Putin's war aims no longer viable if British troops land in Ukraine
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ต.ค. 2024
- "Putin has got away with too much."
A deployment of UK troops into Ukraine would show Russia that Zelensky has "long term international support" and Russia's approach will not work in comparison, says Director of Military Sciences at RUSI, Matthew Savill.
Join this channel to get access to perks -
/ @listentotimesradio
📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.c...
🗞 Subscribe to The Times www.thetimes.c...
📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.c...
When the Russians are straight into the comments saying 'this would be a bad move', 'this would make no difference'.....it almost certainly would make a difference and would be massive problem for Putin.
Yes, suggestions like this always garner lots of comments from crying Putin rent boys.
Ukraine got played
@des_smith7658 thanks for telling us what you are sensitive about "des".
The uk millitary wouldn't make any difference to the outcome and would just make uk a legitimate target, when America assessed UK capabilities it was revealed that we had supplies for 2 weeks of combat, and that was before we handed everything to Ukraine
@@francisyockey8225 So 5% of our tank fleet constitutes "everything" to you does it? The UK military generally makes a significant outcome to the wars it fights in as I recall from my history lessons, unlike russia who often choke when attacked (with WW2 as the exception, but then they lost 20Million plus people).
We pressed Ukraine to give up their nuclear weapons and sign the Budapest Memorandum which said we would help them if they were invaded, if they still had their nuclear weapons Russia wouldn’t have invaded them.
er okay
The nukes were Russian 🤡, they would never leave them in Ukraine
Ukraine never had nukes. They were always under control of Moscow. The same way Germany, Turkey Britain etc have to rely on the usa for their nukes.
@CatherineMitchell-vw3ix Ukraine never had operational control of these weapons.
@@boota1979 You really think they wouldn't have gained that control in the years since. Get real, all the infrastructure for that "control" was at the silos already. This is just an admission you have no clue how these weapons function.
Britain, the USA and Russia(!) all guaranteed Ukrainian territorial integrity in 1994. Sending a training team to Ukraine is entirely consonant with that guarantee. We can factor in the occasional British military casualties, but as they won't be in the front line these will be limited.
Already plenty of British EU and US casualties. Flown back in the dead of night and their families "obligated" to fill in NDAs
I think it’s time for all of NATO to put boots on the ground and end this thing.
@@A_Bunch_of_Savageswhere has nato ever fought anyone formidable on the ground? I’ll wait.
@@mustaphacham338 I guess it’s a good thing they won’t have to fight anyone that’s formidable.
They, let us "GARATEE" Russian borders and land....
😂😂😂😂😂
I wounder why Europe are not anouncing their red lines! if you bring North Korean troops, we will intervene. If you send more Iranian drones and missiles, we will intervene, etc…
Because you're incapable of taking any action without the US.
Whatever Russians say with any enthusiasm you know the opposite is true...They are such a bizzare people 😂😂
@@zoomeraygun1 Russians and Ukrainians are basically the same slavic people
At least they are honest unlike those I could mention.
❤Ukraine ❤
Don't be timid. UK Left EU because they wanted to do things their own way.
UK saving the EU again! Well done boys!
In reality 52% of the British voters "wanted to do things their own way", largely because they had no grasp of the consequences of their decision and even now won't even acknowledge those consequences let alone take responsibility for them.
@@clementine7582😂 what utter nonsense you talk.
Send in Prince Harry 😅
Send in prince Chally
NATO has to protect Ukraine.
Why?
When is the authorization for long range missiles??????
Do you think that's wise
@@des_smith7658No,he just thinks Kindjal will miss him.
Firstly, there are not enough missiles. They need to be air-launched and guided by American-owned GPS. Besides, the Russians have proved to be able to jam the needed GPS signals. Lastly, how many planes do the Ukrainians presently have?
@@stephenkoludrovic-q5p But Russia can't jam Neptune missiles though. Didn't one hit a Shahed storage facility in Krasnodar Krai overnight?
@@stephenkoludrovic-q5p You have always good excuses to not do what we need to do
Vlad like any good manager needs to get down on to the front line and experience the 'meat grinder' at first hand, to fully understand what his troops are going through. I think he should aim to spend at least a week there on the frontline. This should improve things.
you could say the same for all the politicians driving this lunacy
As if he cares about his troops. He only cares about their gains, and nothing and no one else
I think Mr Poo-Tin prefers to be in one of his luxury Palaces...
Ahh Conscription makes sense now
Wouldn't need conscripts. This is not WW2. We didn't need conscripts in Afghanistan or Iraq. Russia is already depleted, and it will be an easy war to win.
But there isn't any, well there is in Russia, twice a year in fact.
No mention of the Coup.
coup?
😢the simple answer his have a special military operation in Finland and Poland's bye all NATO countries showing Putin we mean business no more kid gloves with the dictatorship
In English please?
@@martinhawley2401 LOL You lot can't do anything without your American masters.
@@martinhawley2401 LOL You sure showed the Taliban who was boss.
ukrainian peace plan as per UN September 2024 Zalensky Speech :
1 nuclear security
2 energy security
3 food security
4 exchange of prisoners
5 territorial sovereignity
6 withdawl of russian forces
7 prosecution of war criminals
8 restoration of the environment
9 no more invasions (joining NATO)
10 sign off
These can be negotiated seperately and number 4 ....prisoner exchange .....is ongoing.
Gaza should have a similar one.
Russia is not suffering "ridiculous casualties". We will know when they have reached unsustainable proportions when it mobilizes. I suspect that before that point they will stop attacking, declare victory and see what Ukraine and its backers do next. That will be a difficult moment.
@@markaxworthy2508 depends on your definition of ridiculous
@@joelee3716 Explain, please.
@@joelee3716man they haven't even started mobilisation. They still have 100s of thousands of conscripts.
@@joelee3716 russia fight with active + contractors ,, reserve is not even touuched ,, population is far away . Ukraine fight with active + reserve + conttstcors+population to 22 years .
Training troops in Ukraine isn't comparable to fighting troops.
British troops in Ukraine ? What a delusional dude with magical thinking.
You can fill up Wembley Stadium with all the available mission capable soldiers and still have 30,000 empty seats !
Except Times Radio staff, no British want to go the front lines against Russia.
There are plenty of volunteers, not that that really matters because the army goes wherever they are told to go. You really don't understand how democracy works, do you?
Democracy? What democracy uk same as germany only follow usa/israil orders.
Unless whole of nato decides to put boots on the ground, nothing major will happen. The inexperienced volunteers will be a liability to the Ukrainians and easy prey for the battle hardened Russians.
Now is the time to ramp up support for Ukraine.
Wetherby Penbridge will save us all with their advanced tech child soldiers of the future from the Home Counties
And Ukraine is suffering no casualties ? . According to leaked Pentagon papers Ukraines losses are seven time higher
Nato now admits Ukraine is losing territory but try and gain a propaganda victory by talking of huge Russian losses . In fact 2024 has been the lowest losses for Russia in the entire war
@@TrevorCrook-c1s 🤡
@@TrevorCrook-c1s Sure refard. 🤡
Found another Russian bot.
@@TrevorCrook-c1s there was an interesting interview in russian of a soldier saying 30 russian soldiers being beaten by 6 ukranians. He was quite surprised how bad it js at the front considering what the media says. Certainly there are many deaths.
Russia often doesn't tell their families I guess at least it saves money.
@@joelee3716 Things that didn't happen.
German here: As much as i appreciate the UKs strong support for Ukraine, i don't really understand their motivation. Given their geographical island position and their close relationship with the US, they are pretty safe and could just sit back and relax, and only start getting concered when Russia has taken Poland and Germany. But here there are doing more than any other European country. Can anyone explain?
I’m half German and half British. Principals dear boy! We got caught with our pants down in 1939…
If anybody controls Europe, then they won't be safe for long. Divide and conquer is one aspect but divide and not be conquered is another.
It's called not being selfish and transactional. There are principles at stake here.
I suppose we have a Tradition of saving Europe from tyranny?
@@stephenhill545 Defending a corrupt dictator who never stops demanding money?
British military is not strong like British empire😂😂😂
Very true. Nobody is stating it is. Actually the British Army wasn't very strong in the days of the Empire either. 😂😂😂 I put those laughing faces in because you seem to like them.
The British Empire in it's later days was, as the Japanese Commander said at the Fall of Singapore, a paper tiger. At Singapore in 1942, the British forces were dreadful, and the Japanese commander accused them of cowardice and incompetence. It hasn't really improved, and their best soldiers are the Scots.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣the British! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
This is crazy analysing, the nato tacticains are already there and they are losing badly. This is why all news from there has largely stopped
Source?
Because you know so much
@@Silures11 his source is Putin
@@Silures11 every reputable strategic think tank, including ISW. You're welcome.
In a few weeks' time, France will be inaugurating an underground headquarters in Lille specifically dedicated to a major conflict with Russia.
And what have the Ukranians lost? We will not know the truth of this war until it is long over.
We shouldn’t be getting directly involved just like we shouldn’t have illegally invaded Iraq.
Which time, there were 2 invasions of Iraq. Second this isn't even close to the same thing at all. Not being involved became impossible the moment Russia invaded, your only real choice now is defending Ukraine or roll your belly over to Putin.
Would you sit happily at home while your neighbour abuses his kids?
All support delivered unnecessarily late due to hand wringing and more so deliberations of lawyers in the west.
SLAVA UKRAINI !
Are we sure it’s not massive hubris to think that the UK and the US can “train” these Ukrainian soldiers better than they can themselves….? At this point they have vastly more experience fighting a European ground war than we have in 80 years. I’m surprised we’re not trying to learn from THEM.
They have to train them in Ukraine because they are forced conscripts and many will flee or demand asylum if they make it out of the ukraine
Russia will do whatever is necessary to achieve the aims of the SMO & no interventions by the UK will make a modicum of difference apart from putting the UK in danger.
‘If’
Three sleepless years…the world might end for “him”…
Matthew is back to collect Rupert's thirty pieces of silver.
Lots of Russian bots in the comments. Looks like the Russians are triggered by this.
Times Radio = Triggering Russian Trollski's
@@richiecooke69 Yes. 👍.
"Everyone is a bot if they don't think the same as I have been told to think"
@@Roar1987 A bot is an automation and therefore cannot think. You need to understand the difference between a bot and a troll
It’s simply ludicrous that’s why! It’s like Guyana saying we can go toe to toe with the USA.
Lol. Do you seriously think Putin and Russia are remotely bothered by our tinpot military? Get real.
Ur
Bro... everyone knows uk is stronger than ukraine... And ukraine has russia stuck in a quagmire all by itself without doubling its strength.
Not even close to being true, Ukraine had a huge arsenal with 1000s of tanks and 100s of air defence platforms. The uk has about 40 working tanks and no air defence systems. Ukraine would have stomped uk in a ground war
UK has nukes and very strong relationships with the biggest armies in the world.. Russia has crippled old men forced to die for their dictator without proper strategy or even basic kit
Putin's own threats without action prove you wrong.
Late WW1 British strategy of “bite and hold” adopter by Russia. Does not work as Ukraine has materiel support from NATO.
Wait for about 3 weeks. Trump will be the President and kick out Zelensky along with Johnson and Stanmer.
Blimey, the UK will be sending Ronnie Pickering next in an effort to "turn the irreversible tide" :) Pure Keystone stage entered now😅😅
Pootin is delusional 🙄 in 🤡 his imperialistic dreams😂😂
Putin is the Hero of Russia.
Odd how times radio always manages to make it sound like Russia is on the verge of defeat, while the economist, says the exact opposite.
both sides can be on the verge of defeat - why is that so hard for you to grasp? This war is a horrific battle of will and attrition, where Ukraine have the will and are attriting russian at two or three to one ratios, but russia has the will to take those losses and keep pushing. Both sides can be close to losing and close to winning simultaneously as a couple more heavy blows could lead to defeat for the other.
We in the UK need to keep quiet.
We do not have the size of military anymore to do anything.
We lack ships, planes and people.
We need to support, with money, French and other continental countries who can develop and supply the weapons needed.
Sweden, France amongst others have a strong defence sector. Let them lead.
We are finished as a military power………let it be…
dont think so....britain is a nuclear armed member of the security council and London is not just england ...but is a centre for the english speaking nations.... 5 eyes ...MI6 and many many other connections....and though our enemies hate us the Russians and Moslems all want to come here ??? ..Russians and Moslems are not welcome any feckin more...we are FULL but Slava Ukraini & Heroyam Slava ...we like these fellas ....and if u ever meet one u can tell why...great people.
I tune into Times Radio purely for a laugh, hilarious stuff. Now I'm switching off, bye
Show us the evidence of Russian casualties.
@@annunnaki5013 the russian soldiers saying they had to crawl over the bodies to surrender.
@@annunnaki5013 ok refard. 🤡
@@joelee3716 Fake news
Plenty of footage of z troops moaning about it.
@@joelee3716 that doesn't prove the amount of casualties
Comedy gold 😂
Ukraine lost because NATO was reluctant to help.....
Ukraine hasn't lost.
@@kurtfrancis4621 It has.
@@CountDuckEggno, it hasn’t. How’s ruzzian economy going?
@@CountDuckEgglongest 3 day operation ever huh?
How's the body count now for you orcs?
Britain is not a passive player and does not operate in war like it does in peace.........we are much better at war .
we discovered....and named ....the ATOMIC BOMB....so who knows what "we" have brewed up today ?
Rutherford ‘split the atom‘ at The University of Manchester In 1917. Oppenheimer brought the project to Los Alamos in New Mexico because detonating an atomic bomb in Britain is not advisable because of Health , Safety and Environmental issues ...would say ?
Echoes of History : World War 2 1939
While America was dithering, and not in the War at that stage, Britain was getting busy.
In charge of the country’s primitive secret atom bomb committee was Victor (Lord) Rothschild. He was a scientist, though not a nuclear physicist, but he understood the wider implications, and not only did he have the right contacts he was embedded in the country’s security services, with a whole host of different roles.
While the appeaser Neville Chamberlain was prime minister in 1939, Rothschild had an ally in Winston Churchill, then First Lord of the Admiralty.
Churchill had been impressed by his friend H. G. Wells who in his 1914 novel, The World Set Free, had coined the phrase “atomic bomb”.
Churchill talked of atomic energy as “a source of power so potent that a man might carry in his hand the energy to light a city for a year, fight a fleet of battleships, or drive one of our giant liners across the Atlantic”.
Churchill had grasped the danger of technology running ahead of morality in an article in the Pall Mall Gazette in 1924 in which he asked: “Shall we all commit suicide?
STILL RELEVANT TODAY
IF
They are delusional here😂!
Pootin is delusional 🙄 🤣 😂
Send in the Daleks for the win
Britons believe they are superpowers because they are members of NATO you know they cannot engage Russia on their own. They cannot even make decisions about Russia without seeking authorization of the U.S
@a.u.b1 Sure, refard. 🤡
@. I have hurt your feelings, poor you🤣🤣🤣
The presenter needs to get a better mike or a better sound engineer!!
Ukraine is on the verge of total defeat, as winter approaches, the hair-brained and costly Kursk operation fails, a different settlement falls every week, further defensive lines collapse in many regions and Zelensky cuts a dejected figure again passing the cap around European capitals yesterday.
Haha, if your delusion helps you cope 😂
Bad ruzzian bot! Bad!
@richiecooke69 Ukrainian army is cracking under pressure, these 50 year olds won't last another 2 years. Russian is recruiting more than they are losing. Prokrovsk and Siversk will fall in next 6 months, then Kramatorsk.
What a lieing joker . Pure BS
HOPE you send them . Give them a few weeks at most idiots
Just troops even if the best trained wont make much difference, the Uk will have to move a lot of heavy equipment to impact the battlefield towards ukraine victory.
I'm a bit wary of loose 'call his bluff' talk.
We should continue to support Ukraine, but stop taunting unecessarily in the media.
@@JonScott-jv8jgHave you seen what Russian media is saying?
Oh, please - the British military is not feared by any nation!
Imbecile
precisely because we are a fair army who fight following the geneva convention of human rights.
How much do you get paid per comment, Ivan?
@@Etienne-ck3tr OK refard. 🤡👍
Yeah meanwhile your spetsnaz are fkn useless when civilians take them out.
The SAS however.... There's a reason why EVERY SPEC OPS UNIT ON EARTH copied them.
So many Ru-bots 😂. They are scared.
I don't know about Russian bots, bit if you English want to fight Russia, don't bring us Scots into it. Fight your wars yourselves for a change. KEEP US SCOTS OUT OF IT.
A deployment of UK troops into Ukraine would show Russia that Zelensky has "long term international support" No it wouldnt, it would show it had NATO support. The rest of the world wants peace not more escalation.
Bro, as a member of the rest of the world, no it doesn't.
the rest of the world doesnt think like that. That's how a russian thinks the rest of the world thinks.
It would be a fake peace and surrender. Leaving the problem for another generation
we could have peace tomorrow if russia withdrew so why blame anyone else for this?
@@leet3207 Deescalation through escalation not surrender.
People who advocate surrender have no clue how the world works and no comprehension of the longterm consequences globally.
I kinda hope we dont ever have a conflict between Nato forces and a Russia/China alliance
It may be in Chinas interests to stay out of it - other than grabbing some territory in Russias east.
There is no "russia/China alliance" China doesn't give a s**t about russia. They just want cheap hydrocarbons. Otherwise why isn't China prepared to openly send them military aid or pay for trade in rubles? It's a one way deal for China.
Trigger by what? The British joke Army. They will never come back alive from Russia!
Assuming you are russian/chinese?
@@shuathe2nd No im american I just dont want to see tens of thousands maybe even millions of lives lost, war’s arnt one sided.
well okay you are a kind of tv show but the brits are not going to land in Ukrania
they already have....britain does not operate in war like it does in peace..we are much better at war .
we discovered....and named ....the ATOMIC BOMB....so who knows what they have brewed up today ?
Rutherford ‘split the atom‘ at The University of Manchester In 1917. Oppenheimer brought the project to Los Alamos in New Mexico because detonating an atomic bomb in Britain was not practical but they did consider a site in north western scotland.
Echoes of History : World War 2 1939
While America was dithering, and not in the War at that stage, Britain was getting busy.
In charge of the country’s primitive secret atom bomb committee was Victor (Lord) Rothschild. He was a scientist, though not a nuclear physicist, but he understood the wider implications, and not only did he have the right contacts he was embedded in the country’s security services, with a whole host of different roles.
While the appeaser Neville Chamberlain was prime minister in 1939, Rothschild had an ally in Winston Churchill, then First Lord of the Admiralty.
Churchill had been impressed by his friend H. G. Wells who in his 1914 novel, The World Set Free, had coined the phrase “atomic bomb”.
Churchill talked of atomic energy as “a source of power so potent that a man might carry in his hand the energy to light a city for a year, fight a fleet of battleships, or drive one of our giant liners across the Atlantic”.
Churchill had grasped the danger of technology running ahead of morality in an article in the Pall Mall Gazette in 1924 in which he asked: “Shall we all commit suicide?
STILL RELEVANT TODAY
I’d put the UK well ahead in anything other than a land war, air, sea, sub-sea… any land based offensive would need the full range of force multipliers in-field with the necessary logistics, fast air, attack helicopters, artillery, engineers, the whole thing on a very small scale. To fight them on the scale that they are engaged in would not be to the UK’s advantage, the Russians will just flatten an area with artillery and glide bombs, it just wouldn’t work.
Even the Uk by itself has more than enough military might to eliminate that threat in the air. Or maybe you didn't know that the UK was as involved as the US in helping Israel develop their "Iron Dome" defense. Russia no longer poses a major threat to anyone outside their own territory.
Do you get paid per commnet, Ivan?
One thing is 100% sure: British troops will never come back alive from Russia!
Go on the British Army.....those plethora of Pronouns and gender neutral squaddies will soon have Russia ducking for cover😅😅😅
The whole British army will not be any different. How many are they, and are they even prepared for war?
About 35,000 infantry. Russia loses that many men a month.
The British Army IS an Army, not a group of conscripts forced to fight. Big difference.
@@markaxworthy2508 if that is true . No one needs to worry, Russia will collapse on its own due to the losses.can the UK take d same losses?
@@EKL-qu7ih an army not battle tested or harden. Even the Ukraine army is far superior to the UK at this point of the war.
@@EKL-qu7ih Yup, but it is very small army with few trained reserves and no conscription to magnify its strength. You make conscription sound like a bad thing in these circumstances. Conscription is what keeps the Ukrainian Army in the field.
Have you ever read the Emperor has no clothes? You and your friends. Should be a good learning opportunity for you all.
russia certainly is bereft of the weapons it claimed to have prior to 2022
Russia's armed forces are incompetent enough. Keep sending them money and supplies and let Ukraine fight them. British training will make little difference except increasing the possibility of of making this actually worse.
Better send your national footbal team if you want a win 😂. ...and they will all come back alive!
@jorgecastro5834 Lets hope it doesn't go to penalties!
Ukraine is rising as new super power in EU . UK is very surprised to see that Ukraine is new super in EU
ukraine must have some very desirable resources
That's right. That's why Putin launched his offensive before the lithium mines in the Donbass began to be exploited. That's why he confiscated Ukrainian platforms in the Black Sea in 2014. He aims to remain the Great Master of Europe's resources.
The Donbas region contributed to 70% of Ukrainian's GDP.
Fake news
Prove it
Lol..always if..but never based on reality
Israel is at war, that sadly means America has moved to the Middle East. Ukraine will be forgotten as Afghanistan was. Kievs only hope is EU picks up slack. Ukraine military, air defense, power grid, Eastern/Southern fronts, are all crumbling. Unconditional Surrender will be unavoidable in 2025, without peace talks.
Why can't a Multi-National Task Force be assembles and move it to Ukraine to provide military assistance to Ukraine? Or would that be perceived as 'provocation' by Poo-Tin?
Should we even care? We tried that silly approach in the 1930s.It led to fascism in Spain, Austria, etc.
This is a a good play, nato should step in, not militarily but the Russians won't shoot at Ukraine targets if nato is embedded there
The British are afraid to admit their troops are already in Ukraine supporting Kyiv Regime and dying in vain.
In Ukraine
British troops 0, Ruzzia 1200 a day
Ukraine has already comprehensively lost this war.
You all are delusional.
Eh? Are you sure 😂
Oh look!
Yet another person who does nothing but make posts that require zero knowledge of the content of the video the isn't in the title.
How Russian!
Still Kyiv in 3 days? 😂😂😂
@@SirDigby3601
Go ask general Mark Milkey about that. No Russian can answer that.
Are you Ghost of Kiev?
A deployment of British troops to Ukraine???? No thankyou. Is the Govt seriously thinking of this???
Are you worried that you have to fight the UK too?
russian shills getting worried by the end game??
I'd be scared of fighting British troops too, if I were you Ivan.
What a joke.
😂😂hes literally set to sign a mutual defense pact with iran next week...i understand being biased..but atp you'll loose credibility after these conflicts
Rammstein already happened. Keep dreaming.
What???
I would like to say What??? as well. Obviously there are to completely different wars waging concurrently with the nations with the same name that have vastly different current situations its the only rational explanation.
I didn't vote to go to war with Russia... why are we involved?
Same reason we were involved in 1939.
This is not the same as Iraq, Afghanistan, or any other post-war intervention, did you support those?
At this stage I can't see the need for UK forces involvement, but our materials and financial support should definitely continue.
If you don't know why we're involved with helping the Ukraine I doubt very much it'd be worth spending any time trying to explain to you how it works.
I prefer the Russian model thanks
You didn't vote at all, Ivan.
@@theincrement4898 voted for the Green Party actually pal.
Starmer is damp lettuce at the best of times, not going to happen.
I think starmer had training from poo tin on dictator tactics
Starmer is a damp squid
Give more package to ukrain put more tax on your peoples
Let's keep out of it. Supply weapons by all means but sending UK troops to help train Ukrainians is just mission creep.
Cowardly British
And if America said the same in World War 2 then we would be speaking German. Stand up against dictators and bullies. Have you no pride or self respect?
@@shuathe2nd Laughable. First of all the Americans only supplied materials through Lease Lend. It was the Japanese that brought America into the war, there was no mission creep and thirdly you know little about Brits, we don't learn a foreign language for anyone. Your comment is way off and has little bearing on my comment. Now, try again 🙂
Brilliant news. The gay troupe are coming. 😂😂😂😂
Really don't think so. You see you don't have what it takes anymore.
Sad but true.
❤❤❤Russia from the 🇬🇧.
You what mate ? 😂
@@Incognito-turnip you heard. The truth.
Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦
We'll see who has the last laugh when Nato gets involved & I can guarantee it's not going to be pretty for the Ruzzians
Another guest with a healthy amount of shares in the arms industry wanting to maximise his return.
Day dreaming
Ukraine has lost .Russia has won.Its just a matter of time.Wake up
💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️
The Childerens teaching us the complex matters🤣🤮 go get some sleep green boy🤣🤮
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
RESPECT ,
THE FFL IS ALREADY ABOARD, PILOTS WOULD BE THE LOGICAL STEP IF WE ARE SERIOUS IN OPERATING AN
AIR FORCE OF SUBSTANCE.🔱⭐🦨
Whatever Russians say with any enthusiasm you know the opposite is true...They are such a bizzare people 😂😂