How can business survive climate change?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ม.ค. 2021
- Climate change is about to upend the corporate world through weather-related disasters, regulation and lawsuits. Can businesses react and adapt in time? Read more here: econ.st/3slTXIE. Film supported by Mishcon de Reya
Read The Economist’s special report on business and climate change: econ.st/3bbckJZ
Sign up to The Economist’s fortnightly climate change newsletter: econ.st/3b8FQ3c
Find our most recent climate change coverage: econ.st/3pQLYkq
The World In 2021: The world could turn a corner on climate change: econ.st/3pKmAgk
How much can financiers do about climate change? econ.st/3ocWhip
Why carbon off-setting is essential if the world is to achieve net-zero emissions: econ.st/3beMh4u
What are the physical, regulatory and legal risks from climate change? econ.st/3rREWOe
Can Jeff Bezos help save the planet? econ.st/38Xlbfz
Does climate change spell the end for Big Oil? econ.st/3pRpkIH
Why floods and storms are altering American attitudes to climate change: econ.st/358Zc4j
Read more about the past, present and future of climate change: econ.st/3rVggo3
Business and corporate will survive, they always do. It's the common folk who will be left behind
the day will will come when rich and the poor, the rulers and ruled, old and young will suffer the same fate. we are all invited to the great COSMIC party and attendance is MANDATORY!
If the people is left behind, who will buy companies' products?
@@bengarcia3827 what's the cosmic party?
@@robbenvanpersie1562 the end of time...death.. eternal darkness.
@@robbenvanpersie1562 thank you for inquiring, JESUS CHRIST IS THE ANSWER , HE IS RETURNING IN POWER AND GLORY.
Sounds like sustained economic growth is more important than anything. How about someone talks about changing the worlds addiction to consumption.
America goes bankrupt if that happens.
Greed and need for novelty is a part of human nature so that would be difficult
Can growth be called sustainable? Growth always involve consumption of resources so we would have to expand resources to sustain growth and surprise, resources are finite. We may sustain some continued growth temporarily by being more efficient and reusing resources but if you want to maintain growth, we would have to colonize O'Neill Cylinders, Bernal Spheres and Stanford Torus's and access the asteroid belt.
@@ev.c6 Who says America isn't already Bankrupt. The Trump presidency has added trillions to the national debt. The only saving grace for the US is that the US dollar is the world reserve currency, everyone pays to cover America's bankruptcy and there's nothing to define America's bankruptcy by.
Hi
I don't understand why businesses and rich people in California don't put EXTERNAL fire sprinklers on their buildings. It costs around $20k to install, but it will save you from losing everything. It gets activated by infrared cameras on the outside of the building that detect flames. That's what they do in Australia and it works.
Wasn't it in Australia that fires torched an area twice the size of Pennsylvania in 2020?
California already has water rationing at many times of year, fires happen during drought peaks, .... even if home/business owners turned on sprinklers and water happened to be available to 'feed' the mains, how long do you think it would be before pump pressures dropped drastically trying to keep up? And if fire dept's were trying to access those same water mains to feed their pumper trucks?
نعغعغغ
Brilliant ❤️ Praying in the near future that will be a requirement. California especially should hop on that idea. 🙏
Attitudes like "It won't happen here!" "It won't happen in my life time!" brought us to this point. 2020 and 2021 definitely prove us wrong in many ways. We really gotta wake up and work together.
2021 will definitely show us that global warming has stopped.
Eastern Australia has experienced a much cooler summer than before. Victoria and Tasmania have experienced summer snow this year.
China is experiencing a colder winter than usual.
The amount of snow worldwide is increasing rather than decreasing (predicted by climate experts who believe in man made global warming).
Please read ----- Global Cooling: The Real Climate Threat
By Vijay Jayaraj (American Thinker website)
@@zlee4019 doesnt work like that. C02 in the atmosphere will persist for 1000 years. Wait till we have a boe in the arctic. Watch the methane rise exponentially. Abrupt climate change is about to really take off
@Obby Zerk plenty of proof! We've have known for 160 years c02 has been heating the planet. You need to understand how fast we been heating the planet and the self reinforcing feedback loops we've triggered doing so
@Obby Zerk whats natural warming cycles have to do with anthropogenic global warming?
@Obby Zerk do your research on the PETM!
Big businesses : " Lets be carbon negative !"
Translation: "Let's outsource our carbon emissions to our partners be it suppliers or customers"
😂😂😂😂
@@alenpaul2523
M
It's a global scam.
While some comments have offered upbeat message to pressure corporates, I want to point out that there is always a way to bypass regulations, which is to move overseas to countries with fewer regulations or a lack of enforcement on those regulations. If anyone wants to condemn such acts, I also want to point out that if they don’t move overseas, those countries can build their own corporates to compete without worrying about climate regulations and have a clear cost advantage, while polluting even more, generating even more warming gas.
It's a global scam.
I definitely agree with you that the ways in which big business that avoided regulations and changing there ways and policies on carbon has been to outsource to other countries with less or no regulations. the things is that I think the video pointed out well is that we are way pass the point where globally they shouldn't be able to do that. as a global economy there needs to be regulation is place to stop businesses from doing that or we need to all be on the same line so business have no where to go to avoid the issue. it comes down to are we able to come together globally to hold businesses accountable.
So little talk about R&D, physicists, engineers, scientists... This video gives the illusion that solving climate change is as simple as having businesses flip a switch to "go green".
The climate crisis is an ILLUSION, just like the last one in the 1970's.
It's a scam.
It's frustrating to see world leaders uniting at forums like G7 & G20s and talking about this issue but never taking any concrete step. It seems like they come just for a get -together of world leaders to have some chit chat and for photo op.
It's because they don't really care.
they're smart enough to know it's a non issue
plus with the added benefit to them that it keeps the airheads occupied in the meantime
What do you expect them to do, ban airplanes and cars? They tried a lock-down and people are already on edge and ready to riot, even the reporter in this video had to drive to the interview location.
You should see what King Canute said.
@@kenvandeburgt1232 I kind of get what you're trying to say, but it's a poor analogy for this because the US Army Corps is literally trying to "stop the tide" by building a 8 billion dollar see barrier around Miami.
Amazon is the hero? Seriously?
More 👏 videos 👏 like 👏 this 👏
I definitely prefer these kind of videos to the bill gates advert we had last week.
No, it's all lies. You need facts.
Christ, this has The Batman in.
even batman is fighting for climate change
Al Gore needs me
Everyone’s a gangsta until global warming screws up food production.
Actually around 1200 to 1500 ppm atmospheric Co2 would be wonderful, it would increase food production enormously and global temperature by only a tiny amount (we are at 415 ppm now).
The world is greening and the Sahara steadily shrinking the planet has greened by at least 10 %over the last 20 years thanks to higher levels of Co2
@@peterjones4180 at 1200 PPM ecosystem services would collapse as a result of changed temperature. Your comment isn't based on reality. Be gone.
Food production is INCREASING that is the inevitable result of higher (that is more geologically normal ) levels of Co2.
@@peterjones4180 you don't have a clue.
@@brett_porter21 Really, well i notice that YOU have not justified that by listing any FACTS that supports your contention, i would put it to you, that based on your response, it is you that does not have a clue, and your response is typical of those who DONT KNOW anything of substance but object emotionally because they are BELIEVERS like those in religious cults.
not looking forward to sea lever rise here in the Netherlands..
below sea level and everything.
Dit sal 'n neukery wees.
@@dayglowfunkyjunky ech wel.
Nuke the rising sea
U were safe back 1000-2000 yrs ago with just wood shovels and oxcarts
U survived when it was much warmer during the Medieval Warm Period
look it up
cereal crops in Greenland
A difference of 3+ plant hardiness zoneswarmer than present day perma frost
@@NeonNion
Haha! Your comment killed me 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
My stomach hurts....
This was my IELTS question this year...
My IELTS question last year was about cyber security.
Want the truth ? It's a scam.
Well Thats what you get for Looting from Mother Earth.
Looting ?, hmmm is it looting if everything is still on earth, ? after all all the molecules are still here.
Interviewee: We lost about 17000 bottles of wine.
Me: sadness intensifies...
You probably won't be happy when you find out it's a global scam and you won't be able to afford anything in their future utopia.
Wrong title.... The right title would be how unregulated business and economy cost us the climate and ....per ende the planet.
The PLANET will be fine it'll just have some nasty coughs and sneezes at its occupants. So if WE ALL work to CLEANER energies and CLEANER habits (stop throwing garbage on the ground.) And into the AIR, WATERWAYS, & LANDS.
As Robert Llewellyn of Fully Charged TH-cam channel says "Stop Burning Things."
And yet nothing at all unusual is happening with either warming cooling or climate, thats the difference between reality and
media promoted propaganda.
Yeah turns out the destruction of the global biosphere and habitable land will be terrible for the economy
Twenty Five Bucks who'd have thunk it!
You do know that the discussion is just about average global temperature right ?
The global warming scam is what's terrible and killing people and animals.
I’m all about going green and I work in the solar sector but there is a group of people riding this climate change wave to fill their own pockets, the Paris climate accord was a huge wealth transfer from US taxpayers to fund other countries. We the US taxpayer will suffer while the rest reap the rewards.
Clearly you do not understand the purpose of this second human induced climate crisis that purpose is twofold firstly to pour STUPENDOUS profits into the bank accounts of the powerful capitalists promoting it and to achieve the transfer of political power from the nation state to the U.N, the concept of dangerous global warming was created by the club of rome to use as a profit center (and followed their identical promotion of global cooling) and to use as a political lever to enforce the provisions of agenda 21 which our governments signed us up to at the 1992 rio earth conference, you are quite correct in your analysis of benefit , the strategic geopolitical policy is to transfer economic power and standard of living from the west
to communist china and to replace the U.S as the global hegemon with china, the corporate socialist model in china represents the next stage in the geopolitical agenda of the group, and is intended to be introduced to the west as its economic power is deliberately transferred to china and becomes unable to resist chinas coercive power over time.
Of course china is simply the next nation to be used by the group for its own purposes just as they used britain and then the u.s.
The whole issue is 90% politics and 10% science the science is being misused to support that geopolitical agenda.
Question is how do we shift economies to a different performance indicator? Business must adapt to a different definition of growth, a growth that is not linked to $GDP but instead to increased peace, health (physical and mental), coverage access to basic human needs, oxygen quality, animal species maintenance, forest, water quality, etc. That are so many indicators we could use actually, instead of the one that drives us to a definite disaster in a world with finite resources.
Dear Quentin i suggest you spend a couple of years living with the Masai, exposed to the inevitable consequences of your proposed policys.
It's a scam.
Every generation has their great challenge of their time, this is ours.
Lets face it with dignity.
Really my generations great challenge was the human induced climate crisis of GLOBAL COOLING promoted by exactly the same players (the club of rome and the U.N), every prediction of disaster they made proved over time to be blatantly WRONG, and so far so has their current financially profitable (for them) promotion of GLOBAL WARMING.
You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people ALL of the time, but you cant fool all the people all of the time.
It's a scam.
I like watching videos like this. It reinforces my belief that we don't have a problem that needs solutions, but a predicament that needs to be faced. Enjoy the day while you still can.
There is no technological solution out of this problem.
there is only a technological solution to this problem. Or you have to cut the poor from the equation.
So far the paleoclimate data is conclusive , there is nothing unusual happening with temperature or climate right now at all, this is a NON PROBLEM.
@Elon Mustard Oh dear, sea ice is NOT constant, in summer a large mass melts and in winter it freezes.
Over time as global temperature shifts
from short term warming and then to short term cooling cycles the amount of sea ice mass fluctuates both in summer and winter.
There is NOTHING and i mean NOTHING unusual happening with arctic ice masses, at all.
During longer periods of warming more ice melts especially during the many periods in recent geologic history over the last 11000 years when temperatures were significantly higher than now, during periods of significant cooling more arctic ice forms.
I remind you that we were in a short term cooling cycle from 1940 till the 1970's , arctic ice increased, (so much so that in the 1970's the SAME GROUPS THAT PROMOTE GLOBAL WARMING NOW, wanted TO MELT THE POLAR ICE by sprinkling carbon black dust on it).
I remind you that there are global temperature cycles that run over different time cycles and intensity's,
the long term cycle runs over around 90-100 k years of severe glaciation followed by 8-15 k years of interglacial (the warm period we have been living in for the last 11000 years is an interglacial), (you DO know k=1000 dont you ?, i ask because you do not have much of a grasp on the science).
There are warming and cooling cycles within both glacials and interglacials, these range between 1500 year and 20-40 year cycles, the peak warmings appear to be on the 1500 year cycle and are usually much warmer than now.
attributable to human activities it is certain that at the very least much of the current short term warming is of natural origin.
@11:39
Only 16% of listed companies have disclosed their carbon emission. Contributing to how much emissions???
97 % of all CO2 comes from nature, so what's the difference what we do even if there was a problem ?
Nice video.
Mangrove trees prevent flooding.
Companies be like :
Let's cut them so people have to buy our brand new sea wall!
@@laMoria to be fair, sea walls grow better in Germany that mongroves do...... xD
You just don’t get it. It’s not about the business it’s about our survival! Wake up!
Fantastic video. More climate reporting please!
If you're interested in climate reporting I recommend a podcast called "Drilled" which is super interesting, and talks specifically about climate change and the oil and gas industry
Would you like some real facts about this global scam ?
@@julimart94 Are you interested in the truth about this global scam ?
meeeehhh!!!
It’s 2 degrees from the 1850 baseline not the 1970 baseline.
Chidi from XR was impressively compelling. Really important that companies lean into the climate crisis now, urgently...
How much more massive do you want their subsidized profits to be ?
You are really naieve and clearly know nothing about the science and politics of the global warming scare.
The UAH temperature anomaly is 0.27C higher than 1980. The projection is that it will drop further due to la nina conditions and possible PDO going negative. Right now the real fear is AMO will go negative too and we will see mini ice age conditions by 2030.
hello.thanks for giving.ขอบคุณครับ.
If we lose our wine-growing lands, millions of Karens will have to switch to scotch or start attending AA meetings.
We're gonna wait until it's too late, and then geoengineering our way out of this problem, leaving the poor behind and creating even more stratified societies. Can't wait for Act II
Taxes, don't forget added taxes.
this is closer to the truth than probably anything in the video. people do not care about each other. and they do not care about the planet.
The WHOLE IDEA IS TO LEAVE THE POOR BEHIND, and impoverish most of those who are not currently poor, leaving a powerful elite in charge, global temperatures are not a problem, this is a trojan horse designed to attack YOU and your children, your existence is inconvenient to the powerful capitalists who promote the global warming scare, the roadmap they have laid out for our governments to follow is designed to provide them with continuing stupendous profits via subsidies and selling carbon dioxide bonds, and a slow movement toward a dictatorship controlled by them.
It's a global scam.
Amazon can say they are carbon neutral pat their own back but, the people that sell through Amazon how about them shouldn’t they be considered a part of “Amazons carbon free claim”, I think so. They should still contribute to cleaning it up!
Letting them same corporatists and capitalists who got us into this mess trying to solve the issue is insanity. We need strong democratic governement put in place all the laws and restrictions necessary for most humans to keep a decent life and protect nature.
You ignorant fool, its the same ruthless capitalists you refer to that are promoting the false idea that there is any climate crisis, from it they are receiving stupendous profits.
2:21 Did you just drove in a benzine golf car?
it wouldn't have costs if they were sustainable to begin with
We are sustainable without the global warming scam.
Climate change has delivered plenty of rainfall across Australia since February last year. The dams and rivers are full to overflowing. We were told they would never fill again.
Each and every company / business whose carbon footprint is horrendously destructive and immoral will go the way of Trump.
Just blame it on your customers🤷♂️
Right
And what form of carbon ?, diamond, graphite etc ? you dont even know the whole thing is not about carbon at all, typical.
They'll just diversify and make more money than ever before. Big Climate is going to pay like never seen before. Trillions on the table.
@@thecrippledpancake9455 Blame it on the government for pushing a global scam on you.
@@kevinodom2918 Global carbon trading scam. Anyone pushing it is guilty of treason and genocide. Let's see that they all pay.
9:56 "Yeah..." *nods in agreement
MOOD
love your chanel but the problem is that you only talk about US, China or Europe why can't you talk about India, Brazil, Kenya and Indonesia for exp.? It is really intersting to see what these big bullies are duing but they are not alone in the world...
Why is climate change such as a big problem other than hurting Napa Valley? Please provide link so, Having problem finding one.
How are they doing right now with corona?
Businesses are responsible to follow the laws and regulations they operate under and make money under these circumstances. They aren't responsible for climate change if the laws and regulations allow them to pollute and the consumers largely don't care. The action needs to come from regulators and policy makers. For example if there were steep carbon taxes in the locations where these companies operate, then we would see a real change very quickly. Companies shouldn't be put in a position where they can make money but shouldn't because it is morally wrong. Because in a competitive market, such companies will lose to their unethical competitors. There should be laws to force all companies to make the responsible choices. Ultimately the responsibility lies with the policy makes and those who elect them (for example trump voters).
@Mr Brightside Government decide. They are the ones that regulate the businesses and the consumers that release greenhouse gasses. The governments of the countries that pollute the most are the ones which are most responsible for the rising temperatures and they are therefore the ones that decide. In democratic countries the governments are chosen by the people so the American voters collectively make the decision on how much they should emit greenhouse gasses.
In autocratic countries like China, Saudi Arabia or Russia, the rulers of the countries decide. China is the biggest polluter currently by a wide margin, so one can say Xi Jinping is the most responsible single person and he makes the biggest portion of this decision for the planet. If he likes it warm, he can keep burning coal and the world will never beat climate change.
But I don't think he or anyone wants that just to enjoy the beach, everyone agrees that on paper that climate change is damaging and should be stopped. But in practice it is always a decision about the political concerns of the deciding politician.
@Mr Brightside I think everyone agrees that changing the temperature of the planet is complex, unpredictable and dangerous. I don't think even the Nordic countries want to change the climate. If food can't grow in northern Greenland, then people settled there in appropriate numbers and those people are used to the way things are, besides most northern countries are rich and have small populations. I don't think they would want to risk messing up the world order by climate catastrophe, just for having more farmland. They are rich enough to import all the food they need. Also even if lets say northernmost countries wanted warmer climate, it would be hard for them to argue for it in a diplomatic setting, like the UN, since their small gain would mean a catastrophic loss for many many more people/countries.
I think currently the decision is already taken that we want the world to stay in the climate we are used to (pre-industrial levels or maybe a bit warmer), there could be countries like Russia who may think climate change maybe to their benefit, but I don't think you will hear them voice such opinions as that would be a huge diplomatic mistake. But agreeing on this does't mean it will get done, that is the big issue. Most politicians have interests that doesn't align with action on climate change. For example Australia, where the ruling conservatives support the coal industry and when they are asked internationally to do something about this, they simply deflect the questions. This is also because the international organisations and agreements like Paris lack any enforcement or encouragement mechanism, they simply rely on shaming the guilty, which is very ineffective to say the least. Sorry for going on so long :)
Oh and by the way GET IT RIGHT a carbon tax has nothing to do with Co2 they are totally different things, carbon is an element and a solid at room temperature Co2 is a compound and a colourless odourless tastless gas at room temperature.
Co2 is NOT the target of these policys YOU and your family is the target, Co2 is simply the most convenient mechanism to use to attack your existence, thats the real agenda this whole global warming crisis is a propaganda exercise produced and promoted through the U.N by The Club of Rome, who are the epitome of elitist globalist capitalists, they are malthusians, racists, and seek to create a high tech neo feudal society with themselves in the position of overlords.
Humans DO NOT CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE climate is constantly changing over time its a natural earth process as is global cooling and warming (we are probably adding some warming to the natural warming cycle but no one knows how much or how little) thats the reality, looking at the paleoclimate data covering the last 10000 years its clear that nothing is happening with global temperature or climate that is in any way unusual at all, in fact it has been much hotter several times in the last 3000+ years alone, as far as speed of temperature change a high resolution ice core series from europe published last year covering the last 800 years shows temperature shifts of up to 2.3 deg C within a decade, our current shifts are slow and mild compared to our recent past.
It's a global scam.
@@peterjones4180 Even just showing to as many Children as possible thwe schoolfriendly
Climate-Change-Coverage of UpisNotJump and Not-Just-Bikes will help massively.
It's a wrong title (and attitude). It should be "How can business help the planet to survive a climate change". It doesn't come from nowhere, and we are all responsible to cope with it!.
But cooperate businesses are more responsible in creating the problem.
What do you mean A CLIMATE CHANGE ?, the climate is CONSTANTLY changing its been constantly changing for billions of years, humans did not start it changing and we cannot stop it.
By the way, PG&E started fire because they did not take care of their assets. They’ve been busy focusing on programs other than maintaining assets.
excellent
Let oil companies who knowingly polluted pay
ครับ.ผมต้องใส่ให้เห็นในทุกๆคาแร็คเตอร์ ครับ.
What will happen to oil companies 😁
They'll move to the mars.
Perfect work!
Global scam. Wake up.
Replacing corporation practices with green jobs and new agricultural practices will save us all. We can eat our way out of climate change 🥬 2021 the year of veganism💚
👏👏👏
And going Non-GMO.
Save the planet, EAT VEGANS, it will lower the population and increase the average IQ.
@@peterjones4180 🙄
LIVE IS SO IMPORTANT FOR THE SOCIETY.
Another title could be “how much have corporations cost the environment”
Or more accurately how much profit has the environment (panic) made for the worlds most ruthless and powerful capitalists (its stupendous).
Another title could be "A pack of lies used to push a global scam on us."
3:50 "...has had two years of fires?" Don't you or don't you know? Why are you asking the cameraman?
"Now, every major entity on the planet has a well thought out cybersecurity program"... excuse me? What planet is this again? I wanna move there.. xD
Sharing will save the world.
1.5C rise by 2025. 2C rise by 2035-40. Not enough time, my friends, not enough time. And everyone, please remember: 1% in GDP growth demands 100% more energy! If it's not clean energy....
Already at 2c using a 1750 baseline
Lets say temp rose 2 deg c , SO WHAT, it has risen that much several times over the last 3000 + years, the whole 2 deg c thing is simply propaganda, that was admitted by the professor at the potsdam institute who quoted it, the IPCC wanted a propaganda figure they could use in press releases , there was and is no such figure so under pressure the professor simply plucked 2 deg c OUT OF THIN AIR, there is NO scientific basis to that figure at all as he admitted in the interview.
This is just simply selling you soap powder metaphorically, looking at the paleoclimate data its clear that there is NOTHING happening with temperature or climate that is in any way unusual, in fact our temperature movements are slow and mild compared with the last 800 years where we had temperature movements of 2.3 deg C in around a decade, this we know from a high resolution ice core series from europe covering the last 800 years.
This planet benefits from higher levels of Co2 and suffers under lower levels of Co2 we could have 1200 ppm atmospheric Co2 without much of an additional temperature increase its warming effect is limited and logarithmic, the higher the level of Co2 the smaller the additional temperature increase, there is a saturation limit, this is why we have had 5000-8000 ppm atmospheric Co2 levels and ice ages.
They dont like to talk about this but Co2 is not the main mechanism of the AGW hypothesis, that mechanism is water vapor , because Co2 just cant warm much, however the AGW (water vapor) hypothesis was empirically tested by high accuracy temperature measurements over a period of decades (well over a million times) by radiosondes operating in the equatorial troposphere.
The AGW hypothesis is that a water vapor feedback loop will cause dangerous atmospheric warming and that this will be proven by the development of unusual equatorial tropospheric warming a HOT SPOT in fact.
The hypothesis has been accurately put to the test and has FAILED the hot spot should have reached a temperature anomoly of + .6 Deg C a decade ago however no hot spot has appeared and in fact there has been a slight cooling, sensitivity is LOW the AGW hypothesis is dis proven , we are heading for NO climate emergency, and this has been clear for ten years, so ask yourself why did i not know that ?.
The answer is that it is not in the interests of the promoters of a climate crisis that you should know and so it is NEVER mentioned on most media.
Climate is simply mechanism to get the general public in the west to pour stupendous profits into the pockets of the originators of the climate crisis concept ( The Club of Rome) and to achieve a shift from the nation state to a supranational corporate socialist control.
This is why China is allowed to grow its economy using coal so that it becomes the greatest of worlds powers over time and simultaneously the U.S and the west in general has their economys sabotaged using the excuse of climate so that they cannot resist chinas growing world control over the next fifty years or so.
This is simply the practical application of the agenda 21 agreement that the nations of the world signed up to at the rio earth conference in 1992.
What china is now is the planned next step for all of our nations in the future and is just another milestone in the plan.
@@peterjones4180 bahaha you're believing the lies of scientists paid by big oil. You clearly don't understand what a greenhouse gas is. We're in the midst of the 6th mass extinction. The species and habitat humans depend on are rapidly disappearing. Once the arctic goes ice free, IT'S GAME OVER!
YES
There should be by law an Environmental rating label on everything you buy, from chocolate bars to cars. That way the costumer can choose where they want to spend their money.
@Mr Brightside There's going to be far more cost if more regulations aren't brought in. With something like this companies can actually use it as a marketing tool and it puts pressure on others to change.
@Mr Brightside Ah I see you're one of those ones. Probably think that climate change is all a big hoax and it's just made up, to take away your money and freedom. Gotcha.
@Mr Brightside Yeah ok, whatever you say.
@Mr Brightside this is what I am thinking about too right now. How do we pay for all of that without an active economy?
Nice video❤️❤️❤️💕
Change the caption. It's Batman talks about climate change
On the bit about replacing aircraft fuels with Hydrogen burning, if this is intended to be done at altitude, in Stratosphere, there could be an additional problem. When burned with Oxygen, the byproduct is water. Injecting water into the Stratosphere is probably not a great thing. Water vapor is as powerful a greenhouse gas as Carbon Dioxide. Inserting excess water crystals into the Stratosphere hasn't been studied either, I think.
Indeed, every unit of warming has two major parts: One is Carbon Dioxide. The second is warming from excess water vapor, because as atmosphere warms, it holds more water vapor and that warms things more. The oscillation damps out.
It's a recycled scare story used to push politics on us. : The Washington Post - November 2, 1922 "Report On Global Warming."
I think you meant Carbon Monoxide. Carbo Dioxide is what we breathe out and trees breathe in. Carbon Monoxide is the the greenhouse effect causing gas.
I would consider an electric car if I could afford one and lived somewhere I could charge it from home, but what is the point when, here in Australia, 99% of electric comes from coal (our own)….🙄🇦🇺
Great vid, thank you. The figure of 70% of emissions traced to 100 companies is the big takeaway. How many are funding climate denial? and how many are effectively writing legislation. We NEED to know.
What you really need to know is if rising levels of CO2 in the atmosphere actually affects climate. Show me five science papers that can show that it does. I have looked and cannot find any such evidence. Meanwhile the salient data does not indicate a climate crisis is imminent.
Climate denial ? really ? frankly i have NEVER heard anyone deny we have a climate.
Really Chris your very short comment just screams I AM CHRIS AND I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING.
You would do well to take note of Ken Van de Burgt he knows what he is talking about.
You need to get a clue, 97 % of all atmospheric CO2 comes from nature. What are you going to do, stop oceans from degassing CO2 ? Are you going to stop volcanoes from erupting ? Are you going to stop plants, animals and people from dying ? Wake up, it's a scam.
We're in for a fun next 50 years with political and climate conflicts.
pretty much. and all of them will bring their pretty new boom boom toys
Come on. You already asked this question. The question is how we survive ,.to the big tech companies and cheat. Products,.
Man made! We were warned more then a decade ago…nothing was done. No one was to compromise and leave the comfort zone
Even just showing to as many Children as possible thwe schoolfriendly
Climate-Change-Coverage of UpisNotJump and Not-Just-Bikes will help massively.
ขอบคุณมากๆครับ.และต้องขอโทษเพราะติดที่ ผมกังวลเรื่องความปลอดภัยของครอบครัวผม.ครับ และเรายังลำบากมาก อยู่ครับ
It's a global scam.
you didnt focused on HOW to survive climate change. rather focused largely on that they SHOULD survive climate change.
the title is on the whole... misleading
Guy at the end is cute 🙈🥰
Two words: Quantitative Easing !
In other words, printer goes brrrrr
👍
Objectively, COVID-19 was the best thing that could happen to our species, by killing us off, forcing us to stay at home and avoid vehicle commute and forcing corporations to react accrdingly to rules enforced by the government. The carbon emmissions have not been this low in decades! It might have saved us a few extra years to our lifespans.
Personally and effectively though, it ruined my life.
to be fair, covid didn't have much impact on carbon emissions as we would've thought it to be, unfortunately, we need to significantly reduce our carbon emissions.
The Mauna Loa data does not indicate any change in rising CO2 trends. COVID might mean 10% cut to emissions. Emissions are but 3% of flows of CO2 into and out of the ocean. The effect of COVID is so minor as to beggar the imagination.
Mass recycling is needed if we want to cut waste and emissions. We need to find ways to reuse and recycle as many things as we can instead of constantly extracting and consuming.
The best thing you can do then is go live with the masai in a hut made from branches mud and cow dung, so the rest of us can get on with living.
great analysis
What about powdered hair bleach is that bad for the water?
Remove the loud music / noise…..
UBI?
Economic death
The fundamental premise that it is businesses fault and that business will need to address the problem is false. Manufacturing of carbon intense industries has been outsourced to China, and they have been building about 70 new coal fire plants a year for the last 20 years. Almost all increases to carbon in the atmosphere can be attributed to this single fact. The United States has been slowly closing its coal fire plants and shipping industry such as steel production to China. The problem is not Western businesses, but China's industrialization and building coal fire plants. The real issue in coming decades is not Western businesses, but rather the developing world like India, Asia, and Africa. If they all go by the China model and develop coal fire plants, there will be little the Western world can do to combat climate change.
Climate change is NOT what you are really discussing , that is the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, this was tested by empirical measurement for decades and falsified ten years ago, the hypothesis is wrong and demonstrated to be so conclusively, so why are we still worrying about a crisis we know is not coming.
The real agenda is clear its the transfer of manufacturing to China and the building for them of an economy so powerful that it will easily dominate and control the economies of the west while at the same time weakening those same western economies by that transfer and making it easy for China to dominate them with the active assistance of the multinational corporations associated with the group (Rockefellers, Soros etc).
The effects you describe are NOT accidental they are the result of over 120 years of internationally coordinated national and geopolitical manipulationto achieve an agenda decided on back in the 1890's.
More easily than surviving politicians
If we want to significantly reduce C02 emissions then we need to significantly increase and modernize our nuclear reactors. Nuclear energy is the safest, cleanest, and most efficient method for generating power that currently exists. It is far safer than processing and burning fossil fuels. Current Generation III reactors are very safe with an extremely low chance of meltdown. Generation IV reactors are safer still, produce significantly less waste and the waste they do produce is safer. If we engaged in a large scale expansion and development program we could reduce global C02 emission by 75% in under 20 years!
Even just showing to as many Children as possible thwe schoolfriendly
Climate-Change-Coverage of UpisNotJump and Not-Just-Bikes will help massively.
Nobody needs to drink wine... the problem is cutting down natural trees to grow wine and make farm land.
Thanks to rising Co2 levels PLANTS ARE THRIVING THE WORLD IS GREENING.
The power companies need to bury the hydro lines not just string them. through. The forest
We need *right to repair!!*
Don't know what that is? Search 'right to repair' and learn about it now. Hold companies like Apple to account.
I know that's just one issue, but it's a growing problem that needs action today, for the sake of your right to own your possessions and for the sake of the environment.
this
@Mr Brightside I agree - as soon as something electrical goes wrong it's not financially economical to repair the vehicle because of how awkward it is to find and fix electrical faults.
So many mechanically and structurally sound vehicles going to waste...
We need to act now , but our leaders are in negation of that
What exactly would you have them do? Given their track record on COVID ... useless lockdowns masks etc ... I'd rather they don't.
need a profession that sabotage the emission release
It's a scam.
Those businesses lost in climate change, what happens if they sue the one responsible for it.
Climate change is natural. It's a global scam.
Tell me how water levels will rise if the ice caps melt? Legitimate question.
My glass of water with ice doesn’t overflow when the ice melts.
That analogy is fine when talking about the Arctic ice cap (a frozen ocean). But Greenland and the Antarctica are islands/continents with ice sitting on land.
The ice on Antarctica is on land, when it melts it will flow into the ocean
@Mr Brightside "current rate". 20 years from now the ice isn't going to melt at the same rate as of now.
There's no such thing as green steel ... maybe top gun means BAMBOO😭😭
It is coming though. Since I'm from Sweden I know we are investing a lot in to our iron and steel production, since it's hugely important for our economy, to make it carbon neutral. The biggest thing for steel is to us hydrogen and not coal in the process. I'm super excited since I'm on my way to become a chemical engineer and these things like innovating new green methods of production is exactly what I'm going to help with.
@@BenjaminPersson awesome!
this video is very helpful. 🧗♂️
its showing an accurate and deep understanding; great perceptive. 💡
Muito obrigado for all the insightful information.. 🤝
It's a global scam.
Well done Economist!
Guy Scriven is such a cutie
We should change our ways and not let the climate change in such a way.
It's a scam.
15:00
First or so, does not matter
Didn't know batman work as risk manager part time
Lol
He will save us
This is the best video on TH-cam I've watched so far this year 👍
It's all propaganda pushing a global scam.
Solution force smoke scrubbers to be installed. On smoke stacks
Incinerate plastics and produce hydro.
The technology is here to do it. There. Is one. Running in Clarington Ontario with zero issues