Lankford on Fox News: Border Crisis is a National Security Crisis

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 84

  • @user-sw8py5ep6g
    @user-sw8py5ep6g หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thank you Senator. You did your best.

  • @bellsofohio
    @bellsofohio 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    "If we're pursuing everything, we very often end up with nothing. If we're pursuing someone coming later to fix it, later seems to never come. When we have a moment to fix things, we should fix as many things as we can then, then come back later and fix the rest."
    Yup, unfortunately most people don't seem to get this. Too many people give up opportunities to improve things now if they think it somehow makes the other party look bad. And it's usually a failing strategy because voters are too unpredictable.

  • @pamelagordon5645
    @pamelagordon5645 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    A lot of us appreciate the work you were trying to do. Under normal circumstances, this would have made a huge difference at the border. This is not normal times for the republican party. I am sorry.

    • @chamilton8535
      @chamilton8535 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly, you can't be a republican and be MAGA. You have to pick one. Sadly, most pick MAGA because they are afraid of Trump ruining their careers.

  • @rfrbz1269
    @rfrbz1269 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    It's very brave for this man to admit the truth about how Trump killed the bill for his campaign and to not only admit it on national television, on a biased network, but to proudly display it on his platform.
    We need more people like this man

    • @wendyrbielski2759
      @wendyrbielski2759 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Needed, Democrats to bring forth much better for Responsible to American Citizen Bills.

    • @heyskipj
      @heyskipj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No we don't. The bill itself was AWFUL. I have no desire grading GOPsters on a curve.

    • @luvlabso130
      @luvlabso130 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fact check: Trump didn't kill the so-called bipartisan border bill. The grassroots was already up in arms, as were more than enough Republican congressmen and senators to kill the bill. Senator Lankford was McConnell's stooge. Lankford wasn't up for reelection until 2029, and so, they figured he was the right man for the job. They assumed we'd just forget about it by the time he was up for reelection.
      The legislation was a Uniparty project and a defacto open border bill that would have made catch and release permanent, authorized 1.8 million border crossers a year, granted automatic work permits to illegals, and forever relegated border patrol to paper pushers whose only job was to parole millions of illegals every year into the interior.
      It was as much an anti-immigration bill as the Inflation Reduction Act was an anti-inflation bill.
      It died because it was stupid, dangerous, and insane. Trump didn't like the bill. Nor did any sane American.
      Once again, shame on Senator Lankford for even proposing such a dumpster fire. We will not forget.

  • @VincentVonDudler
    @VincentVonDudler 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    4:38 - For candidly speaking and holding people accountable much respect for Cavuto. And for his efforts to fix the issue respect for Lankford.

  • @JMYKTV
    @JMYKTV 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    The worst Congress of my lifetime.

    • @objective_evaluation
      @objective_evaluation 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The worst GOP by far…it’s remarkable how disorganized they are.

    • @GetToDaChoppa-k5r
      @GetToDaChoppa-k5r 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trump blocked the bill.

  • @rdrmagic1
    @rdrmagic1 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    At least you tried senator

  • @Benjamin-y9x
    @Benjamin-y9x 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    How many people did Jesus deport from Judea?

  • @paulmike1166
    @paulmike1166 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just enforce the EXISTING law!!!!

    • @Waterfiendz
      @Waterfiendz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The current law says we have to take in all asylum seekers because it's intl humanitarian law to... The bill would have at least capped the number per day (which breaks intl law but nobody is going to call the US on it considering the situation). But yeah the problem isn't in enforcing the law, it's that the law is abusable in it's current state, and repubs killed an important change...

    • @eddyngoie5846
      @eddyngoie5846 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The existing law is the reason what we have this crisis in the first place. Are you guys illiterate or what? The existing law literally encourage illegal immigration. People have more benefits coming here illegally than legally. People like you shouldn’t vote.

    • @88jaspersimmons
      @88jaspersimmons หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Waterfiendz👏 👏 👏
      I am sure @paulmike1166 understands this, but chooses not to acknowledge what you are saying

  • @stevendaleschmitt
    @stevendaleschmitt หลายเดือนก่อน

    Liars. He wrote the legislation.
    "Democracies get the government they deserve." -Montaigne

  • @gregbrodsky5390
    @gregbrodsky5390 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Enforce in existing law that's all that needs to happen I don't want to give Trump more power and I don't want to give Biden more power we just need to enforce all the laws that are on the books this bill was not a border security bill it was immigration reform!!!

    • @objective_evaluation
      @objective_evaluation 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why didn’t Trump fix it?

    • @Waterfiendz
      @Waterfiendz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The existing law is the problem. Currently it follows Intl Humanitarian Law which insists uncapped Asylum Seekers. Right now people are showing up at the border and claiming asylum seeking status, which requires us by LAW to process their case. This bill was seeking to cap that number to 5000 which breaks intl humanitarian law - but nobody is going to complain much on that. - The problem is that a loophole is being abused and our courts are backed up and we can't process all the false asylum seekers.

    • @eddyngoie5846
      @eddyngoie5846 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Read what you wrote again if you can realize how d*mb what you saying is. The existing law is the problem. It was written in a different time. You don’t even know the history of your country and you are the one talking too much. Go educate yourself. It’s not about giving more power to the president. When Congress pass a bill they don’t give more power to the president they just pass a new law. The existing law is being enforced all right with all the loopholes he has. The existing laws encourage illegal immigration. You have more benefits coming here illegally than legally.

    • @courtneydillard1217
      @courtneydillard1217 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      OK but the law on the books are almost 45 years old. Things have changed since then.

  • @La_Cruz
    @La_Cruz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    God bless you Senator Lankford

    • @shocfacter
      @shocfacter 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If gods existed do you think they'd give a crap about THIS dude? 🤣

  • @Sher7061
    @Sher7061 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I wish someone would have asked what the plan is to do now, with the millions of illegal immigrants they have funded to come here. We might as well deal with it now, they are here because Obiden planned it, so what is the plan now ??

    • @LudiCrust.
      @LudiCrust. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How exactly did Obama or Biden plan this…? Trump dealt with it worse than anyone. He never once tried to actually solve the problem. All he did was use it as a political weapon. Even worse multiple people in his inner circle either directly or indirectly stole from a fraudulent “private fundraiser” that never could’ve realistically built any wall because ITS ON FEDERAL LAND. Trump himself used $19B to tear down effective wall that had nothing wrong with it & replaced it with a grossly inferior wall that not only can be climbed by obese people with little upper body strength but also can literally be blown over by wind…! Wanna know the kicker?…it cost another $30B to fix it. $49B COMPLETELY WASTED. The illegal immigration problem cannot & will not be fixed by a new border wall. There already is a border wall on every part of the border people can easily cross. 90% of the border that doesn’t have a wall is completely impassable & the rest is so isolated & dangerous no one ever tries to cross because there’s a 99% chance they’ll die. Trump doesn’t care about illegal immigration nor does any Republican or Democrat that represents a territory/state that’s not on the border. It’s a fear mongering scare tactic both sides are using to raise money from people.

  • @L3S451
    @L3S451 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well I’m not ever voting for you ever again.

  • @tombev9717
    @tombev9717 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What I would like to know senator Lankford is WHY did you allow/include the number of 5000 migrants a day into that Bill, why not a much smaller number like 0, how about suspending the asylum process until this is gotten under control, why not put extra agents on the backlog of legal immigrants who have put in the paperwork to come legally, I'm waiting for my wife's paperwork to finish processing, when I turned in the last of the paperwork it was 18 months to process,we are currently at 19 months, then 20 and 22 now it's up to 24 months, by the time we get to 24 months it will be 30, then 35, we will never get caught up to the time frame, it's terrible that the spouse of a U.S. citizen has to keep waiting for illegals to be process 🤬

    • @tgray1957
      @tgray1957 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How hard is it to understand that Senator Lankford doesn't have unilateral authority over the border? How hard is it to understand that the bill that was passed in the Senate is a good bill, but because of gamesmanship from Trump and his MAGA ring kissers we don't even have that? The bill doesn't simply allow 5,000 a day into the US, it allows for the detention of 5,000 to be processed and deported. It also allows for additional judges and staff to process and additional border patrol. Trump has absolutely no governmental authority, but the MAGA reps in the House are taking orders from this incompetent bungling idiot instead of doing the job that they were elected to do. Shame on every one of those that are relinquishing their authority to him. It's an absolute disgrace.

    • @robh2672
      @robh2672 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Holy💩! How much or little did you watch/listen to what he said(which is what has been disseminated by many policy analysts) smh

    • @Waterfiendz
      @Waterfiendz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Limiting the asylum process already goes against international law (but we have some flexibility being the united state), but reducing that to 0 would get quite a bit of side eyeing by the intl community. Technically granting asylum is supposed to be an uncapped process by intl humanitarian law, but it's getting abused so badly that we have some leeway on it. To be pedantic we wouldn't be allowing 5000 migrants, it would be capping 5000 asylum seekers. The sooner we cap that number the more capable we will be in processing and removing false asylum seekers....

    • @ericanderson2919
      @ericanderson2919 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you watch the interview? Did you understand what Senator Lankford said? Go back and rewatch he explains his colleagues didn't understand the bill or used false taking points to kill it and help Trump

    • @wendyrbielski2759
      @wendyrbielski2759 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@Waterfiendz Finish the near done Fence, Close the Border from open crossings, they could have done that at any time and avoided all this mess!

  • @gregbrodsky5390
    @gregbrodsky5390 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He needs to be primaried!!! Worst senator in the country!!

  • @FrankMulvaney-x2s
    @FrankMulvaney-x2s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank God the southern govenors have passed open carry. May have to enforce the law ourselves

    • @ilovemytube2010
      @ilovemytube2010 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ever wonder why Melania & Barron are dual citizens. They must pledge allegiance to two countries. Never before has a first Lady pledge to another country. WTF!!

    • @chewy6487
      @chewy6487 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      All talk

    • @gustoworld
      @gustoworld 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Arbitrarily, or with due process of law? I know how much you patriots want to uphold the constitution. However, you did have a chance to pass a bipartisan border bill, how did that go?

    • @Y3S1919
      @Y3S1919 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@gustoworld ahhh yes, they uphold the constitution alright (unless they need to apply it to Trump lmao)

    • @aditya_on_youtube
      @aditya_on_youtube 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Y3S1919Well said

  • @gregbrodsky5390
    @gregbrodsky5390 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Worst senator in the country!!

    • @rickw3243
      @rickw3243 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, that would be Bernie Sanders.

  • @joec6698
    @joec6698 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Trying to blame this on Trump-- while somehow not blaming him? Wow you're a weasel!

    • @ericanderson2919
      @ericanderson2919 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He wasn't lying

    • @wendyrbielski2759
      @wendyrbielski2759 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ericanderson2919 Harris already had the Authority to finish the Fence, one the Bordsd, Process Asylum Seekers before entering.

    • @angelwkw3
      @angelwkw3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So Republicans killed their own bill for what reason? Even Fox points it out 😂 y'all defend that clown til the day he dies.

  • @Matt-lq7gd
    @Matt-lq7gd หลายเดือนก่อน

    so youre blaming trump while hes NOT in office for this? LOL man thats pathetic. Hey guess what Biden can end this at literally any moment but wont.

    • @angelwkw3
      @angelwkw3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How? Lol are you confused? TRUMP got his Republican senator buddies to kill their own bill so he can use the border as campaign leverage. This isn't hard to follow.
      You MAGAs have no idea how the government works. Still think Harris oversaw the border as some mythical czar 😂

    • @650beema
      @650beema 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      They Literally said trump made a Phone call to kill this bill, what part of that are you not sure is Trumps fault? Are you confused?

  • @johnbanks-ml8wt
    @johnbanks-ml8wt 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Oklahoma depends on migrant workers and lankford knows this but it takes money not just closing the border will work

    • @TannisHenriksen
      @TannisHenriksen 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm not understanding your plan or insight. You need. Migrant workers.. (That want those jobs.) First off. You don't need the gangs and the rest. Millions. Do you need 30 million? (yes!30!) in Oklahoma? If we've got this level of failure in congress your migrant workforce is never going to be valued. At this time we need to save, let alone work. World health is going to come in.. They'll pass whatever and they'll lock us down worse than covid. You won't need workers then eh? So I get the migrant workers but you get the wrong ones and they'll end your state. End it. That's what they're here for. Trying to get some idea of what to do.. Us doing.. Not them. They won't. Look.. Stay strong. Stay safe. I hope we can somewhat normalize soon💪🇺🇸🆘

    • @johnbanks-ml8wt
      @johnbanks-ml8wt 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TannisHenriksen you think Oklahoma is only sate that needs them come on ok we just sent 36 billion across the ocean to Israel which has free education at all levels and free healthcare retirement well before our mandatory minimum most of there workers who do shit work are imported out of country at slave wages and no guarantee of any citizenship so you'd rather spend our tax dollars abroad to a country with little if any strategic value instead of investing it in our neighbors wow that's some shitty math