Yeah. The only problem is, we've been dummying down our youth w fit-in-the-box academics so we get a tiny % of those young ppl who will be able to carry diverse thinking fwd to prevent an AI revolution against the human race. If we fashioned our schools to teach at a self-pace and focus on fostering unique capabilities we wldnt be so scared of AI.
That is why I had difficulty envisioning going from high school to college it was like jumping out of the frying pan into the fire. I hated how the "school system" dumbed me down and forced me into the box...
You dont need AI for innovation. Although, it would not hurt. Look at who is not raising their voice to be heard. Listen to those who have not been listened to.
I have said for years that automation (& now AI) that merely mimics a human operator is the dumbest automation possible. It's like setting up the bouncing woodpecker to keep pressing a key.. when the "true" solution is to find the system that needs the input and re-program the service to account for that need. The vast majority of today's human jobs exist merely because no-one has bothered to re-write a more effective service. Wasting resources on mimicking a human only exacerbates our wealth divide since it solidifies the current economic model while removing the ability of the average human to participate in it. (Any IT worker who's ever wanted to fix a bug in a program but can't get downtime to roll out the fix knows what I mean by solidifying the problem.) We ***_have_*** to set AI to work at redesigning our assumed defaults, dreaming up new systems of operation, something like AI-controlled agriculture that doesn't need a salary and can thus provide all the world's food literally for free. Find the points of greatest potential benefit and even if the AI itself can't fix the problem, it might at least tell us where to focus our energies.
Uno de los peores ted talks que he visto. Básicamente este hombre se dio cuenta que el problema de la alineación es el más importante de nuestro tiempo y luego pensó en toda la atención pública que podría recibir al llevarle la contraria. En el fondo este hombre no está interesado en problemas ni en soluciones sino en toda la atención que pueda conseguir para sí mismo al llevar la contraria.
Yeah. The only problem is, we've been dummying down our youth w fit-in-the-box academics so we get a tiny % of those young ppl who will be able to carry diverse thinking fwd to prevent an AI revolution against the human race. If we fashioned our schools to teach at a self-pace and focus on fostering unique capabilities we wldnt be so scared of AI.
this is the only intelligent comment in this whole comment section
That is why I had difficulty envisioning going from high school to college it was like jumping out of the frying pan into the fire. I hated how the "school system" dumbed me down and forced me into the box...
This is a very intuitive comment and so true!
This talk could have been broken down to “The sum of the parts is greater than the whole”
@@hermantellis1139 Same. I never bought into it though. I rejected what was dealt at a young age. I'm nearing 50 now & things are making sense.
The fastest 14 minute and 7 seconds I’ve experienced in a long time!
Interesting.
I agree … Being mocked suuuucks!!!!
Nice
Great wow
Nice my boss
Proud of u bro❤
You dont need AI for innovation. Although, it would not hurt. Look at who is not raising their voice to be heard. Listen to those who have not been listened to.
JJ Watt became an academic
Finally
good
Great 👍 14:07
Wow
I have said for years that automation (& now AI) that merely mimics a human operator is the dumbest automation possible. It's like setting up the bouncing woodpecker to keep pressing a key.. when the "true" solution is to find the system that needs the input and re-program the service to account for that need. The vast majority of today's human jobs exist merely because no-one has bothered to re-write a more effective service.
Wasting resources on mimicking a human only exacerbates our wealth divide since it solidifies the current economic model while removing the ability of the average human to participate in it. (Any IT worker who's ever wanted to fix a bug in a program but can't get downtime to roll out the fix knows what I mean by solidifying the problem.)
We ***_have_*** to set AI to work at redesigning our assumed defaults, dreaming up new systems of operation, something like AI-controlled agriculture that doesn't need a salary and can thus provide all the world's food literally for free. Find the points of greatest potential benefit and even if the AI itself can't fix the problem, it might at least tell us where to focus our energies.
I hope the next AI is propelled by divine light and humane authority 😮🎉❤ 5:01
Try: responsiveness to human needs and desires. AI can't see the divine.
You can
Sea of Rust by C. Robert Cargill 🤔
Its caled duality with agarithum 13:01
Ai is going to help a lot of scammers.
Yeah
That's prime targeting 7:16
That's the name of the game reading
Algorithms reading algorithms😮 9:44
That's already happening 😮 11:26
As the inheritor of 108 billion human lives no intelligence can reflect my ability to mentally innovate.
Awesome reflection...but you've inherited some of those more than others!
wtf are you talking about
11no
AI digital world will dominated globally by 2025.
@DIGITALDECODED1.
1 st to be commented great sppech well done❤
You are insane
Uno de los peores ted talks que he visto. Básicamente este hombre se dio cuenta que el problema de la alineación es el más importante de nuestro tiempo y luego pensó en toda la atención pública que podría recibir al llevarle la contraria. En el fondo este hombre no está interesado en problemas ni en soluciones sino en toda la atención que pueda conseguir para sí mismo al llevar la contraria.
In the name of capitalism
CHRIST HAS ALREADY RETURNED AND HIS NEW NAME IS BAHA'U'LLAH AND HIS FAITH IS CALLED THE BAHAI FAITH. REVELATION 3:12..."MY NEW NAME '.
😂
.. god ain't real