Crazy to think how primitive all these robots are - the first ones are barely 30 years old and were made in the lifetime of most viewers. I imagine this is kind of what airplanes felt like in the 1920’s. If history is any guide, these aquatic drones are going to get A LOT better in the next 10-20 years.
As the First World War accelerated aircraft development, so the Ukraine war is accelerating drone development in the air and at sea. Future wars will contribute too. This will eventually result in improvements in civilian technology as with aviation post WW1 & 2. Interesting stuff. All the best. 🐟
WWI saw many innovations, some of which spilled into peace-time, but human civilization will never be what it could have been were the World Wars averted. I know this sounds like a truism, but let me break it down further: It's simply impossible for us to recover ourselves, or imagine recovering ourselves, from something so titanically iniquitous as WORLD WAR, nor is it even possible to imagine a different outcome at this point. A climate of open-mindedness was emerging (at least in Europe) right before WWI that I fear we may never experience again as a species. There was an optimism at play at that point in history, culturally speaking, which would have been able to overcome all the vices we now associate with nihilism caused by constant warfare and maintenance of standing armies. The world would have continued to be multipolar, would have simply slowly moved away from colonialism. The concentration of power in the old nobility would have inevitably eroded, was already eroding, regardless of the World Wars, and even the human population might have grown at a slower rate, had there not been the threat and reality of so many of us dying in such a short amount of time due to not only conventional warfare, but nuclear warfare. Humanity lost about 100 million people due to these completely unnecessary wars, and several governments continue to argue that low birthrates are a threat threat to national security. I wish I could communicate what I mean. @@ivancho5854
@@josephyoung6749 Sadly everything you say is true. I have been all over Europe and today in every single country I see the scars of the First and Second World Wars and the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe. The loss was unimaginable in scale and its impact continues. My mother had to be dug out of her house as a child and it is by sheer luck that I am able to converse with you now. A quarter of the men in my family died in WW1. Although they were not inevitable I think that biggest factor in Europe not continuing the pattern of the preceding centuries was the development of nuclear weapons, though that hasn't stopped war from returning to Europe in Ukraine. Unfortunately the devastation of cities there today is again unbelievable. Go in peace my friend Joseph.
as the man himself mentioned, the problem is connectivity and energy/space/pressure/moisture-constraints..its hard, thats probably why we know so very much less about the ocean.. i wished i was able to study marine engineering, i always dreamed about working on subs... :)
when I was a kid, I used to go spear fishing in southern CA. One time I saw a large stingray in the sand. I tried to swim down to it and it vanished in blink of an eye. pacific stingray can go 30 mph :)
Veritaserum made a brilliant video about the insane competition in which hobbyists race robot mice automatically solving mazes, I'm convinced that there are people who would build better fish robots than all these scientists combined after having a competition like this for just a couple of years...
if the goal of the company is to make the fastest progress, they'd pay like a 100k prize pool. Not sure how well you can absorb the findings like legally
Lol this was literally my Master's thesis. Watching this video was like reading the background section of my thesis. I was looking at using piezo composites (called Macro Fibre Composites) as thrust producing fins. Cool stuff.
@bubbasplants189 instead of vortices let us imagine a pair of vertical rollers like a car wash. If they roll as shown, the fish will be sucked backwards. The fish could push the centers of the vortices backwards while getting an extra push from the rotation in the direction of motion.
power to thrust ratio! a very sfc adjacent metric. (specific fuel consumption) my personal favorite cursed units are lb/hr and lbf (pounds per hour fuel flow : pound-force), though not too relevant to underwater vehicles that can't burn fuel
can you poiint me to good references for schauberger, i am immensely interested in quality material about him. it seems unreal, but not quite too much to take it slighty serious. and the potential is amazing!
@@craigchamberlain1 only if you dont look into it! ...and that coming from a guy who is quick to discard anything resembling fancy bs theories without scientific rigour behind it. There is something there. According to my own observations about flowing water, as well as all the documented phenomena displayed by HO2 and some other compounds that arent quite understood.
I went to college with Jason, amazing to see how deep he has gone! I only did 1m and got out, it was obvious even at swimming he was a deep diver because of his metal skeleton! Proud of u big J!
Great video, but missing the best finned robots around, from Pliant Energy Systems. They swim beautifully but can also move over land, ice, etc. No other efforts come close!
One of the oldest submarine concepts I ever heard about was one. called the "steinhuder hecht" (pike of lake steinhude), it was supposed to conect a fortress in the lake to it's allies, including portugal. Something supposedly was built in 1772, but i doubt it got too far. It's not really known, afaik. Wiki article in english, german, spanish, italian: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steinhuder_Hecht
We are still a LONG way away from figuring out why certain things in nature work the way they do. The tuna and bumblebee laugh at our attemps to mimick their awesomeness!
see Viktor Schauberger. if only half of his story is true...theres an insane documentary from austria about him, water and its remarkable physics/chemistry...i cant remember the name, unfortunately.
In my opinion sarcopterygii is a clade defined by a common ancestor not a Paraphyly without tetrapods. A guy made some toxic comments so I had to clarify.
A robot battery powered fish if designed properly could be able to recharge its own batteries by anchoring itself into a water current by its nose/mouth /rod connected to internal motor/generator while body spins around it.😮 Just a thought, putting it out there. 😮
this is the least shady thing DARPA has done lately. though now i'm gonna have to add clunky fish roaming around surveilling the deep to the back of my mind forever
Nature deals with matter at a 3d-spatial level in which every point (or part) of internal volume within the animal's body works in tandem with what we recognize as the external form of the fish, or rather, the outside surface of the fish's body, which is essentially a 2-D manifold embedded in what we consider a 3-D volume. The human mind deals with matter based largely on flat diagrams, or volumetric diagrams that have been unrolled onto a flat plane for visual identification. Because we only consider the outside form, all the gears and pullies and even the fixed components within the body of a robotic fish, while serving the function of producing a thrust by the flapping of a tail or fin, don't work together with the external form of the robot fish. For natural fish, both inside and outside bodily forms were developed in tandem over long-time. In a very real sense, the functional internal components of the robot fish conflict in many unforeseeable ways with the functions of the external form, such as flapping. The components of a fish's body will be even more difficult to replicate in a robot the more the living fish's center of gravity and general movement are informed by the *liquid* components of the fish's body, such as blood circulating with the fish's body. The physical characteristics of these innards are such that they include multiples states of matter (solid, liquid, gas) and mediate between them with varying degrees of softness and hardness within the fish's body (think "goo"). I imagine this could be overcome with math and AI basically, since these mediums are so abstract, and since their abstractness permits them to offer a vision of all 3-d Spatial points in tandem, as opposed to the limited manner in which human perception isolates shapes.
Alongside computational models, there is also trial and error, the evolutionary process occurring over deep-time. This must in some way be reflected in the scientific method, in which it is possible to simply produce many, many variations of a form and test them out to see which ones are best. The problem with this is you could end up stuck in a local maximum of functionality and never reach the global maximum of whichever function is desired, forward locomotion being the function in question here with the robot fish. Neural nets could be capable, alongside other black-box tools, of accounting for this wholistic interpretation of functionality, by producing and testing models much faster than what we see over deep time with the evolution of various fish.
None of these types of fish "propulsion" is as effective as ship screw. It's the same case like by planes. Jet turbines are similar to ship screws. There is only one rotational movement along longitudal axis. No cyclic acceleration and decelation like by fish's fins. The only parts that wear out are bearings. Easy to maintain, easy to construct, lightweight. I do not see big reason of using of fish-like propulsion.
What a fluid mechanics powerhouse Applied Maths at the University of Cambridge, UK was/is! As well as Michael Lighthill, featured here, there is Sir G.I. Taylor, who famously calculated the power of the first atom bomb from published photos and Sir George Bachelor, who studied turbulence, a horribly difficult subject.
"Anguilliform" > Anguille > French for eel. Also, interesting to learn that Science still uses the weirdly childish sounding plural of "Fish". Even more weird, we apparently claim it's for clarity when more than one species is present....as if that makes sense 🤷♂️ IMHO the only correct modern usage of "Fishes" is in Italian-American slang 😉 Great video as usual man. Thanks 🙏👍
Do androids dream of electric fish? Not proper fishes but the jelly fish cuttle fish swimming technique where they use the longitudinal undulations thing but formed into a tube to create a water jet is the most efficient swimming technique. my bet is on the robotic jellyfish.
My guess is that we're going to see robotic fish like these used for reconnaissance (maybe, remote radio connection will be difficult) and as bombs (sea drones) in the Ukraine war before the end of next year (2024).
I'm sure if the engineers knew who you ARE, you would have the red carpet rolled out. Seriously, but not literally. Just freaking walk in with your 'business card' and you will get shuffled up the ladder
crazy to think the idea of needing to engenier robots that are able to respond to predators, like, isnt it basicaly a monster movie with extra steps? llkkkk
I think this wouldn't really work out for cargo shipping. The tonnage involved skews the numbers horribly to the point where you'd have to use incredibly large fins or tails, and you'd need to energy to move such appendages also. To say nothing of the trouble maintaining a moveable surface in a decisively antagonistic environment, the bearings, joints and what have you would clog and jam with all sorts of corrosive detritus or driftwood. This all assumes that you're not covering said surfaces with a layer or film of permeable high-resistance textile material or something along those lines. Even then, you'd have to maintain that layer, which would run up costs high enough that I doubt many shipping companies would be interested unless coerced by incredibly hostile legislature. And unfortunately the legislature will always rule in favour of the capitalist. He can stop production and logistics at will after all.
And now suddenly, in the future, we're going to be curious if a fish tank is actually full of live fish or robotic killbots Man china and russia are going to be so paranoid thinking that that school of fish could just be fish...or could be a cloud of fish shaped bombs
Crazy to think how primitive all these robots are - the first ones are barely 30 years old and were made in the lifetime of most viewers. I imagine this is kind of what airplanes felt like in the 1920’s. If history is any guide, these aquatic drones are going to get A LOT better in the next 10-20 years.
As the First World War accelerated aircraft development, so the Ukraine war is accelerating drone development in the air and at sea. Future wars will contribute too. This will eventually result in improvements in civilian technology as with aviation post WW1 & 2. Interesting stuff.
All the best. 🐟
WWI saw many innovations, some of which spilled into peace-time, but human civilization will never be what it could have been were the World Wars averted. I know this sounds like a truism, but let me break it down further: It's simply impossible for us to recover ourselves, or imagine recovering ourselves, from something so titanically iniquitous as WORLD WAR, nor is it even possible to imagine a different outcome at this point. A climate of open-mindedness was emerging (at least in Europe) right before WWI that I fear we may never experience again as a species. There was an optimism at play at that point in history, culturally speaking, which would have been able to overcome all the vices we now associate with nihilism caused by constant warfare and maintenance of standing armies. The world would have continued to be multipolar, would have simply slowly moved away from colonialism. The concentration of power in the old nobility would have inevitably eroded, was already eroding, regardless of the World Wars, and even the human population might have grown at a slower rate, had there not been the threat and reality of so many of us dying in such a short amount of time due to not only conventional warfare, but nuclear warfare. Humanity lost about 100 million people due to these completely unnecessary wars, and several governments continue to argue that low birthrates are a threat threat to national security. I wish I could communicate what I mean. @@ivancho5854
@@josephyoung6749 Sadly everything you say is true.
I have been all over Europe and today in every single country I see the scars of the First and Second World Wars and the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe. The loss was unimaginable in scale and its impact continues.
My mother had to be dug out of her house as a child and it is by sheer luck that I am able to converse with you now. A quarter of the men in my family died in WW1.
Although they were not inevitable I think that biggest factor in Europe not continuing the pattern of the preceding centuries was the development of nuclear weapons, though that hasn't stopped war from returning to Europe in Ukraine. Unfortunately the devastation of cities there today is again unbelievable.
Go in peace my friend Joseph.
you might have just defined my career choices. wow. thats something!
Nature documentaries are going to be insane if these things have cameras.
as the man himself mentioned, the problem is connectivity and energy/space/pressure/moisture-constraints..its hard, thats probably why we know so very much less about the ocean.. i wished i was able to study marine engineering, i always dreamed about working on subs... :)
Unfortunately, a lot is under water first documentaries are shot in aquariums
Still have seen documentaries with artificial fishs, crabs or octopus in German TV.
@@simonschneider5913 It can always just record it and send the data instead of it being streamed live.
@@kingkrrrraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa4527 underwater datalinks are horrible. The most efficient ones probably sonar. Its a mess.
when I was a kid, I used to go spear fishing in southern CA. One time I saw a large stingray in the sand. I tried to swim down to it and it vanished in blink of an eye. pacific stingray can go 30 mph :)
FESTOs AquaRay is much slower, but you have to check it out!
"Fish efficiency" is probably the most satisfying expression I've heard in a few months. You never cease to amaze me. 8)
Veritaserum made a brilliant video about the insane competition in which hobbyists race robot mice automatically solving mazes, I'm convinced that there are people who would build better fish robots than all these scientists combined after having a competition like this for just a couple of years...
if the goal of the company is to make the fastest progress, they'd pay like a 100k prize pool.
Not sure how well you can absorb the findings like legally
really cool to see the Asianometry deep dive on something small scale, although i love your stuff about chip fabs and industries.
The German word for guinea pigs translates to "sea pigs"
Lol this was literally my Master's thesis. Watching this video was like reading the background section of my thesis. I was looking at using piezo composites (called Macro Fibre Composites) as thrust producing fins. Cool stuff.
Robotic fish? The underwater drone warfare will be very interesting.
Cool, How about a deep dive on robots like you did for semiconductors: Unimation, Adept, Fanuc, Kawasaki, Abb, Kuka etc
Looking forward to Phish and Microchips 😂. Great video!
Growing biomechanical bodies with silicon brain or neural link control is the holy grail of robotics in my opinion.
At the 6:20 mark, I feel the vortices must both spin in the opposite direction for the fish to get a forward boost.
water goes back, fish goes forward.
@bubbasplants189 instead of vortices let us imagine a pair of vertical rollers like a car wash. If they roll as shown, the fish will be sucked backwards. The fish could push the centers of the vortices backwards while getting an extra push from the rotation in the direction of motion.
power to thrust ratio! a very sfc adjacent metric. (specific fuel consumption)
my personal favorite cursed units are lb/hr and lbf (pounds per hour fuel flow : pound-force), though not too relevant to underwater vehicles that can't burn fuel
bro is on fire. the videos keep coming
Viktor Schauberger figured that vortex thing out as well. He even made proposals for flying crafts based on that principle.
can you poiint me to good references for schauberger, i am immensely interested in quality material about him. it seems unreal, but not quite too much to take it slighty serious. and the potential is amazing!
Bit cultish.
@@craigchamberlain1 only if you dont look into it! ...and that coming from a guy who is quick to discard anything resembling fancy bs theories without scientific rigour behind it.
There is something there. According to my own observations about flowing water, as well as all the documented phenomena displayed by HO2 and some other compounds that arent quite understood.
I went to college with Jason, amazing to see how deep he has gone! I only did 1m and got out, it was obvious even at swimming he was a deep diver because of his metal skeleton! Proud of u big J!
This is what peak performance looks like!
I study at Taipei Tech, I was really impressed when I saw this fish in the pool
Great video, but missing the best finned robots around, from Pliant Energy Systems.
They swim beautifully but can also move over land, ice, etc. No other efforts come close!
If i can’t get tasty Sushi 🍣 from it I am not interested.
How else is a woman.... to get her daily supplement of iron.... ???
ISushi!!
So effectively everything in the sea is on the table;)
RIP all freshwater fish
Had shark meat (not fin) once in thailand it tasted terrible (putrid)
HI Sutton's covert shores has a good article on watercraft using fish like porpulsion, there were Soviet vehicles with that design.
One of the oldest submarine concepts I ever heard about was one. called the "steinhuder hecht" (pike of lake steinhude), it was supposed to conect a fortress in the lake to it's allies, including portugal. Something supposedly was built in 1772, but i doubt it got too far. It's not really known, afaik.
Wiki article in english, german, spanish, italian:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steinhuder_Hecht
H I Sutton deserves so much more attention, he is a brilliant analyst. thanks for mentioning!
@@simonschneider5913yup, he's the go to guy for naval warfare especially if underwater.
@@nos9784wow, I did not know of that vehicle before. Thanks for sharing the link.
@@shaider1982 that why i had to compliment your idea to introduce him to this audience! :)
Looks like a fish, moves like a fish, steers like a cow
I'd be willing to bet a research team at a university does not have money to be throwing around at anyone, much less a naming consultant
Give it a few years and robot birds will be watching us
Babe come home, new Asianometry dropped
Imagine going fishing only to reel in one of these.
It's 2023, computers can think, and submarines can swim. Eat that, Dijkstra!
Finally finished watching the video and this video is nuts. good job
Another banger video! Never knew there was so much about robot fish!
We are still a LONG way away from figuring out why certain things in nature work the way they do. The tuna and bumblebee laugh at our attemps to mimick their awesomeness!
see Viktor Schauberger. if only half of his story is true...theres an insane documentary from austria about him, water and its remarkable physics/chemistry...i cant remember the name, unfortunately.
Another application would be to find low noise propulsion methods for submarines. Makes them harder to detect.
Tentacles ➡️ barely controlled laughter
amazing topic! thank you so much for the video
One of the best videos that you saw. Keep up with this kind of video instead of technology history
couldn't they also be used for stealthy torpedos aimed at fixed targets like bridges?
Now you've got me interested! 😂
Slava Ukraine. 🇺🇦🇬🇧
bro called the fish sensual
Ahh I see markdown written script (the header popped up in the caption). I see you're a man of culture :)
truly, this is the pike of robotics engineering
Not what I was expecting from this channel. Superb. as usual.
Dolphins are bone-lobed fish (Sarcopterygii).
In my opinion sarcopterygii is a clade defined by a common ancestor not a Paraphyly without tetrapods. A guy made some toxic comments so I had to clarify.
Turns out it wasn't birds, it was fish that are government drones
Fish? Feh, they need to swim like squid
They had a fish drive in Seaquest
amazing fish pictures my friend
for amiiform swimming check out the velox robot, it's somewhat of a mix between amiiform, gymnotiform and rajiform.
Just keep swimming, just keep swimming
3:07 We Vietnamese also compare dolphins to pigs.
A robot battery powered fish if designed properly could be able to recharge its own batteries by anchoring itself into a water current by its nose/mouth /rod connected to internal motor/generator while body spins around it.😮
Just a thought, putting it out there. 😮
3:07 吳 陸璣 《毛詩草木鳥獸蟲魚疏》：「《魚服》，魚獸之皮也。魚獸似豬，東海有之，一名『魚貍。』其 皮背上斑文，腹下純青，今以為弓鞬步叉者也。」
《山海經》郭璞注曰：「今海中有海狶，體如魚，頭似豬。」
this is the least shady thing DARPA has done lately.
though now i'm gonna have to add clunky fish roaming around surveilling the deep to the back of my mind forever
sea pig? That's so precious omg
If the government can turn all birds into drones, I don't see why they should have any trouble doing it to the fish too. /s
This is exactly was I was warning everyone about: robot sex fish.
As soon as such a robot is capable to really swim like a tuna, all militaries will line up to purchase them en masse!
Very efishent. But does it scale?
Nature deals with matter at a 3d-spatial level in which every point (or part) of internal volume within the animal's body works in tandem with what we recognize as the external form of the fish, or rather, the outside surface of the fish's body, which is essentially a 2-D manifold embedded in what we consider a 3-D volume. The human mind deals with matter based largely on flat diagrams, or volumetric diagrams that have been unrolled onto a flat plane for visual identification.
Because we only consider the outside form, all the gears and pullies and even the fixed components within the body of a robotic fish, while serving the function of producing a thrust by the flapping of a tail or fin, don't work together with the external form of the robot fish. For natural fish, both inside and outside bodily forms were developed in tandem over long-time. In a very real sense, the functional internal components of the robot fish conflict in many unforeseeable ways with the functions of the external form, such as flapping.
The components of a fish's body will be even more difficult to replicate in a robot the more the living fish's center of gravity and general movement are informed by the *liquid* components of the fish's body, such as blood circulating with the fish's body. The physical characteristics of these innards are such that they include multiples states of matter (solid, liquid, gas) and mediate between them with varying degrees of softness and hardness within the fish's body (think "goo"). I imagine this could be overcome with math and AI basically, since these mediums are so abstract, and since their abstractness permits them to offer a vision of all 3-d Spatial points in tandem, as opposed to the limited manner in which human perception isolates shapes.
Alongside computational models, there is also trial and error, the evolutionary process occurring over deep-time. This must in some way be reflected in the scientific method, in which it is possible to simply produce many, many variations of a form and test them out to see which ones are best. The problem with this is you could end up stuck in a local maximum of functionality and never reach the global maximum of whichever function is desired, forward locomotion being the function in question here with the robot fish. Neural nets could be capable, alongside other black-box tools, of accounting for this wholistic interpretation of functionality, by producing and testing models much faster than what we see over deep time with the evolution of various fish.
Maybe in the future we'll have robotic documentaries disguised as nature documentaries about these robotic fishes.
These would be hard to detect in, say, the harbor of Sebastopol.
You may not like it, but this is what "pike" performance looks like.
I love inventions that use Nature & biological structures as their inspiration for their devices.
My favorite asianometry video
None of these types of fish "propulsion" is as effective as ship screw. It's the same case like by planes. Jet turbines are similar to ship screws. There is only one rotational movement along longitudal axis. No cyclic acceleration and decelation like by fish's fins. The only parts that wear out are bearings. Easy to maintain, easy to construct, lightweight. I do not see big reason of using of fish-like propulsion.
So, rhey ptobably already have underwater fish drones hunting for subs
Bear wants robo-salmons ! 🐟
A fish’s effishiency 😂
What a fluid mechanics powerhouse Applied Maths at the University of Cambridge, UK was/is! As well as Michael Lighthill, featured here, there is Sir G.I. Taylor, who famously calculated the power of the first atom bomb from published photos and Sir George Bachelor, who studied turbulence, a horribly difficult subject.
"Anguilliform" > Anguille > French for eel. Also, interesting to learn that Science still uses the weirdly childish sounding plural of "Fish". Even more weird, we apparently claim it's for clarity when more than one species is present....as if that makes sense 🤷♂️ IMHO the only correct modern usage of "Fishes" is in Italian-American slang 😉
Great video as usual man. Thanks 🙏👍
Awesome! you are into this too!
OMG, it's a row-bot!
What are your other fave ships with "I" in their names?
Titan 😂
One fish two fish three fish there is no such thing as "fishes"!
This has military applications... I'm guessing that's why no one is getting back to you yet
stellar video as always, this type of design could revolutionize ocean travel.
Do androids dream of electric fish?
Not proper fishes but the jelly fish cuttle fish swimming technique where they use the longitudinal undulations thing but formed into a tube to create a water jet is the most efficient swimming technique. my bet is on the robotic jellyfish.
My guess is that we're going to see robotic fish like these used for reconnaissance (maybe, remote radio connection will be difficult) and as bombs (sea drones) in the Ukraine war before the end of next year (2024).
Great video :)
How was this comment posted 2 months ago?
@@gawainthedane3314 Patreon early post
@@gawainthedane3314 Patreon early access, as usual.
Robots that swim like fish
Fishy business
I'm sure if the engineers knew who you ARE, you would have the red carpet rolled out. Seriously, but not literally. Just freaking walk in with your 'business card' and you will get shuffled up the ladder
let's build a giant octopus kraken robot .
When are we getting fish robots to explore Europa???
Why no mentiom of the robot dolphins from edge innovations?
Other than that great video as always😅
This video would have been much better if you would have shown the robo fish actually swimming.....
Coil memory 4 eels will work
crazy to think the idea of needing to engenier robots that are able to respond to predators, like, isnt it basicaly a monster movie with extra steps? llkkkk
Could international cargo shipping benefit from the reduced energy usage? Currently ships generate a huge % of the global CO2 emissions.
I think this wouldn't really work out for cargo shipping. The tonnage involved skews the numbers horribly to the point where you'd have to use incredibly large fins or tails, and you'd need to energy to move such appendages also. To say nothing of the trouble maintaining a moveable surface in a decisively antagonistic environment, the bearings, joints and what have you would clog and jam with all sorts of corrosive detritus or driftwood. This all assumes that you're not covering said surfaces with a layer or film of permeable high-resistance textile material or something along those lines. Even then, you'd have to maintain that layer, which would run up costs high enough that I doubt many shipping companies would be interested unless coerced by incredibly hostile legislature.
And unfortunately the legislature will always rule in favour of the capitalist. He can stop production and logistics at will after all.
Sombody should make like a robot wasp or fly.
A video topic suggestion: The SEED encryption algorithm and past dominance of Microsoft Internet Explorer in South Korea because of it.
What's next ?? We find out that BIRDS AREN'T REAL ??
Nature have all answers... But we really unwilling to see it.
new bomb design
Sea pigs lol. that's great
GREAT VIDEO IDEA very interested in this video personally keep up the great work !!!
What if you design them after sailfish or swordfish
Thank you once again. 👍
The Chinese name for hippos is 河馬 or river horse.
So is the English name 😊
but can MPF reach the 86% efficiency?
ROBO TUNA
And now suddenly, in the future, we're going to be curious if a fish tank is actually full of live fish or robotic killbots
Man china and russia are going to be so paranoid thinking that that school of fish could just be fish...or could be a cloud of fish shaped bombs
Everyone would be paranoid