@Dobin Pantomine Horse there's no editing there, and even if he did not a crime to swear at police to give them the power to start a section 5 or 4a as he used. Easy £1000
That lying female cop should be fired immediately and the auditor can prove it. The cop should be fired also because he could have watched the video and dispelled hid suspicion! He would not watch the video before he got his details!
This is an excellent example of why there are no 'Good Apples'. The Police will always support their colleagues irrespective of the situation. They lie like cheap bedside rugs and they are all 'Rotten Apples'
How can she ever give evidence against anyone again. She cannot expect a judge or a jury to accept anything she says as a known liar. If she stitched anyone up then they should take this video as evidence and get their case re-opened!
Even if you had said piss off it wouldn't be a criminal offence if it wasn't near any of the public likely to cause distress and alarm. The lying sargent should be sacked or at least demoted.
That's not true just that the bar is higher. But being told to 'piss off' would hardly reach the standard of something in excess of what they are used to.
@@johnnyrichardson902 Swearing at police is no longer a crime because officers hear foul-mouthed abuse too often to be offended, a High Court judge has ruled. The landmark judgement came as Mr Justice Bean overturned a public order conviction of a young suspect who repeatedly used the F-word while being searched for drugs
It's crazy...the constant BS (and lies) you see from cops, their bosses and also the 'justice system' - and I'm referring to what I've witnessed here in Canada. Same BS in Britain it seems. Thanks for sharing! Watching from North Vancouver, Canada. Regards, Jules.
They don't even care that they're seen to be corrupt. The cop admitted he had no interest in seeing the evidence that the sergeant lied. He believed her 100% and totally ignored the argument of the auditor. That's discrimination. The fact that a sergeant lied in order to get a law abiding member of the public in trouble should be treated as a serious misdemeanour. I'm also concerned that a police officer thinks (quote) 'it's fine' that £1000 of public tax money is being wasted because of a lying sergeant and his incompetence to investigate properly. The body language of the female officer said it all. She was embarrassed, ashamed and guilty.
Actually, I've thought about this. She deliberately lied to get a colleague to go out and move you on or arrest you; he took her word and refused to investigate the allegation despite you saying you had proof she was lying. This amounts to conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and is a serious charge that carries a penalty of imprisonment. Base your complaint and civil suit on that and they should offer a settlement of at least £5000. You could even demand the CPS prosecute the both and take out a private prosecution if they refuse.
Wow, just wow. Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice by the police is a very serious offence and a career buster. He made several clear statements about what he was told by the female officer. She’s in massive bother
I hope she is in massive bother. The only problem is that WYP Professional Standards are employed to protect bent officers like her. I say bent because she has perverted the course of justice and used her position to breach NNY's human and legal rights. I hope this news event runs and runs. Yes she was annoyed he was legally flying a drone but to lie to two officers and get them complicit in her deception was out of order. She now becomes questionable as to other occasions when she has deliberately lied to get someone's details or get them arrested. She would do well to resign now.
Utterly disgusting, how many more lies on people has that plain clothed Sargent told. And clearly there are more than enough police who would blindly follow a lying cop's words even when recorded video evidence was offered for viewing several times, but the male officer new that to view the evidence would prove exactly how the female Sargent lied. No good cops. Great video, hope you complain and get some justice.
That police officer is telling lies, it doesn't matter how many offences anyone has committed, we all have a common law right to remain silent, and the police tell you that if they ever arrest you.
@@GH-lo8vl If you are arrested you are obliged to give details, however the cop knew that that's why he said you might. you could etc. and it's easy to stand on principles but a night in jail is a night in jail, and that happens, released next day no charges, its a corrupt system but its how they like it
@@robba1234 - The key word being "Obliged", It's not that it's a corrupt system, it's just that people do not know what "Governed by consent" actually means - COMMON LAW (Law of the land) - upheld by a police constable. No one is above common law, and those in breach of common law will be tried in a common law court before a jury of their peers. There must be a victim in common law and they do not need your name, as the victim and/or witnesses will point you out as being the perpetrator. Common law - 1 - You cannot hurt anyone 2 - You cannot steal anyone's property 3 - You cannot damage anyone's property 4 - You cannot defraud anyone 5 - You cannot commit breach of the peace towards anyone 6 - You cannot commit treason (or sedition), towards the crown. And that's common law ☝️, that's it and NOTHING ELSE. ACTS AND STATUTES OF PARLIAMENT (Commercial law, contract law, law of the sea, admiralty law) - upheld by a police officer (office, paperwork). Only applies to certain groups (Road Traffic Act applies to drivers of vehicles etc) and needs your consent to enforce it, of which they will try to get using legalease ("Do you understand" - meaning do you 'under stand' ((stand under)) my authority). They need your name to issue fines and court dates, (as "Mr Hate crime" can't point you out in court - and no court usher ever shouts out "Occupier to court one"), You are the only one who can give or confirm your name, so NEVER give it. Your answer to every question should be - "I retain my common law right to remain silent" Your answer to every request should be - "Under protest and duress" (They always "ask you" to do something rather than 'tell you' because then you've accepting their authority). Q - "What's your name?" A - "I retain my common law right to remain silent" Q - "What's your address?" A - "I retain my common law right to remain silent" Q - "If you don't tell me you'll be arrested" A - "I retain my common law right to remain silent" Q - "Well I'm arresting you blah blah blah, 'do you understand'?" A - "No I do not stand under your authority" Q - "Ok well do you want to come this way" A - "Under protest and duress" And before anyone points out that they can get your name from a driving license or passport etc, those are fraudulent documents created from a birth certificate that clearly states across the bottom - "A certificate is not evidence of identity". Let's not forget that the first thing a police constable says to you when he/she arrests you is - "You do not have to say anything", Because, believe it or not - YOU DON'T. You do NOT have to speak to a police constable. You do NOT have to speak to the desk sergeant at the police station. You do NOT have to have a police interview. You do NOT have to attend court. Exercise your God given inalienable common law rights, they're yours and cannot be taken away by anyone, especially by some police officer using his/her uniform to commit treason and fraud by acting as a government bailiff. Police constables swear an oath before God to serve the Monach and protect people and property. They DO NOT swear an oath to protect the government. They swear their oath raising their right hand, and if they went against an oath which they swear to in a court, they would receive two years for perjury.
@@robba1234 remain silent? or like I have done in the past tell the Custody sgt to f@ck right off I am not answering any of your fkin questions and not playing your little game. get the duty solicitor while I get my ed down in the cell, Oh and duty MO while your at it if your not too busy doing paperwork. I still have never been charged with anything, bunch of lying cnuts.
See this is why I have lost all respect for the police, that Sergeant lied , obviously didn’t know you were recording and that you had your evidence to prove that you didn’t tell her to piss off . He’s just as bad ,didn’t want to look at your recording just in case it proved she was lying . The lies just fall out of their mouths, they can’t help it they are so corrupt .
Abhorrent behaviour this used to happen all the time before body worn and mobile phones ....the amount of lies they all sprurted and abuse of powers was everywhere
If telling someone to piss off is an offence then this country is full of criminals - ridiculous use of a Section 4a, it would never have stood up in court. In any case given she was a police officer I'm surprised you didn't cite case law on swearing at police.
I think it was the fact she has lied that was in NNY's mindset. Its quite ironic really as Michael isn't anti police. That said neither pro police or anti police individuals deserve being set up.
If that sergeant was off duty and in her rights as a regular member of the public, then she could be offended by offensive language. However, the moment she identified as a police officer (in the process, claiming the powers of an officer) then surely she's no longer able to claim to offended. Surely that's right?
This is another reason why cops who lie and falsely make statements to you should be made to pay any compensation themselves. Failing to watch the proof of the any said offence should really be a sackable offence. This copper had no proof himself and therefore is only acting in hearsay. A copper cannot take offence to a swear word whether on duty or off duty. No wonder they earn the hate everyday. Take them to the cleaners NNY
My opinion an officer that make a false accusation to a member of public should be fired we are the one that paid them and i mean in this case specifically when he has proof that he didn’t say that that officer should be dismissed without right to appeal
@@Steves_fish cops are not supposed to take offence when sworn at, they are pussies if they do, they can do you for section 5 if there are members of the public about where your swearing is likely to cause alarm harassment and distress but a cop on his/her own would likely be thrown out by the cps as it would not be in the public interest to take you to court. There have been many cases that did get to court with them being thrown out by the judge. Anyway, what do you expect from Surrey police, nearly as bad as the Met police.
@@Steves_fish You can not be arrested for cursing at a cop in the UK, you can however be arrested for cursing at a member of the public or cursing within earshot of the general public. Crap is not a swear word by the way.
Fat cop was flustered...you had him flustered a few times there. You are well composed and have clear thinking and articulation when under pressure. Great stuff...keep it going.
I hope you do carry this through and report her for making a false report. You were detained and threatened with a public order offence, because she lied unnecessarily. Police Officer lying is no surprise though Sgt Wiltshire/Wilpshire is corrupt. Looking forward to an update.
"reasonable grounds" when you offered evidence that you did not commit any offence, which would have allayed any reasonable grounds? Should be a slam dunk case there.
The compo should personally come from the officers wage that way they would start being a bit more professional . He didn't want to see video evidence because all he was fixated about was getting details.
What a lying little tramppy piggy slag, and that knobhead saying show us the video then if that's what u want to do. After the pricks had your name but he never wanted to watch it beforehand. Corrupt mother fuckers. Makes me so pissed off lying cunts.
If it’s just you and her there is no public order offence and if she’s lied she needs sacking from her position of trust. More concerning how many innocent people are behind bars because of her lies?
I always find it annoying when cops say "go ahead and sue", just shows how little it matters regardless of how needed it is. It's like they never learn.
Its because they know that 99% of the time they will get away with it, the system works for them, and if there is compensation to be made, it will come out of the public purse
Its not their money, not their problem. Even if a complaint IS upheld, what happens to them? Nothing, nothing at all it doesn't effect career, earnings or pension.....
They'll only learn when they have to sell their house to pay legal fees. It doesn't affect them in the least. This needs to be changed and they need to be held accountable for their unlawful actions.
The difference between the two copper's are one is an over blown EGO on a ignorance power trip... The other a respectful inquisitive minded human being...
If I saw a police officer on fire I wouldn’t even piss on them to put them out I will just stand there and laugh at them and film the whole thing. Because of how the police have acted in the last two years
Don’t worry I’ll piss on em for you, who else would save you or your family if the crispy police weren’t there when mr burglar comes to smash your nana in
Just the last 2 years? I guess one positive of the covid fiasco is that it opened a few more peoples eyes to what and who the police really are. Violent information gathering agents of the state that should never be trusted.
Unbelievable that he wanted to go down the public order route because another copper had said you swore, when the proof that you hadn't was offered to him. How the hell can he justify being so biased. What a fool.
It was clearly just a lame ploy to get his details. Maybe she never said that in the first place and it was the baldy cop who was lying? He was unaware he was being filmed at the beginning of the interaction.
What P*** me off is nothing done bout it or I have miss it.we been shown what happened and the police behaviour and that's it. Don't know why I bother to look at these.
They have got to learn! And the uniformed officer abusing his powers wouldn't arrest you but apparently getting your details proves if you were using offensive language in public! The female Sergeant needs to be investigated for lying IF the uniformed officer is telling the truth of course.
20:10 My personal opinion doesn't matter I have to leave it at home. But I chose to take my personal opinion on that opinion of a lying sergeant. I then took my opinion to not view any evidence of said complaint because I'm an incompetent big eared 🤡.
It’s amazing how they never want to view the footage that would prove the officers claims to be false, they would much rather blindly throw their powers around.
This is where personal ego's get in the way of good policing. Unfortunately, too many get those inflated egos as soon as they get their military style yellow vests. The same applies to security guards that failed the police temperament test.
Officers can do whatever they want as long as they aren’t held accountable. Getting 1,000 pounds doesn’t solve anything because to it doesn’t come from the officers. When the officers have to pay those they violate, it won’t stop. The system is stupid.
Wow. So he doesn't investigate the alleged offense and does only require a lying officer to threaten someone with arrest. In the US, it also requires an actual member of the public. In the UK a public offense can include a police officer off duty? Who actually lies? Please also file a complaint on him.
Case law says that swearing at cops is not enough to offend them, if no members of the public are in earshot. They have to expect that in their job. If they're offended by words, god help them trying to tackle a real criminal. It astonishes me that they have no shame in admitting to being snowflakes.
The law needs to change so when an officer abuses their powers, and then is told they will be sued, they always reply 'that's fine' because the payment from the law suit comes from the public coffers! There needs to be a petition to change the law so that if an officer abuses their powers they need to be sued personally. This is the only way to put an end to the abuse of powers and put an end to stripping the public from their rights. We all need the police what we do not need is rouge uniform wearers illegally abusing the powers they have been provided with.
I disagree with the statement ,that we all need the police.We all need just laws to be enforced ,but we do not need this can of worms we have at present .Nothing would ever get me to contact the police,under any circumstances whatsoever ,no situation ,however dire ,is made the slightest bit better by the inclusion of unjust corruption in blue uniforms
Public order. I faced a similar situation recently, a security guard (G4S) acused me of threatening his life which is absolutely untrue. I was subsequently arrested and spent a full day in the cells only to be released without charge. The police need better training it's the lack of funding and overworking them that's causing them to act like robocops.
When I were a lad, a long time ago, a Police Officer was someone to contact when you have something to report, when your car's been nicked, or some lowlife has kicked in your door and cleared off with the VHS video recorder (remember those?) Now it seems they're only interested in painting their cars with rainbows, or giving grief to anyone carrying out a perfectly legal activity in a public space, then going fishing. What a country we've become, scared of our own shadows. Stand up for your legal rights and don't submit to their tactics.
he wasn’t even investigating the alleged offense. he threatened to arrest him to obtain his details which he only used to check him out, not at all to aid the investigation. better to go home and sleep in your own bed. complain. sue. demand public apology.💰.
@@inspiresection It's offence, not 'offense', unless you're American. Please use and preserve our proper English language and avoid adopting unnecessary Americanisms. xx
@@pussypostlethwaitsaeronaut8503 - thanks for that. must’ve missed that school day because no matter how many times it’s explained to me now, just can’t grasp the distinction between “ce” & “se”. advice or advise? licence or license? defence or defense?
Thank you, NN Yorkshire. Keeping them accountable for the innocent people like us. Bless you lad. I didn't hear no "Piss Off?"..You tied them up in a Verbal Reef Knot, and sent them packing. Good job.
So, one of two things happened... 1.) She (A Police officer) lied to a sergeant saying you swore at her in order to get you arrested for public order. Or 2.) A Police officer and a Police sergeant cooked up a plan to get you arrested or demand your name with apublic order. *Tut tut tut*
Sue them all, baldy cop wanted Dj's details no matter what was said, female cop just watched baldy abusing his powers and the Sarge fabricated a public order offence and lied and the best bit, much to baldys surprise....its all on camera. Absolutely disgusting behaviour from the police. Hope dj goes through with this till they payout.
Its very important you follow through on this complaint of that sergeant if you definitely can prove she has lied. She may have given statements or evidence in the past, or may do in the future in court or prosecutions, and judges will convict/ prosecute on her word and integrity as a officer. If she is a proven lier then her statements can not be trusted and the justice system will be better for knowing this.
The level of corruption within the Police Force never ceases to amaze me, and even when the PC was presented with evidence to prove NNY’s case, that Sergeant Wiltshire was lying, it was ignored, not once, but multiple times, and they wonder why they are hated.. Fair play to the last PC though, he was open minded during the whole interaction.
It's a criminal offense to say what she did as a police officer and that horrible officer clearly teaches the young female officer how the police lie and force compliance. Both the police officer who lied about the offense AND that piece of garbage with no regard to the law took suspicion to a higher level just to make you comply, This is why we trust police about as far as I can spit Great video much better than the rubbish they put on TV (scripted cop shows where they behave). Keep up the good work
@THE MOST TARGETED CITIZEN yes but she lied to solicit an arrest that's wrong, yes they can lie but not to entrap or give false witness she did but that's police for you citizen or crook they don't care
Criminal offence, not 'offense', unless you're American. Please use and preserve our proper English language and avoid adopting unnecessary Americanisms. xx
In addition to your statement I would also be quite concerned that they have his address now and that's not worth £1000 in anyone's book surely. Harassment springs to mind when the 2 police personnel get their reprimand.
I don’t understand why getting someone’s I’d is so important especially when they’re just gonna let you go afterward. What they gonna do , sign u up to loads of junk mail?
@@deryckevans8877 nah just a normal bloke who calls a stick a stick, the guys channel is designed to antagonise people/police so he can sue. Yeah, fight the power! …. Or whatever I guess.
Its a shame these scumbags don't have to pay compo from their own pockets, if they did perhaps that scumbag would have solved the lie issue by viewing your video when you offered. Everyone contact your local councillios and get that on the agenda.
That's why they do not care and stick together there not hit in there own pockets when he wins the law breakers will not even know this that he won for the behaviour Nothing going to change until these corrupt thugs get charged personally for there wrong doing and at least they might think twice by acting on lies and corruption.
Even if they did their pockets are refilled with taxpayers money, better that they have it deducted from their pension fund that way they loose money and the taxpayer doesn't pay for it ,
@@IBIZABIKE What a great idea, problem being that at current rates of compensation payouts their Pension Fund would already be bankrupt then we wouldn't get any compensation at all.
I'm so Angry just watching this! Well done for keeping your composure during that! Please put a claim in against them both. Keep up great work the drone footage is great! Stay safe 🙏
@@inportugal2 too true 🐖 s don't just lie once every person she's has a hand in arresting and convicting needs to get her participation in their case investigated she's obviously a serial liar and is bound to have commited perjury in some if not all of her cases. Once a liar always a liar and not a very good one at that.
Failing to watch the video is possibly a case of Perverting the course of justice and the Sergeant lying and falsely reporting a crime, should be a clear case of Gross Misconduct and wasting Police time.
For Al the people saying don't give your details you've clearly never been arrested. If the police threaten arrest that's already a violation of his rights. You don't have to get fully arrested
@@vu7419 I dont know what video you just watched but to me the police officer specifically said he legally had to give his details... Quite clearly then if he legally had to give his details and did not then it would lead to his arrest.. I think it was very well played to push the officer as he clearly wanted to be woolly about the whole thing so he could say the details were given voluntarily, but I think even any lay person can see it was not voluntary, he even said I dont want to give me details.. No point in getting arrested, police will just leave you in the cell for hours, no bother to them..
So you offered to show him the objective unbiased video encounter, but he brushed you off, because he had no interest in finding out the actual truth. TYRANT...
Exactly never back down if you are right, simply request a solicitor and keep requesting one when they arrest you and make sure all devices are set to charging mode only and locked with a password so the porkies can't access it.
In DPP v Orum [1989] 1 WLR 88, [1988] 3 All ER 449, [1989] 88 Cr App R 261 the Divisional Court confirmed that police officers are not unable to be victims of section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 caused by swearing and oth
@@nickmacdonald9535 "However, police officers are expected to display a degree of resilience. For an officer to be caused harassment, alarm or distress, the conduct complained of must go beyond that which he or she would regularly come across in the ordinary course of police duties."
@@nickmacdonald9535 I agree with you but imagine arresting someone for something everyone else just has to pretty much deal with when it happens to them.. The ironic thing is that they'll probably swear at you in the process of arresting you 😂
The difference in the interactions between the two cops at 25:00 and the ones at 26:00 really highlights that if the police approach in a friendly manner they get a friendly response and if they approach in a hostile manner they will get a hostile response. It's all down to them to do their job properly. And it can never be said that auditors instigate anything when you can get such a difference in response.
This engagements with dimwits like these are brilliant! It really encourages people NOT to be fearful when stopped and to call them out. Excellent real life role-play.
Sue these unlawful muppets, I’m extremely disgusted by their lack of respect of a member of the public, lies caught on camera. Wow just wow. Big up your future win as these two are going to be on a training Police video. Outstanding audit and thank you for the visuals. Lovely rozzers ✊ in the little paddy, as morons overtook waving for no apparent reason.
The P.C is claiming the Sergeant made the statement to him . How do we not know that its the P.C just making this nonsense up in order to solicit your details. If however the Sergeant did lie, then this is a very serious matter that needs action. Decent video, but a very very slow start…editing may have helped. Respect 👍👍
At 15:08 the police officer is referring to the exchange at 12:27; however News Now Yorkshire never told her to p*** off from what I can see
@Dobin Pantomine Horse No chance of that the meta data would show that
Fk me with a swordfish!!! 15:37 Jesus Christ, that went from, fresh sweet water, to a pint of vinegar, in bugger all flat. He's a spicy meatball.
@Dobin Pantomine Horse there's no editing there, and even if he did not a crime to swear at police to give them the power to start a section 5 or 4a as he used. Easy £1000
No prizes for guessing which end of the panto horse *dobin is.
Ps, it's DOBBIN bright boy, don't you cops know that?
@Dobin Pantomine Horse It was hardly careful.
So, he investigates her claim without evidence, yet ignores your claim and evidence. That's corruption exemplified.
That lying female cop should be fired immediately and the auditor can prove it. The cop should be fired also because he could have watched the video and dispelled hid suspicion! He would not watch the video before he got his details!
It gets worse than that...they can do whatever they want without a camera on them
This is an excellent example of why there are no 'Good Apples'. The Police will always support their colleagues irrespective of the situation. They lie like cheap bedside rugs and they are all 'Rotten Apples'
So the tyrant refuses to watch evidence of the incident so that he can illegally detain you. Clear case for a civil claim.
Why would he, it was the very basis of his unlawful conduct. They dont do evidence as they can get away with simple suspicion.
How many times has she lied before ????? How many people have been found guilty because she lies???? Clearly she can’t be trusted in this type of job
How can she ever give evidence against anyone again. She cannot expect a judge or a jury to accept anything she says as a known liar. If she stitched anyone up then they should take this video as evidence and get their case re-opened!
Even if you had said piss off it wouldn't be a criminal offence if it wasn't near any of the public likely to cause distress and alarm. The lying sargent should be sacked or at least demoted.
His behaviour along with his Sgt’s is shocking. Both lying to pervert the course of justice. I hope you receive a good settlement.
a serving police officer cannot be a complainant under section 5
That’s why he used 4a, harassment alarm or distress, which can be applied to a serving officer
That's not true just that the bar is higher. But being told to 'piss off' would hardly reach the standard of something in excess of what they are used to.
@@johnnyrichardson902 Swearing at police is no longer a crime because officers hear foul-mouthed abuse too often to be offended, a High Court judge has ruled.
The landmark judgement came as Mr Justice Bean overturned a public order conviction of a young suspect who repeatedly used the F-word while being searched for drugs
@@koshvorlon8132 thanks for the info, every day is a school day!
@@johnnyrichardson902 Strange that some of us know the law better than the people who are meant to enforce them.
It's crazy...the constant BS (and lies) you see from cops, their bosses and also the 'justice system' - and I'm referring to what I've witnessed here in Canada. Same BS in Britain it seems. Thanks for sharing! Watching from North Vancouver, Canada. Regards, Jules.
Canadian cops are the f*cking worst. They support the scum of the earth in their ranks.
States aren't any different 👍
They don't even care that they're seen to be corrupt. The cop admitted he had no interest in seeing the evidence that the sergeant lied. He believed her 100% and totally ignored the argument of the auditor. That's discrimination. The fact that a sergeant lied in order to get a law abiding member of the public in trouble should be treated as a serious misdemeanour. I'm also concerned that a police officer thinks (quote) 'it's fine' that £1000 of public tax money is being wasted because of a lying sergeant and his incompetence to investigate properly. The body language of the female officer said it all. She was embarrassed, ashamed and guilty.
The reason he wasn't interested because any fines that are given out are payed for by the taxpayer, no cops do any forking out.
Yes...cop was more willing to arrest than look at cast iron evidence that was offered to him.
Actually, I've thought about this. She deliberately lied to get a colleague to go out and move you on or arrest you; he took her word and refused to investigate the allegation despite you saying you had proof she was lying. This amounts to conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and is a serious charge that carries a penalty of imprisonment. Base your complaint and civil suit on that and they should offer a settlement of at least £5000. You could even demand the CPS prosecute the both and take out a private prosecution if they refuse.
Women cops are that bad word....you know the one. Send a pussified male cop to defend her bruised ego. What a snowflake!!
She would just lie and say she must of misheard him
Flying drones entirely within the law and winding coppers up who obviously don't know the law is my new favourite auditors activity.
The contrast between these 4 interactions is really surprising. The last two officers were good examples of proper coppers
Wow, just wow. Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice by the police is a very serious offence and a career buster. He made several clear statements about what he was told by the female officer. She’s in massive bother
I hope she is in massive bother. The only problem is that WYP Professional Standards are employed to protect bent officers like her. I say bent because she has perverted the course of justice and used her position to breach NNY's human and legal rights. I hope this news event runs and runs. Yes she was annoyed he was legally flying a drone but to lie to two officers and get them complicit in her deception was out of order. She now becomes questionable as to other occasions when she has deliberately lied to get someone's details or get them arrested. She would do well to resign now.
@@dogbite5509 And WHY has she gone back to the station when off duty?
@@warriorprincess3360 Thats of no relevance at all
@@realfacthunt I disagree. She could be covering up other lies she has told previous to this incident.
@@dogbite5509 100% How can you trust a cop who lies (oops)
Utterly disgusting, how many more lies on people has that plain clothed Sargent told. And clearly there are more than enough police who would blindly follow a lying cop's words even when recorded video evidence was offered for viewing several times, but the male officer new that to view the evidence would prove exactly how the female Sargent lied. No good cops.
Great video, hope you complain and get some justice.
That police officer is telling lies, it doesn't matter how many offences anyone has committed, we all have a common law right to remain silent, and the police tell you that if they ever arrest you.
But once arrested they can get your details, or you have committed an offence but they in this case had nothing like enough to charge him
@@robba1234 - So how can they get your details unless you tell them?
@@GH-lo8vl If you are arrested you are obliged to give details, however the cop knew that that's why he said you might. you could etc. and it's easy to stand on principles but a night in jail is a night in jail, and that happens, released next day no charges, its a corrupt system but its how they like it
@@robba1234 - The key word being "Obliged",
It's not that it's a corrupt system, it's just that people do not know what "Governed by consent" actually means -
COMMON LAW (Law of the land) - upheld by a police constable.
No one is above common law, and those in breach of common law will be tried in a common law court before a jury of their peers.
There must be a victim in common law and they do not need your name, as the victim and/or witnesses will point you out as being the perpetrator.
Common law -
1 - You cannot hurt anyone
2 - You cannot steal anyone's property
3 - You cannot damage anyone's property
4 - You cannot defraud anyone
5 - You cannot commit breach of the peace towards anyone
6 - You cannot commit treason (or sedition), towards the crown.
And that's common law ☝️, that's it and NOTHING ELSE.
ACTS AND STATUTES OF PARLIAMENT (Commercial law, contract law, law of the sea, admiralty law) - upheld by a police officer (office, paperwork).
Only applies to certain groups (Road Traffic Act applies to drivers of vehicles etc) and needs your consent to enforce it, of which they will try to get using legalease ("Do you understand" - meaning do you 'under stand' ((stand under)) my authority).
They need your name to issue fines and court dates,
(as "Mr Hate crime" can't point you out in court - and no court usher ever shouts out "Occupier to court one"),
You are the only one who can give or confirm your name, so NEVER give it.
Your answer to every question should be -
"I retain my common law right to remain silent"
Your answer to every request should be -
"Under protest and duress" (They always "ask you" to do something rather than 'tell you' because then you've accepting their authority).
Q - "What's your name?"
A - "I retain my common law right to remain silent"
Q - "What's your address?"
A - "I retain my common law right to remain silent"
Q - "If you don't tell me you'll be arrested"
A - "I retain my common law right to remain silent"
Q - "Well I'm arresting you blah blah blah, 'do you understand'?"
A - "No I do not stand under your authority"
Q - "Ok well do you want to come this way"
A - "Under protest and duress"
And before anyone points out that they can get your name from a driving license or passport etc, those are fraudulent documents created from a birth certificate that clearly states across the bottom -
"A certificate is not evidence of identity".
Let's not forget that the first thing a police constable says to you when he/she arrests you is -
"You do not have to say anything",
Because, believe it or not -
YOU DON'T.
You do NOT have to speak to a police constable.
You do NOT have to speak to the desk sergeant at the police station.
You do NOT have to have a police interview.
You do NOT have to attend court.
Exercise your God given inalienable common law rights, they're yours and cannot be taken away by anyone, especially by some police officer using his/her uniform to commit treason and fraud by acting as a government bailiff.
Police constables swear an oath before God to serve the Monach and protect people and property. They DO NOT swear an oath to protect the government.
They swear their oath raising their right hand, and if they went against an oath which they swear to in a court, they would receive two years for perjury.
@@robba1234 remain silent? or like I have done in the past tell the Custody sgt to f@ck right off I am not answering any of your fkin questions and not playing your little game. get the duty solicitor while I get my ed down in the cell, Oh and duty MO while your at it if your not too busy doing paperwork. I still have never been charged with anything, bunch of lying cnuts.
“Prefer behhhhhcan” 😂😂😂
He refused to look at evidence, mind blowing
He believed one party 100% and completely ignored the other party's version of events. It's called police corruption.
@@asensibleyoungman2978, he didn't believe the cop over the auditor. He simply wanted the details.
Is it really a crime to say "P' OFF" to a copper in the UK???
@@interestedparty00 So why did he side with the sergeant and why wasn't he interested in looking at proof on the auditor's camera?
The police don't lie 🤣
Gained a new subscriber! I'm in the USA and I love the way you approached this. All my love and prayers for you and yours. 💙
Wow you have offered evidence and he's going on like a tyrant I would take them all the way
See this is why I have lost all respect for the police, that Sergeant lied , obviously didn’t know you were recording and that you had your evidence to prove that you didn’t tell her to piss off . He’s just as bad ,didn’t want to look at your recording just in case it proved she was lying . The lies just fall out of their mouths, they can’t help it they are so corrupt .
Abhorrent behaviour this used to happen all the time before body worn and mobile phones ....the amount of lies they all sprurted and abuse of powers was everywhere
The threat to arrest is an assault if the reason for the arrest is unlawful.
Loving the work on your own...
Much much better bro! Keep up the work!
If telling someone to piss off is an offence then this country is full of criminals - ridiculous use of a Section 4a, it would never have stood up in court. In any case given she was a police officer I'm surprised you didn't cite case law on swearing at police.
I think it was the fact she has lied that was in NNY's mindset. Its quite ironic really as Michael isn't anti police. That said neither pro police or anti police individuals deserve being set up.
@@dogbite5509 police Sargent is just a lier
@@kayetaylor5551 what do you mean he was completely upright the whole time?
Piss off is not a public order offence.
Judge Bean 2011......ruled on this. And as no one else was in earshot it's not public order offence.
If that sergeant was off duty and in her rights as a regular member of the public, then she could be offended by offensive language. However, the moment she identified as a police officer (in the process, claiming the powers of an officer) then surely she's no longer able to claim to offended. Surely that's right?
This is another reason why cops who lie and falsely make statements to you should be made to pay any compensation themselves. Failing to watch the proof of the any said offence should really be a sackable offence. This copper had no proof himself and therefore is only acting in hearsay. A copper cannot take offence to a swear word whether on duty or off duty. No wonder they earn the hate everyday. Take them to the cleaners NNY
3 dead pigs I'd love to see
My opinion an officer that make a false accusation to a member of public should be fired we are the one that paid them and i mean in this case specifically when he has proof that he didn’t say that that officer should be dismissed without right to appeal
@@marcsduk plus the fact that swearing at a cop is not an offence
@@Steves_fish cops are not supposed to take offence when sworn at, they are pussies if they do, they can do you for section 5 if there are members of the public about where your swearing is likely to cause alarm harassment and distress but a cop on his/her own would likely be thrown out by the cps as it would not be in the public interest to take you to court. There have been many cases that did get to court with them being thrown out by the judge. Anyway, what do you expect from Surrey police, nearly as bad as the Met police.
@@Steves_fish You can not be arrested for cursing at a cop in the UK, you can however be arrested for cursing at a member of the public or cursing within earshot of the general public. Crap is not a swear word by the way.
Fat cop was flustered...you had him flustered a few times there. You are well composed and have clear thinking and articulation when under pressure. Great stuff...keep it going.
That's because he has a better brain than the bully cop.
I hope you do carry this through and report her for making a false report. You were detained and threatened with a public order offence, because she lied unnecessarily. Police Officer lying is no surprise though Sgt Wiltshire/Wilpshire is corrupt. Looking forward to an update.
When you said you have been over there and your going to go over again made me lol
"reasonable grounds" when you offered evidence that you did not commit any offence, which would have allayed any reasonable grounds? Should be a slam dunk case there.
The compo should personally come from the officers wage that way they would start being a bit more professional . He didn't want to see video evidence because all he was fixated about was getting details.
The entirety of his investigation = getting your details. Yup, your solicitors will love this one.
which as he pointed out they could easily have got his ID legitimately through the drone .
What a lying little tramppy piggy slag, and that knobhead saying show us the video then if that's what u want to do. After the pricks had your name but he never wanted to watch it beforehand. Corrupt mother fuckers. Makes me so pissed off lying cunts.
"You've already been drawn into it mate" hahahaha love it
All these liars defend each other. That’s why it’s so important to film and expose their underhand abuse of the law and their corrupt tactics.
It’s strange how he didn’t have time to radio through for her details, yet he had time to follow through with a false allegation ….what a disgrace..
And that is a clear example of corrupt Police Officers 🤬
If it’s just you and her there is no public order offence and if she’s lied she needs sacking from her position of trust. More concerning how many innocent people are behind bars because of her lies?
I always find it annoying when cops say "go ahead and sue", just shows how little it matters regardless of how needed it is. It's like they never learn.
Its because they know that 99% of the time they will get away with it, the system works for them, and if there is compensation to be made, it will come out of the public purse
@@fordcapri6288 which is why it's such an issue. The systematic problems need to change globally when it comes to policing.
Its not their money, not their problem.
Even if a complaint IS upheld, what happens to them?
Nothing, nothing at all it doesn't effect career, earnings or pension.....
They'll only learn when they have to sell their house to pay legal fees. It doesn't affect them in the least. This needs to be changed and they need to be held accountable for their unlawful actions.
Because you don't understand what "sue" means.
The difference between the two copper's are one is an over blown EGO on a ignorance power trip...
The other a respectful inquisitive minded human being...
If I saw a police officer on fire I wouldn’t even piss on them to put them out I will just stand there and laugh at them and film the whole thing. Because of how the police have acted in the last two years
Ditto
I'm somewhat ashamed to say I feel the same way..
Don’t worry I’ll piss on em for you, who else would save you or your family if the crispy police weren’t there when mr burglar comes to smash your nana in
Just the last 2 years?
I guess one positive of the covid fiasco is that it opened a few more peoples eyes to what and who the police really are. Violent information gathering agents of the state that should never be trusted.
Ditto
I prefer Bacon. 😂😂😂😂
He mugged you right off!!
Well done Officers!
Oh man. He lied to you to get your details. Disgusting!
Why do they want details so badly?
when the officer gets back in car ( I PREFER BACON ). 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Pork sausage, bacon it's still a pig.
Unbelievable that he wanted to go down the public order route because another copper had said you swore, when the proof that you hadn't was offered to him. How the hell can he justify being so biased. What a fool.
BTB and all genes
It was clearly just a lame ploy to get his details. Maybe she never said that in the first place and it was the baldy cop who was lying? He was unaware he was being filmed at the beginning of the interaction.
Not such a fool he got them. So who's the fool ?
@@judithmatthews8460He was a huge fool. In the wrong job obviously.
@@judithmatthews8460 Your gang members for telling malicious lies.
"you've all ready been drawn into it mate" lmfao 🤣
The officer at the end trying to use logic and being friendly….. he will never make it in the force.
What P*** me off is nothing done bout it or I have miss it.we been shown what happened and the police behaviour and that's it. Don't know why I bother to look at these.
Resolutions take about a year which is maybe why you see it that way but trust me they don't get away with it
They have got to learn! And the uniformed officer abusing his powers wouldn't arrest you but apparently getting your details proves if you were using offensive language in public! The female Sergeant needs to be investigated for lying IF the uniformed officer is telling the truth of course.
20:10 My personal opinion doesn't matter I have to leave it at home.
But I chose to take my personal opinion on that opinion of a lying sergeant.
I then took my opinion to not view any evidence of said complaint because I'm an incompetent big eared 🤡.
It’s amazing how they never want to view the footage that would prove the officers claims to be false, they would much rather blindly throw their powers around.
Was happy to look at it afterwards though but wasn't interested beforehand.
@@WinstonSmith685 All just to get the Police version of Crack.... which is your details.
Being verbally abusive to a police sergeant without any member of the public present does not fulfill the criteria for any offence at all.
This is where personal ego's get in the way of good policing. Unfortunately, too many get those inflated egos as soon as they get their military style yellow vests. The same applies to security guards that failed the police temperament test.
Them 3 car were in a hurry, is Marti out auditing tonight? 🤣
Officers can do whatever they want as long as they aren’t held accountable. Getting 1,000 pounds doesn’t solve anything because to it doesn’t come from the officers. When the officers have to pay those they violate, it won’t stop. The system is stupid.
BTB thats good payment
When will they learn? Hopefully never because it's comedy gold.
Wow. So he doesn't investigate the alleged offense and does only require a lying officer to threaten someone with arrest.
In the US, it also requires an actual member of the public. In the UK a public offense can include a police officer off duty? Who actually lies?
Please also file a complaint on him.
Offence, not 'offense', unless you're American. Please use and preserve our proper English language and avoid adopting unnecessary Americanisms. xx
@@pussypostlethwaitsaeronaut8503 Er! - I think you'll find that CJ Mol is actually an American living in the US 🤣
@@pussypostlethwaitsaeronaut8503 grammar nazi in for duty, piss off.
Case law says that swearing at cops is not enough to offend them, if no members of the public are in earshot. They have to expect that in their job. If they're offended by words, god help them trying to tackle a real criminal.
It astonishes me that they have no shame in admitting to being snowflakes.
Should have his taser privilege removed.
public order , what a load of balls, if she is off duty, she has no power
The law needs to change so when an officer abuses their powers, and then is told they will be sued, they always reply 'that's fine' because the payment from the law suit comes from the public coffers! There needs to be a petition to change the law so that if an officer abuses their powers they need to be sued personally. This is the only way to put an end to the abuse of powers and put an end to stripping the public from their rights. We all need the police what we do not need is rouge uniform wearers illegally abusing the powers they have been provided with.
I disagree with the statement ,that we all need the police.We all need just laws to be enforced ,but we do not need this can of worms we have at present .Nothing would ever get me to contact the police,under any circumstances whatsoever ,no situation ,however dire ,is made the slightest bit better by the inclusion of unjust corruption in blue uniforms
@@davidwilliams5124 I bet everyone wishes they was as hard as you welcoming chaos, good on ya!
Public order. I faced a similar situation recently, a security guard (G4S) acused me of threatening his life which is absolutely untrue. I was subsequently arrested and spent a full day in the cells only to be released without charge. The police need better training it's the lack of funding and overworking them that's causing them to act like robocops.
When I were a lad, a long time ago, a Police Officer was someone to contact when you have something to report, when your car's been nicked, or some lowlife has kicked in your door and cleared off with the VHS video recorder (remember those?) Now it seems they're only interested in painting their cars with rainbows, or giving grief to anyone carrying out a perfectly legal activity in a public space, then going fishing. What a country we've become, scared of our own shadows. Stand up for your legal rights and don't submit to their tactics.
I'm still using old tech, 2 video recorders, 2 dvd players, vinyl records, audio cassettes.
Why bin it all? It still works. 😊
Cherry picked crimes, nothing too strenuous, things attaching a fine, and lazy blame the victim outcomes.
Real good and interesting video mate, follow this case up and make sure you sue the lying tyrants, disgusting way to go on!!!
Can’t believe you gave details, you are usually much stronger than that.
I think it probably works in his favour in the legal claim.
he wasn’t even investigating the alleged offense. he threatened to arrest him to obtain his details which he only used to check him out, not at all to aid the investigation. better to go home and sleep in your own bed. complain. sue. demand public apology.💰.
@@inspiresection It's offence, not 'offense', unless you're American. Please use and preserve our proper English language and avoid adopting unnecessary Americanisms. xx
@@pussypostlethwaitsaeronaut8503 - thanks for that. must’ve missed that school day because no matter how many times it’s explained to me now, just can’t grasp the distinction between “ce” & “se”. advice or advise? licence or license? defence or defense?
Thank you, NN Yorkshire.
Keeping them accountable for the innocent people like us. Bless you lad. I didn't hear no "Piss Off?"..You tied them up in a Verbal Reef Knot, and sent them packing.
Good job.
So, one of two things happened...
1.) She (A Police officer) lied to a sergeant saying you swore at her in order to get you arrested for public order.
Or
2.) A Police officer and a Police sergeant cooked up a plan to get you arrested or demand your name with apublic order.
*Tut tut tut*
Sue them all, baldy cop wanted Dj's details no matter what was said, female cop just watched baldy abusing his powers and the Sarge fabricated a public order offence and lied and the best bit, much to baldys surprise....its all on camera. Absolutely disgusting behaviour from the police. Hope dj goes through with this till they payout.
Needs a section 26 charge against 1 or both.
22:22 that officer should not be allowed to walk around in public anywhere in the UK - he needs to be imprisoned
Its very important you follow through on this complaint of that sergeant if you definitely can prove she has lied.
She may have given statements or evidence in the past, or may do in the future in court or prosecutions, and judges will convict/ prosecute on her word and integrity as a officer. If she is a proven lier then her statements can not be trusted and the justice system will be better for knowing this.
If you can't stand your ground this bullying tyranny will never stop. Stand your ground or take up knitting.
Wow I can’t believe that she’s a police sergeant and she blatantly lied I dread to think what else she lies about well done News now Yorkshire
The level of corruption within the Police Force never ceases to amaze me, and even when the PC was presented with evidence to prove NNY’s case, that Sergeant Wiltshire was lying, it was ignored, not once, but multiple times, and they wonder why they are hated..
Fair play to the last PC though, he was open minded during the whole interaction.
It's a criminal offense to say what she did as a police officer and that horrible officer clearly teaches the young female officer how the police lie and force compliance. Both the police officer who lied about the offense AND that piece of garbage with no regard to the law took suspicion to a higher level just to make you comply, This is why we trust police about as far as I can spit Great video much better than the rubbish they put on TV (scripted cop shows where they behave). Keep up the good work
@THE MOST TARGETED CITIZEN yes but she lied to solicit an arrest that's wrong, yes they can lie but not to entrap or give false witness she did but that's police for you citizen or crook they don't care
Criminal offence, not 'offense', unless you're American. Please use and preserve our proper English language and avoid adopting unnecessary Americanisms. xx
In addition to your statement I would also be quite concerned that they have his address now and that's not worth £1000 in anyone's book surely. Harassment springs to mind when the 2 police personnel get their reprimand.
Wouldn't trust them that far...
@@warriorprincess3360 thousand pounds is better than leaving it...
I don’t understand why getting someone’s I’d is so important especially when they’re just gonna let you go afterward. What they gonna do , sign u up to loads of junk mail?
Shocking how comfortable they are telling people to make a complaint, seems a bit suspicious.
Because morons shout ‘solicitor’ and ‘I’m gunna sue you’ for breathing wrong in their direction. You get used to it and it gets boring.
@@jaeslow6347
I assume you're sitting at a desk in a police station getting well paid for doing next to nowt.
@@deryckevans8877 nah just a normal bloke who calls a stick a stick, the guys channel is designed to antagonise people/police so he can sue. Yeah, fight the power! …. Or whatever I guess.
@@deryckevans8877seems like they get free electricity as well 🤪🤪🤪
The sad thing is they both knew she was lying, they were lying from the very beginning. The state of the police force is pitiful.
Swearing at a police officer (if no other member of the public could have reasonably heard you) is NOT an offence
“I prefer bacon” 😂
Its a shame these scumbags don't have to pay compo from their own pockets, if they did perhaps that scumbag would have solved the lie issue by viewing your video when you offered. Everyone contact your local councillios and get that on the agenda.
They'll pay in their family blood
That's why they do not care and stick together there not hit in there own pockets when he wins the law breakers will not even know this that he won for the behaviour
Nothing going to change until these corrupt thugs get charged personally for there wrong doing and at least they might think twice by acting on lies and corruption.
Even if they did their pockets are refilled with taxpayers money, better that they have it deducted from their pension fund that way they loose money and the taxpayer doesn't pay for it ,
@@IBIZABIKE What a great idea, problem being that at current rates of compensation payouts their Pension Fund would already be bankrupt then we wouldn't get any compensation at all.
Another child, fresh from school, getting her six weeks training on how to deal with someone he thought was a pushover.
I’m investigating an alleged offence.
Would you like to see video of the events?
No.
I love the fact that if it’s too late or too early in the day it shuts their bloody annoying ass sirens up
I'm so Angry just watching this! Well done for keeping your composure during that! Please put a claim in against them both. Keep up great work the drone footage is great! Stay safe 🙏
your conversation skills are amazing
So, he could look at evidence but prefers you to make a complaint.
Is better in this way, because now all the cases were she interfered need to be reviewed
@@inportugal2 too true 🐖 s don't just lie once every person she's has a hand in arresting and convicting needs to get her participation in their case investigated she's obviously a serial liar and is bound to have commited perjury in some if not all of her cases. Once a liar always a liar and not a very good one at that.
Shared of his sergeant
I believe everything everyone is saying regarding the lying police officer. But wait a minute, which officer do you think was lying..?
@@andrehulse11 well if the Sargent don't says that, two officers tell the auditor she said .the problem now is with the Sargent one or two are fuck
Failing to watch the video is possibly a case of Perverting the course of justice and the Sergeant lying and falsely reporting a crime, should be a clear case of Gross Misconduct and wasting Police time.
For Al the people saying don't give your details you've clearly never been arrested. If the police threaten arrest that's already a violation of his rights. You don't have to get fully arrested
But he didn't actually say he was going to arrest. He said it could be grounds for an arrest.
@@vu7419 I dont know what video you just watched but to me the police officer specifically said he legally had to give his details... Quite clearly then if he legally had to give his details and did not then it would lead to his arrest.. I think it was very well played to push the officer as he clearly wanted to be woolly about the whole thing so he could say the details were given voluntarily, but I think even any lay person can see it was not voluntary, he even said I dont want to give me details.. No point in getting arrested, police will just leave you in the cell for hours, no bother to them..
Criminal Attempts Act 1981 - shocking attempt to incriminate and pervert the law - great vid!
So you offered to show him the objective unbiased video encounter, but he brushed you off, because he had no interest in finding out the actual truth. TYRANT...
Tyrant Cop.
If she lies about that - can you imagine her in court - solicitors should be reviewing all her arrests and appealing them
Let them arrest you, false arrest, show video afterwards
And make sure that action is taken against that lying sergeant.
The police themselves are nothing but scumbags.
Exactly never back down if you are right, simply request a solicitor and keep requesting one when they arrest you and make sure all devices are set to charging mode only and locked with a password so the porkies can't access it.
We should no by now auditors are pussy and will never take an arrest
Why is it always fine, to leave your self wide open to a law suite?
Why isn't he interested in establishing the truth? Unbelievable. Cheers 👍
Are we ignoring the fact that a serving police officer cannot be the complainant in a section 5? Especially considering the offense is fictional..
In DPP v Orum [1989] 1 WLR 88, [1988] 3 All ER 449, [1989] 88 Cr App R 261 the Divisional Court confirmed that police officers are not unable to be victims of section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 caused by swearing and oth
@@nickmacdonald9535 "However, police officers are expected to display a degree of resilience. For an officer to be caused harassment, alarm or distress, the conduct complained of must go beyond that which he or she would regularly come across in the ordinary course of police duties."
@@jamesclough7656 . But that is too subjective to have any real meaning. You take your chances when having a slanging match with a copper
@@nickmacdonald9535 I agree with you but imagine arresting someone for something everyone else just has to pretty much deal with when it happens to them..
The ironic thing is that they'll probably swear at you in the process of arresting you 😂
The difference in the interactions between the two cops at 25:00 and the ones at 26:00 really highlights that if the police approach in a friendly manner they get a friendly response and if they approach in a hostile manner they will get a hostile response. It's all down to them to do their job properly. And it can never be said that auditors instigate anything when you can get such a difference in response.
This engagements with dimwits like these are brilliant! It really encourages people NOT to be fearful when stopped and to call them out. Excellent real life role-play.
Sue these unlawful muppets, I’m extremely disgusted by their lack of respect of a member of the public, lies caught on camera.
Wow just wow.
Big up your future win as these two are going to be on a training Police video.
Outstanding audit and thank you for the visuals.
Lovely rozzers ✊ in the little paddy, as morons overtook waving for no apparent reason.
The P.C is claiming the Sergeant made the statement to him . How do we not know that its the P.C just making this nonsense up in order to solicit your details. If however the Sergeant did lie, then this is a very serious matter that needs action. Decent video, but a very very slow start…editing may have helped. Respect 👍👍
Why is it more serious if he lied than she did? I say it’s six of one half dozen of the other no?
Lets wind the police up and get drone rules changed and spoil it for proper drone users ! This is just baiting
Could you not file a report that she’s filed a false police report which is a criminal offence?
Yes, the charge would be perverting the course of justice which is enough to have her dismissed
It’s also a section 26 offence
Sergeant is a total disgrace! Lying to get someone in trouble! And then baldy backing up the lier!
"I might arrest you for the heinous crime of uttering the words *PISS OFF*"
WOW. What has happened to Law and Order in good old Blighty :(
NNY: See ya later sausages!
Male Sausage cop: I prefer bacon 😂
Tyrant's lying what's new
Why does this bully have to do all this,go through all this when he can easily sort it out there and then.What an absolute Tyrant.