My father served two tours in Vietnam. He was part of a Heavy Field AMy father served two tours in Vietnam. He was in the Heavy Field Artillery Battalion for the 1st Calvary - The horse that couldn't be riddin, and the line that couldn't be crossed. He passed away a few years ago, but I will never forget him and love him forever 💫✨ Thank you to all the men and women in our armed forces. POW MIA - YOU ARE NEVER FORGOTTEN
I served with the Artillery in the beginning of my career in the Marine Corps. 12th Marine Corps Regiment, specifically 4th Bn/ 12th Marines and 3rd Bn, 12th Marines in 1974-1975. Then to 29 Palms, MCB, California with the 1st Field Artillery Group, FMF, ie 1st FAG. As a Ground Radio Repairmen. As they say in the Corps the King of the Battle is Artillery and the Queen of battle is the Grunts. Gotta love these guys. Better to ride than walk I’d say. Semper Fidelis Marines.
I was 13B10, In 85, I went to 1st AD, 1Bn 22Fa in Nuremberg. M109A2. Loved it. We had the copperhead then, and I just heard the A7 STILL has 1 or 2 copperheads on hand as well! I have to say tho.. The power packs for the A2 SUCKED! I always said there should just be a generator to run the gun systems while emplaced... now we do. your welcome. Also, go get me some hydraulic cherry juice for the gun, from the Cook. He knows what to use...
I was next to a battery of 8 inch Howitzers and 175 mm "Long Toms" in VN in '68. When they shot over our area you needed to be sure there was nothing on shelves near your head.
@@martinkerker1190 We called the 155mm towed gun 'pig iron' because of its weight and difficulty to handle. If memory serves, the spades weighed close to a hundred pounds each.
They showed the Honest John Rocket at 1.23 min, I was in a Honest John rocket Unit. We had two rockets if we fired both of them we became an infantry company that's what they used to say. they also showed the corporal missal before it they were in the same Casern I was in. In the states I was in a 155 outfit in the 1st infantry Div.
More or less the same story in modern MLRS units. I was trained as an MLRS crewman. Spent most of my time deployed mucking around as an infantryman in both howitzer and MLRS units.
My grandfather won medals for raining down this kind of ordinance onto Nazis in world war two. I honor his memory by hating the nazis and fascists he fought against every bit as much as he did.
Chiến tranh VN từ 1965-1975 cũng có xử dụng 105mm -155mm và 175mm song cùng thể loại những model mới tiện lợi hơn đáp ứng yểm trợ nhanh hơn không thấy xuất hiện
The German did not invent rocket technology... Ballard, a US engineer, was the one who perfected the uses of gyros and ballistics...the German, in their war effort, invested heavily in this technology and perfected it... while again, the US, Canada and Britain perfected the atomic weapon...
Awesome upload, thank you. Question For the experts out there: if the the maximum elevation of the 175 mm m107 gun is 1166 mills, what would be the elevation of a single mill, if we measure it in millimeters? Just asking here fellas.
Actual field artilleryman here: The Mil does not equal "1 millimeter" it's closest metric equivalent is the micrometer. But to answer the question: 1 Mil = 0.0254 mm
A true miliradian is one thousandth of a radian, which is (1/2π turns) or 57.296°. Therefore a milirad is about 0.057° or 3.438' However, NATO member state armed forces define a mil as (1/6400 turns), 0.056°, or 3.375' 1166 NATO mil is 65.5875° Hopefully this covers everything relevant
I was in C Battery of the 13th in 2008-2009 it's an MLRS unit now...or was...I think they may have switched to HIMARS, which is just a wheeled version of MLRS.
@Liam Murphy I enlisted in the Arty and was always 155’s. I was only 5’5” 140lbs. I was on M109’s in Germany and then towed 198’s at Ord. Yeah, it started to kick my butt humping 90lb projos. Going thru PNOC they always gave me the M60 or radio to carry even tho we had 6’ tall grunts in our squad. Go figure, huh?
@pyrotechnic5254 I believe so. By new generation I mean the one with GPS positioning and onboard fire solutions computer. Also has a travel lock mechanism for the tube that can be operated from within. The crew never has to go outside and has the ability to do quick fire missions at any time. There might be other improvements but I can't remember. I did see these being demonstrated live fire at Fort Sill. The original (well, compared to the newer version, that is a longer barrel so I guess the A1?) was the one I trained on. All gun data was generated and sent by the FDC. Later on I was the FDO for an 8" howitzer battery.
@@13thBear Perhaps overall, however, it did help to crack the stout defenses of Sebastopol during Barbarossa. Those piercing Rockling (Sp)? shells, you know?
The title card at the beginning of this reel says this film is from 1965 (MCMLXV) not 1966 (MCMLXVI). I am averse to being a pedant about such things but we’re talking about history here, where dates are important.
This was a period of transition in the Army. A lot of the towed systems were holdovers from WWII and Korea. Self propelled systems were beginning to emerge based on developing doctrine to counter the Soviet Union. By the time I entered the Army in 1986, we were down to 7 main artillery systems (105T, 155T, 155SP, 8"SP, MLRS, Lance, Pershing) which soon went to 5 with the retirement of Lance and Pershing (the weapon that won the Cold War). It was a doctrine known as Air-Land implemented during the '80s that reorganized the composition of artillery formations and tactics.
Love these old tech cold war films. Intense manual labor, time consuming human input on dials, wheels, jacks, weather vanes, trucks, hoists, bolts, ratchets, hammers...all for just one lousy shot! Gotta like the narrators too - machine gun delivery and puurfeckt dickshun!
I understand that artillery is the king of the battlefield, but I just don't get a sense of how the whole thing merges together...arti, tanks, grunts.. anyone have a link to a good explanation video?
The MLRS is. I dont remember if those are capable of firing cruise missiles or not but seems like I read something that said it was. I coould be wrong though.
Yes, they can, and have...in Desert Storm and at least once that I know of in 2003 during OIF. The unit I first went to was a Paladin unit. They had some encounters during the initial invasion of Iraq where direct fire was needed. Source: Was a field artilleryman from 2005 to 2013.
@@jackbelk8527 you don't need the spade to fire directly. You do need it when you plan on sustained fire. The Paladin is quite capable of taking out tanks if need absolutely needs to.
S-56 was the company designation of the helo. The military designation was CH-37 Mojave for those wondering. It was basically obsolete when it entered service. Only used until turbo-shaft heavy-lift helicopters could be developed to replace it like the Skycrane. Interesting tidbit of info: There WAS a variant of the CH-56 used as an Airborne Early Warning platform. Basically replaced the cargo bay with a radar system.
Speaking as an MLRS crewman...eh...it basically just turned us into infantry units. There's been very little need for MLRS batteries in recent conflicts. In fact, in the 3 years I spent in Iraq, not once did we ever bring, or use, out field pieces, and I served in both Paladin and MLRS units.
@pyrotechnic5254 If you're talking about the TMDP that didn't demil the launchers...just the older missiles, with most of them being reconstituted into new systems. The MLRS and HIMARS are both still in active service...so I have no idea what you're talking about. In fact MLRS is getting an upgrade. Wherever you're getting your info from, it's bad info.
@pyrotechnic5254 you can probably still find the slide show from it online. Was a big thing that went out around 2015ish. They had to reconstitute the old missiles because the fuel can only be contained in them safely for so long before it's dangerous to handle them, nevermind fire them. Plus with the new upgrades, they came with new missile systems, so there was little need to keep the older ones around save for training maybe, if they weren't too old.
Nope. It was part of the nuclear deterrent and mostly deployed in Europe and Korea. They did consider producing HE, Biological, Chemical, and a few other variants but, they were never produced in any real quantity. The development of cruise missiles and more cost-effective field artillery platforms more or less made it obsolete.
I was in a 175MM self propelled gun unit and arrived in Vietnam in October of 1965. B Btry 2nd Battalion 32 Artillery. I went from Fort Sill, Ok with the unit on the USS Gordon.
Because the rest of the world, particularly NATO with whom we needed a common standard, does. And the metric system is a much easier method to deal with tactically.
![[ไฮไลต์] ฟุตบอลชาย ฝรั่งเศส vs อเมริกา รอบแบ่งกลุ่ม | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/oZ9aSS0NEEg/mqdefault.jpg)
![[ไฮไลต์] ฟุตบอลชาย อุซเบกิสถาน vs สเปน รอบแบ่งกลุ่ม | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2ps5WKV1Mq0/mqdefault.jpg)
![คุณอาเรียโต๊ะข้างๆ พูดรัสเซียหวานใส่ซะหัวใจจะวาย ตอนที่ 4 [ซับไทย] 【Ani-One Thailand】](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_vK_cden2f8/mqdefault.jpg)
![THE TOYS x NONT TANONT - ดอกไม้ที่รอฝน (spring) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pPa1d5cC8M4/mqdefault.jpg)
I was a Gunner on the M110 8incj SP howitzer in Vietnam with A battery 2/94 artillery from July 1969 til September 1970
Thank you for your service 🙏
My father served two tours in Vietnam. He was part of a Heavy Field AMy father served two tours in Vietnam. He was in the Heavy Field Artillery Battalion for the 1st Calvary - The horse that couldn't be riddin, and the line that couldn't be crossed. He passed away a few years ago, but I will never forget him and love him forever 💫✨ Thank you to all the men and women in our armed forces. POW MIA - YOU ARE NEVER FORGOTTEN
I can't understand why that glaring white star was used. Would that not make a good target?
@@jamielacourse7578 😅😊no8th8
Thanks
I served with the Artillery in the beginning of my career in the Marine Corps. 12th Marine Corps Regiment, specifically 4th Bn/ 12th Marines and 3rd Bn, 12th Marines in 1974-1975. Then to 29 Palms, MCB, California with the 1st Field Artillery Group, FMF, ie 1st FAG. As a Ground Radio Repairmen. As they say in the Corps the King of the Battle is Artillery and the Queen of battle is the Grunts. Gotta love these guys. Better to ride than walk I’d say. Semper Fidelis Marines.
Ahhh....Good ol Ft Sill.....13B here....M110A2 and M109A4 and A6
Never a toad !
The Army is just way too awesome
懐かしいけん引式203ミリ榴弾砲の火砲操作です、アメリカ軍のですが！よく残っていましたね、火砲の重さが16トンあります！ジャキアップし上げたり下げたり、大変ですね😂、今は自動ですが昔は手動です、砲弾は約100キロありますから4人ではこび装填棒で砲身に押し込みます、砲弾を装填し発射します、旧式火砲です、今は最新鋭の203ミリ自走榴弾砲です
Field artillery the king of battle. No regrets in ever having served. But I do not miss it at all.
I lived in Elgin Oklahoma in the 1960s. I seen all of these Guns in action on FT Sill training ranges.
Artillery looks like it would be very fun and exciting
That SPH later became one of the most popular M109A2 with 155mm Cal 55 barrel!
I got to see Army Reserve M110 8 inch Howitzers fire during Desert Storm and a few times at Fort Carson. Oh Lord they were loud!
I was 13B10, In 85, I went to 1st AD, 1Bn 22Fa in Nuremberg. M109A2. Loved it.
We had the copperhead then, and I just heard the A7 STILL has 1 or 2 copperheads on hand as well!
I have to say tho.. The power packs for the A2 SUCKED! I always said there should just be a generator to run the gun systems while emplaced... now we do. your welcome.
Also, go get me some hydraulic cherry juice for the gun, from the Cook. He knows what to use...
Qq11qqqq1
@@khahuynh5443u i
I was next to a battery of 8 inch Howitzers and 175 mm "Long Toms" in VN in '68. When they shot over our area you needed to be sure there was nothing on shelves near your head.
Good documentary film.Thank you for uploading it.
Brings back memories.
Edward Batting w
Ft Sill?
US ARMY had always had a tradition in field artillery,even Germans were stunned by its amazing firepower in the field
And accuracy.
The king of the battlefield. Hail to the king baby!!! Thankyouverymuch.
Whoahh
Excellent beautiful
13E40 from70 to 78. One tour in Nam. Nice to see Ft. SILL again and watch some old guns shoot.
36:40 Werner von Braun says...."YES"!!!!!!!!!
GyyG will ty vyv. G. GGvgvt. G vgyv G t Vy day Vy vy vvvgg the season they are free and
@@sivphech1509 cdidfhcuvfsjhc
,®©ω¢¤⊙℃℉
EXCELENTE DOCUMENTAL
Was Trained on the 105,,mm ended shooting the 155mm bother towed and Mobile!! Fired Thousands of rounds!
Used to call the 155 towed 'pig iron'.
Should of just called it "TOAD"
@@martinkerker1190 We called the 155mm towed gun 'pig iron' because of its weight and difficulty to handle. If memory serves, the spades weighed close to a hundred pounds each.
They showed the Honest John Rocket at 1.23 min, I was in a Honest John rocket Unit. We had two rockets if we fired both of them we became an infantry company that's what they used to say. they also showed the corporal missal before it they were in the same Casern I was in. In the states I was in a 155 outfit in the 1st infantry Div.
Where was you stationed? Germany, korea, states?
8 inch Howitzer....holy shit
@@thetreblerebelAnsbach, Germany.
More or less the same story in modern MLRS units.
I was trained as an MLRS crewman. Spent most of my time deployed mucking around as an infantryman in both howitzer and MLRS units.
eogg25 Were you MOS trained as both cannon and missile crewman? If not, we're you just OJT for training?
Nhìn lại cảnh chiến tranh thấy thương cho cả hai.ai cũng đâu thương.tai sao ko cũng nhau hòa hợp nhìn thấy ai bị thương và chết thật thấy đâu lòng qua
My grandfather won medals for raining down this kind of ordinance onto Nazis in world war two.
I honor his memory by hating the nazis and fascists he fought against every bit as much as he did.
Lol, edgy boi.
@@blackirish781 Stfu nazi lover
@@Spade_1917 he definitely is an edgy boy
Noises So you don’t like democrats. Me neither.
Won medals? All by himself? Hmmm. Pity most of these weapons weren't available in WWII.
Chiến tranh VN từ 1965-1975 cũng có xử dụng 105mm -155mm và 175mm song cùng thể loại những model mới tiện lợi hơn đáp ứng yểm trợ nhanh hơn không thấy xuất hiện
Noticed the creases in the uniforms
Was hoping to see Davy Crockett, but no such luck...was that more an Infantry weapon considering the RR as we had both 90mm and 106mm, anyone know?
6/37th and 1/14th FA veteran MLRS/HIMARS.
The 6/37th in Korea use to use M110 before it switched to MLRS
The Germans built some good shit for us, back in the day.
@Andrew Callaway He didn't say developed or howitzers, he said shit. They did build some good shit.
The German did not invent rocket technology... Ballard, a US engineer, was the one who perfected the uses of gyros and ballistics...the German, in their war effort, invested heavily in this technology and perfected it... while again, the US, Canada and Britain perfected the atomic weapon...
@Andrew Callaway youre racist
Awesome upload, thank you. Question For the experts out there: if the the maximum elevation of the 175 mm m107 gun is 1166 mills, what would be the elevation of a single mill, if we measure it in millimeters? Just asking here fellas.
@Rosales Efra
I believe that a full circle is 6400 mils! So 1166 mils is 10.9 degrees .
1.0 millimetre!
Actual field artilleryman here: The Mil does not equal "1 millimeter" it's closest metric equivalent is the micrometer.
But to answer the question: 1 Mil = 0.0254 mm
@pyrotechnic5254 that’s what I said...
And I’m aware what a mil is...seeing as I was in the field artillery
A true miliradian is one thousandth of a radian, which is (1/2π turns) or 57.296°. Therefore a milirad is about 0.057° or 3.438'
However, NATO member state armed forces define a mil as (1/6400 turns), 0.056°, or 3.375'
1166 NATO mil is 65.5875°
Hopefully this covers everything relevant
Big boy model rockets!
La artillería de la democracia. Unos disparan más democracia qué otros, depende de las dimensiones del país donde la lleven.
That must have been filmed in early '65. The stripes changed from yellow to OD about then. I was in an M-110 battalion, I-Corp, Korea.
No we still had black/ yellow name and us army in 1975
Served in Cu Chi 1966-67 A Battery 13th. Artillery 25th. Infantry 155 self propelled. Welcome home my brothers- God bless you.
My dad was in The 13th too. SSG Fred Wright. God bless n thank you for your service
That war was a crime of american regime.
Дредноут Императоров shut up you pussy.
@@freddiefalseflagger7545 STFU clitoris.
I was in C Battery of the 13th in 2008-2009 it's an MLRS unit now...or was...I think they may have switched to HIMARS, which is just a wheeled version of MLRS.
Over 50 years ago and still some serious stuff. They used to select the biggest guys for artillery from the recruits, I asked but they said too small.
@Liam Murphy
I enlisted in the Arty and was always 155’s. I was only 5’5” 140lbs. I was on M109’s in Germany and then towed 198’s at Ord. Yeah, it started to kick my butt humping 90lb projos. Going thru PNOC they always gave me the M60 or radio to carry even tho we had 6’ tall grunts in our squad. Go figure, huh?
I was 5'7 155 when I enlisted for Cannon Crewmember 13B. Changed MOS and became 13 FOX calling it in.
@Angry Patriot
I never thought of changing MOS. Smart move...I did 4 yrs busting my ass. Haha
@@ms1535 Whoahh 👍
2:47 what happens to me when I think about Dee Shannell lol
They're all gone now (from U.S. inventory anyway) except the new generation M109 155 SP howitzer.
@pyrotechnic5254 I believe so. By new generation I mean the one with GPS positioning and onboard fire solutions computer. Also has a travel lock mechanism for the tube that can be operated from within. The crew never has to go outside and has the ability to do quick fire missions at any time. There might be other improvements but I can't remember. I did see these being demonstrated live fire at Fort Sill.
The original (well, compared to the newer version, that is a longer barrel so I guess the A1?) was the one I trained on. All gun data was generated and sent by the FDC. Later on I was the FDO for an 8" howitzer battery.
на начале и на конце римскими цифрами написано 1965й год МСМLXV
M=1000
CM=900
LX=60
V=5
1000+900+60+5=1965
King of the battlefield
13F ooorahh
Lessons well learned from the WERMACHT!:))
Ok.
Bang qua lửa dan tập 18
A btry 1/84th FA. Fort Lewis Wa. 1972-76 155 howitzer towed.
A btry 7/9th FA USAR, late '80s-early '90s. 8" howitzer self-propelled.
HHB 3/11 FA Ft. Lewis 1988-1990 M1989 towed, then 1/157 FA 1991-2005 Colorado ARNG M110A2 SP to M109A5 to M270 MLRS.
I wonder how many of these are still in use? I am sure alot of updates on computers etc.
None of them are in use anymore, every howitzer you see here has been discontinued and replaced
Hail to to the king.
Rapid fire
Germans done crazy things as well in field of artillery. One prime example was the 80cm Dora Railgun
Big for nothing railgun
Massive waste of resources, (manufacturing, materials and manpower,) for little return on effectiveness.
@@13thBear Perhaps overall, however, it did help to crack the stout defenses of Sebastopol during Barbarossa. Those piercing Rockling (Sp)? shells, you know?
80cm? Try 800cm. Guys could actually crawl around inside the tube and clean it. Yeah, Dora was big.
Those rockets, were they ever used in actual war?ie vietnam,balkans etc.
3/37TH SARGEANT MISSLE ARTILLERY 1968
Sergeant
The title card at the beginning of this reel says this film is from 1965 (MCMLXV) not 1966 (MCMLXVI). I am averse to being a pedant about such things but we’re talking about history here, where dates are important.
Vua chiến trường.
Why even have towed versions of the Howitzers if they could all be self-propelled?
This was a period of transition in the Army. A lot of the towed systems were holdovers from WWII and Korea. Self propelled systems were beginning to emerge based on developing doctrine to counter the Soviet Union. By the time I entered the Army in 1986, we were down to 7 main artillery systems (105T, 155T, 155SP, 8"SP, MLRS, Lance, Pershing) which soon went to 5 with the retirement of Lance and Pershing (the weapon that won the Cold War). It was a doctrine known as Air-Land implemented during the '80s that reorganized the composition of artillery formations and tactics.
lol watch one of the rifles fall of the rack at 19:35 because of the recoil , they thought no one would notice in the edit, lol
Good eye! Someone didn’t secure their M14.
Anybody noticed nobody was wearing a ear protection?
@Dave WHAT?!
Love these old tech cold war films. Intense manual labor, time consuming human input on dials, wheels, jacks, weather vanes, trucks, hoists, bolts, ratchets, hammers...all for just one lousy shot! Gotta like the narrators too - machine gun delivery and puurfeckt dickshun!
Pro tip. It's actually the same way now. Just more accurate
"One of the greatest casualty-producing agencies on the field of battle"
No longer considered a PC motto anymore
Whiskey Richard "Artillery kills, infantry occupies."
@@richardkirka5977 Now with GPS
I understand that artillery is the king of the battlefield, but I just don't get a sense of how the whole thing merges together...arti, tanks, grunts.. anyone have a link to a good explanation video?
Tankers and infantry get their asses kicked then call the King to save them.
Não só do exército mas das três Forças Militar dos Estados Unidos da América
даже на 105йнет досыльника у паладина вообще картузное заряжэание
Is the Cruise missile now part of the artillery armament?
The MLRS is. I dont remember if those are capable of firing cruise missiles or not but seems like I read something that said it was. I coould be wrong though.
в великой америке в1966году гаубица 203мм ипаладин используют картузное заряжание паладин использует досих пор модификация а7 2020год
Jesus, all of these are nuclear capable. Imagine If we engaged wars with nuclear artillery.
I was attached to a Lance battalion
Gomack Mc I started out 6/33 lance.. moved to the 9th missile group. Barracked in the 1/12.
Artillery 💥 when smaller guns are just not enough 🤣👍 king of battle self propelled
Could a self propelled artillery piece use it's gun in defense of it's self say against another tank?
No, the tank could fire all it's ammo while the SP was setting spades. Direct fire in ambush is done.
Yes, they can, and have...in Desert Storm and at least once that I know of in 2003 during OIF. The unit I first went to was a Paladin unit. They had some encounters during the initial invasion of Iraq where direct fire was needed.
Source: Was a field artilleryman from 2005 to 2013.
@@jackbelk8527 you don't need the spade to fire directly. You do need it when you plan on sustained fire. The Paladin is quite capable of taking out tanks if need absolutely needs to.
@@jackbelk8527 You don’t know Jack! Jack.
You could, but it would probably just piss off the tank even in the unlikely event you could hit it.
Nhược điểm của pháo 175 ly , vya chuến trường là bắn qua chậm ... thua xa phái 130 ly của Liên Xô củ , nên đấu phâo đaaus không lại pháo130 ly
Army cool
Those direct arty on targets are staaaaaaaaaaaaged. No way any round would take that long to hit at that distance
what is the helicopter model? at 22:52
Late to the party but I think it's a Sikorsky S-56
@@davidhwang4221 Yes l believe you are correct. Called the Mojave. I think it has a piston engine. Long ass time ago
S-56 was the company designation of the helo. The military designation was CH-37 Mojave for those wondering.
It was basically obsolete when it entered service. Only used until turbo-shaft heavy-lift helicopters could be developed to replace it like the Skycrane.
Interesting tidbit of info: There WAS a variant of the CH-56 used as an Airborne Early Warning platform. Basically replaced the cargo bay with a radar system.
I wouldn't want to be on the business end of one of these
I want automatic 406mm infantry support cannon.
For home defence obviously.
такую делал грабин но неполучилось
да
@@user-xb2jm9ms4d именно 406-мм автоматическую? К своему стыду пока даже не прочитал его мемуары, впрочем не факт, что там об этом есть.
105самоходснята думали ее заменит м60 но их порезали щас только немног на шасси страйкер итока прямо наводкой
Red legs all the way. Ft Sill Oklahoma👍🇺🇸
Date on the film is 1965. MCMLXV
M = 1000 CM = 900 LX = 60 V = 5 1965
We are now MMXX.
Eu sou fã do exército milita Americano Estados Unidos
In 1966, even your M1911A1 was nuclear-capable.
Honest John and little John....geez..way too complex and involvement in the field.
Not really...
Boy those rocket batteries were labor intensive & time consuming. No doubt those artillery men were happy when they came up w/ the MLRS.
Speaking as an MLRS crewman...eh...it basically just turned us into infantry units. There's been very little need for MLRS batteries in recent conflicts. In fact, in the 3 years I spent in Iraq, not once did we ever bring, or use, out field pieces, and I served in both Paladin and MLRS units.
@pyrotechnic5254 ...what?
@pyrotechnic5254 If you're talking about the TMDP that didn't demil the launchers...just the older missiles, with most of them being reconstituted into new systems. The MLRS and HIMARS are both still in active service...so I have no idea what you're talking about. In fact MLRS is getting an upgrade. Wherever you're getting your info from, it's bad info.
@pyrotechnic5254 you can probably still find the slide show from it online. Was a big thing that went out around 2015ish. They had to reconstitute the old missiles because the fuel can only be contained in them safely for so long before it's dangerous to handle them, nevermind fire them.
Plus with the new upgrades, they came with new missile systems, so there was little need to keep the older ones around save for training maybe, if they weren't too old.
Thanks for the booms, gun bunnies!
Ông cha chúng tôi vẫn sống vs chiến đấu hết mình để đổi hoà bình như ngày hôm nay
м 101м из за отсутствия нормальног вертолет а вдесантно ваорианте соднобрусным лафетом снижат сектор обтрела иархаично
на 105мм поршневойзатвор открывается вручную убожество от которого отказались на советских пушкахокончательно к 1960году
HQ AND HQ BATTERY
Ok
71-74, 2nd & 39th FA 3rd ID.🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Was the Sgt Major ever fired in anger?
Nope. It was part of the nuclear deterrent and mostly deployed in Europe and Korea. They did consider producing HE, Biological, Chemical, and a few other variants but, they were never produced in any real quantity. The development of cruise missiles and more cost-effective field artillery platforms more or less made it obsolete.
The 105 looks WAY better in the slick old OD
Looks like a Sikorsky CH-37 Mojave
The date at the start of the video in Roman numerals says 1965 and not 1966.
I was in a 175MM self propelled gun unit and arrived in Vietnam in October of 1965. B Btry 2nd Battalion 32 Artillery. I went from Fort Sill, Ok with the unit on the USS Gordon.
Cool story.
Q raro q enventaron cañones de repetision automático
19:33 Traverse dude forgot to secure the rifle rack for recoil.
Why do they use metric measurements?
Because the rest of the world, particularly NATO with whom we needed a common standard, does. And the metric system is a much easier method to deal with tactically.
1965
Early. Didn't the stripes and name tags change color in spring '65?
get ready for nam
попытка заряжать гаубицу унитарными снаядами несерьезна
黃皮膚族也有機甲車会海航，未來必可機甲車大軍遠洋海战海盜，，，So。
203ягаубица выглядит вообщеубого наша б4развертывалась сходу ибила дотылинии манергейма а это надо разворачивать минуту
м114 тот же поршневойзатвор откотрого всср отказались на д20 сразупосле войны 1946а амеры 20лет возились идосих пор на паладине и м 777 стоит
амеры артой не марочились у них главное в-52.
@@vika4858 cкока было сколько сбили
Hello
Chinito gueón
🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱😈
Viet Nam 😍
FORT SILL OKLAHOMA I presume...
Most of it yeah. It was a shithole then, it's still a shithole now.
Pretty much, except for the missile shots. Those were probably from White Sands.
Vũ khí Mỹ tôi tan vậy mà vẫn thua Việt Nam
Why skip the M40 "Long Tom"?
Too heavy , Swedes used in bandkanon
@@jari2018 bandkanon?
As in, "doo-doo-doo, doo-doo-doo doo doo
BANG!"
?
@@WhiskeyRichard. what is a bandkanon??
Because the M40 left service duty shortly after Korea. Probably wasn't being fielded anymore by the time the film was made.
CONVENTIONAL OR NUCLEAR