If you search for MIT Lincoln Laboratory Introduction to radar systems, you will encounter multiple videos which go over very advanced topics relating to radar. E.G. - RCS calculations from a very high level is calculating integrals from Maxwell equatons. It's not for everyone but if you want that depth, the information is out there. Mr. Gatcomb is a wizard with all of it. th-cam.com/play/PLUJAYadtuizA8RC2Qk8LfmiWA56HZsk9y.html
What can you say about radar being detected by the enemy team? Are some radars hard to detect by the enemy team that others. For example the radar on an F 14 versus the radar on an F 22 Is one stealthier than the other?
I mention that towards the middle. Classic radar emissions are much easier to detect with ESM, modern AESA and the like such as on the F-22 are very difficult to detect and analyze.
Huge amount of irrelevant information. The capabilities of the radar are listed in their database entries but instead of covering that you attach your own narrative about radar theory and shoehorn it into the game. For example the player only needs to know if the radar has a Ground Search feature; the theory of Doppler shift has nothing to do with the player. Instead of explaining what PESA, AESA, NCTR-NBLIST / JEM, etc entries in the database mean you expound on information not relevant to the game. Also as usual you gloss over errors (Mig-21 got eyes on the surface contact, contact ID is a feature of the radar (NCTR) not something inherent to phased arrays like you suggested, etc and so on).
Dude, why don't you go watch the videos you think are good? Obviously you dislike these videos but you seem to watch them all and then you rock up to the comments section with some unhelpful critique and lots of negativity for a guy who is just trying to help us enjoy a fucking game. You must be about 5 years old (or have the mentality of a child) if you think anyone OWES you videos to your liking. Go create the videos YOU want if you're not happy. Nobody is forcing you to watch these. Asshole.
Holy crap, i was a radar tech on a Ticonderoga class cruiser and you trigged a lot of deeply repressed memories 😂.
Finally got around to watching the whole playlist. Quite informative stuff. You've got a sub from me.
Another great overview! You'd be a wonderful educator (if you aren't already).
Really good work, yet again.
This is excellent, immensely educating and helpful, thanks!
Great video. Love all your stuff!
Thanks, useful information on radar frequencies and limitations
If you search for MIT Lincoln Laboratory Introduction to radar systems, you will encounter multiple videos which go over very advanced topics relating to radar. E.G. - RCS calculations from a very high level is calculating integrals from Maxwell equatons. It's not for everyone but if you want that depth, the information is out there. Mr. Gatcomb is a wizard with all of it. th-cam.com/play/PLUJAYadtuizA8RC2Qk8LfmiWA56HZsk9y.html
Thank you!
Hey good stuff man! Subbed
Another great tutorial m8, thanks
What can you say about radar being detected by the enemy team?
Are some radars hard to detect by the enemy team that others. For example the radar on an F 14 versus the radar on an F 22
Is one stealthier than the other?
I mention that towards the middle. Classic radar emissions are much easier to detect with ESM, modern AESA and the like such as on the F-22 are very difficult to detect and analyze.
This is a really good video.
Never mind it is fixed now, thanks
Nice video i like how you speak
Why is the video quality in 360p and not in HD at least 720p
You can change it to anything you want, up to and including 1080p at 60frames. Click the gear in he lower right corner of he video.
Huge amount of irrelevant information. The capabilities of the radar are listed in their database entries but instead of covering that you attach your own narrative about radar theory and shoehorn it into the game. For example the player only needs to know if the radar has a Ground Search feature; the theory of Doppler shift has nothing to do with the player. Instead of explaining what PESA, AESA, NCTR-NBLIST / JEM, etc entries in the database mean you expound on information not relevant to the game. Also as usual you gloss over errors (Mig-21 got eyes on the surface contact, contact ID is a feature of the radar (NCTR) not something inherent to phased arrays like you suggested, etc and so on).
Dude, why don't you go watch the videos you think are good? Obviously you dislike these videos but you seem to watch them all and then you rock up to the comments section with some unhelpful critique and lots of negativity for a guy who is just trying to help us enjoy a fucking game. You must be about 5 years old (or have the mentality of a child) if you think anyone OWES you videos to your liking. Go create the videos YOU want if you're not happy. Nobody is forcing you to watch these. Asshole.
@@WmSrite-pi8ck You're right, he has the wrong opinion and shouldn't be allowed to express it. Thanks for showing me the light.
@@JacobK01 Don't forget to cite your answers. Answers without citations will be treated as plagiarism.