CRYING OVER THE DISCRIMINATION! | Extraordinary Attorney Woo Episode 3 Kdrama reaction (이상한 변호사 우영우)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ธ.ค. 2024
- 10/10 episode for sure
Patreon: / thecornerverse
Twitter: / thecornerverse
Paypal: paypal.me/thecornerverse
Business email: thecornerverse@gmail.com
SYNOPSIS:
Brilliant attorney Woo Young-woo tackles challenges in the courtroom and beyond as a newbie at a top law firm and a woman on the autism spectrum. A Tragedy surrounding two brothers forces a family to face a difficult truth. Young-Woo attempts to bridge a communication gap with a client.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
#ExtraordinaryAttorneyWoo #이상한 변호사 우영우
![When you take care of your daughter all day but she likes mommy more than you [Part 1] | K-DOC](/img/n.gif)
Speaking of Att Jung's awareness & growth as an advocate & ally for Woo, did you notice how after the trial when the jerk senior attorney who took over the case was pointing to Woo to say "Is she the...?" Jung immediately took his pointing finger like a handshake (bc it's rude to point at her & probably to avoid having rude things said about her in front of her.) I LOVE JUNG starting from episode 1 when he admitted he was wrong & apologized!
Pengsoo is the penguin character of Korean Education Broadcast. It is genderless and quite cute 😍 You can find its channel in YT.
I love your review about this show! Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Plus the cat behind you is so lovely💕
There are so many TH-camr reactions to this show. This series started with a .9% ratings share and in the last episode it posted a 15% ratings share. Each week the ratings for it have gotten higher. What a phenomenon.
In the Korean language the word for "dolphin" is literally "dol-whale". That's why she also sees/likes dolphins.
Well, not entirely; dolphins are cetaceans, like whales, in the same family. That's why she includes them in her obsession with whales.
When I cried, I cried too. The lines of this drama are really sad and there's something that hits the nail on the head.😭
The guy who is wearing glasses, Woo-young’s senior name is Jung Myeong-seok. 😀 Looking forward to your next review reactions!
The actor's name is Kang Ki-young.
I really love that you go deeper talking about what happened in the episode, because it's interesting to hear a different perspective from mine on some things, or things I didn't even think about
excited to hear your thoughts on certain future scenes, because I feel like I'm too biased sometimes lol
Well thought out review!!
I thought your pillow was moving by itself lol
I love watching your reactions so much! I found you through heartstopper but I'm so happy you are getting into the world of kdramas as there are so many brilliant ones out there. 💜 I recommend watching 'Crash Landing on You' which is my absolute favourite ☺️
It is not a lawyer's job, or even his obligation, to do everything for his client. He has a higher responsibility, and that is to the Court. A lawyer should not be presenting a case or part of a case he or she knows to be untrue, that would be a breach of professional ethics and could result in being disbarred.
It was not entirely irrelevant to the hearing that Young-woo is autistic, since the defendant is autistic too. They made the wrong objection. They should have objected that the prosecution had no permission to introduce that evidence into the hearing. Advocates can't just flail around saying anything they like; they have evidence, which is introduced by way of witnesses, and the witnesses usually have to have 'statement', or 'proof of evidence' documents, which sets out what they are going to say. Otherwise the defence doesn't know what the full basis of the prosecution is, and that gives the state an additional advantage over the defence, on top of the fact that the state is a massive entity with virtually unlimited resources and it's attempting to deprive a citizen of his or her freedom. So if he was going to say anything about whether autism means being unfit to stand trial, he'd have to introduce an expert witness and that expert witness would not be allowed to answer questions that are not directly related to the written report - which couldn't say anything about Young-woo because the expert hasn't met her, and of course any professional expert invited to comment on the autism of a person of whom haven't had any opportunity to carry out any examination, that expert would say 'I'm sorry it would be improper of me to answer that question'.
But it's a courtroom drama, so what's happening in the series is that everything has to be compressed. Cases like this would take months to come to court, Young-woo would be dealing with a dozen other cases and so would the other lawyers, and the trial would be several days long.
Jun Ho did volunteer work with handicapped people. (Nanuri) That's why his college friend thought he was doing the same with Woo. Jun Ho's back story remains to be explained.
This episode was my favorit too😢
Your cat is so cute❤️
디테일한 분석이 인상깊네요.
Good review ty!
He's name is kang ki young whom l like the most ❤ 🤍 💟 🧡
I knew it. The moment i saw the thumbnail, i could hear the british accent.
Is that a good or a bad thing? Hahaha
@@TheCornerverse You have distinctive british look. Thats all.
@@TheCornerverse I think it's a compliment. I could see you in Victorian or Edwardian dress. Even a Bronte character in a painting or film. Its a graceful beauty ;)
Im not simping on you haha. Just being honest.
I love these videos! One note on the legal side of things: I'm not sure that the judge was technically wrong to overrule this objection. In the US at least, you can insult opposing counsel. It's highly discouraged because it makes you look desperate and unprofessional, and obviously at a certain point, the judge could sanction you for contempt of court. But the prosecutor didn't strictly break a rule, and he was (very rudely) making an actual point that was relevant to the case. Defense claims the defendant is not responsible for his actions because of his autism; yet they are willing to employ someone with autism as a lawyer. Therefore, even the defense doesn't believe that autism per se makes people unable to control or be responsible for their actions. I'd guess he was being a huge asshole, because he was trying to provoke opposing counsel into saying something in passionate defense of autistic peoples' capabilities, which they would then have to contextualize for the jury. This is ultimately a losing line of argument, since autism is a spectrum, but its purpose is to force the defense to prove that the defendant himself is legally incompetent, rather than simply relying on his general autism diagnosis at face value to excuse him from culpability.
좋아요. goood! from Seoul Korea.
Peng Soo - Original song
th-cam.com/video/-gcSoJy2WiE/w-d-xo.html
You're eyes so beautiful 😍
One thing that bothers me about the show is the way they keep calling it "having autism" instead of being autistic, using the term Aspergers, and saying it's an illness... I'm still watching it with an open mind but I wish they'd refrain from implying that autism is an illness. And also that autism can be severe vs mild, when it's way too colourful to be labelled as anything but unique from person to person. Saying autism is a "severe illness" is wrong, and saying someone has a "Mental age of 4" or similar is just infantilizing them.
As a Korean, 'having autism' doesn't imply bad thing. I know it sounds bit eww when directly translated as "having", but it is not something like that.
@@user-bfsc6dfx2hd4 They say it's a disease, though, right? "I have autism disease" if you translate it directly. They should definitely change that. Being autistic is nothing bad, but saying it's a disease implies it is
I have an autistic child it is not a disease. but it is an illness for some people and my child was in therapy for 8 years just to learn to be able to deal with people. Your hung up on how it is phrased. As a parent i could care less, but i need you to understand my child functions differently. That is the message the show is trying to get out
Since when did the Koreans call it a disease though? I'm honestly curious. Pretty sure they also call it "autistic" / "autistic spectrum disorder" not "autism disease" in the language, as an intermediate learner myself. As for "Aspergers", my understanding is that this is an old concept that is now under the umbrella of autism. If the main character was narrating how autistic people were treated in the past, the usage of "Aspergers" would be historically accurate. "Mental age of 4" - I don't think this is offensive unless someone on the spectrum would enlighten me. It is describing the defendant's condition so that the attorneys could communicate with him accordingly. In this episode, there were lines that clearly described autism as a spectrum. The attorney herself clarified to her boss about the spectrum, telling him that it was wrong to assume she could connect with the defendant just because they were both autistic. Defendant's mom also confessed slight frustration and jealousy at how Yeong-woo is on the "high-functioning/genius" end of the spectrum while her son is at the other end.
@@samsbin korean is not meant to be translated literally to english. netflix translators tend to localize the dialogue often. for example, when youngwoo introduces herself as "kayak, deed, rotator.." etc she isn't actually saying any of those words in korean. she's saying "goose, tomato, swiss.." instead which all don't spell the same backwards and forwards, so the translators replaced those words with ones that make sense in english.
same with describing herself as having autism. i haven't heard youngwoo or her dad ever referring to herself as having an illness or disease (cmiiw), but the word 자폐 (ja-pye) comes from the chinese/hanja characters "self" and "closed", so the word is descriptive, and to say that one "has autism" simply means they have the characteristics of an autistic person. it makes sense in korean, but in english that nuance is kind of lost..