and have seen it work in others lives, and my own) that the content, physical materials, concepts, and of course implications, of the Russell's work IS JUST the Balm that the individual PEOPLE need that constitute what 'society' and culture actually is, and how we think and behave.
    It reaches and speaks to things much deeper than most people operate or think on a daily basis. And, by its very nature of affecting change, will inevitably ruffle many peoples feathers and worldviews in the process, especially at first, but that is part of the process of growth; shedding the old & incorrect, disserving habits and concepts.
    I look forward to IF he has any response, and if so, i cant WAIT to hear it, lol. Itd be great if they went to reproduce hoping and BELIEVING its fraudulent, and documenting/recording it. Then, they actually see the correct measurements, that it does what he claimed and, by THEIR definitions, is "anomalous" or "impossible". Then, the cat would be outta the bag, other scientists and people would hear or see it right away, and many would rush to reproduce themselves, and there would be no stopping the change that ensues from a MASSIVE amount of the public IMMEDIATELY (or relatively quickly, lol) understanding the concept and getting that it DOES work, regardless of if they really grasp WHY it works. That would be a wish come true. Really, this is already happening, tangentially, and not QUITE as 'public', but STILL very visible, as Neal Degrasse Tyson & Quackademia et al., but its regarding Malcom Bendall, his 'Thunderstorm Generator', and all the testing, experiments and documentation thats been going on in the last 6-18 months or so. If u dont know, its a combustion-engine retrofitted apparatus that is connected to the exhaust, and reduces (i believe its ALL, but if not its 85%+) hydrocarbon emissions, CO2 emissions, AND INCREASES the amount of 02 released!! Basically it puts out the 'ideal' ratio/percentage of oxygen & nitrogen gas for a person to breathe. Its quality (oxygen and nitrogen wise) was compared to that of a nice crisp mountain meadow's ratio of gases. Bob Greenyer at the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project (and channel here on YT) has been doing AMAZING tests and research on this consistently for a WHILE now (not JUST Malcom Bendalls stuff, but related work and individuals). DEFINITELTY go check those guys and their work out. And Jordan at the Alchemical Science channel, again here on YT, as he does incredibly concise and technical overviews and deep dives of the device, the concepts, principles, tests, etc., mainly for the newcoming individuals to the work, as he puts it very simply and yet still is very thorough and detailed. The last thing, before i write a book here, lol, is that the device uses 2 coaxial metal tubes, capped with a sphere on both ends, and into one sphere flows the exhaust, and its spiralled into the tube towards the opposite end; the other sphere is being injected with a cool, structured, nano-bubbled H20 gas (to keep it somewhat simple), which is spinning in the OPPOSITE way, and traveling AGAINST the direction the hot exhaust gas is flowing. And theyve found after dismantling them (theyre mainly copper pipes & spheres, but have used other metals too) after use, that the copper inside the pipes had been transmuted into MANY different elements, and its believed that THAT is what is CAUSING (well, the whole dynamic and setup and process causes the transmutation... the gas byproducts are JUST that, a byproduct or consequence of transmuting the carbon and hydrogen etc from the exhaust, with the copper, and the structured H20 gas) the FINAL output to be, basically, perfect breathable air.
    Anyway, PLEASE check that out if you havent yet. You WONT be disappointed 😄👍💯⚡🧲🌳☀
    Much love my brother & Be Well 🙏

  • @monikaschneiderstoneheaven396
    @monikaschneiderstoneheaven396 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Great to come forward and out with this ! Awesome! This Thyson guy is such a fraud. I do not trust him at all. These people are just there to make people believe that it is not possible! Thanks will share !

    • @sunsioux444
      @sunsioux444 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      NDT is a fraud and mediocre with an ego the size of mt everest due to his ridiculous undeserved celebrity status.

  • @Kangsteri
    @Kangsteri 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Interesting. The tip of the cone is higher frequency and bottom is lower frequency... So it also can be used to smooth out pulsed DC.

  • @paulomurilo2797
    @paulomurilo2797 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Great demonstration Matt! Congratulations!!!

  • @AZ-kk9lo
    @AZ-kk9lo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I ordered a few books but they're still in transit. I was wondering what the slope of the cones was. Thank you and excellent video!

    • @mattpresti
      @mattpresti  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      33°

  • @MarvelousOldWorld
    @MarvelousOldWorld 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I’m so glad you covered this, WITH proof of concept. I caught NDT claiming Walter Russell never had reproducible results, & have been stewing on it since 😅 … nice nod to round earth too. I’ve been saying I don’t believe in flat earth for the same reason I don’t believe in flat apples!

    • @Drew_Hurst
      @Drew_Hurst 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There's 2 models of plane Earth...
      one NDT et al pushes, along with it's inherent misinformation;
      and there's the rea,l and heavily censored, one.
      Not here to debate that.
      Much is deliberately hidden.
      It's not because they don't know..., it's because they do!

  • @dvlofaustin
    @dvlofaustin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Show us what would happen with the compression of 4-8 cones,

  • @Kimchi_Studios
    @Kimchi_Studios 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Ohhh, are we getting the band back together again?💪 🌀

    • @mattpresti
      @mattpresti  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      We’re on a mission from God.

  • @LavenderLori406
    @LavenderLori406 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It occurs to me Tyson is just another "good actor" like Terrence. He was picked for his position cuz he's a good bullshitter.
    How refreshing to watch the side of TRUTH prove the fake WRONG.
    Thanks for doing this on a public forum Matt!

    • @Maharodgi
      @Maharodgi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      AND thoroughly CORRUPT

  • @area46241
    @area46241 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Spheres can form in plasma fields visible or not...

  • @PrometheusRomeo
    @PrometheusRomeo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Honestly I used to really like Neil deGrasse Tyson but now he's taking his little stardom and fan base and manipulating science. I mean he's discrediting people who are actually coming up with things and I don't like that so I think Neil deGrasse Tyson just fell off of my list of people to look up to for answers.

  • @sandramendez9338
    @sandramendez9338 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    High 5 Matt yes glad you stepped up❤ I agree with you on inviting them to do this them self.
    And that your willing to help out was very cool.
    I too look forward to his personal and with his colleagues.
    Then willing to chat with you and Terrence and your colleagues.
    You already are over one million views.
    Proves the people have spoken.
    Were ready for change ❤

  • @martinmaxking
    @martinmaxking 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    QUESTION - I'll try to recreate it but have trouble with steel cones, do they have to be filled steel cones like yours or can they be empty inside like an ice cream waffle cone but from steel sheet?

    • @Drew_Hurst
      @Drew_Hurst 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think sheet would work, but deformation might be a problem, especially when winding,
      unless thick enough sheet was used. 👍

    • @martinmaxking
      @martinmaxking 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Drew_Hurst Thank, I will try to test it and will post video my YT channel

  • @paradiselost9946
    @paradiselost9946 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    rather than dump the filings back on the pile, dump them onto a tray.
    then measure the amount picked up at each end.
    i dare say the "small" number of filings around that large diameter is exactly the same amount, mass, volume, as at the small end.
    what goes in must come out...

  • @tajrad-963
    @tajrad-963 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is beautiful 💠❇️👍
    Power of one solenoid
    Or 2 just.
    Mat can u provide us exact info for regular dynamo
    Big love n respect

  • @pointzerotwo
    @pointzerotwo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Nice demonstration. As for Neil the Grass-fed Tyson, he's just an actor who started out in tv commercials like Frosted Flakes. And a big stretch as calling him an actor, because he's not even real.

  • @smellslikeupdog80
    @smellslikeupdog80 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hi matt, I'd like to get in touch with the USP.
    Specifically, you, Darren, and scott.
    I've read russell's works since I was eighteen, and made my own audiobooks of his works (in 2008-2009) when there were none available on the internet.
    Of notabe relevance to this video -- I have comments and recommendations about a bifilar quadropole if you are trying to re-create the "gas discharge experiments", not a mono-filament conic section. You need more interwinding capacitance (dielectric capacity) to interweave the blotch walls in a more forgiving fashion. Also of note, I'm not sure if any of you have seen a document -- I'm not sure ever made it to russell's archive -- that was a private exchange with lao russell after the optical-dynamo fried itself, and the project was abandoned after the second construction (the one you likely have at the museum) for a reason disclosed therein.
    The feild intersections you're trying to make between the blotch wall (dielectric) took me a decade to see -- they do not 1:1 map with just a static bar magnet -- and our science is missing the hidden inner magnetic vectors.
    I foolishly discussed russell on the internet before I understood what mis-concepts I had misunderstood. As a teenager, I've re-drawn his drawings and tables with some nuance to understand the angular relationships -- In the last year, I also have assembled the periodic table to examine common spectral lines, to try to understand how russell read their history and qualities. Also of note, is that some commonly made simple cubic combinations of opposite mates do show. And they always turn to å ceramic.
    I unfortunately have the opinion that in order to decipher russell's work, you have to understand the whole concept first -- and until the wholistic view is understood, most of his work seems difficult to apply. I think he tried to keep it that way as he was developing his own language to express the concepts he saw.
    The periodic table has a recursive element within it -- that appears to be an inert gas. You would not see it in the melendeev arrangement, because they are arranged. I am but one programmer, and I haven't been able to dedicate as much time as I would like to be able to over the last three years.
    As a student, Usually, you have to have an experience that makes you at least "try on" his concepts for size in order to examine something outside science's well catalouged domain. I think the ultimate proof that this will be, is being able to map scientific observations of crystallography and semiconductors -- to russell's periodic table, and predictively idenitfy where other effects are constructed.
    Alas, I have not been able to inter-relate the spectra to the orbital positions of the elements yet, but I have some ideas of how to do it.
    Also, I haven't figured out how to predictively use the crystallography table yet with metals. But I hope, that perhaps if I am able to speak with other students who have dedicated decades to the calling -- that we might together be able to offer each other our understanding of his work.
    Some low hanging fruit that should be acheiveable, is gas transmutation from the atmosphere (NCOU). Carbon to gold (Atomic suicide), or new conductive alloys divided from the carbon body (U1). There is a type of nanocrystalline lead sulphide and magnetite that occasionally appear in granite rock with an extraction technique dating back to the 1600's that changes copper to gold, or magnesium to tin or silver upon melting in a reducing atmosphere.
    Anyways, I have some experiments I've tried over the years, including buying a spectrometer and experimeting with sealed gas discharge tubes, that you would likely be interested in; and after some explaination of how I got here -- what I see as next steps to do next with water, carbon, and air, and rocks.
    I don't want to make a public presence again until I've been able to discuss the ideas privately, I've gone offline for the last 16 years without a trace -- after I first mis-represented russell; and I deeply regret speaking from a half understanding.
    Science and its apprentices will need more handholding to arrive at the same conclusion, and in its conclusion must be dynamic proof which they could not acheive with their understanding.
    But I am looking for a group to share with, and people to talk to who have lived russell's work. I will divulge my collection of his archived works which I posess.
    I'm 34 years old now, it's been 16 years I've been chewing this over, since I last tried.
    I think it's time to show myself and engage in discussion, at least to other students.
    I think I have run out of time to walk this path alone.
    I'm not finished with my work yet, but I hope you will understand my effort to be transparent.
    It is not only my work to withold, if I am to map currently observed effects, to the previously unforseen cause of an interwoven quadropole -- of which the blotch wall intersections are the outer cubic wave mirrors, the inner mirrors are countercancelling magnetic zeros which are only registered/stored in its dielectric capacitance.
    There are so many fields this touches, and each of the niches have developed their own specific languages and techniques, and relative scale of time to observe the effects within. I have to imagine that a better understanding of superconductivity (or dielectric reflectivity) would be sought out under high pressures for room temperature conductance.
    But because of the depth of this, I find myself needed to refer to someone who is already well versed in the domain in order to translate how the effects are constructed. I don't think I'm alone in this pursuit of translating russell. But I did think that I would finish this walk alone.
    I'm not sure why that feeling changed recently.
    So, What is a good way to contact you, Darren, and Scott?

    • @mattpresti
      @mattpresti  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Email me your contact info. mattpresti.com/contact

  • @MrThacke
    @MrThacke 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Much better seeing resonance of conical coil’s coming from a man and not a space alien channeler :)

  • @tajrad-963
    @tajrad-963 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do winding have a special effect?
    I wanna try
    If anyone can explain me
    Thank you

  • @dvlofaustin
    @dvlofaustin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So add additional cones in pairs and see what happens.

  • @toymaker3474
    @toymaker3474 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    read steinmetz

  • @agttw
    @agttw 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Provide what you said in the starting of the video

  • @MadRat70
    @MadRat70 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you take a flat metal bar and attach a north pole from a bar magnet on the bar the magnetic force creates a spiraling field. Flip the bar over and in a different spot on the bar (so they do not overlap) the north pole of the second magnet increases the strength rather than neutralizing it. The south poles suddenly weaken proportionate to the strength of the complimentary north poles. Its not a unipole but - like this video experiment - it becomes closer to one. But like he said, the forces spiral so you can never focus a true linear magnetic force.

  • @Emaname121
    @Emaname121 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Awesome, was looking for the effects of this and confirms... Confirms many things... I always believed no neutrons as well, goes against the laws of equal and opposite with a neutron... Add the neutron mass and the proton and it's veryclose to the electron, most likely the same, but it's movement throws it off for inconsistent readings between the two...

  • @creasy3528
    @creasy3528 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's interesting. I wonder what would happen if had more magnets at different angles? Would it cause the iron shear
    to rotate?

  • @mylittleelectron6606
    @mylittleelectron6606 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's nice to see you've reproduced the results of Micheal Farraday and Maxwell using good old electro-magnetic theory. But what about this Walter Russell fellow? Perhaps a demonstration that, "rings of matter are on the inside", or "centrifugal electricity". I look forward to it.

  • @paul1der
    @paul1der 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Magnets don’t emit anything, it’s the ether interacting with the setup

  • @TomCrockett-bl1gp
    @TomCrockett-bl1gp หลายเดือนก่อน

    Always turn off the recording when sirens are present. It is a negative force.

  • @martinmaxking
    @martinmaxking 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    QUESTION - how you were able to put copper wire around those steel cones without copper wire slipping off from steel cone?

    • @mattpresti
      @mattpresti  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Strips of double-sided tape…

    • @martinmaxking
      @martinmaxking 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mattpresti thank you, will try and show u my results

  • @manyfeathers9216
    @manyfeathers9216 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That was fantastic, thank you Matt. Tyson has always sounded like a lamestream puppet & hearing him talk about Walter so ignorantly he shows his true non genius colors...haha
    So is that fabulous experiment proof of a spherical earth?

  • @dvlofaustin
    @dvlofaustin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Place a small gas filled chamber in the center containing hydrogen (H2), often in the form of deuterium (D2). (The same gas used in recent plasma toroid experiments.)

  • @manicman222
    @manicman222 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With the wide end of the cone magnet having a voided core; could you not take your two cone magnets and face them in opposite directions with the wide ends facing each other and create a true void at center mass? Could this reach true zero? Also, have you ever tried three such electromagnets with the fine points facing each other as you have in your experiment but with 3 equally spaced concentrating on one center mass? Also, have you tried this experiment with polarity, ie with each magnet having opposite polarity with one another? I am just discover Walter’s work today. I am shocked to see some of my own ideas in his work. I too think all things come from one thing: light energy in spherical format closing in on itself (annihilation) and creating an outward force thru centrifugal or inertial energy. I believe polarity is created as energy moves. There is the vacated energy position and the position energy is moving towards. If there is a neutral it is the balance of energy. Can energy rest? Anyway, very excited to learn of Walter Russell. Can’t wait to dive into his works.

  • @dalenassar9152
    @dalenassar9152 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your power supply display is "very strange" WRT what you are doing and saying at the time.
    GREAT VIDEO!!

  • @ACTopo
    @ACTopo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hooo this lookin fun!!

  • @fpvangel4495
    @fpvangel4495 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is nothing to do with the shape of the world, more the reason theyre trying to hide it and how it really works, much to re-learn yet.

  • @LavenderLori406
    @LavenderLori406 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Too bad ol' Tyson couldn't be there in the lab with you

  • @nehemiahjuan950
    @nehemiahjuan950 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You think this could be used for plasmoid confinement?

  • @sunsioux444
    @sunsioux444 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Let this be a response to the good people who attended a conference at the Russell museum recently, and suggested reaching out to Neil Degrass Tyson. this is Tyson’s response which showcases his **mediocrity** and nothing better! Well done, Matt. you never give up the good fight. You are a warrior through and through! Darren too of course!

    • @TheBelrick
      @TheBelrick 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is a nigerian. Therefore not credible

  • @usman710
    @usman710 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    And i thought the magnet😅 had poles

  • @benhines6307
    @benhines6307 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    NDT is a perfect example of the Dunning-Kruger effect in action.

  • @miketierney7510
    @miketierney7510 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So what is the source of the Conical EMF force for the earth?
    I learned that our North Pole was once aligned with the star Polaris.
    If that's true, what was the South Pole aligned with??

  • @williamjeffreys2980
    @williamjeffreys2980 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NGT is missing an important point, and that is modern scientist's experiments are based on their fundamental assumptions and their models. Results that don't fit their fundamental assumptions are summarily discarded. To consider everything can be expressed in terms of potential difference (the substrate at rest versus the substrate in motion / light at varying frequencies is a bridge too far for them.

  • @James-wk1ym
    @James-wk1ym 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very nice lets goo. I think if that setup was in a sealed box filled with argon, and there were 4 opposing cones, and kv of power then that could potentially lead to fusion or at least overunity from the plasma oscillation.

  • @shapiemau2244
    @shapiemau2244 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Photographed an atom? We can't even photgraph a 'virus' clearly or an exosome, but we have a photo of an atom?

  • @TomCrockett-bl1gp
    @TomCrockett-bl1gp หลายเดือนก่อน

    We are lost. The establishment squashes the real important discoveries. Who knows for sure if time travel is possible and they already use it to transport to other galaxies and times. That Philadelphia experiment got squashed quick.

  • @sandorphoenix
    @sandorphoenix 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A sub from me.

  • @JoeBusic
    @JoeBusic 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's not proof. I'm not saying that the thesis is wrong, but the experiment doesn't prove it. Iron atoms enhance magnetic force and those iron shaving when magnetized turn into a magnet them self and attract other iron shavings. Thus they create a ball shape around a tiny linear magnetic field in that experiment.

  • @tajrad-963
    @tajrad-963 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I assume that Tetra Terreyen
    Terrance Howards LYNCHPIN
    Working on same princips
    And I love that he was guided by Walter Russell and wr family,you guys.
    When I hear Walters voice
    It's like ,or reading a book
    Or looking a picture
    It's like the fathers voice
    I've tried to reproduce some here
    But the details are important,as intention.
    My intention is pure
    I would love to be a part of W.R.I ✨

  • @R3m3mB3.r
    @R3m3mB3.r 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice

  • @Felix-tz1tk
    @Felix-tz1tk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Need to insert inside a magnetic particle water tank and test it.

  • @area46241
    @area46241 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tyson is cool Matt Presti is on to something important....

  • @action4free369
    @action4free369 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice❤

  • @allanmckone8853
    @allanmckone8853 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tyson, I mean.

  • @patrickday4206
    @patrickday4206 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An early almost mono pole magnet how have i never heard about this? Dam tesla was a genius Edison should have paid him that 50,000

  • @usman710
    @usman710 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Amazing

  • @smellslikeupdog80
    @smellslikeupdog80 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is good, but I have suggestions for how to make it better.

  • @ambertracks
    @ambertracks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    3D cymatics comes to mind and would be nice is to see what dan winters calls a fractal toroidal field in this manner , perhaps nano sized into a mist bottle sprayed into the air to land in the field. but how can this be "duplicated in nature" / naturally occurring without manipulations like an electronic machine inducing a current if this indeed already exists ?

    • @sunsioux444
      @sunsioux444 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      we live in an electric universe, so the forces that Darren and Matt are demonstrating exist in nature already.

    • @ambertracks
      @ambertracks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sunsioux444 agreed, it would just be nice to be able to have them "displayed" somehow in their natural form without the manipulation of man's inventions, , , or perhaps i am asking too much of the human 5 senses to interpret such great forces and need the assistance of devices. have you seen the movie Lucy ? in using larger percentages of her brain she could see frequencies / vibrations in their manifested forms , , , , this would be wonderful.

    • @sunsioux444
      @sunsioux444 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ambertracks you are describing the operation of the brain of someone like Walter Russell, who could see beyond the five senses, experienced 39 days of full illumination and oneness with Creator/Source and was able to bring knowledge back to humanity in the most incredible drawings featured in his books such as The Universal One. As Walter russell said, we all have ability inside of us to draw on our natural genius; Genius is self bestowed , mediocrity is self inflicted. At this stage of our evolution we need material apparatuses to demonstrate laws of nature.

    • @ambertracks
      @ambertracks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@sunsioux444 AMEN, yes, ty forgot about that and will ck out his books, cheers

    • @sunsioux444
      @sunsioux444 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ambertracks Life changing. Ask Matt Presti 🥰

  • @Jade118he
    @Jade118he 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Omg…. Our so-called intelligence has led us from seeing the obvious

    • @roxasparks
      @roxasparks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What is it im not seeing?

  • @sidster64
    @sidster64 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love this finally basic truth great

  • @roxasparks
    @roxasparks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Soo.. you built a sigle coil electro-magnet in a cone shape therfore modern science is wrong? Im not sure what ur trying to get at bro... more over i aint sure how i even got here

  • @BarronBros1822
    @BarronBros1822 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great experiment. Doesnt prove sphere earth. Nothing proves that thus far which is the only reason flat earthers exist. NOBODY wanted flat earth, except god. The plane of inertia in that field ball would be the earth plane

    • @Moment2Forever
      @Moment2Forever 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Proof and evidence is what is presented to the jury in a court room. We can skip all that an assume the shape of the earth. Let us assume the earth is flat. Now explain to us your theory. I bet your tiny brain never made it that far though.

    • @sunsioux444
      @sunsioux444 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      why did Russell state again and again that Nature uses the sphere and the cube to create?

    • @BarronBros1822
      @BarronBros1822 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@sunsioux444 because he felt like making a correct statement i guess. But that doesnt mean the earth is a sphere.

    • @sunsioux444
      @sunsioux444 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BarronBros1822 earth is spherical

    • @westernfloracaravanpark59
      @westernfloracaravanpark59 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the biblical use of earth in genesis is counterspace which would be tefnut in egyptian myth which would be gravitation in walters cosmogony
      the biblical use of heaven in genesis is space which would be shu in egyptian myth which would be radiation in walters cosmogony

  • @cryptoalchemist369
    @cryptoalchemist369 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    awesome work! this is amazing! Please come on.y #RealScience podcast!
    Also, i can get you a spot on alternative propulsion engineering conference if you're interested . please let me know how to contact you to schedule

    • @mattpresti
      @mattpresti  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      www.mattpresti.com/contact.html