CA v Robert Durst Murder Trial Day 5 - Dr Steven Safyer-CEO Of Albert Einstein Med Cntr

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 64

  • @clairemacca6941
    @clairemacca6941 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Would love it if Durst came into court one day as Dorothy Ciner.

    • @monicarusso4181
      @monicarusso4181 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂best comment ever!!!!!!!😂❤️😂❤️😂

  • @discoparty7989
    @discoparty7989 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Dr. Steven Safyer is THE BEST!
    I love this guy!
    He’s so smart and doesn’t take any sh*t…He makes DeGuerin look like a fumbling country bumpkin.
    Go Doctor Go!!!!

  • @cleew8762
    @cleew8762 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The defense attorney is so rude. I can’t believe witnesses have to endure this.

    • @dougsteel7414
      @dougsteel7414 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I honestly don't blame him. This guy can't remember what they're talking about between one sentence and the next. How he was running anything let alone 18 hospitals God only knows

    • @cleew8762
      @cleew8762 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dougsteel7414 He was in medical school at the time. The defense wants to ask him what exact word he used 40 years ago. I like that he is not willing to let the defense trap him into a yes or no answer. The defense will turn around and use that against him.

    • @dougsteel7414
      @dougsteel7414 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@cleew8762 my criticism is based on him remembering 40 seconds ago, not years

    • @dellajohnston3601
      @dellajohnston3601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      His attitude shines through on his questioning. Will go against his client if he doesn't change his tone.

    • @sativarosegold3604
      @sativarosegold3604 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cleew8762 it's not their job to see where the questions lead; it's to respond to the questions

  • @lexkaye1989
    @lexkaye1989 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Defense and Durst is so set on trashing a dead woman's reputation, shameful!

  • @TM-wk4qu
    @TM-wk4qu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I love this Judge. He is so California! And defense attorney DeGuerin awesome and totally Texan. And prosecutor Lewin is a badass.

    • @carlinetorweihe4246
      @carlinetorweihe4246 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      "LUV" used continually in US. You obviously have legal training because you are so certain.

  • @lovepet4565
    @lovepet4565 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    That is the worst homeade mask

  • @sydludwig1826
    @sydludwig1826 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I don't understand why this doctor witness is being so combative with the defense attorney. Just answer the questions and stop talking so much.

    • @DOLfirst
      @DOLfirst 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It seems he has heard some gossip or what have you and has decided that the defendant is guilty. He doesn't want to help the defense at all. I think his testimony is obviously biased. He answers differently to the same question when posed by the prosecution than he does to the defense. I hope the jury recognizes his obvious bias. His testimony is all over the place. UGH

    • @TM-wk4qu
      @TM-wk4qu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The reason this is important is Prosecutor's theory is Durst had his friend Susan Berman (the one he is on trial for shooting) call the school and pretend to be Kathy Durst to help Bob Durst cover up allegedly also killing his wife in '82. However, the day Susan called in sick pretending to be Kathy she placed the call to the Dean of the school....and State is trying to prove no med student practicing as a resident would ever call in sick directly to the Dean....they also wouldn't use cramps and diarrhea as an excuse not to come in....this is so important because the State is alleging Durst killed his friend Susan Berman because Susan knew what Bob Durst had done to Kathy and she was a loose end he had to remove as Susan lied to Bob and said the cops were wanting to question her about Kathy when they re-opened the case in 2000. Susan was squeezing Bob for hush money (he wrote her 2 25K checks I believe in an effort to keep her quiet.

    • @DOLfirst
      @DOLfirst 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TM-wk4qu the prosecution is reaching. None of these witnesses knew Kathie well enough to testify. All these supposed "close school friends" had no clue she was absent often from classes? They had lunch once with Kathie or they went to dinner once with the Durst's. They remember Robert Durst paid but they don't know ANYTHING personal about Kathie. They insist she would NEVER call in sick but had no clue she had done this many times. They didn't know she had confided in the dean and he had written her personal notes. I think she DID call in sick herself and Susan had nothing to do with it. This was just a theory posed by the DA in New York and on The Jinx. That theory is now all the prosecution in California has to grasp at in hopes that the jurors have seen The Jinx and believed that highly edited for drama "documentary". I think Robert's brother Douglas is behind Kathie's disappearance and Susan's murder...not Robert. I think Susan knew Douglas did it. I think Douglas knew Robert was going to visit Susan in California and I think Douglas framed his brother. As for the "cadaver" letter, I think Robert arrived for his announced visit and found his friend and didn't want her to be left like that but didn't want to be around because of all the publicity. The prosecution has no actual evidence at all that Robert Durst comitted the murder of Susan.

    • @KingUsyk
      @KingUsyk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@DOLfirst What an absolute reach, Robert Durst is as guilty as sin

    • @DOLfirst
      @DOLfirst 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KingUsyk he is on trial for the murder of Susan Berman here. The prosecution has no hard evidence that Durst is the one who killed Susan. They only have speculation. They are using this Kathy Durst theory that Susan called the dean to establish a motive. There is no proof that Susan called the dean no matter how many witnesses they call. Sure, Durst is a nut job imo. Perhaps he did kill his wife Kathy. Perhaps he did kill Susan 🤷🏻. But speculation and narrative don't eliminate reasonable doubt.

  • @lolly5453
    @lolly5453 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The first 25mins 🙉 wtf?! Not only did my ears die but my dog went insane

  • @KileyTheNurse
    @KileyTheNurse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This trial is a mess. That defense attorney is a toddler in a fancy suit!!

    • @DOLfirst
      @DOLfirst 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      In my opinion it's the prosecuting attorney who is immature. The defense attorney is far more experienced. This witness is SO obviously biased against the defendant.

    • @TM-wk4qu
      @TM-wk4qu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In my opinion they are both great attorneys!! They are each zealously representing their respective side. And defense attorney is one of the BEST defense attorneys money can buy... definitely not a toddler. In my opinion 😃

    • @KileyTheNurse
      @KileyTheNurse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@TM-wk4qu They keep screaming at the judge when they don’t get their way and Ponytail is constantly attacking people’s character and then back pedaling.

    • @KileyTheNurse
      @KileyTheNurse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DOLfirst The prosecutor hasn’t thrown one tantrum, the defense attorneys do every time they don’t get their way.

    • @DOLfirst
      @DOLfirst 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@KileyTheNurse I haven't seen any "tantrums" by the defense at all. I've seen legitimate objections made by the defense which are overruled by the judge and have seen the judge sustain most of the same objections for the prosecution. This judge is horrible, it seems he is not paying attention and he has scolded the prosecution and had to coach him more than once. The defense attorney is a seasoned lawyer. He does not have "tantrums" in court. If a witness refuses to answer a yes or no question the questioning attorney has the right to ask the judge to remind the witness of the rules of the court. The court can and should hold some of these witnesses in contempt for refusing to answer the questions asked. They are answering in circles trying to avoid the truth. "Did you know Kathie well?" Yes or no...simple. Did you know Kathie was absent often? Yes or no. Their memories from 40 years ago are surprisingly clear when the prosecution asks them things but when the defense asks them simple questions they "can't remember, it was 40 years ago". They don't want to answer because they know they are exaggerating the testimony that they knew Kathie well...and the tears🙄. None of these witnesses knew Kathie Durst well enough to testify. None were close friends. None knew her private life. They just want to see Robert Durst be found guilty. They watched The Jinx, which was highly edited for drama. It's so obvious that they are biased against and combative with the defense.

  • @rosannsupino5517
    @rosannsupino5517 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    As a doctor and CEO, he is a horrible speaker....Um, Um.

    • @margomalik181
      @margomalik181 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      what an ignorant comment

  • @dellajohnston3601
    @dellajohnston3601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Judge is being told how to do his job by the defence attorney. Embarrassing 😬

    • @tracywendover8104
      @tracywendover8104 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dursts lawyer is quoting texas law he defended him in texas.

  • @JS-oh7uz
    @JS-oh7uz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This witness is clearly sketchy, very strange, like he's worried of getting caught in some lies?

    • @January.
      @January. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *worried about

    • @JS-oh7uz
      @JS-oh7uz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@January. thanks

    • @dellajohnston3601
      @dellajohnston3601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Disagree. Think he's just smarter than the defence attorney and wants to show it

    • @mariahenrich9602
      @mariahenrich9602 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sketchy? No. Just refuses to be cornered by ridiculous questions.

  • @joewiley62
    @joewiley62 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How come every time I click to watch this sounds like a sonar...

  • @lesliedavis3490
    @lesliedavis3490 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I luv Sayfier he's a beast!

  • @Jo.lawler
    @Jo.lawler 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Degeurin's suits are so bad and outdated, the guy is a millionaire, he can afford better suits.

    • @sativarosegold3604
      @sativarosegold3604 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Many rich people are frugal. At his age it doesn't matter anymore to him probably

  • @mihaelapribu9370
    @mihaelapribu9370 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Poor dr. Jean Cook! 🙃... He is the Keyword in this trial. 😂😂😂 I appreciate attitude of this witness regarding these crazy questions.

  • @mal5678
    @mal5678 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel like this witness' behavior during cross did not help the prosecution at all.

  • @joyciejd9673
    @joyciejd9673 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oh, my. I his Doc is almost as awful a speaker as his wife

  • @DOLfirst
    @DOLfirst 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This witness contradicts his own testimony so often it's almost comical.

  • @lexkaye1989
    @lexkaye1989 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    part 1

  • @jennyw591
    @jennyw591 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lewin is completely unprofessional

  • @CeraMartha
    @CeraMartha 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dr S Safyer suffers from amnesia. He can’t even remember that spoke to the investigator He speaks every time when there’s no question lol

  • @JS-oh7uz
    @JS-oh7uz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Judge so unprofessional, he offers too much commentary

  • @JS-oh7uz
    @JS-oh7uz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why still wearing masks?? California is waiting for magical day of June 15,( gov newsoms brilliance🙄)