I would love to hang out with Steve and Dave they are the coolest guys on you tube made me appreciate unrestored cars people would call junk as awesome cars to just have fun and drive it keep up the great work guys always enjoy your show😁👍🏻
BLP offers skirted booster bodies to reduce potential airflow. Your two 1050 Dominators have a dry flow of approx 2100 CFM. I'd like to see what cutting those two 1050's back to approximately 950's would do to tq. & see if overall HP is retained. They're offered in a verity of OD's from .950 to 1.120 (p/n 5116) might be some more air-speed in your combo. Enjoyed every bit of this 21 minutes.
Pretty bold statement. Consider the Honda 50cc RC116, made in 1966. 18.54 hp, 16 hp at the wheel! At 21,500 rpm. That’s 6 hp per cubic inch. On commercial fuel. Just one example.
This isn’t the first time I’ve heard this block being assembled incorrectly at GM. Specially only the 572. I wonder who that one person is/was and I hope they are not building engines anymore 😂
You sacrificed 20 LB Feet TQ with cam swap, but gained another 40 hp. Regardless, you made some great improvements, almost 50 HP and 30 tq from jetting. Then 60 more HP and 70 TQ from proper assembly etc. The cam swap cost you TQ but gained HP so that Rod is so lite, you can forgive the Torque, the MPH is going to go way up. 132 HP gain over what you had.... Hang on David.
Is lite like light as in not heavy?Acceleration and MPH are always determined by power to weight ratio.Torque is a static force and therefore does not affect speed nor acceleration which is just rate of change in speed.
@@teknoaija1762acceleration is a function of weight, grip, torque and gearing, hp is merely a function of torque over time. Mph is more affected by aero than almost anything else and to overcome drag you either need to apply your lesser torque more times per minute with higher rpm or increase the torque and maintain the same application of that torque over time rate. Steve Brule even said as much in the video 😂
@@johnsjunkyard That is just rhetoric.Of course you can trick around and be specific but my "formula"was universal.yours isn t.My universal formula applies in all cases.even in space with rockets and thrust.your formula doesn t.Mph is affected by aero more than almost anything??!This is very general and untrue even for your formulation.Give me weight,hp and I can predict MPH quite accurately given there are no problems with this car.Even with acceleration unfriendly gearing,you reach about the same MPH.
Hell yeah man been lookin for engine masters episodes
I would love to hang out with Steve and Dave they are the coolest guys on you tube made me appreciate unrestored cars people would call junk as awesome cars to just have fun and drive it keep up the great work guys always enjoy your show😁👍🏻
Dhol-check for president!!!
Great episode guys
My buddy's car is called the RAT NEST,lol. There's one for ya.
BLP offers skirted booster bodies to reduce potential airflow. Your two 1050 Dominators have a dry flow of approx 2100 CFM. I'd like to see what cutting those two 1050's back to approximately 950's would do to tq. & see if overall HP is retained. They're offered in a verity of OD's from .950 to 1.120 (p/n 5116) might be some more air-speed in your combo. Enjoyed every bit of this 21 minutes.
My hot rod makes mayo. my wife says it taste like pool water smells.Wish it made 901bhp and 899ftlbs.
You have to love big block Chevrolet! Inch for inch pound for pound the best naturally aspirated engine ever made....
Bob Glidden (RIP) would disagree... 😲
Ask Bob Glidden... 😲
If you look who dominates pro stock today it's all big blog Chevy power... it's what they all run.
Pretty bold statement. Consider the Honda 50cc RC116, made in 1966. 18.54 hp, 16 hp at the wheel! At 21,500 rpm. That’s 6 hp per cubic inch. On commercial fuel. Just one example.
Chevrolet dominate the aftermarket! Blocks cranks heads i could keep going! Nothing against Mr. Honda! Louis Chevrolet was a great engineer to!
When you build an engine, are you not supposed to degree the camshaft?
Good moroso eliminator oil pan probably worse additional 30 HP
This isn’t the first time I’ve heard this block being assembled incorrectly at GM. Specially only the 572. I wonder who that one person is/was and I hope they are not building engines anymore 😂
You sacrificed 20 LB Feet TQ with cam swap, but gained another 40 hp. Regardless, you made some great improvements, almost 50 HP and 30 tq from jetting. Then 60 more HP and 70 TQ from proper assembly etc. The cam swap cost you TQ but gained HP so that Rod is so lite, you can forgive the Torque, the MPH is going to go way up. 132 HP gain over what you had.... Hang on David.
Is lite like light as in not heavy?Acceleration and MPH are always determined by power to weight ratio.Torque is a static force and therefore does not affect speed nor acceleration which is just rate of change in speed.
@@teknoaija1762acceleration is a function of weight, grip, torque and gearing, hp is merely a function of torque over time. Mph is more affected by aero than almost anything else and to overcome drag you either need to apply your lesser torque more times per minute with higher rpm or increase the torque and maintain the same application of that torque over time rate. Steve Brule even said as much in the video 😂
@@johnsjunkyard That is just rhetoric.Of course you can trick around and be specific but my "formula"was universal.yours isn t.My universal formula applies in all cases.even in space with rockets and thrust.your formula doesn t.Mph is affected by aero more than almost anything??!This is very general and untrue even for your formulation.Give me weight,hp and I can predict MPH quite accurately given there are no problems with this car.Even with acceleration unfriendly gearing,you reach about the same MPH.
Why dudnt you buy a zx632 makes a 1000 horspower one one carb come on guys its so sumple
These guys are funny but they used some Dyno proven real science