Why These Basements Are Taking Over London

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 พ.ค. 2024
  • Skip the waitlist and invest in blue-chip art for the very first time by signing up for Masterworks: masterworks.art/obf
    Purchase shares in great masterpieces from artists like Pablo Picasso, Banksy, Andy Warhol, and more.
    How Masterworks works:
    -Create your account with your traditional bank account
    -Pick major works of art to invest in or our new blue-chip diversified art portfolio
    -Identify investment amount
    -Hold shares in works by Picasso or trade them in our secondary marketplace
    See important Masterworks disclosures: www.masterworks.io/about/disc...
    Why These Basements Are Taking Over London
    Support me on Patreon:
    / oliverbahl
    Follow me on Twitter:
    / bahlfranke
    Link to sources:
    docs.google.com/document/d/1i...

ความคิดเห็น • 434

  • @OBFYT
    @OBFYT  2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Skip the waitlist and invest in blue-chip art for the very first time by signing up for Masterworks:
    masterworks.art/obf

    • @jakobh3718
      @jakobh3718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Use metric please

    • @hallowedproductions3334
      @hallowedproductions3334 ปีที่แล้ว

      This man literally has no idea about London its almost hilarious./

  • @napoleonibonaparte7198
    @napoleonibonaparte7198 2 ปีที่แล้ว +891

    While the Dutch build walls to keep water out, the British are digging to let the water in.

    • @richardcope8102
      @richardcope8102 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      We don't really want water ingress into such homes, however it is a building hazard for such Iceberg houses.

    • @richardcope8102
      @richardcope8102 2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      The Dutch are real smart people and have a long history of managing hydro-dynamics !

    • @thomasdehaan7058
      @thomasdehaan7058 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@richardcope8102 and they make good music and good haze

    • @daic7274
      @daic7274 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      If someone can afford such houses and development then they can also afford the best available tanking and waterproofing. It is moderately easy to provide external waterproofing to the concrete structure to resist water pressure.

    • @richardcope8102
      @richardcope8102 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thomasdehaan7058 Purple haze ?

  • @danunpronounceable8559
    @danunpronounceable8559 2 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    As a geotechnical engineer, I want to add that London clay has such a low permeability it is considered impermeable, which means that it does not absorb water. So water already has nowhere to go in London, other than watercourses. This is why London floods with high rainfall, because it is almost completely dependent on surface water drainage which flows into rivers which can get overwhelmed. Concrete basements will not change this fact.

  • @mfaizsyahmi
    @mfaizsyahmi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +381

    Clay soils are actually virtually impermeable. It's because how the very fine particles are packed makes water's passage through it awfully slow. In fact I think the iceberg basements would become more like literal icebergs when it comes to severe flooding:- it could cause the whole structure to float and then crash into the neighbouring buildings.

    • @lonestarr1490
      @lonestarr1490 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Will they honk a ship's horn right before impact?

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@lonestarr1490 If the house is a Dutch design? Yes it will ...

    • @yushajadoon
      @yushajadoon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I only liked your comment because you took the time to write this all.

    • @edwardevans9162
      @edwardevans9162 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Water retention will also depend on compaction

    • @HappyfoxBiz
      @HappyfoxBiz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      if that were true then the French wouldn't have a problem with a flooding train station, they would just line it with clay, but instead they have water seepage still and they built a station close to the river and a tunnel through the river.
      The simple solution to keeping aquifers out of your home is not to dig deep near aquifers and underground water.

  • @Ruds-lj8tr
    @Ruds-lj8tr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +353

    As someone who lives near London, I find the prospect of the city slowly sinking rather scary.

    • @woodenlobster
      @woodenlobster 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Give Jakarta a visit, you'll hate it more

    • @SSS-sz8mg
      @SSS-sz8mg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Happy for you :)

    • @seadrown6252
      @seadrown6252 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I think it's quite cool tbh

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just like you fear the Dutch. They been sinking for centuries with no problems. And they could totally sail up the Thames with their warships. Which they would do if the Queen was still able to bend the knee.

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@woodenlobster I would bring in the orang belanda. But that is just water mismanagement. All you need to do is ... stop doing that.
      Or build a sea wall in the shape of a big garuda.

  • @dharmilp
    @dharmilp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    This is very common in NYC, most owners of historic homes build below ground since they cannot remodel the existing structures. I work on the excavation systems to build below these homes

  • @ARN012
    @ARN012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    Feels like London is slowly going towards becoming UnLondon

    • @Kappa7837
      @Kappa7837 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      True

    • @charlestonianbuilder344
      @charlestonianbuilder344 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      thats what im thinking of a far flung future of london, underground cities covered with an ancient historical surface

    • @joelstephenson8017
      @joelstephenson8017 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      builder that actually sounds dope

    • @charlestonianbuilder344
      @charlestonianbuilder344 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joelstephenson8017 yeah, where it would have a stark contrast to the futuristic cities around the globe, afew cities in europe managed to keep their cities intact for centuries and managed to keep it that way, instead expanding deep underground not only to preserve the historical city but also for the possibility of nuclear war and stuff, with several levels interconnected basements and underground malls and highways

    • @ARN012
      @ARN012 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      All y'all didn't get the reference.

  • @Zed_Oud
    @Zed_Oud 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    One thing ignored is the fact that’s it’s *feasible* to build basements in London. It’s seismically stable.

    • @TrevorWilliams-fq8mg
      @TrevorWilliams-fq8mg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Biggest basement in Europe was built under the British Library in London. The size of a football pitch and 10 storey's deep.

  • @samehedi
    @samehedi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    your ads keep getting too mixed up in the video. a good segue is good but it should be clear when the content stops and the ad starts. otherwise good content as always!

    • @danieldeburgh8437
      @danieldeburgh8437 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Segue

    • @samehedi
      @samehedi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@danieldeburgh8437 oh god, i never knew but always wondered about the word, thanks, i fixed it

    • @sontyt2744
      @sontyt2744 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Get a premium account

    • @samehedi
      @samehedi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​@@sontyt2744 we're talking about in video ads

    • @jk-gb4et
      @jk-gb4et 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sontyt2744 he is talking about sponsorships

  • @chestnut4860
    @chestnut4860 2 ปีที่แล้ว +177

    Underground construction is the shit. Space for humans while still allowing room for nature with potential wild life crossings, geotermal heating, shelter for the elements. I remember walking around campus on uni during shit weather wondering why the hell we didnt have underground passage ways only to find out some places have borderline underground cities.

    • @li_tsz_fung
      @li_tsz_fung 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Those massive underground malls are probably much better planned. But those people building under their plot don't care about the place around them

    • @ninakoch1799
      @ninakoch1799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      but i dont wanna live underground :( i want my vitamin D

    • @jakobhahn8043
      @jakobhahn8043 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      not really... if you consider the amount of engergy you have to use to excavate these massive amounts of soil, it is much more damaging to the enviroment than living on the surface

    • @Embassy_of_Jupiter
      @Embassy_of_Jupiter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Beijing has an underground city because they feared a war with Russia, if I remember correctly.
      I think Shenzhen too because of district cooling.

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow couldn't figure out how a poncho works? Not able to deal with the elements after millions of years of evolution ...
      New levels of woke are seen!

  • @mtmadigan82
    @mtmadigan82 2 ปีที่แล้ว +127

    I actually warched a video on this from a construction company specializing in this. It looked like a nightmare. The manpower and time was eyewatering. They essentially tore the interior apart until it was just the historical shell. Dug down. Poured more concrete footings/walls. Dug down more did the same. And it wasnt a dig it all down at once. You had to split walls into 4 areas. Youd dig number 1 down, pored concrete, digout 2 pour concrete etc. So it was like a 4x as long time frame. Then...then you can start the interior. Its cool but just amazing cost. If you want to feel better, in los angles the prices are nuts. Guys buy these little bungalows to tear down and build mcmansions. Not on the water or even good areas. Like 1/2 acre lots, 1500 sq foot bungalow that would be 100k rest of the country. These guys are buying them for a million plus. And theres bidding wars. For a house theyll bulldoze just want the land. Its nuts.

    • @jaxstax2406
      @jaxstax2406 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      No one wants to live in the middle of nowhere if they can afford it.

    • @user-su4dd9kp7l
      @user-su4dd9kp7l 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@jaxstax2406
      Wouldn’t say no one, middle of nowhere is better than most American cities

    • @jaxstax2406
      @jaxstax2406 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@user-su4dd9kp7l that's what you think.

    • @AustinPerdue
      @AustinPerdue 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I'm more a fan of middle of nowhere myself. mike M, would you believe, even many of the areas around the Detroit metro are getting to be 1mil+ for 1/2 acre? Arguably the worst city in the US, a metro without a real anchoring urban area, is seeing those kinds of prices. Granted, you can still find 150k homes in areas with flooding, high crime and bad schools.

    • @cdl0
      @cdl0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jaxstax2406 One of my friends in London built a basement. It is not what I would do: I live in the middle of nowhere, because it is what I want. I can't bear London.

  • @nadeemchaudhry6585
    @nadeemchaudhry6585 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Interesting video,albeit slightly flawed..
    London is full of high rise buildings and skyscrapers.
    Also, the basement builds are in most part part financial viable, with basement build costs ranging from £600/sqft- £1500/sqft and sales prices in some of the areas you mentioned over £2000/sqft, its rarely a loss making exercise

    • @toby319
      @toby319 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It annoys me that valid criticism like this is often ignored

    • @rrecee2639
      @rrecee2639 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's social and civil vandalism even if the monetary value is increased.

    • @ange_109
      @ange_109 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But high rise buildings tend to be built either in low socioeconomic areas or in already existing high rise zones e.g. Canary wharf/ city of London and now the new Nine Elms

    • @christianwestling2019
      @christianwestling2019 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rrecee2639 "Social vandalism"? How are you affected by someone building a big basement?

    • @samsmith4242
      @samsmith4242 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@christianwestling2019 if they are doing it next to your house

  • @christianhumer3084
    @christianhumer3084 2 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    1. How can that water drain, when everything is concrete? Does London build pipes that let the water into the ground anyway?
    2. Building a Basement is not bad in my opinion. Sure, it needs to be constructed, but it isn´t seen from the outside as compensation.
    3. It also reduces Land Use by being at site instead somewhere where a Road is needed.
    4. When Water cant infiltrate into the ground anyway, how would building a basement affect the fact that London is sinking?

    • @evannibbe9375
      @evannibbe9375 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Theoretically, if the excavated material is used to build up the ground level around the Thames, then building basements could reduce flooding.

    • @christianhumer3084
      @christianhumer3084 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@evannibbe9375 Its more complicated than that. You must prevent water from entering through the ground.

    • @markhellings4203
      @markhellings4203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Sand takes in water
      Bacement = less sand
      Less sand= more surface water
      More surface water = higher chance of a flood

    • @christianhumer3084
      @christianhumer3084 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@markhellings4203 According to this video, London is located on Clay, not Sand.

    • @markhellings4203
      @markhellings4203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@christianhumer3084 the only difference between clay and sand is the grain size. With clay's grain size being smaller it can take in even more water. So removing clay instead of sand is actually worse

  • @aymanla471
    @aymanla471 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    1:38 ''london has so few skyscrapers'' LOL

  • @jaxstax2406
    @jaxstax2406 2 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    People make basements in these areas should pay a fee to the government to help build more drainage for the city.

    • @JohnDoe-xj1fv
      @JohnDoe-xj1fv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Brilliant

    • @Ella-ks7jp
      @Ella-ks7jp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      clearly they'd be able to afford it!

    • @dapper_gent
      @dapper_gent 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, the stench of communism needs to make more leaps and bounds.

    • @jaxstax2406
      @jaxstax2406 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dapper_gent what does that even mean?

  • @LanternOfLiberty
    @LanternOfLiberty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    When Speer was building test sections of the underground road that would make Germanias Axis car-free, they had major problems with the marshy Berlin soil.

  • @HYDRAdude
    @HYDRAdude 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    It seems like the real issue here is wealthy distribution and not zoning restrictions.

    • @jonathanodude6660
      @jonathanodude6660 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      those building companies would have to make a fortune doing this. im no trickle-down supporter but lets be real, they must be paying their engineers crazy salaries to do this kinda extremely labour intensive work for multiple years. would be incredibly stable employment and would definitely assist in getting the rich to share their wealth back into the economy.

    • @WhichDoctor1
      @WhichDoctor1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@jonathanodude6660 They are doing this because they know that no matter how much they spend, they will end up many times that amount richer afterwards. Whatever wealth is "redistributed" the gap in wealth will still grow Wider. Thats why trickle down doesn't work. The majority of the value of the work being done isn't past on to the people actually doing the work. So the more value ordinary people create through their work, the bigger the gap in wealth between them and the people who own the things they create becomes. Its trickle up economics, always has been.

    • @heretohear1847
      @heretohear1847 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The zoning restrictions allow for the wealthy to distribute their wealth unfairly, while the wealthy protect these laws to keep house prices high and unchanging in london

  • @ph11p3540
    @ph11p3540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    In Canada, there are severe restrictions on building basements past 3 meters in depth. The issue is a combination of shallow bedrock called shield rock and then there is a requirement that any inhabited room must have a window for escape. No windows from the basement means it's strictly for storage. Windowless basement windows cannot be used for a home theater, hobby room, rumpus room and especially bed rooms

    • @furkankurtuluss
      @furkankurtuluss 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Makes a lot of sense

    • @fireincarnation2
      @fireincarnation2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Should be OK with 2 exits of any kind. Like an extra door and staircase. Or do Fire supression like the French.

    • @nofurtherwest3474
      @nofurtherwest3474 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You could build an exit for all the floors.

    • @rrecee2639
      @rrecee2639 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds sensible.

    • @ydk1k253
      @ydk1k253 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Escaping from bears?

  • @sambrusco672
    @sambrusco672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I suppose they could build a slurry wall for the 4 walls of the basement, and then dig out the hole in the middle. This is how they did The Big Dig in Boston. • • • • • • • •
    BUT you will NEVER keep all the water out. The interior finish walls need to be separated (an air gap) from the foundation walls. This will allow water that finds its way through the concrete (and it will!) to flow down to the sub-sub-sub-sub-basement. There you will have a sump system BELOW the bottom floor of living space. That ground water would then be pumped to the surface. • • • • • • • •
    The interior walls will also need closed cell insulation so moisture does not create mold in the living space.• • • • • • • •
    I did something similar in my own basement, on a MUCH smaller scale, without digging down. The insulated interior walls and basement floor are separated from the concrete surfaces. Water is allowed to migrate.• • • • • • • •
    Easy-peasy!!

  • @simonsaysno
    @simonsaysno 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    1:36 Actually, London has the second most skyscrapers of any European city. Had it been part of the US it would have been placed fifth, ahead of cities such as San Francisco and Los Angeles...

  • @tomarmstrong1297
    @tomarmstrong1297 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Far out, that transition to the plug for masterworks was slick.

  • @osx86x
    @osx86x 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I came across your channel and found your accent and enunciation of words make it easy and hard to follow at the same time

  • @jimmiller5600
    @jimmiller5600 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    NHS is starved for funds. Rich aren't taxed very much, judging from their spending. Ideas? Anyone?

    • @daic7274
      @daic7274 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, but my comment would probably be deleted by youtube. I agree, it is an appalling situation.

    • @jimmiller5600
      @jimmiller5600 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@daic7274 About 100 years ago the US political leadership reined in the super-rich with Income and Estate taxes. Those tax revenues built "the American Century". Since the 1980's the US has cut taxes on the rich and gone deeper into debt. Some things are just obvious, and ignored.

    • @jimmiller5600
      @jimmiller5600 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@massimilianoferrari7860 You really need to go back to elementary school for math. It wasn't "big taxing" for regular people. It was Income and Estate taxes on the top 1% of the population. You can't tell the difference between 99 versus 1? LOL.

  • @morriskaller3549
    @morriskaller3549 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    London has few skyscrapers? Have you even been there, it's one of the cities in Europe with the most skyscrapers

    • @thunder_2124
      @thunder_2124 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Probably from an American perspective

    • @henrytudor8537
      @henrytudor8537 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      It is the most. But for USA or China, it doesnt have as much.

  • @uaskcred
    @uaskcred 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    it is pronounced Ful-am, the 'h' is silent. Also, this sitaution is not only happening in "elite" neighbourhoods, it's happening all across the city. Bear in mind that london is extremely corrupt so this also factors in when analysing the rise of these buildings

  • @joonaslaakkonen8624
    @joonaslaakkonen8624 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video and I learned a lot from that. I'm the type of guy who would really appreciate having multiple stories or rooms for different things so I can leave things around and go do other things at the same time. I also like underground buildings because they feel safe and cozy.
    Btw there is a spelling mistake st the end "Thanks for Wathcing" instead of watching.

  • @zodiac457
    @zodiac457 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    I love these vids so much information that little to no one talks about

  • @douglaserwinbrandt181
    @douglaserwinbrandt181 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This creating residental spaces below homes and buildings has been going on in the large US cities for many many decades. There are multiple basement levels under lots of the row homes in NYC. They are being made into the same kind of spaces you are saying are being created in London. Difference is that th these basement levels are existing spaces from when the buildings were built.

  • @margomaybe7570
    @margomaybe7570 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Seems like a fire hazard. Would love a video of how they mitigate the insane safety risks of building underground with no easy exits or ventilation.

    • @aristtara006
      @aristtara006 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I don't think these owners would spend a lot of time in the basement. It's likely mostly for entertainment, maybe they only go down once a week or something. It's hard to die because of fire down there.

    • @eldromedario3315
      @eldromedario3315 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@aristtara006 doesn't mean there's no need to think about fire escapes or safety in general, against any disasters

    • @insertphrasehere15
      @insertphrasehere15 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I mean... not really. What is going to burn? Everything structural is concrete and steel.

    • @margomaybe7570
      @margomaybe7570 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@insertphrasehere15 fire protocols are more about people getting trapped/suffocation/ventilation/etc... that's why we enforce windows and fire escapes for multi-story buildings. If anything happened above they don't exactly have options, and all those things below will be producing fumes. Pools? Garages? Gyms? Gonna get muggy down there real quick.

  • @Belihoney
    @Belihoney 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Green infrastructure (suds) and biophillic design is the only thing that really offset this issue imo

  • @tactinuke7172
    @tactinuke7172 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    how is this channel not getting a million subs? the videos are amazing!

  • @TheSofajockey
    @TheSofajockey 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Curious about egress from these dungeons. I'm assuming there are regulations that provide for escape options in case of emergencies?

  • @ananrs8750
    @ananrs8750 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ah yeah people building 5 story underground houses and here I am not even able to afford a studio flag in London

  • @user-gq2vn1xj2r
    @user-gq2vn1xj2r 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Fractional artwork ownership. This is the peak.

  • @SmokeKinz
    @SmokeKinz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What programs do you use for your videos? They are beautiful.

  • @reesericdotci
    @reesericdotci 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you for wathcing - lol great vid as always!

  • @martinclarke974
    @martinclarke974 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I see my hometown of Brisbane appeared in the flooding portion at 7:51!

  • @jimh781
    @jimh781 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Perhaps Paris wasn’t the best example of this phenomenon not occurring in Europe on account of the catacombs.

    • @Valentin-oc5nh
      @Valentin-oc5nh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      literally has nothing to do with that

    • @eldromedario3315
      @eldromedario3315 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Valentin-oc5nh it is underground, a lot of it, all below paris. ur just being nit-picky and overly pedantic

    • @Valentin-oc5nh
      @Valentin-oc5nh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@eldromedario3315 no lol. its different as no one is living there

  • @MrDevinthe
    @MrDevinthe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Please make one on Jakarta, Indonesia soon ✌

  • @monad_tcp
    @monad_tcp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why didn't anyone though in just keeping UV lights powered behind the walls to keep moss from growing ?

  • @tomkandy
    @tomkandy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    London is "infamously rainy" only in the eyes of clueless tourists. It gets about 550mm of rain a year, less than Berlin, Paris, Barcelona, Vienna, Lisbon or Rome.

    • @Tonyx.yt.
      @Tonyx.yt. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yep, around 600mm year, less than a good portion of Europe.
      here in central Alps is 850/900mm, but unlike London usualy didnt rain at all for a couple of months, but during some periods of the year it rain for even a couple of days.

  • @tsbrownie
    @tsbrownie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Let's ignore the damp and dark. London's water table is around 45 meters and rising 3 meters a year (because of the cession of ground water pumping). At almost 30 meters deep these houses are 15 years away from water reaching the lowest floors. After that, pumps will have to be run constantly to keep the lower levels from flooding. Keeping valuables down there is a guaranteed loser over time, plus flooding means weakened/shifting foundations.

    • @nofurtherwest3474
      @nofurtherwest3474 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      i call BS. show me a link where it says its rising 3 meters a year.

    • @Jesse-jp8bt
      @Jesse-jp8bt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Show me a link too

    • @TrevorWilliams-fq8mg
      @TrevorWilliams-fq8mg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Water table 45 metres deep and basement 30 metres deep ? Are you sure you don't mean 30/45 feet deep ? I have worked on lots of projects in London and have frequently seen references to a water table in the geotechnical surveys at much shallower depths. And a 30 metre deep basement would give you 10 floors. The surcharge loading on the perimeter retaining wall would be huge probably requiring a diaphragm wall which can only be installed using a crane at ground level.

  • @notharry9328
    @notharry9328 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice Video!

  • @margomaybe7570
    @margomaybe7570 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    And what if the new owners don't want that space below? On normal properties if there's portions of the house or other structures you don't want, you can just tear it down and get rid of all the material. What happens to unused concrete caverns below?

  • @Hamsteak
    @Hamsteak 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I've always wanted a underground house

  • @brunoglopes
    @brunoglopes 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damn that was the smoothest transition to a sponsor I have ever seen

  • @CoFutures
    @CoFutures 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    An underground, indoor tennis court... 🤔 Just thinking about the engineering to construct all these basement extensions is truly mind boggling!

  • @bocamax
    @bocamax 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @1:04 "This certainly isn't happening in New York". Nearly 100% of homes in New York have basements while less than 1% have them in London.

  • @vmcla
    @vmcla 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You say the Thames barrier has been “overused”. What do you mean by that?

  • @QUANT_PAPA
    @QUANT_PAPA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you finaly expended your home underground you wanne rilex, meanwhile you neighbour just start building, and you still 1 -2 year in loud drilling sound XD

  • @ninakoch1799
    @ninakoch1799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    who would want to live underground though if they have a choice?! not seeing sunlight/natural light is my worst nightmare. i could never work at an airport or inside a big shopping mall, let alone live somewhere with no windows

    • @sanketgarg1731
      @sanketgarg1731 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      exactly. living underground is rather super scary for me. i cant even imagine living like this.

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My nightmare is garlic so its nice to live underground.
      9 month deployment on a submarine hmmm ...
      You really going to open a windown? Lmao!

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sanketgarg1731 Couldn't care less but the design is literally letting people live above while all the fancy pools and garages are below.
      But hey you can proof read and fact check the Mars Biome human experiments? Massive spaces but incases in clear glass domes and ... they went completely mad inside it.

    • @TheBuckweat33
      @TheBuckweat33 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If it didnt stink and the air was breathable I could so dig it.

    • @fairyheli2
      @fairyheli2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nobody's living in any of these places. Why rich people waste so much money on this is beyond me

  • @kaidyno4480
    @kaidyno4480 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Imagine spending 10 years in litigation just to build a basement

  • @SordMasta
    @SordMasta 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i could not agree more with all the strict architectural codes of europe.
    it is not just easthetically nice, but it is also important for many reasons.

  • @yourguy382
    @yourguy382 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There are regulations now preventing builds of more than one storey deep and it's extremely onerous to get these jobs approved by councils.

  • @yengsabio5315
    @yengsabio5315 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wonder how much will it cost to air-condition the house down under.

    • @sauceover
      @sauceover 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not much? It would be insulated by the ground. So very likely cheaper than the above ground portion

  • @DaironLoL
    @DaironLoL 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you find these topics to make videos about?

  • @growdaddy4281
    @growdaddy4281 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    7:49 thats definitely Australia lmao

  • @GOKU-cj7yu
    @GOKU-cj7yu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Master works!!!

  • @CursedQuest
    @CursedQuest 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Unlondon is finally becoming a real
    Someone go wake up the SCP facility to get ready

  • @raphlvlogs271
    @raphlvlogs271 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why are basements common in developed cities in the UK but rare in the suburbs and smaller towns

    • @TY-sx3jb
      @TY-sx3jb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not needed in the suburbs and smaller towns due to more land and lower land costs

  • @tristan3104
    @tristan3104 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about sunlight tho?

  • @yunusjauhari
    @yunusjauhari 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4 Mei
    22:00 Nonton TH-cam Shorts 22:02 Turun kebawah kekamar Mandi Main IG 22:16 OBF Why These Basements Are Taking Over London 22:22 Pause TH-cam Turun kebawah Kekamar Mandi BAB gak bisa di flush Naik keatas Cek Jam 22:33 Lanjut Nonton Menit 6;13 an

  • @TVfridge23
    @TVfridge23 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    9:24 Interesting way to spell "Watching"

  • @orsaz924
    @orsaz924 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's a useless thing to point out but, I've never been this early to an OBF video

  • @SlverNexus
    @SlverNexus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You lost me right at the end man. Don’t sound so defeated at the end of the video.

    • @joostiscool100
      @joostiscool100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it's the grim reality sadly

  • @henryaitken855
    @henryaitken855 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    did this man just call camden an elite neighborhood

  • @jmneo4635
    @jmneo4635 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Preparing for that Doomsday scenario. Noice.

    • @Sparticulous
      @Sparticulous 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Preparing for nuclear war

  • @Blaqjaqshellaq
    @Blaqjaqshellaq 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'll bet they got the idea from those hobbit burrows in the LORD OF THE RINGS movies...

  • @helmutzollner5496
    @helmutzollner5496 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    very interesting piece. but these iceberg homes can be the answer to the rising sea-levels. these homes have a lot kif positive bouncy. so they can just float up when the waters rise, 😂

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Never seen homes in the Netherlands do that?

    • @helmutzollner5496
      @helmutzollner5496 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrFlatage I have. That was the inspiration. But it is a funny image to see these iceberg homes go up and down like a yoyo.

  • @rrecee2639
    @rrecee2639 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    These iceberg homes should not be allowed by the local councils. Causes massive disruption to the neighbours and in the worst cases adjacent properties suffer (extreme) subsidence as the foundations are literally dug away by their neighbour's (con/de)struction team.

  • @DianaSubscribe
    @DianaSubscribe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm watching 1 Hour since uploaded

  • @bedri1
    @bedri1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh no the sealevel is rising!
    OBF: no wories, lets just regulate global Temperatures .
    Me: ??????

  • @kingoliever1
    @kingoliever1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Look at the FAQ of this Art stuff, sounds insane as they say fun stuff like we have an unproven businesses model. Would not be surprised if a lot of people lose money.

  • @andreyradchenko8200
    @andreyradchenko8200 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It all was started by eco crazies and their 'green belt' legislation. The city can't expand, but the populayion grows, and that forces it to grow vertically. Compare that to places like St Petersburg that are not bound by such lunacy, historic architecture doesn't get gutted or built over there.

  • @thegrumpydragon7601
    @thegrumpydragon7601 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful video

  • @_ruted
    @_ruted 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this what they call the london dungeons?

  • @SamirDutta02
    @SamirDutta02 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    One word answer: Colin Furze

  • @beachboy.kartik
    @beachboy.kartik 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Same with IQ

    • @worwor1721
      @worwor1721 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Building underground is the way forward lol

  • @J.singh.84
    @J.singh.84 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Someone play Rains of Castarmere and remind this town of Tywin Lannister.

  • @JScot92
    @JScot92 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    London has a relatively high number of skyscrapers by European standards though.

    • @JScot92
      @JScot92 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @Zaydan Naufal Nah London has way more than Frankfurt now.

    • @DDRWakaLaka
      @DDRWakaLaka 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      well. yes. "a handful" is certainly more than "none"

    • @tamaracarter1836
      @tamaracarter1836 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is because Europe does not build very many skyscrapers at all compared to the rest of the world (which is good in my opinion).

  • @thierryparte2506
    @thierryparte2506 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Imagine paying 2/5 mill for a 70+ year home, where the walls are so thin you can hear a neighbour plug in a charger

    • @tamaracarter1836
      @tamaracarter1836 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Homes built 100+ years ago are much better quality than homes built in the modern day. Walls would certainly not be paper thin.

    • @shivam.mishra7300
      @shivam.mishra7300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      U from America!?😂

  • @thomascrabtree
    @thomascrabtree 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    At the end you say "the land is theirs", but in the UK it isn't, only in the US... In the UK the "Crown" (Government) owns all soil & mineral rights, if you want to dig deeper you have to lease the rights from them.

  • @lornarana6880
    @lornarana6880 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow Interesting.

  • @blackbox8490
    @blackbox8490 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I don't understand rich people. They spend so much money on stuff they don't need while there are starving kids out there.

    • @eldromedario3315
      @eldromedario3315 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      the strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must.

  • @TheMaster4534
    @TheMaster4534 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Why are basements taking over London"
    Am I the only one who had a different thought in mind?

  • @youthgamngpatnerz3300
    @youthgamngpatnerz3300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    coz less space DUHH

  • @gavinchristiantoro
    @gavinchristiantoro 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Because the Mudflood isn't done with London yet!

  • @Steven-fv8xw
    @Steven-fv8xw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    to survive a nuclear war, we had to build the underground cities. what's more, we better build moon and mars colonies which could ultimately help humans rebuild civilizations after a full scale nuclear war on earth.

    • @daic7274
      @daic7274 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only the ultra rich and controlling people could or would be able to build on other moons or planets... I would rather take my chances of survival on earth after such an event than be shipped off to an artificial atmospheric dome run by the same people whose money most likely funded a nuclear war in the first place. It is the rich and greedy people that start wars in the first place. Nothing would be any different on another planet, if anything it would be worse.

  • @SlyJustChilling
    @SlyJustChilling 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    they cant have many skyscrapers so they build them the other way round lol

    • @ARN012
      @ARN012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Guess you can call them now Corescraper.

    • @SlyJustChilling
      @SlyJustChilling 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ARN012 nice

  • @travisshooks7374
    @travisshooks7374 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    To the ppl who think some basements will cause flooding. Why would the subway or hundreds of other underground structures not do the same.

    • @reknakfarg7252
      @reknakfarg7252 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      they do

    • @acorgiwithacrown467
      @acorgiwithacrown467 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      They literally do and they make take up a tiny majority of space under London, if tons more of these houses get built then flooding will be way way worse.

    • @Sparticulous
      @Sparticulous 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They have pumps.

    • @acorgiwithacrown467
      @acorgiwithacrown467 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Sparticulous Who? The billionaires or the regular people who will have to pump water to stop their house getting flood because some asshole wanted an underground car ferris wheel?

    • @Sparticulous
      @Sparticulous 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@acorgiwithacrown467 many subway systems have pumps. Especially nyc

  • @antoniousai1989
    @antoniousai1989 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Another proof that having money doesn't make you a valuable person. Who would choose to live like a rat only to own more things? GOSH

    • @siddharthgoyal4008
      @siddharthgoyal4008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Most of these underground floors are over 15ft height, have complex air systems to recycle all the air etc. It's all tacky yes, but these underground floors are pretty plush.

    • @chestnut4860
      @chestnut4860 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What do you mean? That's some weird superstition about underground areas.

    • @antoniousai1989
      @antoniousai1989 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chestnut4860 Yeah, it's totally superstition to despise a life without sunlight. Gosh, you're a weirdo

  • @nand87
    @nand87 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Alt title: Why London is tripping towards the hell

  • @L.M1792
    @L.M1792 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These constructionists are obviously total geniuses. Why not add filtration to the build?
    I tend to think London was better before it became an urban sprawl, when it was little hamlets interconnected by fields of green and smaller road systems.

  • @renaminginprogress6903
    @renaminginprogress6903 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yo that was a really slimy segue into your ad just my opinion

  • @ethanbrews
    @ethanbrews 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I pioneered this design years ago in Minecraft

  • @mtumasz
    @mtumasz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don’t think you actually own the land under your house in the UK

    • @daic7274
      @daic7274 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very good point, many places ground is owned by some rich land owner or land developer, to whom some rent of some sort is payed. Would be interesting to know more about ownership below ground. Although I suspect if one could afford such housing and development then most likely they could also afford for a loophole in archaic land law to be found and exploited to enable purchase of said land.

    • @cdl0
      @cdl0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Unless there is a covenant on the title deeds to the contrary, the freeholder does normally own the ground under the house in the UK. Houses with such subterranean covenants can be hard to sell.

  • @michelbruns
    @michelbruns 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "so few skyscrapers" london has a lot of skyscrapers for a european city

  • @mjgasiecki
    @mjgasiecki 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Basements are normal in the northern part of the US. Almost every home in Michigan has one so we can store all our shit lol

  • @dilbarkhan1662
    @dilbarkhan1662 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good

  • @1ousy
    @1ousy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That sponsorship segue is amazing