Sunni Ittehad Form Mehnga Parr Gaya | Justice Ayesha Justice Muneeb | Reserved Seats Case
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- As the Supreme Court on Tuesday resumed the hearing on the petition filed by the Sunni Ittehad Council against the denial of reserved seats for women and minorities in the national and provincial assemblies, Justice Ayesha A Malik remarked that the reserved seats cannot be allotted contrary to the principle of proportional representation.
A full-court bench, headed by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa, is conducting the proceedings.
Other judges on the bench are Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Muneeb Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Ayesha A. Malik, Justice Athar Minallah, Justice Syed Hassan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Shahid Waheed, Justice Irfan Saadat Khan and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan.
During the proceedings, Justice Ayesha Malik commented that allocating reserved seats against the principle of proportional representation was not permissible. She also questioned the advantages other parties would gain if the SIC lost this case.
Justice Minallah interjected at one point, emphasising the importance of women and minorities having representation in Parliament. He noted that the PML-N and PPP faced similar issues in the past without support from the Supreme Court.
"This mirrors the situation from 2018 where one party is the aggrieved party. The court has not learned from past instances," Justice Minallah added.
The judge predicted that there would inevitably come a time in the future when the apex court would regret its decision once again.
PREVIOUS HEARING
On previous hearing on Jan 24 [Monday], CJP Qazi Faez Isa referred to the PTI’s merger with the SIC a political “suicide”.
Following the Feb 8 general elections, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, which had been stripped of its electoral symbol ‘bat’, had directed the independent candidates who won election with its backing to join the Sunni Ittehad Council under a merger.
The chief justice asked the lawyer that the court would not hear any excuse painting the Election Commission as an abuser of the PTI.
“We are here to listen to what is in accordance with the constitution and law. You are the lawyer of the Sunni Ittehad Council, and not of the PTI. Your arguments in favour of the PTI come in conflict of interest,” added Justice Isa.
BACKGROUND
In March, the ECP ruled that the SIC was not entitled to claim quota for reserved seats “due to having non-curable legal defects and violation of a mandatory provision of submission of party list for reserved seats”.
Later, the ECP accepted applications of the opposing parties and decided that the seats in the National Assembly and provincial assemblies would not remain vacant and would be allocated by a proportional representation process on the basis of seats won by political parties.
The development resulted in the PTI-backed SIC losing a total of 77 reserved seats - 23 National Assembly seats (20 women and 3 minorities), 25 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly seats (21 women and 4 minorities), two Sindh Assembly seats (women) and 27 Punjab Assembly seats (24 women and 3 minority).
The PTI dismissed the ECP verdict as unconstitutional.
The SIC then challenged the ECP ruling in the Peshawar High Court, but its plea was dismissed.
In May, a three-judge bench of the apex court took up a petition filed by the SIC. The court suspended the ECP decision to allocate SIC's reserved seats to other parties.
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, during the proceedings, remarked that the mandate given by the people should be properly represented in parliament.
The court sent the matter of reserved seats to the Judges Committee to decide whether the case would be heard by the same bench or a larger bench would be constituted.
The court also ordered the ECP to suspended victory notifications of 77 lawmakers [on reserved seats], causing the ruling coalition to lose its two-thirds majority in the National Assembly.
In late May, a full court was constituted to hear the case.
#sunniittehad #supremecourt #ecp #pti #imrankhan
Welcome to the official channel of Dunya News. Pakistan’s Top News Network delivering the latest from around the globe.
Home to some of the most popular Talk Shows and Journalists such as Hasb e Haal, Mazaaq Raat, Dunya Kamran Khan Kay Sath, On The Front With Kamran Shahid, Think Tank, Ikhtalafi Note and, more.
Join our News Alert Group for the Latest Updates: WhatsApp Group Link
Dunya News Live Stream
dunyanews.tv/live
Follow Our Facebook Page: / dunyanews
Follow our Twitter Page: / dunyanews
الیکشن کمیشن نے جس طرح وطن عزیز کی اینٹ سے اینٹ بجا دی ہے اس کو آرٹیکل 6 کے تحت پھانسی دے دینی چاہئے تاکہ انصاف کا بول بالا ہو ۔۔
Qazi totally fixed
Lawyer sb why you don't say EC refused to consider pti canidate
So pti elected members were confused by the EC Decision carrying father caous
Kash Chief sb root ko pakar lein
Allah imran khan k sath ha
Ye full Bench he? koe other judges question krta he to Qazi Sb jawab ni dene dete, kehte he age chlo aage chlo
لندن فلیٹس کی منی ٹریل اور ذرائع آمدن موجود نہ ہو تو کہاں کا انصاف۔
😢😮😢😮😢😮😢
MASHALLAH PAKISTAN KI QAOUMI ZUBAN URDU.
آپ اردو میں لکھیں۔
سرکاری زبان انگریزی ہے۔ قانون کی تعلیم بھی انگریزی میں ہے۔
I am a supreme court lawyer myself but I haven't seen such an annoying and irritating lawyer in my professional career.
Qazi never let talking one sentence to Pti lawyers how he is arguing that much and qazi is quite
Bayiman qazi
C,j p. Great man
Patwari
Umeedwar requist kar raha haykaghzat e Namzadgi durust qarar dia tha to ab kion Qazi bal ki khal utar raha hay
Look at judge Isa trying to find out Fault in the form!
Everyone knows Qazi and Asim have already written the decision for this case, both want extensions and that's only possible if form 47 government gets majority in parliament.
Qazi bs apni extension ka sochta rha ha ecp ky argument ky doran
Angiraiz ki zuban bolna mushkil horaha hay to Qomi zuban or Quran pak ko ayeen banav
تمہارے انتخابات ہی سوالیہ نشان ہے
پہلے 45 اور 47 کے معاملہ درست کریں
متعلقہ امیدوار ( صاحبزادہ حامد رضا صاحب) کو بلا یر کیوں نہیں سماعت کر لیتے اور ان سے ان سوالات کی وضاحت طلب کی جاثی ؟ آخر ان کا موقف بھی تو سنا جائے ؟؟
Qazi Easy Paisa k hoty huye pti ka Kuch nah hoga😢😢
اس وکیل کی فیس کون دے رہا ہے
justice muneeb nay tu dho dho k mara hai in last to the lawyer
Sab fraud hai
Ya Adalat hi gulam ha kia justice kara gi
Why PTI is not getting propotional reserve seats while its members fought the election on uncommon
symbols while PTI is listed party?
Meharbani kar ke supreme court ki live transition Urdu mn karein.
قاضی صاحب زندہ باد
انگلینڈ میں جائیداد ایسے ہی تو نہیں بن گئی۔ حدیبیہ کا کیس اڑا دیا۔
@@shahidnasir7851
قاضی صاحب زندہ باد
Election commission dont have guts
faiz issa is the culprit of this crime. whole country is suffering for this.
Umeedwar requist kar raha haykaghzat e Namzadgi durust qarar dia tha to ab kion Qazi bal ki khal utar raha hay
Faiz pesa ko tu is bench ka Head nhi hona chahiye
جناب عالی ججز صاحبان ہم سے پہلے بھت ساری قومیں اپنی کہانیاں چھوڑ کر واپس لوٹ چکی ہیں آپ لوگ یاد رکھنا اعدلو ہی اقرب للتقوی ّو تقو اللہ ّان اللہ بما تعملون خبیر۔ سورة الماٸدہ۔نگہبان تمہیں دیکھ رھے ھیں❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Agar y judges jis din y samaj gaya to adalat p koi unglu nahi uthaya g
Justice muneeb Akhtar
❤
It’s Brilliant to watch while hearing session on media
Ek aadami Satara jaj se Mukabala kar raha hai Allah Tala isko Kamyab Karega Inshallah Sab Bole Inshallah Allah Tala is dimag Wale aadami Ko Kamyab kare
People who lie will always confused
نہیں دیکھیں تو آئے کیوں؟
At first, ECP ka gale , article 6 laga do. Than CJP ko dekho... 24 crore awam ka zindegi ko, khelona bana liya in do log. RO Rawal pindi in ka against succha bol liya, iye ab proved ho gyi.
WHY QAZI CHIEF SEATING IN THIS COURT BENCH. HE IS GOING TO BE BIG BENEFICIARIES. 3 YEAR EXTENSION!
Sab bakvas😂
GREAT. JUSTIS. ATTHAR. MUNEEB. AYESHA. PERFECT. INSAF
Good justis sub