The fact that i could genuinely hear myke becoming emotional at the end impressed on me the significance of this product. I often find myself cynical about these sorts of things, but the way he described it sounded just like the way I heard people talking back in '07
All I’m allowed to say is “I attended the Vision Pro lab”. However I can let Mike speak for me. I 100% agree with the closing remarks. It’s phenomenal and only the beginning.
Your talk of being surprised about the eye tracking capabilities and using eyes as a control source was really interesting. It reminded me a lot of the hearthstone streamer "No Hands Gamer". He uses that moniker because he uses eye-tracking in combination with a foot pedal to play the game. He's said that his "actions per minute", or APM, is potentially several times faster than the average player. So it is really interesting to me to hear it confirmed just how intuitive and efficient that way of controlling technology has become.
25:19 "I did not know that something could detect exactly what I was looking at, so accurately". Any marketing guys listening to this, immediately got rock hard. This data is a gold mine for marketing departments.
If we don't stop capitalism from converting humanity into data to be analyze and manipulated, eye tracking will lead to layers of control we can't even perceive.
Have either of you tried out the HoloLens 2? It seems like the product most similar to this based on what you talked about, and I wouldn't say that it's at a level to be a solid consumer product. I'm curious to see how they compare since I've tried the HoloLens and want to know how the Vision Pro may improve on that tech. Overall these types of headsets are difficult to judge until you actually put one on and try it. The $3.5k price point is unsurprising based on what the tech is, but marketing it towards consumers at that level is very strange. The HoloLens was trying to go for an industrial/enterprise market which makes the price easier to swallow there, but it didn't really take off. I guess you gotta start somewhere though.
@@TwistedShrapnel The XR-3 is primarily a VR device (with a bit of "AR"), while the HoloLens is wholely AR. From what I can tell, the Vision Pro is trying to primarily be an AR device with some VR. In the VR areas, then yeah it's probably closer to the XR-3. But in the AR space, as well as other things like form factor, I'd say it's closer to the HoloLens.
To the 3d birthday pictures, is it really better if the dad is holding a phone in everyone’s face while looking at the screen instead of at the child to keep everything in focus. If the outside eyes are good I would feel that the dad might seem more present in the moment then with a camera distracting him.
yeah but you still can’t do good AR even with that, unless you have a VARIO that is 7k with a 1k a month subscription. And even then, you’re tethered to your desktop.
I have been noticing that Grey has been updating the thumbnails and titles for Cortex just like he did with his channel last year. And I kinda feel proud since I made a comment suggesting this on the themes episode where he could take what he did for his main channel to cortex and his other channel(s).
A tech show host on the radio was discussing the vision pro, it's basically a primitive version of the computers from Minority Report. Can't wait for them to be cheaper.
hmm technically it's better than minority report ....u can take it anywhere and the virtual image is not crappy transparent quality .....and it can augment anything in the world around u while minority report was like a projector basically
~22:00 Foveated rendering is genius, but definitely not made by Apple lol. I think Apple has done a ton more work on their pass-through than to just get overly focused on just the foveated rendering. It may be an easy thing to point to as part of the experience being great, but I think its one of the more obvious and simpler things they did to make their pass-through as good as it seems to have been described as
Multi-Res Shading since Geforce GTX900, even not VR games used it like Shadow Warrior 2 from 2016. If i remember correctly problem with eye tracking from other VR headsets is legal, something with permission to monitor eye movement. Like if facebook do tracking eye - no, no, no, my privacy. Apple do eye tracking - yes, please.
@@ImpleSpec bro, you can’t not be more wrong.😂 meta quest pro is using eye tracking, so what do you mean Facebook (meta) is “no,no,no my privacy”. Since when did people against Facebook using eye tracking?
Opticians have a device to read the prescription of glasses. That is likely what they used. Not a difficult device for Apple to obtain. Oh ok it’s called a lensometer.
How about disconnecting the battery to go to wall power source, must the VR headset be shutdown for this or is there some minimal internal power for a transition? Anyone?
With respect to putting appropriate cameras for capturing 3D photo/video on iPhones: the average human interpupillary distance is 54-74 mm, and the iPhone 14 is 147 mm x 71.5 mm. Doing this with an iPhone is definitely possible.
Eye tracking like that has been available for a while, Microsoft actually have a partnership with my university to use it to control windows. The hard part is tracking the eyes and head, which is easy if it's attached to your head as it doesn't need to track it!!
I actually remember when I was a kid, visiting a booth in the science and tech museum in chicago that actually had functioning eye tracking, it had a dot that would brighten the pixels everywhere you looked, so it would mark up the image you were looking at as a sort of map drawing. so cool!
hololens2 does it perfectly and the soc on that is way weaker ....other headsets can do tracking and eye tracking perfectly too this is not new ....the new part is the powerful chips and the high res screen and good quality passthrough
@@pumpuppthevolume I wouldn't say perfectly, the units in my lab at least, the tracking isn't great in terms of spatial resolution, so it can't tell what you're looking at between two small but close together objects.
@zak Morgan it's the same quality there is no magic sauce here did u see the spaces between the apps on vision pro it looks basically absurd I'm not sure why they will do it like that
Prior to listening here, I’d entirely dismissed buying one as I felt Apple were taking the piss with the price point. Now, I’m seriously thinking about it. Wow! 🐑
At around 31:00 when you explain rhe 3D videos demo that reminds me of Horizon Zero Dawn, at the beginning you get to see a hologram of a dad in a holigram call I guess with his daughter for her birthday. The way I imagine it is like seeing actual people but they aren't there. Thats creepy as hell. And now that I think about it, imagine horror experiences, seeing actual ghosts around... that could scar you for life lmao
I can't really fully articulate it, but AR is just something I will never, ever be comfortable with. The mixing of the real and fake, the necessity of having cameras to capture everything to translate it, the potential misuses, I really cannot see myself ever using it, and honestly, something as pervasive as 'AR Glasses' (not goggles-something people walk around in their day to day lives with) is a societal level deal breaker for me. I would be out.
The butterfly thing is a nice little jab at the Steam VR home environment. Stand on the terrace and hold your wand out, a butterfly will land on it. This is Apple saying, subtly, that they can do it too.
Still can't see the mass market appeal for VR. I own a Vive Pro, it's great, I don't see normal people using VR as a "screen replacer". It's too expensive, too uncomfortable and you're looking too ridiculous. I see a lot of people compare it to the iPhone, where apple also came late but popularized the concept of Smartphones as a whole. And I don't think that comparison is really applicable. A smartphone isn't really an involved device, 90% of the time it lives in your pocket and you don't think about it and even while your using it, you only need to raise your head and you're able to focus on something else. That's the kind of tech normal people buy, not a giant, cumbersome set of goggles that totally immerse you into whatever you're doing.
A better comparison would be to the Macintosh, which brought a transformational form of computing to the masses, despite being expensive and comparatively large. The first iPhone didn't take video, send sms, utilize 3G, copy/paste, possess a front-facing camera, or many other things expected of smartphones at the time. Over time its form and function rapidly advanced to make it an appealing device for most people. Clearly the same will happen here.
I understand that this is a luxury and first generation product but it seems so massively out of touch for Apple to launch a new product for such an eye watering price in a global cost of living crisis. Particularly with it being marketed to individuals and not marketed towards primarily businesses (Like the Mac Pros). Cool tech is cool, but mocking people by waving cool tech with an intentionally inaccessible price tag to 99% of the world is plain gross.
We shouldn’t halt the progress of technology during an economic downturn. It’s similar to the movie Interstellar where everyone is encouraged to farm corn and not look up at the stars.
@ErrorWays I agree, but I think that's kind of a moot point. It's not about the technology, it's about the price and the marketing. There's absolutely no way that Apples cost of materials is $3500 per device. I know they need to recoup the R&D too, but the lower the price, the more you can sell, the less the R&D costs are per device etc. So they've just artificially set it at a way-too-high price to maintain the perception as being the fancy option and rake in money, and if you can't afford it "oh too bad make more money". I have no issue with them offering this as a high end device if they had a lower end one at a more accessible price, for actual humans, or if they were marketing it towards industry professionals/businesses. Either resolves it.
@@Aggie4life77 I don't think it makes literally any sense to compare the impressive beginning of an entirely new type of device to Apples entry into a 7 year old market. It was also launched at a higher but not much higher than the general market for phones at the time, unlike this.
You could have done it in a single sentence mate. "I am mad because Apple it marketing something I can't afford to people who can afford it" Stay resentful. There is a reason the Apple board is the Apple board, and you are you.
sort of but more powerful and the experience is better with this vr screen but u don't have quite perfect human vision with it and u have a vergence accommodation conflict .....but for a 1st device it's pretty great ...and access to ios apps and so on
Hardware wise, taking into account the price, the vision pro is unremarkable, even a ripoff, but the software and user experience from the sounds of it is a game changer, and will shape the future like the touchscreen has
@Rokmononov the hardware itself is amaizing but it's very iterative, of products currently on the market, like the big screen beyond or quest pro, or index, which are around 1000 2000 range, so that's like saying an iPhone 17 which is 5% faster than all other phones is worth double of all the other phones
The Macintosh, iPod, iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch were all "iterative", and also revolutionary products that pieced together state of the art technology with deep intention and relentless craftsmanship to do something that none of their predecessors could achieve: being both desirable and practical for everybody. An idea becomes invention not when someone hands you a physical object that resembles the idea, but rather, when that object can play a meaningful and even transformative role in someone's life.
I would describe the experience of being in AR (artificial room) and still see people like looking at those realistic 360 background filters recordings then someone walks by and you suddenly realise ah yes the reality I can so delicately switch in and out of, what do you need human that walked by unaware of the emotional turmoil I had rejoicing at the fake hologram I just had I'm just trying to fully understand myke... Can anyone give additional feedback, I'm pretty curious
What problems does iPad solve that an iPhone or a Mac cannot do? People said the same thing with iPad. Apple now sells $40 billion worth of iPad per year
@@well7885 the in betweeny size, i'd say its purpose was pretty clear. I think that for private individuals this looks like a pure entertainment device. in which case 3500 is a lot
Not well, up until pretty recently most actually practical used applications of tracking for foveated rendering have not been of a substantial enough benefit
Jazzed for VPro. It's like Apple looked at VR gamers/vrchat strangelings and said "Market this to the opposite of whatever those people are". And it's good. This is a segment that needs to be taken away from the odorous periphery and given to well monied adults who want more than a disjointed gaming or social VR experience. It's the only way it will grow.
You've seen the Apple HQ? Doesn't it just look like the most overtly evil looking building? If I were an evil overlord, I'd spare the architect of that structure. They did good evil work. Dude, and they built it on the same narrow street as a hospital. That narrow street gets jammed easily, and people needing emergency services get locked up in traffic. I'm saying, it's functionally evil too.
Man crawled out of the cave, so that he could invent the VR goggle app that makes him feel like he's sitting in a cave while he "works" in his office. De-evolution complete. If the Apple people at the demo had instructed him to crawl around on his belly, he would've gleefully obliged
Question: what the hell are you talking about? It's like you just threw together a bunch of words hoping their connotation would give your sentences meaning. The absurd amount of dogmatic language makes this comment hilarious. And I'm not laughing _with_ you.
Despite being entirely audio, this is unironically the best commercial for the Vision Pro anyone could hope for.
The fact that i could genuinely hear myke becoming emotional at the end impressed on me the significance of this product. I often find myself cynical about these sorts of things, but the way he described it sounded just like the way I heard people talking back in '07
I’ve never heard grey so excited 😂
All I’m allowed to say is “I attended the Vision Pro lab”. However I can let Mike speak for me. I 100% agree with the closing remarks. It’s phenomenal and only the beginning.
"I DRAGGED AND DROPPED WITH MY EYES"
😍🥰
These are my favorite podcasts of the year
The moment I heard the announcement I got giddy thinking that Myke was there haha, especially after missing out last year. What a treat!
It hasn't even been 2 weeks since the last podcast 👀 what universe are we living in? Not that I'm complaining.
Your talk of being surprised about the eye tracking capabilities and using eyes as a control source was really interesting. It reminded me a lot of the hearthstone streamer "No Hands Gamer". He uses that moniker because he uses eye-tracking in combination with a foot pedal to play the game. He's said that his "actions per minute", or APM, is potentially several times faster than the average player. So it is really interesting to me to hear it confirmed just how intuitive and efficient that way of controlling technology has become.
25:19 "I did not know that something could detect exactly what I was looking at, so accurately". Any marketing guys listening to this, immediately got rock hard. This data is a gold mine for marketing departments.
If we don't stop capitalism from converting humanity into data to be analyze and manipulated, eye tracking will lead to layers of control we can't even perceive.
Hopefully apple will stick with it’s promise of privacy first. i.e. not allowing eye tracking except with there is user input like a click or a drag.
@@Fawstahthey specifically said in the presentation that all your eye tracking data stays on-device
@@SenorBigDong69they can't stop app developers from getting it and Apple doesn't support open source apps
@@HoushalterYes they can, watch Apples developer videos on how it’s handled
I used to earn a bit of extra cash at uni signing up for every Psychology expt I could including eye tracking and it was amazing even 20 years ago
I was so looking forward to this episode of Cortex!
MORE CORTEX!!!
Excited Grey is my favourite Grey.
Grey's giddiness is infectious!
Have either of you tried out the HoloLens 2? It seems like the product most similar to this based on what you talked about, and I wouldn't say that it's at a level to be a solid consumer product. I'm curious to see how they compare since I've tried the HoloLens and want to know how the Vision Pro may improve on that tech. Overall these types of headsets are difficult to judge until you actually put one on and try it.
The $3.5k price point is unsurprising based on what the tech is, but marketing it towards consumers at that level is very strange. The HoloLens was trying to go for an industrial/enterprise market which makes the price easier to swallow there, but it didn't really take off. I guess you gotta start somewhere though.
It’s a competitor to Varjo Xr-3. Not to the Holo lens. Vision Pro is not even in the same league
@@TwistedShrapnel The XR-3 is primarily a VR device (with a bit of "AR"), while the HoloLens is wholely AR. From what I can tell, the Vision Pro is trying to primarily be an AR device with some VR. In the VR areas, then yeah it's probably closer to the XR-3. But in the AR space, as well as other things like form factor, I'd say it's closer to the HoloLens.
To the 3d birthday pictures, is it really better if the dad is holding a phone in everyone’s face while looking at the screen instead of at the child to keep everything in focus. If the outside eyes are good I would feel that the dad might seem more present in the moment then with a camera distracting him.
If you think back to the days of VHS where Dad is looking through a Camcorder eyepiece, is it really any different?
@@brianmiller1077 I feel the same way. At least in this instance, the dad can help because he's hands free.
Finally a tech product that makes the 4090 look like a bargain!
yeah but you still can’t do good AR even with that, unless you have a VARIO that is 7k with a 1k a month subscription. And even then, you’re tethered to your desktop.
I have been noticing that Grey has been updating the thumbnails and titles for Cortex just like he did with his channel last year. And I kinda feel proud since I made a comment suggesting this on the themes episode where he could take what he did for his main channel to cortex and his other channel(s).
A tech show host on the radio was discussing the vision pro, it's basically a primitive version of the computers from Minority Report. Can't wait for them to be cheaper.
hmm technically it's better than minority report ....u can take it anywhere and the virtual image is not crappy transparent quality .....and it can augment anything in the world around u while minority report was like a projector basically
What is this now biweekly? I love it never change
~22:00 Foveated rendering is genius, but definitely not made by Apple lol. I think Apple has done a ton more work on their pass-through than to just get overly focused on just the foveated rendering. It may be an easy thing to point to as part of the experience being great, but I think its one of the more obvious and simpler things they did to make their pass-through as good as it seems to have been described as
Multi-Res Shading since Geforce GTX900, even not VR games used it like Shadow Warrior 2 from 2016. If i remember correctly problem with eye tracking from other VR headsets is legal, something with permission to monitor eye movement.
Like if facebook do tracking eye - no, no, no, my privacy.
Apple do eye tracking - yes, please.
@@ImpleSpec bro, you can’t not be more wrong.😂 meta quest pro is using eye tracking, so what do you mean Facebook (meta) is “no,no,no my privacy”. Since when did people against Facebook using eye tracking?
Opticians have a device to read the prescription of glasses. That is likely what they used. Not a difficult device for Apple to obtain. Oh ok it’s called a lensometer.
How about disconnecting the battery to go to wall power source, must the VR headset be shutdown for this or is there some minimal internal power for a transition? Anyone?
With respect to putting appropriate cameras for capturing 3D photo/video on iPhones: the average human interpupillary distance is 54-74 mm, and the iPhone 14 is 147 mm x 71.5 mm. Doing this with an iPhone is definitely possible.
“I didn’t like 3D FaceTime, it was too good.”
Mission successfully failed
Eye tracking like that has been available for a while, Microsoft actually have a partnership with my university to use it to control windows. The hard part is tracking the eyes and head, which is easy if it's attached to your head as it doesn't need to track it!!
Apple nailed both, you can walk around and be fine with the interaction.
I actually remember when I was a kid, visiting a booth in the science and tech museum in chicago that actually had functioning eye tracking, it had a dot that would brighten the pixels everywhere you looked, so it would mark up the image you were looking at as a sort of map drawing. so cool!
hololens2 does it perfectly and the soc on that is way weaker ....other headsets can do tracking and eye tracking perfectly too this is not new ....the new part is the powerful chips and the high res screen and good quality passthrough
@@pumpuppthevolume I wouldn't say perfectly, the units in my lab at least, the tracking isn't great in terms of spatial resolution, so it can't tell what you're looking at between two small but close together objects.
@zak Morgan it's the same quality there is no magic sauce here did u see the spaces between the apps on vision pro it looks basically absurd I'm not sure why they will do it like that
I want one of these so bad.. Probably a good thing they're not going to be available in Australia for a while because I can't afford it 😅
hololens2 has scroll when u look at the bottom of the window.....so pretty soon u won't have to scroll with a hand
Members only? ....
There's a few reasons why Apple products aren't the right option for me, but I have to admit they're doing some really awesome things right now.
I’ll wait for the price to drop. Ill buy If it’s under 2500$, anytime in the future.
Prior to listening here, I’d entirely dismissed buying one as I felt Apple were taking the piss with the price point.
Now, I’m seriously thinking about it. Wow! 🐑
Oh yo you’re in Cambridge - potential meet up?
I assume you mean Cambridge uk not ma btw?
The PSVR2 -has no games HAHAHAHAHA 49:45
It's 4am maybe tomorrow
At around 31:00 when you explain rhe 3D videos demo that reminds me of Horizon Zero Dawn, at the beginning you get to see a hologram of a dad in a holigram call I guess with his daughter for her birthday.
The way I imagine it is like seeing actual people but they aren't there. Thats creepy as hell. And now that I think about it, imagine horror experiences, seeing actual ghosts around... that could scar you for life lmao
WEDNESDAY?? W E D N E S D A Y??? AND YOU'RE THIS SOON???
I commend yall. I believe the term is GG, no re.🌙
Codex?
Imagine Pokémon Go with this tech :o
Pokémon Snap 💯
Do they mention the price at all?
$3499
1:05:53 MKBHD said the same thing. It’s exciting hearing the stuff you could do with it.
u might have motivation sickness when using locomotion in a virtual world ....latency has been fine since 2016
Imagine a ufo abduction simulation
The Apple Vision SE will be the most popular headset in the world, I guarantee
It'll definitely be the most profitable :)
new podcast genre: two dudes drooling
I can't really fully articulate it, but AR is just something I will never, ever be comfortable with. The mixing of the real and fake, the necessity of having cameras to capture everything to translate it, the potential misuses, I really cannot see myself ever using it, and honestly, something as pervasive as 'AR Glasses' (not goggles-something people walk around in their day to day lives with) is a societal level deal breaker for me. I would be out.
20 min in all I understand (apple makes glasses) VR is cool
The butterfly thing is a nice little jab at the Steam VR home environment. Stand on the terrace and hold your wand out, a butterfly will land on it. This is Apple saying, subtly, that they can do it too.
Still can't see the mass market appeal for VR. I own a Vive Pro, it's great, I don't see normal people using VR as a "screen replacer". It's too expensive, too uncomfortable and you're looking too ridiculous.
I see a lot of people compare it to the iPhone, where apple also came late but popularized the concept of Smartphones as a whole. And I don't think that comparison is really applicable. A smartphone isn't really an involved device, 90% of the time it lives in your pocket and you don't think about it and even while your using it, you only need to raise your head and you're able to focus on something else. That's the kind of tech normal people buy, not a giant, cumbersome set of goggles that totally immerse you into whatever you're doing.
A better comparison would be to the Macintosh, which brought a transformational form of computing to the masses, despite being expensive and comparatively large.
The first iPhone didn't take video, send sms, utilize 3G, copy/paste, possess a front-facing camera, or many other things expected of smartphones at the time. Over time its form and function rapidly advanced to make it an appealing device for most people. Clearly the same will happen here.
Yeah I don't think I'll be getting this.
Oh no, Anyway !!!
I understand that this is a luxury and first generation product but it seems so massively out of touch for Apple to launch a new product for such an eye watering price in a global cost of living crisis. Particularly with it being marketed to individuals and not marketed towards primarily businesses (Like the Mac Pros).
Cool tech is cool, but mocking people by waving cool tech with an intentionally inaccessible price tag to 99% of the world is plain gross.
We shouldn’t halt the progress of technology during an economic downturn. It’s similar to the movie Interstellar where everyone is encouraged to farm corn and not look up at the stars.
@ErrorWays I agree, but I think that's kind of a moot point. It's not about the technology, it's about the price and the marketing.
There's absolutely no way that Apples cost of materials is $3500 per device. I know they need to recoup the R&D too, but the lower the price, the more you can sell, the less the R&D costs are per device etc. So they've just artificially set it at a way-too-high price to maintain the perception as being the fancy option and rake in money, and if you can't afford it "oh too bad make more money". I have no issue with them offering this as a high end device if they had a lower end one at a more accessible price, for actual humans, or if they were marketing it towards industry professionals/businesses. Either resolves it.
They launched the iPhone in 2007. Literally the beginning of the Great Recession! Have several seats!!
@@Aggie4life77 I don't think it makes literally any sense to compare the impressive beginning of an entirely new type of device to Apples entry into a 7 year old market. It was also launched at a higher but not much higher than the general market for phones at the time, unlike this.
You could have done it in a single sentence mate.
"I am mad because Apple it marketing something I can't afford to people who can afford it"
Stay resentful. There is a reason the Apple board is the Apple board, and you are you.
So it's just Apples version of Microsoft Holo Lens, right?
kind of like comparing windows 95 to an m1 mac, but, sure.
Yes, almost exactly on a lot of the features. Though it seems software wise it's a little more refined, go figure.
sort of but more powerful and the experience is better with this vr screen but u don't have quite perfect human vision with it and u have a vergence accommodation conflict .....but for a 1st device it's pretty great ...and access to ios apps and so on
expensive af
Hardware wise, taking into account the price, the vision pro is unremarkable, even a ripoff, but the software and user experience from the sounds of it is a game changer, and will shape the future like the touchscreen has
Find an equivalent product for $3500.
“Ripoff.”
@Rokmononov the hardware itself is amaizing but it's very iterative, of products currently on the market, like the big screen beyond or quest pro, or index, which are around 1000 2000 range, so that's like saying an iPhone 17 which is 5% faster than all other phones is worth double of all the other phones
The Macintosh, iPod, iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch were all "iterative", and also revolutionary products that pieced together state of the art technology with deep intention and relentless craftsmanship to do something that none of their predecessors could achieve: being both desirable and practical for everybody.
An idea becomes invention not when someone hands you a physical object that resembles the idea, but rather, when that object can play a meaningful and even transformative role in someone's life.
Yow
I would describe the experience of being in AR (artificial room) and still see people like looking at those realistic 360 background filters recordings then someone walks by and you suddenly realise ah yes the reality I can so delicately switch in and out of, what do you need human that walked by unaware of the emotional turmoil I had rejoicing at the fake hologram I just had
I'm just trying to fully understand myke... Can anyone give additional feedback, I'm pretty curious
Here at 336 views. Yay...
In less than 10 minutes I am past double that
I don't know man. It still looks like a crazy expansive gimmick to me. It doesn't solve any problem. It's just cool ans thats all
What problems does iPad solve that an iPhone or a Mac cannot do? People said the same thing with iPad. Apple now sells $40 billion worth of iPad per year
@@well7885 the in betweeny size, i'd say its purpose was pretty clear. I think that for private individuals this looks like a pure entertainment device. in which case 3500 is a lot
Note the genius power saving at 22:10 was being done at least as far back as 2005
Not well, up until pretty recently most actually practical used applications of tracking for foveated rendering have not been of a substantial enough benefit
RAD
man people get real excited about new gadget glasses I guess
Jazzed for VPro. It's like Apple looked at VR gamers/vrchat strangelings and said "Market this to the opposite of whatever those people are". And it's good. This is a segment that needs to be taken away from the odorous periphery and given to well monied adults who want more than a disjointed gaming or social VR experience. It's the only way it will grow.
This is the single most snobbiest thing I have ever read. Congratulations and you disgust me.
593 like
You've seen the Apple HQ? Doesn't it just look like the most overtly evil looking building? If I were an evil overlord, I'd spare the architect of that structure. They did good evil work.
Dude, and they built it on the same narrow street as a hospital. That narrow street gets jammed easily, and people needing emergency services get locked up in traffic. I'm saying, it's functionally evil too.
Man crawled out of the cave, so that he could invent the VR goggle app that makes him feel like he's sitting in a cave while he "works" in his office. De-evolution complete. If the Apple people at the demo had instructed him to crawl around on his belly, he would've gleefully obliged
Question: what the hell are you talking about? It's like you just threw together a bunch of words hoping their connotation would give your sentences meaning. The absurd amount of dogmatic language makes this comment hilarious. And I'm not laughing _with_ you.
First!
What a long talk, practically saying nothing…🥱😴🥱🥱😴🥱😴😴