Unmesh! Do you have any idea how helpful you are to us? I have a client that I did a bunch of product shots for (backpacks and such) that they stuffed with tissues to make them look fuller...and they produced lots of wrinkles of course. They asked me if I could reduce the wrinkles and I said, "Yes, of course"! I had no real idea of how to do it, but I knew that YOU would. Now they think I'm a genius and I may have to raise my day rate! You're the best!
Your are excellent Umesh. You provide each and every information in full of details ,it is bit lengthy but on the other way it enlarged our vision. Thanks a lot.
I've been using Photoshop for at least 15 years, but I've never seen such clarity in teaching development!!! GREAT KUDOS fer ya!! And yeah, I learned a lot!!
You are my hero, I'm serious, this video saved my life, I have a project due tomorrow and the last thing I needed was to get rid of a bunch of wrinkles on a shopping bag, I did not want to redo the photo shoot so I thought to search an easier method and I found it thanks to you! Thank you so freaking much!
you make it so much easier for beginner user like me, who learn photoshop because I want to fix the imperfect of photoshots step by step, but at the same time want to learn the basic idea behind the steps. While others are just telling things to follow without explaining anything, you are giving the simple explanation of why the steps are like those in easy wordings. you are a really good teacher and you are now gaining a new subscriber!
By faaaaar the best teacher of all times ! Your videos are so well explained and it works every time ! Never blocked in the middle of the video because you think about everything while explaining ! I owe you so much !
Your tutorials are by far the best I have watched. I find your tutorials much easier to understand. Thank you so much for putting out clear and easy tutorials to follow.
I've known of Frequency Separation for a few years now, but after watching this, I realise I didn't have a clue. Thank you for helping me fix an issue with deep creases in fabric that I wasn't able to fix previously!
Unmesh, you are a Superstar! Your tutorials are so super useful, this one just saved me hours of work and tons of frustration. Thank you very, very much!
Once again thank you for taken the time out to do these. Your explanation on how to is simple and easy to follow. I do not understand why people have not liked this it makes no sense why you would not like to know a new technique.
It is getting more n more comprehensive right to the bone of it, thanks Unmesh Mr Frequency separation n the beautiful family out there, Have a nice day everyday.
You are so awesome. I knew nothing about PS, and you have been my teacher from the start. I just completed a photo shoot and I edited all of the photos myself in PS and LR. Thank you!
A BIG THANK YOU PIXIMPERFECT. It's working!!! and I have learned a lot from your vid. It feels like attending photoshop class for free. Thank you so much for sharing this knowledge with us. You're the best!!!!!
Just wanted to let you know... that your tutorials are amazing. Your voice is calming, and your videos are so informative. Thank you; thank you; thank you!
You have been a godsend to me. I have always struggles with photos of people. My area has been mostly houses and landscapes but I wanted and needed to learn to do portraits better. This has helped a lot. Now to learn my lighting better
This is absolute magic. Wonderful explanation and this is seriously a life saver. This removes all the wrinkles without changing the texture of the clothing. I love the use of math and science applied to photoshop. Thank you so so much.
thank a lot. you help me to raise my knowledge in photoshop and give me mor tools than my teacher in my Collage. by the way you have beautiful family. God Bless you and your family. thank again g
Oh my God, you just saved me hours of work. I was planning on doing an all-nighter because I thought I will never finish ironing clothes in photoshop :D Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge so selflessly.
This is incredible, I had no idea this could be done. I took this method and turned the "WET" quality up to get faster results on VERY wrinkled clothing. Thank you so much.
YO! i FOUND THIS IS PASSING and this is the best THE BEST tutorial I've seen yet. Period. I'm going to try out a few of your other ones and I just maybe become a member. Keep is simple....keep the explanation easy to follow. This is perfect!!
I very much enjoyed this video, it was explained so well and then you did the same thing over but faster each time! Love that because I feel like I'm able to do it with you easier! Thanks
Great video! And I've seen a lot on Frequency separation. Yours was the clearest! I just used it on a client who had a very bumpy bra on under her t-shirt. Managed to smooth all the bumps out while maintaining good texture on the fabric. Perfect!
There's a nice way to prove there's no difference between the add and subtract way. In your last example of the photo with you and your parents, set the last created layer (Background copy) to the blending mode "difference". It's result is a complete black image, hence there's no difference between the two layers.
Hey there Unmesh! First of all: love your videos! Awesome job with them! I wanted to comment on how you were testing with the subtract vs. add in the Apply Image dialog. You were actually just one step away from completely proving that there is zero difference between the two methods. Recreate your 2 cases, like you did in the video. Then set the blend mode of the bottom version to "Normal", and the version above it to "Subtract". If there were any differences between the two, you would be able to see them as non-black values (lum. greater than 0)...but that doesn't appear to be the case, at least not to the naked eye. I analyzed the exact output of the Subtract operation closer and discovered that there actually IS a very minute difference between the two methods. Here's how you can verify this: create a stamp of the subtracted difference of the two methods to a new layer. Drop the image to 8 bit and then change the image mode to indexed. Now you should have the ability to create an image map and see exactly what values show up in the difference between the two methods. If there was no difference between them, you should only see black...but that wasn't the case for me. Instead, I had 17 colors in my color table. Most were ALMOST black (#010000, #000100, etc), but nonetheless, not actual black. Now that I knew there was a difference, I wanted to be able to visually see what the difference was, in case it was just irrelevant noise. So I backed up in the history so I had a 16 bit image again and applied a Levels adjustment to the stamped layer to see if I could bring out the hidden differences in it. In my case, all I had to do was change the Highlight Input Level from 255 to 3 and voila! It added the needed contrast to see the subtle variations in the stamped layer. A lot of it was noise (which might have just been calculation errors/variations somewhere in Photoshop), but I could definitely make out a distinct outline of my original image, which means there were at least SOME significant differences between the two methods. Just to verify that the differences I was seeing aren't due to calculation differences in Photoshop while performing the Apply Image operation (regardless of which method we use) I did a second Subtract on a new layer and did the above steps to see if there were any pixels other than black (#000000)...and there weren't. So that means that Photoshop performs consistent calculations when applying images this way (which is good!) Sooooo, it looks like there ARE some subtle differences between using Add and Subtract in the Apply Image dialog. But we're talking about differences that you can't even see with the naked eye. As far as I'm concerned, these two methods are pretty much interchangeable--unless someone can demonstrate why they believe differently. Anyway, just thought I would share my test and its results with you in case you wanted to share with your viewers and maybe finally put some of this controversy surrounding this to rest. Cheers my friend! Keep up the great videos!
Thanks for sharing your gift of teaching. I've been using FS for years on skin but never fully understood how worked and had no idea what a powerful tool it can be for other applications. Thank you for your detailed explanation! Worked like a charm.
I have to say , I geek out every time I'm following your instructions. I usually have my own photo up. I find it if I'm personally connected to the photo i'm editing, my mind becomes a sponge. Your technical terms transform into layman terms. I find myself giving outburst of excitement . My wife is not to happy about it, but hey go big or go home right lol. But that term doesn't make sense because I'm at home during the outbursts lmao. Thank you for helping me take my editing to the next level :-)
Oh my ! That's amazing ! I don't really understand what I do (but I sure will watch the other video about the concept behind it), but it works like a charm. THANK YOU !
Thank you so much Unmesh. Awesome tutorial and what a beautiful family you have! Can this technique be done both on wrinkled shirts and skin blemishes in the same photo? Or do I have to create different frequency separation layers for each problem?
Thank you boss for this awesome tutorial..one of my client always gives instructions to remove wrinkles from clothes and really this is awesome helpful tutorial for me...
Nice explanation. I already used an action to do this, but this visual explanation gives more founding to the concept. Thanks! Basically also like in sound design, an oscillator (sine/saw/square) and a LFO (*low frequency oscillator).
Unmesh! Do you have any idea how helpful you are to us? I have a client that I did a bunch of product shots for (backpacks and such) that they stuffed with tissues to make them look fuller...and they produced lots of wrinkles of course. They asked me if I could reduce the wrinkles and I said, "Yes, of course"! I had no real idea of how to do it, but I knew that YOU would. Now they think I'm a genius and I may have to raise my day rate! You're the best!
Hahaha i enjoyed reading this comment! Good for you! :D
yeah i can relate. i am a newby but i can manage to follow this courses. thanks.
Peter, you absolutely made my day! This makes me so happy and I wish you the best :)
And yes, you are a genius! Only a genius can learn this technique!
I'm in the same boat! Retouching product photos and this makes it sooo much easier to smooth out wrinkles!
Umesh bro... you are the best Teacher for PS.... U have improved my PS skills a lot... Thx a lot bro...Again a nice video...Keep ur hard work...
HE TEACHES US SCIENCE AND PHOTOSHOP!!! DAMN BEST PROFESSOR.
The best explanation of the CONCEPT of frequency separation I've heard. Well done.
Your are excellent Umesh. You provide each and every information in full of details ,it is bit lengthy but on the other way it enlarged our vision. Thanks a lot.
You do such a good job of explaining the process because you are so concise. I appreciate you taking your time to produce these videos!
I've been using Photoshop for at least 15 years, but I've never seen such clarity in teaching development!!! GREAT KUDOS fer ya!! And yeah, I learned a lot!!
You are my hero, I'm serious, this video saved my life, I have a project due tomorrow and the last thing I needed was to get rid of a bunch of wrinkles on a shopping bag, I did not want to redo the photo shoot so I thought to search an easier method and I found it thanks to you! Thank you so freaking much!
You make hands down THE BEST PHOTOSHOP VIDEOS! Easy to understand and follow. Straight to the point, but also very very entertaining!
Thank you, Unmesh! Nobody explains things so clearly like you...Thank you so much!
you make it so much easier for beginner user like me, who learn photoshop because I want to fix the imperfect of photoshots step by step, but at the same time want to learn the basic idea behind the steps. While others are just telling things to follow without explaining anything, you are giving the simple explanation of why the steps are like those in easy wordings. you are a really good teacher and you are now gaining a new subscriber!
You are a genius.
I tried the same with leather, it worked like a magic.
Thank you.
By faaaaar the best teacher of all times ! Your videos are so well explained and it works every time ! Never blocked in the middle of the video because you think about everything while explaining ! I owe you so much !
Seriously, this has been the best tutorial on this topic yet. I assume the same can and is used for smoothing out wrinkles on peoples faces.
I'm learning more with you than I'm doing in classes, thank you so much! ♥
Your tutorials are by far the best I have watched. I find your tutorials much easier to understand. Thank you so much for putting out clear and easy tutorials to follow.
Yeah he is good!!
The best and clearest tutorial I've ever watched... Congratulations!!!!
I've known of Frequency Separation for a few years now, but after watching this, I realise I didn't have a clue. Thank you for helping me fix an issue with deep creases in fabric that I wasn't able to fix previously!
Unmesh, you are a Superstar! Your tutorials are so super useful, this one just saved me hours of work and tons of frustration. Thank you very, very much!
Once again thank you for taken the time out to do these. Your explanation on how to is simple and easy to follow. I do not understand why people have not liked this it makes no sense why you would not like to know a new technique.
NotmyName It must be very difficult for them to watch 4seconds of there life go by right enough.
It is getting more n more comprehensive right to the bone of it, thanks Unmesh Mr Frequency separation n the beautiful family out there, Have a nice day everyday.
you are so thorough..thank you so much...you are clear in your explaining and understanding.
You're incredibly awesome and talented. Words are missing! God bless you man!
i know ive said it many many times but your videos are so easy to foĺlow
You are so awesome. I knew nothing about PS, and you have been my teacher from the start. I just completed a photo shoot and I edited all of the photos myself in PS and LR. Thank you!
Thank you very much, i love the fact that u also explain the meaning behind every action u do and not just the outcome
A BIG THANK YOU PIXIMPERFECT. It's working!!! and I have learned a lot from your vid. It feels like attending photoshop class for free. Thank you so much for sharing this knowledge with us. You're the best!!!!!
Once again, my clients will think I am a total wizard. You are an exceptional teacher!
I love Unmesh sm. You’re like the Bob Ross of photoshop ♥️
Amazing! You’re really good. Thanks for explaining it in detail and in a way we could easily understand. Keep growing!
I used this technique on wrinkled hands! It did miracles. Thank you so much!
Dude, you deserve a million subscribers.
Just wanted to let you know... that your tutorials are amazing. Your voice is calming, and your videos are so informative. Thank you; thank you; thank you!
Dude your channel is the main source of learning Photoshop for me
What a lovely family. PS: you are the best instructor in the photoshop world, the King, thanks for your videos, regards from the netherlands
Love the way you try to break down the process and make them understand and internalize rather than just copying and doing it.
Unmesh for President!! Thank you kindly for all your hard work🤗
Finally, a frequency separation explanation that's simple and easy to understand. Keep on doing the great job! Greetings from Poland :)
You have been a godsend to me. I have always struggles with photos of people. My area has been mostly houses and landscapes but I wanted and needed to learn to do portraits better. This has helped a lot. Now to learn my lighting better
You are my Photoshop teacher. Thank you on so many levels.
This is absolute magic. Wonderful explanation and this is seriously a life saver. This removes all the wrinkles without changing the texture of the clothing.
I love the use of math and science applied to photoshop. Thank you so so much.
thank a lot. you help me to raise my knowledge in photoshop and give me mor tools than my teacher in my Collage.
by the way
you have beautiful family. God Bless you and your family. thank again
g
Every time I have a photoshop conundrum at work your videos always have the answer. Great stuff man!
sir aap india k best photoshop teacher ho...the way u teach..simplify everything for us....big salute...
Thank You. I finally found the easiest and most effective way to reduce, or remove clothing wrinkles.Your tutorial is clear and easily understood.
Oh my God, you just saved me hours of work. I was planning on doing an all-nighter because I thought I will never finish ironing clothes in photoshop :D Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge so selflessly.
Nothing but pure respect to you sir!!!!!
Fantastic explanation. Excellent teacher!!
Very nice technique. Looks like this can be used on skin to take out subtle wrinkles as well.
The multiple examples was so effective - I'm a photoshop noob, and this was so helpful!
You saved me soooooo much time and frustration. I almost went on a clonestamp mission trying to remove big fabricwrinkles. BIG THANKS!!!!
Another excellent tutorial Unmesh! .😊😊
This is incredible, I had no idea this could be done. I took this method and turned the "WET" quality up to get faster results on VERY wrinkled clothing. Thank you so much.
Thank you for the awesome videos you create for us to learn Photshop easily!
Fantastic. Thank you! This video is SO sharp, it looks like you are actually here in front of me!
So Cool!!!! You saved my wrinkled shirt in my clients portrait!!!! Thanks Unmesh, you ROCK!!!!!
I've learned more from you than the years spent in photoshop classes
I keep coming back to this video, this is the video who introduced me to this photoshop genius :). Love from 🇵🇰
YO! i FOUND THIS IS PASSING and this is the best THE BEST tutorial I've seen yet. Period. I'm going to try out a few of your other ones and I just maybe become a member. Keep is simple....keep the explanation easy to follow. This is perfect!!
Underated content creator.
I very much enjoyed this video, it was explained so well and then you did the same thing over but faster each time! Love that because I feel like I'm able to do it with you easier! Thanks
Great video! And I've seen a lot on Frequency separation. Yours was the clearest! I just used it on a client who had a very bumpy bra on under her t-shirt. Managed to smooth all the bumps out while maintaining good texture on the fabric. Perfect!
Dude, you're such a good teacher. Thank you!
Great and clear tutorial; more power to you. You have a beautiful family, by the way!
Simply love your tutorials!
Indeed, beautiful family and another fantastic video tutorial. Thanks for sharing!
Thank you! You have saved me hours trying to digital iron wrinkles.
There's a nice way to prove there's no difference between the add and subtract way. In your last example of the photo with you and your parents, set the last created layer (Background copy) to the blending mode "difference". It's result is a complete black image, hence there's no difference between the two layers.
Excellent tutorial. Thank you 🙏
Ah, you saved an entire shoot with this technique! Thank you!
Wow, awesome technique, beautifully clear explanation. Thanks!
oh gosh, finally I found someone explaining so good! Thanks a lot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This was so helpful, you have the most useful videos. Thank you!!
Umesh u are the best teacher to learn from I love your teaching technique is just so perfect and understanding thanks for your impact I love you
you saved my job 😁 I appreciate your help
Man you are the hero we don't deserve, infinite thanks!
Hey there Unmesh! First of all: love your videos! Awesome job with them! I wanted to comment on how you were testing with the subtract vs. add in the Apply Image dialog. You were actually just one step away from completely proving that there is zero difference between the two methods. Recreate your 2 cases, like you did in the video. Then set the blend mode of the bottom version to "Normal", and the version above it to "Subtract". If there were any differences between the two, you would be able to see them as non-black values (lum. greater than 0)...but that doesn't appear to be the case, at least not to the naked eye.
I analyzed the exact output of the Subtract operation closer and discovered that there actually IS a very minute difference between the two methods. Here's how you can verify this: create a stamp of the subtracted difference of the two methods to a new layer. Drop the image to 8 bit and then change the image mode to indexed. Now you should have the ability to create an image map and see exactly what values show up in the difference between the two methods. If there was no difference between them, you should only see black...but that wasn't the case for me. Instead, I had 17 colors in my color table. Most were ALMOST black (#010000, #000100, etc), but nonetheless, not actual black.
Now that I knew there was a difference, I wanted to be able to visually see what the difference was, in case it was just irrelevant noise. So I backed up in the history so I had a 16 bit image again and applied a Levels adjustment to the stamped layer to see if I could bring out the hidden differences in it. In my case, all I had to do was change the Highlight Input Level from 255 to 3 and voila! It added the needed contrast to see the subtle variations in the stamped layer. A lot of it was noise (which might have just been calculation errors/variations somewhere in Photoshop), but I could definitely make out a distinct outline of my original image, which means there were at least SOME significant differences between the two methods.
Just to verify that the differences I was seeing aren't due to calculation differences in Photoshop while performing the Apply Image operation (regardless of which method we use) I did a second Subtract on a new layer and did the above steps to see if there were any pixels other than black (#000000)...and there weren't. So that means that Photoshop performs consistent calculations when applying images this way (which is good!)
Sooooo, it looks like there ARE some subtle differences between using Add and Subtract in the Apply Image dialog. But we're talking about differences that you can't even see with the naked eye. As far as I'm concerned, these two methods are pretty much interchangeable--unless someone can demonstrate why they believe differently.
Anyway, just thought I would share my test and its results with you in case you wanted to share with your viewers and maybe finally put some of this controversy surrounding this to rest. Cheers my friend! Keep up the great videos!
Didn't even know this was possible! WOW! Thank yoou
Thanks for sharing your gift of teaching. I've been using FS for years on skin but never fully understood how worked and had no idea what a powerful tool it can be for other applications. Thank you for your detailed explanation! Worked like a charm.
Just what I needed! Awesome!
I have to say , I geek out every time I'm following your instructions. I usually have my own photo up. I find it if I'm personally connected to the photo i'm editing, my mind becomes a sponge. Your technical terms transform into layman terms. I find myself giving outburst of excitement . My wife is not to happy about it, but hey go big or go home right lol. But that term doesn't make sense because I'm at home during the outbursts lmao. Thank you for helping me take my editing to the next level :-)
Once again, you have a solution to the problem I had. Awesome Channel Boss!
Amazing video! I learned frequency separation in class recently but wasn't sure what applications it had. Thank you for this video :)
You're really helping me to improve my photoshop technics. Thanks and keep up the awesome jobs you're doing!
i combined this with my technique and the result is perfect...Thanx a lot sir!
I don't think you realize how many careers you saved with your tutorials.
Oh my ! That's amazing ! I don't really understand what I do (but I sure will watch the other video about the concept behind it), but it works like a charm. THANK YOU !
So much learn from you.Best regards from Macedonia
superb video brother. nice presentation skills u got.
Thank you so much Unmesh. Awesome tutorial and what a beautiful family you have! Can this technique be done both on wrinkled shirts and skin blemishes in the same photo? Or do I have to create different frequency separation layers for each problem?
Thank you boss for this awesome tutorial..one of my client always gives instructions to remove wrinkles from clothes and really this is awesome helpful tutorial for me...
BEST PS VIDEO TUTORIAL, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!
this guy is a hero
lovely family 💖
very detailed, good for very beginners
Nice explanation. I already used an action to do this, but this visual explanation gives more founding to the concept. Thanks! Basically also like in sound design, an oscillator (sine/saw/square) and a LFO (*low frequency oscillator).
Thank you! This is magical !
another great vid. lovely family photo btw.
Nice video sir...... & .......thanks for sharing knowledge.
You are a great teacher dude. Thanks so much.