Dodging Alliance Torps - These Things Are Like Taxes

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 568

  • @Flamuu
    @Flamuu  ปีที่แล้ว +208

    After testing this extensively, if you don't have hydro, you can't wait until you see the torps to DCP the ping (like you do against other subs), because the torps are so stealthy and the homing is so aggressive, by the time you see them it's already too late. That 21:30 cross-torp ambush really says it all, DCPing the ping after seeing the torps wouldn't have saved me, as the ambush was already setup. The torps also do this crazy turning around to chase you, as shown here: clips.twitch.tv/LongScrumptiousAardvarkKeyboardCat-iK6TCowlT0-Cx8N3

    • @lewiskellett5654
      @lewiskellett5654 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      It's clearly a skill issue

    • @AdamtheRed-
      @AdamtheRed- ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Not sure what the problem is. Just submerge or take off. You clearly need to find a better way to interact with submarines. Clearly.

    • @robertanderson6929
      @robertanderson6929 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      And now you know why I got banned from their FORUMS and quit playing. I was literally asking how I was expected to fight a submarine who knew what he was doing and the moderators jumped in and basically said, "Git gud scrub!" Then they banned me from asking any further questions.
      You MUST turn in and try to shorten the distance as that is the only possible way to shake the torps. Trying to run from them just lets him send salvo after salvo up your wake that you cannot dodge. The torps are just too fast and maneuverable to run from. And using DCP before you are flooding is suicide because you are going to flood out if you do. If you team does not focus the sub down before he sinks you then you're toast. If the sub doesn't get you then you'll end up spotted and broadside to the enemy while dodging and they'll get you.

    • @MERLK2
      @MERLK2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Clearly you didn`t try the following simple manouver(s) to deal with submarines in WoWS.
      a) press ALT+F4
      b) optional - check your antivirus system and block the wargaming client in it, if it has that function
      c) uninstall WoWS Client
      But jokes aside - it hurts how they ruined the game. And then seemingly went ... how can we ruin it even harder/more

    • @emperorlelouch8515
      @emperorlelouch8515 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      But Kitakami is too much apparently lmao

  • @eugenekrabsalt
    @eugenekrabsalt ปีที่แล้ว +580

    I like how the slow homing torps are advertised as a weakness, while in reality it just makes their turning circle tighter...

    • @OverlordAntares
      @OverlordAntares ปีที่แล้ว +44

      It's like an aircraft doing a 9g turn at 600 knots vs 400 knots. The turning circle is tighter.

    • @zacharyjackson1829
      @zacharyjackson1829 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      "We gave it slow torps so you could watch and ponder over your death while wondering why you play our game. Now please give us a hundred dollars for the experience!" 😁

    • @jaywerner8415
      @jaywerner8415 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Where is THAT advertised? Homing torps are HARDLY slow quite the opposite in fact. Just like with US dreadnaughts people complain how slow they are but fail to mention how easily they can turn. Thus is the law of hydrodynamics and/or laws of physics.

    • @Joshua-fi4ji
      @Joshua-fi4ji ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@jaywerner8415 I have Alliance and the homing torps do 44 knots with speed boosts. Most ships can just outrun them, especially if 7km or more away (they're slower than Blacks torps). They only work well against targets close to you or pushing into you.
      The unguided torps (7km) are better in my experience and do a lot more damage.
      It's still powerful boat.

    • @jaywerner8415
      @jaywerner8415 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Joshua-fi4ji 44 knots? Wow that is slow. No wonder they can turn so well, speaking from XP from the US and German subs their torps go twice that speed. Whats the range of the homing torps out of curiosity? Probably about 10-12kms i take it?
      Damage is the whole point of the unguided torps. Frankly i wish the torpedo speeds of tech line Subs where SWAPED, cus besides damage the "ALT" torps are worse in every way (on paper). Cus oh my god a torpedo that goes less then 70 knots is just PAINFUL to watch.

  • @SelikBzdy
    @SelikBzdy ปีที่แล้ว +384

    It feels like you are trying to fight a gen-4 fighter with homing missiles while driving a grossery cart. So much fun.

    • @Sky_Guy
      @Sky_Guy ปีที่แล้ว +85

      Me shopping for torps in my Grossery Kartfurst.

    • @Onezmhu
      @Onezmhu ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@Sky_Guy lmfao nice one

    • @tpark2316
      @tpark2316 ปีที่แล้ว

      He’s right, this sub is very gross

    • @malamutekid8871
      @malamutekid8871 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@Sky_Guy I'm actually dead from this 😂

    • @김형섭-b9t
      @김형섭-b9t ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@Sky_Guywhat a joke

  • @annex3762
    @annex3762 ปีที่แล้ว +180

    Even torpedoes in Star Trek being hundreds of years in the future dont have that kind of homing capability. WW2 tech truly was state of the art!

    • @AdamtheRed-
      @AdamtheRed- ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It always seemed like ST torpedoes were point and shoot, i dont think they home. Except that one in The Undiscovered Country that was specifically modified to seek the Bird of Preys exhaust.

    • @firesb7791
      @firesb7791 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Honestly this is pretty much late cold War tier homing, a torpedo being avoided, circling around and still hitting the ship is the sort of thing you'd except from the ADCAP, not WW2

    • @GoldenSkies061
      @GoldenSkies061 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@AdamtheRed- Torps in star trek do home in, I believe there's a few other episodes that mention them being guided.

    • @glennv3176
      @glennv3176 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@firesb7791 real life torpedoes can't intercept, they can only track (home) - This is technology that does not exist in 2023, not in torpedoes anyway.

    • @firesb7791
      @firesb7791 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@glennv3176 Actually, I believe some of the modern NATO torpedoes post-ADCAP do have the capability to predict trajectory and target accordingly, apparently the capabilities of British submarines especially are pretty insane

  • @beshtaa
    @beshtaa ปีที่แล้ว +108

    EXACTLY what we all wanted. Active player numbers are prooving it too. Everyone is happy.

    • @AdamtheRed-
      @AdamtheRed- ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Its totally true! I was so stoked with where the game is headed that i stopped playing. Now I'm super sad. (I also dont understand the difference between my emotions)

    • @6uiti
      @6uiti ปีที่แล้ว

      Played back in 12.0 wanted to play with new ita cruiser buffs and take out Gorizia and Kronstadt, after seeing this game can stay unupdated. 20k battles they destroyed my most relaxing game. Im sad too ngl 😢

  • @kagakai7729
    @kagakai7729 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    The torpedo knows where it is at all times

    • @nonowgoaway
      @nonowgoaway ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It knows where it is because it knows where it isn't.

  • @kal_mwt7372
    @kal_mwt7372 ปีที่แล้ว +182

    And this is on the LIVE Server... Who is testing this and thinks this is fine.

    • @AdamtheRed-
      @AdamtheRed- ปีที่แล้ว +16

      They've fired the testing staff and used that money to buy back shares in their stock.

    • @i_nameless_i-jgsdf
      @i_nameless_i-jgsdf ปีที่แล้ว +14

      The same idiots who thought IJN CLs were overpowered so they got it nerfed countless time before they hit live server...

    • @Momofukudoodoowindu
      @Momofukudoodoowindu ปีที่แล้ว +17

      The 16 year olds they hired from the last dev video we saw.

    • @peepostinger2790
      @peepostinger2790 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Couple of my friends were CSTs and gave up after some time. Entire CST server provided feedback and ways to improve for ijn cl and performance of subs. You wanna know what wg did? threw it into papershredder and REMOVED ,,FEEDBACK" SECTION FROM CST DC entirely. Now the only feedback, people can provide is ,,do you like the *insert new test ship name* ? 1)yes 2) No

    • @Lt_Voss
      @Lt_Voss ปีที่แล้ว

      @@i_nameless_i-jgsdf Wait what, that's why I think I'm having a poor time in them? I haven't played in years (stopped shortly after the carrier rework), but my father still plays and wanted to play with me, so I jumped through every hoop imaginable to install this thing on my linux computer (a freaking nightmare), then took a look at what I could do in the game while I play with my pops, and saw shiny new IJN CLs. And now you're telling me they've been nerfed into the ground before I even got a chance to play them?!

  • @mondinik2378
    @mondinik2378 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    I like how with CVs you need at least another ally to create a cross-fire. This thing creates cross-fires by itself.

    • @kaollachan
      @kaollachan ปีที่แล้ว +1

      and then Double alliance game ... enjoy XD

  • @顾羽-i9n
    @顾羽-i9n ปีที่แล้ว +231

    this kind of torp should be called an anti-ship missile.

    • @grandgao3984
      @grandgao3984 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Trust me anti-ship missiles weren't that good a few decades ago, even now only the best could come close to dat

    • @malamutekid8871
      @malamutekid8871 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      torpedoes are actually considered underwater missiles. the only difference is that they move in 2 dimensions rather than 3.

    • @OverlordAntares
      @OverlordAntares ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@malamutekid8871Depends on the era of torpedoes. Modern torps like the MK48 or Spearfish move 3D like missiles.

    • @malamutekid8871
      @malamutekid8871 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@OverlordAntares yeah, more modern ones do. the older ones usually move in two dimensions, especially if we're only talking about World of warships

    • @ma6netho
      @ma6netho ปีที่แล้ว

      anti wows players, more like, only cv and sub players left soon

  • @antraxxslingshots
    @antraxxslingshots ปีที่แล้ว +55

    I lost it the moment he said: "This is live"
    How did THIS pass testing?
    WTF?

    • @antraxxslingshots
      @antraxxslingshots ปีที่แล้ว

      @Mathew Long But they want and need to earn money right?

    • @Myomer104
      @Myomer104 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@antraxxslingshots They get it by people wanting to buy the overpowered shit. Once any purchase is made by a player, WG stops caring about what they do. They've already got the money.

  • @MetalMachine131
    @MetalMachine131 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Well, I predicted missiles for the game, I just didnt think they would be under water...

    • @Arisudev
      @Arisudev ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same

  • @estoyaqui5386
    @estoyaqui5386 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A former clan-mate sent me the link to this video. I see, stop playing was a good decision.
    Last year I walked away from a 400-ship port, a year worth of premium time and abandoned the forums. Looking back I ca only shake my head to what WG has done to this game.
    And thank you Flamu, I learned a lot from you back when the game was fun.

  • @madduckuk
    @madduckuk ปีที่แล้ว +24

    This is what will get people back, everyone will want to play this.

    • @nilsl.2445
      @nilsl.2445 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Would be great, think about selling my Account...started playing since the release...but now it is too much for me. Thank the lord I stopped spending money more than a year ago when Subs became a topic. This game and its "development" is a joke. Happy fantasy game. All the best WG. Once I am done I will never ever touch one of your F2P games again. waste of money

  • @taterkaze9428
    @taterkaze9428 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Torps that out-turn DDs? Pure magic. WoWS turning into a fantasy game.

    • @hipperguy1654
      @hipperguy1654 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ​@@AKUJIVALDO vatnik cope trash

    • @AKUJIVALDO
      @AKUJIVALDO ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hipperguy1654 one MSM consumer detected. Ukraine is "winning" one year later...with their tanks in Moscow as Elentsky said... Oh wait... LOL

    • @vicamu541
      @vicamu541 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AKUJIVALDO just like russians coming back out of ukraine.. fantasy game

    • @JohnDiabol
      @JohnDiabol ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, technically torpedoes like that did exist. Although they didn't come around until the 1960's.
      No destroyer in the world can dodge a Mk48 torpedo for very long.
      There were homing torpedoes in WW2 as well, that homed in on the sound of a ship's engine and propellers.

    • @sabrewolf4129
      @sabrewolf4129 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That happened when they added the ARP and Hentai crap to the game.

  • @andrash9433
    @andrash9433 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    About a month ago I finally got tilted enough to delete my WG account that I registered in 2015 due to CVs, subs, and forced 2-tier-difference matchmakings (rendering T9 ships unplayable). At first I had regrets, but thanks to your videos those feelings are quickly fading.
    15K battles played, 700 EUR spent, 59.8% solo wr reached (too bad, i really wanted that 60, oh well). Rest in Hell.

    • @Dbars19
      @Dbars19 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      no one cares.

    • @3men219
      @3men219 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You could've just sold your account, at least make some of that cash back

    • @RedShocktrooperRST
      @RedShocktrooperRST ปีที่แล้ว

      @@3men219 Who the fuck would buy a world of warships account lmao?

  • @Not_Laci
    @Not_Laci ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Man this is so depressing, and the fact that wg said this is fine, is just baffling.

  • @gothia1715
    @gothia1715 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Sick gameplay WG created there. 10/10

  • @setskov2900
    @setskov2900 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Ah yes subs hunting dds, how the tables have turned...

  • @NerothLoD
    @NerothLoD ปีที่แล้ว +53

    WTF. These are like MK 48's. I guess they implemented torpedoes from 2023, but everything else is WWII/Cold War era. Solid balancing.

    • @ymustitho6343
      @ymustitho6343 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Ww2 naval game btw

    • @firesb7791
      @firesb7791 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I knew from the beginning of submarines that those "one turn" homing tops would end up being ADCAPs, only I thought it would be a Soviet sub to get them first

    • @velocity790
      @velocity790 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Since they're British.... Maybe closer to the Mk24 Tigerfish

    • @xmlthegreat
      @xmlthegreat ปีที่แล้ว

      @@firesb7791 same. I was like, " eventually, these things will turn around and chase you for next 10-15 mins and they will be fitted on an Alfa class"

    • @dodle1769
      @dodle1769 ปีที่แล้ว

      They give subs/carriers modern things, but all the countermeasures we have against them are all ww2. There not gonna give us 2023 levels of AA/ASW :P

  • @rigeol9425
    @rigeol9425 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    That’s no more making me angry, i’m just so sad to see this game i had so much fun in being bucher like that

    • @AdamtheRed-
      @AdamtheRed- ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm right there with you. Five years and thousands of hours wasted on this game that I used to love.

  • @johnvga6239
    @johnvga6239 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    21:37 guided javelin missiles 💀

  • @berndberndsen5680
    @berndberndsen5680 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The more I see of subs and superships, the happier I am just relaxing in operations.

    • @kaollachan
      @kaollachan ปีที่แล้ว

      i just wish to have operation for sub ( no needing a freacking division)....

  • @ConspiracyKhan
    @ConspiracyKhan ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Damn, I wish my modern seeking missiles in War Thunder could track a target as well as these WW2 torpedos.

    • @Chris249224
      @Chris249224 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ewww WT

    • @liquidgoose1518
      @liquidgoose1518 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wish my AMRAAM BVR missiles in DCS were so effective

  • @Bane_Diesel
    @Bane_Diesel ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I love how the hardest thing to counter a sub in is a dd's depth charges. Like in my Halland it shoots them out of the front so if I stupidly run over the MF I have no counter I have to completely turn around. I also love that the most dangerous thing for a sub in real life was a dd but in this game dds get hunted by subs.

    • @AdamGibbyMC2012
      @AdamGibbyMC2012 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Right? How about a depth charge has the potential of knocking out the ability to dive.

    • @skarhabekgreyrukh8601
      @skarhabekgreyrukh8601 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      battleship is the real sub counter in this game

    • @Bane_Diesel
      @Bane_Diesel ปีที่แล้ว

      @@skarhabekgreyrukh8601 except when you only have a 4km range to drop charges on them.

    • @skarhabekgreyrukh8601
      @skarhabekgreyrukh8601 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Bane_Diesel 4 km is Cruiser range. Battleship is around 10km. Are you even play?

    • @Bane_Diesel
      @Bane_Diesel ปีที่แล้ว

      @@skarhabekgreyrukh8601 lower tier bb im talking about where new players don't know how to just dodge. I am human.

  • @justapanda7371
    @justapanda7371 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    The only thing I can think is wargaming isn’t making enough keeping the game going but they can’t just shut it down because of the backlash they’d get from those who have already sunk so much time and money into it. Instead they are making the game so unplayable that people will voluntarily quit until they can say they have to shut it down due to an insufficient player base.

    • @hond654
      @hond654 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, this is a very good point. They have cashed enough, time to shut down.

    • @robertanderson6929
      @robertanderson6929 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I think they are still making a profit but the curve is flattened and they lost a ton of money divesting themselves from Russia. Although they might have skipped out on some loans if the Russian mafia couldn't find them. No their problem is people like me. I'm not buying premium time nor playing the game. And I'm not the only one. They need lots of people paying for premium time to keep the game going. They thought Submarines would be a huge source of revenue but that's not likely to be the case. For everyone who might buy a Premium Sub, when available, an other group of players, like me, will stop playing altogether. In the end I suspect Subs to be a net loss and given the shaky ground WG is standing upon then in two or three more quarters they might be in serious trouble if not bankrupt.

    • @Sira_Kackavalj
      @Sira_Kackavalj ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@robertanderson6929 Plenty of Whales and degenerates both in Warships and Tanks to keep them going without caring about the playerbase

    • @klegdixal3529
      @klegdixal3529 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Sira_Kackavalj somebody needs to pad the server numbers to keep the game going. 3vs3 with a CV and 2 subs won't be fun even for a griefer.

    • @emmaquarzpeng
      @emmaquarzpeng ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They are doing perfectly fine, taifun-leader here with 65% - just quit the game ^^

  • @alfredneumann4332
    @alfredneumann4332 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    in the hinden game when the announcer said: "the battle begins!" only thing i could think of, it's only a batle if both sides stand a chance

  • @arsk5127
    @arsk5127 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Well I think it fits perfectly, since in 2023 WG/Lesta still thinks that people have to 1) suffer from some type of ship/mechanic, to 2) go and buy the same ship/mechanic to inflict suffering to others. Apparently just having fun and supporting the devs for making a good game to have fun in, is not an option. Apparently WG/Lesta know better, especially given the fact that online on falling for the past 5 years.

  • @g.leefinley1024
    @g.leefinley1024 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    “A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.”

  • @KaguyasBeat
    @KaguyasBeat ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Based on testing results and community feedback, we have found the Just Dodge mechanic to be a blatant exploit at avoiding homing torpedoes, hindering submarine gameplay. Therefore: We have decided to sell a solution to this problem for all of our lovely sub players. Happy Hunting Captains!
    Love,
    Wargaming

  • @TallulahSoie
    @TallulahSoie ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1:32
    "You arrogant ass. You've killed us!"

  • @b-spiral8314
    @b-spiral8314 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I haven't even thought about wows for months till flamu suddenly showed up in my YT recommended. I'm surprised you guys still play. Once you break the habit of logging in, eventually all the frustration and itch to play go away. Then you forget about the game entirely.

  • @SofaKingA
    @SofaKingA ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is in my top 5 favorite Flamu vids of all time.

  • @benb6417
    @benb6417 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't."
    It's longer than that, but you get the idea...
    Now you can get crosstorped by the SAME submarine!

  • @antraxxslingshots
    @antraxxslingshots ปีที่แล้ว +14

    No idea what you were talking about, the Sub Player was clearly superior :D
    The crosstorp against the Kiew :D

  • @ricardoviera7713
    @ricardoviera7713 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    imagine doing all those turns to avoid a spam of torpedoes while being shot by a Yamato and company, xD

  • @apizzapls
    @apizzapls ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Bruh this ship can literally create its own crossfire wtf

  • @sparky1595
    @sparky1595 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That Kiev clip truly is a clip of all time

  • @deleted_215
    @deleted_215 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nobody:
    WoWs “torpedoes”: *Highway to the Danger Zone starts blasting in the background*

  • @davidecarucci1073
    @davidecarucci1073 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those things turn better than aim 9x in a fluid that is 800 times denser

  • @MajikMidnight
    @MajikMidnight ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Just to put a number on it, the minimum homing range for Alliance on Destroyers is 110m for a single ping and 70m for a double ping, on Cruisers it's 650m and 330m and for Battleships it's 900m and 750m. So add that to their extreme manoeuvrability and low reload and you get a full on WG moment.

  • @bachelorchownowwithflavor3712
    @bachelorchownowwithflavor3712 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have a technique for dodging homing torps that is 100% guaranteed to work every time: uninstall and play a better game.

  • @filippomunari8147
    @filippomunari8147 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    during ww2 attack a destroyer in a submarine was considered suicidal, in the thinking men’s action game a submarine can surface 500 mt in the port side of a yamato and eat a broadside without give a fuck

    • @OverlordAntares
      @OverlordAntares ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Destroyers were the natural predators of submarines, but in this game, they prey on DD's. I'm glad i stopped playing this shit a year ago.

  • @RoycePhillips
    @RoycePhillips ปีที่แล้ว +2

    2:44 5:55 21:35 These are certified Cold Waters moments. If this is a T8 British, imagine if WeeGee develops a Russian tree ending in a T11 Oscar-class with this homing BS.

  • @427Arbok
    @427Arbok ปีที่แล้ว +1

    People were joking about WeeGee adding missiles next, but it seems like they already have

  • @_lime.
    @_lime. ปีที่แล้ว

    I ran into an Alliance in the Hipper yesterday. Spotted him on the surface. Saw a wave of tops and managed to damage control the first ping, still ate a couple tops. What I didn't know was that he had launched those a while ago. Second ping came in along with another wave of torps. I couldn't do anything. It was more than enough to kill me.
    30 second reload vs a minute plus for damage control. People complained about German sub torp spam but the U-190 has a 58 second reload, nearly double.

  • @Andreas_T
    @Andreas_T ปีที่แล้ว +5

    With this sub and torps we are progressing from "just dodge" to "just die". Seems reasonable in WoWs lately.

  • @pendragooon
    @pendragooon ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I will constantly rage quick once an Allinace enters battle.

  • @tramapolean
    @tramapolean ปีที่แล้ว

    Best advert for a new premium ship ever! ;-)

  • @jadpho1380
    @jadpho1380 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Torpedo knows where it is because it knows where it isn’t

  • @rebelsoldier8013
    @rebelsoldier8013 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    OMG that cross drop on the Kiev needs to be clipped

  • @j_ro
    @j_ro ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this is what happens when WG decides that "Just Dodge" has become too effective

  • @Arclite02
    @Arclite02 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ah, yes... The Mk.48 ADCAP/CBASS, the torpedo system that won WW2...

  • @matthewphelps5136
    @matthewphelps5136 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I imagine the weegee discussion went something like this.
    Weegee: Ok bois, we need new ships in the game......Go.
    Underling: Submarines sir?
    Weegee: I love it. Now, really blow my mind. How do they work?
    Underling: Homing torps sir?
    Weegee: Give that man a raise.

  • @Drunk_n_Sailr
    @Drunk_n_Sailr ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When "just dodge" was too effective

  • @AlekTrev006
    @AlekTrev006 ปีที่แล้ว

    I picture, one of these days, at WG-HQ, there’ll be that moment like from the one Terminator movie… where a VP reports to CEO Kislyi about cratered Player Numbers… CEO looks up…stares straight ahead, and says… “We have destroyed OURSELVES..!!?” 😂

  • @jesperviktorsson8027
    @jesperviktorsson8027 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    IRIS-T. Misses but comes back and tries again

  • @jammers195
    @jammers195 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "The Torpedo knows where it is, because it knows where it isn't "

  • @nooblangpoo
    @nooblangpoo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kiev: "JUST DODGE!? WHERE WILL I DODGE?"

  • @mr.skully8787
    @mr.skully8787 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Extremely fun and engaging

  • @OwenAce
    @OwenAce ปีที่แล้ว

    The torpedo knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't.

  • @davidwhitfield6025
    @davidwhitfield6025 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's ridiculous. Why do the Brits have such incredible torps? You know the Sub that sank the Belgrano in the Falkland War did it with non homing torps because even then the homing mechanism on the torps was faulty. And while no one else will likely care the Alliance is going to have it all over other subs as well.

  • @mastersanada
    @mastersanada ปีที่แล้ว

    The fucking Kiev clip is it. That shit was so funny and unexpected.

  • @scheimong
    @scheimong ปีที่แล้ว +12

    At this point they might as well give them wire-guided Mk48 adcaps. I mean, the pincer trickshot at the end is the kind of sht I do in Cold Waters with my Seawolf 🤣

    • @memyshelfandeye318
      @memyshelfandeye318 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's exactly what they did. They only forgot to put the correct name on them.

  • @sugoi4845
    @sugoi4845 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it's just like dodging air-to-air missiles, except you are in a ww2 four-engine bomber and don't have countermeasures

  • @GA_Thrawn445
    @GA_Thrawn445 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thank god we the silent majority wanted this Kappa

  • @Manol6325
    @Manol6325 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "That is the dumbest thing i've seen" this sentence describes every single patch in this game since 2018

  • @septia101
    @septia101 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sub is firing AIM-9 sidewinders....

  • @Gunni1972
    @Gunni1972 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just wanna see their Unicorn-proof Tutorial mission on "How to avoid Submarine Torps".

  • @iome7264
    @iome7264 ปีที่แล้ว

    the torpedo knows where it is...

  • @architsingh9861
    @architsingh9861 ปีที่แล้ว

    The torpedo knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the torpedo from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the torpedo is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the torpedo must also know where it was.
    The acoustic homing scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the torpedo has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

  • @kaikai200
    @kaikai200 ปีที่แล้ว

    The none guided torp are terrifying when you consider how fast you can reload those things , anything tier 8 get smashed and not in the way of one shot but they are basically done for at that point
    and the irony is the biggest threat are actually BB's ASW (high damage), because if DD try to use their ASW , just shotgun them .

  • @arkenthor8106
    @arkenthor8106 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I remember that the homing was supposed to stop at a certain distance from the targetted ship. Obviously this is no longer a thing

    • @EvoraGT430
      @EvoraGT430 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just 60 meters for this POS. Way to kill the game, idiot WG.

    • @AdamtheRed-
      @AdamtheRed- ปีที่แล้ว

      True, but for DDs the homing-stop distance is about half the length of the DD. Something like 200 meters. Just submerge comrade.

    • @KalleKantola
      @KalleKantola ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AdamtheRed- Alliance specifically has improved homing which is around half the normal distance or better. With DDs 1 ping wont stop homing until 220m (normally 440m), with 2 pings it wont stop homing until 70m (normally 220m).

  • @FrederickKoehlmann
    @FrederickKoehlmann ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm curious if the torps would follow you around an island?
    Would love to see a game where you're commanding the sub against an entire team. Seems the sub might win! ;) That would show how OP it is.

  • @pzkw8606
    @pzkw8606 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    when it is just easier to dodge the ping than the torps

  • @skyalan2147
    @skyalan2147 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was already playing less and less over the past 6 months but I think this is the final nail in the coffin for me with this game. I loved this game but they are just killing all my will to play this game.

  • @italomorais9424
    @italomorais9424 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Idk what you guys are complaining about it. I always had trouble landing torpedoes , and now wargaming is offering me the chance to be a super unicum, I just need to pay the totally reasonable price of 47K doubloons.

  • @AdamGibbyMC2012
    @AdamGibbyMC2012 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The only counter for this would be to make DCP allowable every 20 seconds. This would negate any sort of fire ship build. I’m baffled truly baffled.

  • @theamazingmikej
    @theamazingmikej ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The sub apologists on NA forums - "This is fine, just install Advance Torpedo Marker."

    • @EvoraGT430
      @EvoraGT430 ปีที่แล้ว

      They cannot play surface ships, that's why.

  • @auxityne
    @auxityne ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm glad to see the Ace Combat 04 version of the QAAM is now in boatgame.

  • @bonus225
    @bonus225 ปีที่แล้ว

    *lyrics of that old american film about workind principle of AIM missile, with all words "missile" changed into "torpedo"*

  • @gstormcz
    @gstormcz ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you remember most of Ww2 sub torps were 25-45knots, unguided, min arming distance few hundred m, getting usual few degree spread, many of them just dud, lost speed, course or depth, not activated due to steep angle hit.
    This is arcade game, but only for newest released boats, usually for doublons.
    I played T6 subs and I don't think they OP If you send those unguided torps, most of them miss, once you ping ships, you get focused by ASW. Best chance to react on match progress you have surfaced to run fast, CVs and other stuff incl enemy sub sonar threat you, when CV air crafts come close, you have to guess your moment to dive avoid being spotted.
    I would say at least Cachalot and U69 are decently balanced, I had no super match, either ended up with few pings and torps landed for 15K total dmg, or killed 2ships at best. Quite average results I would get with other ships too.
    But I found few player accounts, who simply sck in normal ships with 40WR, but excelled in both CVs and subs have there +15 to +20 higher WR, getting their average simply above 50 (I have no better results in CVs and subs too vs BB/DD/Cruisers).
    Maybe those guys just played those ships during "happy times" early release and few patches until balancing update.
    But this homing feature is still ridiculous.
    You simply can't hunt down subs on early spot/attempt. It has potential to be exploited.

  • @AnaneKue
    @AnaneKue ปีที่แล้ว

    8:35 Hahahha even the captain voice is raging with this shiiterry wg had done😂

  • @Miggs757
    @Miggs757 ปีที่แล้ว

    Clearly, fun is achieved with this boat.

  • @memyshelfandeye318
    @memyshelfandeye318 ปีที่แล้ว

    M48 ADCAP in a game with 1940 ships ... marvellous.
    Each day I'm more glad I deinstalled last year :-)

  • @rantanplan178
    @rantanplan178 ปีที่แล้ว

    What this video ignores entirely, is the fact that even Alliance can't ping like no tomorrow in a real battle. IF BBs use their ASW at least a little smart, they will bring down Alliance relatively quickly, due to its HP pool. Its a submarine in the end. It also "only" has 6km sub-surveillance. So other submarines can be of danger for it as well, even when they are submerged as well.
    However, in competitive game modes, subs are going to be insanely strong. Just like with CVs, we have the same rule in effect and that is, "The less surface ships are available, the more effective this ship classes become".
    Also, it doesn't neglect the fact that this class even further promotes static game play, were everything bigger than a small destroyer, is hardly going to leave spawn, simply as everyone pushing will get focused down incredibly quickly, by all the domains in the game (Air, surface, submerged). Why WG wants to push its game into this direction is beyond me. Let's see whether the upcoming ASW changes (alt-fire-mode) introduce some sort of relieve.

  • @Burusagi
    @Burusagi ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Imagine having to go and literally smack this thing with a melee attack as a DD.

  • @Sleep-is-overrated
    @Sleep-is-overrated ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Congratulations, Mk. 48 ADCAPs are now a thing in WOWS. I would say have fun but the only one having fun here is the sub

  • @heathermarcoux294
    @heathermarcoux294 ปีที่แล้ว

    So they're throwing Mk.48 ADCAPS at tier 8 ships now... nice!!

  • @user-jm8sy5ox2j
    @user-jm8sy5ox2j ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So basically you have to stay out of torp range of this new sub or there is no way to avoid the torpedoes, but if you go out of torp range you have to go to open water spawn where you get farmed by battleships shooting plane spotted targets or you hide behind islands and get farmed by CVs.
    WG must be competing to see what the most absurd thing is that they can add to the game without it crashing and burning overnight

  • @ryuujunichi7362
    @ryuujunichi7362 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These homing torps are disgusting. How did Wargaming ever thought that these torps were a great addition to the game is a complete mystery to me. I dont think i should be playing the game anymore knowing that the enemy team may have one or even more than 1 Alliance.

  • @able_archer01
    @able_archer01 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, someone complained about subs, and this other guy posted this absolutely amazing defense for subs:
    "...the way you counter it is full stop reverse turn. its easy, take the one torp coming from the left if you must , but 80% of the torps subs fire are easy to dodge. stick next to sonar users and you wont die, when a single ability counters an entire ship line no matter the ship they become very weak, especially when 90% of ships have that counter. you will always have 2-3 in your match."
    Like...does this sound like someone who plays WoWS for more than a few minutes?

  • @xanderdad5898
    @xanderdad5898 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think it wouldnt be so bad if they were closer to glass cannons. It would force the sub player to be very selective about who they choose to attack. Where to decide to set up attacks. The class is so strong, so a good route would be the glass cannon approach. If you get caught once. You're dead.

    • @Arisudev
      @Arisudev ปีที่แล้ว

      A sub was always a glass cannon, historically. They're slow and easily break down.

  • @xhellslegionerx
    @xhellslegionerx ปีที่แล้ว

    this is a work of art

  • @archieforber7201
    @archieforber7201 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wasn’t the whole idea of the cv rework to eliminate one player being able to create cross torping. Now they make a submarine that can do it. There are no words. WTF

  • @WankersCramp69
    @WankersCramp69 ปีที่แล้ว

    When people said they wanted less homing bullshit, Wargaming tutned it up a notch.

  • @Endcsline_2
    @Endcsline_2 ปีที่แล้ว

    WG very optimistic that when I play Gouden I always have Hydro and DCP ready, already expecting the torps, and even then getting rekked because 60 second DCP reload time.
    Against CVs, you can see them from far away and turn in to mitigate damage.
    DD torps I can guesstimate their direction and juke their prediction.
    Subs: homing, even with hydro can barely dodge if I know where they're coming from, also need to dcp to avoid torps damage, if I dpc and still eat a torp, I get a full duration flooding.
    And on close range they can just pop up and shotgun if you aren't either full HP or a maneuverable DD...

  • @mussolinipizza6697
    @mussolinipizza6697 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Playerbase says remove homing torps. What does WeeGee do? New premium sub with enhanced homing.

  • @100thdragoon
    @100thdragoon ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These are just Mk. 48 ADCAPs temporally displaced to WWII.

  • @HAWK...214
    @HAWK...214 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    another nail in the coffin of this game

  • @Canute_
    @Canute_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So they're all about history. It was a game about surface ships, then they decided the fun was over and they introduce CVs and subs, the very things that made surface ships obsolete and just ruuuuuub that in our faces.