maybe an alternate universe but even then that's a stretch. but could there be such a universe? seeings how there could be infinite amounts. various accounts. what if gravity was stronger causing planets to be flat?
Flat earthers waste so much of everyone's time and they even infiltrate StarTalk and waste my time even more, even for the sake of a joke-Chuck's joked about it since the early years.
@@darkerufo Their idea prison - need not be disc - cussed - at all. Mostly a circular logic - of not knowing - to spiralling ever onwards - as the knot tightens. One always - has to practice discernment - to walk in this world. The journey has to have a goal - and not a pointless sludge of thought and then stop. Fare thee well - on life's journey.
It was inevitable. Tyson's extraordinary mass was bound to suck everything into it's gravity well. Soon Chuck will be absorbed into Tyson like a McDonald's breakfast biscuit.
Disclaimer and Trigger warning: This video contains copious amounts of truth and common sense. These values have been found to break what ever flat-earthers use to think with.
“is it big enough (mass & gravity) to be a sphere?”…THAT IS PROFOUND I CAN APPLY THAT WISDOM TO MANY AREAS OF LIFE THANK YOU NEIL 💎🤯🙏🏽 with gratitude, LaynoProd
If soap bubbles wanna be round, cold pidgeons wanna be round, planets, stars, everything in the universe wanna be round, what's so damn wrong about my belly wanting to be round as well?
I am an ex flat earther. I would LOVE the chance to talk with you Neil and Chuck. I've learned a lot since leaving the belief system of flat earth and gaining my trust back into science. From Dunning Kruger to Cognitive dissonance, to personal bias and tribalism. We have a LOT to talk about Startalk. Your own flat earth debunk is one of the most viewed videos on the channel. An actual chat on here with somebody that once believed the earth was flat would probably "break the internet" My email is in the description on my channel. Please get in touch 🙏
Hey @STST! If you get the chance, please tell Neil that the curve of the horizon is demonstrably detectable at much lower altitude than he declared in the past. 😉
🤔 Lipids are hydrophobic and naturally turn into spheres in water. Cell membranes are lipids. This is how the first cells originated in water. We are made of cells. We are all fat.
🤔 Lipids are hydrophobic and naturally turn into spheres in water. Cell membranes are lipids. This is how the first cells originated in water. We are made of cells. We are all fat.
God bless you, sir. You make understanding science simple. I wish teachers in my day had the intelligence and the integrity to explain things the way you do. I may have chosen a different path in life.
The idea that a sphere is the shape with the smallest surface to volume is one statement, but Tyson manages to explain this one part at a time as if each were a different idea: first, the soap bubble, then the amazing idea that spheres have a lotta volume.
I have been wondering why planets are round for a while now, so this was super exciting to see come out & then watch. Thank you for the always great educational content.
What a fantastic episode! Although in regards to van Allen belt built light operabilities….. we need to chat, there is objectively deeper understanding 🙏❤️❤️🙏
The rebuttal to almost every Flerf "argument" is one word: Gravity. Why can't the world be flat? Gravity. Why doesn't the atmosphere fly away? Gravity. Why don't we get flung off into space by the spinning Earth? Gravity. Desertphile did the world a favour with his famous youtube clip!
I've seen a cube soap bubble. There's a whole performance bit in which the performer used six soap bubbles and connected them in such a way that they formed a cube in the center (he blew smoke into it so that you could see the cube shape).
Forces pulling in all directions to create spherical object. Nice and self-explanatory, a five year old can understand it. A comprehensive example would be a bubble in a bath. It is spherical because of the balance of forces acting on the thin film of liquid surrounding the gas inside.
You've clearly not had the pleasure of reading Flat Earth Friends and such comments, if you value your sanity don't but if you dare glance just be prepared to figure out where we went wrong in society. 😐
When the conquistadors first traveled around the tip of Argentina, they met natives who were much larger than them who lived in the frozen lands of Patagonia, wore little clothes and kept themselves warm by crouching into a tight ball.
something cool about liquid in orbit, is that as you make them larger, the less the surface tension is able to hold it together in a sphere, and the larger you make it, the more powerful in relation to surface tension the tidal forces become, and so you should eventually be able to see the tidal force on a large enough blob. see is a bit of an exaggeration :P
The ISS is only about 13 feet across at most. Not big enough to see an elongation of a water bubble ?? And that would be like ALL the water up there !!
I love this stuff. I wondered at this during the solar eclipse I witnessed a few years ago - but the explanation is so much simpler than I imagined it would be!
If you have watched the astronauts on the ISS playing with water you should have noticed that in the zero gravity that water floating in the air takes on a spherical shape which by the way is actually it's natural shape
@@ziegweid Exactly, and what will it do in a gravity field? In a gravity field it will take the shape of the container that holds it or if not contained it will go to the lowest possible point it can get to
@@gulfy09 They have specialty containers and specific foods for the astronauts so that they can still get proper nutrition and stay hydrated in the zero gravity of space while also keeping them and the ISS safe
I am so happy someone finally gave the difference between spherical and round. I've been trying to tell people this for a while now and they always give me that WTF look!
4.51 : Gravity is bending of space time and not a pulling force. In this case how do you explain round objects? (MAYBE) -> Centripetal + frictional force experienced by the particles on the surface result in them sinking to the center of spinning object, thus forming a sphere?
@@michaelhennaut3141 A square (well cube) bubble was made on the program QI. it took a wire frame, which had bubbles pressing on other bubbles, to flatten the sides (well thats how it looked)
Basically the speed of their orbit keeps gravity from collapsing them into a sphere at the center of the galaxy, but the gravity between the objects keeps them in a plane, as it would take extra energy to break out of that plane. But as others have mentioned, there are some galaxies that are more sphere shaped. Also, perhaps at the end of their life-cycle they will all become spheres as a black hole. The black hole at the center of galaxies are spheres, and they are made up of the mass of the galaxies' materials. The spinning galaxies are basically, the spiraling circling drain we witness when emptying out a bathtub. So eventually most of the material will be absorbed by the spherical black hole. So, the bottom line: eventually, they will be.
It would spread out, because it is impossible to make "perfect line" laser due to some optic laws. But a photon does not fade out (proof: stars in the sky) so each individual photon will fly until... Well, turns out that space is mostly... space and rarely "stuff", so if you point your "photon cannon" in random direction, it is 50% likely to hit Earth (if you are standing on Earth), and 98% to never ever hit anything, because in most directions, there is nothing until "the end" of the universe. (98% is from memory, cannot find source, also, of the 2% to hit a thing, Sun is most likely)
Relativity question. If I were to go the speed of light, time stops for me relative to people who are going slower than me. But what would happen if I were to oscillate in basically the same position in space but oscillate at the speed of light? Would time stop for me in this situation also? I'm not really thinking about an object like myself but I was thinking about all the subatomic particles. From quarks to electrons, All of these things are energy that I imagine is never sitting in a state of stillness. And it is always moving then I would assume it would move at the speed of light regardless of whether it was traveling across great distances or in a stable position in space by oscillating or something like that. So I was just thinking that if this was true then the very things that form all matter are essentially not moving in time and we are all constructed of this material which would almost suggest that in some regards we aren't moving in time... Or it could be the case that the energies that make us aren't moving in time but collectively as more macro objects the macro object can move through time even though it's constituent parts don't move through time because they oscalate at the speed of light? Absolutely nobody is going to answer this. And I can't find anything on Google about this. I'm sure it's ridiculous but would love to satisfy the curiosity if somebody with expertise in this area could provide some insight
You know I really can not genuinely fathom the fact that there are people out there who truly believe it’s flat These replies are out of hand man yall need school 😭😭
I have a question: one that is often taken for granted. If space has finite dimensions and everything in the universe is within this space, what is keeping all objects in space from falling to the bottom of space if any thing? Are celestial bodies free-falling or is there something keeping them suspended / buoyant? Is there a way to even test this given our perspective as observers in the universe? I hope you can answer.
Planets are round due to the force of gravity, which pulls matter towards the center of mass. As a planet forms, gravity pulls equally from all directions, resulting in a spherical shape. This process, known as hydrostatic equilibrium, ensures that the planet's shape is as close to a sphere as possible. How might variations in a planet's composition and rotation affect its deviation from a perfect spherical shape?
Three reasons the earths moon isn't a dwarf planet. 1. It orbits our planet. 2. Much smaller than dwarf planets. 3. Not in hydrostatic equilibrium (enough mass for its self-gravity to pull it into a roughly spherical shape)
Earth's moon cannot be a dwarf planet cuz moon is under the Earth's gravitational influence. There are 3 criterion for any object to be considered a planet: 1)The object must orbit the Sun. 2)The object must be spherical in shape due to its own gravity. 3)The object must have cleared its orbit of other debris. For Pluto which is a dwarf planet it orbits sun, and has enough gravity to be spherical, but lacks the gravity required to clear and accumulate all the debris into itself. -Moon orbits earth.
The Moon is much smaller than dwarf planets? How can you say that when you look at the following examples? Diameter relative to the Moon; Pluto 68% Eris 67% Haumea =45% Makemake 41% Gonggong 35% Charon 35% Quaoar 32% Ceres 27% Orcus 26% Sedna 26% Salacia 24% The Moon doesn’t orbit the Sun independently, the same goes for any of the Moons in the Solar System, anything is officially a Moon when it orbits a planet. Pluto is a dwarf planet but if it was within Earths gravitational field it would no longer be a dwarf planet, it would be a Moon
Interesting 4:30 without a heated core then, planets become ever rounder and ever smoother. Any planet you see with Rocky Mountains must therefore have a volcanic core
Speaking of round, i would pay good money to see Neil & Chuck sit down with Ford's designer Jack Telnack to discuss why he designed the 1996 Taurus to be so round it doesnt have one flat surface on it. ❤
Oh gosh. Soap bubble reminded me of my physics matriculation exam. One of task's was to solve how thick is bubble's film and how fast it's getting smaller and so how much does it take approx for it to pop.
6:09 Ceres is like Pluto's ancestor 😂. It too used to be a planet, in the 1600s iirc (with Juno, Pallas, and Vesta), then got demoted to "big asteroid" when we started to find more celestial objects in the asteroid belt and now it got promoted to "dwarf planet".
Do you still believe in flat Earth?
Never did 😎 ,,,Love from 🇯🇲
maybe an alternate universe but even then that's a stretch. but could there be such a universe? seeings how there could be infinite amounts. various accounts. what if gravity was stronger causing planets to be flat?
Indeed @@rileynguyen8880
Well the earth is mostly covered in water, and that water is not carbonated, so technically it’s flat
Yes!. Any day, anywhere on the globe.
@2:56 that explains my weight gain in the winter months, i am just puffing up to stay warm
I stay fat in the summertime because I like air-conditioning
😊
You’re in perfect shape….round
🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂
When you’re so early that there are no angry flat earther’s unpopular comments around
Damn. They are the most entertaining part 😢
Well, it's flat in places.
Faaaake. Enjoy being sheep, rounders - them, probably
😂😂😂🦄
When you're so early that you witnessed the formation of the Moon after Theia crashed into Earth.
If the Earth was flat, cats would have pushed everything off it by now.
woah😂😂
or should i say
mewooaahhhh😹😹
💀
Flat earthers waste so much of everyone's time and they even infiltrate StarTalk and waste my time even more, even for the sake of a joke-Chuck's joked about it since the early years.
Pushing off things while watching us right into our faces
@@darkerufo Their idea prison - need not be disc - cussed - at all.
Mostly a circular logic - of not knowing - to spiralling ever onwards - as the knot tightens.
One always - has to practice discernment - to walk in this world.
The journey has to have a goal - and not a pointless sludge of thought and then stop.
Fare thee well - on life's journey.
“I can’t afford Cold Duck, I’m drinking Cold Pigeon”😂😂😂
That had me crying. 😂😂😂😂
Still better than "Cold Turkey."
bbrrrrr
😂😂😂
You can tell a lot about someone's intelligence by what they find funny.
New camera? Picture is sharp 👌
That star talk money lol
4K baby! Heck yeah!
3:25 Chuck made a perfect pigeon noise🐦⬛
Yup, so I ain't buying his comment that he never saw a pigeon.
....! In underlying sentences Neil T have spoken about the earth's changes in a smart way for years in my head anyway. Thanks from Sweden!
i love that after corona years, they are finally both in the same room :)
It was inevitable. Tyson's extraordinary mass was bound to suck everything into it's gravity well. Soon Chuck will be absorbed into Tyson like a McDonald's breakfast biscuit.
The sun has badass gravity is a sentence I've never heard before lol
That's how it can hold on to it's gas.
imagine if it didn't..
@@grisslebear and thaat gas creates gravity.
@@alswedgin9274 Neil TheGas Tyson.
Imagine Uranus if it didn't hold it gas😂😆
God bless u Dr Tyson n chucks for the COMEDY, IT MAKES LEARNING EXTREMELY EASY N FUN! THANK U SIR! FROM NIGERIA!
Does Chuck interrupting him constantly annoy you?
@@HandMeDeals u dont know how learning works
I love dr Tyson and chuck’s interactions. Those episodes are my faves of all startalk. Keep up the good work. ( from an 82 1/2 year old)
Disclaimer and Trigger warning: This video contains copious amounts of truth and common sense. These values have been found to break what ever flat-earthers use to think with.
Dr. Tyson explains everything and anything so well. Love him.
These video sessions are great , great host and commentator.
The opposite of cold pigeon is "cat sunning itself" - stretched out as long as possible to maximize surface area-to-volume ratio.
“is it big enough (mass & gravity) to be a sphere?”…THAT IS PROFOUND I CAN APPLY THAT WISDOM TO MANY AREAS OF LIFE THANK YOU NEIL 💎🤯🙏🏽 with gratitude, LaynoProd
Love these two talk! Always highly entertaining and highly educational!
If soap bubbles wanna be round, cold pidgeons wanna be round, planets, stars, everything in the universe wanna be round, what's so damn wrong about my belly wanting to be round as well?
Not a thing.
Your belly is overcoming gravity. It's not in 0 G.
I was eating a Bagel when I read this. I Feel you on that one, brother. 😂
I am an ex flat earther. I would LOVE the chance to talk with you Neil and Chuck. I've learned a lot since leaving the belief system of flat earth and gaining my trust back into science. From Dunning Kruger to Cognitive dissonance, to personal bias and tribalism. We have a LOT to talk about Startalk. Your own flat earth debunk is one of the most viewed videos on the channel. An actual chat on here with somebody that once believed the earth was flat would probably "break the internet" My email is in the description on my channel. Please get in touch 🙏
Hey @STST! If you get the chance, please tell Neil that the curve of the horizon is demonstrably detectable at much lower altitude than he declared in the past. 😉
Your brain washed up
I met a FlatLander who pointed to a pond maybe 50 feet across and asked if it was curved or flat !! He was really fired up about Earth being flat.
They don't talk to traders.
@@peterdarr383 That pond was imperceptibly curved.
Chuck and Tyson I njoy watching u 2
I'm not fat, it's just the forces in the universe conspiring against me.😎
🤔
Lipids are hydrophobic and naturally turn into spheres in water.
Cell membranes are lipids.
This is how the first cells originated in water.
We are made of cells.
We are all fat.
🤔
Lipids are hydrophobic and naturally turn into spheres in water.
Cell membranes are lipids.
This is how the first cells originated in water.
We are made of cells.
We are all fat.
😂
Today is my Friday… I think I’ll go get myself some ‘Cold Pigeon’ to celebrate the weekend 😂 🍾
the pigeon sounds chuck casually made 🐦🤣🤣🤣 gold 🤩 never change chuck
These guys are so well rounded.
Team Pluto!❤😂
Tyson has recently exceeded the mass and circumference of Pluto. We should petition him to be named the new ninth planet.
I love the way Star Trek gets most of the facts straight. 🖖🖖🖖
Fake world you live in
I love you guys! Perfect duo to educate. I wish I had both of ya in school teaching me. I would have loved going into this field!
This Star Talk episode was very good in a roundabout way.
You are one of three persons i want to meet before they die in my life. Big Respect professor Neil deGrasse Tyson.
For wat ?? Lol
@@muggachase407
Why you bitter about life?
@@muggachase407
Why you bitter about life?
Nice try wrong guy
God bless you, sir. You make understanding science simple. I wish teachers in my day had the intelligence and the integrity to explain things the way you do. I may have chosen a different path in life.
Get up off your knees, worshipper.
The idea that a sphere is the shape with the smallest surface to volume is one statement, but Tyson manages to explain this one part at a time as if each were a different idea: first, the soap bubble, then the amazing idea that spheres have a lotta volume.
Have fun. :) I freaking love Chuck.
Please... he's the absolute worst on multiple levels.
I have been wondering why planets are round for a while now, so this was super exciting to see come out & then watch. Thank you for the always great educational content.
Fruits being in spherical shape.......meanwhile, the banana is just a rebel 😂😂😂
Educational Entertainment to the MAX ❕️I Love StarTalk ❤
I am still waiting for flat earthers to explain the whole flat thing without using magic.
Oh yes, you must be referring to the “heavenly energies”🤣
@@jman7638 I believe their scientific term is electromagnetic force.
THAT explains EVERYTHING!
I love to laugh and learn 😄 Thank you guys for providing such good content for years!
What a fantastic episode! Although in regards to van Allen belt built light operabilities….. we need to chat, there is objectively deeper understanding
🙏❤️❤️🙏
The rebuttal to almost every Flerf "argument" is one word: Gravity.
Why can't the world be flat? Gravity.
Why doesn't the atmosphere fly away? Gravity.
Why don't we get flung off into space by the spinning Earth? Gravity.
Desertphile did the world a favour with his famous youtube clip!
You obviously don't understand how gravity works.
😉
@@jennifersilves4195I don't really care if what you said is wrong, what does the winking emoji mean?
The problem is that most flat earthers deny the existence of gravity and space
The problem is that most flat earthers deny the existence of gravity and space
@@ericgolightly8450 I'm REALLY hoping it means she was kidding.
Also snowballs would have been a fun example to pack in there 😂
Good one. Great expaining👏👏
Great videos from you two!! I love your educational and entertaining content!!
I like the physics. I’m just a dude listening in and loving what you teach me. Thanks Neil (and Chuck).
You guys get a new camera? Looks really good.
I've seen a cube soap bubble. There's a whole performance bit in which the performer used six soap bubbles and connected them in such a way that they formed a cube in the center (he blew smoke into it so that you could see the cube shape).
I love these brothers when they do star talk.
Forces pulling in all directions to create spherical object. Nice and self-explanatory, a five year old can understand it. A comprehensive example would be a bubble in a bath. It is spherical because of the balance of forces acting on the thin film of liquid surrounding the gas inside.
You've clearly not had the pleasure of reading Flat Earth Friends and such comments, if you value your sanity don't but if you dare glance just be prepared to figure out where we went wrong in society. 😐
Thanks Neil and Chuck. That was great, informative and funny!
I've literally survived hypothermia by getting as round as possible.
That’s my overall strategy for avoiding hypothermia altogether.
@@jeremycraft8452 I imagine there's a possibility that's ingrained on us on an instinctual level even.
When the conquistadors first traveled around the tip of Argentina, they met natives who were much larger than them who lived in the frozen lands of Patagonia, wore little clothes and kept themselves warm by crouching into a tight ball.
Neil is great by himself but Chuck takes it to another level.
I think it's time for a shot of cold pigeon!
something cool about liquid in orbit, is that as you make them larger, the less the surface tension is able to hold it together in a sphere, and the larger you make it, the more powerful in relation to surface tension the tidal forces become, and so you should eventually be able to see the tidal force on a large enough blob. see is a bit of an exaggeration :P
like an ac next to a soap bubble.
The ISS is only about 13 feet across at most. Not big enough to see an elongation of a water bubble ?? And that would be like ALL the water up there !!
Star Trek *UNDISCOVERED COUNTRY*
😎😎
it's actually shocking how many flerfs (flat Earthers) there are
I am enjoying my chance to catch each podcast , very educational ✊🏽❤️💯
Chuck Nice, you are a rockstar🔥 love you man!! Keep making Startalk your jam!!
I love this stuff. I wondered at this during the solar eclipse I witnessed a few years ago - but the explanation is so much simpler than I imagined it would be!
If you have watched the astronauts on the ISS playing with water you should have noticed that in the zero gravity that water floating in the air takes on a spherical shape which by the way is actually it's natural shape
Surface area/volume efficiency 😂
@@ziegweid Exactly, and what will it do in a gravity field? In a gravity field it will take the shape of the container that holds it or if not contained it will go to the lowest possible point it can get to
How can anyone drink or eat anything
@@gulfy09 They have specialty containers and specific foods for the astronauts so that they can still get proper nutrition and stay hydrated in the zero gravity of space while also keeping them and the ISS safe
@@gulfy09 gravity is not required for drinking/eating.
You can swallow even when standing on your head.
Great new video quality 👌🏻
I am so happy someone finally gave the difference between spherical and round. I've been trying to tell people this for a while now and they always give me that WTF look!
4.51 : Gravity is bending of space time and not a pulling force. In this case how do you explain round objects? (MAYBE) -> Centripetal + frictional force experienced by the particles on the surface result in them sinking to the center of spinning object, thus forming a sphere?
it's easy to make a cubic soap bubble, you just need 9 others to pull it into shape, or a wire frame
Need 6 bubbles. A cube has 6 sides not 9. And it's not a true cube because of round sides.
@@michaelhennaut3141
A square (well cube) bubble was made on the program QI.
it took a wire frame, which had bubbles pressing on other bubbles, to flatten the sides (well thats how it looked)
th-cam.com/users/shorts5PTL5N5c4jc?si=8wDdK9i3DxK7EQuK
Seen photos of a square bubble!
multiple bubbles competing to create the illusion of 1 bubble that has the shape you want...
Love from the mother land South Africa❤ i really enjoy watching this channel real fun way to learn and laugh😂
Why are galaxies disc shaped? Should they not be more round also?
Difference in scale and angular momentum
That's orbit. Most orbits are on a plain. There are galaxies that aren't so organized though
Lots of them are elliptical or round.
Basically the speed of their orbit keeps gravity from collapsing them into a sphere at the center of the galaxy, but the gravity between the objects keeps them in a plane, as it would take extra energy to break out of that plane.
But as others have mentioned, there are some galaxies that are more sphere shaped.
Also, perhaps at the end of their life-cycle they will all become spheres as a black hole. The black hole at the center of galaxies are spheres, and they are made up of the mass of the galaxies' materials. The spinning galaxies are basically, the spiraling circling drain we witness when emptying out a bathtub. So eventually most of the material will be absorbed by the spherical black hole.
So, the bottom line: eventually, they will be.
I'll never unsee Saturn as being partially flattened now, a spheroid. I knew it was but I never noticed it in images of Saturn. Very cool.
Question , if you had a lazer in space , would ot shine all the way until it hit something ? Or would it fade out?
If the photons in the laser are all parallel, it would shine until it hit something.
It would spread out, because it is impossible to make "perfect line" laser due to some optic laws.
But a photon does not fade out (proof: stars in the sky) so each individual photon will fly until...
Well, turns out that space is mostly... space and rarely "stuff", so if you point your "photon cannon" in random direction, it is 50% likely to hit Earth (if you are standing on Earth), and 98% to never ever hit anything, because in most directions, there is nothing until "the end" of the universe. (98% is from memory, cannot find source, also, of the 2% to hit a thing, Sun is most likely)
Relativity question. If I were to go the speed of light, time stops for me relative to people who are going slower than me.
But what would happen if I were to oscillate in basically the same position in space but oscillate at the speed of light? Would time stop for me in this situation also?
I'm not really thinking about an object like myself but I was thinking about all the subatomic particles. From quarks to electrons, All of these things are energy that I imagine is never sitting in a state of stillness.
And it is always moving then I would assume it would move at the speed of light regardless of whether it was traveling across great distances or in a stable position in space by oscillating or something like that.
So I was just thinking that if this was true then the very things that form all matter are essentially not moving in time and we are all constructed of this material which would almost suggest that in some regards we aren't moving in time...
Or it could be the case that the energies that make us aren't moving in time but collectively as more macro objects the macro object can move through time even though it's constituent parts don't move through time because they oscalate at the speed of light?
Absolutely nobody is going to answer this. And I can't find anything on Google about this.
I'm sure it's ridiculous but would love to satisfy the curiosity if somebody with expertise in this area could provide some insight
You know I really can not genuinely fathom the fact that there are people out there who truly believe it’s flat
These replies are out of hand man yall need school 😭😭
Keep believing NASA
@@gulfy09 Get an education.
Have you seen the globe proof on the series genius by stephen hawking?
@@qkqk6954 tv crap nope... they feed your mind with stupidity
@@primonomeultimonome wake up space is just nonsense
I love the intro 😂😂
We will always love you, Pluto! ❤
I must say Neil & Chuck that that was a really round about way of explaining roundness! 👍👍🤔🤔
I have a question: one that is often taken for granted.
If space has finite dimensions and everything in the universe is within this space, what is keeping all objects in space from falling to the bottom of space if any thing? Are celestial bodies free-falling or is there something keeping them suspended / buoyant? Is there a way to even test this given our perspective as observers in the universe? I hope you can answer.
Not an expert :), but I think that's what is referred to as Dark matter, and Dark energy.
Planets are round due to the force of gravity, which pulls matter towards the center of mass. As a planet forms, gravity pulls equally from all directions, resulting in a spherical shape. This process, known as hydrostatic equilibrium, ensures that the planet's shape is as close to a sphere as possible. How might variations in a planet's composition and rotation affect its deviation from a perfect spherical shape?
All the Flat Earthers got triggered by the title and that thumbnail pic.... 🤣🤣🤣🤣
love you guys. thanks!
Chuck and NDT 4 president and vice President.
Let's get that campaign started!!!! 🥹🇺🇸
Too young
He would be the worst president in the history of the us. Too full of himself
@@i.o957I like NDT but totally agree lol
@@Shockmeslow Tyson and Nice All day.
Best explanation ever
Flat Earthers are all around the globe. 😂
What a punchline to such a remarkable joke😅
Flat Earthers have StarTalk channel blocked because of comments like this lol
At the very edge of the disk 💿
dude 😂😂🙌🔥
This comment amuses me ahaha!
Man, i enjoyed this episode! 👏👏👏
I’ve seen a square bubble. Stephen Fry made one on QI.
I wish we can drive National Unity and Integrity through logic and comic like these!!!
Question: Does that make the Earths Moon a dwarf Planet also.
Three reasons the earths moon isn't a dwarf planet.
1. It orbits our planet.
2. Much smaller than dwarf planets.
3. Not in hydrostatic equilibrium (enough mass for its self-gravity to pull it into a roughly spherical shape)
Earth's moon cannot be a dwarf planet cuz moon is under the Earth's gravitational influence. There are 3 criterion for any object to be considered a planet:
1)The object must orbit the Sun.
2)The object must be spherical in shape due to its own gravity.
3)The object must have cleared its orbit of other debris.
For Pluto which is a dwarf planet it orbits sun, and has enough gravity to be spherical, but lacks the gravity required to clear and accumulate all the debris into itself.
-Moon orbits earth.
@@sketcher24591. True
2. Our moon is actually unusually large. It is larger than Ceres and Pluto combined.
3. The moon is spherical.
Yes. It's one reason astrologers such as Tyson rejected the committee's definition of a planet.
The Moon is much smaller than dwarf planets?
How can you say that when you look at the following examples?
Diameter
relative to
the Moon;
Pluto 68%
Eris 67%
Haumea =45%
Makemake 41%
Gonggong 35%
Charon 35%
Quaoar 32%
Ceres 27%
Orcus 26%
Sedna 26%
Salacia 24%
The Moon doesn’t orbit the Sun independently, the same goes for any of the Moons in the Solar System, anything is officially a Moon when it orbits a planet. Pluto is a dwarf planet but if it was within Earths gravitational field it would no longer be a dwarf planet, it would be a Moon
Love from India❤😊
some flat minded folks just dont understand the gravity of the situation
😂
Neil Just had to get them Round to this typE of thinking , this is science on a global scale
Interesting 4:30 without a heated core then, planets become ever rounder and ever smoother. Any planet you see with Rocky Mountains must therefore have a volcanic core
I'm getting sad bc NDT's hand is shaking a little and I hope he's not sick
I can’t wait for Neil to breakdown this CONSTELLATION show and this superposition visualization. It’s incredible!!!
1st comet….GET IT….??😅
I do actually. 🥱
Atta boy
Great talk
if the earth was flat cats would have knocked everthing off it by now.
Speaking of round, i would pay good money to see Neil & Chuck sit down with Ford's designer Jack Telnack to discuss why he designed the 1996 Taurus to be so round it doesnt have one flat surface on it. ❤
maybe in 4D or 5D were actually flat haha
Even pigeons are smarter than flat earthers lol😂
Because the 2-dimensional brains of the flat earthers don't have any _volume!_ 😀
@@fromnorway643 boom roasted!
Flat Earth Society would like to know your location.
😂😂😂😂😂
Near the edge of the
❤Learning something new everyday 😊 and more knowledge to know 😅
LMAO my twin brother is a flat earther and says Neil deGrasse Tyson is a globe earth priest WTF...he literally thinks globe earth is a religion..
Oh gosh. Soap bubble reminded me of my physics matriculation exam. One of task's was to solve how thick is bubble's film and how fast it's getting smaller and so how much does it take approx for it to pop.
6:09 Ceres is like Pluto's ancestor 😂. It too used to be a planet, in the 1600s iirc (with Juno, Pallas, and Vesta), then got demoted to "big asteroid" when we started to find more celestial objects in the asteroid belt and now it got promoted to "dwarf planet".
Mr Neil im a big fan 🎉please 🙏 reviews 3 body problem please Mr neil im from South Africa 🇿🇦
Glad to hear Pluto's Moon mentioned ☺️
The SLO Mo Guys and cold pigeon... Great piece! ❤