Yo wait there's actually somewhere where Scott said that the datamined stuff from AR is canon? That's actually really useful info. Could I get the link for that if anyone has it? Great video :D
Hey phantom bonnie isn’t in fnaf 3 and sire squawks (and me) believe that the phantoms are spirits so the fact that it said specifically rockstar bonnie makes sense
Another bit of info showing that the rockstars are made by Henry is Matpat's recent theory on how we can tell if Henry or Afton made them. The rockstars have the seperate jaws. It just makes sense, if Puppet is responsible for freeing the mci children, it would thematically fit that lefty and the rockstars are the same set
The wierd thing about modern FNaF theorizing is that instead of proving why their theory is correct, people mostly seem to just state reasons why the other theories have so many problems, while most of the problems themselves only exist to explain their own theory. But thankfully I feel like this period of stagnation in the FNaF theorizing community is finally starting to end, as there are people (like you), who are not afraid to think or look at the pieces of evidence from different angles. Although I'm not sure yet if I believe your theory (not saying I believe MoltenMCI), I will have to say, that it is nice to have something different to think about every once and a while.
Yeah, it's like after a theory becomes well-liked or popular enough people start treating it like canon, disregarding any other interpretation, even though looking at things from every angle is what making theories is all about. MoltenMCI is a perfect example of this, despite being a good theory, people ignore any, and all of its problems because they like it. Some goes with MatPat being weirdly adamant about someone being a robot, almost all of his SB theories include robot people, ignoring any explanations without them.
Yeah. It''s FNaF for crying out loud, there's red herrings and even plotholes in places! Sometimes buildups lead nowhere and all the clues for something go to complete waste as a different idea is made canon. The way FNaF is going, I can see where people who believe MikeVictim/MikeBot are coming from: don't just look at all the clues for the theories, also look at where exactly the plot seems to be going as a trend.
Added detail for RockstarMCI: the Rockstar animatronics all have 1 risk, while no other animatronic in Pizzeria Simulator has risk other than Ned-Bear and Lefty if you count him separately. This suggests there's something about them that is inherently dangerous.
I've been mulling this theory over and I came up with a possible modification: LEFTE MCI. What if Henry did rebuild the originals into the rockstars, but extracted all their remnant and put it into LEFTE. This solves a few issues for me. 1. It helps explain something that's always bugged me about the candy cadet stories: The person stitching 5 things into one thing is always the protagonist, not the killer. 2. It removes the 'you don't have to buy them' issue people have mentioned. 3. It works alongside the Molten DCI, meaning you have all 10 murdered kids in those two bodies. As for why he would do this, I think it would be to help lure the puppet out of hiding. After all, Charlie and the original MCI kids have a very clear affinity for one another. Anywhere they go, she will go as well, trying to put them to rest. So she would recognize their souls/remnant whatever as being in this new animatronic, let her guard down to approach it, and then it does the whole Encapsulate Fuse Transport and Extract part of it's name. Still not sure if Golden Freddy is involved in anyway, but I thought this might be a thing.
That is actually a REALLY good theory I’m ngl to you. I can get behind that. I actually did put a comment in his last video that Left could have been made of Golden Freddy parts. And Your theory works with it!
There is only 1 hole in this. And that is that the Faz-fact states that ROCKSTAR bonnie was built from the OG. This means that bonnie atleast is in Rockstar boonie and not lefty.
@@ragewireloki6213well, when they meant that Rockstar was built with og Bonnie parts, perhaps it was using one of the heads from the Backstage which has no evidence of being haunted yk?
Also, one of Rockstar Bonnie's voice lines from UCN is "So good to see you AGAIN, my truest friend, etc." so i suppose it could imply that he is in fact made from the OG Bonnie's parts....or maybe im just overthinking it and this line doesnt matter at all-
If im going that deep into it i might as well mention Rockstar Chica's line: "That'll teach ya for tryna trick this OLD bird" which doesnt make much sense if you ask me, since she comes from the newest roster of animatronics up to UCN, that being the Rockstars of course, so i guess this too can be used to back up this theory??
@@raxu8131Rockstar Chica has the southern accent, which if you tie back into MatPats Chica/Mediocre Melodies theory (and the book that he cites as evidence) would be the way the First Chica was characterised and thus the oldest Chica
@@ystacalden No, i get the accent, i was pointing out the fact that she calls herself, quote "an Old bird" implying that she has been around for a long time which would make sense if the Rockstars are actually made from parts of the OG animatronics
Sister Location being Parallel is a perfect way to frame where that game fits in the story. I think the name choice was very intentional, on multiple levels; it's a "sister" or something along side other events, other places, other games. It does not have it's own unique spot in the timeline made for it; it's concurrent with other things happening. It's title isn't even a numbered entry of the series; I would argue that Sister Location and FNAF World not sharing naming conventions is suppose to be a huge tell in how they relate to all of the other games in the "mainline series". This continues to fit in with how a lot of the mysteries in FNAF seem to be written and presented; there are very intentional reasons behind whenever something breaks a convention; that's a clear "tell" that you should pick out that detail and consider it a direct indication of something important worth understanding.
I agree. Sister location was likely operating alongside the restaurants. This let them make more money hosting parties at people's homes instead of buying new premises in that market. A new location requires buildout, marketing, developing a local customer base... the rental service is a much better way to enter a new area and convert the guests of that party to brand loyal customers. I'd say the TV shows and other nationally available merchandise would come after they became even bigger. It is really hard to judge how long certain things were in use/popular. All the buildings look run down during gameplay, well after their hayday, but the stories of the kids' deaths are all during the bright, happy height of Fazbear popularity. Each time a rash of disappearances or deaths happened there was a dip, first for one location and later for the brand, and then it comes back in a revival of the brand.
Pizza Sim is also unnumbered, when it's pretty clearly set shortly after FNAF 3 and before UCN/VR/AR/SB, aka with a unique spot and not concurrent with any other games. The connections to the "sister" in the name are nice, but I'm not convinced those are intentional lore pieces, when the "sister" part of the name has other explanations (namely, Baby). Still easily could be true, but I wanted to point that out.
0:04 I want to say something in favor of this theory regarding the purchase of the rockstars, while the rockstars arent necessary to be purchased to get the true ending there are drawings of the rockstars in the office which implies someone (I guess kids since its usually kid's drawings in FNAF's offices) have seen the rockstars. They're also kind of the face of the game in the menu And if anyone was to wonder why they dont attack like Lefty, Molten and the others, well maybe they're parts were took back from the FNAF 3 fire and didnt have much remnant left or theres need for an external force (The Puppet) to make them come to life, either way this could also refer to Henry wondering if the souls are aware This comment became longer then i originally planned lol, anyway good video 👍
2:37 I don’t think Possessed is the right word, but moreso the funtimes contain souls rather than said souls controlling the robots, I think there’s a differences. I feel William wouldn’t be stupid enough to make sure that the robots that he created to explicitly kill kids don’t have said kids controlling his robots, to kill him, I think this is confirmed with Baby explicitly being baby in all of her dialogue (You can argue that “I will make you proud Daddy” is Elizabeth, but even then most of the Dialogue shows that it’s baby talking not her.) But you do bring up a good point of Baby (Not Elizabeth, Baby herself) being a twisted mirror of Charlie, like that’s something I never would’ve thought about before you said it.
But how would he make sure that the robots didn't get the souls? Stuffed, touched, alive, dead, if there is a human near an animatronic they WILL posses it when that last breath is taken. Balora and Funtime Foxy can't even kill yet they are also possessed...no one talks about that. Heck, GlamMike is off the basis that Freddy went down into the pit (we don't know how far down, but let's say it was where the voice line triggers) and POSSIBLY got possessed there. I dont think William Afton can control that, nor make sure it doesn't take place.
@@quesproductions7170 I’m not saying that they lack souls (Elizabeth is proof enough) but they can’t control the suits actions, again there’s a difference.
id’s fantasy glam rock Freddy video brings up a point that even if an animatronic is possessed doesn’t mean it has full control the programming can still control the animatronic and even warp the personality of the soul inside it
You can also argue that Elizabeth is controlling Baby but she's bonded with the code and doesn't remember her life before. Remember most other spirits are very animalistic so it's not crazy to say Elizabeth simply doesn't have full consciousness
@@BrendenTait8858 I would say that.. if Baby didn’t spell out her entire backstory with it only being through her perspective and no specific mention of Elizabeth outside of her being just another girl.
Maybe the cupcake fact implies that fazbear can make specialized endoskeletons, like how BB is smaller that the common animatronic or how the Puppet moves so fluidly in VR, actually TH-camrs MidoryArts and GesternAbe from the Hispanic community both gave a try to explaining how it could work (the Puppet I mean)
i also think RockstarMCI helps explain why Lefty is styled after the Rockstars. Henry could have created them as, like, prototype Lefties and then used the possessed parts from the Classics to make sure the "containment" part worked instead of sending all of them out to find Charlie and try to capture her
I honestly believe Rockstar MCI, it to me at least makes more sense and if the rockstars do have parts of the fnaf 1 animatronics in them it would explain why the fazbear fright team couldnt just put the fnaf 1 animatronics back together because they are just shells, henry couldve taken the endos after sealing afton away and made the rockstars with those endos
I think there’s a new wave of FNAF theorists emerging now, that being you, RyeToast, ID’s Fantasy and FuhNaff. Y’all are really helping to push theorising for this series forward, good job
I thought that fnaf theorists were being dramatic when talking about how aggressive their comment section is. Then I made a small comment on twitter about how Mangle could be a disassembled version of Funtime Foxy (MISTAKE) Personally, you've convinced me with Rockstar MCI. I feel like the biggest issue I've had with every theory is the idea of soul-splitting, that's SO narratively unsatisfying. Gonna make a timeline video, and your takes on more popular theories are super helpful. I can't believe your channel doesn't have more subs, great videos dude, keep it up :)
Something you might find interesting is that it’s been said that in long since deleted Illumix Livestreams, Illumix, not Scott, wrote the Faz-Facts themselves.
Your other video was already good but hearing you expand upon it in this one is amazing. I can't properly explain just how happy I am to see people actually creating their own theories and looking at stuff differently because there's so much people take as canon when we really don't have all that much info and things could really be taken differently. It felt like fnaf was in such a stagnant place where there was just one theory for so long and that was it so I'm so glad to see new theories not just for the current games but for old stuff too because I really love the older games and enjoy seeing new theories about them
After the events of the FNAF3 minigames the saferooms are sealed and a tape is made about them being sealed. The restaurant has to be operational at that point, otherwise there would be no need to make the tape. But if the pizzeria is operational, then all the minigames have to happen in one night, otherwise someone would have discovered the dismantled animatronics. If all of them happen in one night, then there is no time for William to take the parts, melt them down and inject them into the funtimes. So molten MCI makes no sense. Molten DCI gives William a reason to go to the pizzeria: he needs more remnant. I like Rockstar MCI. It's more believable then molten MCI. Obviously it has its issues. Another one is the rusted Foxy torso in SB. Side note: a lot of theories say that Henry (or sometimes William) opens the FNAF2 location, but in FNAF2 we hear "Uh, we're gonna try to contact the original restaurant owner. Uh, I think the name of the place was... 'Fredbear's Family Diner' or something like that. It was closed for years, though, I doubt we'll be able to track anybody down.".
@@Jedi-ge6lrfrom what is said in fnaf 1 last news paper, the location closed in the end of the year 1993 because the tragedy that took the same place in 1985 still curses the location in 1993
Honestly I like this theory it’s a nice and clean explanation (something that is always welcome in fnaf theory’s) it also fixes one big issue I have with molten mci which is why even do the rental service if the funtimes already have the mci spirits in them and about what happened to golden Freddy I feel Henry just made lefty with golden Freddy’s parts and having 3 powerful spirits just made it go berserk and that’s why It’s dangerous it also makes the whole Afton family be there to be burned William ballora as a representation of mrs Afton Elizabeth crying child and mike Also legally it makes sense that henry made the rockstars cuz he owns their copyright
One mini theory from awhile back that I'm not going to get into detail with right now (maybe at some point in the future) is that Funtime Foxy has a decent chance of being the voice of ‘Circus Baby’ in night 4 of FNaF SL. It has some interesting implications to it.
the thing about henry keeping the rockstars off screen makes more sense if instead of that he kept the parts of the fnaf 1 animatronics somewhere to reuse them to build the rockstars, something like how the withereds are kept in the fnaf 2 location
I believe in MoltenMCI and "RockstarDCI". For me at least, I think it makes sense that the MCI kids possess the endoskeletons because they were inside the suits, while the DCI kids possess the suits, because their bodies were outside the animatronics. Then after FNAF 1 William takes the endoskeletons from the originals and puts the remnant into the funtimes, I guess Henry would come back to seal the safe room and take the suits and then with those parts and whatever is left from the FNAF 3 fire he makes the Rockstars. It has its flaws, but I think it's at least an interesting concept.
Here's a thought about the RockstarMCI, or at least, Rockstars being important to FFPS; why would *they* be the animatronics chosen for the menu screen then if they aren't semi-imprtant at least? Couldn't Scott have used the generic Faz Ent. logo? Or the logo that has the Freddy pointing towards the viewer (yknow, the fnaf withered Freddy lookin' one) ?? Or even Lefty or Helpy?? Just a thought I had watching the previous video
Matpat needs to have you in his fnaf talkback, you'll definitely make the theories more interesting, you and ryetoast both deserve a spot in his talkback
Tangental but Man do I hate that Scott just said data mined and unreleased stuff was canon. I feel like they should have been at least. been published in the encyclopedia or even on his website. Good video, I'm not sure if I'm convinced on Rock-Star MCI, but I'm also less sure on Molten MCI and Molten DCI. All of them have their issues.
The only actual reason people try to defend Molten MCI with "Afton must have gathered the parts of the animatronics off screen" is because they confuse it with Funtimes MCI. These two are not the same, and one does not necessarily need to be true for the other.
That outtake at the end had me cracking up! I ALWAYS enjoy hearing outtakes like that! Hearing you say “Despite the name hurricanes are not the leading cause of children” was HILARIOUS!
i have also theorised that the toy animatronics were also possesed and were the ones melted down to become the funtimes/molten freddy which solves 3 major plot holes 1. what happened to the toys after fnaf 2 (other then having their heads removed for fnaf 3) 2. what happened to the extra bodies (in the fnaf 2 mini game save them we play as Freddy but if you look around you can just see 5 dead kids which are NOT the classic (withered) animatronics due to the fact that the missing kids kids would already be in the animatronics due to William stuffing them in the suits and the toys being on stage) 3. why the toy animatronics go berzerk after night 3 but before night 4 as thats when william killed the DKI (the dead kids incident because the bodies are just out in the open so they aren't "missing") which this is also likely the case due to the fact that the original MCI kids moved on after fnaf 3 (except golden freddy) due to the events of the secret minigames and fnaf world clock ending (which is just the fnaf 3 mini games just done in the MCI/DKI/puppet/gold/bite victim perspective) but if the DKI was melted down into molten freddy then what explains the rockstar animatronics (mainly the bonnie evidence you pointed out), simple the toy animatronics were made using possessed parts of the classic animatonics which parts of the toys were used in the refurbished (fnaf 1) animatronics (explaining their more erratic behavours with foxy running at a bajillion miles and hour and bonnie seemingly just teleporting) and the other parts melted down in secret to create the funtimes which splits the reminant between fnaf 1s refurbished animatronics (where the MCI and DKI are combined) the fun times (with the melted down parts) and the remaining parts (if there is any) seemingly scrapped or put into the rockstars years later (they use fnaf 1 endos so that wont surprise me)
I really like the Rockstar MCI theory. Even if they are only partial souls, and the other part of the souls was in the Toys who became/were injected into the Funtimes, it still explains what happened to the haunted parts we saw in the first game's animatronics and how they end up on site in Pizzeria Simulator. Great video!
Despite the name Hurricanes are not the leading cause of childre- * proceeds to die of laughter * I need more funny Sire Squawks outtakes like this one
"No matter how many times they burn us" I believe that this is Cassidy just-- Speaking for the other spriits while they aren't there to speak for themselves.
Stormister made a really good video that explains how Golden Freddy was burned in the the FNaF6 ending. Afton wanted to rip parts off of himself in the Spring Bonnie suit because of how susceptible it was to following children wherever heard like in FNaF3. The theory is that Afton found the Golden Freddy suit & ripped parts off of it to make a new suit, hence why his head looks so disproportionate & he actually has suited feet. That is how Cassidy is able to tie their soul to William, they are part of the same suit & therefore they were both burned leading quite nicely into UCN.
4:55 I feel this is not golden Freddy saying they have been burned multiple times but rather now that their soul is tied to Afton no matter how many times Afton burns Cassidy won’t let him pass on
Nice video squawks, it was interesting, because before I didn't actually put together the concept of RockstarMCI, before I mostly thought the Rockstar Bonnie fact was suggesting Withered Bonnie's appearance resembled Rockstar Bonnie, most likely in his face, which of course he doesn't have.
DCI is something. Why have two sets of murdered children in a story, unless you need two sets? I write, a lot, and one of the many aspects of fiction most writers will tell you is that any plot point that can be used to solve/cause multiple aspects of a story is always important to use, instead of creating multiple new but highly similar events. In the real world, there are redundant events that occur all the time, but in writing it's highly suggested to be avoided, because everything being too coincidental is seen as less annoying to readers then making them keep track of multiple, similar but not the same events. MCI is first, DCI is second. I think one way to solve them is to ask what MCI does not cover, thus legitimizing the need for DCI to have happened. I am not arguing Scott is a writing genius; these techniques/choices in writing are things you quickly discover while telling a third party your story. So how can we divide up the events in the game to show it would be useful for two events in which several children are yeeted at the same time? One hint I think is important to consider is the implied visual that DCI is an open crime scene. The killer in DCI does not care about keeping a secret anymore, where as MCI may imply the killer in that situation wants to conceal it. The acronyms kinda cover this; MCI is about "missing" children never found, DCI is about kids that clearly had never been missing. Perhaps one way to figure it out is to identify when William might have "run out" of "material" and would be in need of collecting more? Is there a point in the timeline where we can't say there is "unused" remnant vs. when it's all accounted for?
If we were to put Sister Location before the 2 game (maybe by literal days) then DCI would be because William has no more Remnant as it was injected into Michael when he got Scooped, then he (Michael as Fritz) arrives just when the dayshift position (possibly William with an alias) get available just late of finding his father
@@gray1013 MCI = Missing Children Incident. The incident described in the FNAF 1 newspapers about 5 missing children who lured to the back room by William Afton in a mascot costume and killed. These kids would go on to possess Freddy, Foxy, Bonnie, and Chica and Golden Freddy. DCI = Dead Children Incident. This incident is shown in FNAF 2's SAVE THEM minigame where we see at least 5 dead kids scattered around the FNAF 2's location also killed Afton. These kids are assumedly not the same as the MCI kids because the OGs are already possessed by the time this minigame takes place. It is believes that these kids go on to possess the Toy Animatronics. Hope this helps. Hope this helps.
Thank you! I definitely think at this point it’s too late to bring the fnaf 2 dead kids back into the series, and it’s especially pointless after Fnaf 6.
Something I think could be used by both sides (those that believe in RockstMCI, and those who don't) is that yeah, the Rockstars aren't required for getting the true ending, but we don't know what animatronics Michael bought. We know some of the things he bought thanks to SB, but we don't know all the animatronics he bought.
I believe that canonically, michael did buy the rockstars, or its possible the rockstars were already at the location from the start, since we literally see children's drawings of the rockstar animatronics in the fnaf 6 office.
It's always good to have different perspectives on things to help look back and critically think about theories from the past. Even though I'm not sold on this theory there is solid evidence. Just goes to show how messed up the lore is currently.
We never really know how many kids died. Sure, we know five spirits hung around and possessed the OG restaurant, but not every dead kid has to become a ghost! The fun times are designed to kill kids on the daily, and then get scooped out and experimented with. So much of this story is just someone's interpretation of some symbolism.
Just had a thought revisiting this video for research. I don't know how Henry would be privy to this information, but under Roctstar MCI, the may not need to be present in the FNAF 6 fire because happiest day is what frees them, not William's death. It may even be possible that happiest day occured after fnaf 3, in which case Cassidy may have pulled an Andrew and attached to William until Fnaf 6. To continue the line of thought, Henry may even have been aware that they were freed, and decided to not to make them mandatory for the true ending. There's some useful pieces here, I'm just not sure how they fit together yet.
Great video. I think I’m sold. If we leave the toys out of it (I also thought of moltenToyMCI) then it makes perfect sense. If MoltenToyMCI is true, then sister location would be after fnaf 2, which kinda makes it silly for the funtimes being made to capture children if they’re already made from souls…Like what’s the point. Also Elizabeth would have to had died after fnaf or during fnaf 2. Which seems way to late. My guess is it’s just the kids the fun times captured. OR. Baby was made much earlier, but then who else would be with her at circus baby’s pizza world then, ya know?
Molten mci also doesnt make sense with the follow me minigame unless ol willy is taking abart one animatronic a night for some reason. I dont think hes going anywhere (for 30 years) after getting springlocked and wouldnt have a chance to take parts or remnant back to the funtimes :V
10:40 I am a MoltenMCI2 believer, and I also am a RockstarMCI believer. Perhaps due to gaslighting from William, and people believing Michael was crazy about the “rumours,” perhaps the DCI was to motivate him into trying to find out what was going on under the alias of Fritz Smith, and him tampering with the animatronics due to William’s gaslighting and his curiosity based on what he heard, they come to life at night, “rumours.” This makes the DCI actually relevant, and have a FORM of MoltenMCI; er- MoltenMCI2 AND RockstarMCI both work, and both make somewhat sense!
when he said "he lured them back with familiar tricks" is a reference to when Willam uses a shadow Freddy suit to lure the classics near the safe room to then dismantle them
I dont think shadow freddy is a physical suit. Shadow freddy is a spectre created from the agony of william's actions and the horrors that occurred in the fazbear franchise. I think william used the spring bonnie suit in follow me, but the animatronics seeing William as shadow freddy is meant to be symbolic
MoltenMCI and RockstarMCI could both coexist. Ppl forget there was a 2nd MCI in 1987 and we never saw the toy animatronics again past 1987 (only their outer shells in FNAF3 without their endoskeletons)
Ok ill be honest ive never thought of the MCI kids in fnaf 6 like this and it honestly fits perfectly with the way the game seems to treat the whole "Bringing them all together in one place" thing, also I love the idea of GF always following the aftons like in spirit it makes more sense if you think about it
great video ! my only problem with rockstar mci is that if there made after fnaf 3 fire what remnant would be in them (i believe dci kids are in molten freddy)
By pure coincidence the other day I also had a bit of a headache over the Vengeful spirit line "No matter how many time they burn us." Because that implies both TOYSNHK has been burned multiple times which is really weird if they're not in molten Freddy, it's pretty weird even if it is given the whole "No matter how many times" thing, but fnaf theorizing is basically just alchemy themed poetry analysis and as such there's always alternate metaphorical interpretations What I would go with is when Cassidy or whoever says "Us" they're referring to all the haunted children robot suits, the toy animatronics and the classics were in the middle of the fnaf 3 fire and a bunch of ghost things were in fnaf 6 so it would add up, plus the phantoms appearing burnt could imply even more fires but who knows, "us" doesn't fundamentally mean Golden Freddy is referring to just themselves and William, us is a very vague word. Michael and Henry both tried to release William and a pile of kids souls, "They burn us". plus they use the pronoun "they" which mean they're probably either talking about multiple people or some general thing that doesn't refer to anything in particular like when people say "No matter how many times *they* knock me down I get back up", I'd lean towards the former Furthermore "They burn us" could just mean a general term for death or suffering in general as fnaf 6 and 3 were supposed to be the death of the entire series and they both end in fire, like no matter what William goes through they'll be there preventing it from ever ending. but that's looser and kinda drops the "they" so idk also you weren't sure how golden Freddy got to fnaf 6 location, they might've just used some soul whatever to tortures William from a distance, but fnaf 1 and midnight motorist both kinda sorta maybe imply from a certain point that Golden Freddy can straight up teleport so there's that, that's the explanation I went with
1:35 because he is still figuring out how it works. His end goal with remnant is to live forever. He doesn't have a practical way to test that yet. Hence the Funtimes.
About the whole Hurricane thing… I know the trilogy is an alternate timeline, but it does mention multiple times that it’s set in Hurricane, Utah. So Special Delivery technically isn’t the first source to state that FNAF is set in Hurricane.
1. The problem is, if Henry had the rockstars in the pizzeria we wouldn't have to buy them. 2. No one said the funtimes were made to get remnant JUST FOR THEM. They can also gather it for William. Why would they have that design in the first place if it would only serve to be used 1 time? Because it is not just for them. But either way, what other explanation is there to explain the fact that the souls are literally being used? 3. Well, no. Henry didn't specify if they were still trapped in the prisons of his making. He said "souls trapped" and that can be used to say "souls that were trapped" not necessarily "are". And again, he later says they are NOW being set to new purpose and used in ways he can't imagine. How could they still be in HIS machines if they are being used? 4. Just remember: "being USED in ways he never thought imaginable" 5. I disagree that the funtimes having random kids' souls is a better narrative than them having the MCI souls. Them having the MCI (+CC) souls literally makes all of the important characters of the lore being in 1 place in fnaf 6. All of them. 6. The phrase "how many times they burn us" in my opinion doesn't necessarily imply Cassidy has been burned multiple times, but sure, if we count, it would be: their souls in Mike in fnaf 3's fire, then fnaf 6, and also when their soul was melted down with the others to inject them into the funtimes. That's enough times. 7. Yes, it IS weird phrasing but still, "developed from" can STILL be talking about the design, it's true they could have straight up said "inspired from the design" but that same way they could have said "made out of". 8. MoltenDCI is a better way to explain it, but I believe it's just the same as MoltenMCI. It really only changes the exact way the souls were melted, but still, all of the evidence works the same way. 9. But I do believe that RockstarMCI makes less sense than MoltenMCI.
I have an explanation for the Golden Freddy in the fires thing I believe that the Crying Child was the fifth soul inside of Molten Freddy, and that Cassidy was attached to William after "Follow Me." BV was in Molten Freddy, Cassidy/Vengeful Spirit was not. That's what I believe.
4:58 definitely going off on a limb here but, maybe Golden Freddy can take on the form of the Purple Freddy from the follow me minigames? it would explain why the Purple Freddy wants the other 4 to follow him to the safe room to be dismantled and allow them to gang up on William (of course assuming he somehow knew this would happen) and could explain what he meant by this as Shadow Freddy CAN appear in the FNAF 3 office and assumingly would be burned with the rest of the Fazbear's Fright. That and the fact that I don't think Golden Freddy has physically existed since he was Withered (I doubt while remaking the FNAF 1 gang they'd remake Golden freddy too but idk you never know) and was probably scrapped along with the toys, (if that suit ever even existed too lol) so it wouldn't be too far of stretch to think that (especially since in Golden Freddy's case there wasn't anything for William to dismantle) once the others were destroyed he decides to change from the Purple or Shadow Freddy form to take on the form of a dead ghost kid to match the others and lead the charge scaring Will and then reappear as shadow/purple freddy in the FNAF 3 location 30 years later as his angry soul is still attached to William. (that of course kinda pokes a hole in my theory, as why would an entirely non physical entity care about being burned but idk I'm a bit rusty on the lore and I'm kinda just spitballing at this point lol.)
This video inspired me to consider RyeToast's Molten DCI theory (th-cam.com/video/TGiRKuVHp-E/w-d-xo.html) in combination with FuhNaff's new Mike Villain theory (th-cam.com/video/7v-MW_g-2Iw/w-d-xo.html). With these interpretations combined, we find William and Michael both regretting their poor choices that led to the deaths of family members (Elizabeth for William, Crying Child for Michael). Instead of growing apart, they bond over the promise to put their family back together. As in RyeToast's theory, Michael comes in at the end of FNAF 2 to claim the DCI endoskeletons for remnant. He and William use this remnant with the Funtimes to experiment, learning enough about the substance to feel confident in an attempt to bring their family back. However, while they have Elizabeth's remnant they still need to get the Crying Child back. So, Michael goes to the FNAF 1 locations and tampers with the animatronics, programming them to do the "Follow Me" minigame so that William can disassemble them. Unfortunately this frees the spirits, and he gets springtrapped. As in your video it's actually Henry who takes the endoskeletons, which he studies in order to understand remnant for the FNAF 6 Insanity ending. You could say he takes them for Rockstar MCI, but despite the weird Faz Fact I'm not totally on board with that theory. Regardless, Michael is now at a loss without his father or his brother's remnant, so he does the only thing he can think of and goes into Circus Baby's rentals to try to bring back his sister, cutting his losses and taking as much family as he can get. Not fully understanding William's plan and desperate to believe in Elizabeth, he gets scooped. Again borrowing from FuhNaff, Henry gets a job at Fazbear Frights and learns that William has escaped. He burns the place down. I say that at this point he's brought the MCI remnant with him, which is how they reconnect with the puppet and have Happiest Day. It's because of this that Henry mistakenly believes that fire destroys remnant, which sets up his plan for Pizzeria Simulator. This could be cut out and replaced with Rockstar MCI without affecting the rest of the theory, however. From this point it follows FuhNaff's theory. Michael learns his father is still alive in some form, and goes to Pizzeria Simulator to find him. Everyone gets together, Henry burns the place down, the en- I mean Security Breach. Two interesting recontextualizations of lines that come from this theory is that "Although there was a way out planned for you I feel that's not what you want." could be Henry saying he sealed off the exit because Michael is equally a villain as William and wants the same thing, rather than Michael choosing to stay because his story is done. Additionally, Molten Freddy's line "One big happy family" under this theory would be referring to how Michael and William tortured the DCI spirits in pursuit of bringing their family back together, and the spirits are taunting them for getting what they wanted but not in the way they planned. I'm sure there are some issues (that stupid Bonnie Faz Fact), but I really wanted to get this theory out there. I'm really excited about how the FNAF theory community is re-evaluating old assumptions, and hope that this contributes to that renaissance.
Molten MCI never made sense to me. In the night 5 fnaf 3 minigame where William afton dies all of the animatronic parts of the original 4 still lie on the ground straight up debunking it or am i meant to believe that William afton brought them to his bunker and build robots out of them while bleeding to death and his bones being shattered from rusted metal after the whole springlock incident and then walking back to the Freddy's to die in the save room for no reason? I guess the toys still work with molten MCI but that's a whole nother can of worms that i really don't want to open.
I agree so hard with this. Molten MCI forces William to build an entire underground bunker complete with killer robots in like a day, and then he randomly goes back to the pizzeria and gets killed with the animatronics he supposedly melted down literally right outside.
The rockstars being somewhere else in the building makes sense if you remember that the entire pizzeria simulator is specifically built for this purpose. You're buying the animatronics _from Henry._ Additionally we know there are rooms in the building we cant see because Henry said "I am nearby." This also explains why You're able to get these machines on such short notice (seriously, IRL it would take weeks at least to get just one batch of animatronics).
so, if I'm understanding molten mci correctly, it's the theory that after Aften dismantled the fnaf 1 animatronics he used their parts to create the funtimes, however this would be impossible since sister location takes place before fnaf 1, it has to because for Michael to get fired for his whole "oder" issue which is supposedly due him getting scooped, it would have to have happened after sister location and subsequently, after the funtimes where created. so if this isn't the case and molten mci is true then we have to rethink a lot of the story which fits far more in the whole story than molten mci. or I completely misunderstood the theory one or the other.
This whole thing about Afton powering child-killer robots to get more child-murder juice only make sense if we assume that Afton is a motiveless, pure chaotic evil murderer. And... I do not thing this is where the story is heading. By this point it's either that he is a mad scientist trying to find immortality or maybe even bring his kids back.
0:00 the only reason one is reasonable and one isn’t is because it makes zero sense why Henry would keep the animatronics “alive” until the fire. Why not just burn them immediately. The only reason why the salvage animatronics need to be burnt at the same time is to not arouse suspicion. But that doesn’t apply to the rockstars because Henry owns them. However it does make sense that William would use haunted tech to build his animatronics. If we have to make justification for both why choose the less logical one? And another thing is if the rockstars are haunted, who is haunting molten Freddy?
ah yes because it would be totally unrealistic for someone to utilize a rare advanced resource to collect more of said resource, doing something like actually effectively utilizing what you have to obtain more of it instead of burning through what little you have is an entirely unprecedented concept Funtime MCI is almost certainly untrue for other reasons, but you desperately need to work on your debunking capabilities also, depending on where in the story SL takes place, it would be theoretically possible for William to collect the scrap parts from Fazbear's Frights given he was already trying to collect the FNAF1 parts for something, its *very unlikely* that SL takes place *that* late but it is theoretically possible
That area was actually subject to editing hell. I cut it down because the follow up lines had bad tales and were just very slow and clunky. The other reason this interpretation can’t happen, is because William’s alive when Baby’s Pizzaworld opens, but theoretically already got the remnant from the classics, when he dies shortly after doing so, unless night 5’s minigame is several months or something later.
I agree with you on the first point, that yes William harvests the remnant manually first and then uses it to power the funtimes to help him collect remnant more efficiently. The second point is how could William collect the remnant while he is inside springtrap ?
@@monkeyplayz1835 im not sure exactly *how* he would go about doing it, but him dismantling the animatronics then being sent to the same place their scrapped parts got sent to was just too big of a notable thing to *not* bring up i honestly couldnt force an explanation for the how even if i tried, but trying to make it seem likely wasnt really what i was going for, i'm just throwing out the idea that it could happen *somehow* to see if someone else had an idea that fit together with it
1. Yes, while the Funtimes already have the MCI Remnant, Afton would obviously want more. He would want as much as possible to truly understand it. He literally does the same thing in the Novels, where he has the MCI in the Funtimes, but still wants more kids for more Remnant. 2. Andrew says "no matter how many times they burn us" because some of Andrew was in Afton during FNAF 3 and FFPS, while the rest of him was in the Funtimes and then Ennard/Molten Freddy. Soul splitting has been established for a while. Especially with Andrew. 3. They Logbook souls aren't literally in the Logbook. There is no room in the Timeline. It just represents them talking in Fredbear/Golden Freddy. 4. The hill at the end of FFPS clearly represents freedom, especially after the way it's used in SB. So Cassidy's name being obscured implies Cassidy still wasn't ready to rest, joining Andrew in UCN until eventually leaving in the OMC minigame, with Andrew (as represented by Old Man Consequences) refuses to let go, telling her to rest her own soul. 5. The implied connection between the Rockstar and the original animatronics are most likely to show that Henry made the classic animatronics. Not that the MCI souls are in the Rockstars, since Afton melted them down for the Funtimes.
Hey i wanted to mention something that i find odd. Nightmare Bonnie and Rockstar Bonnie are VERY similar build wise. possibly theory base for fnaf 4 having mike in his room behind haunted by the souls of fnaf 1 but freddy wouldnt match.
2:52 All these robots were rented out to parties so maybe they sent without the parties and when the kids are alone and no one's watching them new batch of Soul victims right there
Idk if you know Impulse Evan buy he made a video on Robo Greg and it's very plausible he'll it might be the best explanation I've heard but I would like you take on in I'm sure you could add something to help make it more finite
I always thought of what they meant by "developed by the original Bonnie" was mean Rockstar Bonnie used some inner parts from Classic Bonnie. We don't really know when the Rockstar Animatronics were originally made either between FNaF 2 and FNaF 1 or after FNaF 1 or FNaF 3. We only know that they came from a catalog. Even so, if the spirits' remnant were inside the rockstars, then why have the option to get the good ending in FNaF 3 to begin with?
I’m not sure, but I personally don’t think this matters as much as people assume what Henry said might just be his manifesto for his plans in general rather then somthing current and even if it was, what does it change?
Looking into the link you provide to the reddit post, the original link that stated Scott confirmed these were canon is gone, in fact the twitter page of the said person's account who had the info no longer exists. There also doesn't seem to be any other evidence of this confirmation in google, like, no matter how many times I try typing it, no image of him confirming the unused files and such in AR are canon. So it's now at the point of He said/she said moment as it seems no other fredditor mods who would have this info posted confirming Scott said this is canon. It's also very suspicious that something very important to the lore never reached the fnaf media, Dawko, Jonnyblox, even Kane Karter never post about this cause this would be game breaking for the lore. This is also pondering of the time frame of this reddit post to the release of the ultimate guide would be released 4 months away and doesn't contain any info of the unused AR content, sure it could not have been added cause it was too close to release, but even then, something would have been mention. So sadly until actual evidence of Scott confirming it arises, the unused content is back in that grey area of being canon or not.
I think all of the Funtimes are in some way possessed by Elizabeth, baby seems to have two personalities, one from Elizabeth, and the other from the robot itself, why would Elizabeth talk about the way baby felt when killed Elizabeth from Baby's perspective if at the time she wasn't even possessing baby, and I don't know if the way we hear Elizabeth's voice on sister location secret ending is her spirit itself, or just the voice mimic device inside the animatronics, each robot seem to have their own personality, and any of those feel childish or like a murderer victim, it feels just like what they are, machines build to kill, feral, on a riot to escape the prision where they're locked and electrocuted every single day, but it also seems that the animatronics gained their "Awareness" only after baby kill Elizabeth, maybe this isn't possession, maybe they are their own selfs but sustaining from a dead spirit to keep themselves "alive" maybe the same aplies for burntrap and glamrock freddy. Actually this may apply to all animatronics and would explain why we have more than one animatronic for each dead kid in fnaf 2, maybe the spirits aren't using the animatronics as their bodies, maybe they are just present unawarelly manipulating unanimated objects with their feelings, the only ones who would be aware of this abilities and learn to dominante it would be Charly, Golden freddy, William and Michael, this might explain a lot of stuff actually, the "hallucinations" like the posters, the cardboard animatronics, the number of active animatronics in fnaf 2, the way they roam aimlessly till finding someone (Instead doing like the puppet and going straight for you once it is freed from the music box).
William may think that the spirits are physically bond to the metal, but instead they are emotionally bond with the animatronics, since it was what used to bring them joy when they were alive.
Yo wait there's actually somewhere where Scott said that the datamined stuff from AR is canon? That's actually really useful info. Could I get the link for that if anyone has it? Great video :D
Here you go. www.reddit.com/r/fivenightsatfreddys/comments/p50o08/fnaf_ar_all_emails_2021/?
@@siresquawks Bro your a legend Ryetoast and IDsfantasy watches your videos
@@__Soya__Fr, Game Theory collab when?
Hey phantom bonnie isn’t in fnaf 3 and sire squawks (and me) believe that the phantoms are spirits so the fact that it said specifically rockstar bonnie makes sense
Another bit of info showing that the rockstars are made by Henry is Matpat's recent theory on how we can tell if Henry or Afton made them. The rockstars have the seperate jaws. It just makes sense, if Puppet is responsible for freeing the mci children, it would thematically fit that lefty and the rockstars are the same set
As a long time fan of game theory, I always cherish a MatPat W, no matter how small
@@bluelandyaandgreenlandya1788 Common MatPat W
The wierd thing about modern FNaF theorizing is that instead of proving why their theory is correct, people mostly seem to just state reasons why the other theories have so many problems, while most of the problems themselves only exist to explain their own theory. But thankfully I feel like this period of stagnation in the FNaF theorizing community is finally starting to end, as there are people (like you), who are not afraid to think or look at the pieces of evidence from different angles. Although I'm not sure yet if I believe your theory (not saying I believe MoltenMCI), I will have to say, that it is nice to have something different to think about every once and a while.
Yeah, it's like after a theory becomes well-liked or popular enough people start treating it like canon, disregarding any other interpretation, even though looking at things from every angle is what making theories is all about. MoltenMCI is a perfect example of this, despite being a good theory, people ignore any, and all of its problems because they like it. Some goes with MatPat being weirdly adamant about someone being a robot, almost all of his SB theories include robot people, ignoring any explanations without them.
Yeah. It''s FNaF for crying out loud, there's red herrings and even plotholes in places! Sometimes buildups lead nowhere and all the clues for something go to complete waste as a different idea is made canon.
The way FNaF is going, I can see where people who believe MikeVictim/MikeBot are coming from: don't just look at all the clues for the theories, also look at where exactly the plot seems to be going as a trend.
Added detail for RockstarMCI: the Rockstar animatronics all have 1 risk, while no other animatronic in Pizzeria Simulator has risk other than Ned-Bear and Lefty if you count him separately. This suggests there's something about them that is inherently dangerous.
Plus Mr hugs. Still no idea what that was for except teasing Toy Freddy's mechanic in ucn
@@noahthespike , oh yeah.
@@noahthespike well he is a vacuum those can be dangerous if mishandled like if your hair gets in the sucker
@@siramaytheshowgundragon oof, right
@@siramaytheshowgundragon wait, so, hear me out
vaccumcleanerMCI
I've been mulling this theory over and I came up with a possible modification: LEFTE MCI. What if Henry did rebuild the originals into the rockstars, but extracted all their remnant and put it into LEFTE. This solves a few issues for me.
1. It helps explain something that's always bugged me about the candy cadet stories: The person stitching 5 things into one thing is always the protagonist, not the killer.
2. It removes the 'you don't have to buy them' issue people have mentioned.
3. It works alongside the Molten DCI, meaning you have all 10 murdered kids in those two bodies.
As for why he would do this, I think it would be to help lure the puppet out of hiding. After all, Charlie and the original MCI kids have a very clear affinity for one another. Anywhere they go, she will go as well, trying to put them to rest. So she would recognize their souls/remnant whatever as being in this new animatronic, let her guard down to approach it, and then it does the whole Encapsulate Fuse Transport and Extract part of it's name.
Still not sure if Golden Freddy is involved in anyway, but I thought this might be a thing.
That is actually a REALLY good theory I’m ngl to you. I can get behind that. I actually did put a comment in his last video that Left could have been made of Golden Freddy parts. And Your theory works with it!
This is a solid theory
There is only 1 hole in this. And that is that the Faz-fact states that ROCKSTAR bonnie was built from the OG. This means that bonnie atleast is in Rockstar boonie and not lefty.
@@ragewireloki6213well, when they meant that Rockstar was built with og Bonnie parts, perhaps it was using one of the heads from the Backstage which has no evidence of being haunted yk?
This is a really great video, I think every FNAF fan that says MoltenMCI is proven fact (of which there are a lot) should watch this. Great work!
Also, one of Rockstar Bonnie's voice lines from UCN is "So good to see you AGAIN, my truest friend, etc." so i suppose it could imply that he is in fact made from the OG Bonnie's parts....or maybe im just overthinking it and this line doesnt matter at all-
If im going that deep into it i might as well mention Rockstar Chica's line: "That'll teach ya for tryna trick this OLD bird" which doesnt make much sense if you ask me, since she comes from the newest roster of animatronics up to UCN, that being the Rockstars of course, so i guess this too can be used to back up this theory??
@@raxu8131Rockstar Chica has the southern accent, which if you tie back into MatPats Chica/Mediocre Melodies theory (and the book that he cites as evidence) would be the way the First Chica was characterised and thus the oldest Chica
@@ystacalden No, i get the accent, i was pointing out the fact that she calls herself, quote "an Old bird" implying that she has been around for a long time which would make sense if the Rockstars are actually made from parts of the OG animatronics
The use of the scooper to take out the newly possessed insides to study feels spot on, that seems to be exactly what the game’s suggesting
Sister Location being Parallel is a perfect way to frame where that game fits in the story. I think the name choice was very intentional, on multiple levels; it's a "sister" or something along side other events, other places, other games. It does not have it's own unique spot in the timeline made for it; it's concurrent with other things happening. It's title isn't even a numbered entry of the series; I would argue that Sister Location and FNAF World not sharing naming conventions is suppose to be a huge tell in how they relate to all of the other games in the "mainline series". This continues to fit in with how a lot of the mysteries in FNAF seem to be written and presented; there are very intentional reasons behind whenever something breaks a convention; that's a clear "tell" that you should pick out that detail and consider it a direct indication of something important worth understanding.
I agree. Sister location was likely operating alongside the restaurants. This let them make more money hosting parties at people's homes instead of buying new premises in that market. A new location requires buildout, marketing, developing a local customer base... the rental service is a much better way to enter a new area and convert the guests of that party to brand loyal customers. I'd say the TV shows and other nationally available merchandise would come after they became even bigger.
It is really hard to judge how long certain things were in use/popular. All the buildings look run down during gameplay, well after their hayday, but the stories of the kids' deaths are all during the bright, happy height of Fazbear popularity. Each time a rash of disappearances or deaths happened there was a dip, first for one location and later for the brand, and then it comes back in a revival of the brand.
Pizza Sim is also unnumbered, when it's pretty clearly set shortly after FNAF 3 and before UCN/VR/AR/SB, aka with a unique spot and not concurrent with any other games. The connections to the "sister" in the name are nice, but I'm not convinced those are intentional lore pieces, when the "sister" part of the name has other explanations (namely, Baby).
Still easily could be true, but I wanted to point that out.
0:04 I want to say something in favor of this theory regarding the purchase of the rockstars, while the rockstars arent necessary to be purchased to get the true ending there are drawings of the rockstars in the office which implies someone (I guess kids since its usually kid's drawings in FNAF's offices) have seen the rockstars. They're also kind of the face of the game in the menu
And if anyone was to wonder why they dont attack like Lefty, Molten and the others, well maybe they're parts were took back from the FNAF 3 fire and didnt have much remnant left or theres need for an external force (The Puppet) to make them come to life, either way this could also refer to Henry wondering if the souls are aware
This comment became longer then i originally planned lol, anyway good video 👍
Regarding attacking, couldn’t it also fit in with how Micheal isn’t attacked by MCI animatronics past the Survival Logbook?
@@meathir4921 Could also be, I wasnt thinking of that, but yeah
2:37 I don’t think Possessed is the right word, but moreso the funtimes contain souls rather than said souls controlling the robots, I think there’s a differences.
I feel William wouldn’t be stupid enough to make sure that the robots that he created to explicitly kill kids don’t have said kids controlling his robots, to kill him, I think this is confirmed with Baby explicitly being baby in all of her dialogue (You can argue that “I will make you proud Daddy” is Elizabeth, but even then most of the Dialogue shows that it’s baby talking not her.)
But you do bring up a good point of Baby (Not Elizabeth, Baby herself) being a twisted mirror of Charlie, like that’s something I never would’ve thought about before you said it.
But how would he make sure that the robots didn't get the souls? Stuffed, touched, alive, dead, if there is a human near an animatronic they WILL posses it when that last breath is taken. Balora and Funtime Foxy can't even kill yet they are also possessed...no one talks about that.
Heck, GlamMike is off the basis that Freddy went down into the pit (we don't know how far down, but let's say it was where the voice line triggers) and POSSIBLY got possessed there. I dont think William Afton can control that, nor make sure it doesn't take place.
@@quesproductions7170 I’m not saying that they lack souls (Elizabeth is proof enough) but they can’t control the suits actions, again there’s a difference.
id’s fantasy glam rock Freddy video brings up a point that even if an animatronic is possessed doesn’t mean it has full control the programming can still control the animatronic and even warp the personality of the soul inside it
You can also argue that Elizabeth is controlling Baby but she's bonded with the code and doesn't remember her life before. Remember most other spirits are very animalistic so it's not crazy to say Elizabeth simply doesn't have full consciousness
@@BrendenTait8858 I would say that.. if Baby didn’t spell out her entire backstory with it only being through her perspective and no specific mention of Elizabeth outside of her being just another girl.
Maybe the cupcake fact implies that fazbear can make specialized endoskeletons, like how BB is smaller that the common animatronic or how the Puppet moves so fluidly in VR, actually TH-camrs MidoryArts and GesternAbe from the Hispanic community both gave a try to explaining how it could work (the Puppet I mean)
i also think RockstarMCI helps explain why Lefty is styled after the Rockstars. Henry could have created them as, like, prototype Lefties and then used the possessed parts from the Classics to make sure the "containment" part worked instead of sending all of them out to find Charlie and try to capture her
I honestly believe Rockstar MCI, it to me at least makes more sense and if the rockstars do have parts of the fnaf 1 animatronics in them it would explain why the fazbear fright team couldnt just put the fnaf 1 animatronics back together because they are just shells, henry couldve taken the endos after sealing afton away and made the rockstars with those endos
same
This is quite the interesting theory that I'm surprised I've never heard anyone else say
I think there’s a new wave of FNAF theorists emerging now, that being you, RyeToast, ID’s Fantasy and FuhNaff. Y’all are really helping to push theorising for this series forward, good job
And Dmuted
I personally interpret the “New purpose” and “Ways never thought imaginable” for the originals was Willam using them to hide bodies.
I thought that fnaf theorists were being dramatic when talking about how aggressive their comment section is. Then I made a small comment on twitter about how Mangle could be a disassembled version of Funtime Foxy (MISTAKE)
Personally, you've convinced me with Rockstar MCI. I feel like the biggest issue I've had with every theory is the idea of soul-splitting, that's SO narratively unsatisfying. Gonna make a timeline video, and your takes on more popular theories are super helpful. I can't believe your channel doesn't have more subs, great videos dude, keep it up :)
THIS THEORY SEEMS
VERY
VERY
INTERESTING...
Something you might find interesting is that it’s been said that in long since deleted Illumix Livestreams, Illumix, not Scott, wrote the Faz-Facts themselves.
Hm. That does put a dent in things.
But why would they write something like this about FFPS?
Just because it wasn't written by Scott doesn't mean it's not canon
@@siresquawks I mean, Scott would have had to approve it
@@limefrostart6606he most likely did
Your other video was already good but hearing you expand upon it in this one is amazing. I can't properly explain just how happy I am to see people actually creating their own theories and looking at stuff differently because there's so much people take as canon when we really don't have all that much info and things could really be taken differently. It felt like fnaf was in such a stagnant place where there was just one theory for so long and that was it so I'm so glad to see new theories not just for the current games but for old stuff too because I really love the older games and enjoy seeing new theories about them
After the events of the FNAF3 minigames the saferooms are sealed and a tape is made about them being sealed. The restaurant has to be operational at that point, otherwise there would be no need to make the tape. But if the pizzeria is operational, then all the minigames have to happen in one night, otherwise someone would have discovered the dismantled animatronics. If all of them happen in one night, then there is no time for William to take the parts, melt them down and inject them into the funtimes. So molten MCI makes no sense.
Molten DCI gives William a reason to go to the pizzeria: he needs more remnant.
I like Rockstar MCI. It's more believable then molten MCI. Obviously it has its issues. Another one is the rusted Foxy torso in SB.
Side note: a lot of theories say that Henry (or sometimes William) opens the FNAF2 location, but in FNAF2 we hear "Uh, we're gonna try to contact the original restaurant owner. Uh, I think the name of the place was... 'Fredbear's Family Diner' or something like that. It was closed for years, though, I doubt we'll be able to track anybody down.".
What does the D in DCI stand for? I know MCI is Missing Children Incident.
@@slysamuel5902 Dead
@@slysamuel5902 dead, dci is dead children incident
If the place is still open during the Follow Me minigames, then it would imply that the animatronics being destroyed is what caused it to close down.
@@Jedi-ge6lrfrom what is said in fnaf 1 last news paper, the location closed in the end of the year 1993 because the tragedy that took the same place in 1985 still curses the location in 1993
Honestly I like this theory it’s a nice and clean explanation (something that is always welcome in fnaf theory’s) it also fixes one big issue I have with molten mci which is why even do the rental service if the funtimes already have the mci spirits in them and about what happened to golden Freddy I feel Henry just made lefty with golden Freddy’s parts and having 3 powerful spirits just made it go berserk and that’s why It’s dangerous
it also makes the whole Afton family be there to be burned William ballora as a representation of mrs Afton Elizabeth crying child and mike
Also legally it makes sense that henry made the rockstars cuz he owns their copyright
One mini theory from awhile back that I'm not going to get into detail with right now (maybe at some point in the future) is that Funtime Foxy has a decent chance of being the voice of ‘Circus Baby’ in night 4 of FNaF SL.
It has some interesting implications to it.
the thing about henry keeping the rockstars off screen makes more sense if instead of that he kept the parts of the fnaf 1 animatronics somewhere to reuse them to build the rockstars, something like how the withereds are kept in the fnaf 2 location
I believe in MoltenMCI and "RockstarDCI". For me at least, I think it makes sense that the MCI kids possess the endoskeletons because they were inside the suits, while the DCI kids possess the suits, because their bodies were outside the animatronics.
Then after FNAF 1 William takes the endoskeletons from the originals and puts the remnant into the funtimes, I guess Henry would come back to seal the safe room and take the suits and then with those parts and whatever is left from the FNAF 3 fire he makes the Rockstars.
It has its flaws, but I think it's at least an interesting concept.
Here's a thought about the RockstarMCI, or at least, Rockstars being important to FFPS; why would *they* be the animatronics chosen for the menu screen then if they aren't semi-imprtant at least? Couldn't Scott have used the generic Faz Ent. logo? Or the logo that has the Freddy pointing towards the viewer (yknow, the fnaf withered Freddy lookin' one) ?? Or even Lefty or Helpy?? Just a thought I had watching the previous video
I love the theory and I’m glad I came across the channel. Keep up the good work bro👍
Matpat needs to have you in his fnaf talkback, you'll definitely make the theories more interesting, you and ryetoast both deserve a spot in his talkback
Tangental but Man do I hate that Scott just said data mined and unreleased stuff was canon. I feel like they should have been at least. been published in the encyclopedia or even on his website.
Good video, I'm not sure if I'm convinced on Rock-Star MCI, but I'm also less sure on Molten MCI and Molten DCI. All of them have their issues.
This theory is seriously so good! It makes so much more sense than MoltenMci
The only actual reason people try to defend Molten MCI with "Afton must have gathered the parts of the animatronics off screen" is because they confuse it with Funtimes MCI. These two are not the same, and one does not necessarily need to be true for the other.
That outtake at the end had me cracking up! I ALWAYS enjoy hearing outtakes like that! Hearing you say “Despite the name hurricanes are not the leading cause of children” was HILARIOUS!
i have also theorised that the toy animatronics were also possesed and were the ones melted down to become the funtimes/molten freddy which solves 3 major plot holes
1. what happened to the toys after fnaf 2 (other then having their heads removed for fnaf 3)
2. what happened to the extra bodies (in the fnaf 2 mini game save them we play as Freddy but if you look around you can just see 5 dead kids which are NOT the classic (withered) animatronics due to the fact that the missing kids kids would already be in the animatronics due to William stuffing them in the suits and the toys being on stage)
3. why the toy animatronics go berzerk after night 3 but before night 4 as thats when william killed the DKI (the dead kids incident because the bodies are just out in the open so they aren't "missing")
which this is also likely the case due to the fact that the original MCI kids moved on after fnaf 3 (except golden freddy) due to the events of the secret minigames and fnaf world clock ending (which is just the fnaf 3 mini games just done in the MCI/DKI/puppet/gold/bite victim perspective)
but if the DKI was melted down into molten freddy then what explains the rockstar animatronics (mainly the bonnie evidence you pointed out), simple the toy animatronics were made using possessed parts of the classic animatonics which parts of the toys were used in the refurbished (fnaf 1) animatronics (explaining their more erratic behavours with foxy running at a bajillion miles and hour and bonnie seemingly just teleporting) and the other parts melted down in secret to create the funtimes which splits the reminant between fnaf 1s refurbished animatronics (where the MCI and DKI are combined) the fun times (with the melted down parts) and the remaining parts (if there is any) seemingly scrapped or put into the rockstars years later (they use fnaf 1 endos so that wont surprise me)
This makes me really happy. I enjoy the rockstarMCI a lot
I love the graphics you made/used for the different gags here, like Malhare editing a Wikipedia article.
I really like the Rockstar MCI theory. Even if they are only partial souls, and the other part of the souls was in the Toys who became/were injected into the Funtimes, it still explains what happened to the haunted parts we saw in the first game's animatronics and how they end up on site in Pizzeria Simulator. Great video!
and the rockstars kinda look like the toys too
Despite the name Hurricanes are not the leading cause of childre-
* proceeds to die of laughter *
I need more funny Sire Squawks outtakes like this one
The Save Them children possesed the Toy animatronics, and their souls never appeared again, aside from ARGUABLY FNaF 3 and ARGUABLY Custom Night.
"No matter how many times they burn us" I believe that this is Cassidy just-- Speaking for the other spriits while they aren't there to speak for themselves.
Then that still implies that some group of spirits have been burned multiple times. Which never happens in Molten MCI.
@@siresquawks I'm thinking more with the idea of the Phantoms. I don't believe Molten MCI either.
recently found your channel and im in love holy shit
Stormister made a really good video that explains how Golden Freddy was burned in the the FNaF6 ending. Afton wanted to rip parts off of himself in the Spring Bonnie suit because of how susceptible it was to following children wherever heard like in FNaF3. The theory is that Afton found the Golden Freddy suit & ripped parts off of it to make a new suit, hence why his head looks so disproportionate & he actually has suited feet. That is how Cassidy is able to tie their soul to William, they are part of the same suit & therefore they were both burned leading quite nicely into UCN.
4:55 I feel this is not golden Freddy saying they have been burned multiple times but rather now that their soul is tied to Afton no matter how many times Afton burns Cassidy won’t let him pass on
Nice video squawks, it was interesting, because before I didn't actually put together the concept of RockstarMCI, before I mostly thought the Rockstar Bonnie fact was suggesting Withered Bonnie's appearance resembled Rockstar Bonnie, most likely in his face, which of course he doesn't have.
1:23 "I used the toddlers to destroy the toddlers."
DCI is something. Why have two sets of murdered children in a story, unless you need two sets? I write, a lot, and one of the many aspects of fiction most writers will tell you is that any plot point that can be used to solve/cause multiple aspects of a story is always important to use, instead of creating multiple new but highly similar events. In the real world, there are redundant events that occur all the time, but in writing it's highly suggested to be avoided, because everything being too coincidental is seen as less annoying to readers then making them keep track of multiple, similar but not the same events.
MCI is first, DCI is second. I think one way to solve them is to ask what MCI does not cover, thus legitimizing the need for DCI to have happened. I am not arguing Scott is a writing genius; these techniques/choices in writing are things you quickly discover while telling a third party your story. So how can we divide up the events in the game to show it would be useful for two events in which several children are yeeted at the same time? One hint I think is important to consider is the implied visual that DCI is an open crime scene. The killer in DCI does not care about keeping a secret anymore, where as MCI may imply the killer in that situation wants to conceal it. The acronyms kinda cover this; MCI is about "missing" children never found, DCI is about kids that clearly had never been missing. Perhaps one way to figure it out is to identify when William might have "run out" of "material" and would be in need of collecting more? Is there a point in the timeline where we can't say there is "unused" remnant vs. when it's all accounted for?
What does MCI and DCI stand for? I’m a little lost 😅
If we were to put Sister Location before the 2 game (maybe by literal days) then DCI would be because William has no more Remnant as it was injected into Michael when he got Scooped, then he (Michael as Fritz) arrives just when the dayshift position (possibly William with an alias) get available just late of finding his father
@@gray1013 MCI = Missing Children Incident. The incident described in the FNAF 1 newspapers about 5 missing children who lured to the back room by William Afton in a mascot costume and killed. These kids would go on to possess Freddy, Foxy, Bonnie, and Chica and Golden Freddy.
DCI = Dead Children Incident. This incident is shown in FNAF 2's SAVE THEM minigame where we see at least 5 dead kids scattered around the FNAF 2's location also killed Afton. These kids are assumedly not the same as the MCI kids because the OGs are already possessed by the time this minigame takes place. It is believes that these kids go on to possess the Toy Animatronics.
Hope this helps.
Hope this helps.
Thank you! I definitely think at this point it’s too late to bring the fnaf 2 dead kids back into the series, and it’s especially pointless after Fnaf 6.
@@Takejiro24, Helps tons, thanks!
The only instance I think “MoltenMCI”would work if it isn’t the MCI but the DCI but I think it is easier to say “new dead kids are in the Funtimes”
Something I think could be used by both sides (those that believe in RockstMCI, and those who don't) is that yeah, the Rockstars aren't required for getting the true ending, but we don't know what animatronics Michael bought. We know some of the things he bought thanks to SB, but we don't know all the animatronics he bought.
I believe that canonically, michael did buy the rockstars, or its possible the rockstars were already at the location from the start, since we literally see children's drawings of the rockstar animatronics in the fnaf 6 office.
It's always good to have different perspectives on things to help look back and critically think about theories from the past. Even though I'm not sold on this theory there is solid evidence. Just goes to show how messed up the lore is currently.
I love the FNAF theory renaissance
This whole video is a W 🙌🙌🙌
We never really know how many kids died. Sure, we know five spirits hung around and possessed the OG restaurant, but not every dead kid has to become a ghost! The fun times are designed to kill kids on the daily, and then get scooped out and experimented with.
So much of this story is just someone's interpretation of some symbolism.
Another thing to add to rockstar MCI. SB has burned endos that seem to be from the OG animatronics in rockstar row
Just had a thought revisiting this video for research. I don't know how Henry would be privy to this information, but under Roctstar MCI, the may not need to be present in the FNAF 6 fire because happiest day is what frees them, not William's death. It may even be possible that happiest day occured after fnaf 3, in which case Cassidy may have pulled an Andrew and attached to William until Fnaf 6. To continue the line of thought, Henry may even have been aware that they were freed, and decided to not to make them mandatory for the true ending. There's some useful pieces here, I'm just not sure how they fit together yet.
Actually… RockstarMCI makes a lot more sense than FuntimeMCI. The soul splitting excuse doesn’t feel right.
Great video. I think I’m sold. If we leave the toys out of it (I also thought of moltenToyMCI) then it makes perfect sense. If MoltenToyMCI is true, then sister location would be after fnaf 2, which kinda makes it silly for the funtimes being made to capture children if they’re already made from souls…Like what’s the point. Also Elizabeth would have to had died after fnaf or during fnaf 2. Which seems way to late. My guess is it’s just the kids the fun times captured. OR. Baby was made much earlier, but then who else would be with her at circus baby’s pizza world then, ya know?
Molten mci also doesnt make sense with the follow me minigame unless ol willy is taking abart one animatronic a night for some reason. I dont think hes going anywhere (for 30 years) after getting springlocked and wouldnt have a chance to take parts or remnant back to the funtimes :V
10:40 I am a MoltenMCI2 believer, and I also am a RockstarMCI believer. Perhaps due to gaslighting from William, and people believing Michael was crazy about the “rumours,” perhaps the DCI was to motivate him into trying to find out what was going on under the alias of Fritz Smith, and him tampering with the animatronics due to William’s gaslighting and his curiosity based on what he heard, they come to life at night, “rumours.” This makes the DCI actually relevant, and have a FORM of MoltenMCI; er- MoltenMCI2 AND RockstarMCI both work, and both make somewhat sense!
when he said "he lured them back with familiar tricks" is a reference to when Willam uses a shadow Freddy suit to lure the classics near the safe room to then dismantle them
I dont think shadow freddy is a physical suit. Shadow freddy is a spectre created from the agony of william's actions and the horrors that occurred in the fazbear franchise. I think william used the spring bonnie suit in follow me, but the animatronics seeing William as shadow freddy is meant to be symbolic
MoltenMCI and RockstarMCI could both coexist. Ppl forget there was a 2nd MCI in 1987 and we never saw the toy animatronics again past 1987 (only their outer shells in FNAF3 without their endoskeletons)
That’s called the DCI (dead children’s incident)
5:11 guess who occasionally shows up in the corner of the office
Wow, this theory is really good
I believe that the funtimes are built from the scraped toys endos.
I’d like to think that Henry put speakers all around The Dining Area so the Rockstars can here every words he saying.
Ok ill be honest ive never thought of the MCI kids in fnaf 6 like this and it honestly fits perfectly with the way the game seems to treat the whole "Bringing them all together in one place" thing, also I love the idea of GF always following the aftons like in spirit it makes more sense if you think about it
great video ! my only problem with rockstar mci is that if there made after fnaf 3 fire what remnant would be in them (i believe dci kids are in molten freddy)
By pure coincidence the other day I also had a bit of a headache over the Vengeful spirit line
"No matter how many time they burn us."
Because that implies both TOYSNHK has been burned multiple times which is really weird if they're not in molten Freddy, it's pretty weird even if it is given the whole "No matter how many times" thing, but fnaf theorizing is basically just alchemy themed poetry analysis and as such there's always alternate metaphorical interpretations
What I would go with is when Cassidy or whoever says "Us" they're referring to all the haunted children robot suits, the toy animatronics and the classics were in the middle of the fnaf 3 fire and a bunch of ghost things were in fnaf 6 so it would add up, plus the phantoms appearing burnt could imply even more fires but who knows, "us" doesn't fundamentally mean Golden Freddy is referring to just themselves and William, us is a very vague word. Michael and Henry both tried to release William and a pile of kids souls, "They burn us".
plus they use the pronoun "they" which mean they're probably either talking about multiple people or some general thing that doesn't refer to anything in particular like when people say "No matter how many times *they* knock me down I get back up", I'd lean towards the former
Furthermore "They burn us" could just mean a general term for death or suffering in general as fnaf 6 and 3 were supposed to be the death of the entire series and they both end in fire, like no matter what William goes through they'll be there preventing it from ever ending. but that's looser and kinda drops the "they" so idk
also you weren't sure how golden Freddy got to fnaf 6 location, they might've just used some soul whatever to tortures William from a distance, but fnaf 1 and midnight motorist both kinda sorta maybe imply from a certain point that Golden Freddy can straight up teleport so there's that, that's the explanation I went with
1:35 because he is still figuring out how it works. His end goal with remnant is to live forever. He doesn't have a practical way to test that yet. Hence the Funtimes.
About the whole Hurricane thing… I know the trilogy is an alternate timeline, but it does mention multiple times that it’s set in Hurricane, Utah. So Special Delivery technically isn’t the first source to state that FNAF is set in Hurricane.
That wasn't my point. My point was that this was a confirmation that this was also true for the game timeline.
1. The problem is, if Henry had the rockstars in the pizzeria we wouldn't have to buy them.
2. No one said the funtimes were made to get remnant JUST FOR THEM. They can also gather it for William. Why would they have that design in the first place if it would only serve to be used 1 time? Because it is not just for them. But either way, what other explanation is there to explain the fact that the souls are literally being used?
3. Well, no. Henry didn't specify if they were still trapped in the prisons of his making. He said "souls trapped" and that can be used to say "souls that were trapped" not necessarily "are". And again, he later says they are NOW being set to new purpose and used in ways he can't imagine. How could they still be in HIS machines if they are being used?
4. Just remember: "being USED in ways he never thought imaginable"
5. I disagree that the funtimes having random kids' souls is a better narrative than them having the MCI souls. Them having the MCI (+CC) souls literally makes all of the important characters of the lore being in 1 place in fnaf 6. All of them.
6. The phrase "how many times they burn us" in my opinion doesn't necessarily imply Cassidy has been burned multiple times, but sure, if we count, it would be: their souls in Mike in fnaf 3's fire, then fnaf 6, and also when their soul was melted down with the others to inject them into the funtimes. That's enough times.
7. Yes, it IS weird phrasing but still, "developed from" can STILL be talking about the design, it's true they could have straight up said "inspired from the design" but that same way they could have said "made out of".
8. MoltenDCI is a better way to explain it, but I believe it's just the same as MoltenMCI. It really only changes the exact way the souls were melted, but still, all of the evidence works the same way.
9. But I do believe that RockstarMCI makes less sense than MoltenMCI.
Imo the fun times have got to be new possessions or were used from parts from the toy animatronic
I have an explanation for the Golden Freddy in the fires thing I believe that the Crying Child was the fifth soul inside of Molten Freddy, and that Cassidy was attached to William after "Follow Me." BV was in Molten Freddy, Cassidy/Vengeful Spirit was not. That's what I believe.
4:58 definitely going off on a limb here but, maybe Golden Freddy can take on the form of the Purple Freddy from the follow me minigames? it would explain why the Purple Freddy wants the other 4 to follow him to the safe room to be dismantled and allow them to gang up on William (of course assuming he somehow knew this would happen) and could explain what he meant by this as Shadow Freddy CAN appear in the FNAF 3 office and assumingly would be burned with the rest of the Fazbear's Fright.
That and the fact that I don't think Golden Freddy has physically existed since he was Withered (I doubt while remaking the FNAF 1 gang they'd remake Golden freddy too but idk you never know) and was probably scrapped along with the toys, (if that suit ever even existed too lol) so it wouldn't be too far of stretch to think that (especially since in Golden Freddy's case there wasn't anything for William to dismantle) once the others were destroyed he decides to change from the Purple or Shadow Freddy form to take on the form of a dead ghost kid to match the others and lead the charge scaring Will and then reappear as shadow/purple freddy in the FNAF 3 location 30 years later as his angry soul is still attached to William.
(that of course kinda pokes a hole in my theory, as why would an entirely non physical entity care about being burned but idk I'm a bit rusty on the lore and I'm kinda just spitballing at this point lol.)
This video inspired me to consider RyeToast's Molten DCI theory (th-cam.com/video/TGiRKuVHp-E/w-d-xo.html) in combination with FuhNaff's new Mike Villain theory (th-cam.com/video/7v-MW_g-2Iw/w-d-xo.html).
With these interpretations combined, we find William and Michael both regretting their poor choices that led to the deaths of family members (Elizabeth for William, Crying Child for Michael). Instead of growing apart, they bond over the promise to put their family back together.
As in RyeToast's theory, Michael comes in at the end of FNAF 2 to claim the DCI endoskeletons for remnant. He and William use this remnant with the Funtimes to experiment, learning enough about the substance to feel confident in an attempt to bring their family back.
However, while they have Elizabeth's remnant they still need to get the Crying Child back. So, Michael goes to the FNAF 1 locations and tampers with the animatronics, programming them to do the "Follow Me" minigame so that William can disassemble them.
Unfortunately this frees the spirits, and he gets springtrapped. As in your video it's actually Henry who takes the endoskeletons, which he studies in order to understand remnant for the FNAF 6 Insanity ending. You could say he takes them for Rockstar MCI, but despite the weird Faz Fact I'm not totally on board with that theory.
Regardless, Michael is now at a loss without his father or his brother's remnant, so he does the only thing he can think of and goes into Circus Baby's rentals to try to bring back his sister, cutting his losses and taking as much family as he can get. Not fully understanding William's plan and desperate to believe in Elizabeth, he gets scooped.
Again borrowing from FuhNaff, Henry gets a job at Fazbear Frights and learns that William has escaped. He burns the place down. I say that at this point he's brought the MCI remnant with him, which is how they reconnect with the puppet and have Happiest Day. It's because of this that Henry mistakenly believes that fire destroys remnant, which sets up his plan for Pizzeria Simulator. This could be cut out and replaced with Rockstar MCI without affecting the rest of the theory, however.
From this point it follows FuhNaff's theory. Michael learns his father is still alive in some form, and goes to Pizzeria Simulator to find him. Everyone gets together, Henry burns the place down, the en- I mean Security Breach. Two interesting recontextualizations of lines that come from this theory is that "Although there was a way out planned for you I feel that's not what you want." could be Henry saying he sealed off the exit because Michael is equally a villain as William and wants the same thing, rather than Michael choosing to stay because his story is done. Additionally, Molten Freddy's line "One big happy family" under this theory would be referring to how Michael and William tortured the DCI spirits in pursuit of bringing their family back together, and the spirits are taunting them for getting what they wanted but not in the way they planned.
I'm sure there are some issues (that stupid Bonnie Faz Fact), but I really wanted to get this theory out there. I'm really excited about how the FNAF theory community is re-evaluating old assumptions, and hope that this contributes to that renaissance.
Molten MCI never made sense to me. In the night 5 fnaf 3 minigame where William afton dies all of the animatronic parts of the original 4 still lie on the ground straight up debunking it or am i meant to believe that William afton brought them to his bunker and build robots out of them while bleeding to death and his bones being shattered from rusted metal after the whole springlock incident and then walking back to the Freddy's to die in the save room for no reason? I guess the toys still work with molten MCI but that's a whole nother can of worms that i really don't want to open.
I agree so hard with this. Molten MCI forces William to build an entire underground bunker complete with killer robots in like a day, and then he randomly goes back to the pizzeria and gets killed with the animatronics he supposedly melted down literally right outside.
The rockstars being somewhere else in the building makes sense if you remember that the entire pizzeria simulator is specifically built for this purpose. You're buying the animatronics _from Henry._ Additionally we know there are rooms in the building we cant see because Henry said "I am nearby."
This also explains why You're able to get these machines on such short notice (seriously, IRL it would take weeks at least to get just one batch of animatronics).
so, if I'm understanding molten mci correctly, it's the theory that after Aften dismantled the fnaf 1 animatronics he used their parts to create the funtimes, however this would be impossible since sister location takes place before fnaf 1, it has to because for Michael to get fired for his whole "oder" issue which is supposedly due him getting scooped, it would have to have happened after sister location and subsequently, after the funtimes where created. so if this isn't the case and molten mci is true then we have to rethink a lot of the story which fits far more in the whole story than molten mci. or I completely misunderstood the theory one or the other.
This whole thing about Afton powering child-killer robots to get more child-murder juice only make sense if we assume that Afton is a motiveless, pure chaotic evil murderer.
And... I do not thing this is where the story is heading. By this point it's either that he is a mad scientist trying to find immortality or maybe even bring his kids back.
0:00 the only reason one is reasonable and one isn’t is because it makes zero sense why Henry would keep the animatronics “alive” until the fire. Why not just burn them immediately. The only reason why the salvage animatronics need to be burnt at the same time is to not arouse suspicion. But that doesn’t apply to the rockstars because Henry owns them. However it does make sense that William would use haunted tech to build his animatronics. If we have to make justification for both why choose the less logical one?
And another thing is if the rockstars are haunted, who is haunting molten Freddy?
Finally, somebody who uses the scrapped FNAF AR facts to make theories 🎉
Thanks for the heart, can I ask you something, I had an idea now and I want your opinion
ah yes because it would be totally unrealistic for someone to utilize a rare advanced resource to collect more of said resource, doing something like actually effectively utilizing what you have to obtain more of it instead of burning through what little you have is an entirely unprecedented concept
Funtime MCI is almost certainly untrue for other reasons, but you desperately need to work on your debunking capabilities
also, depending on where in the story SL takes place, it would be theoretically possible for William to collect the scrap parts from Fazbear's Frights given he was already trying to collect the FNAF1 parts for something, its *very unlikely* that SL takes place *that* late but it is theoretically possible
That area was actually subject to editing hell. I cut it down because the follow up lines had bad tales and were just very slow and clunky.
The other reason this interpretation can’t happen, is because William’s alive when Baby’s Pizzaworld opens, but theoretically already got the remnant from the classics, when he dies shortly after doing so, unless night 5’s minigame is several months or something later.
I agree with you on the first point, that yes William harvests the remnant manually first and then uses it to power the funtimes to help him collect remnant more efficiently.
The second point is how could William collect the remnant while he is inside springtrap ?
@@monkeyplayz1835 im not sure exactly *how* he would go about doing it, but him dismantling the animatronics then being sent to the same place their scrapped parts got sent to was just too big of a notable thing to *not* bring up
i honestly couldnt force an explanation for the how even if i tried, but trying to make it seem likely wasnt really what i was going for, i'm just throwing out the idea that it could happen *somehow* to see if someone else had an idea that fit together with it
1. Yes, while the Funtimes already have the MCI Remnant, Afton would obviously want more. He would want as much as possible to truly understand it. He literally does the same thing in the Novels, where he has the MCI in the Funtimes, but still wants more kids for more Remnant.
2. Andrew says "no matter how many times they burn us" because some of Andrew was in Afton during FNAF 3 and FFPS, while the rest of him was in the Funtimes and then Ennard/Molten Freddy. Soul splitting has been established for a while. Especially with Andrew.
3. They Logbook souls aren't literally in the Logbook. There is no room in the Timeline. It just represents them talking in Fredbear/Golden Freddy.
4. The hill at the end of FFPS clearly represents freedom, especially after the way it's used in SB. So Cassidy's name being obscured implies Cassidy still wasn't ready to rest, joining Andrew in UCN until eventually leaving in the OMC minigame, with Andrew (as represented by Old Man Consequences) refuses to let go, telling her to rest her own soul.
5. The implied connection between the Rockstar and the original animatronics are most likely to show that Henry made the classic animatronics. Not that the MCI souls are in the Rockstars, since Afton melted them down for the Funtimes.
Hey i wanted to mention something that i find odd. Nightmare Bonnie and Rockstar Bonnie are VERY similar build wise.
possibly theory base for fnaf 4 having mike in his room behind haunted by the souls of fnaf 1 but freddy wouldnt match.
2:52 All these robots were rented out to parties so maybe they sent without the parties and when the kids are alone and no one's watching them new batch of Soul victims right there
4:20 Baby is a mirror of Charlie's character? I wonder... does nightmarione represent baby?
That would be weirdly confusing but maybe....
Idk if you know Impulse Evan buy he made a video on Robo Greg and it's very plausible he'll it might be the best explanation I've heard but I would like you take on in I'm sure you could add something to help make it more finite
Golden Freddy could’ve been in FNAF 3. There’s an Easter egg where FNAF 2 Golden Freddy appears on the far left side of the office.
It's shadow freddy
My favorite fnaf character:Henry Emily aka buff charlie
Hurr-ehh-kan utah
Yeah by bad.
I actually never thought the fun times were possessed. I just thought they were ai
I always thought of what they meant by "developed by the original Bonnie" was mean Rockstar Bonnie used some inner parts from Classic Bonnie. We don't really know when the Rockstar Animatronics were originally made either between FNaF 2 and FNaF 1 or after FNaF 1 or FNaF 3. We only know that they came from a catalog. Even so, if the spirits' remnant were inside the rockstars, then why have the option to get the good ending in FNaF 3 to begin with?
The idea is similar to what many have argued for MoltenMCI and other theories. The hood ending is an event yet to occur.
@@siresquawks fck yeah, the hood ending 😂
6:41
Or its literal being the retcon removed golden freddy from the mci
Based theory very strong.
I’m not sure, but I personally don’t think this matters as much as people assume what Henry said might just be his manifesto for his plans in general rather then somthing current and even if it was, what does it change?
8:17 Utahn nitpick here, the city is actually pronounced hurri-kin, not hurricane
Looking into the link you provide to the reddit post, the original link that stated Scott confirmed these were canon is gone, in fact the twitter page of the said person's account who had the info no longer exists. There also doesn't seem to be any other evidence of this confirmation in google, like, no matter how many times I try typing it, no image of him confirming the unused files and such in AR are canon.
So it's now at the point of He said/she said moment as it seems no other fredditor mods who would have this info posted confirming Scott said this is canon.
It's also very suspicious that something very important to the lore never reached the fnaf media, Dawko, Jonnyblox, even Kane Karter never post about this cause this would be game breaking for the lore. This is also pondering of the time frame of this reddit post to the release of the ultimate guide would be released 4 months away and doesn't contain any info of the unused AR content, sure it could not have been added cause it was too close to release, but even then, something would have been mention. So sadly until actual evidence of Scott confirming it arises, the unused content is back in that grey area of being canon or not.
I thought it was obvious, the Funtime part.
I think all of the Funtimes are in some way possessed by Elizabeth, baby seems to have two personalities, one from Elizabeth, and the other from the robot itself, why would Elizabeth talk about the way baby felt when killed Elizabeth from Baby's perspective if at the time she wasn't even possessing baby, and I don't know if the way we hear Elizabeth's voice on sister location secret ending is her spirit itself, or just the voice mimic device inside the animatronics, each robot seem to have their own personality, and any of those feel childish or like a murderer victim, it feels just like what they are, machines build to kill, feral, on a riot to escape the prision where they're locked and electrocuted every single day, but it also seems that the animatronics gained their "Awareness" only after baby kill Elizabeth, maybe this isn't possession, maybe they are their own selfs but sustaining from a dead spirit to keep themselves "alive" maybe the same aplies for burntrap and glamrock freddy.
Actually this may apply to all animatronics and would explain why we have more than one animatronic for each dead kid in fnaf 2, maybe the spirits aren't using the animatronics as their bodies, maybe they are just present unawarelly manipulating unanimated objects with their feelings, the only ones who would be aware of this abilities and learn to dominante it would be Charly, Golden freddy, William and Michael, this might explain a lot of stuff actually, the "hallucinations" like the posters, the cardboard animatronics, the number of active animatronics in fnaf 2, the way they roam aimlessly till finding someone (Instead doing like the puppet and going straight for you once it is freed from the music box).
William may think that the spirits are physically bond to the metal, but instead they are emotionally bond with the animatronics, since it was what used to bring them joy when they were alive.
my only issue with this theory is that the rockstars aren’t required for the game, including that final ending
This might be a dumb question, but why don't have Cassidy Afton theory? Do we have proof beyond the books that there are two kids in golden Freddy?
The "proof" from the books doesn't actually work. There is 3 spirits in the supposed golden freddy book counterpart,one being afton