Pretty much anything that can make a wavetable should work, provided it can make a wavetable that meets the multipoly spec. I was surprised that the multipoly didn't like the 16-bit wavetable, though.
One thing tat WaveEdit does that OSS does not is allow building wavetables from a collection of single-cycle waveforms like you might be able to find for various classic digital synths.
Thanks, man. I felt like going back to my roots a little and went for piano tonight. Well, that, and it was the only thing that wasn't giving me grief before I went live. I guess things would have worked better if I'd remember to load the mixer preset! LOL! Cheers!
@@digitaldiezel5870 Excellent question. I don’t believe that any function requires the software, with the exception of adding wave tables, and other librarian functions. Using the software is more convenient, though, especially when trying to demonstrate how the synth works, or working with the sequencers. Otherwise, multi/poly is about as user friendly as it can be. Making any adjustment takes you to the associated menu automatically. Holding Shift and moving a control takes you to the menu and shows the current value without making changes.
I use Audio-term and WaveEdit for creating wavetables.
Compatible with the Modwave, so most likely with the mPoly.
Pretty much anything that can make a wavetable should work, provided it can make a wavetable that meets the multipoly spec. I was surprised that the multipoly didn't like the 16-bit wavetable, though.
One thing tat WaveEdit does that OSS does not is allow building wavetables from a collection of single-cycle waveforms like you might be able to find for various classic digital synths.
11:06 great opening track man
Thanks, man. I felt like going back to my roots a little and went for piano tonight. Well, that, and it was the only thing that wasn't giving me grief before I went live. I guess things would have worked better if I'd remember to load the mixer preset! LOL!
Cheers!
@@GerenM63live tv baby!!!
@ Yup, always a thrill a minute!
Are there features you absolutely cannot reach on the hardware but are present in the software?
@@digitaldiezel5870 Excellent question. I don’t believe that any function requires the software, with the exception of adding wave tables, and other librarian functions. Using the software is more convenient, though, especially when trying to demonstrate how the synth works, or working with the sequencers. Otherwise, multi/poly is about as user friendly as it can be. Making any adjustment takes you to the associated menu automatically. Holding Shift and moving a control takes you to the menu and shows the current value without making changes.
@ Great to hear! Mine will be arriving tomorrow morning and I’m not using a computer at the moment. Thank you for responding!
@@digitaldiezel5870 It's a lot of fun!