Wonderful time lapse of the construction. Looks like a great facility for making it easier to look after your wonderful fleet of rolling stock by your brilliant people.
Great presentation using time-lapse photography. I'm getting old, and whilst I admire the initiative to prepare this, which helps protect the rolling stock, my first reaction was remorse seeing nice 'virgin territory' ripped up and built on. It got better as half of it wasn't used and 'became green' again, as the grass grew back - or was planted. Nice project and glad its reached completion for 2022. Al.
Thanks for commenting on the time lapse video. We are glad you enjoyed it. When we planned the scheme, we explored every possible site along the whole 18 miles of railway. We wanted something that was as unobtrusive as possible, was on land that we could acquire (because we have more or less no ‘spare’ land in our ownership) and was operationally in the right place. In the end we found the one available piece of land beside the short length of line at Pickering that is outside the National Park boundary. There simply is no brownfield land beside the railway. We worked closely with the local planning authority to minimise the impact of the building, whilst keeping it as large as possible. It’s not meant to be a lock-up garage, the partially open sides keep the rain off but allow ventilation and all the servicing facilities, pits, power etc are there to help the team do their job. The green area is designed to hold water when the valley floods, eliminating any increased flooding risk in Pickering town.
One of the bestbthings to be built on nymr now Gresley can be saved from elements love to support when I can superb railway hope uget thru this virus farce soon
Fantastic .... well done all ..... hope to see you all again in 2022 when i`m next up north for me holiday ..... ps make sure you`ve got plenty of those hot sausage rolls in the Grosmont buffet .... Mnmnm
Thanks for commenting on the time lapse video. We are glad you enjoyed it. When we planned the scheme, we explored every possible site along the whole 18 miles of railway. We wanted something that was as unobtrusive as possible, was on land that we could acquire (because we have more or less no ‘spare’ land in our ownership) and was operationally in the right place. In the end we found the one available piece of land beside the short length of line at Pickering that is outside the National Park boundary. There simply is no brownfield land beside the railway. We worked closely with the local planning authority to minimise the impact of the building, whilst keeping it as large as possible. It’s not meant to be a lock-up garage, the partially open sides keep the rain off but allow ventilation and all the servicing facilities, pits, power etc are there to help the team do their job. The green area is designed to hold water when the valley floods, eliminating any increased flooding risk in Pickering town.
Thanks for commenting on the time lapse video. We are glad you enjoyed it. When we planned the scheme, we explored every possible site along the whole 18 miles of railway. We wanted something that was as unobtrusive as possible, was on land that we could acquire (because we have more or less no ‘spare’ land in our ownership) and was operationally in the right place. In the end we found the one available piece of land beside the short length of line at Pickering that is outside the National Park boundary. There simply is no brownfield land beside the railway. We worked closely with the local planning authority to minimise the impact of the building, whilst keeping it as large as possible. It’s not meant to be a lock-up garage, the partially open sides keep the rain off but allow ventilation and all the servicing facilities, pits, power etc are there to help the team do their job. The green area is designed to hold water when the valley floods, eliminating any increased flooding risk in Pickering town.
Hello Nymr if you’re are wondering I live at the staition before Pickering not saying that location so people can’t easily track me down but it is me the Staition Master’s son
@@1chish The website mentions funding of the European agricultural fund for rural development. I am interested in the height of support that heritage line received from the EU that will in the future be obsolete.
@@theempirestrikesback2939 I guessed there was some ulterior reason. But you are wrong. The UK has replaced that EU agricultural funding with its own fund. Of course the money the EU 'gave' to the UK was money the UK had paid to the EU in the first place. I was always mystified why some people couldn't understand that simple fact. North Yorkshire Moors Railway was awarded £1.9million as part of the Government’s £1.57 billion Culture Recovery Fund to help the organisation survive the financial challenges caused by the Covid-19 crisis.
I believe it was a jar of French branded coffee, surplus to requirements when the EU moved its entire commision from Brussels to Strasbourg for 2 weeks, as it does once every year to appease the French.
HORSES FOR COURSES ???? So in Yorkshire they have horse STABLES for their horse drawn ? carriages !!!! I think they mean a "Carriage shed", the traditional railway term for a covered building for carriages !!!
Whilst I'm a supporter of the railway and understand the need for this facility I feel it's such a shame about the location. Pity it couldn't be built somewhere less obtrusive. It has changed the look of this part of the valley for the worse.
Thanks for commenting on the time lapse video. We are glad you enjoyed it. When we planned the scheme, we explored every possible site along the whole 18 miles of railway. We wanted something that was as unobtrusive as possible, was on land that we could acquire (because we have more or less no ‘spare’ land in our ownership) and was operationally in the right place. In the end we found the one available piece of land beside the short length of line at Pickering that is outside the National Park boundary. There simply is no brownfield land beside the railway. We worked closely with the local planning authority to minimise the impact of the building, whilst keeping it as large as possible. It’s not meant to be a lock-up garage, the partially open sides keep the rain off but allow ventilation and all the servicing facilities, pits, power etc are there to help the team do their job. The green area is designed to hold water when the valley floods, eliminating any increased flooding risk in Pickering town.
I couldn't believe that the NYM, part of the 'heritage' business as much as the National Trust, was allowed to rip up virgin land. What on earth happened to building regulations???
@@BenDover-ln6ns Democracy: doesn’t make it a good idea? Democracy: manipulated by well moneyed people who perpetuated lies to get a decision to suit their own interests? Democracy: you are allowed to change your mind based on new information?
Have you considered how modifications to non unique vehicles can improve the patron experience to enjoy a day out at the railway? As in the rest of life, one has to sometime compromise. Mods have to be considered very carefully in the context of the overall objective: preserving and operating heritage railway for members of the public to enjoy. Your approach would not only discriminate, be detrimental to a wide group of people but is plain daft. Would you also apply this logic to not fitting toilet retention tanks?
There's hundreds of MK1s left knocking around, really doesn't matter if a few are converted for wheelchair access. Better for everyone to experience it in my opinion.
@@jammiedodger7040 Restoring old vehicles to as built condition - what does this mean? In practice rolling stock went through modification throughout its operating life. Examples: pictures/ads in carriages, change of livery, replacement seat moquette, lights, carpet, handles, wheelsets, suspension components, bogies etc. They were adapted to do their job as their job changed throughout their lives and in preservation some lost features are restored, some are not and new ones added. Even vehicles in the NRM are not going to be exactly as they were built. Specialist restorations probably closest (Stately trains, LNER Beaver Tail) but these are for special and probably unique examples and more likely restored to a configuration supported by available evidence and materials to do so. Aside from the falsity of getting to as built condition, one has to weigh up the practicalities of such “purity” - the cost and effort of doing the restoration to that level vs. The benefits to the vehicle’s continued life and usefulness on an operating railway? Doing so for something really special - LNER Beaver Tail -> YES! But does it really matter that a MK1 is not absolutely as it was in 1951 in Derby? Does it destroy the illusion that is preservation? No. And for your particular gripe not having improvements for disability access is discriminatory and unhelpful to passengers/staff/the railway. Building new carriages - well if railways could afford it, maybe they would (Ffestiniog Welsh Highland), I’m sure Bombardier/CAF/Alstom would love it!
I never been on the North Yorkshire Moors Railway. But this looks incredible. Great work👍💚
Thank you Andrew
I built this, proud as punch, the best job ever
Wonderful time lapse of the construction. Looks like a great facility for making it easier to look after your wonderful fleet of rolling stock by your brilliant people.
Great presentation using time-lapse photography.
I'm getting old, and whilst I admire the initiative to prepare this, which helps protect the rolling stock, my first reaction was remorse seeing nice 'virgin territory' ripped up and built on.
It got better as half of it wasn't used and 'became green' again, as the grass grew back - or was planted.
Nice project and glad its reached completion for 2022.
Al.
Thanks for commenting on the time lapse video. We are glad you enjoyed it. When we planned the scheme, we explored every possible site along the whole 18 miles of railway. We wanted something that was as unobtrusive as possible, was on land that we could acquire (because we have more or less no ‘spare’ land in our ownership) and was operationally in the right place. In the end we found the one available piece of land beside the short length of line at Pickering that is outside the National Park boundary. There simply is no brownfield land beside the railway. We worked closely with the local planning authority to minimise the impact of the building, whilst keeping it as large as possible. It’s not meant to be a lock-up garage, the partially open sides keep the rain off but allow ventilation and all the servicing facilities, pits, power etc are there to help the team do their job. The green area is designed to hold water when the valley floods, eliminating any increased flooding risk in Pickering town.
Great video- Yorkshiremen don't screw around!
We are going to Yorkshire for a holiday in May, we hope to visit the NYMR while there, can't wait . Love the video.
Congrats on the build being completed, looks amazing and I can’t wait to be back up there in the new year to see it
That’s one amazing building. Well done, good luck to you all. Happy New Year, let’s hope it’s going to be. Fingers crossed. Mick.🇬🇧
Amazing and congrats on having such deep pockets for this great cause!
Fantastic 👍🇬🇧
I was on one of the trains while it was being built
Great News , looking good.
Amazing it's absolutely massive at least all of you carrages wont be stored outside
fantastic!!!!
1:49 TORNADO YAYA must have been at the annual steam gala i went to
One of the bestbthings to be built on nymr now Gresley can be saved from elements love to support when I can superb railway hope uget thru this virus farce soon
Nice time lapse!
Thanks!
Congrats guys - brilliant stuff
Awesome time lapse, Happy New year to you all.
wow, looks excellent. will make the engineers life's easier. Merry Christmas to you all
fantastic
Will there be a path to the public can veiw it like at grosmont?
Hope so
Blimey it is massive
Aye, heritage railways in the UK are getting quite good at these big projects.
@@Pesmog indeed, the heritage railways have better infrastructure than the proper lines
Fantastic .... well done all ..... hope to see you all again in 2022 when i`m next up north for me holiday ..... ps make sure you`ve got plenty of those hot sausage rolls in the Grosmont buffet .... Mnmnm
I was just wondering why it's not fully enclosed or at least at the sides. Not exactly full protection from the elements ??
Thanks for commenting on the time lapse video. We are glad you enjoyed it. When we planned the scheme, we explored every possible site along the whole 18 miles of railway. We wanted something that was as unobtrusive as possible, was on land that we could acquire (because we have more or less no ‘spare’ land in our ownership) and was operationally in the right place. In the end we found the one available piece of land beside the short length of line at Pickering that is outside the National Park boundary. There simply is no brownfield land beside the railway. We worked closely with the local planning authority to minimise the impact of the building, whilst keeping it as large as possible. It’s not meant to be a lock-up garage, the partially open sides keep the rain off but allow ventilation and all the servicing facilities, pits, power etc are there to help the team do their job. The green area is designed to hold water when the valley floods, eliminating any increased flooding risk in Pickering town.
Apparently it rains there!
Why did it have to be a green field site ?
location location location
Thanks for commenting on the time lapse video. We are glad you enjoyed it. When we planned the scheme, we explored every possible site along the whole 18 miles of railway. We wanted something that was as unobtrusive as possible, was on land that we could acquire (because we have more or less no ‘spare’ land in our ownership) and was operationally in the right place. In the end we found the one available piece of land beside the short length of line at Pickering that is outside the National Park boundary. There simply is no brownfield land beside the railway. We worked closely with the local planning authority to minimise the impact of the building, whilst keeping it as large as possible. It’s not meant to be a lock-up garage, the partially open sides keep the rain off but allow ventilation and all the servicing facilities, pits, power etc are there to help the team do their job. The green area is designed to hold water when the valley floods, eliminating any increased flooding risk in Pickering town.
Hello Nymr if you’re are wondering I live at the staition before Pickering not saying that location so people can’t easily track me down but it is me the Staition Master’s son
Wow….fantastic
Which amount was EU funded?
I believe some of it was along with the National Lottery but why do you ask?
@@1chish The website mentions funding of the European agricultural fund for rural development. I am interested in the height of support that heritage line received from the EU that will in the future be obsolete.
@@theempirestrikesback2939 I guessed there was some ulterior reason. But you are wrong. The UK has replaced that EU agricultural funding with its own fund.
Of course the money the EU 'gave' to the UK was money the UK had paid to the EU in the first place. I was always mystified why some people couldn't understand that simple fact.
North Yorkshire Moors Railway was awarded £1.9million as part of the Government’s £1.57 billion Culture Recovery Fund to help the organisation survive the financial challenges caused by the Covid-19 crisis.
I believe it was a jar of French branded coffee, surplus to requirements when the EU moved its entire commision from Brussels to Strasbourg for 2 weeks, as it does once every year to appease the French.
@@darren25061965 Are there a lot of Brexiteers on the NYMR spreading such senseless alternative facts ?
Good to see EU benefits made clear👍
Made possible with EU funding.
HORSES FOR COURSES ????
So in Yorkshire they have horse STABLES for their horse drawn ? carriages !!!!
I think they mean a "Carriage shed", the traditional railway term for a covered building for carriages !!!
yet they can't even keep their small section of the Mill race clear, leaving other properties at the risk of being flooded...
....sour grapes.
Whilst I'm a supporter of the railway and understand the need for this facility I feel it's such a shame about the location. Pity it couldn't be built somewhere less obtrusive. It has changed the look of this part of the valley for the worse.
Your house probably makes that part of the country look worse than before it was built.
Thanks for commenting on the time lapse video. We are glad you enjoyed it. When we planned the scheme, we explored every possible site along the whole 18 miles of railway. We wanted something that was as unobtrusive as possible, was on land that we could acquire (because we have more or less no ‘spare’ land in our ownership) and was operationally in the right place. In the end we found the one available piece of land beside the short length of line at Pickering that is outside the National Park boundary. There simply is no brownfield land beside the railway. We worked closely with the local planning authority to minimise the impact of the building, whilst keeping it as large as possible. It’s not meant to be a lock-up garage, the partially open sides keep the rain off but allow ventilation and all the servicing facilities, pits, power etc are there to help the team do their job. The green area is designed to hold water when the valley floods, eliminating any increased flooding risk in Pickering town.
@@NYMR You did a very good job, well done.
I couldn't believe that the NYM, part of the 'heritage' business as much as the National Trust, was allowed to rip up virgin land. What on earth happened to building regulations???
Proudly financed by the EU (45%). And now happy Brexit.
We voted to leave. Get over it.
@@BenDover-ln6ns Which doesn't look like was a good idea...
@@xylicable democracy
@@BenDover-ln6ns Democracy: doesn’t make it a good idea? Democracy: manipulated by well moneyed people who perpetuated lies to get a decision to suit their own interests? Democracy: you are allowed to change your mind based on new information?
...as Britain was a net giver to the EU this was effectively part financed by the British people, not the undemocratic dictators in Brussels.
They should not modify coaches if they need a disabled coach use a new coach
Have you considered how modifications to non unique vehicles can improve the patron experience to enjoy a day out at the railway? As in the rest of life, one has to sometime compromise. Mods have to be considered very carefully in the context of the overall objective: preserving and operating heritage railway for members of the public to enjoy. Your approach would not only discriminate, be detrimental to a wide group of people but is plain daft. Would you also apply this logic to not fitting toilet retention tanks?
@@xylicable The coaches should be kept in the original state the same as how they were built and just build new replica coaches
There's hundreds of MK1s left knocking around, really doesn't matter if a few are converted for wheelchair access. Better for everyone to experience it in my opinion.
@@jammiedodger7040 Restoring old vehicles to as built condition - what does this mean? In practice rolling stock went through modification throughout its operating life. Examples: pictures/ads in carriages, change of livery, replacement seat moquette, lights, carpet, handles, wheelsets, suspension components, bogies etc.
They were adapted to do their job as their job changed throughout their lives and in preservation some lost features are restored, some are not and new ones added. Even vehicles in the NRM are not going to be exactly as they were built. Specialist restorations probably closest (Stately trains, LNER Beaver Tail) but these are for special and probably unique examples and more likely restored to a configuration supported by available evidence and materials to do so.
Aside from the falsity of getting to as built condition, one has to weigh up the practicalities of such “purity” - the cost and effort of doing the restoration to that level vs. The benefits to the vehicle’s continued life and usefulness on an operating railway? Doing so for something really special - LNER Beaver Tail -> YES! But does it really matter that a MK1 is not absolutely as it was in 1951 in Derby? Does it destroy the illusion that is preservation? No. And for your particular gripe not having improvements for disability access is discriminatory and unhelpful to passengers/staff/the railway.
Building new carriages - well if railways could afford it, maybe they would (Ffestiniog Welsh Highland), I’m sure Bombardier/CAF/Alstom would love it!