Wow, that's not a small difference. It's >20% for average FPS anyway. 1% lows seems to fare a little better on the 9800x3d too. Nice comparison, straight to the point.
Last Rust benchmarks you did comparing 7800X3D to 14900K were nice to have in order to make a choice, but extremely inconsistent in testing methodology. You just randomly roamed across servers and called that a head-to-head comparison, including death and loading screens which greatly affect 1% lows. Glad to see you used Outpost footage to standardize this time around. I also appreciate the early testing, cheers. This is a very telling comparison.
thanks for the nice feedback. I don't play rust as a main so I've been taking suggestions from people who will let me know what is important to see respectfully. (A lot of toxic A-holes yelling at me too lol)
@@pyurologieAlso could you try a Main and a Monthly official Server for realistic results? (Example: Rustoria US Large and Rustoria US Main) Good luck making it to outpost though lol
U are the best! I thought that someone will upload this comparison maybe a month or more after ther release of 9800x3d. I think i might upgrade my current 7600 to 9800x3d instead 7800x3d
appreciate you sharing the info in a respectful way. so many ppl being toxic that i didn't make one. i'm not a rust main lol, i didn't freaking know that! hahah so sue me. i'll make a benchmark and upload a new comparison soon since i started tuning the 98, should have even better results.
@@pyurologie you're totally good! I myself am more interested in seeing the performance on regular servers either way. Id also like to thank you for your work, you are the only channel I know that posts many different high quality tests on rust and I appreciate seeing it!
i dont think so and it would only make things worse for this exact cpu because all the so called 'x3d boost technology' does is it disabled cache-less chiplet and hyperthreading. so on an 7900x3d you're ending up with just 6c6t that simply struggle to run the game smoothly while tossing away 2/3rds of multi core performance as well
The 1% lows are still not great. ~90FPS is like 1/3 of avg. I have similar results with my 9800X3D. I had 7700 before and the 1% lows are basically the same and kind of noticeable ingame (I am locked at 144FPS)
Ok now tarkov same comparison at 1440p 😅😅😅🎉🎉. I have a 7900GRE, you think its worth upgrading from the 7800x3d (for tarkov)or am i gonna be GPU bound anyway?
1080p is cpu bound - 1440p takes it a bit more to the gpu where ur 3070 is most likely fine - 4k is where the gpu becomes the main component, as you can see in the 4k test, the gpu useage will be way higher than in any other mode. I would even sayl that the 4090 is bottleneck right now to get more fps :D rtx 5000 series will fix this
would you say that it played smoother? Like less frame spikes, its not the peak or average that impresses me, it would be if the gameplay smoothness improved
@@Bellonii Precisely, this game has pretty aggressive lows especially when rendering in big bases on the map or in player dense regions so having a 9800x3d with less power limits and a more stable ghz boost would help in that metric, not a whole heap but this benchmark has demonstrated some improvement except for the massive 1% low variance in the 1080p outdoors test, I find it really weird that the 7800x3d 1% low is 37fps which is most likely because of the slight variance in area they in on the side by side and maybe he rendered in a really big base on the 7800x3d test. I own a 7800x3d never seen any 37fps 1% lows when in general 200 pop regions without big bases nearby. They did a really great job of the outpost comparisons making them indentical and those are good results we can go off, not so sure on the outdoor one tho.
@@pearce_nz there are always frametime spikes in Rust moving across the map, depending on how many assets/players are nearby. These spikes bring down the 1% displayed even if it stays in a generally higher range during gameplay. I wish there was a way to just show current 1% instead of a rolling average, this would be better to show how it really is. Either way, yes with the 9800X3D, it was less "spiky" and felt smoother overall. You could probably improve smoothness by capping FPS as well, I'm just running uncapped to see what numbers will be produced.
Buy yourself a GPU then save for 4090 soon 5090 then get CPU, no need CPU if Ur GPU limited I'm running 4090 with 5800x3d in 4k 240hz and im GPU limited most games
Wow, that's not a small difference. It's >20% for average FPS anyway. 1% lows seems to fare a little better on the 9800x3d too. Nice comparison, straight to the point.
Almost constant 35%+ fps is insane generational leap
Last Rust benchmarks you did comparing 7800X3D to 14900K were nice to have in order to make a choice, but extremely inconsistent in testing methodology. You just randomly roamed across servers and called that a head-to-head comparison, including death and loading screens which greatly affect 1% lows. Glad to see you used Outpost footage to standardize this time around. I also appreciate the early testing, cheers. This is a very telling comparison.
thanks for the nice feedback. I don't play rust as a main so I've been taking suggestions from people who will let me know what is important to see respectfully. (A lot of toxic A-holes yelling at me too lol)
@@pyurologieAlso could you try a Main and a Monthly official Server for realistic results?
(Example: Rustoria US Large and Rustoria US Main)
Good luck making it to outpost though lol
Can you try 7600x on rustoria us main? Thinking of purchasing it would love to see the performance
U are the best! I thought that someone will upload this comparison maybe a month or more after ther release of 9800x3d. I think i might upgrade my current 7600 to 9800x3d instead 7800x3d
The difference in FPS at 4K is mind blowing.
Great comparison .. can't wait to see more
thanks bro!!
Nice job thank you.
All hail the new CPU King of Rust.
Why didnt the average fps drop when going drom 1080p > 1440p > 4k? I thought increasing rwsolution would have a big impact?
Game is CPU heavy, not GPU heavy, GPU literally can handle any rust graphics without affecting frames
You can run a performance benchmark in rust, but you need to create it yourself or download it first
appreciate you sharing the info in a respectful way. so many ppl being toxic that i didn't make one. i'm not a rust main lol, i didn't freaking know that! hahah so sue me. i'll make a benchmark and upload a new comparison soon since i started tuning the 98, should have even better results.
@@pyurologie you're totally good! I myself am more interested in seeing the performance on regular servers either way. Id also like to thank you for your work, you are the only channel I know that posts many different high quality tests on rust and I appreciate seeing it!
Doing the lords work! Proc is a beast!
Was the X3D boost technology on for any of these comparisons?
I wonder the same.
i dont think so and it would only make things worse for this exact cpu because all the so called 'x3d boost technology' does is it disabled cache-less chiplet and hyperthreading. so on an 7900x3d you're ending up with just 6c6t that simply struggle to run the game smoothly while tossing away 2/3rds of multi core performance as well
@@sussinbussin1 wait so if I disable HT myself anyways, it is the same thing as the X3D boost technology that is coming out?
try with higher speed ram , heard it should help the 1% lows if running beyond 7600-8000mhz, 2x24gb tends to be more stable and less latency
Hello, rust now have benchmark maps, i think its be better then running around map and outpost
oh really? do you know where i can find them?
Waiting for same comparison in tarkov
Already exists
Hey Pyur, can you do the same comparison in tarkov?
One already exists
the best bench on the whole internet
The 1% lows are still not great. ~90FPS is like 1/3 of avg. I have similar results with my 9800X3D. I had 7700 before and the 1% lows are basically the same and kind of noticeable ingame (I am locked at 144FPS)
Ok now tarkov same comparison at 1440p 😅😅😅🎉🎉.
I have a 7900GRE, you think its worth upgrading from the 7800x3d (for tarkov)or am i gonna be GPU bound anyway?
One already exists
does 9800x3d trigger EAC? i dont wanna get banned for enjoying rust too much
😂
just got the 9800x3d, only running it with a 3070 gpu and im getting 200-280 fps in game on a week old 200 pop server
funny how im getting the same fps as you with a 3070 when u got a 4090
in 1440 yeah, in 4K native is where you'd see the difference probably.
1080p is cpu bound - 1440p takes it a bit more to the gpu where ur 3070 is most likely fine - 4k is where the gpu becomes the main component, as you can see in the 4k test, the gpu useage will be way higher than in any other mode. I would even sayl that the 4090 is bottleneck right now to get more fps :D rtx 5000 series will fix this
would you say that it played smoother? Like less frame spikes, its not the peak or average that impresses me, it would be if the gameplay smoothness improved
the 0.1 and 1% lows are what makes gameplay smooth.
@@Bellonii Precisely, this game has pretty aggressive lows especially when rendering in big bases on the map or in player dense regions so having a 9800x3d with less power limits and a more stable ghz boost would help in that metric, not a whole heap but this benchmark has demonstrated some improvement except for the massive 1% low variance in the 1080p outdoors test, I find it really weird that the 7800x3d 1% low is 37fps which is most likely because of the slight variance in area they in on the side by side and maybe he rendered in a really big base on the 7800x3d test. I own a 7800x3d never seen any 37fps 1% lows when in general 200 pop regions without big bases nearby. They did a really great job of the outpost comparisons making them indentical and those are good results we can go off, not so sure on the outdoor one tho.
@@pearce_nz there are always frametime spikes in Rust moving across the map, depending on how many assets/players are nearby. These spikes bring down the 1% displayed even if it stays in a generally higher range during gameplay. I wish there was a way to just show current 1% instead of a rolling average, this would be better to show how it really is. Either way, yes with the 9800X3D, it was less "spiky" and felt smoother overall. You could probably improve smoothness by capping FPS as well, I'm just running uncapped to see what numbers will be produced.
@@pyurologie Thanks for the explanation ❤️
great video
Appreciate the feedback!
thats a huge difference, Im planning to upgrade my r5 7600x to the 9800x3d, though I have a 6700 xt
Same! I scooped a 7900xt on sale though. R5 7600x isnt cutting it for rust
Buy yourself a GPU then save for 4090 soon 5090 then get CPU, no need CPU if Ur GPU limited I'm running 4090 with 5800x3d in 4k 240hz and im GPU limited most games
How much fps do u get on rust with 7600x?
Goated.
my bro got good sources
@@tanillop indeed
Amazing!.-
Too bad. Scalpers bought all of the stocks.
Plz do test pubg aswell , Pubg is one the most played games and one the most cpu heavy games.
PUBG comparison please
ok i'll add one
@@pyurologie Thanks, in competitive settings too please :)
Look the comparacion price quality😂😂😂🎉 amd 7😂😂
You are great
no, you are GREAT! thank you so much