Thanks. I can count in Kerry having read the manual and making a thorough review. That cap measure was something else. Wonder why it was so bad? The UT61e+ does cap measures very quickly.
Interesting review, seems to be quite a capable meter apart from the capacitance update rate. Generally though these meters aren't brilliant for capacitance and induction and I find myself better off with an LCR meter that can be calibrated and measurement frequency / mode adjusted to suit the range.
This meter costs more than my Agilent 34401A and my Keithley 2015 combined with calibration for both and can't hold a candle to either wrt performance and doesn't have graphing ability like Rigol or Siglent. Plus the Keithley has THD and limited SMU functions! I'd even say my old HP 3478A is more stable at 5 1/2 digits! I'd put this in the same category as the East Tester ET3240 I bought as a beater for the garage/workshop bench but with 2 extra digits and 4 times the price;
I have two sets of probe masters probes and I love them (their tips are a bit too sharp IMO). For the reviews thought I typically stick with the supplied ones.
It will be interesting to see the inside. As mentioned above, I have a Keysight 34460A, from which the UT8806E obviously takes much inspiration. The Keysight meter is really a work of art for its interior layout, one of the cleanest instrument designs I have seen.
It's kinda funny ... all this new tech, fast (arm) CPUs and whatnot but autoranging features are kinda slow. Some of my old 6 1/2 and 7 1/2 HP bench multimeters are faster with the autoranging and accurate at the same time.
Thanks. I can count in Kerry having read the manual and making a thorough review.
That cap measure was something else. Wonder why it was so bad? The UT61e+ does cap measures very quickly.
Interesting review, seems to be quite a capable meter apart from the capacitance update rate. Generally though these meters aren't brilliant for capacitance and induction and I find myself better off with an LCR meter that can be calibrated and measurement frequency / mode adjusted to suit the range.
This meter costs more than my Agilent 34401A and my Keithley 2015 combined with calibration for both and can't hold a candle to either wrt performance and doesn't have graphing ability like Rigol or Siglent. Plus the Keithley has THD and limited SMU functions! I'd even say my old HP 3478A is more stable at 5 1/2 digits! I'd put this in the same category as the East Tester ET3240 I bought as a beater for the garage/workshop bench but with 2 extra digits and 4 times the price;
Kerry, please get yourself a set of probe master probes the gold plated standard. Thanks. Your measurements will change. Thanks
I have two sets of probe masters probes and I love them (their tips are a bit too sharp IMO). For the reviews thought I typically stick with the supplied ones.
Teardown it please
High qualify probes that aren’t gold plated? How so?
The quality of your probes ain't come down to just whether or not its tips are gold plated :)
Wow! Dave from eev blog would call this a "Bobby Dazzler"!
No teardown? would be nice to see inside.
That will be in the next video.
It will be interesting to see the inside. As mentioned above, I have a Keysight 34460A, from which the UT8806E obviously takes much inspiration. The Keysight meter is really a work of art for its interior layout, one of the cleanest instrument designs I have seen.
UNI-T always seem to set the fan to max with no temperature control.
It's kinda funny ... all this new tech, fast (arm) CPUs and whatnot but autoranging features are kinda slow. Some of my old 6 1/2 and 7 1/2 HP bench multimeters are faster with the autoranging and accurate at the same time.
there is obviously a hugh price difference
@@cong-organic ye, the old HP bench multimeters are cheaper from used marked and are no longer sold new
Haven't You earned your free trip to China for your last 100 reviews of Chinese Products?