Capitalism vs Socialism vs Communism - The Easiest Explanation

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.ค. 2022
  • Watch The Full Episode Here: • Cold War Conspiracy Th...
    Listen To The Full Episode On Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/0NXO...
    🎧 Listen To #TheRanveerShow On Spotify:
    open.spotify.com/show/6ZcvVBP...
    ✅ Subscribe To Our Other TH-cam Channels:-
    BeerBiceps (English Channel):
    / beerbicepsofficial
    Ranveer Allahbadia (Hindi Channel):
    / ranveerallahbadia
    TRS Clips हिंदी (Hindi Podcast Highlights):
    / @theranveershowhindi
    BeerBiceps Shorts (English Shorts):
    / @bestoftrs
    Ranveer Allahbadia Shorts (Hindi Shorts):
    / @bestoftrshindi
    BigBrainco. :
    / @raaazofficial
    BigBrainco. Shorts :
    / @raaazclips
    Once again on the show, we have with us an ‘Abhijit Chavda’ Special episode on TRS. This series of 3 geopolitics special episodes are primarily made for international audiences
    In part 1, we break down what happened before World War 2, and why it happened, from a global perspective. - • World War 2 - Abhijit ...
    Part 2, where we break down the cold war and what happened after WW2 (1990).
    Part 3, in which we discuss the global superpower - the USA. Part 3 of the series will be released on the 19th of July’22 on TH-cam. Stay tuned.
    Abhijit Chavda is an expert physicist, historian, and extremely learned and well-read man. One of the most knowledgeable humans I've had the pleasure to talk to. He is also a Public Speaker, a TH-camr, and a widely influential personality on Twitter.
    In this video, Abhijit simply explains the difference between capitalism, socialism, and communism. What makes these ideologies different? Watch the full clip to understand more.
    #capitalism #1427
    INSTAGRAM : @beerbiceps
    / beerbiceps
    FACEBOOK : @beerbiceps
    / beerbiceps
    TWITTER : @beerbicepsguy
    / beerbicepsguy
    LINKEDIN : @beerbiceps
    / beerbiceps
    TELEGRAM: @beerbicepsguy
    t.me/beerbicepsguy
    SNAPCHAT: @beerbicepsguy
    ----------------------------------------------
    About :
    TRS Clips is a collection of SHORT CLIPS from The Ranveer Show podcast. The Ranveer Show by Ranveer Allahbadia has grown to become India's biggest and smartest English Podcast on audio platforms. Hope you enjoy our latest knowledge-fueled videos from the BeerBiceps team.

ความคิดเห็น • 520

  • @deepak-dhankhar
    @deepak-dhankhar ปีที่แล้ว +334

    Yes, in India, socialism is there and govt can acquire one's property if needed, but in exchange govt will pay appropriate amount to the person, that is our constitutional right, not fundamental right.

    • @prashikshegaonkar5357
      @prashikshegaonkar5357 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Yes, but the issue is that the Government itself decides the ‘appropriate amount’, which in most cases is very less than the market value of the property.

    • @ulisirius9027
      @ulisirius9027 ปีที่แล้ว

      Globalism takes over the whole world without any exception all over for all eternity. All will be absorbed, no outside anymore.
      Teil 1 : Der subjektlose Prozess der Verwertung des Werts aus Wert mehr Wert zu generieren führt vermittelt durch den stummen Zwang der Konkurrenz zum Prozess des Kapitals zum Weltkapital. Dabei bleiben schwache Nationen auf der Strecke, mittlere werden unterhöhlt, starke bilden Tiefe Staaten aus. Bei diesem Prozess bildet sich eine transnationale Ebene , bestehend aus Multis, Multikultis, NGOs, EU usw.. ( Globalisierung). Globalismus befördert diesen Prozess, bewusst wie bewusstlos.
      Teil 2 Vermittelt durch den stummen Zwang der Konkurrenz, dem Neid, der Gier, ab er auch dem Wunsch nach Sorgfalt, der ökologischen Rückverfolgbarkeit, der Bekämpfung von Kriminalität, Steuerhinterziehung, dem Wunsch zu kennen was der Konsument wie konsumiert, dem Wunsch nach Kontrolle, der besseren Konsumierbarkeit, der immanenten technischen Entwicklung bedingt auch durch mögliche Kriege usw., wird die Technologie, Information, Konsumption, Produktion zusammengeschaltet gleichgeschaltet und immer mehr werden angeschlossen. Immer mehr wird vercodet und gechipt.Die industrielle Maschinerie verschmilzt mit dem Organischen und der nationalen Staatsmaschine. Alles was hergestellt wird kommt in die Maschine alles was benötigt wird aus der Maschine. Güter fliessen in der Maschine. Alle sind angeschlossen. Überall ist Zentrum.
      Teil 3 Rückkopplung des Konsums in die Produktion geschieht automatisch. Jeder Wunsch jede Ab- Stimmung wird erfasst und koppelt sich in die Maschine zurück Das Marketing möchte das wie, wann wo und warum kennen. Cookies werden losgeschickt und implementiert. Zentralisierung der Macht führt zum planetaren Kontrollstellen wie im Bankenwesen. Digitalisierung führt zur Abschaffung des Bar- Geldes.
      Teil 4 Das Warenuniversum des Kapitals und seine Logik ist imperial und total. Alles wird absorbiert, verschiedenes wird verglichen, bedingt durch das Geld, dem Gleichmacher, es ist Vergleichung. Die Egalité ist was sehr kapitalistisches. Das Kapital geht mit der Communis schwanger.
      Teil 5 Jede Abstimmung immerzu soll da in Perfektion erfasst sein und keine Ab- Stimmung soll verloren gehen. Die Geldmonaden, das formvollendete Individuum soll da schwirren in der Zirkulation, global total. Frei verfügbar soll die Arbeitskraft weltweit verwertet werden
      können. Nationalstaaten sind heute dafür nur noch hinderlich. Die reine Plutokratie ist durchgesetztes Weltkapital. Radikal imperial. Formvollendete Verhandelbarkeit von allem Abstimmbarkeit über jedes Vegleichbarkeit von allem. D.h. auch Austauschbarkeit. Voilà der Globalfaschismus als vollendete Plutokratie. Dieser kann mehr technokratische, mehr ökofaschistische Züge haben, er kann auch oszillieren. Hängt wohl von der Verlaufsform ab.
      Teil 6 Vergleichung ist dem Gelde immanent. Irgend ein Schnösel legt ein Sack davon auf den Tisch. Wer Gleichheit ablehnt muss das Geldsystem ablehnen. So liegt in der Unterhölung des Bargeldes immer auch die Kontrolle, der Kontrollwunsch. Die Krise kann zu Reformgeld aber auch zur Weltkastenherrschaft führen. Die Eliten können direkt durchregieren. Voilà, Globalfaschismus als Kastenherrschaft.
      Teil 7 Die Digitalisierung führt zur weiteren Machtkonzentration aber auch der Abschaffung des Bargeldes. Da alle an die Maschine angeschlossen sind kann theoretisch eben auch die Dazwischenkunft des Geldes ganz abgeschafft werden. Die Leute nehmen sich das was sie benötigen "aus" der Maschine. Was knapp ist wird via Zufallsgeneratoren zugewiesen.
      Jeder ist qua Geburt oder Zeugung darin. Alle sind schlussendlich eingebetet in die Maschine. Es gibt kein Aussen mehr. Alle Universa und Dimensionen sind all absorbiert für alle Zeit und Ewigkeit bis in alle Ewigkeit. Voilà Globalfaschismus als Communis. Lohnsystem ist auch beseitigt. Zumindest politökonomisch. (Bei-Sein-In).
      Teil 8 Durch Machtkämpfe können sich Eliten durchsetzen die die Technologien völlig nihilistisch befördern. Es entstehen dystopisch kollektivistische Szenarien. Giger Kunst, Borg, Matrix worin die Technik den Menschen verschlingt und vernutzt. ( In- Sein-Bei). Voilà Globalfaschismus als Dystopie.
      Teil 9 Und bedingt durch Ordo ab Chaos Strategien, aber auch apolaren Strategien, werden Nationalstaaten geschwächt. Umvolkung bzw. Migrationspakt laufen aus dem Ruder. Der faschistische Islam übernimmt das Szepter. Auch durch Dekadenz ist ein solches Szenario möglich. Voilà der Islamfaschismus. Umma als sklavistisch mafiotisches Dschihad Imperium.
      Teil 10 Wichtig ist noch folgendes. Die Communis basiert auf Transzendenz auf Entwicklungsfähigkeit. Dazu ist eine Art bewusste Religion/ Spiritualität vonnöten. Dies zur Abgrenzung der Dystopie. Wir wollen den neuen Menschen als Chiborg( Kiborg) nicht Borg.
      Teil 11 Dies und das. Vermehrung erfolgt kulturell wie von einer gewissen Stabilität aus betrachtet aber auch idealtypisch 1. Monogam, 2.polygam( mit Sexsklaverei und Cousinenehe), 3. Retortenzucht, Eugenik, Euthanasie oder Lebensschutz. 4. Promisk in Kombination mit öffentlichen Ritualen 5. Polyamorie kann durchaus überall auftreten. Ist aber keine feste Struktur. --- Ausserdem kämpft das Lebensschützerische gegen das Bevölkerungsreduktionistische. Das Sexualfeindliche gegen das Sexualfreundliche.
      Teil 12 Der universale Kampf. Seit es höhere Staatlichkeit oder militärische Kampfkraft gibt, gibt es die Auseinandersetzung ob die Ordnung lokal, gruppenspezifisch, regional zu verbleiben hat oder "überall" zu gelten hat. Dabei ist es einerlei ob etwas partikulares universal ausgebreitet wird oder eine universelle Idee. Da es nicht nur die Erde mit Leben gibt, sondern auch andere Planeten mit Leben und auch höherem Leben, ist davon auszugehen das dieser Grundkonflikt wirklich und wahrhaftig universal ist. Dieser Kampf ist derjenige zwischen Empire/ Global Gouvernance/Weltordnungsidee/ Reichsidee auf der einen Seite und der nationalen Souveränität(Nationalsouveränismus) auf der anderen Seite. Dabei gibt es viele Pläne auf allen Seiten, bewusstes wie unbewusstes agieren. Die Vertreter der Weltordnungsidee agieren dabei selbstverständlich mit allen Mitteln Mitteln, wie auch ihre Gegner. Heute zumeist unipolar oder apolar. Die souveränistischen Akteure zumeist von strikter Souveränität( mit Cheks and Balances und direkter Kommunikation) oder gehen von einem Konzept von Multipolarität aus. Nationale Souveränisten gehen davon aus das es Freihandel nur unter gleichstarken geben kann. Idealtypisch demokratisch, moderate Libertäre wie moderate Sozialisten. Starker Präsident oder Milizkollegium. Der Kapitalismus wird sozial gezähmt, allerdings nicht überwunden. Jede Nation soll ihre eigene Raumfahrt machen. --- Es ist noch hinzuzufügen das es wechselnde Allianzen und Querfronten geben kann. Und auch die Strömungen untereinander sich zum Teil heftig bekämpfen können.
      Teil 13. Attila Hildmann. Faktisch alles kann globalistisch transformiert werden. Selbst völkisches und partikulares kann umgedreht werden. Deshalb wäre bei Durchsetzung des deutschen Nationalsozialismus umgehend ein globalistischer Transnationalsozialismus geworden. Hildmann verkürzt vieles ist aber unterstützenswert da er das Overton Fenster verschiebt. Hildmann ist wie Kenfm Antizionist. Kenfm hat mehr Einfluss wie ein Hildmann. Zionismus. Ist die Bewegung für Volk und Heimat im Judentum und die Durchsetzung europäisch abendländischer Nationalstaatlichkeit innerhalb des Judentums. Bei allen Allianzen, mit Globalisten Selbsthassern, Islamisten usw., war der Zionismus bis jetzt sehr erfolgreich sich durchzusetzen. Antisemitismus kann man überwinden durch Affirmation der Zirkulation. Zum einen wie Trump durch nationalen Patriotismus und (säkularisierten) Calvinismus. Zum anderen wie es Finanzglobalisten tun, alles in die Zirkulation. Dahin gehört auch der Globalfaschismus der Israel zu Weltisrael (Postzionismus) aufbläst oder die Zirkulation durch die Maschine ersetzt oder diese deckungsgleich macht. (Postkapitalismus) Attila verbleibt auf der subjektiven Handlungsebene und verabsolutiert diese bzw. hängt sich bei Spezialplänen auf. Es ist zwar richtig das es Verantwortlichkeiten gibt, es den universalen Kampf aber eben nicht juckt ob mehr Soros, mehr, Transhumanismus mehr Gates oder Rockefeller dahintersteckt, die Engelwesen auf Sirius juckt das nicht... Es sind eben nicht nur Juden sondern auch Buddhisten, Christen, Synkretisten, Mohammedaner, Nihilisten,Atheisten usw unter den globalistischen Akteuren... Compact Magazin.
      Communis ist gemeinschaftlich durchgeführter Genuss. Dies gilt überhistorisch. Das marxsche präfaschistische Verständnis verbleibt in erster Linie bürgerlich immanent. Heute wissen wir: Emanzipation führt in den Transhumanismus, ist zwar auch globalfaschistisch, aber wohl dystopisch.
      Bin zwar kein Identitärer aber ohne Identitäres wird es nicht gehen. War früher eher wachstumskritisch, bzw. für einen Mix, heute neige ich immer mehr zur massiven Steigerung der Energieflussdichte, mindestens bis die Nationen eigene Weltraumsiedlungen haben.Siehe Positionen Dr Blex, Benedict Kaiser, Sieferle, Sellner, Curio, LaRouche.(Spannungsbogen).
      Quelle zum Globalfaschismus. Kommentarsektion von Kenfm. Dort treten Globalfaschisten hervor. Propagieren aggressiv Reichsidee. Bedrohen AfD, Identitäre, Kenfm und seine Querfronten, Patrioten usw..Sind für (!!!) SAntifa.

    • @cm17070
      @cm17070 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@prashikshegaonkar5357 market value is mostly decided by upper classes people, businessmen or corrupt people but that's not the actual value

    • @prashikshegaonkar5357
      @prashikshegaonkar5357 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@cm17070 Thats not the actual value? Then what is? The one which Government decides? Figured…😄

    • @sugargay7168
      @sugargay7168 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Theres the same here in the US. Its referred to as “imminent domain”

  • @Emoechaiti
    @Emoechaiti ปีที่แล้ว +234

    It's stupid for a country to hold onto one ideology. A country should focus on development and apply whatever ideology is suitable at that given time.

    • @exponentialcomplexity3051
      @exponentialcomplexity3051 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      No. Capitalism is the only ideology which can really ensure that everyone benefits by creating opportunities.

    • @MayankKumar-rc5hh
      @MayankKumar-rc5hh ปีที่แล้ว +37

      @@exponentialcomplexity3051 Even the person who popularised this concept had said that there need to be check

    • @exponentialcomplexity3051
      @exponentialcomplexity3051 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@MayankKumar-rc5hh Of course. No system without any checks and balances will work. But I was comparing capitalism against communism. Communism only gives an illusion of shared wealth. In reality it's always the rule of a few small minority.

    • @anthonyesposito7
      @anthonyesposito7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@exponentialcomplexity3051 So in other other word capitalism and communism are the same 🤔

    • @MayankKumar-rc5hh
      @MayankKumar-rc5hh ปีที่แล้ว

      @@exponentialcomplexity3051 Communism is a failed ideology.. it's not practical , socialism too.. Capitalism with welfareism is the only way

  • @harshgoyal4258
    @harshgoyal4258 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    Right to Property is actually a legal Right in constitution not a FR it was one of the biggest controversies in Indian Polity.

    • @vihaan1311
      @vihaan1311 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      wasn't it removed from the constitution ?

    • @romilmahant2971
      @romilmahant2971 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Do you knew what was the situation of the country that time and who was owning majority of property with free bonded labours?

    • @BackslashUnderscoreFullstop
      @BackslashUnderscoreFullstop 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@romilmahant2971 nope .. tell me

    • @anshikashukla5518
      @anshikashukla5518 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Earlier right to property was a fundamental right u/Article 31 ,but later on by 44th constitunal amendment it removed and replaced as a Legal right u/Article 300(a).
      Through this amendment Article 19(1)(g) &Article 31 removed from fundamental rights and become constitunal or legal right.

  • @Moonuuu
    @Moonuuu ปีที่แล้ว +74

    Capitalism: Jio & Airtel
    Socialism: BSNL

    • @anuragsarkar7671
      @anuragsarkar7671 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Bsnl needs to be revitalized.

    • @ankit4323
      @ankit4323 ปีที่แล้ว

      😅😅😅😅😅

    • @nirbhaysharma9872
      @nirbhaysharma9872 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Well that explains 2g scam

    • @anuragsarkar7671
      @anuragsarkar7671 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @lakshya varshney It's called a government business. And government state controlled economy is the reason why former Soviet Union and present China made so economic progress. It's estimated that the Soviet gdp would be 30 trillion dollars ahead of China and USA if it would exist today. That's the power of economic socialism.

    • @SanctuM8117
      @SanctuM8117 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@anuragsarkar7671 yes but all that money isnt of any use to the common man because the common man doesnt have freedom. also, even if the government is good for now, there is no guarantee that the next generation of leaders would be kind. if you give too much power to one entity (govt in case of socialism and communism) the possibility of corruption increases. there is no way socialism or communism will ever work without a dictatorship ruining it for everyone

  • @harshdubey4037
    @harshdubey4037 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Short term explanation wrt to political parties and their ideology.
    BJP:-Capitalism
    Congress before 1992:-Socialism
    After 1992:-A mix chunk of all communism,capitalism and socialism
    Left parties:-Communism.

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      That was the most lamest and stupidly simplified definition of India's history.
      India was never a Socialist country.
      1) Did India nationalize all the lands before 1990? No.
      2) Did India get rid of the landlord class before 1990? No.
      3) Were there private property in India before 1990? Yes, Ambani, Tata and Birla are who? Communists?
      4) Was Nehru a Socialist? No. Watch his interviews where he bashed Socialism.

    • @maitreyeemishra2498
      @maitreyeemishra2498 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@morningstararun6278indeed bjp isn't capitalist purely too

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@maitreyeemishra2498 BJP isn't purely capitalist? How? Explain this to me. They are the most capitalist and ultra right wing party in India today.

    • @maitreyeemishra2498
      @maitreyeemishra2498 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      @@morningstararun6278 their vote Bank makes them adopt pragmatic politics like the gareeb Kalyan yojana moreover india isn't a compettition driven society, bjp solidified reservations for ews people
      Indeed, they are ultra right, but economics us adjustable

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@maitreyeemishra2498 They have a really few policies that sound Socialist, because they too have the pressure of electoral politics. But they screw the working class and poor people completely by writing off the debts of companies that go bankrupt.

  • @ankit4323
    @ankit4323 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    Capitalism: Our evil
    Communism: Your evil
    Socialism: Still Confused 🤔🤔

    • @SonLe-gh3dz
      @SonLe-gh3dz ปีที่แล้ว +6

      We evil

    • @Commielover69
      @Commielover69 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      No you're still confused what socialism is
      Socialism is a path or step to communism

    • @skrtfghs
      @skrtfghs 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In communism there is single party system, no ownership of properties means govt will run all business. Socialism can be applied in any form of govt like democracy, single party, monarchy etc. Socialism means taking excessive wealth from rich and distributing. It is done by charging different taxes on the basis of income.

    • @FineWine-v4.0
      @FineWine-v4.0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@skrtfghsI feel pity for you

    • @skrtfghs
      @skrtfghs 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      why?@@FineWine-v4.0

  • @Suryanshsharma03
    @Suryanshsharma03 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Right to property is not a fundamental right but it is a LEGAL RIGHT !!

  • @alokshrivastav234
    @alokshrivastav234 ปีที่แล้ว +344

    Love from Nepal love to all the right wing community 🇳🇵🇳🇵

    • @allahlesboslu2_9
      @allahlesboslu2_9 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Hopefully Nepal and India become Hindu nations constitutionally 🤝 coz lot of South Asian nations like p u stoon kangludesh are already constitutionally b u &!@ m ! Why should only Hindus s u ccumb to s I c u larizm

    • @googleuser6894
      @googleuser6894 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also Nepalese shud fight to destroy the evil Nepalese Communist party which is becoming slave of China. Hope Nepal does not become like Pakistan.

    • @123austinpowers
      @123austinpowers ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@allahlesboslu2_9 nope. Let them live their own way. Why do u want to involve them if they dont want to. Hostile takeover is never the answer

    • @dwight2762
      @dwight2762 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@123austinpowers go check how this commie regime was instituted in Nepal . There was a coup ( helped by congress ofc ) all the heirs of the Royal Family were killed and the Hindu Rashtra was destroyed.

    • @_v3nom_737
      @_v3nom_737 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@allahlesboslu2_9 We don't want our society and political structure to be dominated by religion.

  • @HarshSharma-jk5hv
    @HarshSharma-jk5hv ปีที่แล้ว +45

    According to me, socialism,communism and capitalism are nothing but just the political promises and manifestos put forward by politicians to woo people. And at the end it's always few people who will come on top and will rule and use power for their own use. Rajneeti h sab

    • @pduttagupta
      @pduttagupta 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Agreed there is no utopian society country should belive at any ideology they like at a given point of time

    • @bzzz5276
      @bzzz5276 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      💯

    • @maitreyeemishra2498
      @maitreyeemishra2498 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Very biased right. People literally gave up their lives for communism in countries like republican China, Iran and tsarist Russia
      Capitalism I'd a tool of rich for the rich by the rich just asbout wealth accumulating and that hoax of consumer sovereignty Is hilarious

  • @RaviPrakash-dm2jb
    @RaviPrakash-dm2jb ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Ranveer I am really enjoying your each and every content that you are providing us Your thought process is absolutely tremendous

  • @nutanmallick738
    @nutanmallick738 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Please have a brief podcast about communism

  • @Cidagent999
    @Cidagent999 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I've watched several videos and this one has given me the most clarity

    • @itisharaghu9857
      @itisharaghu9857 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      if youre actually looking for information this video isn't the best source

    • @zauva4617
      @zauva4617 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@itisharaghu9857 exactly🤣🤣

    • @kunalfadtare2056
      @kunalfadtare2056 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The information in this video is wrong

  • @rajmita2057
    @rajmita2057 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Initially right to property was a fundamental right maybe because at the time of separation many people came from the other side of the borders for few decades. But later when everyone was more or less settled in India the right was amended as a legal right through 44th constitutional amendment,1978

  • @aayushdoshi3833
    @aayushdoshi3833 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This guy is just too good

  • @anirudhchakra3975
    @anirudhchakra3975 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    Actually old india before invasions ( before 1200 AD) india followed none of this ...bharat followed it's old dharmic distribution of wealth..the divide between rich and poor is extremely less ..everyone except king and his family lived equally with right distribution of rights and money

    • @tivky
      @tivky ปีที่แล้ว +32

      the king and his family too lived equally with the common people. that's why in south you will see all the big temples but not palaces and all

    • @Ashish-ss5nt
      @Ashish-ss5nt ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But how to implement it today that's the question

    • @chan_for
      @chan_for ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@tivky ​ It's not only south but in north too, the difference is that peacefuls stayed more in north

    • @spilltea4241
      @spilltea4241 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Lmao no

    • @nischaymiglani2617
      @nischaymiglani2617 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@tivky palaces in north have been made in recent centuries.
      In ancient times it wasn't like that.
      Majority of palaces were built during British era of British style.

  • @kumarraj9035
    @kumarraj9035 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    (05:11) "sovereign, socialist, secular ,democratic & republic" that's all... why Ranveer & co. don't know it despite having so much Knowledge. I think every one should know it...

    • @_v3nom_737
      @_v3nom_737 ปีที่แล้ว

      India is not at all Socialist.

    • @vihaan1311
      @vihaan1311 ปีที่แล้ว

      that is the first thing we are taught in our chapter 1 in Civics 'Our Constitution'

    • @mylord8105
      @mylord8105 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah lol

    • @aimexcellence1315
      @aimexcellence1315 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      his guests an his many topics are from WhatsApp university bro, dont expect him to be erudite

    • @SaiAbitathaDUCIC
      @SaiAbitathaDUCIC ปีที่แล้ว

      First of all, mentioning 'socialist' in the preamble is the biggest crime ever. Socialism can be the ideology of a political party, not of a country.

  • @anmolpandey9670
    @anmolpandey9670 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Capitalism....Work hard and be the Boss💖

    • @DonEduardo69
      @DonEduardo69 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🗿🙏🏻💯

  • @maari7132
    @maari7132 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I simple words if u refer communism and socialism then it would be nothing but disadvantages of capitalist ×1000 times

    • @loggygaming2112
      @loggygaming2112 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And I think you only hear some things and make a book from them without reading carefully

    • @wolfheart5408
      @wolfheart5408 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its not that simple. Communism is obviously ass, as seem from the evident examples, but capitalism is the hidden evil too. Take America for example, the greed of American capitalists made Mexico poor, and so many Mexicans and other people had to fall to poverty and drugs. It's just math, you can't create wealth from thin air. If you're bringing gold to your country, then you are most likely taking it from some other country.
      You know, listen to Philosophy of poverty by immortal technique

  • @vitalstats4122
    @vitalstats4122 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Everyone wants to earn money and make themselves rich. When we shall think rationally then we will realise capitalism is way more better than communism. On paper communism seems Utopian but the people who expirence they find it a dystopian. Socialism involves some of elements Marxist and ideology. Hence, Socialism is all about society and the state.

    • @yogeshdangi3253
      @yogeshdangi3253 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True. Communism failed everytime, everywhere

    • @user-xb5eo2bm1n
      @user-xb5eo2bm1n 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'd agree that capitalism is better than communism but it is by no means ideal. Capitalism is based on liberalism and individualism. These ideas are deeply engrained into Western society but not into India and most other non-Western countries. We have always traditionally been collectivist societies and that factor must be taken into account when governing a country like India. What we need is an indigenous system that is based on our own values while adopting elements of foreign ideologies selectively if they are in our best interest.

    • @kamilocaqverdiyev
      @kamilocaqverdiyev 9 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Don't lie. You see all the people dying from hunger under capitalism. Communism is better than capitalism. You just didn't experience real poverty under capitalism. Go ask people who are 60 + years old from Post-USSR countries like Russia, Poland etc, they all want communism back.

  • @nicolasbrown8541
    @nicolasbrown8541 ปีที่แล้ว

    Agreed To All Points

  • @KhitishKalindi
    @KhitishKalindi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Quite relevant 🙌

  • @themotarcyclediaries
    @themotarcyclediaries ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Socialism and communism is a nice to have concept and an ideal one which can be implemented to animals but not to humans who entice personal desires, that’s why capitalism is practical and communism is theoretical.
    Hybrid model like in Germany should be an ideal one for humans.

    • @holod3380
      @holod3380 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      for the same reason that a world without war is theory, and a world with war is practice. But does that make a world with wars or a few wars better?

    • @themotarcyclediaries
      @themotarcyclediaries ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@holod3380 have you ever seen/read in any stages of human history where there was no wars? Absolute peace?, because wars always exists, only the reasons for the war change, why ? Again it’s because of human desire and ambitions. If desires are true then pursue economic model which is true and not an unreal one like communism

    • @holod3380
      @holod3380 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@themotarcyclediaries If there has never been a world without war, there is nothing to start. Correctly?

    • @themotarcyclediaries
      @themotarcyclediaries ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@holod3380 yes, the best is to be prepared for it

    • @harshrai8267
      @harshrai8267 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@holod3380 war is a natural characteristic of any state. Talking for peace could be a necessity for short termed economical development but various mode of warfare could be executed for political aspirations in other way. So peace was never an option because we know other side won't miss any chance

  • @anindyasantra9397
    @anindyasantra9397 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Capitalism also same it's a clever way to rule by a very few of people...clever way to promote feudalism and slaverism

    • @gauraveshwar
      @gauraveshwar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Communism promote slavery see in china, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@gauraveshwar See in China, Vietnam, Cuba and North Korea? Where? There is no slavery in all of the countries you said. But US has a history of slavery, So how about not being a different©ahead from now on?

  • @Moonuuu
    @Moonuuu ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Socialism is like bsnl and Capitalism like Jio Airtel.

    • @Rayan42069
      @Rayan42069 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Bsnl is like communalism or even SBI bank. Where benefit goes to employees rather than customers

    • @AshwaniKumar-bq8bo
      @AshwaniKumar-bq8bo ปีที่แล้ว

      BSNL is not profitable for consumers

    • @temjenimchen7925
      @temjenimchen7925 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      BSNL branded as Socialism by name but it worked like a capitalism.

  • @enoshsubba5875
    @enoshsubba5875 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Root of all conflict

  • @robindungdung2772
    @robindungdung2772 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please make a video on privatization of PSU

  • @SATYA-31
    @SATYA-31 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Simple example of its
    - we get independence in 1947 🇮🇳
    - China get independence 1949 🇨🇳
    … compare us with them and u get answer

    • @davidbilla8063
      @davidbilla8063 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol china opened their market to capitalist America in 1970 tell that too. Today they rise to this level is thanks to capitalist companies who opened manufacturing and assembly companies in china

    • @Aegon_Targaryen
      @Aegon_Targaryen ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Only government of China is Communist but they are hard-core Capitalist
      They support apple company more then there workers

    • @rahilvig8185
      @rahilvig8185 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      India was socialist and still is socialist. China became very capitalist after 1978 so they became rich.

    • @thorasgardian616
      @thorasgardian616 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@rahilvig8185lol during the rule of Deng Xiaping's ideologies China grew a lot. It wasn't based on captilasim, rather a modified communism .

    • @whitehavencpu6813
      @whitehavencpu6813 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@thorasgardian616 They adopted capitalist ideas into the economy, namely free markets and free enterprise.

  • @tanmoynath2688
    @tanmoynath2688 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very very useful 😊😊😊😊😊

  • @__.shivam.singh._
    @__.shivam.singh._ ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome 🔥🔥!

  • @NuclearFusion200
    @NuclearFusion200 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Chinese and Soviet communist can call themselves communist all they want but they all fail to understand communist leading to a authorian governments. But authorism is not inherent to communist or socialism. It's just a result of historical context and internal circumstances

  • @biswaranjanmishra9689
    @biswaranjanmishra9689 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much

  • @thomasolson7447
    @thomasolson7447 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Who gave the soviets the bomb? I'll also note that Communism has a *capital* 'c' in it.

    • @awesomeguy6171
      @awesomeguy6171 ปีที่แล้ว

      Soviets 'Stole' the secrets. Thanks to KGB.

    • @thomasolson7447
      @thomasolson7447 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@awesomeguy6171 those were American's converted to KGB after the fact. Easy to do if they were brainwashed in University. You think the government would let KGB have those plans?

    • @srishreyas2170
      @srishreyas2170 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Doesn't make any sense 🤣

  • @FineWine-v4.0
    @FineWine-v4.0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Everyone loves capitalism until they get a taste of what it means to lose in a system like that & then watch them whine & cry😂😂😂

  • @krishnakantgupta6651
    @krishnakantgupta6651 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Listening abhijit chavda is like a soothing exercise

  • @andyhandy9977
    @andyhandy9977 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Actually..Socialism isn't that bad..it's just Nehru and Congress implemented it the bad way..nehru followed " Fabian Socialism " which is worst than communism

    • @TrophyGuide101
      @TrophyGuide101 ปีที่แล้ว

      Socialism doesn't work because it requires the state asserting control over an individual's labor, people will never accept that.

    • @allahlesboslu2_9
      @allahlesboslu2_9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nehru was busy l I cking b u &!@ m a $$ 🤣😂😂🤣😂

    • @staymotivated5743
      @staymotivated5743 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      every socialist and communist said that

    • @socialistsolidarity
      @socialistsolidarity ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@staymotivated5743 Maybe because they read and learn what socialism actually is. Whereas you probably blindly follow capitalism.

    • @theardentreader1984
      @theardentreader1984 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Typical socialist argument 😅.

  • @user-xb5eo2bm1n
    @user-xb5eo2bm1n 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So basically both capitalism and communism/socialism are flawed. What is the solution then?

  • @satyadeepak5
    @satyadeepak5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Please try to get Barack Obama.. His view will be really interesting

  • @_Shubham_9802
    @_Shubham_9802 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ek baat sabko bhulna nahi chahiye - Hitler ka "Nazism" ke German name - Nationalsozialismus and iske English name - National Socialism

  • @akshatverma2981
    @akshatverma2981 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Venezuela was one of the richest countries in 2010, an oil rich nation had a gdp per capita of 14,000 USD in 2014, today it's about 3000 USD, every single developed country in the west is a Capitalist country but still some idiots would endorse socialism and that's the reason for India still being a 3rd world country

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      USSR from a poor illiterate country to a superpower in 30 years.
      China from the sickman of Asia to a superpower in 74 years.
      And still some idiots would endorse Capitalism. And btw, India was never a Socialist country ever.If you think Nehru was a Socialist, then just watch his interviews

    • @maitreyeemishra2498
      @maitreyeemishra2498 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you even know what's a third world country, it's just the non aligned block not some economic basis

    • @iampiyushsingh7544
      @iampiyushsingh7544 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@morningstararun6278 Yeah if they are your reference, then we are doommed. The entire freedom to comment here will be gone.

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@iampiyushsingh7544 Be more clear. No one understands the focking point you are trying to make here. what is my reference that you are referring to?

    • @CrashCrash-em5rw
      @CrashCrash-em5rw 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Venezuela is a country with socialist party not socialist economy. Norway is a lot more socialist country than Venezuela with 66% of nationalised economy. Probably you won't provide example of Norway and Nordics which ranting about Socialism

  • @SurroachAbhinav1110
    @SurroachAbhinav1110 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ranveer Sir love your content the most. YOUR CONTENT IS VERY MUCH KNOWLEDGE. PLEASE GIVE ME HEART. LOVE YOUR CONTENT THE MOST
    .
    .
    .
    .
    PLEASE GIVE A HEART

  • @namangarg5284
    @namangarg5284 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    क्या है दक्षिण, क्या है वाम
    भूखे को रोटी से काम।

  • @DelvingDeeper
    @DelvingDeeper ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You clearly don’t understand socialism and communism enough to be speaking about the two and it’s rather apparent in the way you stumble over towards the end. There are clear definitions… For capitalism too which you somehow managed to not represent fully as well. One would have to however actually read up on the subject which you clearly didn’t.

  • @Truthseeking-oo7jv
    @Truthseeking-oo7jv 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    America: capitalist
    Russia: communist
    India : indentity crisis

  • @psikeyhackr6914
    @psikeyhackr6914 ปีที่แล้ว

    What did Karl Marx say about vanadium steel?
    The Laws of Physics do not care about economics. Machines wear out and therefore depreciate. The Laws of Physics cannot tell the difference between capital machines and consumer machines.
    We are listening to economists who can't do algebra.
    NDP = GDP - Dcap [Western economic calculation]
    NDP = GDP - (Dcap + Dcon) [reality]
    Dcap: Depreciation of Capital Goods
    Dcon: Depreciation of Durable Consumer Goods
    GDP: Grossly Distorted Propaganda
    Manufacturing trash designed to become obsolete is not creating wealth.

  • @yashlodh3677
    @yashlodh3677 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love socialism.....love to COMMUNISM ❤

    • @sharathgovindappa1783
      @sharathgovindappa1783 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Go to school kid

    • @ninjasword629
      @ninjasword629 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sharathgovindappa1783 bro you go

    • @gauraveshwar
      @gauraveshwar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it means u are lazy and want other's money for free by doing nothing😂😂..

    • @yashlodh3677
      @yashlodh3677 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gauraveshwar bro read the concept of socialism in taxation u will able to understand the building blocks of development

  • @anindyasarkar5208
    @anindyasarkar5208 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can you suggest communism in civil a society where you don't have anything to own.

  • @akashmaurya7676
    @akashmaurya7676 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yo man that's my wife
    No mate it's ours .

  • @rhuthwiksuresh6900
    @rhuthwiksuresh6900 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    The guy said there are no clear cut definitions.
    Here we go.
    Marxism: Criticism of feudal and capitalist societies laid out by Karl Marx within Das Kapital.
    Socialism: Seizure of the materials required for production from the hands of the bourgeoisie, who are business owners.
    Socialist state: A state, which is a representative of the working class, which is set up for the gradual seizure of the means of production from the bourgeoisie class.
    Communism: A stateless, classless, moneyless society where the workers control the production and the business owner class does not exist..
    Saying that these things do not have real definitions highlight the ignorance of the expert in the video.

    • @HarshSharma-jk5hv
      @HarshSharma-jk5hv ปีที่แล้ว +5

      He also said the same things basically and I don't see any ignorance

    • @roushansingh7884
      @roushansingh7884 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      He said the very same thing.. but yeah in real society, things overlap.. nothing is in its pure form! India is not purely socialist nor purely capitalist.. it is in the between! Well, situation also matters to form a kind of state the country needs to.. right now India should tend towards capitalism..

    • @prakhargoyal_6483
      @prakhargoyal_6483 ปีที่แล้ว

      finally someone said it

    • @percybeck923
      @percybeck923 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HarshSharma-jk5hv He didn't say the same thing, he was so wrong about socialism that he ended up in calling India a socialist country, India is a capitalist welfare state, china is the socialist state, socialism is basically the transition state from Capitalism to communism, presently Socialist states are China, Cuba, Vietnam and laos.

    • @percybeck923
      @percybeck923 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@roushansingh7884 india isn't a Socialist states by any means, india is a welfare state, china is the socialist state

  • @nicolasbrown8541
    @nicolasbrown8541 ปีที่แล้ว

    SOCIALISM MEANS THOSE WHO SURVIVE SOCIALLY _COMMUNISM MEANS WITHIN COMMUNITY N MARXISM MEANS WITHIN CERTAIN RACE

  • @hharish2134
    @hharish2134 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Socialism / Communism - Can only be implemented by coercion , ie. an Authority (Government)
    Capitalism - It was not "formed" or forced , but merely observed how free human beings will naturally will function. i.e. exchange value/service each other for a profit.
    Socialism Logical Fault - Is based on DISTRIBUTION , not mention of any CREATION. When no CREATION how can you DISTRIBUTE? Wealth is not created by DISTRIBUTION.

    • @FineWine-v4.0
      @FineWine-v4.0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Of course there is coercion in capitalism
      The state does it on the behalf of capitalists
      Internet was created via public funding

    • @hharish2134
      @hharish2134 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FineWine-v4.0 When STATE is on bed with CORPORATIONS that is called "Corporate Fascism" aka "Chronic Capitalism" aka "Monopoly". In the real capitalism its all about Free Market.

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@hharish2134 Whatever the sh!t that you refer to as real capitalism or "free" market have never existed in reality, because they either fail at the inception or after a few miles down the road.

  • @turjobennington1677
    @turjobennington1677 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    did he mispresent the communism theory?

  • @rohitphogat1112
    @rohitphogat1112 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanku bhai

  • @astronics
    @astronics ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is so wrong, he speaks bs with such confidence and people believe him

    • @pduttagupta
      @pduttagupta 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What is wrong care to explain,?

    • @Mr.Robot-_-
      @Mr.Robot-_- 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Chaddest_Maximus For one, he rarely mentioned the means of production and how whomever owns it, gets to dictate how to spend the profit. In socialism, it's the workers who own it, and they get to democratically decide how to spend it. (Hiring more staff, to decrease working ours) or (Increasing the salary, or investing in better working conditions, etc...) Under capitalism, the means of production, and the profit generated by the workers is privately owned by a small few. And as a result, they choose to spend the profit for their own self interests, completely disregarding the workers who made those profits possible.

    • @gauraveshwar
      @gauraveshwar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Mr.Robot-_-Workers are should get salary of CEO?😂 why dont these workers start their own companies? I believe everyone should be an entreprenuer, ser ur rate as per ur u.. if u are software developer or lawyer anythung.. promote freelancing cultute No free money to beggers

    • @Mr.Robot-_-
      @Mr.Robot-_- 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gauraveshwar you are deeply brainwashed. Society needs workers buddy, and they should be fairly compensated for their work. And who is going to work if everyone becomes entrepreneurs😭? One of the biggest roles of the CEO is to create profits for shareholders, especially at the expense of the workers. The CEO needs the workers, not the other way around.
      I agree with you, "no free money for beggars", but you seem to be confused who that is. The shareholders and the CEOs are the ones collecting the profit generated BY THE WORKERS. So fairly compensate the workers, for their work, and give the CEOs and shareholders a smaller piece of the pie. since all they do is steal profits that come from the worker. Can't wait for the working class to realize how exploited they are, maybe we should replace all CEO's with Artificial Intelligence😂. That will save so much money that the workers can use.

  • @shaam3214
    @shaam3214 ปีที่แล้ว

    FYI..
    Ranveer Brar or something......!
    It's not socialist or something...
    It's our preamble and constitution and it's our fundamental duty to respect and honour it.
    It's actually "Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic"
    Every word in the preamble is intended and deliberately put in such a way that even the commas and periods are thought more than over a 100 times before being used.
    The constitutional framers have intentionally used the words and where to put them and in what sequence should they be.
    The Constitutional framing process took 2 years 11 months and 18 days and everything we do now is a gift from the constitution, even the TH-cam videos we make, and the Freedom of speech we have and Healthy Food, environment, freedom etc we enjoy is the gift of constitution.
    So, my request is please atleast get to know about it atleast the basics and respect it.
    We spend a lot of time in unnessary activity but getting to know the constitution will improve us intellectually and individually too..
    Like for an Human being the name is his/her Identity and for the Country the constitution is.

  • @gaurangkulkarni4357
    @gaurangkulkarni4357 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So basically communism is full anarchy

    • @gauraveshwar
      @gauraveshwar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      rule of cunning thugs

    • @maitreyeemishra2498
      @maitreyeemishra2498 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Capitalism minus wealth motive

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@maitreyeemishra2498 Communism is wealth for all motive. The definition of Communism written by a toiletless Uttar Pradesh guy is not the right meaning of Communism.

  • @angurdas8110
    @angurdas8110 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is Liberalism

  • @niteshmurti
    @niteshmurti ปีที่แล้ว +23

    respect abhijit a lot, but if i'm not mistaken even in united states,australia government can take your property for public benefit, not 100% sure about this.
    EDIT: It's called Eminent Domain. In America, it's in the fifth amendment of their constitution (last sentence of 5th Amendment). cannot seize private property without giving just compensation. Even in India, a just and fair amount needs to be given to the citizen who's property is being seized, amount shall not be less than the market value of the property (Article 31A)

    • @pallavsharma5445
      @pallavsharma5445 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      art. 31 is deleted from fundamental rights and added as 300A as legal right in India.

    • @manumudgal4988
      @manumudgal4988 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pallavsharma5445 He is talking about Foreign

  • @siddharthsoni6734
    @siddharthsoni6734 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Socialism and communism just doesn't work in economic sense.
    Ultra capitalism is bad too.

  • @pratinavp
    @pratinavp ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I think it's high time we break the shackles of socialism and actually focus on creating some wealth in a nation with so much potential. The fact is, in the name of distribution of wealth, we are effectively distributing poverty across the nation since the fact is that there is simply not enough wealth to even support the basic material needs of our indian society. We must realise this and become more enterprising and goal oriented while being productive and proactive in contributing to national wealth for larger good of the country. Otherwise we can never become a vishwaguru or establish our own sphere of influence. Wealth and economic power is the single most important thing which helped the US establish a huge sphere of influence. Much larger than Russia. Now, china is on the same path. It's high time India rises to the occasion. Disinvestment, free markets with necessary regulations, an economy which fosters competition and the functioning of price mechanism is of utmost importance to achieve the objective. Just an opinion 😀

    • @askmeanything2119
      @askmeanything2119 ปีที่แล้ว

      here indians are thinking about bringing in abrupt capitalism at times when the western world has tried , tested and failed . The only true utopian society will be a Neo marxist communist democracy , like Sweden and Finland .

    • @aimexcellence1315
      @aimexcellence1315 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      what is your nation? only 7 or 8 bussinesmans and their close tied families?? we have grown economic valley, on side indian companies earning 300 crore per day other side farmers die for 5k / 10k ka karja, aren't these farmers/small people not coming under your definition of "nation"

    • @akhileshpatro8707
      @akhileshpatro8707 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @aimexcellence1315 we need make such laws that big people do not exploit small people but that doesnt mean we should not support capitalism. It is only way to become superpower.

    • @damn7637
      @damn7637 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      How adani earning money increases nations wealth??

    • @tusharsharma8952
      @tusharsharma8952 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@aimexcellence1315 toh bhai kisne mana kiya hai farmers ko kamane ke liye. kamane ke liye bhi mehnat lagti hai. Har koi zero se start karta hai. businessmen ko crores bhagwan ji nahi deke jaate

  • @faaeizkhan6134
    @faaeizkhan6134 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:00 capitalism
    2:02 communism
    5:02 socialism

  • @angurdas8110
    @angurdas8110 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is Liberalism society

  • @spndp7
    @spndp7 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    5:11 These highly educated people don't even know the 1st line of Preamble of the Indian Constitution 😂 Man

  • @mr.harry06
    @mr.harry06 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bakwaas, kuch nhi pta isko.... 'communist society'? There's never been a communist society...nd socialism is a way, a transitional stage to move to a communist one.

    • @disprofundis3477
      @disprofundis3477 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      fir se wahi chudaap. There has never been a communist society because it really can't exist without bringing some sort of authoritarianism in the mix.

    • @thorasgardian616
      @thorasgardian616 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@disprofundis3477yeah these people shows communism as a mere tool of dictatorship but it's not. A true communism can be only attained if the people firstly get the basic amenities and proper education like in Kerala for example.

    • @whitehavencpu6813
      @whitehavencpu6813 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lmao so "Its not real communism" lol?

  • @jayanchada859
    @jayanchada859 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Best best is mixed economy like Singapore

    • @rahilvig8185
      @rahilvig8185 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂😂 Singapore is NOT a mixed economy. It is one of the MOST capitalist societies on the planet!

    • @blackracer688
      @blackracer688 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@rahilvig8185" mixed economy " is the answer given by Failed Socialist/communist. 😂

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@rahilvig8185 😂😂😂😂 Here is an interesting fact for you Mr. Capitalist deepthr0ater. More than 80 percent of the Singaporeans live in government housing. More than 40 percent of Singapore's income come from state owned enterprises. Singapore is much more Socialist than India

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@blackracer688 "mixed economy" is an answer given by failed capitalist countries like Pakistan, India and all the third world capitalist countries.

  • @Saswata_97
    @Saswata_97 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    He just totally messed up the basic concept of socialism and communism. 🤦‍♂️
    He knows very least about these.

    • @thorasgardian616
      @thorasgardian616 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yeah these people shows communism as a mere tool of dictatorship but it's not. A true communism can be only attained if the people firstly get the basic amenities and proper education like in Kerala for example.

    • @sattwikmohanty3272
      @sattwikmohanty3272 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@thorasgardian616yes nice education there , engineers applying for peon jobs

  • @Facts_bookss
    @Facts_bookss ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Capitalism 💖

  • @joegoldberg1543
    @joegoldberg1543 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Problem with communism unfortunately is that we are humans !!!

    • @tsMuthuraman-hm6wg
      @tsMuthuraman-hm6wg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But the present hindiism is most dangerous !

  • @user-mm8ru1iy2k
    @user-mm8ru1iy2k ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Every ism of this world is bad.....
    World doesnt work like this

    • @holod3380
      @holod3380 ปีที่แล้ว

      Choice only from this. Is there an option without ism?

    • @wolfheart5408
      @wolfheart5408 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@holod3380 Yes, the Arthashastra

    • @moonaka2
      @moonaka2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What about Humanitarianism. Check mate.

    • @user-mm8ru1iy2k
      @user-mm8ru1iy2k 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@moonaka2 what about animal rights
      Why not biocracy

    • @moonaka2
      @moonaka2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-mm8ru1iy2k The promotion of human welfare, or "Humanitarianism" doesn't require a demotion of the importance of animal welfare. Checkmate

  • @andyhandy9977
    @andyhandy9977 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Today capitalism is followed by almost every country ...capitalism divides the rich and poor..it's increases the GAP between poor and rich so much..it's not the best way

    • @robertdowneyjr7903
      @robertdowneyjr7903 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      bro equality is a myth ik i sound wrong but it is true no one can function in an equal society its not possible

    • @kanishkmod
      @kanishkmod ปีที่แล้ว +28

      We don't need an equal society we need a justifiable society

    • @shlokyadav348
      @shlokyadav348 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Dude no one is created no one the myth that everyone is equal is absolutely BS no one is equal in captalism if you want to come under 5% of rich people you have to try new ideas be innovative and smart.

    • @googleuser6894
      @googleuser6894 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@robertdowneyjr7903 Absolutely. It is artificial, unnatural. Even in the nature u will not see equality. The best hunter animal survives, the best tree survives. It's just a rosy sweet idea which feels good only on paper. In reality everyone wants to succeed, go ahead, want more. It's a human nature. If u give a person rice, tomorrow he will want roti, next he will want paneer, next he will want gulab jamun, next he will want more than one sabjis etc. Growth is natural process. All cannot be kept poor or on equal salary/money.

    • @holod3380
      @holod3380 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@shlokyadav348 This is naive, in order to become rich, first of all, you need not an idea, but capital. You live in a myth that anyone can become rich.

  • @onwaytooffroad
    @onwaytooffroad ปีที่แล้ว

    urdu hindi ma b bna do podcast

  • @kameshjagtap207
    @kameshjagtap207 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Capitalism is creation of wealth
    Communism is distribution of wealth

    • @josethomas8274
      @josethomas8274 ปีที่แล้ว

      Capitalism is creation of wealth.
      Communism/ Socialism is destruction of wealth.

    • @yashwant675
      @yashwant675 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Jab wealth banegi nahi to distribute kya karoge 😂😂

    • @pduttagupta
      @pduttagupta 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@yashwant675 banegi par sabko equal milega

    • @gauraveshwar
      @gauraveshwar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pduttaguptaKaun banayega?

    • @akashmaurya7676
      @akashmaurya7676 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@gauraveshwar hard work karne waala wealth banayegaa aur ghar baithne waala hard work karne waale ka wealth khaayega - communism in short.

  • @KedarJugdar
    @KedarJugdar หลายเดือนก่อน

    Socialism - Property can be taken by state. ??
    WAFQ Board laughing from the corner 😂😂

  • @zoelambch9932
    @zoelambch9932 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍

  • @azazulhaque8932
    @azazulhaque8932 ปีที่แล้ว

    mehnatkash mazdoor zindabad

  • @abhaswasnik7337
    @abhaswasnik7337 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Ranveer please stick to Semen retention and NoFap education, you exploring any domain outside of this is harmful to the political discourse

  • @M3ganwillslay
    @M3ganwillslay 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Aleays remember christians gave education to hindus .
    Brahmins oppressed and made sure hindus never get educated and never moved up in social hierachy .

  • @Padmashri-kh2oy
    @Padmashri-kh2oy ปีที่แล้ว

    5:08 lollll

  • @josephsego1095
    @josephsego1095 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've never heard a valid argument in favor of capitalism. Proponents of capitalism only ever try to implement gaslighting and/or logical fallacies. Really. Try to have a sane, civil, honest conversation with any proponent of capitalism, and they'll prove my point.
    But if you like all manner products within the capitalst matrix, if you own a business, and have employees. and you still want a much more sane and harmonious economic system, You're Not A Fucking Hypocrite.
    Don't let them silence you with that weak argument .
    It would be just as ridiculous to argue that one is a hypocrite for drinking city tap water, when they had no other options , and therefore one shouldn't be able consider better sources of water.
    Narcissistic personality disorder is an epedemic.
    And when they project "well the problem is nobody wants to work. " Ask them what landlords even fucking do . Ask them what the CEO of Starbucks actually does . Etc.
    No shade at seasons of nondoership. But shade @ projection.

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Landlords were literally focking around in the town, birthing children out of a wedlock. Starbucks CEO does exactly the same, while also spending a few minutes thinking about improving the business. That is a lot of hard work brother.

  • @picaachu7172
    @picaachu7172 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    become begger if you are so good

  • @Moonuuu
    @Moonuuu ปีที่แล้ว +16

    90% successful country follow capitalism.

    • @SATYA-31
      @SATYA-31 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And there 90% wealth hold by 1% people 😂

    • @Moonuuu
      @Moonuuu ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@SATYA-31 Their per capita is much far higher then socialist country who is mostly poor expect some natural resources country.

    • @Moonuuu
      @Moonuuu ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@SATYA-31 and see South Korea and North Korea one follow capitalism one socialist

    • @whitebarackobama7999
      @whitebarackobama7999 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Moonuuu who said to you nk is socialist?Do they equally distribute money to all people?only their party members are rich..Just like businessman in capitalism

    • @whitehavencpu6813
      @whitehavencpu6813 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@whitebarackobama7999 "only their party members are rich" that is the feature of socialism lmao. Only the government is rich.

  • @nikitasharma3752
    @nikitasharma3752 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    sovereign socialist secular democratic republic

  • @nitishcarlin1926
    @nitishcarlin1926 ปีที่แล้ว

    Exploitation of classes will never stop.

  • @invalidaccount6147
    @invalidaccount6147 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    No knowledge just bla bla bla.
    One dislike from here

  • @blckut9391
    @blckut9391 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very wrong defination

  • @shivam-wx4sz
    @shivam-wx4sz ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Video ka premiere to khatam hone do

  • @memewala8337
    @memewala8337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    is mahaan vyakti ko preamble of constitution ka pata nahi aur chale hai gyaan dene desho ka 🤣🤣 kya guest aate hai yaar

  • @thebadnamepoet580
    @thebadnamepoet580 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Capitalism vs socialism - basic difference who owns the means of production

  • @knowpedia9896
    @knowpedia9896 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fake wold , true man

    • @devarya9764
      @devarya9764 ปีที่แล้ว

      But vice versa is true

  • @iceape5250
    @iceape5250 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro should get a better set of chairs. The way you're sitting looks so uncomfortable and conjusted

  • @Palash_aar_Putush
    @Palash_aar_Putush ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very poorly explained, I have to say 😢😂.

  • @slavman1945
    @slavman1945 ปีที่แล้ว

    Explain whats libertarianism

    • @theardentreader1984
      @theardentreader1984 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      The common thing about communism and liberatianism is both sounds good on paper.

    • @googleuser6894
      @googleuser6894 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theardentreader1984 Haha. Exactly. 😂👍👍

    • @loggygaming2112
      @loggygaming2112 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theardentreader1984 it works in reality as well Stalin made USSR a industrial superpower

    • @Enlightened23
      @Enlightened23 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@loggygaming2112 but people dont have right that time. people were not happy .state was rich but people were still poor . beleive me u cant live in authotainian state, do u even know how much of people he had k-illed?

    • @ribhavdubey2733
      @ribhavdubey2733 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Enlightened23 ppl were unhappy?
      When the ussr broke up 77 % of the people were against it.

  • @aryansingh-ne9je
    @aryansingh-ne9je ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Socialism is the intermediary stage for a transition to a communist utopia. And speaking so much about power-hungry people, what do you think capitalism has no goons? all these prominent industrialists, big business families like tata, Ambani, Adani or Godrej upon their collection and overexploitation of resources, environment, workers and whatnot to build the empire we see today. Most of that wealth goes within the corporation or the owner or the shareholders but if we talk about the real stakeholders of the industry are only ripped off. They control the government by funding, lobbying etc. while making and holding most of the wealth there in the country. Oligarchy in Russia was only possible because of the collapse of the soviet union!

    • @anshumanjaiswal5787
      @anshumanjaiswal5787 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agree . But what to do next?

    • @whitehavencpu6813
      @whitehavencpu6813 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So rich people in a corrupt socialist country is an example of Capitalism? i'm willing to bet all those people got rich with the help of government, not through capitalism.

    • @nisthabhattacharya4854
      @nisthabhattacharya4854 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly...fine let's accept communism is dictatorship... atleast they do it on face not under a blanket...in this country only 2% of the population hold the country's wealth and also the country with highest number of poor people...and communists are dictators😂😂...and even in developed capitalist countries...they have the same issue...idk if communists do not at all think about it's people...but capitalist definitely do not...and yes a mixed model should be adopted...not extreme of anything.

  • @kavyabhandari5865
    @kavyabhandari5865 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Capitalism is important for country growth but there should not be blind capitalism as blind capitalism lead to supression of poor and socially weak .

    • @gauraveshwar
      @gauraveshwar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No it does not

    • @kavyabhandari5865
      @kavyabhandari5865 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gauraveshwar how Blind Captialism is good for society ?

  • @jascam1
    @jascam1 ปีที่แล้ว

    In a perfect world Communism could be the order of the day, however the human animal being what they are will easily take the “ to each according to his needs” path rather than break one bead of sweat.

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      One of the most critical developments in science today, are not coming from private, but the public funding and govt owned organizations. Ever heard of CERN? Yeah, the Europeans and Americans would lecture the world to make the government spending to be as low as possible, while they are making huge govt spending on particle critical technologies.

  • @rahulkailad8621
    @rahulkailad8621 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Concept explain karna tha 🤦‍♂️. Ye kya hai

  • @nidhisharma8514
    @nidhisharma8514 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The worst explanation ever! The speaker might have a very good knowledge on the subject but does not know how to explain it to the people at all. Anyone who is looking for the EASIEST explanation will never understand anything from this video.
    This explanation might have worked for those who already had some knowledge of the topic but surely not for someone who is a newbie here.

  • @Republic_on_March
    @Republic_on_March ปีที่แล้ว

    Not a good explanation...

  • @yatindawra770
    @yatindawra770 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bhai yeh kuch bhi bole deta hai. This ain’t legit. This wannabe self professed physics guru is just the manifestation of intellectual ineptitude taking advantage of a gullible, though sometimes equally inept, audience.

  • @SATYA-31
    @SATYA-31 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Capitalism- for rich peoples
    Communism- for peoples

    • @Aegon_Targaryen
      @Aegon_Targaryen ปีที่แล้ว +7

      North Korea vs South Korea
      Which is better to live????
      USA vs USSR who won coldwar??

    • @Cryingwhore
      @Cryingwhore ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This is what happens when you believe anything blatantly.

    • @rahilvig8185
      @rahilvig8185 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂😂😂 Yes I rather live in North Korea than South Korea.

    • @morningstararun6278
      @morningstararun6278 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@rahilvig8185 Would you rather live in Haiti or Cuba?

  • @officialaccount-xf9gm
    @officialaccount-xf9gm 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    India is secular socialtist soverign democractic republic , not spirit and all😂😂 this happens when there is a discussion between science and commerce , dont underrate arts