Keynote Q&A with Maggie Haberman, The New York Times
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.ย. 2024
- Maggie Haberman, White House correspondent for The New York Times, gave the keynote address at the 2017 Christopher J. Georges Conference on College Journalism.
This video was originally recorded by the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard on March 31, 2017.
Put your damn phone away. Ten minutes in and she had to check her phone three times. Other than that, very insightful and informative.
She's magnificent.
She's Scum
Yes. You CAN write about someone you hate. Sometimes it is obligatory - if you have any sense of self-integrity.
Absolutely! Preferably, not hate, but you can write about people you disagree with who lie, cheat, and steal. Yes, if you have any integrity, you will write about that person.
After reading her new book. She’s going to be remember as one of the greatest journalist of our time.
NOT a great compliment, Buzzfeed & themarysue will be SO upset b4 they finish their next Armie Hammer & J.K. Rowling cannibal trans. exposes!
To an outsider, like me, watching the political events in America, the overriding impression is mayhem on a level which equates to kindergarteners squabbling over territory in the sand pit. Refreshing to hear the opinions of a clear eyed grown up from that good example of a benighted country.
Do not overestimate the intelligence of the average American.
@@kpokpojiji Thank you. I have been, I have seen.
Love Maggie!
Yeah because the lady who just said about Trump, Sean Spicer & KellyAnne Conway in response to a question about their constant lying…
“The term gaslighting has become so overused it’s become a little tedious”..
So loveable. 🥰So brave. I mean who would stickup for liars if not Maggie Haberman right! Just love that Maggie!
An American with a thought full brain!! I am buying her book. this is not a plug, this is Raaghav Sharma
Thank goodness for folks like Maggie Haberman, Kara Swisher and Scott Galloway. Still reporting the unadulterated truths even at their own risk. IF our democracy survives, but it's not looking good at the moment, we will all owe folks like Ms. Haberman a huge debt of gratitude. Sadly, we're Americans so we are rarely grateful for or about anyone or anything.
...an American Journalist is still American...Freedom of the Press allows an American view to be disseminated from one American to fellow Americans...one can not be neutral to a position of irrationality...
Life is a Wonderful Opportunity and An Amazing Journey ❤️.It must be Appreciated And Celebrated Happily, Hopefully And Abundantly.
Back in the 80s republicans second coming of Christ said that when he’s wounded he likes to wound others to make himself feel better. He also said he considered himself extremely thin skinned. The saint even cheated a kid at golf.
No Maggie it’s not gender based when people call out KellyAnne Conway for being a pathological liar. If she’s out there more than most/ as she was at the time/ then people are going to call her out and it’s not because she’s a woman.
I know you like to have that said about you from your defenders that the hate Maggie gets is gender biased-even tho it’s so obviously not & based upon your ethics in journalism. As a woman I find it gross when a woman gets piled up on unfairly but I find it even worse when a woman gets legitimate criticism but refuses to hear it & deflects it as a gender thing.
It’s Cheap Maggie & should be beneath you.
How many comments were made about her appearance? Marriage? Husband? Children? Family?
Delicious...
I love Maggie. There's nothing more attractive than intelligence, but covering Trump is the one thing where I disagree with her.
Her attempt to treat him "fairly" sticks out in a way that seems unnatural and illogical. And, in attempting to find something good to say about him and to come to his defence, she allows him to get away with everything from bad behavior to criminal activity. He gets a pass, and his followers are reinforced with the notion that he's really just like other politicians, and how his celebrity status somehow outweighs his past.
The only president to have been impeached twice, to have been accused of mistreatment by countless women, to have attempted the overthrow of the government he once lead, to have encouraged the execution of his own Vice President and the Speaker of the House, and now sits awaiting numerous criminal investigations and indictments has no redeeming qualities.
And so, the _ONLY_ way for a reporter to cover him is by reporting the facts as they exist, and the truth as it's known. Every person who has worked for him, or had a business arrangement with him has offered us his reputation in their books and news interviews. How is it possible for reporters to cover such a man and remain neutral and without an opinion of him?
I really don’t know what is to love about Maggie Haberman. I see her as a profoundly dishonest narrator who has refused to disclose her personal family connections to the Trumps (I.e. her mother doing PR for the Trumps & Kushners) and her totally dishonest framing of Trump.
Every piece she does seeks to ascribe innocent motives to trump. Refuses to honestly report on him and often simply transcribes Trumps Lies with zero correction to push his bullshit further -like trying to give his lies the air of nyt credibility
Haberman has done extensive damage to the reputation of the NYT and she’s solely responsible for why many many many have cancelled their subscriptions
And I beg to differ- when someone sells their “intelligence” to a grifter- so that grifter can get the gravitas he otherwise wouldn’t, that is profoundly unattractive.
I’ll also never forget how Haberman had no qualms about calling Obama a liar during the 2016 election campaigns.
But when it came to Trump-Ms Haberman famously lectured others as to the gravity of a journalist calling Donald Trump (a pathological liar) a Liar. ‘Because none of us can really know what’s in his heart or head’.
@@cateellington6653 It seems Maggie goes out of her way to be fair, and that sometimes takes her in the wrong direction. She's said a lot about Trump leaning in his favor, but lately not as much.
There's that old saying about how Mussolini made the trains run on time -- as if that erased all of the bad he'd done. I don't care if Trump saved a baby from being run over in the street, he's still a creep and an evil person, and I don't say that lightly.
Browns QB Deshaun Watson was suspended 11 games, fined $5 million for abusing women... but Trump's followers made him president. Go figure.
Her job is to be objective, including hurting folks' feelings. She was more psychologically describing Trump, where other authors reported their experiences. She has substantial experience in journalism covering both sides of the aisle.
If you report on him in a neutral fashion, he is still going to look bad because he IS bad. And as long as you identify when you are offering analysis and opinion it seems to me that is legitimate reporting. (Imo, lying, misinformation, cherry picking what to report on, gas lighting, sensationalism in order to influence listener opinion, etc. ... that's not legitimate.)
She enabled Trump in exchange for access, and is excusing her behavior with false piety. That's why she kept her head down for two years before cashing in.
Since an ex-president is traditionally out of the spotlight, relatively, once they are out of office, maybe she could get a pass on waiting two years to "cash in" (your phrase).
@@patriciajump9511 She's a collaborator. Kellyanne was his Leni, but she's a lesser magnitude collaborator, nonetheless.
Maggie Haberman is the lookalike or maybe related to Emma Luchini. Are they sisters or mother / daughter ????
Hów can thís reporter talk about Clinton and Obama and sóméhów çompare them to Trump This is definitely a false eqyivalrnt
Got it!She is news?I saw the local newspaper lie all the time.And there was money in it back then.All my cholo friends were doing it,and they never got it right.
Lol…Maggie Haberman pontificating on branding, withholding bias and lying/truth is too funny.
We're all so glad that you're entertained.
Believe me...
Agree 100% Stephen
Right? This is truly Idiocracy. Maggie is Trumps nyt mouthpiece but uses the Alan Dershowitz approach: Demand that in fact you’re a Liberal Democrat on TV while defending every despicable Trump Republican criminal.
Maggie here pretends she’s a journalist who writes unbiased pieces better than anyone while in truth writing nothing but Trump puff pieces & why Trumps legal troubles are bad for Democrats in the Midterms.
🙄
What a woman! Just amazing!
Super funny how biased she is even though she pretends not to be.
Wow how wrong she was. Let’s Go Brandon
Yes, she missed the whole criminal aspect and treasonous nature of that cockroach trump.
@@davidtrindle6473 does this make you feel good to comment that David? You’ve lost sir. Your party is eating itself alive.
I just took an epic Maggie Haberman 💩🚽
This woman is soon uugggle she has to be a Democrat
What you just said makes you hideous
Oy! When a Jew responds to a question with a story:
It's gonna take a quantum leap to forgive a characters
assault on decency.
Namely; the character is unplugged and hence; insane.
She is so attractive.