Actually this is an extremely good segment of yours, I like the concept that perhaps what is going on with the Gulf Stream is that it is moving or may go into two or three different streams. That'll be less catastrophic than the next ice age, but it also could mean other things. Remember, we had a mini ace age a few hundred years ago, and perhaps the currents were different then. A lot more to learn
The mini ice ages were caused by volcanic eruptions, they can see this in probes taken and drilled from ice. In fact, these eruptions lasted for weeks and eventually led to the French Revolution since the peasants were starving for several years. Of course, there were other causes, too.
@@imlistening1137 The Little Ice Age, as it's been known, started in the late 1200's, and the effects of it lasted into WWII. Fording the Potomac, that iconic General Washington painting, was actually true, with large chunks of ice clogging the waterway. England had a Winter Ice Festival for centuries on the River Thames, the last one being in the 1880's (ice got too thin to support all the extra weight). One of the darker aspects was the onset of the Bubonic Plague. As temperatures dropped, livestock were brought inside, and the infected ticks and fleas found human hosts.
I'm a bit surprised that these scientists didn't check the accuracy of their data when it showed them the currents were slowing. If something doesn't turn out as expected, check the source and try again. Although, I had no idea the Earth's magnetic field had any affect on undersea cables! Keep up the great work!!!!
I dunno. Are these real scientists? Or are they more like Paid Professionals who insist that arctic snow deposits a foot of snow a year every year then are surprised to find a WWII plane in 300 feet of snow, or got their research vessels trapped in arctic ice that they refused to believe existed (3 times now, '10, '14 & '19) because their research 'proved' otherwise. This guy's still pushing "caused by climate change." Wtf does that empty phrase even mean, especially in this context? He's talking about climate changing "caused by climate change." That's utter rhetorical double-speak.
They have and they continue to do so. There's multiple monitoring stations -- the Mooring array, SAMBA array, AXMOC, the ICOS stations, and several others -- and they all confirm the AMOC has been slowing since the 1980s, not just the one (potentially) anomalous station referenced at the end of the video.
It literally happens over night. Studies show that coral reefs of Newfoundland died in a single season. The thought is that fresh water over the ocean froze and sunlight could not get through killing the reefs.
The same in Florida. The coral was dieing little by little and last year lots of it died in one season. The ocean temp raised one more degree to break a record and that was it. Most of the coral could take no more. It simply stressed the coral to death. It was on the main stream media news (ABC) but just a quick, little clip about it. Most people just ignore it. It’s crazy, the base of the food chain is vanishing and most people simply ignore it.
You should do a video on how we can turn the plastic around the world into essential fuels like gasoline, diesel, jet fuels and natural gas and solid carbon all made from plastic with the process of electro pyrolysis. There is a great young TH-camr by the of @naturejab he’s dedicated years to studying the process and to building his current machine that has been proven to create all the before mentioned products. It would be awesome to see you make a video about the topic and even mention him because he’s truly changing the world.
I agree with you but this can't be left to private business because they don't make money out of it and business do not take the environment into consideration. It needs government support to make it happen. In the US landfills are used over incinerators to generate electricity.
I appreciate your in-depth explanation of these complex subjects, especially things involving global ocean atmospheric and oceanic systems. I sometimes wonder if the slow-roll from the science community about what's going on is because they're kicking the can down the road until they get their data together, or don't want to panic people about what's already happening. Personally, I prefer to be prepared rather than scared and take a lot of what I see and hear with a grain of salt. Your show has become one of my go-to references in my personal understanding of what's up. Thanks for your work.
Sewerage water processed or not is warm water and dumped in the rivers and oceans. And sewerage causes algae blooms. The algae blooms create heat too. So we are creating stagnant water to be collected by the currents after seasonal changes. But we are creating too much of it along the coasts where warm water gathers. Even in winter.
This is why scientists don't use the term global warming much anymore, but rather, use the more accurate moniker of climate change. Some places will get hotter, and some will get cooler. Some places will get dryer, and other places will see an overall increase in precipitation. Everything from wind speed, as well as wind direction, to annual weather patterns will be thrown into an upheaval worldwide. Food production worldwide will definitely be affected. Migratory species will face difficulties, if not the danger of outright extinction. Virtually no place on earth will be unaffected. My kids are already being affected by such weather changes now, but my grandkids will really have their hands full. 😢 This is why we must do as much as we can, while we still can.
The climate always changes. The term is a political one intended to avoid the accuracy and accountability of hard science in favor of sciency sounding terminology, which is solely intended to dupe the public into greenlighting various scams and dubious power-grabbing schemes. CO2 as a greenhouse gas will warm the planet, in sufficient amounts. Global warming is the more correct term, if we're referencing CO2 effects on climate. But many of the effects of warming don't fit into a "crisis" concept, so the crisis cultists prefer not to address the topic head-on. It's all about avoiding open, honest, and objective conversations, where nuance and complex understandings kills the black and white narratives of crisis pushers.
@@samsmom1491 the world DID cooperate on eliminating CFC's. That is likely the reason we reversed the hole in the ozone layer.. That was a global problem with a global solution, a successfully accomplished global policy. If there is verified proof of a global issue with a verifiable policy change that will likely eliminate the problem, people can and will make that change. But the key word is "verified".
Fellow Canadian in California. Cape Bretoner born & raised. Yup, it’d be “normal” weather wise, but the grocery store shelves would be pretty empty bc where the food used to be grown would be in jeopardy. Sorry to spill the beans or lack there of! 😮
The Gulf Stream, part of the AMOC, is a powerful ocean current that carries warm water from the Gulf of Mexico across the Atlantic to Europe. It plays a vital role in moderating temperatures, keeping Northern Europe warmer than it would otherwise be at those latitudes.
There's an 80/20 rule, which means a small amount can yield a majority. Bet we'll find (soon) a small change in AMOC will result in a big change in climate/biology. CO2 takes decades before it begins it real 'greenhouse effect', meaning we are only just now seeing the impact of the 80/90s emissions, a hothouse burning planet guaranteed for centuries.
CO2 is still at very low levels compared to what it should be. It had reached dangerously low levels for plant life by 1850. Some researchers say this is what recently created the Sahara Desert.
Would you kindly consider including metric system measurements alongside your existing units in future videos? This would be really helpful for your international viewers. Thank you!
I think it's time that you people from the old world catch up to Modern math and learn how to use the imperial system. Your outdated metric system so "old school" We can't even understand why you insist on going with that archaic method of measurement. How long ago did Roman numerals become irrelevant? But we still hold on to metric system for, I don't know sentimental reasons? 😂 welcome to the new millennia 😂😂
@@Schnook yeah I'm sure you and your peers have convinced you of that. Just because you have 10 fingers a base 10 makes the most sense, what a ridiculous thought
@@Schnook I think you should get your sense of humour recalibrated. Either imperial or metric will do, it might help you noyice when someone is being humerous.
Learn somethings people. Suspicious observers channel will tell you how this all goes together and fully explains the CYCLE OUR EARTH AND ITS BUDDY THE SUN are doing together as they have for millions of years we justnhappen to be the lucky ones for this one..ELE nothing humans do can stop it.
"Sometimes they take a bite out of humans...for research purposes" lol, i had to rewind a few times on that one, i got it eventually but it still sounds pretty funny
For this to happen, Greenland will have to have a lot of ice melt. It's lost some ice and the ice loss will likely speed up. But, once the ice melts near the coast, the rate will slow down. Melting the interior will be much more difficult. It's further from the warm ocean, it's at a much higher elevation since the ice is thousands of feet thick and central Greenland land base is at a low elevation surrounded by mountains, which will hold the ice in the interior. Unless a meteor strikes Greenland and melts hundreds of cubic miles of ice, stopping the AMOC won't happen any time soon.
@@davidmckendry7684, yeah, let’s all wait until all the ice in polar regions melts before we change anything. BTW, the Arctic Ocean is now free of ice right up to the North Pole by the end of summer so, yeah let’s wait for Greenland to melt completely… 🤷🏻♂️
Dont forget the weather getting haywire due to temperature differences and changing climate zones. These alone may make farming almost impossible around the globe. No more long enough seasons to grow food is pretty scary possibility. We can already see some minor effects, like whole USA under drought conditions... Or bathtub temps at Florida coast, where warm water should travel northwards, killing corals.
Wait until Campi Flegrei blows. And there are a few dozen others, and the weakening magnetic field, and the unstable sun, and a higher frequency of space impacts and airburts than we`ve been told. But the woke investors haven`t figured out how to capitalize off actual reality yet.
Yeah, the manowar sting sucks, even if only a little piece touches you. It's a sick new kind of pain. Feels like strong bee toxin ( I had that expirience too), and lasts all day long or more
Climate change has always been a natural cycle of the planet. Since the undustrial age we have sped up global warming and co2 emissions on a global scale in the air and oceans and land. Ushering in the next ice age prematurely is going to be interesting to say the least.
The rate of climate change happens in 1000 of years time frames and the one we are experiencing now from human actions is happening in about a 100 years.
Yes it does. However some of them are quite lethal. We can’t out run them. There is no hiding place. Worse still you can’t stop the Sun moving these magnetic poles around so that the usual order and routes of jet streams take on a different course. And it can do that fairly quickly.
It's estimated that the AMOC bifurcation point is at about 10 Sv but this doesn't seem to be a reliable estimate because I rarely come across it being mentioned. So if the AMOC deep flow drops from its 17 Sv to below 10 Sv then it will gradually over decades slow to a stop or almost stop all by itself is the (apparently poorly known) estimate. === AMOC deep current === 3.0 Sv Overturning THC by dense-water pressure pumps in the Greenland Sea 2,500 m deep basin exiting at 200-1,000 m deep next to Greenland (the Greenland Straits). 2.2 Sv Overturning THC by dense-water pressure pumps in the Greenland Sea 2,500 m deep basin exiting at 200-1,000 m deep between Faroes & Shetlands (the Faroes-Shetlands Channel). "Lab" Sv Overturning THC by dense-water pressure pumps in the Labrador Sea. 12-"Lab" Sv Overturning THC at 1,000-3,000 m deep by dense-water pressure pumps in the high North Atlantic just south of the Greenland-Scotland ridge. ------------------- 17.2 Sv Total AMOC flow rate. === The Gulf Stream surface current at the PIES line flowing East-Northeast in the high North Atlantic half way Newfoundland to Ireland === 17.2 Sv Total AMOC flow rate. 15.4 Sv Wind-driven clockwise North Atlantic gyre. ------------------- 32.6 Sv Total Gulf Stream flow rate at the PIES line just south of Greenland tip. The quantities are really known accurate to 0.1 Sv, more like +/-1 Sv and that's the problem with measuring the changes, especially whether the AMOC is slowing. The 17 Sv Total AMOC flow rate carries much more heat than the 15 Sv wind-driven clockwise North Atlantic gyre because the AMOC water returns at a bitter cold 3 degrees but the wind-driven clockwise North Atlantic gyre surface flow returns at a temperature only a few degrees colder than it went north so it isn't dumping as much heat in the northern regiona as the AMOC. That's the whole story.
Have you ever looked at Milankovitch (Orbital) Cycles theory? That could ALSO be happening and affecting the earth's climate as well. WE are just speeding it along currently. It also would explain the previous ice age as well.
I am extremely confused. The water moves at around 8 feet a second as said earlier in the video but then proceeds to say that a batch (or 35 feet) of it takes about a 1000 years to complete its cycle. Correct me if I’m wrong here but the math isn’t matching as the entire distance covered at 8 miles a second would not take a thousand years I’d imagine?
In a word: greed. People are not good at planning for far distant events. Generally they focus exclusively on what directly affects me and how do I get the best for me. Parents may plan for their children, but rarely factor in grand children or further.
Unfortunately, the most recent explosions in technology have occurred in cultures that are based on "dominion" over nature. That makes worrying about the effect of human activity not overly important culturally. It has taken an enormous effort to get people in such cultures to accept that they can cause problems that require respect for nature to fix. Because of that cultural bias, those who get serious financial benefits from heavy carbon-emitting industries find propaganda to depress political will pretty easy to generate.
That's the problem, physics state that as long as the Earth keeps turning the water will keep on flowing. That being said I have no idea what the final pattern will be after all the ice gets out of the way.
@@grindupBaker I suggest you go back to grade school physics. Because the water is not 'attached' to the earth like solid terrain is, when the earth rotates it passes under the water, making the appearance of flowing in the opposite direction. The loss of ice does not change this. The salinity may change but this does not change the principles of fluid dynamics. And yes, this should have been covered before high school.
It's so insignificant photos from the 1800s of shorelines still look very similar today. I remember when I was a teenager Al Gore was claiming New York was going to be underwater by a few feet I think 2015 or 20.
@@AtomicReverend Sea level rise is a nonlinear process you can’t tell by going to the beach on a sunny day…you can tell by……….a hurricane out in the gulf 100 miles away from the shore flooding everything along the Florida Coast …….figure it out
@BufordTGleason oh yes ignore your lying eyes for 45+ years believe that water doesn't self level... Right. More importantly let's ignore all the historical evidence that we have that is well documented. I am so tired of hearing the excuses that don't hold up under even the slightest bit of scrutiny, if you have pictures from the 1870s and the coastline looks almost absolutely identical today that shows there is little to no sea level rise you don't have a rise in ocean level. Now You have subsidence issues in some regions of the world such as New Orleans, Louisiana or Venice, Italy to name two of many places and you might even have sea level rise through the historic record when the ice caps melted off of North America approximately 10,000 to 12,000 years ago. What we have now is it a lot of contradictory evidence that goes against what the political leaders are saying and it goes against the scientific method approvable and repeatable results. Obviously we cannot melt all the ice on the planet numerous times how to prove with or without a doubt sea level rise but we do have a lot of evidence against it. We had a world war II plane that landed on the Greenland ice sheet that was dug out probably 15 years ago now that was under 170 ft of hard packed ice which started life is snowfall and that plane was on the surface . We hear the Greenland ice sheet is melting Non-Stop but it just doesn't hold up. You have to have new ice and snow uphill (further inland) to push the ice down into the ocean that's the way gravity works, that is the only way you can get an ice burg into the ocean because if that wasn't the case at some point you would run out of ice in a relatively short manner but we know from the Titanic it's been happening for well over a hundred years now and we know from the Viking folklore that it's probably been happening for well over 1200 years but again let's ignore the historical evidence. I remember when I was a child going to glacier National Park have they predicted we would be able to ice by the 1990s... Here's some news flash it didn't happen the ice is actually farther down the valley than when I was a child, not by much but it is still farther down the valley. I remember them saying the Arctic would be ice free in just a few years, that was a few decades ago but I do seem to recall athletes getting stuck in the ice as the Arctic Ocean froze around them. I also I've seen the Frozen trees in what is now artic tundra that about 1000 years ago was thawed out. Or how the mid evil warming period crops were grown in Europe that can no longer grow in that area because it was warmer back then. The list goes on and on. The actual real physical data doesn't show what politicians claim. There is no consensus just rampant computer models that are failed to get any prediction right in the last 50 years. I'm just old enough to remember the end of the 1970s when we were going to go through an ice age but that too did not happen.
@BufordTGleason also it should be fair to mention the historical data says there was more hurricanes in the 1800s and the turn of the last century than there is today that is factual you can look it up for yourself.
It is called the Beaufort Gyre. If AGW now referred to as c!mate change was real, the Gulf of Mexico would have no problem providing hot water to the system. CO2 is only .04% of the atmosphere and a far less potent GHG than water vapor. You are the carbon they want to reduce.
The Suspicious0bservers have been discussing this for at least 5 years, maybe more. The Sun has more influence on the AMOC than we're taught. This video is great for bringing in new people to this truth that the Earth is cooling rather than heating up.
Magnetic North is almost in Siberia.There was a youtuber called Maverick star...... He was showing how far the magnetic north pole was moving per day ..and now he cannot be found
Wrong. The glaciers are melting. Once they are gone, we're all screwed. It's Oct. 31st and it used to be freezing around this time. Now it's hot outside.
This is a scare story about things you cannot see. Actual observations using the RAPID-MOCHA array from 2004 to 2023 show, that although there can be a great deal of variability of flow in the ocean from month to month or even day to day, there has been no decline in the Gulf Stream, with flow oscillating around 32Sv (32 million cubic metres per second) throughout the period of observation. Continuous section measurements of the AMOC, available since 2004 at 26°N from the RAPID-MOCHA array, have shown that the AMOC strength decreased from 2004 to 2012, and thereafter, it has strengthened again. No relationship to CO2. "Florida Current transport observations reveal four decades of steady state" Volkov et al, 2024 (published in Nature). This paper shows that a key component of AMOC, the Florida Current, has remained remarkably steady for over 40 years. There is no climate crisis. The North Atlantic current has doubled its velocity over the course of a quarter of century (Oziel et al, 2020). This is based on actual satellite observations. The idea the AMOC is going to shut down is based on modelling. There is minimal real world evidence to support these outlandish claims. It relies upon climate models. You know, those Magical Truth Machines that keep making false predictions. It claims with 95% certainty that the AMOC with collapse by the end of the century. Come on! Really? Sea surface temperatures (SST) were trending downwards 2000-2018 (HadSST 4), and from 1950-1980, and from 1880-1910. The oceans warmed at a faster rate 1910-1940 than 1980-2010. Remember CO2 has been accumulating in the atmosphere at an accelerating rate all the time, so there is little correlation between the two. The ocean has warmed rapidly and repeatedly during the current interglacial with no correlation to CO2 e.g. 10,300-10,200 years before the present (y BP), 9,500y BP, 6,000-5,900y BP, 5,400-5,300y BP, 2,500-2,300y BP, 1,700-1,600y BP (Berner et al., 2008). There is a high frequency (18 events) of SST variability on the order of 1-3°C during a 10-50 year time resolution throughout the Holocene in the North Atlantic with no correlation to CO2. And Life just carried on.
Polar caps have moved and are continuing to move, hense we are further South now. The rotating axis of the earth has moved, the moon is still in the same orbit, the moon creates our tides and jet stream. This is easy to understand
The stoppage ir slowing down of the A.M.O.C is, most likely, a temporary event. An event that would last as long as there is ice melting from Greenland. Once all of the Northern Polar icecaps finish melting, the A.M.O.C would be back to normal. Europe and Canada would have warmer winters.
No change to deep global ThermoHaline Circulation (THC) because the region would be a paddling pool like the Arctic Ocean & Bering Strait. However, there'd be a shallow surface flow from the Pacific to Atlantic same as the tiny Bering Strait one beause the Pacific sea level is 1.0 m (3 feet) higher than the Atlantic sea level, obviously. All of the surface flows are either wind driven or else water running down hill exactly like a river runs down hill. They run down hill to Antartica & Greenland because the "heavy" water around Antartica & Greenland pushes down deep and away, leaving dents in the surface and lifting the ocean elsewhere in cul de sacs just like a wedge or crowbar going under it.. Around Antartica sea level is 2.0 m (7 feet) lower than the global average because of this. It's called global ThermoHaline Circulation (THC). It lifts the entire ocean except Polar by 6 feet every year, like a wedge or crowbar.
i loved the day after tomorrow i still go back to it sometimes its wild to me that this scenario is what they were depicting either i wasnt paying that close of attention or it flew way over my head when it came out. that scene where millions where jumping the boarder to mexico was still crazy. you know technically trumps wall would trap us all here if thats how it would actually go down because how old that movie is so many things have changed @.@
3 factors never considered (climate wise) 1) solar maximum/moon drift 2) volcanic activity (1 good eruption puts us into winter, over time) 3) plant decay (water and land)
This could be affect of the Milankovitch cycles which theory determines how glacial and inter-glacial happens, I wish people would take this cycle into their talk about the enviroment
Yeah, but do you know whats going to happen ?? The Artic ice will start melting more rapidly and the current will start loosing heat, and once the entire current turns cold there will be some catastrophic amount of deadly storms on the coast
Call me old and overcaffinated, but when you asked "How much Iron is found in the eddies?" my brain immediately jumped to the cartoon "Ed, Edd and Eddie" bc that sounds like the kind of crackhead premise they would have written an episode around XD
We would end ourselves before the earth freezes, and you're not talking about how long it will take to freeze the ocean. We're talking about 500,000 years.
Planet earth will be just fine regardless. We place far too much importance on the existence of humanity. Remember for 99.99% of the earth existence there was no humanity!
I was actually quitely convinced that the fresh water Melt would bring ocean currents to a Standstill, 6yrs ago ..that would be catastrophic for the, Nth Hemisphere I never took into account, wether there was. enough fresh water melt, or Icesheets, to halt the AMOC therefore the Gulf Stream .. Im kinda thinking now the Amoc will be slowed still not good, not really bad, but not stopped, .. Reason why, in the last 40 yrs, 50% of the Nth Pole Icesheets are gone .. that amount of melt has not been noticeable, concerning the AMOC .. i might have to a good sleep tonight..😊..
"in the last 40 yrs, 50% of the Nth Pole Icesheets are gone" == utter drivel "halt the AMOC therefore the Gulf Stream" == utter drivel It's estimated that the AMOC bifurcation point is at about 10 Sv but this doesn't seem to be a reliable estimate because I rarely come across it being mentioned. So if the AMOC deep flow drops from its 17 Sv to below 10 Sv then it will gradually over decades slow to a stop or almost stop all by itself is the (apparently poorly known) estimate. === AMOC deep current === 3.0 Sv Overturning THC by dense-water pressure pumps in the Greenland Sea 2,500 m deep basin exiting at 200-1,000 m deep next to Greenland (the Greenland Straits). 2.2 Sv Overturning THC by dense-water pressure pumps in the Greenland Sea 2,500 m deep basin exiting at 200-1,000 m deep between Faroes & Shetlands (the Faroes-Shetlands Channel). "Lab" Sv Overturning THC by dense-water pressure pumps in the Labrador Sea. 12-"Lab" Sv Overturning THC at 1,000-3,000 m deep by dense-water pressure pumps in the high North Atlantic just south of the Greenland-Scotland ridge. ------------------- 17.2 Sv Total AMOC flow rate. === The Gulf Stream surface current at the PIES line flowing East-Northeast in the high North Atlantic half way Newfoundland to Ireland === 17.2 Sv Total AMOC flow rate. 15.4 Sv Wind-driven clockwise North Atlantic gyre. ------------------- 32.6 Sv Total Gulf Stream flow rate at the PIES line just south of Greenland tip The quantities are really known accurate to 0.1 Sv, more like +/-1 Sv and that's the problem with measuring the changes, especially whether the AMOC is slowing. The 17 Sv Total AMOC flow rate carries much more heat than the 15 Sv wind-driven clockwise North Atlantic gyre because the AMOC water returns at a bitter cold 3 degrees but the wind-driven clockwise North Atlantic gyre surface flow returns at a temperature only a few degrees colder than it went north so it isn't dumping as much heat in the northern regiona as the AMOC. That's the whole story.
A bit like the mono tree planting idea. People mess with what they dont understand. More evil is done from good intention than from malicious evil intent.
But we have been way warmer than we are now before the last ice age, and since the earth's tempature rises after each cold spell (according to paleontologist) ice will melt, just like in one of your other videos where you sit there and showed that they found that there is ancient ruins under some of this ice in the North, particles of carbon are actually still low compared to what they were in the past
Actually this is an extremely good segment of yours, I like the concept that perhaps what is going on with the Gulf Stream is that it is moving or may go into two or three different streams. That'll be less catastrophic than the next ice age, but it also could mean other things. Remember, we had a mini ace age a few hundred years ago, and perhaps the currents were different then. A lot more to learn
Mini ice age when?
@@imlistening1137 believe is was back in 17th/18th century. uk suffered quite badly in the mini ice age
The mini ice ages were caused by volcanic eruptions, they can see this in probes taken and drilled from ice. In fact, these eruptions lasted for weeks and eventually led to the French Revolution since the peasants were starving for several years. Of course, there were other causes, too.
@@imlistening1137 The Little Ice Age, as it's been known, started in the late 1200's, and the effects of it lasted into WWII. Fording the Potomac, that iconic General Washington painting, was actually true, with large chunks of ice clogging the waterway. England had a Winter Ice Festival for centuries on the River Thames, the last one being in the 1880's (ice got too thin to support all the extra weight).
One of the darker aspects was the onset of the Bubonic Plague. As temperatures dropped, livestock were brought inside, and the infected ticks and fleas found human hosts.
@@yvesfrancoisritmo Thanks to both of you! Now, I will be up all night binging on the history of the mini-ice-age! History is so interesting!
Thank you for the detailed update. I do hope that a more positive projection is possible. Life will be hard enough without losing the AMOC.
I'm a bit surprised that these scientists didn't check the accuracy of their data when it showed them the currents were slowing. If something doesn't turn out as expected, check the source and try again. Although, I had no idea the Earth's magnetic field had any affect on undersea cables! Keep up the great work!!!!
If something doesn't fit currently accepted models, scientists flock to it. It'll get checked out.
I dunno. Are these real scientists? Or are they more like Paid Professionals who insist that arctic snow deposits a foot of snow a year every year then are surprised to find a WWII plane in 300 feet of snow, or got their research vessels trapped in arctic ice that they refused to believe existed (3 times now, '10, '14 & '19) because their research 'proved' otherwise.
This guy's still pushing "caused by climate change." Wtf does that empty phrase even mean, especially in this context? He's talking about climate changing "caused by climate change." That's utter rhetorical double-speak.
They have and they continue to do so. There's multiple monitoring stations -- the Mooring array, SAMBA array, AXMOC, the ICOS stations, and several others -- and they all confirm the AMOC has been slowing since the 1980s, not just the one (potentially) anomalous station referenced at the end of the video.
I love your videos. If we had TH-cam around and content like this when I was a kid, I'd be much more successful today.
It literally happens over night. Studies show that coral reefs of Newfoundland died in a single season. The thought is that fresh water over the ocean froze and sunlight could not get through killing the reefs.
The same in Florida. The coral was dieing little by little and last year lots of it died in one season. The ocean temp raised one more degree to break a record and that was it. Most of the coral could take no more. It simply stressed the coral to death. It was on the main stream media news (ABC) but just a quick, little clip about it. Most people just ignore it. It’s crazy, the base of the food chain is vanishing and most people simply ignore it.
You should do a video on how we can turn the plastic around the world into essential fuels like gasoline, diesel, jet fuels and natural gas and solid carbon all made from plastic with the process of electro pyrolysis. There is a great young TH-camr by the of @naturejab he’s dedicated years to studying the process and to building his current machine that has been proven to create all the before mentioned products. It would be awesome to see you make a video about the topic and even mention him because he’s truly changing the world.
Seriously, deep issues that can be turned around are rare! I'm definitely checking out any threads there might be available to view!
I agree with you but this can't be left to private business because they don't make money out of it and business do not take the environment into consideration. It needs government support to make it happen. In the US landfills are used over incinerators to generate electricity.
I appreciate your in-depth explanation of these complex subjects, especially things involving global ocean atmospheric and oceanic systems. I sometimes wonder if the slow-roll from the science community about what's going on is because they're kicking the can down the road until they get their data together, or don't want to panic people about what's already happening. Personally, I prefer to be prepared rather than scared and take a lot of what I see and hear with a grain of salt. Your show has become one of my go-to references in my personal understanding of what's up. Thanks for your work.
Don’t forget to Like the video and respect his wish to remain anonymous😅
Hi Steve! Great information, thank you for sharing! See you in the next one!!
Sewerage water processed or not is warm water and dumped in the rivers and oceans. And sewerage causes algae blooms. The algae blooms create heat too. So we are creating stagnant water to be collected by the currents after seasonal changes. But we are creating too much of it along the coasts where warm water gathers. Even in winter.
Another cup of coffee and info I need for my daily brain needs ❤😎
daily brain rot
Weather Modification and we dont have 100 years according to the word of God
This is why scientists don't use the term global warming much anymore, but rather, use the more accurate moniker of climate change.
Some places will get hotter, and some will get cooler. Some places will get dryer, and other places will see an overall increase in precipitation.
Everything from wind speed, as well as wind direction, to annual weather patterns will be thrown into an upheaval worldwide.
Food production worldwide will definitely be affected.
Migratory species will face difficulties, if not the danger of outright extinction.
Virtually no place on earth will be unaffected.
My kids are already being affected by such weather changes now, but my grandkids will really have their hands full. 😢
This is why we must do as much as we can, while we still can.
The climate always changes. The term is a political one intended to avoid the accuracy and accountability of hard science in favor of sciency sounding terminology, which is solely intended to dupe the public into greenlighting various scams and dubious power-grabbing schemes. CO2 as a greenhouse gas will warm the planet, in sufficient amounts. Global warming is the more correct term, if we're referencing CO2 effects on climate. But many of the effects of warming don't fit into a "crisis" concept, so the crisis cultists prefer not to address the topic head-on. It's all about avoiding open, honest, and objective conversations, where nuance and complex understandings kills the black and white narratives of crisis pushers.
Except we won't. Something this big that affects everyone worldwide, requires the world to cooperate with each other and I don't see that happening.
@@samsmom1491 the world DID cooperate on eliminating CFC's. That is likely the reason we reversed the hole in the ozone layer.. That was a global problem with a global solution, a successfully accomplished global policy. If there is verified proof of a global issue with a verifiable policy change that will likely eliminate the problem, people can and will make that change. But the key word is "verified".
This is normal Canadian weather. I'll be fine...
Me too hoser. The Winter of My Discount Tent.
Fellow Canadian in California. Cape Bretoner born & raised. Yup, it’d be “normal” weather wise, but the grocery store shelves would be pretty empty bc where the food used to be grown would be in jeopardy. Sorry to spill the beans or lack there of! 😮
The whole world's not even aware of what's being discussed here. Get with it!
when the theory is taken out of conspiracy theory, the conclusion is pretty obvious..
The Gulf Stream, part of the AMOC, is a powerful ocean current that carries warm water from the Gulf of Mexico across the Atlantic to Europe. It plays a vital role in moderating temperatures, keeping Northern Europe warmer than it would otherwise be at those latitudes.
"Here's Why Stopping the Gulf Stream Shocked the World"
There's an 80/20 rule, which means a small amount can yield a majority. Bet we'll find (soon) a small change in AMOC will result in a big change in climate/biology. CO2 takes decades before it begins it real 'greenhouse effect', meaning we are only just now seeing the impact of the 80/90s emissions, a hothouse burning planet guaranteed for centuries.
CO2 is still at very low levels compared to what it should be. It had reached dangerously low levels for plant life by 1850. Some researchers say this is what recently created the Sahara Desert.
Would you kindly consider including metric system measurements alongside your existing units in future videos? This would be really helpful for your international viewers. Thank you!
I think it's time that you people from the old world catch up to Modern math and learn how to use the imperial system. Your outdated metric system so "old school" We can't even understand why you insist on going with that archaic method of measurement. How long ago did Roman numerals become irrelevant? But we still hold on to metric system for, I don't know sentimental reasons? 😂 welcome to the new millennia 😂😂
@@markeldred5541 wow, if anything, it's the opposite. Metric is the better and more modern system.
@@Schnook yeah I'm sure you and your peers have convinced you of that. Just because you have 10 fingers a base 10 makes the most sense, what a ridiculous thought
@@Schnook I think you should get your sense of humour recalibrated. Either imperial or metric will do, it might help you noyice when someone is being humerous.
@@skasteve6528 👍
Love and Respect 🙏 Thank's and Bless you ❤️ Congratulations 👌
Learn somethings people. Suspicious observers channel will tell you how this all goes together and fully explains the CYCLE OUR EARTH AND ITS BUDDY THE SUN are doing together as they have for millions of years we justnhappen to be the lucky ones for this one..ELE nothing humans do can stop it.
"Sometimes they take a bite out of humans...for research purposes" lol, i had to rewind a few times on that one, i got it eventually but it still sounds pretty funny
Thank you. Check out the thawing permafrost of Siberia and its prehistoric methane being released.
This planet goes through changes all the time. We are just along for the ride. Not anything we can do about it. Humanity will just have to adjust.
For this to happen, Greenland will have to have a lot of ice melt. It's lost some ice and the ice loss will likely speed up. But, once the ice melts near the coast, the rate will slow down. Melting the interior will be much more difficult. It's further from the warm ocean, it's at a much higher elevation since the ice is thousands of feet thick and central Greenland land base is at a low elevation surrounded by mountains, which will hold the ice in the interior. Unless a meteor strikes Greenland and melts hundreds of cubic miles of ice, stopping the AMOC won't happen any time soon.
,but it will happen. Next month or 3 decades, it will happen.
The Greenland ice sheet is growing in the middle.
@@davidmckendry7684, yeah, let’s all wait until all the ice in polar regions melts before we change anything.
BTW, the Arctic Ocean is now free of ice right up to the North Pole by the end of summer so, yeah let’s wait for Greenland to melt completely… 🤷🏻♂️
@@davidmckendry7684 More like thousands of years, if ever.
@@luisaraujo4708
It is a cycle.
Dont forget the weather getting haywire due to temperature differences and changing climate zones. These alone may make farming almost impossible around the globe. No more long enough seasons to grow food is pretty scary possibility.
We can already see some minor effects, like whole USA under drought conditions... Or bathtub temps at Florida coast, where warm water should travel northwards, killing corals.
Wait until Campi Flegrei blows. And there are a few dozen others, and the weakening magnetic field, and the unstable sun, and a higher frequency of space impacts and airburts than we`ve been told. But the woke investors haven`t figured out how to capitalize off actual reality yet.
That sounds like a lot of information buddy. I'll listen to it again.
Very informative! Ty. I really learned some things and will further research. Keep it up!
You should do a video about the Chinook winds in Southern Alberta Canada!
This was good. I am looking forward to watching more from your channel.
So in other words, Gozer is the key master.
This was known in the 80s when the Russians blocked off a large portion of the fresh water flowing into the arctic.
Yeah, the manowar sting sucks, even if only a little piece touches you. It's a sick new kind of pain. Feels like strong bee toxin ( I had that expirience too), and lasts all day long or more
It HAS happened before and it can happen again. The gulf stream is basically a heatsink or radiator and it can stop.
Meaningless
Climate change has always been a natural cycle of the planet. Since the undustrial age we have sped up global warming and co2 emissions on a global scale in the air and oceans and land. Ushering in the next ice age prematurely is going to be interesting to say the least.
Undustrial? This made me do a double take lol
The rate of climate change happens in 1000 of years time frames and the one we are experiencing now from human actions is happening in about a 100 years.
Yes it does. However some of them are quite lethal. We can’t out run them. There is no hiding place. Worse still you can’t stop the Sun moving these magnetic poles around so that the usual order and routes of jet streams take on a different course. And it can do that fairly quickly.
Its global warming.. no, global cooling...😂
It’s a hoax no wait it’s natural no wait Democrats control the weather……..sure I see your point.
Great video thank you.
It's estimated that the AMOC bifurcation point is at about 10 Sv but this doesn't seem to be a reliable estimate because I rarely come across it being mentioned. So if the AMOC deep flow drops from its 17 Sv to below 10 Sv then it will gradually over decades slow to a stop or almost stop all by itself is the (apparently poorly known) estimate.
=== AMOC deep current ===
3.0 Sv Overturning THC by dense-water pressure pumps in the Greenland Sea 2,500 m deep basin exiting at 200-1,000 m deep next to Greenland (the Greenland Straits).
2.2 Sv Overturning THC by dense-water pressure pumps in the Greenland Sea 2,500 m deep basin exiting at 200-1,000 m deep between Faroes & Shetlands (the Faroes-Shetlands Channel).
"Lab" Sv Overturning THC by dense-water pressure pumps in the Labrador Sea.
12-"Lab" Sv Overturning THC at 1,000-3,000 m deep by dense-water pressure pumps in the high North Atlantic just south of the Greenland-Scotland ridge.
-------------------
17.2 Sv Total AMOC flow rate.
=== The Gulf Stream surface current at the PIES line flowing East-Northeast in the high North Atlantic half way Newfoundland to Ireland ===
17.2 Sv Total AMOC flow rate.
15.4 Sv Wind-driven clockwise North Atlantic gyre.
-------------------
32.6 Sv Total Gulf Stream flow rate at the PIES line just south of Greenland tip.
The quantities are really known accurate to 0.1 Sv, more like +/-1 Sv and that's the problem with measuring the changes, especially whether the AMOC is slowing.
The 17 Sv Total AMOC flow rate carries much more heat than the 15 Sv wind-driven clockwise North Atlantic gyre because the AMOC water returns at a bitter cold 3 degrees but the wind-driven clockwise North Atlantic gyre surface flow returns at a temperature only a few degrees colder than it went north so it isn't dumping as much heat in the northern regiona as the AMOC. That's the whole story.
We were lucky enough to live in one of the most stable climate periods in Earth's history. Leave it to humans to screw it all up.
And here we are thinking we can terraform Mars or any other planet while we can't even do that here on Earth (yet).
Have you ever looked at Milankovitch (Orbital) Cycles theory? That could ALSO be happening and affecting the earth's climate as well. WE are just speeding it along currently. It also would explain the previous ice age as well.
Please always state Celsius degrees as well, many of us have no clue what a certain amount of Fahrenheit means
Subtract 30 from the temperature and divide by 2. It's not perfect, but it will give you a decent idea. Like 50F - 30 = 20 ÷ 2 = 10C
It is a shame the ego centered Americans refused to follow the rest of the world and go metric. Good old Americans.
@@mikewithers6877 The US is only sticking with it so that Liberia won't feel all alone in the world. :P
That’s what Google is for.
@@mikewithers6877 it's not the people. It's our government. They should have changed it long ago.
If they want to be taken seriously, they need to stop saying, " it COULD happen. In 70 days. Or years."
In comparison... religion tells us to be good people because a crucified son might eventually come back in 100 or 5000 years.
Well if the world stops spinning the gulf stream may stop, but
I am extremely confused. The water moves at around 8 feet a second as said earlier in the video but then proceeds to say that a batch (or 35 feet) of it takes about a 1000 years to complete its cycle. Correct me if I’m wrong here but the math isn’t matching as the entire distance covered at 8 miles a second would not take a thousand years I’d imagine?
If humans are so intelligent, why are we doing everything we can to cause the extinction of our own species?!?
In a word: greed. People are not good at planning for far distant events. Generally they focus exclusively on what directly affects me and how do I get the best for me. Parents may plan for their children, but rarely factor in grand children or further.
Unfortunately, the most recent explosions in technology have occurred in cultures that are based on "dominion" over nature. That makes worrying about the effect of human activity not overly important culturally. It has taken an enormous effort to get people in such cultures to accept that they can cause problems that require respect for nature to fix. Because of that cultural bias, those who get serious financial benefits from heavy carbon-emitting industries find propaganda to depress political will pretty easy to generate.
greed!!!!!
is there a secret message to the things you have on your desk?🤔
We are so arrogant to think we are that important,she will bend but won’t break and we will just be a genetic footprint
That's the problem, physics state that as long as the Earth keeps turning the water will keep on flowing. That being said I have no idea what the final pattern will be after all the ice gets out of the way.
Drivel
@@grindupBaker I suggest you go back to grade school physics. Because the water is not 'attached' to the earth like solid terrain is, when the earth rotates it passes under the water, making the appearance of flowing in the opposite direction. The loss of ice does not change this. The salinity may change but this does not change the principles of fluid dynamics. And yes, this should have been covered before high school.
Without progression at this rate how long to warm all water. Upwelling will stop at a certain temperature right
Sea level is rising, it is not rising fast.
It's so insignificant photos from the 1800s of shorelines still look very similar today.
I remember when I was a teenager Al Gore was claiming New York was going to be underwater by a few feet I think 2015 or 20.
Or is the land sinking.
@@AtomicReverend Sea level rise is a nonlinear process you can’t tell by going to the beach on a sunny day…you can tell by……….a hurricane out in the gulf 100 miles away from the shore flooding everything along the Florida Coast …….figure it out
@BufordTGleason oh yes ignore your lying eyes for 45+ years believe that water doesn't self level... Right. More importantly let's ignore all the historical evidence that we have that is well documented.
I am so tired of hearing the excuses that don't hold up under even the slightest bit of scrutiny, if you have pictures from the 1870s and the coastline looks almost absolutely identical today that shows there is little to no sea level rise you don't have a rise in ocean level. Now You have subsidence issues in some regions of the world such as New Orleans, Louisiana or Venice, Italy to name two of many places and you might even have sea level rise through the historic record when the ice caps melted off of North America approximately 10,000 to 12,000 years ago.
What we have now is it a lot of contradictory evidence that goes against what the political leaders are saying and it goes against the scientific method approvable and repeatable results. Obviously we cannot melt all the ice on the planet numerous times how to prove with or without a doubt sea level rise but we do have a lot of evidence against it. We had a world war II plane that landed on the Greenland ice sheet that was dug out probably 15 years ago now that was under 170 ft of hard packed ice which started life is snowfall and that plane was on the surface . We hear the Greenland ice sheet is melting Non-Stop but it just doesn't hold up. You have to have new ice and snow uphill (further inland) to push the ice down into the ocean that's the way gravity works, that is the only way you can get an ice burg into the ocean because if that wasn't the case at some point you would run out of ice in a relatively short manner but we know from the Titanic it's been happening for well over a hundred years now and we know from the Viking folklore that it's probably been happening for well over 1200 years but again let's ignore the historical evidence. I remember when I was a child going to glacier National Park have they predicted we would be able to ice by the 1990s... Here's some news flash it didn't happen the ice is actually farther down the valley than when I was a child, not by much but it is still farther down the valley. I remember them saying the Arctic would be ice free in just a few years, that was a few decades ago but I do seem to recall athletes getting stuck in the ice as the Arctic Ocean froze around them. I also I've seen the Frozen trees in what is now artic tundra that about 1000 years ago was thawed out. Or how the mid evil warming period crops were grown in Europe that can no longer grow in that area because it was warmer back then. The list goes on and on.
The actual real physical data doesn't show what politicians claim. There is no consensus just rampant computer models that are failed to get any prediction right in the last 50 years. I'm just old enough to remember the end of the 1970s when we were going to go through an ice age but that too did not happen.
@BufordTGleason also it should be fair to mention the historical data says there was more hurricanes in the 1800s and the turn of the last century than there is today that is factual you can look it up for yourself.
No idea wtf Fahrenheit is 🤔
It's a measure of temperature. Like Celsius. Look it up.
Its a few seconds to copy and paste into google, that's what I do when I have no idea wtf something is.
My thoughts exactly. Of all the possibilities of demonstrating exponential growth!🤦♀️
I think this is a great program and I already forgot your name.
But how do I get you to say Fahrenheit and CELCIUS?
Please
When did Seth Rogen start an environmental channel? 😆
It's hard to believe that the current will stop altogether or that another current won't be created as geothermal heat also warms the ocean water.
10 000 lat temu na Saharze był las! A życie istniało i miało się dobrze! 😊
I'm not about to face these forecast without some coffee got you the like today buddy😂😂😂
Whoa I see AWIPS! Pretty cool seeing things I use on videos.
It is called the Beaufort Gyre. If AGW now referred to as c!mate change was real, the Gulf of Mexico would have no problem providing hot water to the system. CO2 is only .04% of the atmosphere and a far less potent GHG than water vapor. You are the carbon they want to reduce.
reverend fry Unit 6088 == Clueless half-witted Parrot. Polly wanna cracker?
The Suspicious0bservers have been discussing this for at least 5 years, maybe more. The Sun has more influence on the AMOC than we're taught. This video is great for bringing in new people to this truth that the Earth is cooling rather than heating up.
Nope just wrong still getting warmer over all = the breakdown of climate systems causing Climate chaos - That's what video is about
Magnetic North is almost in Siberia.There was a youtuber called Maverick star......
He was showing how far the magnetic north pole was moving per day ..and now he cannot be found
Wrong. The glaciers are melting. Once they are gone, we're all screwed. It's Oct. 31st and it used to be freezing around this time. Now it's hot outside.
@@runnergo1398 2 inches of snow and still coming down.., stfu...
@@YeisenAchitelyes your local weather is a barometer for the global average temperature. The cognitive dissonance in this comment section...
"it could be next year, or it could be in 80 years" that the gulf stream just "stops"...
What is that an 8,000% difference? Yeah, seems reliable!
This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
Actual observations using the RAPID-MOCHA array from 2004 to 2023 show, that although there can be a great deal of variability of flow in the ocean from month to month or even day to day, there has been no decline in the Gulf Stream, with flow oscillating around 32Sv (32 million cubic metres per second) throughout the period of observation.
Continuous section measurements of the AMOC, available since 2004 at 26°N from the RAPID-MOCHA array, have shown that the AMOC strength decreased from 2004 to 2012, and thereafter, it has strengthened again. No relationship to CO2.
"Florida Current transport observations reveal four decades of steady state" Volkov et al, 2024 (published in Nature). This paper shows that a key component of AMOC, the Florida Current, has remained remarkably steady for over 40 years.
There is no climate crisis.
The North Atlantic current has doubled its velocity over the course of a quarter of century (Oziel et al, 2020). This is based on actual satellite observations.
The idea the AMOC is going to shut down is based on modelling. There is minimal real world evidence to support these outlandish claims. It relies upon climate models. You know, those Magical Truth Machines that keep making false predictions. It claims with 95% certainty that the AMOC with collapse by the end of the century. Come on! Really?
Sea surface temperatures (SST) were trending downwards 2000-2018 (HadSST 4), and from 1950-1980, and from 1880-1910. The oceans warmed at a faster rate 1910-1940 than 1980-2010. Remember CO2 has been accumulating in the atmosphere at an accelerating rate all the time, so there is little correlation between the two.
The ocean has warmed rapidly and repeatedly during the current interglacial with no correlation to CO2 e.g. 10,300-10,200 years before the present (y BP), 9,500y BP, 6,000-5,900y BP, 5,400-5,300y BP, 2,500-2,300y BP, 1,700-1,600y BP (Berner et al., 2008). There is a high frequency (18 events) of SST variability on the order of 1-3°C during a 10-50 year time resolution throughout the Holocene in the North Atlantic with no correlation to CO2. And Life just carried on.
Big - point to no celcius degrees
Polar caps have moved and are continuing to move, hense we are further South now. The rotating axis of the earth has moved, the moon is still in the same orbit, the moon creates our tides and jet stream.
This is easy to understand
"It Started Killing All the Bees in Australia, a Year Later the Result Was Shocking"
The stoppage ir slowing down of the A.M.O.C is, most likely, a temporary event.
An event that would last as long as there is ice melting from Greenland.
Once all of the Northern Polar icecaps finish melting, the A.M.O.C would be back to normal.
Europe and Canada would have warmer winters.
I love science
There is no science here.
@@JD-un2zv Oh yeah, real science is done by Republicans huh? Lmao
What about changes in oceanic topography and continental drift? Current will always flow towards the path of least resistance.
Thank u for info
So what would happen if Panama sunk, or there's an opening connecting the Pacific Ocean with the Caribbean Sea?
No change to deep global ThermoHaline Circulation (THC) because the region would be a paddling pool like the Arctic Ocean & Bering Strait. However, there'd be a shallow surface flow from the Pacific to Atlantic same as the tiny Bering Strait one beause the Pacific sea level is 1.0 m (3 feet) higher than the Atlantic sea level, obviously. All of the surface flows are either wind driven or else water running down hill exactly like a river runs down hill. They run down hill to Antartica & Greenland because the "heavy" water around Antartica & Greenland pushes down deep and away, leaving dents in the surface and lifting the ocean elsewhere in cul de sacs just like a wedge or crowbar going under it.. Around Antartica sea level is 2.0 m (7 feet) lower than the global average because of this. It's called global ThermoHaline Circulation (THC). It lifts the entire ocean except Polar by 6 feet every year, like a wedge or crowbar.
Wow all this coming from the same scientist who told us Florida would be underwater by now.
20:47 “one of these days Alice, one of these days….”
These thumbnails are slightly getting out of control.
The currents don't flow correctly around South Africa's tip. Augulas current comes from the South Pole.
I live on gulf Coast. Warm here. Its gotta go somewhere.
i loved the day after tomorrow i still go back to it sometimes its wild to me that this scenario is what they were depicting either i wasnt paying that close of attention or it flew way over my head when it came out. that scene where millions where jumping the boarder to mexico was still crazy. you know technically trumps wall would trap us all here if thats how it would actually go down because how old that movie is so many things have changed @.@
Warm water is "Lazy" water.
The Cold is the worst 🌊🥶
do a segment on weather machines!
The Gulf stream warms places east of the English channel
2025 is just around the corner. Let's see if their predictions come true, or if they're just filled with hot air.
3 factors never considered (climate wise)
1) solar maximum/moon drift
2) volcanic activity (1 good eruption puts us into winter, over time)
3) plant decay (water and land)
Good stuff 👍. Cool new editing and FX lately.
So this is a trend… thousands of years involved… if only we could have changed the dinosaur farts.. !
This could be affect of the Milankovitch cycles which theory determines how glacial and inter-glacial happens, I wish people would take this cycle into their talk about the enviroment
All sings of the up coming little ice age that hit the planet roughly 10,000 years ago.
Yeah, but do you know whats going to happen ?? The Artic ice will start melting more rapidly and the current will start loosing heat, and once the entire current turns cold there will be some catastrophic amount of deadly storms on the coast
i felt like the first half of the video was propaganda and the last part of the video tells me why
Call me old and overcaffinated, but when you asked "How much Iron is found in the eddies?" my brain immediately jumped to the cartoon "Ed, Edd and Eddie" bc that sounds like the kind of crackhead premise they would have written an episode around XD
We would end ourselves before the earth freezes, and you're not talking about how long it will take to freeze the ocean. We're talking about 500,000 years.
The thought is scary.
Planet earth will be just fine regardless.
We place far too much importance on the existence of humanity.
Remember for 99.99% of the earth existence there was no humanity!
I'm with you mate (or I suppose that means I'm against you mate, boy this Catch 22 is a fine Catch)
@ yeah nice catch. But sure humanity is not totally without value.
I was actually quitely convinced that the fresh water Melt would bring ocean currents to a Standstill, 6yrs ago ..that would be catastrophic for the,
Nth Hemisphere
I never took into account, wether there was. enough fresh water melt, or Icesheets, to halt the AMOC therefore the Gulf Stream ..
Im kinda thinking now the Amoc will be slowed still not good, not really bad,
but not stopped, ..
Reason why, in the last 40 yrs, 50% of the Nth Pole Icesheets are gone .. that amount of melt has not been noticeable, concerning the AMOC ..
i might have to a good sleep tonight..😊..
"in the last 40 yrs, 50% of the Nth Pole Icesheets are gone" == utter drivel
"halt the AMOC therefore the Gulf Stream" == utter drivel
It's estimated that the AMOC bifurcation point is at about 10 Sv but this doesn't seem to be a reliable estimate because I rarely come across it being mentioned. So if the AMOC deep flow drops from its 17 Sv to below 10 Sv then it will gradually over decades slow to a stop or almost stop all by itself is the (apparently poorly known) estimate.
=== AMOC deep current ===
3.0 Sv Overturning THC by dense-water pressure pumps in the Greenland Sea 2,500 m deep basin exiting at 200-1,000 m deep next to Greenland (the Greenland Straits).
2.2 Sv Overturning THC by dense-water pressure pumps in the Greenland Sea 2,500 m deep basin exiting at 200-1,000 m deep between Faroes & Shetlands (the Faroes-Shetlands Channel).
"Lab" Sv Overturning THC by dense-water pressure pumps in the Labrador Sea.
12-"Lab" Sv Overturning THC at 1,000-3,000 m deep by dense-water pressure pumps in the high North Atlantic just south of the Greenland-Scotland ridge.
-------------------
17.2 Sv Total AMOC flow rate.
=== The Gulf Stream surface current at the PIES line flowing East-Northeast in the high North Atlantic half way Newfoundland to Ireland ===
17.2 Sv Total AMOC flow rate.
15.4 Sv Wind-driven clockwise North Atlantic gyre.
-------------------
32.6 Sv Total Gulf Stream flow rate at the PIES line just south of Greenland tip
The quantities are really known accurate to 0.1 Sv, more like +/-1 Sv and that's the problem with measuring the changes, especially whether the AMOC is slowing.
The 17 Sv Total AMOC flow rate carries much more heat than the 15 Sv wind-driven clockwise North Atlantic gyre because the AMOC water returns at a bitter cold 3 degrees but the wind-driven clockwise North Atlantic gyre surface flow returns at a temperature only a few degrees colder than it went north so it isn't dumping as much heat in the northern regiona as the AMOC. That's the whole story.
1:44 SO THATS HOW HURRICANES STEAR TOWARDS THE U.S!!! 😲😲😲
It's almost like science is proving how the book of revelation will actually be true when it happens.
Uhhh no
Extrapolation back a million years is ridiculous
And how do you know HARPP is not to blame.
Because employees of HRPP have been whistleblowing on the company..
A bit like the mono tree planting idea. People mess with what they dont understand. More evil is done from good intention than from malicious evil intent.
Metric measurements are better for scientific discussions
But we have been way warmer than we are now before the last ice age, and since the earth's tempature rises after each cold spell (according to paleontologist) ice will melt, just like in one of your other videos where you sit there and showed that they found that there is ancient ruins under some of this ice in the North, particles of carbon are actually still low compared to what they were in the past
Remember warm water freezes faster than cold water 😎
@@Mollecules75 Warm water does not freeze faster than cold water, in fact its the opposite and it takes longer to freeze under the same conditions.
We don't need no stinkin Gulf Stream!