I-56 - THIS IS HOW ALL SUBMARINES SHOULD HAVE BEEN!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 38

  • @burt591
    @burt591 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Torpedoes reloading in 30 seconds on a thing that can get at 2.5 km from you without being detected is insane

  • @EgyptOverseerbb
    @EgyptOverseerbb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Interesting how the Sub seems fairer when played like a DD...

    • @thomasneal9291
      @thomasneal9291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So... no need for subs, since there are already dds

  • @ImRandomDude
    @ImRandomDude 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Sorry, but I almost fell asleep twice. You know that sudden fall of head

  • @Lancista
    @Lancista 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    *That Junkyard is so CHONKY!* 🤣

  • @thomasneal9291
    @thomasneal9291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "This is how subs should be."
    ...but it didn't just immediately explode on start and get sent back to port. I'm confused.

  • @jbatina
    @jbatina 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Completely agree about homing torps

  • @matej2733
    @matej2733 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I curently have only U-69 and fact, that you dont have unguided torpedos on tier 6 is really poore madness 🤣

    • @RamonInNZ
      @RamonInNZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Very few homing torpedo were used in WW2. They should also nerf speed above and below water.

  • @thegeneral123
    @thegeneral123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oh no! Sea Sausages!

  • @allensanders5535
    @allensanders5535 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    you have reached a new low CV's wasn't low enough.

  • @038alpha
    @038alpha 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    YES ! I-56 feels so much more rewarding !
    You get outspotted by DDs even at periscope depth so you can't pull of the usual early DD devstrike, you are huge, not manovrable and you go at 10kts underwater
    plus guided torps are only 6km
    but the terrible thing about it is you can't fight other subs

    • @RamonInNZ
      @RamonInNZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      WW2 sub to sub was on the surface only - remember there were no underwater missiles yet.

  • @kolla5415
    @kolla5415 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just wait for WG too add subs for steel and coal just like they did with CVs. Oh boy...

  • @robertshaver4432
    @robertshaver4432 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Agreed with all!

  • @michaelkendall662
    @michaelkendall662 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    no way it should have given them a 30 kt speed

    • @ZombieWolf2113
      @ZombieWolf2113 ปีที่แล้ว

      its because other ships are faster alredy if the subs were real life speed they could never keep up, its fast speed to keep up with the fast paced arcade nature of wows

  • @leslieuttley9042
    @leslieuttley9042 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I agree all homing torps should be removed - BBs stand no chance against them.

  • @mindentmegtettertem5130
    @mindentmegtettertem5130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi, could we see your build?

  • @collegestudent6071
    @collegestudent6071 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I prefer S-189 over I-56. It's in general a better sub, though the challenge I-56 gameplay presents also makes it fun to play. Gets outspotted by all DD's, short and slow dive time, no sub surveillance and limited hydrophone either makes you stay back, or be a short lived shotgun ambusher.

  • @MrAlbutiu
    @MrAlbutiu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👌.

  • @xLuna18
    @xLuna18 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's a shame you have to gamble at wg-casino to get I56...

  • @rouleslite5312
    @rouleslite5312 ปีที่แล้ว

    But to against other subs, hell no

  • @sfcsabo1319
    @sfcsabo1319 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Let’s Go Subs! A ship even Brandon could play! Be like Brandon…play submarines!

    • @thomasneal9291
      @thomasneal9291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Leave it to morons to want to receive political feedback in a thread about video games

  • @chrisohanlon69
    @chrisohanlon69 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does this geezer do ship reviews?

    • @guntherultraboltnovacrunch5248
      @guntherultraboltnovacrunch5248 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Trenlass a geezer? bah.

    • @trenlass809
      @trenlass809  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what is even a geezer XD

    • @Hastur_the_King_in_Yellow
      @Hastur_the_King_in_Yellow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@trenlass809 A grumpy old man. Jingles, essentially.

    • @chrisohanlon69
      @chrisohanlon69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Hastur_the_King_in_Yellow Actually that's an americanization of the british version which has a meaning similar to "bloke","guy" or "person". I was using it in the original british sense - person

    • @guntherultraboltnovacrunch5248
      @guntherultraboltnovacrunch5248 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@trenlass809 A Geezer is what Flambass is destined to become.