Building The "Ultimate" Router - [PFSense + Pi-hole + PIVPN]

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 488

  • @DIYDaveOK
    @DIYDaveOK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +587

    I've been running a virtualized router using an old system called Smoothwall for seven years problem-free. I recently upgraded the whole thing to ProxMox, pfSense, and piHole and it has been fabulous. I've got in-house 2.5Gb over WiFi6 and a 12TB NAS. Even did a video on the server rebuild and install, just have to edit it all down - you and a few other channels were a great inspiration!!

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Nice! I’ll try to check it out
      Edit: just realized you said you were editing haha. Let me know when it’s up

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Also, what’s up my fellow Oklahoman haha!

    • @DIYDaveOK
      @DIYDaveOK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      ​@@HardwareHaven Really!? That's awesome! In OKC! I swear you were doing your build just as I was doing mine - saw the dates on one of your files was Dec 31. And I went through the same issue on installing the RealTek driver into ProxMox but only after I did the build but before I'd done any real perf testing. The parallels are kinda spooky LOL!!! Hope to get the video edited this week, but it won't be as polished as yours ! And I didn't even think about running piHole as a container. I may redeploy it. 😁

    • @somebody3271
      @somebody3271 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@HardwareHaven good video 👍

    • @keithheaton
      @keithheaton 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @DIY Dave I have not heard of smooth Wall and years back in the early 2000's on a dial-up modem for my network and they have not updated that piece of software and God only knows what software security issues it poses

  • @ChrisMenge
    @ChrisMenge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I really appreciate your honesty during commentary. Great vid!

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks man!

    • @crownasaurus7412
      @crownasaurus7412 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He lied to us about Hello Fresh being good though :-(

  • @TheCreat
    @TheCreat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    When I was setting up my home lab/servers, I initially virtualized my router (also on Proxmox, on a "normal" x86 platform). Since I was still tinkering a fair amount with the whole (new) system, that meant that every time I did something physical, the internet went down as well. Having VLans and local routing as well means that even things that were still all on weren't reachable either. So I ended up swapping to a dedicated virtualized physical router similar to the one used in this build (Intel N5095 based, running network services only on a proxmox host dedicated to network), but quickly realized it was far more capable than what I needed. So I eventually swapped to a bare-metal, non-virtualized Zima Board (still x86, but more rapi-sized) for my router doing anything network related just via plugins. I'm now very happy with this very low power solution, and I can tinker with the main "lab" all I want without any service interruptions to stuff that isn't rebooted or shutdown.
    Note that pfSense and OPNsense can do WireGuard and piHole-like DNS services natively (via Unbound or many other options), and virtualization or containerization isn't really needed.

    • @fatlip8315
      @fatlip8315 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I learned how to burn food. It's not an easy task - with that sole lesson. I learned how to cook, including adjusting the burners and figuring out how to work with different ovens and different ranges, all on how it heats up. Is it fast, slow, when does it start to boil, where does it start to simmer, after it boils, how long until it lowers down to a simmer. Voila. I hope you all have a lesson that can help you learn to cook.
      Thanks for the video tutorial and infoset in pfSense. I like the PIs for a wide variety of ideas. But, I'm using HP z-Series on legacy Bios, to disable the backdoors. Also learned theirs bios passwords, to the bios backdoors. Might be wrong. Idk much.

    • @breakingthemasks
      @breakingthemasks 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you ever make that video?... It sounds like what you did is exactly what in want to do.

  • @davidg5898
    @davidg5898 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    12:29 You being lame is actually really smart. I did the same when I switched from a "real" router to a pfsense box.
    I put the pfsense box behind the router and migrated things behind the pfsense box over time. Once everything was behind the pfsense box, it just needed a few WAN setting changes and then I pulled the "real" router from the front of the chain, switched the router to AP mode and put it behind the pfsense box for WiFi connectivity. Since I got my bearings and learned the pfsense settings while just a couple machines were behind the pfsense box, there was no real downtime ever involved.

  • @HardwareHaven
    @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    FAQ BELOW!!!
    For 21 FREE meals with HelloFresh plus free shipping, use code HARDWAREHAVEN21 at bit.ly/3WdgdSU!
    FAQ and Concerns:
    - Why didn’t I use OPNSense?
    I just don’t have much experience with it, but I will try it out later, maybe even before I set this up in my home!
    - PFSense can do basically all of those things with other packages; why not do that?
    Honestly, I wasn’t aware of all the packages available, especially the experimental ones. But I also like the flexibility of containers and VMs. I can easily swap to OPNSense later without having to set everything else up again if I want for example. Also, software preference is a thing. It doesn’t mean I think running everything bare metal is a bad idea. Quite the opposite!

  • @anthonypolsinelli1179
    @anthonypolsinelli1179 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Cool idea, but pfsense has all of this without the need for other VMs.
    Pi-hole - pfblocker package
    PiVPN - openvpn or wireguard experimental packages
    Reverse proxy - ha proxy package
    Ddns - native Ddns function

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      For sure, and I honestly didn’t know all of those were available. But I think there’s merit in the flexibility that VMs and containers offer. Appreciate the comment!

    • @zeendaniels5809
      @zeendaniels5809 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Experimental packages on your home router? No thanks.
      And the pfblocker package is... Let's say too basic compared to piHole. It doesn't do any logging, nor statistics, nor tables and graphs. Sure, if you don't need all that go ahead, but for most people I think piHole is the way to go.

    • @elgavilan2000
      @elgavilan2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zeendaniels5809 I've been using the Wireguard package for a while now and it's been rock solid for me. Or if you prefer the OpenVPN package is not experimental. Agree 100% about Pihole vs. pfBlockerNG, although I still use pfBlockerNG for IP blocking.

  • @tylernewton1620
    @tylernewton1620 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello, I am a network administrator and we use pfsense for some customers as a VM on VMware, and it is super stable and reliable. Honestly, it is more reliable than some of our SonicWall appliances. One customer has high uptime requirements, and the primary wan firewall has been up for about a year and no issues. (I know it needs a reboot. Again, high up time customer. Very specific case lol) but I highly recommend turning an old PC into a router if you want a fun project or your router shows inconsistencies or issues. You just need two ethernet ports, and add-in cards can be cheap. I do recommend Intel NICs if you are doing bare metal port forwarding. Non Intel cards can have issues on pfsense

  • @valdimer11
    @valdimer11 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When setting up containers, i find it is good practice to always set up individual software on one container. Its easy for maintenance but its also easier to manage in general because you are not forgetting which container is what.

  • @jonathanmarshall3974
    @jonathanmarshall3974 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've been running a Netgear Cable Modem / Router combo since 2015. It's performed okay but I think this video finally gave me the inspiration to go PFSense.

  • @Yuriel1981
    @Yuriel1981 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    I'd love to see a video on your full homelab. Setup, machines (truenas server, pf sense router, your and your wife's pcs) a full tour would be awesome! (Time to clean up that cable management lol). Also I just realized you composed your own theme. Very nicely done. Love it. Hope to see your music set up as well

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I have a mini tour over on the patreon although it's a bit outdated. I keep telling myself I'm going to do a video like that once I tidy everything up, but somehow manage to never get around to the haha! Good idea and I'll definitely try to get to that sometime soon.

  • @gurtelem3586
    @gurtelem3586 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love that you say curl rather than c-URL. I thought I was the only one

  • @omg-rtfm
    @omg-rtfm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    All I would offer as a critique is that pfSense can run OpenVPN so there's no need to separately run piVPN. Having said that, I LOVE piVPN for it's ease of set up, and use of WireGuard for a client. Great system. pfSense and piHole are awesome, love them. Thanks for the video :)

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah I mention that in the FAQ in description, but thanks for the constructive input and kind words!

    • @dohmarau
      @dohmarau ปีที่แล้ว

      and pfBlockerNG does the same thing as piHole anyhow, so you can run them all on the gateway (I do..) Only thing I use a pi for is GPS based stratum 0 NTP server

  • @Nexus9_KD6-4.8
    @Nexus9_KD6-4.8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Currently I'm using a traditional (albeit quite high-end) router but I'm using it mostly for its incredible wireless performance and as the network gateway. I've actually offloaded most of its functions onto a Raspberry Pi with the 64-bit Lite OS installed, such as DHCP, DNS, and PiHole and it has been working very well for me thus far. I would love to do this all in one complete solution one day though.

  • @crimsonkarma13
    @crimsonkarma13 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    watching your videos and getting into nas and more technical of the technical stuff has me feeling the same way i have felt when i was just getting into pc's
    at first i didnt know how it all worked or what the terminology all was but now a pc is the same as legos to me.
    now i hope to learn everything about nas and whatnot and make my own nas with a pc someday with the help of your videos

  • @annix493
    @annix493 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I’m literally doing almost exactly this project right now, and have been really struggling to get my Realtek 8125B 2.5Gbe NICs working, I ended up getting them *kinda* working with PfSense 2.5.2 yesterday, but wasn’t super stoked on having to use older software. Luckily I’ve barely gotten through configuration before coming across this video, so I’m going to re-flash 2.6.0 and try out the package from the Reddit post you linked. Man, my TH-cam recommendations are usually pretty good, but this? *Chef’s Kiss*.

    • @AD34534
      @AD34534 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You'd have better luck with Realtek drivers on OpenWrt since it's Linux.

  • @tigeroats913
    @tigeroats913 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Every new video u make gets better and better and I know it means nothing but I'm so proud of you, and I'm so happy I got to see ur channel grow from the start

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! That actually means a ton. 🙂

  • @haonnoah
    @haonnoah 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Not sure if it's been mentioned below, but what if you connect the LXC containers to a virtual switch and an extra interface for pfsense to route the LXC traffic without passing through a physical switch. This would force traffic directed to the LXC containers through PFSense (like PiHole) but ultimately would eliminate PFsense from routing from one physical interface to another physical interface to virtual interface in the container

    • @energyboy5696
      @energyboy5696 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's the sysadmin way of thinking. Much faster to have containerized, virtual switches when translating network traffic from VM to VM

  • @RayT314
    @RayT314 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    14:58 "I'd also like to have the time to brush up on my pfsense and networking skills before I make the SWITCH."
    Don't know if you missed the pun or were so smooth with the delivery you were trying to make it imperceptible that it was a pun.
    Either way, it was great.
    Loved the video and I make go down this path for my switch (😉) over from my Linksys off the shelf basic router/broadcast setup to a dedicated router with my Linksys as a wifi access point (at least that's how I think it should work, no real idea, I'll figure it out when I finally get there).
    If there's something else you (or anyone) would suggest over that potential setup let me know! I'm really only targeting 2.5GbE I think.

  • @angrynerd2103
    @angrynerd2103 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This comment section is definitely full of alternatives but if you want a few more, a useful alternative to pihole is adguard home. Does basicslly the same thing but it supports service based and regex based blocking. Additionally you can use unbound, either built into pfsense or installed in a vm or container. It allows for recursive dns lookups so you dont need a middle man like cloudflare and it offers great caching and speed.

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, I should've at least talked about unbound. I think I cut too much to try and keep the video from being too long. Thanks for the input!

  • @jonathanschober1032
    @jonathanschober1032 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    One thing you could do, although it’d be a bit more dependent on your router, but you could create a virtual bridge and attach it to proxmox and your pfsense VM, so proxmox would connect via pfsense, and all physical NICs would go to pfsense. Not necessarily a good idea, but an idea none the less

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      For sure! And that would give the benefit of virtio between PFSense vm and host/containers, but I lke the idea of PFSense having direct access to the hardware

    • @bcboncs
      @bcboncs ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HardwareHaven you're the first bare metal firewall person I've come across. I like how you did this virtual and snapshotted for baremetal. Can this same technique be done for usb booting? Did you not have any hardware issues beyond the NIC drivers? I am reading about all these compatibility considerations with freebsd. Thank you and great video!

  • @Tekgnome.
    @Tekgnome. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just built my firewall out of an old recycled Lenovo system with an i7 4770, threw in 16gb of ram, a 128gn boot SSD and a 10gb SFP+ card. I shoved it all in a 2u chassis and it's pretty solid for the age of it.

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sweet!

    • @BrianSimmons
      @BrianSimmons ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What's the power usage? I suspect buying a more modern power efficient device would actually save money in the long run. It's definitely something you need to consider when determining what devices to use.

  • @snowflakezzonPC
    @snowflakezzonPC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    I love these builds. Super cool video and you get to turn a small pc into something incredibly useful for home use.

  • @jettangeles2707
    @jettangeles2707 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I bought a refurbished OptiPlex 7040 with an i7-6700 and a 2x 10 GB NICs for like $200 and have OpenWrt. Best router ever.

  • @milktoastgregg
    @milktoastgregg ปีที่แล้ว

    hahaha I raised my eyebrow real hard when the QR for your wireguard access token popped up on the screen... very clever!

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hahaha I’m a bit surprised at the lack of comments I’ve seen on that. Hope you got a chuckle

  • @Quettesh
    @Quettesh ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was running similar setup, but it was too much hassle to tinker with it and even my current Mikrotik AX3 is way easier to maintain while running Pihole and Unboud in the container direactly on it. I haven't noticed any performance diffrenece. Another advantage is decent wifi coverage which AX3 has. Power consumtion is also way lower.

  • @martinbcooper
    @martinbcooper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice job. For services like pihole and httpd I switched to Docker containers a while ago, it makes management and backups nice and easy.

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I like docker outside of proxmox

  • @CauseOfBSOD
    @CauseOfBSOD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ive personally tried opnsense first, then pfsense
    i had some issues with opnsense (specifically the freeradius package was broken) but pfsense tends to work better. however pfsense is a bit less opensource than it claims to be

  • @Badsniperarmy
    @Badsniperarmy ปีที่แล้ว

    this is all so much for me but I can't wait to learn all this, I have a bunch of old laptops that I know they still have life in them just not as a traditional laptop! Maybe more so as a storage server, security camera service, and router!

  • @PeytonGaming526
    @PeytonGaming526 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro, wdym goofy? It's a work of art I love it!

  • @Casper042
    @Casper042 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This feels like a BUNCH of work that just isn't needed.
    Pickup a Lenovo Tiny M720q, which has an optional PCIe slot where you can drop in a 2nd NIC (I have a 4x1Gb in mine)
    Run the onboard NIC for the Hypervisor and pass through the entire PCIe NIC into the pfSense VM.
    You ARE limited to 1 x NVMe M.2 drive for storage with this design however.
    You can do a M720x instead which has Dual NVMe M.2 if you really want a dedicated pfSense drive.
    If you do this, look into the 32GB Intel Optane M.2 drive. pfSense doesn't need much storage and these are wicked fast.
    Anyway, no soldering, no weird adapters from Ali Express, and you can get up to 6 cores if you get the 8600/9600 or higher CPUs.

  • @blazini
    @blazini 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have several Seeed Odyssey's. Surprised both onboard NICs work with the M.2 NIC card plugged in, the Odyssey X86's have a hardware bug that kills one on-board NIC when some PCIE devices are plugged into the M.2 port. That said I also have alot of Odroid H2/H3 boards as well. The Odroid's are similar to the Seeed Odyssey but have 2 2.5gb NICs onboard and Odroid makes a "net-card" that adds 4 more 2.5gb NICs for a total of 6. I've been using one as my router for about 2 years now without a hitch. They also have cases that don't require mods for the net-card

  • @shinigamiauthor
    @shinigamiauthor ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As a graphic designer, this all makes my mind melt..... but I love your content anyway

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  ปีที่แล้ว

      Because of the complexity of the topic or because of the terrible graphic design? Haha

    • @shinigamiauthor
      @shinigamiauthor ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HardwareHaven complexity

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha gotcha. Both would’ve made sense 😂

  • @johntheawsomeful
    @johntheawsomeful 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Never thought I'd get excited over a router
    Subscribed lol

  • @UloPe
    @UloPe ปีที่แล้ว

    For just local DNS resolution you don’t need pihole. Pfsense has that built in. And it may actually be counterproductive not to use the pfsense one since you loose the automatic registration of dhcp client names in the dns namespace.

  • @blindtechh
    @blindtechh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love that video. I will be building my ultimate pfsense router soon

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nice! I definitely wouldn’t go this exact route as there’s probably much better options for hardware haha. Best of luck!

    • @blindtechh
      @blindtechh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HardwareHaven I know, I'm not going to do proxmox. I like to run dedicated machines in terms of routers and pi hole stuff.

  • @pepeshopping
    @pepeshopping ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool project box but you better have a backup one for when the main goes down.
    For quite less that price, you can get a fully enclosed device with same cpu and 4 Ethernet ports, ready to go.

  • @devincurrie4145
    @devincurrie4145 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Would help to say the expected price point to build such system. What about using OPNsense instead as I heard that pfsense does not receive updates often?
    I still have an old Apple AirPort Extreme router, which I haven’t use for years. Any chance I can hack into it by installing third party software replacing Apple’s software? Or better to build new hardware?

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      As far as price, I’m not really sure. I probably wouldn’t recommend the exact route I went as there are pretty affordable dual/quad NIC mini PCs on the market that would probably be a wiser choice.
      As far as hacking the AirPort Extreme, you’re on the wrong channel😂 Seems like a super cool idea, I’m just not smart enough to give any advice

  • @Treyshadow
    @Treyshadow ปีที่แล้ว

    Love this. I have been running same Seeed Odyssey for my router, but only for PFSense. This would be a fun modification... You got me thinking, but I already have an ESXi cluster in the house.

  • @xellaz
    @xellaz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pretty neat router you got there! I recently just added a 2nd Wireguard VPN on my Pi5 as a backup for those public wi-fi areas that doesn't allow you to connect using the default 51820 port. I have it running on a docker container and everything is running great after a few tweaks. My main router is a Firewalla Gold Plus that is also a hardware firewall and has tons of features. It also has a built-in Wireguard/OPVN and ads & telemetry blocking features. I'm still curious to run Pi-Hole with Wireguard on my Pi5 though and I'm having a little trouble with that on my network. I was able to successfully run Pi-Hole on another docker container and even have it running on https complete with SSL certs using NGINX proxy manager but when I use it as my DNS on my Wireguard on my Pi5, there is no Internet. I see the traffic being blocked though by Pi-Hole and all the stats in the Dashboard are running. I think I need to forward the traffic correctly but time is limited and I'll try to troubleshoot that on another time. 😮‍💨

  • @adrianmurillo2646
    @adrianmurillo2646 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thats is some clean hardware!

  • @FerrariFilippo
    @FerrariFilippo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! Total cost?

  • @RealJustPotato
    @RealJustPotato 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That is a pretty nice router you got there,
    Thanks for the good video!

  • @jimoberhansli7782
    @jimoberhansli7782 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I saw the saw (no pun intended) in the intro and clicked immediately to the next video. Nothing against this video, I just don‘t have the time, competence and resources to handiwork any parts.

    • @skinwalker69420
      @skinwalker69420 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's completely unnecessary. I did a similar setup on an old thin client PC without any kind of sawing.

  • @NotToBeTooTakenSeriously
    @NotToBeTooTakenSeriously ปีที่แล้ว +2

    how did this entire project cost?

  • @helvettefaensatan
    @helvettefaensatan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've never run a server. I think getting one could be a step up for my computing projects.
    Do you have any principles/recommendations for when to use a separate hardware? What 'deserves' it's own OS in a Proxmox setup, when should I just run stuff bare metal, and what can be rune in the same virtual environment?
    I'm thinking of getting a pi-hole, creating my own file server for access and storage (linked to some form of backup), run some other self hosted services, and to tinker - without knowing exactly what I mean by that yet.

  • @saiyantwan
    @saiyantwan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    For some reason I can never seem to wrap my head around running a router in a vm whether it is in proxmox, vmware, or any other kind of hypervisor. something about the routing seems to break my brain.

  • @walkingmanvideo9455
    @walkingmanvideo9455 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now this is what TH-cam should be about, intelligent people presenting interesting and positive video content. Thanks.

  • @victornecromancer
    @victornecromancer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good that i can learn from you and the people from the comments that tell about more eficient/alternative ways to do these things. Also have to wait for family to go out to tinker with the network lol

  • @atcaotien9235
    @atcaotien9235 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you, watching hardware stuff always feel so interesting!

  • @gchats
    @gchats 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey haven. Could you tell me how you assigned the NICs and what you connected to each NIC during testing? Use the frame in 8:04 for reference.
    Oh, and what you connected to each NIC at the final setup please.

  • @franzpleurmann2585
    @franzpleurmann2585 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I recently switched back to pfSense on bare metal because it is quite complicated to configure VLANs on a linux network bridge if you cant passthrough two dedicated nics.

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, as cool as VLANs can be... I have a painful history with them lol

    • @bcboncs
      @bcboncs ปีที่แล้ว

      Have any recommendations for how that hardware and base os design looks with pfsense on bare metal?

  • @user.A9
    @user.A9 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is there a link for the dual M.2 NIC?

  • @CatalinMinulescu
    @CatalinMinulescu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If I understand well, you have build an "Ultimate Router" on a mini PC which cost around 200 USD ?
    Niiiiiceeee ... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @moosematrix
    @moosematrix 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just heard about using Pfsense & Pi hole recently and I want to emulate this project!!

  • @xpatrikpvp
    @xpatrikpvp ปีที่แล้ว

    the dedicated ssd for pfsense is a great idea

  • @haydenc2742
    @haydenc2742 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I prefer OPNSense, it is updated MUCH more often, and natively supports zenarmor, plus it works with MANY more nics types than PFsense, I have both, but prefer OPNSense
    Either way, Love that you have it setup on PROXMOX and I too have mine setup the same way, pihole, and pivpn on a separate debian install in my PROXMOX box
    Great howto, great build!
    Keep em coming!!!!

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks! And opnSense is definitely on my “try it out” list.

  • @gchats
    @gchats ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You lost me at "OTP" xD. Although I'm 15 years old I do want to try and get the CCNA certificate.

    • @canes4ever162
      @canes4ever162 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can totally do it!

    • @gchats
      @gchats 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@canes4ever162thanks! I do need to advance in my networking knowledge.
      Little late to this 😅 though

    • @canes4ever162
      @canes4ever162 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gchats are you still studying for the CCNA? Good network talent is hard to come by right now

  • @spiritvateme
    @spiritvateme ปีที่แล้ว

    Thats super sweet quick question can i put my phone tu run okta an dpoint it to read different location

  • @Cyhawkx
    @Cyhawkx ปีที่แล้ว

    Your link to the Shure SMB7 is wrong in the description, takes people to their orders ;)

  • @joaommartins0
    @joaommartins0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice touch with the QR code.

  • @KlausDieter764
    @KlausDieter764 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why not using the wireguard that pfsense already have?

  • @andrewsontop
    @andrewsontop 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    does this need an existing router to make pfsense make a 2nd router or pfsense is the router and doesnt need any existing ones? cuz i changed home and idont have router but i have a raspberry pi

  • @hoekbrwr
    @hoekbrwr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    deepdive for me already at a supesonic pace! I am looking for something much simpler by means of VLANs.

  •  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Always nice to have more control over router and clans ect.
    But setting up iptv from the ISP can be a pain to setup properly.
    I noticed myself doing so. IGMP needs to be enabled or other protocols, depending on how your ISP handles iptv.
    And you don't want to piss off others in the household. 😋
    Going fiber is also a different challenge depending on compatible hardware.

  • @mrbumchinz1991
    @mrbumchinz1991 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can pfsence do multi internet bonding?
    Whats the best hardware for this project

  • @hummel6364
    @hummel6364 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Biggest problem I see here is that you think VMs are heavy, they really aren't that heavy anymore. A VM running a light system such as FreeBSD is extremely light and has minimal overhead.

  • @TheKd4lyfe
    @TheKd4lyfe 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think I may go this route, proxmox, pfsense, pi-hole, VPN, home assistant, NAS.
    Sick of my current router dropping out

  • @swordfish6975
    @swordfish6975 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's possible to do it all on one nic using a managed switch (I have the unifi 5 port), you just have to use vlans. It's how I have my network setup right now, proxmox with OPNsense.

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep, but I don't want to do that if I don't have to.

  • @Rob-dd3mn
    @Rob-dd3mn ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have seen those dual 2.5g nics on Aliexpress before, as you know a 2.5g nic can operate at 5gb in full duplex mode if transferring files from machine to machine over the lan. With 2, that's 10gbs worth of bandwidth. Can the PCIE interface support that much speed?

  • @macmaniac3080
    @macmaniac3080 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice! Been looking to build a box like this!

  • @jokroast6912
    @jokroast6912 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'll be waiting for the followup

  • @rethinking3289
    @rethinking3289 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you can save more resources by using pfblocker on pfsense itself instead of pihole. Its the same with more features.

  • @anthonyrussano
    @anthonyrussano 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you. i would like to follow in your footsteps to create a similar setup. i have been using cloudflare tunnels instead of setting up wireguard... but i totally used to run pi hole and pivpn on bare metal raspberry pis and it worked great. i would like to setup those services again as part of my proxmox

  • @emilemouannes2236
    @emilemouannes2236 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was wondering how to do you access your proxmox web interface from? Did you connect the proxmox lan bridge to the pfsense lan physically or virtually? Or are you accessing your proxmox web ui from your other router and on a different network?

  • @PocketDrummer
    @PocketDrummer 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'd really love to see how you would do something like this without relying entirely on chinese hardware. Considering the near-constant state-sponsored attacks on western countries, I wouldn't touch any of those with a 10ft pole. I'm sure there's a way to do it affordably without those products.

    • @schlickit628
      @schlickit628 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think the same thing. Not so much because it’s Chinese per se, it’s just so niche there can’t be a lot of eyeballs on it.
      When I set up my router I was trying to imagine what is least likely to have undiscovered hardware vulnerabilities… I settled on a rpi4 running openwrt.

    • @cantprocess
      @cantprocess 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Meanwhile the phone or computer you used to write this message was made where exactly?

  • @brostoevsky22
    @brostoevsky22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The blackhole router. Cool shit broski!

  • @pivot3india
    @pivot3india ปีที่แล้ว

    can you recommend a cellular card for odyssey in the same setup ?

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  ปีที่แล้ว

      No sorry, I’ve never messed around with 4g modules or anything

  • @4856294zeeshan
    @4856294zeeshan ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, we have captive portal networking in our building with radius server and voucher system,
    to access the internet each user have to purchase its own voucher,
    In our area internet is very expressive so plz tell us how can we use a router to login in to this network using single voucher and using router as a bridge to connect other 5 smart phones, and please also tell us which router is suitable for this type of networking
    Thanks

  • @danney777
    @danney777 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a single question for a more personal preference...can this be done with OpenWRT?

  • @yushk19
    @yushk19 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great vid! I've been watching a few of your videos and really enjoying your music as well(Town Groove is a bop!). Any plans on releasing any of these?

  • @siwiskate
    @siwiskate ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video!
    I quite liked the idea of being able to boot from the passthrough drive in case something happens to Proxmox. In fact, I was trying to replicate it, moving my currently virtualized OPNSense to a spare drive, and realised something...
    If the EFI Disk lives in the LVM/ZFS Proxmox pool, would one still be able to boot from the OPNSense drive, bypassing Proxmox?

  • @sarundayo
    @sarundayo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A top LCD for moitoring and pretty display would have been the cherry on top. Wouldn''t even need a monitor to see what's the deal inside.

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah that would be pretty sweet… I bet something could be rigged together especially with the GPIO

  • @fastshuther
    @fastshuther ปีที่แล้ว

    You should of cut the extra screw length popping out of the diy shield, just in case it doesn’t make ground somehow

  • @dkalata
    @dkalata 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Found this video not too longer ago, and thought I would assemble the components and try to build out the same "ultimate" router. I am only at the parts assembly stage, and I think my question is a simple one.
    Anyone know the part number for the HDD/SSD power cable?

  • @Subgeta
    @Subgeta ปีที่แล้ว

    What about ventilation? Does it get hot? Over heat c/would be an issue. How is it running after 4mo.?

  • @datboi8140
    @datboi8140 ปีที่แล้ว

    do you need to have that specific seeed board with the RP2040 raspberry pi chip for this, or can you use older seeed model 4105 = ATSAMD21 chip?

  • @gordr8024
    @gordr8024 ปีที่แล้ว

    What through put are you getting with this will it do gig-bite through put from isp to network

  • @krum1985
    @krum1985 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    That looks interesting. I would love to try a similar build myself at some point. I think I would use Bind instead of PiHole for my DNS though 😄

    • @Se9n.
      @Se9n. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      PFsense has a blind service and a wire guard service so separate containers wouldn't be needed

    • @SerpentDrago
      @SerpentDrago ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Already in pfsense no reason for separate

  • @sandamalgamage1242
    @sandamalgamage1242 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this channel. Thank u shareing your experince and Knowledge with us❤❤

  • @athstreamsandmore
    @athstreamsandmore 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Virtualizing these services, how does ram utilization work with Proxmox?

  • @JoJoJenkns
    @JoJoJenkns 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What connecters are you using on your bottom NIC. That thing lights up the whole LAN connector likes it is a Christmas tree, or is they just the angle of the camera?

  • @anthonyrussano
    @anthonyrussano 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i need a refresher course on setting up proxmox with pci passthrough. i have this gpu i want to use that's just collecting dust

  • @JordanPlayz158
    @JordanPlayz158 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    4:55 interesting use for pi-hole, PFSense (or at least OPNSense) actually comes with Unbound DNS which I use personally that supports what you mean, it is under DNS Overrides tab and you can do exactly what you described.

  • @obvionaoe
    @obvionaoe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should look into Ansible in case you haven't used it before :)

  • @albundy7718
    @albundy7718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I didnt watch the previous Video about the Hardware, but for People that dont want to build such a Device themselves their is a (not so cheap) Alternative. You can buy a (china-made) passively cooled Mini-PC with a N5105 Intel CPU and 4x 2.5 Gbit Intel LAN Ports barebone for around $200 (without Sodimm DDR4 RAM and an SSD)

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      For sure! I probably should’ve been clear that this is NOT the best route hardware-wise. However it was more fun lol

    • @albundy7718
      @albundy7718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@HardwareHaven Yes of course. I just noticed the similarity to these Devices.

    • @DynMads
      @DynMads 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HardwareHaven So what makes it ultimate? The software?

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The fact that it’s a router (with 2 LANs one of which is 2.5Gb), VPN server, and Pi-hole server all in one nifty little box. Obviously there are more impressive routers, hence ultimate being in “”s

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      To be clear, the 2.5gb is essentially useless at the moment, which is why I didn’t really talk about it. I mostly just wanted a dual mic to M.2. But if I ever upgrade to >1Gb Ethernet, I can switch ports around and take advantage of it without needing to upgrade.

  • @doddezx
    @doddezx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you are useing PiHole just for DNS and not adblock etc just use the one thats built into PFsense its really solid

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I do plan to use some as blocking, but I just need to dial in some white listing to not break streaming devices and such lol

  • @Stev.3n
    @Stev.3n 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Same camp with the swap lol. Still running the old Unifi USG-3P even after I've started getting a pfsense box ready and have been doing some testing. It's currently been good and I have other Unifi gear, dynamic DNS and OpenVpn access server but I've considered switching to wireguard.

  • @ichilvers
    @ichilvers ปีที่แล้ว

    Are there any throughput stats on this as a working router? So it can be compared to a Draytek router for example.

  • @crimsonkarma13
    @crimsonkarma13 ปีที่แล้ว

    im new to all this but turning your pc into a router sounds amazing, and with you changing your router entirely, what do isp say about doing that?

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I still use the modem provided by my ISP, it’s just that the router is now behind it

  • @philippemiller4740
    @philippemiller4740 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It seems that all the services you need to "add" can also be found in pfsense like haproxy, pfblockerng, vpn server, dans resolver, etc

    • @HardwareHaven
      @HardwareHaven  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Check the FAQ in description or pinned comment 👍🏻
      You’re correct but I still have some reasons why I chose what I did