Use the Method of Joints and BASIC Physics to Analyze a Truss | Statics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 42

  • @icelordotis
    @icelordotis ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This was amazing, I find that many other videos just talk about tension and compression without any reference as to whether they are talking about forces acting on a member or forces that a member exerts to oppose external forces, which led me to be more confused than when I started. You've reaffirmed my initial intuition of what each force represented. Thank you

    • @INTEGRALPHYSICS
      @INTEGRALPHYSICS  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the forces ON the beam vs the forces BY the beam is always a point of confusion, largely because different instructors / texts handle it differently, sometimes without being expliccit about what they are doing.

  • @ivoryas1696
    @ivoryas1696 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Well _this_ channel seems *_thoroughly_* underrated...
    Might as well sub!

  • @MichaelLaprarie-p4c
    @MichaelLaprarie-p4c 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for making the best video I've seen on this subject. Sharing with my students tomorrow. 🙂

  • @HelloJamesBond
    @HelloJamesBond 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Brilliant explanation on method of joints. I could never quite get this in my structures class but now I've got it, cheers.

  • @vladimircastanon9682
    @vladimircastanon9682 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    AMAZING VIDEO, I love the way you explained tension vs compression of internal forces at the end. Hats off to you sir, please keep making more videos.

  • @finaltouchautodetailingllc
    @finaltouchautodetailingllc ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I enjoy learning from your videos

  • @GryffieTube
    @GryffieTube หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent video, thank you very much indeed. I thought I spotted an error earlier but it was me! Excellent explanantion, thank you!

  • @vaa7236
    @vaa7236 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    perfect video really the only video I could understand anything off of about the method of joints I just didn't understand how you used the Pythagorean theorem to find the force in beam BD

    • @INTEGRALPHYSICS
      @INTEGRALPHYSICS  ปีที่แล้ว

      If you know any two sides of a right triangle you can solve for the 3rd using the pythagorean theorem.

    • @vaa7236
      @vaa7236 ปีที่แล้ว

      thanks your voice sexy btw @@INTEGRALPHYSICS

    • @vaa7236
      @vaa7236 ปีที่แล้ว

      dude it makes so much more sense now how the fuck did I miss that !!!!!!!!@@INTEGRALPHYSICS

  • @smokingsara001
    @smokingsara001 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sorry, I don't get how you got 33.7 degrees. 2^m and 3^m equals 33.7 deg?

  • @babulsy6460
    @babulsy6460 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent 👍, 🙏 from India

  • @fredstevens-e4y
    @fredstevens-e4y 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    From the direction of the forces, it looks like beam BC is under compression, not tension

  • @squadman3376
    @squadman3376 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you. Been framing houses for a long time. Those geometric wobbly trusses do an amazing job when properly braced, blocked and sheathed. Geometry rules . !

    • @INTEGRALPHYSICS
      @INTEGRALPHYSICS  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Buddy of mine was a framer, he always said the walls were like a house of cards till you put the roof on.

  • @stephencrown6697
    @stephencrown6697 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank yiu so much
    Very helpful
    God Bless you

  • @ralphbroeils1760
    @ralphbroeils1760 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's all force/load equilibrium.

  • @terezamaskova9699
    @terezamaskova9699 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How did you get that F(ab)= 90.1N ? I’m getting AB= 66.1N

    • @hunorkosbor9831
      @hunorkosbor9831 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your calculator is in the wrong mode. I had the same problem and I asked chat gpt which gave me 90.1N

    • @sarahdecampo6937
      @sarahdecampo6937 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hunorkosbor9831which mode should it be in!

    • @robgrune3284
      @robgrune3284 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      change the mode to degrees

  • @lhote8988
    @lhote8988 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super. Thanks.

  • @eriedului
    @eriedului หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is member bc a zero force member?

  • @relaxo6209
    @relaxo6209 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there a video showing the forces in bow's notation?

    • @INTEGRALPHYSICS
      @INTEGRALPHYSICS  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. Great suggestion though.

  • @alexts94
    @alexts94 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Immensely helpful, thank you

  • @SaleenJ
    @SaleenJ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What if AB is plastic and BD is steel?

    • @INTEGRALPHYSICS
      @INTEGRALPHYSICS  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that wont change the calculations, but it will affect which member is likely to fail first.

  • @PavelBuravtsov
    @PavelBuravtsov 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it is very hard to imagine in my mind how the wooden beam can actually stretch like a spring and having a tension force...

    • @dandelareye5233
      @dandelareye5233 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The molecules that make up the wooden beam do not touch but are instead held by intermolecular forces of attraction. These intermolecular forces are the results of attractions between charges. The molecules of the wood are similar to two magnets that are attracted to each other. As you try to separate the magnets, there comes a point where there is a gap between the two magnets but they are still close enough to be strongly attracted to one another. This is how the wooden beam can "stretch". Although the "stretches" are molecular in nature.

  • @ByteSizedLife
    @ByteSizedLife 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Talk Tuah

  • @erinbentson-er3ki
    @erinbentson-er3ki ปีที่แล้ว +4

    First

  • @ramlalgajoo2722
    @ramlalgajoo2722 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not very infornative

    • @stephencrown6697
      @stephencrown6697 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not true.
      Quite a lot of help in this video