Rabbi Singer, I am beyond grateful that you have dedicated your life to helping us recover from idolatry. Without a doubt you speak truth & I want to convert. Your videos have been washing my mind clean & they are even helping my mother to understand too that the messianic mindset is so full of misconceptions, we are so grateful. We love you & adore you, may ha’Kadosh Baracha continue to Baruk you with His immense Hakmah! ❤️❤️💜💜❤️❤️
I would absolutely be dead already without modern dentistry alone. And I am afraid of the dentist. It’s amazing what you will subject yourself to in order to not die.
The jesus pagan parallels are *MINDBLOWING.* Same stories *Eucharist, Passion, Resurrection, Virgin birth...* *ALL PAGAN FILTH RETELLINGS* Same rituals Same *EVERYTHING.* *_CRAZY STUFF_*
Christians misunderstand the Resurrection which is based NOT on a empty tomb but on the testimonies od witnesses who claimed to have encountered the risen Jesus
The Gospel of Caesar Augustus, & What It Tells Us About the *_Gospel of the greco roman gaybag._* “Gospel” is the English translation of the Greek word “euangelion” which means “news that brings great joy.” When we hear this word today, our minds immediately tend to associate it with spirituality in general, or _*X*_tianity in particular, but originally, this word was political in nature. In the Greco-Roman world, from the time of Alexander the Great and on into the Roman Empire, this word was used to refer to history-making, world-shaping reports of political, *MILITARY* , or societal victories.
Example 1: The Battle of Marathon The setting of that first marathon was a battle in 490 B.C. when Greece was invaded by Persia. Despite all odds, Greece managed to defeat Persia, and after the battle, Greece sent heralds to take the euangelion (proclamation of good news of *MILITARY* victory) out into every town and village in the country, to tell the people what had happened, and declare to them that they were free! Those heralds were “evangelists”.
The Gospel of Caesar Augustus An inscription found in Priene, in modern-day Turkey, referring to Caesar Augustus says: “the birthday of [Augustus] has been for the whole world the beginning of the gospel (euangelion) concerning him.” (Priene 150.40-41) This inscription is found on a government building dating from 6 B.C. Here is more of what it says, which gives us insight into how they understood the “gospel” concerning Caesar Augustus: The most divine Caesar . . . we should consider equal to the Beginning of all things . . . for when everything was falling (into disorder) and tending toward dissolution, he restored it once more and gave the whole world a new aura; Caesar . . . the common good Fortune of all . . . The beginning of life and vitality . . . All the cities unanimously adopt the birthday of the divine Caesar as the new beginning of the year . . . Whereas the Providence which has regulated our whole existence . . . has brought our life to the climax of perfection in giving to us (the emperor) Augustus . . .who being sent to us and our descendents as Savior, has put an end to war and has set all things in order; and (whereas,) having become (god) manifest /PHANEIS/, Caesar has fulfilled all the hopes of earlier times. The “gospel” of Caesar Augustus was what we call today the Pax Romana, the age of peace in the Roman Empire which came about during this time, into which the *_gaybag_* was supposedly born. Caesar Augustus in this inscription is declared to be: divine, savior, and the beginning of the good news for all people on Earth of his *MILITARY* victories.
Mass-produced *EVANGELION (good news of military victory, pure filth)* written for mass distribution throughout the empire... Mark is consensus dated to 70 CE - 73 CE (Roman War Propaganda) It is usually dated through the eschatological discourse in Mark 13, which scholars interpret as pointing to the First Jewish-Roman War (66-74 CE)-a war that led to the destruction of the Second Temple in CE 70.
0:04 I met three women who said they met Elvis Presley in a spaceship. Then it must be true. Some minor comments that do not detract from the main reasoning of rabbi Tovia. 1. We have no real way to "know" when exactly the Gospels were written just. Accepting the Documentary Hypothesis for the New Testament also forces you the accept the Graf - Wellhausen Hypothesis about the Torah which uses the same method. 2. The ancient people, especially in the Hellenized and Roman sphere, had better hygiene than what rabbi Tovia presents in the video. Nevertheless, this is not to refute the main claim of the rabbi about the incredulous narrative of the empty tomb as proof for Jesus' divinity (btw - Jesus' followers could have just taken his body while the guards slept, or maybe they bribed them, Jesus didn't have many followers according to Philo and Josephus who barely, if at all, mention him, so the Romans didn't really care. The myth may have started with this, or as rabbi Tovia says, may be a later fantasy just like the stories about Shabtai Tzvi, Elvis or the Lubavicher).
Hi. I like your post & just want to make some side comments. European Christians were filthy. The black plague spread fastest among Christian Europeans because it was carried by fleas. If you kept the fleas down it wasn't transmitted as much. They had the added problem that it was common for families to take their farm animals indoors for the winter, & the people would live in a loft while the animals lived on the ground floor, which was often ground covered with straw to catch animal poo. The straw was a great breeding ground for rats & mice, & therefore, fleas. Some of the pre-Christian cultures believed in bathing. Jews, despite the dryness of the middle east, had laws to wash your hands before eating, & when you wake up in the morning, & to do mikvah baths at required times. Jewish dietary laws require that you remove insects from food. Christian Europeans saw the Jewish community & the Druid community (the religion called Wicca by practitioners) didn't die in such high numbers, so they blamed Jews & "witches" for causing the plague. FWIW those lovely, high lace collars Queen Elizabeth wore were to catch the lice that fell from their hair so the lice wouldn't get into the rest of their clothes. The regions where Roman & Greek cultures formed had lots more rain than the mideast, & lots more rivers & streams than the water available in Israel. Pretty smart of G-d to require bathing in a region where water was scarce.
@@brynawaldman5790 Yes, He also commanded hand-washing and going outside the camp and digging a hole to go #2. About the Europeans, they did have baths for different conditions; I will give them that. Nuns treated patients with herbs and oils, too. ✡️❤️
No historian mentions Jesus Apostles miracles from any historical record from that era outside of the Christian bibles. Pliny the elder makes no mention of Jesus and was the main Roman historian from that era. Josephus and Tactius were born and wrote decades later after Jesus died. No historian mentions Jesus coming back to life raising dead healing blind walking on water etc etc. One must pause......
You are quite correct. Nobody mentioned Herod murdering all the infants and toddlers in Bethlehem, either. Bethlehem is a suburb of Jerusalem. Nobody mentioned the alleged resurrection of huge numbers of dead people who rose when J-dude rose. One must wonder why nobody remarked upon these remarkable events. 😮
The Clementine Literature are chock full of all of the miracles the Nazarene Apostles Peter performed and the thousands God (through Peter) healed. They are a historical record.
Pliny wrote about the Mass. Why do you mention Pliny? If he didnt write any thing what would be the point of saying he didnt write about Jesus? You absolutely dont know what you are talking about. Ever heard of the Vatican Library? What about Polycarp and Justin Martyr they wrote about what you say does not exist.
Quite. Even Jesus-worshiping historians review the history of the church and see that about every 500 years, the church changes in significant ways. We are in the midst of such a change now. 😮
Paul never mentions a tomb in his authentic, undisputed letters. Paul did not believe in a reanimated corpse, but instead in a spiritual resurrection. “Flesh and blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of God.” (1 Corinthians 15:50)
Correction, Pharisees believed in the afterlife Saducees didn’t , did Pharisees get that idea of Greek Pagan religion? Didn’t Jesus say don’t touch me I have not yet returned to the father?
A historic Zealot Jewish Rebel leader was the one crucified inspiring that scene in the gospels.... Jeezer was partially modeled after him, just one of many characters the jesus is hinting at. That leader's name *Eleazar ben Simon.*
It is unknown how Eleazar ben Simon died. Days prior to the siege of Jerusalem, Eleazar ben Simon was betrayed by John of Gischala. According to Josephus, John sent a party to the Zealot stronghold in the Temple to offer a sacrifice before the coming festival of Passover. Yet when Eleazar and his Zealots opened the gates to permit entry, John's forces slaughtered the inhabitants of the temple while the Zealots tried to flee. Nothing is known of Eleazar's fate after this betrayal, except for the fact that Josephus mentioned him as still commanding the Zealots when they rejoined John in his fight against Simon bar Giora.
Two separate but very similar accounts of crucifixion scenes are found in the gospels and in josephus' Antiquities 18: Chapter 3 *Josephus bar Mathias = JOSEPH OF ARAMATHEA*
Maybe for Paul the tomb was empty just because Jesus´s body was transformed into a neumatic body and flied away? And therefore there was no need for the women or the disciples to discover the tomb, cause under that new shape Jesus could appear to them at any time and anywhere? It´s just an idea, I´m not an expert. Cool video. I enjoy your content. Greetings.
Some important notes for this wonderful clip- 1. Even if it is said that there was an empty tomb, this is of course not evidence that Jesus rose from the dead, even the gospels say that Roman soldiers said that women or disciples of Jesus came and took him out of his tomb, obviously the gospels write that it is because the Jews gave them money to lie, but that is the claim of the gospels and who He said that the truth was precisely with the Jews? Maybe they just got the tomb of Jesus wrong? The gospels themselves also say that the women came to his grave to take him out of the grave and anoint him with perfumes, of course there is no logic in this. Maybe there was some crazy woman who went there and took him out of his grave? 2. Although the Gospels say that Jesus appeared to his disciples in a physical form (as they saw him eat or touched him, etc.), but at first they themselves say that they saw a human being and did not think at all that it was Jesus, that is, he did not resemble Jesus at all, only later they "realized" that he was Jesus, the question is if it was Jesus who came out of his grave and walked the earth, how could it be that they did not recognize him? The gospels also say that Jesus "appeared" to them and then once again "disappeared" from them, meaning that it was not really his body, could it be that it was some - who disguised himself as Jesus and not really Jesus? The gospels also do not say that Jesus said to them "I am Jesus", it is also strange why he did not say this to them. From this evidence and more even if we admit that the tomb was empty and the disciples of Jesus met someone who "understood" that he was Jesus, it is impossible to really know if it is really true that Jesus rose from the dead, needless to say that Jesus was "prophesied" that he would rise after 3 days and 3 nights but even according to them he rose after 2 Nights and not 3 nights, Paul and the gospels also wrote that it is written in the Bible that this is how we will know who the Messiah is, although it is not written anywhere, you see they lied if so who knows what else they lied about.
The arguments that you are presenting to show that Paul and the gospel writers lied about the Resurrection is flawed. You assume that because Jesus appears to two of his disciples and then disappears in front of them somehow proves that Jesus never resurrected bodily despite the fact that the gospels affirm that he did rise bodily. You really need to broadened your understanding. If the gospels have in fact confirmed that he resurrected bodily then we don’t need to assume or believe that they lied about his bodily resurrection just because he was able to appear and disappear right in front of them. When Jesus was alive he was able to walk on water, think about that for a moment. You don’t need to be a ghost to walk on water. You just need to have the power of God with you. There are many examples from the New Testament of Jesus disappearing while he was still alive before the crucifixion. In John chapter 8 for example after Jesus said before Abraham was born I am. the crowd there wanted to stone him to death. But as the gospel of John says he slipped right out from them into the crowd. In other words he simply vanished into thin air while still alive. Even in the book of acts you have Nathaniel who spoke with the eunuch , it says that after the eunuch was baptized the spirit of God took Nathaniel away from the eunuchs sight and the eunuch never saw Nathaniel again. So broaden your mind Jesus always preformed great miracles. So appearing and disappearing in front of Jesus disciples would not be proof That the resurrection of Jesus in bodily form is false. It only proves that Jesus indeed did resurrect In bodily form and as some one who is alive again he is able to do the same things he did before he died which is preform miracles such as appearing and disappearing in bodily form not as a spirit.
@@AdaraBalabusta Generally speaking Israel were given 613 commandments that they have to keep while non Israelis (gentiles) should keep only seven Noahide laws !
Christianity can’t exist without Jesus resurrection. End of topic. Why do any rabbi will accept the resurrection of Jesus??? Why??? Beside being curious about Judaism what is the interest for Christians to listen to this man?
The tomb was empty, Rav Singer, bc Yeshua was never in there to begin with. Hashem would never have let Yeshua be crucified. That would be against Torah. Stop believing the Greeks and their Gospels. The Roman occupation and the greek exile were the same. The Greeks never left - they just changed uniforms. Hashem allows the evil one to exist as this helps propel free will. The true writer of the NT IS the Sa-tan. The true writer of the Quran IS the Sa-tan. The Sa-tan uses Christianity to engineer dissent, and it encourages the Jews to... 1) Leave Judaism 2) Embrace Christianity/ other religions 3) Fall away from the One G-d 4) Trash other Jews - including Yeshua Once this becomes apparent, everything is illuminated. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The reasons the Temples were destroyed were ... Lashon Hara against Hashem Lashon Hara against the Torah and His teachings. Lashon Hara against fellow Jews. Once one understands this, Christianity and the NT makes perfect sense. DO NOT speak Lashon Hara against any Jews - walking the earth or not - including Yeshua. If Jews were correct in their Lashon Hara against Yeshua, then Hashem would have ushered in the Redemption already. A Jew is fully capable of denying Christianity and all its teachings and trappings while simultaneously not destroying a fellow Jew's character. Good luck. G-d bless you, G-d bless Israel. Thank you for protecting the sanctity of the Sinai Covenant.
Mass-produced *EVANGELION (good news of military victory, pure filth)* written for mass distribution throughout the empire... Mark is consensus dated to 70 CE - 73 CE (Roman War Propaganda) It is usually dated through the eschatological discourse in Mark 13, which scholars interpret as pointing to the First Jewish-Roman War (66-74 CE)-a war that led to the destruction of the Second Temple in CE 70.
Just saying , why dont for example attack Islam or Hinduism ???You focus all all youre strength on Christianity is it wrong or ?? , not correct ??? I know WHY from the bible Nt AND OT !!! GOD Bless you , im not an enemy , but i have to constructively critizise you not the Biblios !!! Pro 18:17 The first to state his own case, seems right, Until another comes and examines him !!! Mat 28:11 Now when they were going, behold, some of the watch came into the city, and shewed unto the chief priests all the things that were done. Mat 28:12 And when they were assembled with the elders, and had taken counsel, they gave large money unto the soldiers, Mat 28:13 Saying, Say ye, His disciples came by night, and stole him away while we slept. Mat 28:14 And if this come to the governor's ears, we will persuade him, and secure you. Mat 28:15 So they took the money, and did as they were taught: and this saying is commonly reported among the Jews until this day.
@@just.a.dude.7 Call into the show and ask Rabbi questions regards Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Satanism, Mormonism, Paganism, Gnosticism.. etc etc as compared to Judaism if you're curious.
Actually, someone called in on today’s live show and asked about Islam. Hinduism does not send aggressive missionaries to Israel and to Jewish neighborhoods throughout the world; the idolatrous church does. Except for the parts stolen from Tanach, the nt is fictional.
Matthew is not the word of G-d so who cares? The focus is on Christianity because of the unrelenting attacks against Judaism by missionaries. If they quit trying to lead Jews into idolatry we wouldn't care what they believe. Matthew, and all the gospels, were written a minimum of 40 years after the death of Jesus. John is into the second century. The writers were anonymous, didn't know Jesus or any of the original disciples and couldn't read or write Hebrew. Christian missionaries use Greek texts to attack our religion. You better believe we will defend our faith to the last.
Good morning Rabbi ! I kindly request you to give me explanation on the following words of God no one can delete them or misinterpret them Psalm 71 verse 20 Daniel 12 verse 2 and 3 Hosea 6 verse 1 and 2 Isaiah 26 verse 19 Psalm 16 verse 8-11 Jonah 1 verse 17 Job 19 verse 25 -27 Yes according to the Holy Bible that I know the Birth the stay the death and finally the resurrection of Yeshua was foretold accurately. God Bless you Rabbi
Psalms 71:20 Are you suggesting that it references Jesus because it talks about raising up from the earth? You have to read the entire Psalm. It also talks about the Lord supporting the psalmist in his age in years. This is typical Christian exegesis pulling out a single line from a Psalm or text that in no way shape or form is Messianic. And by the way, if it was about Jesus, It wouldn't have been raised from the Earth would it? It would have been taken out of the cave... Daniel 12: 2-3 So because it references a resurrection it is about Jesus? Once again, no. This refers to the end of days when the righteous are raised to everlasting life but the unrighteous are also raised to be ashamed and disgraced before they are utterly destroyed. I mean this one's not even close... Hosea 6:1-2 He (G-d) shall revive us! If it was about Jesus who is the us? Christians like this one because it has reference to a third day revival. Notice it doesn't say resurrect. Those to be revived are not dead. Isaiah 26:19 There will be a resurrection when the true Messiah comes to power. Corpses!!!! Not corpse. Christians use Messianic references to the raising of the Dead to link to Jesus. Psalm 16 v 8-11 Yikes. Read the first sentence of Psalm 16. A michtam of David! David extolling G-d. Jonah 1:17 There is no v 17 in Jonah 1 in the Hebrew. It is in the Christian versions. In the belly of the fish for 3 days and 3 nights. A little typology right? Homework assignment. Pick a gospel account. Count the days and nights in the make believe tomb. Not adding up are they?
So a long dead friend of mine suddenly drives up to my house. What is the likely first reaction? Look at the car he came to visit me?? You don't have an argument here Rabbi.
I obviously don't agree. The reason why I'm here is the same reason why I'm also on atheist channels. I'm an ex-athiest. And no, concept of trinity is all over the Bible, even though the word itself doesn't occur.
@@Thoughtflux ok, ex atheist. Hope you learn something here. You can dig up lots of concepts in Tanach if you have an agenda to find a concept. There's the talking animal concept, there's a couple examples of that but no one's started a talking animal religion yet. There are so many explicit references to G_d being one and unambiguous declarations referring to G_d in the singular. Pity you have to rely on“3” angels here and “3” days there to claim a rock solid trinity doctrine which is really a flimsy and inadequate claim. Why don't you accept these explicit references to G_d just being one and there is no other? Rather you’re happy to swallow up the ambiguous and vague ones, which have no connection to G_d being 3 people. : /
@@paulc3307 It is true that the concept of a Triune God was not explicitly mentioned in the revelation to the ancient Israelites in the Torah. Even though you can see a complex Godhead in many places in the Torah (eg Daniel 7 13 and also 14). God has a covenant exclusively with the children of Abraham in the Torah. Nowhere does the Torah mention saving the gentiles. God makes a second covenant with gentiles in the new testament through the passover lamb of God - Jesus. Proving that God cares about all of humanity. Imo, Judaism & Christianity can coexist. Both are coherent and given the nature of the Bible, it is not possible for man to create it.
Okay so if they were in Paul letters you would believe it? No would likely not. Jesus had another body after he rose. He did have nail marks in his hands. However he could disappear in instant.
What is “they”? Your pronoun reference is a bit vague. In any case, the character Saul-Paul disqualified himself as a reliable witness because he bragged about deceiving people. Repent directly to G’d. Obey the seven laws given to all in Genesis.
How can you trust what Saul-Paul allegedly wrote/said when he bragged about deceiving people? Except for the parts stolen from Tanach, the nt is fictional. Repent.
In Corinthians chapter 2 verses 1-4 there is no mention of the resurrection of Jesus at all. Not even mentioned. In Romans chapter 8 it is only written that the Spirit of God raised Jesus from the dead, it is not written that it was in a bodily form, nor in Colossians is it spoken of the resurrection of Jesus.
1. Even if it is said that there was an empty tomb, this is of course not evidence that Jesus rose from the dead, even the gospels say that Roman soldiers said that women or disciples of Jesus came and took him out of his tomb, obviously the gospels write that it is because the Jews gave them money to lie, but that is the claim of the gospels and who He said that the truth was precisely with the Jews? Maybe they just got the tomb of Jesus wrong? The gospels themselves also say that the women came to his grave to take him out of the grave and anoint him with perfumes, of course there is no logic in this. Maybe there was some crazy woman who went there and took him out of his grave? 2. Although the Gospels say that Jesus appeared to his disciples in a physical form (as they saw him eat or touched him, etc.), but at first they themselves say that they saw a human being and did not think at all that it was Jesus, that is, he did not resemble Jesus at all, only later they "realized" that he was Jesus, the question is if it was Jesus who came out of his grave and walked the earth, how could it be that they did not recognize him? The gospels also say that Jesus "appeared" to them and then once again "disappeared" from them, meaning that it was not really his body, could it be that it was some - who disguised himself as Jesus and not really Jesus? The gospels also do not say that Jesus said to them "I am Jesus", it is also strange why he did not say this to them. From this evidence and more even if we admit that the tomb was empty and the disciples of Jesus met someone who "understood" that he was Jesus, it is impossible to really know if it is really true that Jesus rose from the dead, needless to say that Jesus was "prophesied" that he would rise after 3 days and 3 nights but even according to them he rose after 2 Nights and not 3 nights, Paul and the gospels also wrote that it is written in the Bible that this is how we will know who the Messiah is, although it is not written anywhere, you see they lied if so who knows what else they lied about.
OK, so if moses said to God, don't destroy your inheritance. Who is he referring to when talking to God is God a son, or is it more likely that his son is using God's name
You need to realize, research, and accept, that NOWHERE did God ever mention the "Yeshua/Jesus" character to us, NOWHERE did He tell us that we need to be "saved", and NOWHERE did He tell us that He requires HUMAN BLOOD (a purely pagan ritual that God ABHORS!!) as atonement for our sins. NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore, Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God! PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
Other than the nt, there exists no reliable contemporary reference to any of the stories in the nt. Nobody noticed the following: 1. The m*rder by the King of hundreds of infants and toddlers in Bethlehem, which is a suburb of Jerusalem; 2. The massive numbers of people who were allegedly resurrected simultaneously with J-dude; 3. That J-dude hung around Jerusalem for forty days after his alleged resurrection. Except for the parts stolen from Tanach to lend verisimilitude and the mention of a few historical figures, the nt is fictional. Repent of your sins directly to G’d, Who is neither a man nor a trio. Obey the seven laws given to all in Genesis 1-9.
Jeremiah 16: 19O LORD, my strength, and my stronghold, And my refuge, in the day of affliction, Unto Thee shall the nations come From the ends of the earth, and shall say: ‘Our fathers have inherited nought but lies, Vanity and things wherein there is no profit.’ 20Shall a man make unto himself gods, And they are no gods? 21Therefore, behold, I will cause them to know, This once will I cause them to know My hand and My might; And they shall know that My name is the LORD.
@@orlandonava9397: You need to realize, research, and accept, that NOWHERE did God ever mention the "Yeshua/Jesus" character to us, NOWHERE did He tell us that we need to be "saved", and NOWHERE did He tell us that He requires HUMAN BLOOD (a purely pagan ritual that God ABHORS!!) as atonement for our sins. NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore, Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God! PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
It doesn’t really matter as your idol likely never existed at all. Repent of idolatry and the rest of your sins directly to G’d, make amends to anyone to whom you have caused harm, and obey the seven laws given to all in Genesis.
"empty tomb", loaves and fishes, wine to water, etc. - false. pillar of fire leading millions of Jews in the desert for 40 years and providing all necessities of life - true. seems like the logical fallacy of special pleading.
@@AdaraBalabusta - the testimony of the events being "witnessed by millions" comes from the Torah. A document can't confirm itself. There is evidence of a Hebrew connection to ancient Egypt (Moses' name, for example) and the Torah can be read as a refutation of the culture and religion of Egypt and similar ancient empires (the late Rabbi Lord Sacks wrote extensively about this). But, one could just as well say that the events of the Iliad were witnessed by tens of thousands of Hellenic soldiers who ultimately returned to their homes. There even seems to be a city of Troy that was conquered and burned at the same time. But that doesn't prove that there was a near invincible warrior named Achilles who was the child of a goddess and that Greek gods such as Poseidon and Apollo took part in the battles. FWIW, I'm a Jew who tries to be observant, davens in Orthodox minyanim, sent his kids to yeshiva and has a daughter, son-in-law and grandsons in Israel. I believe that the Torah in the form we have it in shul was revealed to the Jews by God, the Creator of the universe, Redeemer of the Jews and Giver of a moral code for all mankind with particular obligations for the Jews. I just believe that can't be objectively "proved" by the text of the Torah in the same sense, for example, that the Declaration of Independence and American Revolution can be proved. For that reason, although his work is often interesting, I believe Rabbi Singer errs when he takes cheap and nasty shots at Christians (calling them idolators, as if they sacrifice infants and pray to Ba'al, or saying their beliefs are irrational (not much more irrational than ours, IMHO, but rationality, while important, isn't the only standard (ask Job) ... unless one is a Greek philosopher)) . With respect to relations with Christians, I prefer the work of Orthodox rabbis such as Pesach Wolicki, who focuses on common ground and fellowship with Christians. IMHO that is not just the right thing to do but, after 10.07, the prudent thing. Who else, in this world, will ally with the Jews?
@@marchess286 Every 500 years or so, historians have noted, the church undergoes significant change. Your implied threat against the Jewish people is part of what I have observed in the neo-church. The neo-church pretends friendship to Israel (the country and the people). However, underneath the facade, the neo-church has the same goal of the worst of the crusaders: worship our idol or else. I am well aware that a text cannot be used to prove the veracity of itself. That was my main critique of Strobel’s work. His arguments, further, relied upon circular reasoning. My point in mentioning that the events related in Exodus had been witnessed by millions was that the events in Exodus and other places in Tanach were national events, not private or small group events. The nt mentions several truly remarkable events about which nobody outside of the nt remarks. I doubt very seriously that Jesus ever existed. If Jesus did exist, I pity him. He was probably a Nazir whose followers deified him after his death. If Jesus did exist, he was an ordinary man, conceived in the usual way. He was not the messiah because, per the nt. Jesus taught contrary to the Torah on dozens of occasions, which the messiah would never do. Per the nt, Jesus sinned, but the text provides no evidence that he repented. The messiah might sin, being human; he would repent, though.
Articles of Possible Interest (titles, not links) Exodus Evidence: An Egyptologist Looks at Biblical History Abraham's Children in the Genome Era: Major Jewish Diaspora Populations Comprise Distinct Genetic Clusters with Shared Middle Eastern Ancestry
@@AdaraBalabusta - thank you for your two responses. My comments (to which you were responding) seem to have been deleted. I can only assume this was done by Rabbi Singer or his staff. I hope they put them back, but am not betting on it.
NOWHERE did God ever mention anyone named "Mohammed" to us, and NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore, the Quran absolutely did NOT come from God, and is a man-made work of fiction, though it's not pagan like Christianity is.
Christianity lacks common sense! The One True Creator G_d who created all of the Cosmos and everything in it doesn't need any middleman to forgive anyone of their sins! The One True Creator G_d has said this from the very beginning! Bereshit (Genesis) 4: 3Now it came to pass at the end of days, that Cain brought of the fruit of the soil an offering to the Lord. גוַיְהִ֖י מִקֵּ֣ץ יָמִ֑ים וַיָּבֵ֨א קַ֜יִן מִפְּרִ֧י הָֽאֲדָמָ֛ה מִנְחָ֖ה לַֽיהֹוָֽה: 4And Abel he too brought of the firstborn of his flocks and of their fattest, and the Lord turned to Abel and to his offering. דוְהֶ֨בֶל הֵבִ֥יא גַם־ה֛וּא מִבְּכֹר֥וֹת צֹאנ֖וֹ וּמֵֽחֶלְבֵהֶ֑ן וַיִּ֣שַׁע יְהֹוָ֔ה אֶל־הֶ֖בֶל וְאֶל־מִנְחָתֽוֹ: 5But to Cain and to his offering He did not turn, and it annoyed Cain exceedingly, and his countenance fell. הוְאֶל־קַ֥יִן וְאֶל־מִנְחָת֖וֹ לֹ֣א שָׁעָ֑ה וַיִּ֤חַר לְקַ֨יִן֙ מְאֹ֔ד וַיִּפְּל֖וּ פָּנָֽיו: 6And the Lord said to Cain, "Why are you annoyed, and why has your countenance fallen? ווַיֹּ֥אמֶר יְהֹוָ֖ה אֶל־קָ֑יִן לָ֚מָּה חָ֣רָה לָ֔ךְ וְלָ֖מָּה נָֽפְל֥וּ פָנֶֽיךָ: 7Is it not so that if you improve, it will be forgiven you? If you do not improve, however, at the entrance, sin is lying, and to you is its longing, but you can rule over it." זהֲל֤וֹא אִם־תֵּיטִיב֙ שְׂאֵ֔ת וְאִם֙ לֹ֣א תֵיטִ֔יב לַפֶּ֖תַח חַטָּ֣את רֹבֵ֑ץ וְאֵלֶ֨יךָ֙ תְּשׁ֣וּקָת֔וֹ וְאַתָּ֖ה תִּמְשָׁל־בּֽוֹ: *** See!!! No so-called "Jesus " is ever needed!!! Never has been!!! Never will be!!! The One True Creator G_d forbids 🚫 human sacrifice! It is an abomination!!! The One True Creator G_d specifically said in no uncertain terms that NO One can die for the sins of another! You and you alone are responsible for your own actions! Yechezkel (Ezekiel) 18: 20The soul that sins, it shall die; a son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, and a father shall not bear the iniquity of the son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself. כהַנֶּ֥פֶשׁ הַֽחֹטֵ֖את הִ֣יא תָמ֑וּת בֵּ֞ן לֹֽא־יִשָּׂ֣א | בַּֽעֲוֹ֣ן הָאָ֗ב וְאָב֙ לֹ֚א יִשָּׂא֙ בַּֽעֲוֹ֣ן הַבֵּ֔ן צִדְקַ֚ת הַצַּדִּיק֙ עָלָ֣יו תִּֽהְיֶ֔ה וְרִשְׁעַ֥ת הָֽרָשָׁ֖ע (כתיב רָשָׁ֖ע) עָלָ֥יו תִּֽהְיֶֽה: 21 And if the wicked man repent of all his sins that he has committed and keeps all My laws and executes justice and righteousness, he shall surely live, he shall not die. כאוְהָֽרָשָׁ֗ע כִּ֚י יָשׁוּב֙ מִכָּל־חַטֹּאתָיו֙ (כתיב חַטֹּאתָו֙) אֲשֶׁ֣ר עָשָׂ֔ה וְשָׁמַר֙ אֶת־כָּל־חֻקּוֹתַ֔י וְעָשָׂ֥ה מִשְׁפָּ֖ט וּצְדָקָ֑ה חָיֹ֥ה יִחְיֶ֖ה לֹ֥א יָמֽוּת: 22All his transgressions that he has committed shall not be remembered regarding him: through his righteousness that he has done he shall live. כבכָּל־פְּשָׁעָיו֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר עָשָׂ֔ה לֹ֥א יִזָּֽכְר֖וּ ל֑וֹ בְּצִדְקָת֥וֹ אֲשֶׁר־עָשָׂ֖ה יִֽחְיֶֽה: 23Do I desire the death of the wicked? says the Lord God. Is it not rather in his repenting of his ways that he may live? כגהֶֽחָפֹ֚ץ אֶחְפֹּץ֙ מ֣וֹת רָשָׁ֔ע נְאֻ֖ם אֲדֹנָ֣י יֱהֹוִ֑ה הֲל֛וֹא בְּשׁוּב֥וֹ מִדְּרָכָ֖יו (כתיב מִדְּרָכָ֖ו) וְחָיָֽה: *** See!!! Still No so-called "Jesus " is ever needed!!! Never has been!!! Never will be!!! The One True Creator G_d forbids 🚫 Adultery!!! But Christians want people to believe that G_d got another man's wife pregnant just like Zeus used to run around doing. Christianity is a lie! Christianity adopted way too many idolatrous and pagan beliefs contrary to what The One True Creator G_d actually said. We follow the instructions of the One True Creator G_d!!! Not the lies of Christianity.
You need to realize, research, and accept, that NOWHERE did God ever mention the "Yeshua/Jesus" character to us, NOWHERE did He tell us that we need to be "saved", and NOWHERE did He tell us that He requires HUMAN BLOOD (a purely pagan ritual that God ABHORS!!) as atonement for our sins. NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore, Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God! PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
Improve ??? Of Ourse God Can forgive , but “Improve” ??? This is a lengthy text and my Hebrew is not Yet perfect !!! But you seem to take a militant view to this but I understand: 2Co 3:13 And not as Moses, which put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished: 2Co 3:14 But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ. This is an unfinished answer because im rusty !!! But soon ill cetch up (pun intended !! But i bless You in Yeshuas Name because i believe we both believe in the Same Elohim !!! ❤
Amazing how you call Paul a liar in your other videos, but now you suddenly want to accept his lack of talking about the empty tomb! Paul himself says in 2 Corinthians 5 that believers should not be focused on Christ according to His earthly fleshly life, but His glorious spirit body seated at the right hand of The Father. Paul was instructed by the glorified Savior from heaven. Praying for your eyes to be opened to your true Messiah. Jesus died for your sins and defeated death for all humanity!
Paul very likely couldn't read or speak Hebrew. The claim that he was a student of Gamliel is laughable. He claims to be a Pharisee and can't read the language of Tanahk? By the way, he claims to be of the Tribe of Benjamin but elsewhere he claims to be a Herodian which makes him an Idumean. Acts has him a Roman citizen. Three separate claims of identify and none are compatible...
There is no deity but the G’d of Abraham. I will agree with that part of your statement because the Jews and the Muslims worship the same deity. I have read the Qu’Ran and cannot agree that Muhammad is a prophet.
Is there any precedence for someone being physically raised from the dead in the Tanach? What is the proof of their resurrection? Whether or not Jesus was physically raised from the dead and ascended to heaven I don't think really mattered to the Nazarene Jews. What did matter to them, was his life example (Torahly righteous living) and what he (as the expected Prophet "like unto Moses") taught. It's an interesting phenomenon that in all of the Nazarene Apostle Peter's Jewish teachings found in the Clementine Literature (and there is a lot) on the resurrection of the righteous (and the unrighteous) to their respective judgments, Peter does not speak as to the physical resurrection and ascension of Jesus, and Peter only mentions the crucifixion just one time, briefly. Peter doesn't mention the R and A of Jesus to his Jew and Gentile mixed audiences. Perhaps it was a known fact and so it didn't need mentioning. What was more important to the Nazarene Jewish Apostles, was the teachings of Jesus, that "if" followed, would ensure the righteous Gentiles a place in the resurrection into the future Messianic Kingdom. The Nazarene Apostles' disposition was that the Jews themselves had the Laws and teachings of Moses, which if followed faithfully, it would ensure them a place in the resurrection of the righteous Jews. Paulinism subverts that... To those 12 Nazarene Apostles at the time (and the thousands of Jews who witnessed the teachings and miracles of Jesus (as the 2nd Moses)), did they really need an "empty" tomb to solidify their belief in Jesus as the "True Prophet" and "once and future" Messiah....after all of the miracles they had witnessed?
In answer to your question, no, the Tanach does not tell of anyone being resurrected. I don’t care what any of the characters in the novel called the nt said or did. Except for the parts stolen from Tanach, the nt is fictional.
@@User-x5s3x Read what carefully? Give me a reference to read and I will read it carefully. Show me where it says "Joshua" is "that" Prophet....it doesn't exist. Joshua is not the Prophet "like unto Moses", if he were, Moses would have named him then and there, immediately. Moses did however hand his leadership authority over to Joshua...and Joshua was a prophet (no doubt), but he was not a prophet on the same scale "like unto" Moses....not close. Quick question: How many miracles are on the record performed by or are attributed to Moses? Next: How many are on record performed by or are attributed to Joshua? Next: How many miracles are on record performed by or are attributed to Jesus? These are easy to find....which of the two Joshua or Jesus, is on par with Moses, just by the sheer numbers and quality alone?
Jesus become Messiah only toward Messianic Jews therefore only One hundred and forty-four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel were sealed because Jewish religious leaders such as Tovia Singer much like Pharisees and Sadducees in the past who rejected Yeshua Ha Nazri Wu Melech Ha Yehudim. So when Yeshua Ha Nazri Wu Melech Ha Yehudim said to them, “Watch out! Guard yourselves against the hametz of the P’rushim and Tz’dukim,” The teaching of Tovia Singer much like the hametz of the P’rushim and Tz’dukim in the past. "Many are called, but few are chosen." Many Jewish people are called to be back establishing Country of Israel, but few are chosen to follow Yeshua Ha Nazri Wu Melech Ha Yehudim. (Tovia Singer believes in Tanakh and Talmud, but Christians believe in Tanakh and Gospel. So Be It, Let It Be.) Even those Moslem Scholars told that ALLAH (ٱللَّٰه) as The Moon God was one of 360 Arabian Idols at Kaabah before Muhammad SAW was born. Later, Muhammad SAW and his followers able to manage ALLAH (ٱللَّٰه) the Moon GOD becoming the Champion of the Arabian Idol Competition, but doesn't make ALLAH (ٱللَّٰه) to be the real GOD because ALLAH(ٱللَّٰه) is still merely Substance as Arabian Idol. If you know about GOD particle, doesn't make the substance is the true GOD. They just make a false claim because it is still merely a Substance as particle. If those false teachers unable to read יהוה properly, should Jewish people follow their lectures? Therefore Hidden agendas from the textbooks of western government actually are against pure logic as political correctness for example: Isa Al Masih is the same person of Jesus Christ, ALLAH (ٱللَّٰه) is the same of YHWH (יהוה) with intention of misleading religious people. Persons in the western government who arranged the hidden agendas could be atheists who don't understand TANAKH, GOSPEL and AL QUR'AN.
The 144,000 idea comes from Revelation and is a Rrrrippp Offfff from ZECHARIAH. The 1/3 rd will not be a FRACTION, but a THIRD ONE. You don't know what you're talking about even within Xhristian Doctrines. NO.
@@russrussel3947 Who Cares? It is their own teaching. Every Christians know that Jewish Tovia Singer much like Pharisees and Sadducees in the past who rejected Yeshua Ha Nazri Wu Melech Ha Yehudim. But by any mean, Paradise is the Kingdom of Yeshua Ha Nazri Wu Melech Ha Yehudim. So Be It, Let It Be.
@@yourbuddy6421: Learn the difference between "Pharisees" and "Saducees" before pontificating on subjects you know ZERO about!! You need to realize, research, and accept, that NOWHERE did God ever mention the "Yeshua/Jesus" character to us, NOWHERE did He tell us that we need to be "saved", and NOWHERE did He tell us that He requires HUMAN BLOOD (a purely pagan ritual that God ABHORS!!) as atonement for our sins. NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore, Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God! PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
@@User-x5s3x Exactly, The term of Son of GOD accepted by Gentiles who follow Pagan Teaching after the ascention therefore, Gentiles believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of Living GOD as Father who art in Heaven. It is beyond the believe system of Jewish such as Pharisees and Sadducees. Tovia Singer believes in Tanakh and Talmud, but Christians believe in Tanakh and Gospel. So Be It, Let It Be. When Jesus heard this, he was amazed and said to those following him, “Truly I tell you, I have not found anyone in Israel with such great faith. I say to you that many will come from the east and the west, and will take their places at the feast with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven. But the subjects of the kingdom (such as Tovia Singer?) will be thrown outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
@@yourbuddy6421 Per G’d, Israel (the Jewish people, collectively) is His son. See Exodus 4 v 22. Except for the parts stolen from Tanach, the nt is fictional.
Rabbi Singer, I am beyond grateful that you have dedicated your life to helping us recover from idolatry. Without a doubt you speak truth & I want to convert. Your videos have been washing my mind clean & they are even helping my mother to understand too that the messianic mindset is so full of misconceptions, we are so grateful. We love you & adore you, may ha’Kadosh Baracha continue to Baruk you with His immense Hakmah! ❤️❤️💜💜❤️❤️
Blessings on your journey ✨
@@sixtysixtyone Todah! 😊
Thanks!
Thank you!
Thank you Rabbi. I always learn something new with each video.
Todah Rabba!
Exactly, “What empty tomb?” In fact, "What tomb?"
I would absolutely be dead already without modern dentistry alone. And I am afraid of the dentist. It’s amazing what you will subject yourself to in order to not die.
Thank you Rabbi Singer!
Rabbi-Such a pleasure to listen to!
The “Empty Tomb” narrative is a Greco-Roman literary trope/motif to prove someone’s divinity such as Adonis and Eleusis, etc
The jesus pagan parallels are *MINDBLOWING.*
Same stories
*Eucharist, Passion, Resurrection, Virgin birth...*
*ALL PAGAN FILTH RETELLINGS*
Same rituals
Same *EVERYTHING.*
*_CRAZY STUFF_*
Love ❤️ your work Rabbi.
love your work. its not your fault I've seen this posted on many different times.
❤ thank you rabbi ❤ feels safer knowing your out there speaking up for us all bringing us together 🕎 🇮🇱
❤ Let's get biblical ❤
If modern medicine didn't exist, I might have died in 2005.
Bless יִשְׂרָאֵל and may God heal your Father Tovia ❤❤
Christians misunderstand the Resurrection which is based NOT on a empty tomb but on the testimonies od witnesses who claimed to have encountered the risen Jesus
🙏🎗💙🇮🇱🤍
Im pro-Israel ❤
The Gospel of Caesar Augustus, & What It Tells Us About the
*_Gospel of the greco roman gaybag._*
“Gospel” is the English translation of the Greek word “euangelion” which means “news that brings great joy.”
When we hear this word today, our minds immediately tend to associate it with spirituality in general, or _*X*_tianity in particular, but originally, this word was political in nature.
In the Greco-Roman world, from the time of Alexander the Great and on into the Roman Empire, this word was used to refer to history-making, world-shaping reports of political, *MILITARY* , or societal victories.
Example 1: The Battle of Marathon
The setting of that first marathon was a battle in 490 B.C. when Greece was invaded by Persia. Despite all odds, Greece managed to defeat Persia, and after the battle, Greece sent heralds to take the euangelion (proclamation of good news of *MILITARY* victory) out into every town and village in the country, to tell the people what had happened, and declare to them that they were free! Those heralds were “evangelists”.
The Gospel of Caesar Augustus
An inscription found in Priene, in modern-day Turkey, referring to Caesar Augustus says: “the birthday of [Augustus] has been for the whole world the beginning of the gospel (euangelion) concerning him.” (Priene 150.40-41)
This inscription is found on a government building dating from 6 B.C. Here is more of what it says, which gives us insight into how they understood the “gospel” concerning Caesar Augustus:
The most divine Caesar . . . we should consider equal to the Beginning of all things . . . for when everything was falling (into disorder) and tending toward dissolution, he restored it once more and gave the whole world a new aura; Caesar . . . the common good Fortune of all . . . The beginning of life and vitality . . . All the cities unanimously adopt the birthday of the divine Caesar as the new beginning of the year . . . Whereas the Providence which has regulated our whole existence . . . has brought our life to the climax of perfection in giving to us (the emperor) Augustus . . .who being sent to us and our descendents as Savior, has put an end to war and has set all things in order; and (whereas,) having become (god) manifest /PHANEIS/, Caesar has fulfilled all the hopes of earlier times.
The “gospel” of Caesar Augustus was what we call today the Pax Romana, the age of peace in the Roman Empire which came about during this time, into which the *_gaybag_* was supposedly born.
Caesar Augustus in this inscription is declared to be: divine, savior, and the beginning of the good news for all people on Earth of his *MILITARY* victories.
Mass-produced *EVANGELION (good news of military victory, pure filth)* written for mass distribution throughout the empire...
Mark is consensus dated to 70 CE - 73 CE (Roman War Propaganda)
It is usually dated through the eschatological discourse in Mark 13, which scholars interpret as pointing to the First Jewish-Roman War (66-74 CE)-a war that led to the destruction of the Second Temple in CE 70.
@@bubbagumpy978 there were no Jews prior to Abraham.
He was the first HEBREW.
@@bubbagumpy978 flood accounts from various nations reinforce the Hebraic account.
❤
0:04 I met three women who said they met Elvis Presley in a spaceship.
Then it must be true.
Some minor comments that do not detract from the main reasoning of rabbi Tovia.
1. We have no real way to "know" when exactly the Gospels were written just. Accepting the Documentary Hypothesis for the New Testament also forces you the accept the Graf - Wellhausen Hypothesis about the Torah which uses the same method.
2. The ancient people, especially in the Hellenized and Roman sphere, had better hygiene than what rabbi Tovia presents in the video.
Nevertheless, this is not to refute the main claim of the rabbi about the incredulous narrative of the empty tomb as proof for Jesus' divinity (btw - Jesus' followers could have just taken his body while the guards slept, or maybe they bribed them, Jesus didn't have many followers according to Philo and Josephus who barely, if at all, mention him, so the Romans didn't really care. The myth may have started with this, or as rabbi Tovia says, may be a later fantasy just like the stories about Shabtai Tzvi, Elvis or the Lubavicher).
Hi. I like your post & just want to make some side comments.
European Christians were filthy. The black plague spread fastest among Christian Europeans because it was carried by fleas. If you kept the fleas down it wasn't transmitted as much. They had the added problem that it was common for families to take their farm animals indoors for the winter, & the people would live in a loft while the animals lived on the ground floor, which was often ground covered with straw to catch animal poo. The straw was a great breeding ground for rats & mice, & therefore, fleas.
Some of the pre-Christian cultures believed in bathing. Jews, despite the dryness of the middle east, had laws to wash your hands before eating, & when you wake up in the morning, & to do mikvah baths at required times. Jewish dietary laws require that you remove insects from food. Christian Europeans saw the Jewish community & the Druid community (the religion called Wicca by practitioners) didn't die in such high numbers, so they blamed Jews & "witches" for causing the plague. FWIW those lovely, high lace collars Queen Elizabeth wore were to catch the lice that fell from their hair so the lice wouldn't get into the rest of their clothes.
The regions where Roman & Greek cultures formed had lots more rain than the mideast, & lots more rivers & streams than the water available in Israel.
Pretty smart of G-d to require bathing in a region where water was scarce.
Name what stories are false about Lubavitch Rebbe?
@@Nudnik1That he still lives...
@@brynawaldman5790
Yes, He also commanded hand-washing and going outside the camp and digging a hole to go #2.
About the Europeans, they did have baths for different conditions; I will give them that. Nuns treated patients with herbs and oils, too. ✡️❤️
@@AdaraBalabustaYep. All generalizations are leaky barrels. Good for the nuns. I bet the warmer countries did bathes more often, & swam more.
I got to say, it falls into the Story of Lazarus,
Which originally was an Egyptian story.
If there was no empty tomb, if there was a body somewhere, how could the early assemblies of believers have survived?
No historian mentions Jesus Apostles miracles from any historical record from that era outside of the Christian bibles.
Pliny the elder makes no mention of Jesus and was the main Roman historian from that era.
Josephus and Tactius were born and wrote decades later after Jesus died.
No historian mentions Jesus coming back to life raising dead healing blind walking on water etc etc.
One must pause......
You are quite correct.
Nobody mentioned Herod murdering all the infants and toddlers in Bethlehem, either. Bethlehem is a suburb of Jerusalem.
Nobody mentioned the alleged resurrection of huge numbers of dead people who rose when J-dude rose.
One must wonder why nobody remarked upon these remarkable events. 😮
The Clementine Literature are chock full of all of the miracles the Nazarene Apostles Peter performed and the thousands God (through Peter) healed. They are a historical record.
@@thenazareneperspective2734 not from the era of Jesus . Written long after Jesus died.
Second third hand accounts .
@@thenazareneperspective2734 350ce......
Written centuries after
Pliny wrote about the Mass. Why do you mention Pliny? If he didnt write any thing what would be the point of saying he didnt write about Jesus? You absolutely dont know what you are talking about. Ever heard of the Vatican Library? What about Polycarp and Justin Martyr they wrote about what you say does not exist.
Christianity is quite obviously a narrative that has evolved over time.
Quite. Even Jesus-worshiping historians review the history of the church and see that about every 500 years, the church changes in significant ways. We are in the midst of such a change now. 😮
@@AdaraBalabusta the morphing edomite last beast monster in Daniel's visions.
Very clearly.
@@samfromisraelAgreed. I think of the church as the “little horn.”
@@AdaraBalabusta that's Titus Flavius...and yes, that is where the church truly begins,
@@AdaraBalabusta the big horn is Vespasian his father.
Paul never mentions a tomb in his authentic, undisputed letters. Paul did not believe in a reanimated corpse, but instead in a spiritual resurrection. “Flesh and blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of God.” (1 Corinthians 15:50)
Correction, Pharisees believed in the afterlife Saducees didn’t , did Pharisees get that idea of Greek Pagan religion? Didn’t Jesus say don’t touch me I have not yet returned to the father?
Not everyone died young in ancient times, Moshe rabayanu lived to 120, Avraham and Sarah did pretty well and Methusaleh oy vey,kol ha kavod 🎉
Oy vey 😂😂😂😂
1st :)
😊
The Herodians and Alexanders helped the Flavian Romans concoct allot of kakamamy stories, let's just leave it at that...
You know the answer, why ask?
For confirmation.
My question Rabbi, do you believe Yashua was crucified in the first place ?
A historic Zealot Jewish Rebel leader was the one crucified inspiring that scene in the gospels....
Jeezer was partially modeled after him, just one of many characters the jesus is hinting at.
That leader's name *Eleazar ben Simon.*
It is unknown how Eleazar ben Simon died. Days prior to the siege of Jerusalem, Eleazar ben Simon was betrayed by John of Gischala. According to Josephus, John sent a party to the Zealot stronghold in the Temple to offer a sacrifice before the coming festival of Passover. Yet when Eleazar and his Zealots opened the gates to permit entry, John's forces slaughtered the inhabitants of the temple while the Zealots tried to flee. Nothing is known of Eleazar's fate after this betrayal, except for the fact that Josephus mentioned him as still commanding the Zealots when they rejoined John in his fight against Simon bar Giora.
Notice he was betrayed by a fellow Jew, but then he reappears and makes a comeback.
12 disciples all have names of Macabees.
Two separate but very similar accounts of crucifixion scenes are found in the gospels and in josephus' Antiquities 18: Chapter 3
*Josephus bar Mathias = JOSEPH OF ARAMATHEA*
Maybe for Paul the tomb was empty just because Jesus´s body was transformed into a neumatic body and flied away? And therefore there was no need for the women or the disciples to discover the tomb, cause under that new shape Jesus could appear to them at any time and anywhere? It´s just an idea, I´m not an expert.
Cool video. I enjoy your content.
Greetings.
That would void and contradict Mathew, Mark, Luke and John's account. Which it did.
Some important notes for this wonderful clip-
1. Even if it is said that there was an empty tomb, this is of course not evidence that Jesus rose from the dead, even the gospels say that Roman soldiers said that women or disciples of Jesus came and took him out of his tomb, obviously the gospels write that it is because the Jews gave them money to lie, but that is the claim of the gospels and who He said that the truth was precisely with the Jews? Maybe they just got the tomb of Jesus wrong? The gospels themselves also say that the women came to his grave to take him out of the grave and anoint him with perfumes, of course there is no logic in this. Maybe there was some crazy woman who went there and took him out of his grave?
2. Although the Gospels say that Jesus appeared to his disciples in a physical form (as they saw him eat or touched him, etc.), but at first they themselves say that they saw a human being and did not think at all that it was Jesus, that is, he did not resemble Jesus at all, only later they "realized" that he was Jesus, the question is if it was Jesus who came out of his grave and walked the earth, how could it be that they did not recognize him? The gospels also say that Jesus "appeared" to them and then once again "disappeared" from them, meaning that it was not really his body, could it be that it was some - who disguised himself as Jesus and not really Jesus? The gospels also do not say that Jesus said to them "I am Jesus", it is also strange why he did not say this to them.
From this evidence and more even if we admit that the tomb was empty and the disciples of Jesus met someone who "understood" that he was Jesus, it is impossible to really know if it is really true that Jesus rose from the dead, needless to say that Jesus was "prophesied" that he would rise after 3 days and 3 nights but even according to them he rose after 2 Nights and not 3 nights, Paul and the gospels also wrote that it is written in the Bible that this is how we will know who the Messiah is, although it is not written anywhere, you see they lied if so who knows what else they lied about.
The arguments that you are presenting to show that Paul and the gospel writers lied about the Resurrection is flawed. You assume that because Jesus appears to two of his disciples and then disappears in front of them somehow proves that Jesus never resurrected bodily despite the fact that the gospels affirm that he did rise bodily. You really need to broadened your understanding. If the gospels have in fact confirmed that he resurrected bodily then we don’t need to assume or believe that they lied about his bodily resurrection just because he was able to appear and disappear right in front of them. When Jesus was alive he was able to walk on water, think about that for a moment. You don’t need to be a ghost to walk on water. You just need to have the power of God with you. There are many examples from the New Testament of Jesus disappearing while he was still alive before the crucifixion. In John chapter 8 for example after Jesus said before Abraham was born I am. the crowd there wanted to stone him to death. But as the gospel of John says he slipped right out from them into the crowd. In other words he simply vanished into thin air while still alive. Even in the book of acts you have Nathaniel who spoke with the eunuch , it says that after the eunuch was baptized the spirit of God took Nathaniel away from the eunuchs sight and the eunuch never saw Nathaniel again. So broaden your mind Jesus always preformed great miracles. So appearing and disappearing in front of Jesus disciples would not be proof That the resurrection of Jesus in bodily form is false. It only proves that Jesus indeed did resurrect In bodily form and as some one who is alive again he is able to do the same things he did before he died which is preform miracles such as appearing and disappearing in bodily form not as a spirit.
*The Testimonium Flavianum is as authentic as the Shroud of Turin.*
@@bubbagumpy978 The Testimonium Flavianum is also a xtian hoax, so is jesus altogether, sorry...
There is only one law on earth - Moses laws !
Everyone is subject to the seven laws given to Noah. See Genesis 1-9.
@@AdaraBalabusta Generally speaking Israel were given 613 commandments that they have to keep while non Israelis (gentiles) should keep only seven Noahide laws !
@@indigo2009No. Jewish people are subject to both the Noahide and Mosaic Laws. HTH.
@@indigo2009You are contradicting yourself, then, because you stated that the Law of Moses was the only law.
@@AdaraBalabusta "Jewish people are subject to both the Noahide and Mosaic Laws " - I agree with your statement.
Christianity can’t exist without Jesus resurrection. End of topic. Why do any rabbi will accept the resurrection of Jesus??? Why??? Beside being curious about Judaism what is the interest for Christians to listen to this man?
The tomb was empty and the the Jewish leaders paid a sum of money to say that his Jewish disciples disciples stole him away.
The tomb was empty, Rav Singer, bc Yeshua was never in there to begin with.
Hashem would never have let Yeshua be crucified. That would be against Torah.
Stop believing the Greeks and their Gospels.
The Roman occupation and the greek exile were the same. The Greeks never left - they just changed uniforms.
Hashem allows the evil one to exist as this helps propel free will.
The true writer of the NT IS the Sa-tan.
The true writer of the Quran IS the Sa-tan.
The Sa-tan uses Christianity to engineer dissent, and it encourages the Jews to...
1) Leave Judaism
2) Embrace Christianity/ other religions
3) Fall away from the One G-d
4) Trash other Jews - including Yeshua
Once this becomes apparent, everything is illuminated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The reasons the Temples were destroyed were ...
Lashon Hara against Hashem
Lashon Hara against the Torah and His teachings.
Lashon Hara against fellow Jews.
Once one understands this, Christianity and the NT makes perfect sense.
DO NOT speak Lashon Hara against any Jews - walking the earth or not - including Yeshua.
If Jews were correct in their Lashon Hara against Yeshua, then Hashem would have ushered in the Redemption already.
A Jew is fully capable of denying Christianity and all its teachings and trappings while simultaneously not destroying a fellow Jew's character.
Good luck. G-d bless you, G-d bless Israel.
Thank you for protecting the sanctity of the Sinai Covenant.
I love how you steelman Christianity and it still can't stand on it's own legs. Thank you Rabbi.
Mass-produced *EVANGELION (good news of military victory, pure filth)* written for mass distribution throughout the empire...
Mark is consensus dated to 70 CE - 73 CE (Roman War Propaganda)
It is usually dated through the eschatological discourse in Mark 13, which scholars interpret as pointing to the First Jewish-Roman War (66-74 CE)-a war that led to the destruction of the Second Temple in CE 70.
Not for much longer...
Just saying , why dont for example attack Islam or Hinduism ???You focus all all youre strength on Christianity is it wrong or ?? , not correct ??? I know WHY from the bible Nt AND OT !!! GOD Bless you , im not an enemy , but i have to constructively critizise you not the Biblios !!! Pro 18:17 The first to state his own case, seems right, Until another comes and examines him !!! Mat 28:11 Now when they were going, behold, some of the watch came into the city, and shewed unto the chief priests all the things that were done.
Mat 28:12 And when they were assembled with the elders, and had taken counsel, they gave large money unto the soldiers,
Mat 28:13 Saying, Say ye, His disciples came by night, and stole him away while we slept.
Mat 28:14 And if this come to the governor's ears, we will persuade him, and secure you.
Mat 28:15 So they took the money, and did as they were taught: and this saying is commonly reported among the Jews until this day.
Rabbi is a guest on a radio call in show.. He is only answering questions that callers put to him.
I know 😂😂😂❤
@@just.a.dude.7 Call into the show and ask Rabbi questions regards Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Satanism, Mormonism, Paganism, Gnosticism.. etc etc as compared to Judaism if you're curious.
Actually, someone called in on today’s live show and asked about Islam.
Hinduism does not send aggressive missionaries to Israel and to Jewish neighborhoods throughout the world; the idolatrous church does.
Except for the parts stolen from Tanach, the nt is fictional.
Matthew is not the word of G-d so who cares? The focus is on Christianity because of the unrelenting attacks against Judaism by missionaries. If they quit trying to lead Jews into idolatry we wouldn't care what they believe.
Matthew, and all the gospels, were written a minimum of 40 years after the death of Jesus. John is into the second century. The writers were anonymous, didn't know Jesus or any of the original disciples and couldn't read or write Hebrew. Christian missionaries use Greek texts to attack our religion. You better believe we will defend our faith to the last.
Replace Jesus in the Bible with The SUN and you'll see another story - the true story.
You are wrong about all the gospels written MUCH later after Paul, only John was written much later 90 AD other around 50 AD
Good morning Rabbi ! I kindly request you to give me explanation on the following words of God no one can delete them or misinterpret them
Psalm 71 verse 20
Daniel 12 verse 2 and 3
Hosea 6 verse 1 and 2
Isaiah 26 verse 19
Psalm 16 verse 8-11
Jonah 1 verse 17
Job 19 verse 25 -27
Yes according to the Holy Bible that I know the Birth the stay the death and finally the resurrection of Yeshua was foretold accurately. God Bless you Rabbi
Psalms 71:20
Are you suggesting that it references Jesus because it talks about raising up from the earth? You have to read the entire Psalm. It also talks about the Lord supporting the psalmist in his age in years. This is typical Christian exegesis pulling out a single line from a Psalm or text that in no way shape or form is Messianic. And by the way, if it was about Jesus, It wouldn't have been raised from the Earth would it? It would have been taken out of the cave...
Daniel 12: 2-3
So because it references a resurrection it is about Jesus? Once again, no. This refers to the end of days when the righteous are raised to everlasting life but the unrighteous are also raised to be ashamed and disgraced before they are utterly destroyed. I mean this one's not even close...
Hosea 6:1-2
He (G-d) shall revive us! If it was about Jesus who is the us? Christians like this one because it has reference to a third day revival. Notice it doesn't say resurrect. Those to be revived are not dead.
Isaiah 26:19
There will be a resurrection when the true Messiah comes to power. Corpses!!!! Not corpse. Christians use Messianic references to the raising of the Dead to link to Jesus.
Psalm 16 v 8-11
Yikes. Read the first sentence of Psalm 16. A michtam of David! David extolling G-d.
Jonah 1:17
There is no v 17 in Jonah 1 in the Hebrew. It is in the Christian versions. In the belly of the fish for 3 days and 3 nights. A little typology right? Homework assignment. Pick a gospel account. Count the days and nights in the make believe tomb. Not adding up are they?
So a long dead friend of mine suddenly drives up to my house. What is the likely first reaction? Look at the car he came to visit me?? You don't have an argument here Rabbi.
If you worship Jesus, you worship (at best) a man. Worshiping any creation is a serious sin called Idolatry. Repent.
So you agree? Why are you on this channel?
I obviously don't agree. The reason why I'm here is the same reason why I'm also on atheist channels. I'm an ex-athiest.
And no, concept of trinity is all over the Bible, even though the word itself doesn't occur.
@@Thoughtflux ok, ex atheist. Hope you learn something here. You can dig up lots of concepts in Tanach if you have an agenda to find a concept. There's the talking animal concept, there's a couple examples of that but no one's started a talking animal religion yet. There are so many explicit references to G_d being one and unambiguous declarations referring to G_d in the singular. Pity you have to rely on“3” angels here and “3” days there to claim a rock solid trinity doctrine which is really a flimsy and inadequate claim. Why don't you accept these explicit references to G_d just being one and there is no other? Rather you’re happy to swallow up the ambiguous and vague ones, which have no connection to G_d being 3 people. : /
@@paulc3307 It is true that the concept of a Triune God was not explicitly mentioned in the revelation to the ancient Israelites in the Torah. Even though you can see a complex Godhead in many places in the Torah (eg Daniel 7 13 and also 14).
God has a covenant exclusively with the children of Abraham in the Torah. Nowhere does the Torah mention saving the gentiles.
God makes a second covenant with gentiles in the new testament through the passover lamb of God - Jesus.
Proving that God cares about all of humanity.
Imo, Judaism & Christianity can coexist. Both are coherent and given the nature of the Bible, it is not possible for man to create it.
Okay so if they were in Paul letters you would believe it? No would likely not. Jesus had another body after he rose. He did have nail marks in his hands. However he could disappear in instant.
What is “they”? Your pronoun reference is a bit vague.
In any case, the character Saul-Paul disqualified himself as a reliable witness because he bragged about deceiving people.
Repent directly to G’d. Obey the seven laws given to all in Genesis.
He could dissatisfied in an instant? So could Lord Voldemort.
Isaiah 6:9-10 is all that needs to be said to you . I am praying for you
False. Paul believed in a physical, bodily resurrection (Romans 8:11, 2 Corinthians 5:1-4, Colossians 2:9).
Paul also believed that The White Throne Judgment Seat replaced jesus with HaShem. ABSOLUTELY NOT.
How can you trust what Saul-Paul allegedly wrote/said when he bragged about deceiving people?
Except for the parts stolen from Tanach, the nt is fictional.
Repent.
In Corinthians chapter 2 verses 1-4 there is no mention of the resurrection of Jesus at all. Not even mentioned. In Romans chapter 8 it is only written that the Spirit of God raised Jesus from the dead, it is not written that it was in a bodily form, nor in Colossians is it spoken of the resurrection of Jesus.
1. Even if it is said that there was an empty tomb, this is of course not evidence that Jesus rose from the dead, even the gospels say that Roman soldiers said that women or disciples of Jesus came and took him out of his tomb, obviously the gospels write that it is because the Jews gave them money to lie, but that is the claim of the gospels and who He said that the truth was precisely with the Jews? Maybe they just got the tomb of Jesus wrong? The gospels themselves also say that the women came to his grave to take him out of the grave and anoint him with perfumes, of course there is no logic in this. Maybe there was some crazy woman who went there and took him out of his grave?
2. Although the Gospels say that Jesus appeared to his disciples in a physical form (as they saw him eat or touched him, etc.), but at first they themselves say that they saw a human being and did not think at all that it was Jesus, that is, he did not resemble Jesus at all, only later they "realized" that he was Jesus, the question is if it was Jesus who came out of his grave and walked the earth, how could it be that they did not recognize him? The gospels also say that Jesus "appeared" to them and then once again "disappeared" from them, meaning that it was not really his body, could it be that it was some - who disguised himself as Jesus and not really Jesus? The gospels also do not say that Jesus said to them "I am Jesus", it is also strange why he did not say this to them.
From this evidence and more even if we admit that the tomb was empty and the disciples of Jesus met someone who "understood" that he was Jesus, it is impossible to really know if it is really true that Jesus rose from the dead, needless to say that Jesus was "prophesied" that he would rise after 3 days and 3 nights but even according to them he rose after 2 Nights and not 3 nights, Paul and the gospels also wrote that it is written in the Bible that this is how we will know who the Messiah is, although it is not written anywhere, you see they lied if so who knows what else they lied about.
JeBus is anything but logic he/it is the anti-thesis of logic...
"Yeshua IS Logos(Logic)"
OK, so if moses said to God, don't destroy your inheritance. Who is he referring to when talking to God is God a son, or is it more likely that his son is using God's name
The son of God is the people of Israel.
@@dnybwzglw162 ready my comment and scripture correctly
How do you imagin death on a Cross then Resurrection without empty tomb ??? Sharpen your Logic !!! This is Illogical !!
You need to realize, research, and accept, that NOWHERE did God ever mention the "Yeshua/Jesus" character to us, NOWHERE did He tell us that we need to be "saved", and NOWHERE did He tell us that He requires HUMAN BLOOD (a purely pagan ritual that God ABHORS!!) as atonement for our sins.
NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore, Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God!
PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
Other than the nt, there exists no reliable contemporary reference to any of the stories in the nt.
Nobody noticed the following:
1. The m*rder by the King of hundreds of infants and toddlers in Bethlehem, which is a suburb of Jerusalem;
2. The massive numbers of people who were allegedly resurrected simultaneously with J-dude;
3. That J-dude hung around Jerusalem for forty days after his alleged resurrection.
Except for the parts stolen from Tanach to lend verisimilitude and the mention of a few historical figures, the nt is fictional.
Repent of your sins directly to G’d, Who is neither a man nor a trio.
Obey the seven laws given to all in Genesis 1-9.
@@User-x5s3x
I absolutely endorse the books you listed. If people really want to know the wisdom of Judaism, these books will show it.
Fiction 😂
Will Tovia Singer bow down to Jesus as its written in the Bible? Like Paul (Saul) did too?
Jeremiah 16: 19O LORD, my strength, and my stronghold,
And my refuge, in the day of affliction,
Unto Thee shall the nations come
From the ends of the earth, and shall say:
‘Our fathers have inherited nought but lies,
Vanity and things wherein there is no profit.’
20Shall a man make unto himself gods,
And they are no gods?
21Therefore, behold, I will cause them to know,
This once will I cause them to know
My hand and My might;
And they shall know that My name is the LORD.
NT isn't bible
@@louishaywood4999 this is Jesus Christ
We don't bow down to men or to idols.!
@@u.y.3643What did Abraham and Joshua bow down to? Mordecai would not bow down to Haman
I’m not aware of any believer in Yeshua as messiah that believes His resurrection was “spiritual”.
@@orlandonava9397: You need to realize, research, and accept, that NOWHERE did God ever mention the "Yeshua/Jesus" character to us, NOWHERE did He tell us that we need to be "saved", and NOWHERE did He tell us that He requires HUMAN BLOOD (a purely pagan ritual that God ABHORS!!) as atonement for our sins.
NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore, Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God!
PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
It doesn’t really matter as your idol likely never existed at all.
Repent of idolatry and the rest of your sins directly to G’d, make amends to anyone to whom you have caused harm, and obey the seven laws given to all in Genesis.
"empty tomb", loaves and fishes, wine to water, etc. - false. pillar of fire leading millions of Jews in the desert for 40 years and providing all necessities of life - true. seems like the logical fallacy of special pleading.
The latter events that you mentioned (the wandering in the desert, etc.) were witnessed by millions and have some outside historical correlation. HTH.
@@AdaraBalabusta - the testimony of the events being "witnessed by millions" comes from the Torah. A document can't confirm itself. There is evidence of a Hebrew connection to ancient Egypt (Moses' name, for example) and the Torah can be read as a refutation of the culture and religion of Egypt and similar ancient empires (the late Rabbi Lord Sacks wrote extensively about this). But, one could just as well say that the events of the Iliad were witnessed by tens of thousands of Hellenic soldiers who ultimately returned to their homes. There even seems to be a city of Troy that was conquered and burned at the same time. But that doesn't prove that there was a near invincible warrior named Achilles who was the child of a goddess and that Greek gods such as Poseidon and Apollo took part in the battles. FWIW, I'm a Jew who tries to be observant, davens in Orthodox minyanim, sent his kids to yeshiva and has a daughter, son-in-law and grandsons in Israel. I believe that the Torah in the form we have it in shul was revealed to the Jews by God, the Creator of the universe, Redeemer of the Jews and Giver of a moral code for all mankind with particular obligations for the Jews. I just believe that can't be objectively "proved" by the text of the Torah in the same sense, for example, that the Declaration of Independence and American Revolution can be proved. For that reason, although his work is often interesting, I believe Rabbi Singer errs when he takes cheap and nasty shots at Christians (calling them idolators, as if they sacrifice infants and pray to Ba'al, or saying their beliefs are irrational (not much more irrational than ours, IMHO, but rationality, while important, isn't the only standard (ask Job) ... unless one is a Greek philosopher)) . With respect to relations with Christians, I prefer the work of Orthodox rabbis such as Pesach Wolicki, who focuses on common ground and fellowship with Christians. IMHO that is not just the right thing to do but, after 10.07, the prudent thing. Who else, in this world, will ally with the Jews?
@@marchess286
Every 500 years or so, historians have noted, the church undergoes significant change.
Your implied threat against the Jewish people is part of what I have observed in the neo-church. The neo-church pretends friendship to Israel (the country and the people). However, underneath the facade, the neo-church has the same goal of the worst of the crusaders: worship our idol or else.
I am well aware that a text cannot be used to prove the veracity of itself. That was my main critique of Strobel’s work. His arguments, further, relied upon circular reasoning.
My point in mentioning that the events related in Exodus had been witnessed by millions was that the events in Exodus and other places in Tanach were national events, not private or small group events.
The nt mentions several truly remarkable events about which nobody outside of the nt remarks.
I doubt very seriously that Jesus ever existed.
If Jesus did exist, I pity him. He was probably a Nazir whose followers deified him after his death.
If Jesus did exist, he was an ordinary man, conceived in the usual way. He was not the messiah because, per the nt. Jesus taught contrary to the Torah on dozens of occasions, which the messiah would never do.
Per the nt, Jesus sinned, but the text provides no evidence that he repented. The messiah might sin, being human; he would repent, though.
Articles of Possible Interest (titles, not links)
Exodus Evidence: An Egyptologist Looks at Biblical History
Abraham's Children in the Genome Era: Major Jewish Diaspora Populations Comprise Distinct Genetic Clusters with Shared Middle Eastern Ancestry
@@AdaraBalabusta - thank you for your two responses. My comments (to which you were responding) seem to have been deleted. I can only assume this was done by Rabbi Singer or his staff. I hope they put them back, but am not betting on it.
מוחמד הוא חלם חלומות טובים היה לו חלום טוב בלילה ואז הוא קם ואמר שהמלאך גבריאל נתגלה אליו
NOWHERE did God ever mention anyone named "Mohammed" to us, and NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore, the Quran absolutely did NOT come from God, and is a man-made work of fiction, though it's not pagan like Christianity is.
There are Huge Logical fallacies her !!! Yeshua IS Logos(Logic)
Christianity lacks common sense! The One True Creator G_d who created all of the Cosmos and everything in it doesn't need any middleman to forgive anyone of their sins! The One True Creator G_d has said this from the very beginning!
Bereshit (Genesis) 4:
3Now it came to pass at the end of days, that Cain brought of the fruit of the soil an offering to the Lord. גוַיְהִ֖י מִקֵּ֣ץ יָמִ֑ים וַיָּבֵ֨א קַ֜יִן מִפְּרִ֧י הָֽאֲדָמָ֛ה מִנְחָ֖ה לַֽיהֹוָֽה:
4And Abel he too brought of the firstborn of his flocks and of their fattest, and the Lord turned to Abel and to his offering. דוְהֶ֨בֶל הֵבִ֥יא גַם־ה֛וּא מִבְּכֹר֥וֹת צֹאנ֖וֹ וּמֵֽחֶלְבֵהֶ֑ן וַיִּ֣שַׁע יְהֹוָ֔ה אֶל־הֶ֖בֶל וְאֶל־מִנְחָתֽוֹ:
5But to Cain and to his offering He did not turn, and it annoyed Cain exceedingly, and his countenance fell. הוְאֶל־קַ֥יִן וְאֶל־מִנְחָת֖וֹ לֹ֣א שָׁעָ֑ה וַיִּ֤חַר לְקַ֨יִן֙ מְאֹ֔ד וַיִּפְּל֖וּ פָּנָֽיו:
6And the Lord said to Cain, "Why are you annoyed, and why has your countenance fallen? ווַיֹּ֥אמֶר יְהֹוָ֖ה אֶל־קָ֑יִן לָ֚מָּה חָ֣רָה לָ֔ךְ וְלָ֖מָּה נָֽפְל֥וּ פָנֶֽיךָ:
7Is it not so that if you improve, it will be forgiven you? If you do not improve, however, at the entrance, sin is lying, and to you is its longing, but you can rule over it." זהֲל֤וֹא אִם־תֵּיטִיב֙ שְׂאֵ֔ת וְאִם֙ לֹ֣א תֵיטִ֔יב לַפֶּ֖תַח חַטָּ֣את רֹבֵ֑ץ וְאֵלֶ֨יךָ֙ תְּשׁ֣וּקָת֔וֹ וְאַתָּ֖ה תִּמְשָׁל־בּֽוֹ:
*** See!!! No so-called "Jesus " is ever needed!!! Never has been!!! Never will be!!!
The One True Creator G_d forbids 🚫 human sacrifice! It is an abomination!!! The One True Creator G_d specifically said in no uncertain terms that NO One can die for the sins of another! You and you alone are responsible for your own actions!
Yechezkel (Ezekiel) 18:
20The soul that sins, it shall die; a son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, and a father shall not bear the iniquity of the son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself. כהַנֶּ֥פֶשׁ הַֽחֹטֵ֖את הִ֣יא תָמ֑וּת בֵּ֞ן לֹֽא־יִשָּׂ֣א | בַּֽעֲוֹ֣ן הָאָ֗ב וְאָב֙ לֹ֚א יִשָּׂא֙ בַּֽעֲוֹ֣ן הַבֵּ֔ן צִדְקַ֚ת הַצַּדִּיק֙ עָלָ֣יו תִּֽהְיֶ֔ה וְרִשְׁעַ֥ת הָֽרָשָׁ֖ע (כתיב רָשָׁ֖ע) עָלָ֥יו תִּֽהְיֶֽה:
21 And if the wicked man repent of all his sins that he has committed and keeps all My laws and executes justice and righteousness, he shall surely live, he shall not die. כאוְהָֽרָשָׁ֗ע כִּ֚י יָשׁוּב֙ מִכָּל־חַטֹּאתָיו֙ (כתיב חַטֹּאתָו֙) אֲשֶׁ֣ר עָשָׂ֔ה וְשָׁמַר֙ אֶת־כָּל־חֻקּוֹתַ֔י וְעָשָׂ֥ה מִשְׁפָּ֖ט וּצְדָקָ֑ה חָיֹ֥ה יִחְיֶ֖ה לֹ֥א יָמֽוּת:
22All his transgressions that he has committed shall not be remembered regarding him: through his righteousness that he has done he shall live. כבכָּל־פְּשָׁעָיו֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר עָשָׂ֔ה לֹ֥א יִזָּֽכְר֖וּ ל֑וֹ בְּצִדְקָת֥וֹ אֲשֶׁר־עָשָׂ֖ה יִֽחְיֶֽה:
23Do I desire the death of the wicked? says the Lord God. Is it not rather in his repenting of his ways that he may live? כגהֶֽחָפֹ֚ץ אֶחְפֹּץ֙ מ֣וֹת רָשָׁ֔ע נְאֻ֖ם אֲדֹנָ֣י יֱהֹוִ֑ה הֲל֛וֹא בְּשׁוּב֥וֹ מִדְּרָכָ֖יו (כתיב מִדְּרָכָ֖ו) וְחָיָֽה:
*** See!!! Still No so-called "Jesus " is ever needed!!! Never has been!!! Never will be!!!
The One True Creator G_d forbids 🚫 Adultery!!! But Christians want people to believe that G_d got another man's wife pregnant just like Zeus used to run around doing. Christianity is a lie! Christianity adopted way too many idolatrous and pagan beliefs contrary to what The One True Creator G_d actually said. We follow the instructions of the One True Creator G_d!!! Not the lies of Christianity.
You need to realize, research, and accept, that NOWHERE did God ever mention the "Yeshua/Jesus" character to us, NOWHERE did He tell us that we need to be "saved", and NOWHERE did He tell us that He requires HUMAN BLOOD (a purely pagan ritual that God ABHORS!!) as atonement for our sins.
NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore, Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God!
PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
Improve ??? Of Ourse God Can forgive , but “Improve” ??? This is a lengthy text and my Hebrew is not Yet perfect !!! But you seem to take a militant view to this but I understand: 2Co 3:13 And not as Moses, which put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished:
2Co 3:14 But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ.
This is an unfinished answer because im rusty !!! But soon ill cetch up (pun intended !! But i bless You in Yeshuas Name because i believe we both believe in the Same Elohim !!! ❤
The question here are to long and my keyboard is not to use but i stand By my Owner ישוע ❤
And His father יהוה ❤
Amazing how you call Paul a liar in your other videos, but now you suddenly want to accept his lack of talking about the empty tomb! Paul himself says in 2 Corinthians 5 that believers should not be focused on Christ according to His earthly fleshly life, but His glorious spirit body seated at the right hand of The Father. Paul was instructed by the glorified Savior from heaven. Praying for your eyes to be opened to your true Messiah. Jesus died for your sins and defeated death for all humanity!
Nobody can die for your sins.
Saul-Paul bragged about deceiving people. Why would you trust someone like that?
Paul very likely couldn't read or speak Hebrew. The claim that he was a student of Gamliel is laughable. He claims to be a Pharisee and can't read the language of Tanahk? By the way, he claims to be of the Tribe of Benjamin but elsewhere he claims to be a Herodian which makes him an Idumean. Acts has him a Roman citizen. Three separate claims of identify and none are compatible...
@@davidkatz341Acts also lists his occupation as tent-maker, which I find funny as xtianity is like a carnival show! 😂
אין אלוהים חוץ מאללה, מוחמד הוא השליח של אללה
Keep the 7 Noahide laws and leave Jews alone.
I saw that on Apostate Prophet TH-cam channel did you?
לא
There is no deity but the G’d of Abraham. I will agree with that part of your statement because the Jews and the Muslims worship the same deity.
I have read the Qu’Ran and cannot agree that Muhammad is a prophet.
Is there any precedence for someone being physically raised from the dead in the Tanach? What is the proof of their resurrection? Whether or not Jesus was physically raised from the dead and ascended to heaven I don't think really mattered to the Nazarene Jews. What did matter to them, was his life example (Torahly righteous living) and what he (as the expected Prophet "like unto Moses") taught.
It's an interesting phenomenon that in all of the Nazarene Apostle Peter's Jewish teachings found in the Clementine Literature (and there is a lot) on the resurrection of the righteous (and the unrighteous) to their respective judgments, Peter does not speak as to the physical resurrection and ascension of Jesus, and Peter only mentions the crucifixion just one time, briefly.
Peter doesn't mention the R and A of Jesus to his Jew and Gentile mixed audiences. Perhaps it was a known fact and so it didn't need mentioning. What was more important to the Nazarene Jewish Apostles, was the teachings of Jesus, that "if" followed, would ensure the righteous Gentiles a place in the resurrection into the future Messianic Kingdom. The Nazarene Apostles' disposition was that the Jews themselves had the Laws and teachings of Moses, which if followed faithfully, it would ensure them a place in the resurrection of the righteous Jews. Paulinism subverts that...
To those 12 Nazarene Apostles at the time (and the thousands of Jews who witnessed the teachings and miracles of Jesus (as the 2nd Moses)), did they really need an "empty" tomb to solidify their belief in Jesus as the "True Prophet" and "once and future" Messiah....after all of the miracles they had witnessed?
The "Prophet like Moses" was the Prophet Joshua, who led the people after after the death of Moses. Read CAREFULLY!!
@@User-x5s3x
I don’t believe that most of these unfortunate folks know how to read carefully, alas. 😔
In answer to your question, no, the Tanach does not tell of anyone being resurrected.
I don’t care what any of the characters in the novel called the nt said or did. Except for the parts stolen from Tanach, the nt is fictional.
@@AdaraBalabusta Are 1 Kings 17:17-24; 2 Kings 4:18-37; 2 Kings 13:21 part of the Tanach? Asking for a friend....
@@User-x5s3x Read what carefully? Give me a reference to read and I will read it carefully. Show me where it says "Joshua" is "that" Prophet....it doesn't exist.
Joshua is not the Prophet "like unto Moses", if he were, Moses would have named him then and there, immediately.
Moses did however hand his leadership authority over to Joshua...and Joshua was a prophet (no doubt), but he was not a prophet on the same scale "like unto" Moses....not close.
Quick question: How many miracles are on the record performed by or are attributed to Moses?
Next: How many are on record performed by or are attributed to Joshua?
Next: How many miracles are on record performed by or are attributed to Jesus?
These are easy to find....which of the two Joshua or Jesus, is on par with Moses, just by the sheer numbers and quality alone?
Jesus become Messiah only toward Messianic Jews therefore only One hundred and forty-four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel were sealed because Jewish religious leaders such as Tovia Singer much like Pharisees and Sadducees in the past who rejected Yeshua Ha Nazri Wu Melech Ha Yehudim.
So when Yeshua Ha Nazri Wu Melech Ha Yehudim said to them, “Watch out! Guard yourselves against the hametz of the P’rushim and Tz’dukim,” The teaching of Tovia Singer much like the hametz of the P’rushim and Tz’dukim in the past.
"Many are called, but few are chosen." Many Jewish people are called to be back establishing Country of Israel, but few are chosen to follow Yeshua Ha Nazri Wu Melech Ha Yehudim.
(Tovia Singer believes in Tanakh and Talmud, but Christians believe in Tanakh and Gospel. So Be It, Let It Be.)
Even those Moslem Scholars told that ALLAH (ٱللَّٰه) as The Moon God was one of 360 Arabian Idols at Kaabah before Muhammad SAW was born. Later, Muhammad SAW and his followers able to manage ALLAH (ٱللَّٰه) the Moon GOD becoming the Champion of the Arabian Idol Competition, but doesn't make ALLAH (ٱللَّٰه) to be the real GOD because ALLAH(ٱللَّٰه) is still merely Substance as Arabian Idol.
If you know about GOD particle, doesn't make the substance is the true GOD. They just make a false claim because it is still merely a Substance as particle.
If those false teachers unable to read יהוה properly, should Jewish people follow their lectures? Therefore Hidden agendas from the textbooks of western government actually are against pure logic as political correctness for example: Isa Al Masih is the same person of Jesus Christ, ALLAH (ٱللَّٰه) is the same of YHWH (יהוה) with intention of misleading religious people. Persons in the western government who arranged the hidden agendas could be atheists who don't understand TANAKH, GOSPEL and AL QUR'AN.
The 144,000 idea comes from Revelation and is a Rrrrippp Offfff from ZECHARIAH. The 1/3 rd will not be a FRACTION, but a THIRD ONE. You don't know what you're talking about even within Xhristian Doctrines. NO.
@@russrussel3947
Who Cares? It is their own teaching. Every Christians know that Jewish Tovia Singer much like Pharisees and Sadducees in the past who rejected Yeshua Ha Nazri Wu Melech Ha Yehudim. But by any mean, Paradise is the Kingdom of Yeshua Ha Nazri Wu Melech Ha Yehudim. So Be It, Let It Be.
@@yourbuddy6421: Learn the difference between "Pharisees" and "Saducees" before pontificating on subjects you know ZERO about!!
You need to realize, research, and accept, that NOWHERE did God ever mention the "Yeshua/Jesus" character to us, NOWHERE did He tell us that we need to be "saved", and NOWHERE did He tell us that He requires HUMAN BLOOD (a purely pagan ritual that God ABHORS!!) as atonement for our sins.
NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, therefore, Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God!
PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover), and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books, as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
@@User-x5s3x
Exactly, The term of Son of GOD accepted by Gentiles who follow Pagan Teaching after the ascention therefore, Gentiles believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of Living GOD as Father who art in Heaven. It is beyond the believe system of Jewish such as Pharisees and Sadducees.
Tovia Singer believes in Tanakh and Talmud, but Christians believe in Tanakh and Gospel. So Be It, Let It Be.
When Jesus heard this, he was amazed and said to those following him, “Truly I tell you, I have not found anyone in Israel with such great faith. I say to you that many will come from the east and the west, and will take their places at the feast with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven. But the subjects of the kingdom (such as Tovia Singer?) will be thrown outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
@@yourbuddy6421
Per G’d, Israel (the Jewish people, collectively) is His son. See Exodus 4 v 22.
Except for the parts stolen from Tanach, the nt is fictional.
Thanks!