Just got my 1858 Remington New Army Conversion today! First thing I do with a new firearm is to familiarize myself with the safety features, basic function, and disassembly/care of the weapon....I was delighted to find that your video covered everything! Thank you Sir!
Glad that I could help.. The 1858 is a fine shooter. I plan on reviewing the 1875 and 1890 at some time in the future. Thanks for watching, and I hope that you enjoy your 1858.
Well made video on the 1858 Remington New Army Revolver! I appreciate the time you put into this review. I'm definitely going to save up for this fine piece of steel!
Thanks for watching. The 1858 Remington New Army Conversion by Uberti is, indeed, a fine piece of work. I am looking forward to also reviewing the 1875 Remington "Improved Army" and 1890 Remington "New Model Army" sometime in the future.
Love the Remington new model Army revolvers. I have 3 of them and a Taylors conversion cylinder in 45 Colt and I load my own cartridges with the Lee Loading kit. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks for watching. I have the 1858 in both percussion and cartridge conversion, the 1875, and the 1890. I do favor the Remington over the Colt in many ways.
I apologize for taking so long to respond; I must have missed your comment. Thanks for watching and commenting. I hope that you enjoy shooting yours as much as I enjoy shooting mine. I have a fondness for these reproductions.
Very nice video! I've got the Black Powder & percussion cap version, with another cylinder which allows .45LC to be shot as well. It's a bit more hassle (well, actually a lot more,) but it's nice to have the options. To shoot .45LC I have to remove the cylinder, take the top off the conversion cylinder, load the cylinder & then reinsert it into the gun. I'm guilty of loading six instead of five, because the only place I shoot it is at an indoor range, and it takes so long to get loaded & reassembled I want every shot I can get without wasting any time. I'd love to shoot it with the black powder cylinder, I did years ago, but there's no place near where I live where I can do that now. When using black powder it's most impressive, the cloud of smoke really adds to the drama!
Thanks for watching and commenting. I have the C&B version, as well. It is a hoot (and pain when reloading) to shoot and I can only shoot it at the outdoor range that I go to. Rather than going through the converting from C&B, I just bought another in .45 Colt - the one that I reviewed here. I have been in the habit of only loading five cartridges that it carries over even to more modern single-actions, like the Ruger Blackhawk, Super Blackhawk and, yup, even the lowly Ruger Single-Six. I guess I have to blame that mild anal side of me.😁
@@RangeRoninChronicles Thanks for replying, and no, you're quite right to load only five. If I was ever to carry mine loaded in its holster (really neat-looking Western gunbelt with cartridge loops) that's the only way I'd carry it, just for extra safety. But at an indoor range it's just sitting on the benchtop or in my hand, so there's little chance it's going to discharge accidentally. I sure wish there was an accessible outdoor range near me, I used to love shooting outdoors especially at dusk, when the muzzleflash & the billowing smoke was so incredible!
@@deniswauchope3788 I gotcha! The outdoor range that I go to closes at 1800 hours. However, with seasonal change coming soon, I may be able to get some low-light video. I'll have to look into that.😁
Thanks for watching and your comment. I appreciate that. I have always liked the Remington revolvers over the Colt. I consider them the "Ruger" of the time; built like tanks and built to last.
I have this 1858 revolver. I also reload my own 200 gr rnft bullets. This gun is a God Sin, and exceptionally fine gun. Just love shooting it. Your vid is awesome, and not a lot of vids on this 1858 revolver. I am a stickler on cleaning, so as my gun is cleaned and lubed. Retired military man, clean and lube is a must. Thank You, Master Sargent Don Scow.
Thanks for watching, and thank you for your service...this coming from a former SSG E-6. I also have the 1858 in percussion, the 1875 cartridge, and the 1890 Police, but this one is my sweetheart. Reviews on those sometime in the future. I don't reload at the present time, but I am trying to talk a friend of mine who does into fixing me up with some "Cowboy" loads in .45 LC to feed my beasts.
Nicely done video. I had a Lyman Rem. 58. It had that same dovetailed front sight. But all the other brands did. The man I bought it from said to clean it after every couple cylinders. I loaded it full power with 3F, .457 ball, and lots of ball lube. It never skipped a beat as I'd shoot for hours. Only thing I don't like is the ejector. I never used the ejector on my SAA Uberti. I'd just tap the rear of the grip against my palm and they'd pop out. Know my daughter wants a couple of these with 5 inch barrels to go with her 66 carbine. The 58 was so easy to disassemble, clean, grease and put back together. Great gun. I miss mine.
Thanks for watching and commenting. I also have the Uberti cap and ball version of the 1858 Remington that I am looking forward to reviewing one of these days, along with several other percussion revolvers in the collection. I am still experimenting with single-shot percussion pistol right now. I love shooting these replicas; they are dirty when fired, slow to load, take more care when loading, but there is a sense of satisfaction when they do fire.
Fantastic video presentation. I own this firearm also. I unload the brass by tilting the muzzle up, open the gate rotate the cylinder, give a little shake, and the used cartridge falls out of the cylinder. Works very nicely and much faster than using the cartridge rod. Subscribing to your fine channel!
Thanks for watching - and subscribing! I found that your technique of unloading works with cartridges rated around 600 fps, as the brass expands very little. When I use ammunition up around 850 fps, I have to use the rod. I don't reload so I have to use whatever commercial cowboy loads I can find.
Thanks for a great video on this historic pistol, good music too! I have a 1851 Navy and 1860 Army Colt replicas but I would certainly love to add this piece to my collection. These guns make one appreciate those soldiers in the Civil War. I often say it’s like shooting history. Thanks Again and Many Blessings to You and your Family! DaveyJO in Pennsylvania
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. You would like this one or the 1875. I have the 1858 in both converted and percussion. I'll do a review on the percussion version one of these days. It takes a bit more time to ramp up to the shooting of these percussion pieces, and my indoor range doesn't appreciate my doing so. Might have to wait until I can get to my outdoor range. I'll have to mix up a fresh batch of "Moose Milk" and cylinder grease.😁 Blessings to you and yours, as well.
@@RangeRoninChronicles You’re quite welcome. Moose milk is a lovely thing after the black powder shoots. But it’s well worth it. I usually make paper cartridges that make things so much simpler at the range, especially if it’s a bit cold. I have an 1829 Army issue 69 cal, musket I so much enjoy shooting. I restored it years back and had a gunsmith check and clean the bore before I stoked it up with a half charge. When I think of long marches with a heavy pack and musket? Well I very much appreciate what all the soldiers in the Civil War endured. As I always say, it’s like shooting history. Thanks again. DaveyJO in Pennsylvania
@@RangeRoninChronicles I’d be willing to bet that you’d get hooked on a long gun! Plus you just haven’t lived until you dry ball a long gun while at the range. I did it twice in one day at the range but paper cartridges prevent dry balling. A fine week to you! DaveyJO in Pennsylvania
Very well done sir, you've definitely hooked a new fan and subscriber. Looking forward to your new videos as much as catching up and watching your previous ones too. I wish the best of health and continued inspiration and energy to produce more quality videos 😇🙏❤️
I appreciate your watching, commenting, and subscribing. I hope to continue doing these things as long as I am able, while also trying to keep things interesting and coming up with new presentation ideas.
My Uberti 1858 with the Howell cylinder also needs the 6 o’clock hold because it hits about 4 to 8 inches high at 12 to 15 yards distance but it centers well
It is possible for this replica to purchase the dedicated muzzle-loading cylinder which is slightly different from the classic 1858 cylinders because it is slightly larger. the loading lever serves precisely this purpose, not only to hold.Another thing: This revolver Is really strong,Is forged and can shoot +p cartridges without any problem. Here ,in Italy,Is proof tested at 1350 bar( 19580 psi)!It Is capable of over 1000 joules of Power without over pressure damages...
That’s the reason why I prefer using a drop in Howell conversion cylinder or a conversion repro revolver like this one instead of a colt SAA is the cylinder removal is simpler
Thanks for watching. I hope to produce a video on the 1875 and 1890 Remington revolvers in the near future. They are both of excellent quality and are excellent shooters.
Thanks for watching and commenting. Don't forget the "Dragoons." They were also part of the evolutionary chain of Colt revolvers. My collection is near complete, with only a Colt Paterson being the missing piece.I probably won't see that one in my lifetime.
Thanks for watching. I thought that the song fit the time period. I think that the song was also used in a Civil War documentary, but I can't remember which one.
I love my drop in Howell fluted .45 colt cartridge conversion cylinder in my Uberti 1858 new model army revolver. I shoot HSM .45 colt 200 grain cowboy loads from it and I made a video of myself firing my first shots from it and posted it on my channel
Thanks for watching. These reproductions are just a hoot to shoot. I have the 1858 BP revolver in .44, this one, the 1878 in .45 Colt, and the 1890 in .45 Colt. I'll post reviews of the 1858 BP revolver and 1890 at some time in the future.
Hello Range Ronin! Do you know if it's safe to use fmj rounds with these factory conversations? Thanks for a truly phenomenal video friend. It's relaxing, informative, and thorough.
Thanks for stopping by and commenting. I appreciate both. Now, to your question, "Is it safe to use FMJ rounds...?" I'll answer that by passing on information provided by Uberti: 1. NEVER use cartridges marked “High Speed” or “High Velocity”. 2. Uberti assumes no liability for incidents occurring through the use of reloaded ammunition. 3. Use ONLY COMMERCIALLY loaded cartridges that have been loaded in accordance with SAAMI-C.I.P. standards. The most commonly-used ammunition for these firearms are "Cowboy" loads, low-velocity rounds with a lead round-nose or lead semi-wadcutter bullet running around 725 to 850 fps. They may be more expensive, but I like to protect the investment that I am holding in my hand. With that said, there should be no reason why you cannot fire full metal jacketed rounds, as long as they fall within the limitations set by Uberti. Something like Fiocchi Range Dynamics .45LC 225 Grain CMJ running around 750 fps would be a good range round. Also, Ammo, Inc. Signature .45 Colt 250 grain Total Metal Jacket Brass Cased Centerfire Pistol Ammunition 45C250TMC-A50 running around 842 fps might work well. I would not put something like Underwood Ammo .45 Colt 250 Grain Full Metal Jacket Nickel Plated Brass Cased running around 960 fps through one though. This is a hunting load that is best put through something like a Ruger Blackhawk, (early) Vaquero, or even a Ruger Redhawk chambered in .45 Colt. If you have a Uberti that fires .38 Special (Colt Navy conversion model), I would follow the same guideline - keep the velocity low for plinking, regardless of the bullet used. I have shot some hand-loaded FMJ through my Uberti revolvers, but they were loaded light and worked with no issues. I hope that my answer helped.
I have been collecting and shooting Uberti revolvers for decades because of their high quality and accuracy. The reason Uberti had to add a firing pin block to .45 LC conversion revolvers was due to ridiculous safety requirements by anti-gun States like the Soviet Socialist State of Maryland, where I reside. It certainly ruined the authenticity of the revolvers, but I was able to buy them. Other requirements by the Governor of Maryland forced the Stoeger Firearms facility to flee from Accomack, MD to another State in order to stay in business. The idiot Governor was so proud of himself, he ran for President and only got 1% of the vote. A true Narcissist to the end. He never entered politics again. Damn him to hell.
Thanks for taking the time to watch an comment. While I agree that the safety takes away from the authenticity, at least Uberti did it tastefully and you would never know that its there unless you know the revolvers. I also agree that there should be term limits for any elected official or any official that is too incompetent to do the job. Don't get me started!😁
Thanks for watching. I have the Uberti Remington 1858 New Army in cap n' ball. I have not shot it yet, but will be doing a "first shots fired" video review of it at some point.
Thanks you for watching and commenting. I went thought the same quandary as you, as I also have the BP version. Not knowing whether a conversion cylinder would match, plus conversion cylinders are not cheap, I decided to invest in this one, in which I knew 99.346% that all parts would match up and be fitted properly.
@@kentwilliams3326 yes, I have several,and I've found the firing pin sits nicely between the case heads. At least on the 45 colt/ Schofield cartridges. I'm not saying that's ultra safe, but I've not had any issues with them carried that way. I've thought about machining a hole between the cylinders, to more securely hold the firing pin in that position.
Actually, the original Remington conversion chambered in .46 rimfire did not have a loading gate. They just had a cut out in the recoil shield to allow the cartridges to be loaded from the rear.
I have this revolver with the safety feature. As received the screw slot is in the horizonal position. Will turning it to vertical change the safety feature? I've owned many S.A. revolvers and understand the empty chamber. I noticed in your video your slot was vertical and you said you would never change it.
Thanks for watching and for your question. With the hammer screw in the horizontal position, the revolver will not fire, as a block prevents the hammer from going all the way forward to strike the internal firing pin. When the hammer screw is in the vertical position, the hammer is allowed to strike the internal firing pin. I have just developed the habit of load one, skip one, load four, close the door (loading gate). I do so when even firing modern single-action revolver like the Ruger, just to stay in the habit. Your hammer should have an "S" stamped into it where the safety screw is located. Turn the screw slightly counterclockwise, or until it is in the vertical position, and the safety block is off. Turn the screw clockwise to the "S" position, and you will see the safety block move forward, thus preventing the hammer from moving all the way forward..
I enjoy it. It's a big iron. I have the pietta sheriff conversion as well. They are heavy. Good on the recoil. Robust revolver. I think it's a pretty iron. Prettier than the Colt
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. This one is my favorite of the Remington revolvers that I have. Like you, I favor the Remington over the Colt.
What a shame that ealier model has mid positions on cylinder to put hammer in front position safe, but in newer model we have to put one chamber empty.
Thanks for watching and commenting. I know that the Colts had the safe position, but I am not sure if the Remington did. I'll have to research that. Just remember that when the 1873 Colt was born, it was without safety stops, and there was no firing pin block, cylinder pin block, or transfer bar safety like there is today. Different times, different minds.
There will be a review on the Uberti S&W Model 3 at some point, as well as on other Uberti reproductions. I have a heck of a backlog to get through Thanks for watching.
I never worry about leaving the hammer on an "empty chamber.' Instead, I load the cylinder with all chambers loaded and leave the hammer located in-between chambers with the firing pin holding the cylinder in place between cartridge rims.
I have a new model army made by navy arms company in 1969 but it has a U stamped on so it was made by uberti. I’m wondering if it would be worth getting a conversion cylinder for it but I’m not sure as it is pretty old but in great shape.
Thanks for watching and or your question. Here is my take on things. Many original 1858 percussion revolvers underwent conversions through Remington Arms and private gunsmiths. When the 1875 Remington was produced, a solely cartridge revolver, the 1858 models were still being converted. That is a testament to the strength of these old pieces. After I purchased this 1858 and also an 1872 Colt Open top, I became more interested in the percussion revolvers and have amassed a pretty good collection of Uberti reproductions of those revolvers in several versions and calibers. If it were the other way around, as you have, I would leave the 1858 percussion revolver as is and enjoy it for what it is - a percussion revolver, and just purchase a Uberti 1858 conversion that I know is fitted properly and properly timed and tuned. But that's just me.
Either will work. The un-fluted cylinder may have more strength, and obviously will weigh a tad more than the fluted cylinder, but not enough to make a difference, I do believe. Personally, I like the un-fluted cylinder, as it blends more into the lines and look of the revolver, which has an impressive look about it to begin with.
@@RangeRoninChronicles Thanks a lot ! I've had black powder revolvers a long time, but only recently did I think about converting them, so I didn't know much about it ! Thanks again, and thanks for not calling me dumb...ha !
Thanks for watching and for your question. While it seems robust enough for modern ammunition, I prefer to run "Cowboy" loads to save wear and tear on the revolver and for shooting pleasure. I have a Ruger Blackhawk in .45 LC that will handle the heavy stuff for more serious shooting. I can only answer your question by saying that ammunition recommendations are not mentioned in the owner's instructions. With that said, Uberti does recommend "Cowboy" loads be run in their 1873 Colt reproductions and earlier reproduction conversion revolvers like the 1860 Army. Hope this helps.
Thanks for watching and commenting. This was one of my earlier attempts at videos reviews and I had not got the hang of balancing back ground music. I may remix this one at some point.
Yup, I noticed Clint's prop gun has whats meant to be rimfire dummy ammo in one of the close-ups ... no primers. I guess he needed to put 6 quick holes in the bad guy to match the script. Thanks for your video.@@RangeRoninChronicles
@@macguru9999 Thanks for the conversation. Pale Rider was one of my favorite Eastwood movies, and was the movie that got me interested in the Remington revolvers. I have the 1858 in percussion, this one, and the 1875 Remington conversion "New Army" and the 1890. I plan a review of them, but have not passed the planning stage. Some bad acting in The Outlaw Josey Wales, but it was an entertaining movie anyway. The movie "Unforgiven" was my reason to buy a Schofield reproduction. I'll have a review on it at some point.
Agreed Pale rider and Unforgiven are my favourites too. I mainly shoot LR target but I have a nice 1873 winchester miroku. cheers@@RangeRoninChronicles
Thanks for watching. So do I. I believe the term "Long Colt" was used to differentiate between the .45 Schofield, which was essentially the .45 "Short" Colt. The Smith and Wesson Schofield would chamber the "Short" Colt but would not chamber the "Long" Colt, but the Colt Single Action Army would chamber both. Thus, when buying ammunition, early users of the Schofield and Colt SAA would have to tell the clerk which Colt ammunition they needed, short or long. So, as of today, the .45 Schofield is the .45 Short Colt, and the .454 Casull is the .45 Longer Colt. Then there is the .45 Colt "Rimless" that has become known as the .45 ACP...
Thanks for taking the time to watch the review. To answer your question, the 1858 is not available in stainless-steel, but the 1875 is available in a nickel-plated version (www.uberti-usa.com/cartridge-revolvers/top-breaks-outlaw-frontier).
I honestly lose some respect for fellow gun lovers when they "skip one" when loading revolvers whilst they have the intention of emptying the gun down range. Loading 5 is a safety rule for carrying the gun around. If you're going to empty the gun down range it is pointless to only load 5.
Thanks for watching and commenting. Ya know, everyone has their own thing. I actually can exercise the option to load anywhere from one to six rounds, or maybe even seven rounds in some DA revolvers. I might even "stagger load" a cylinder with a couple of snap caps for flinch checking. In a semi-auto, I just might insert a snap cap somewhere in the stack for a failure drill. To lose respect for someone because they load five instead of six is a pretty harsh statement to make.
It holds Six; load six and run it in a correct holster with a correct hammer strap... lost knowledge. Sad. For those of you that do not know what I am referencing -- y'all just keep your sidearm at 17% less workable than mine.
Thanks for your comment. I'll only respond by including this: "Some modern single actions have been designed to be safely carried with the hammer down over a loaded chamber-notably the post-1973 Rugers-but in cowboy action shooting the hammer must be on an empty chamber regardless of whether the particular revolver is safe to carry with a full boat. This technique-load one, skip one, load the remaining chambers and come to full cock, then lower the hammer on an empty chamber-will work for any single-action revolver, regardless if it is a five-, six- or eight- or nine-shot cylinder. If you have any doubt as to whether a particular single-action revolver is safe to carry with all chambers loaded, here is a simple examination. Ensuring that the gun is empty, hold the gun up with the muzzle pointed in a safe direction and carefully look at the gap between the breech-face of the revolver frame and the cylinder. If you see the firing pin protruding from the breech-face, either on its own or when you apply thumb pressure on the hammer without holding down the trigger, carry it with an empty chamber under the hammer." - How To Load A Single-Action Revolver by Dave Campbell posted on April 22, 2011 (NRA/American Rifleman)
Thanks for your comment - and watching. Sorry for the delay responding. Sometime, I don't get notified of comments. As for the music, I won't get rid of music in my videos, but I am learning how to temper it a bit and lower the volume.
Thanks for watching. You are correct, the first revolver shown is not a Remington Beals. I did not have a good picture of one when I created this review and had to substitute. I have since found a picture of a Remington Beals Navy Revolver @ www.nramuseum.org/guns/the-galleries/a-nation-asunder-1861-to-1865/case-16-union-pistols-and-revolvers/remington-beals-navy-model-revolver.aspx.
I appreciate that. I am still trying to find the right levels out for both voice-over and background music. Sometimes I use BGM and other times I don't. Convention says no background music during voice-overs. Sometimes, I just can't help myself😁
@@RangeRoninChronicles You have a fairly deep base to midrange voice. Pick a background piece that plays mostly in high registers then run it through a fairly sharp high pass filter. Set the low end to near the high end of your voice. The roll off should be at least 3db per octave, 6db might be better. Here's the general idea. If you know a musition, perhaps a piano player have them record a favorite, "Streets of Larado" perhaps. Up it an octive or two or three. Have them play it pianissimo. Run it thru a high pass to get rid of any sympathetic strings and background in your voice register. Then mix in your voice over. If you have sterio put it on one side only, probably B. That way listeners can adjust to suit; cell phones excepted, naturally. Hope the general idea helps.
Thanks for watching. Back in the day, and if you were buying .45 ammunition, a shopkeeper might ask if you wanted long or short Colt. The .45 Schofield, also referred to as .45 Smith & Wesson was a revolver cartridge developed by Smith & Wesson for their S&W Model 3 Schofield top-break revolver. It is similar to the .45 Colt cartridge, but with a shorter case and a larger rim. This, the question, "Do you want long or short Colt?"
I suggest that folks watch those as well, as I always take away something from them. This is only my opinion on and experience with a firearm that I own and shoot. Some may learn something based on my opinion and experience with any of the firearms that I review, while some may not. In fact, check out Brandon Herrera's review of the 1858 Remington @ th-cam.com/video/yC1Zc4zAOwc/w-d-xo.html.
Oh that's okay I must have been having a bad day or something. You keep playing your music and forgive me. As we are heading into terrible times for this country and the world, you take care of yourself and your family. Make sure you have plenty of supplies for your arms and stock up on nonparishable foods, water, and medical stuff. I am not getting a good feeling about things in this world. Take care Don
I think that we are in full agreement about heading into terrible times. When things will finally boil over is anyone's guess. I was told once that anything (and I believe that they meant the government) built by the people, and for the people, will fail the people. The comic strip character named Pogo said it best, "We have met the enemy and he is us". For myself, I try to abide by the "BIG 10" and stay away from the "Big 7". We could probably spend hours, if not days, discussing the issues that are assailing us on a daily basis. I am just fortunate enough, for today anyway, to have woken up on the right side of the grass and still remain optimistic that I can catch most of the curves that are thrown my way - in theory, anyway. Stay safe, my brother!
Thanks for watching and commenting. That's not necessarily true. Caps can be found, but it may take some searching on-line. When you do find them, purchase as many as you can.
Have been able to find a few cci#11 ,caps....the manufacturer of my revolvers recommends #10 caps...Remington #10 fits best but have not seen any remington caps in a couple years...I have changed nipples on my revolver to slix shot nipples...the #11 caps stay on these nipples good where they fit very loose on the factory nipples...I consider this a needed improvement on my colts because it helps prevent cap jams
I think both are great but give the edge to Uberti. The reason being is where they put their marks. Uberti having it under the loading rod is a nice touch.
If you think uberti made a mistake putting the hammer block screw on the pistol. You are a fool , i've seen many people put the hammer down on a loaded cylinder. Not everyone knows to skip a cylinder and put the hammer down on an empty cylinder.
Gee! Thanks for watching and the comment. I am far from being a fool. Having the screw safety on the hammer to prevent the firing pin from striking the primer was the best place to put it, given the revolver's design. In some Uberti 1873 Colt SAA reproductions, the cylinder pin has two grooves, The first groove allows the hammer to fall fully forward, while the second groove that is engaged when pushing the cylinder pin all the way in, prevents the hammer from falling fully forward. Your statement, " i've seen many people put the hammer down on a loaded cylinder. Not everyone knows to skip a cylinder and put the hammer down on an empty cylinder." is correct and stood on it's own merit without the insult. What is foolish, is not understanding the firearm one is handling, and that lack of understanding can get somebody hurt. While I enjoy receiving comments, I don't enjoy being insulted. I do not insult others and I expect the same from them.
It simply isn't possible to cure all the different dangerous things people do. Like everything in life, it is important to be informed, to research and to listen to the advice of those with experience. There's no cure to prevent people from doing all dangerous things. I believe your criticism too a bit too harsh even if your heart was in the right place. Many of us are looking for the most authenticly reproduced items, and, needless to say this was before the many established safety standards of today. People who aren't prepared to do their research and take safety seriously probably ought not be handling these types of guns, maybe not even the modern kinds and perhaps it's better if they handle none at all.
@@MubElbmur-ok7kz You are correct in theory, but I've seen many fools at the range. That have no idea what they're doing and in my opinion should not even own a firearm. For people who display no common sense That's what my comment was geared to.
You'll get no argument from me about some people not having sense and ought not be owning a gun. These people, no matter the precautions and safeties WILL find a way to hurt themselves and possibly others, there's no stopping them, that's what I'm saying. While I'd love for them not to own a gun, they probably ought not be driving either because they're probably a safety hazard on the roads too ... but, we've got no power over this.
You said uberti thinks we're not smarter than our forefathers and decided to install this ridiculous safety measure. That to me is a foolish statement. Today many people watch hollywood movies and take their safety tips from what they see on t v. I don't think a safety on a firearm is a bad idea for some, personally I do not use them. My comment was not meant to insult you just an eye opening statement.
Personally, I don't use the safety on these reproductions either. Even in my modern single-action revolvers, I leave the hammer resting on an unloaded chamber even though there may be a hammer block safety; It's just a habit that I choose to exercise between modern and reproduction SA revolvers. In truth, I was not comfortable making the statement, but I made it anyway fully anticipating a comment. A return comment just took longer than I expected. There is an important note in the Owner's manual; "The old-timers used to say that the safest way to carry a single-action revolver was to load only five chambers and let the hammer rest, in the safety position, on the empty sixth chamber." Resting the hammer on an empty chamber is reiterated several times. Regardless of the safety means installed, it is still up to the operator to understand and follow good safety practices with whatever firearm they are handling. I don't retract my statement. It was made in good faith with a twist of irony to it. It does lead to a somewhat good conversation, don't you think?
Well, thanks for stopping by and commenting. I give Duelist1954 a lot of credit, as he knows his stuff when it comes to BP and conversion firearms. I hope that you stick around, as I will have some more Uberti revolver reviews coming out in the future.
What? The target was set at a 10 yard distance. And yes, I have shot at targets up to 35 yards at an outdoor range. The near target was a "zoom" shot inset for my viewers to better see the hits.
Just got my 1858 Remington New Army Conversion today! First thing I do with a new firearm is to familiarize myself with the safety features, basic function, and disassembly/care of the weapon....I was delighted to find that your video covered everything! Thank you Sir!
Glad that I could help.. The 1858 is a fine shooter. I plan on reviewing the 1875 and 1890 at some time in the future. Thanks for watching, and I hope that you enjoy your 1858.
Good on ya! That's great!
@@RangeRoninChronicles
The 1875 and 1890 are even purdier, if that's possible.
Well made video on the 1858 Remington New Army Revolver! I appreciate the time you put into this review. I'm definitely going to save up for this fine piece of steel!
Thanks for watching. The 1858 Remington New Army Conversion by Uberti is, indeed, a fine piece of work. I am looking forward to also reviewing the 1875 Remington "Improved Army" and 1890 Remington "New Model Army" sometime in the future.
Love the Remington new model Army revolvers. I have 3 of them and a Taylors conversion cylinder in 45 Colt and I load my own cartridges with the Lee Loading kit.
Thanks for sharing.
Thanks for watching. I have the 1858 in both percussion and cartridge conversion, the 1875, and the 1890. I do favor the Remington over the Colt in many ways.
One of the most enjoyable and informative gun review videos I have watched. Fine job. Thank you.
Thank you, sir, for watching and your kind words.
I agree.
Thank you for a very well made and most informative video. Those Uberti conversion revolvers are very nice indeed!
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. I appreciate both.
Looking forward to taking my Piettas to the range, not only to shoot the cartridge conversions, but also in the original cap-and-ball configurations.
I apologize for taking so long to respond; I must have missed your comment. Thanks for watching and commenting. I hope that you enjoy shooting yours as much as I enjoy shooting mine. I have a fondness for these reproductions.
@@RangeRoninChronicles
Yeppir. 👍
Very nice video! I've got the Black Powder & percussion cap version, with another cylinder which allows .45LC to be shot as well. It's a bit more hassle (well, actually a lot more,) but it's nice to have the options. To shoot .45LC I have to remove the cylinder, take the top off the conversion cylinder, load the cylinder & then reinsert it into the gun.
I'm guilty of loading six instead of five, because the only place I shoot it is at an indoor range, and it takes so long to get loaded & reassembled I want every shot I can get without wasting any time. I'd love to shoot it with the black powder cylinder, I did years ago, but there's no place near where I live where I can do that now. When using black powder it's most impressive, the cloud of smoke really adds to the drama!
Thanks for watching and commenting. I have the C&B version, as well. It is a hoot (and pain when reloading) to shoot and I can only shoot it at the outdoor range that I go to. Rather than going through the converting from C&B, I just bought another in .45 Colt - the one that I reviewed here.
I have been in the habit of only loading five cartridges that it carries over even to more modern single-actions, like the Ruger Blackhawk, Super Blackhawk and, yup, even the lowly Ruger Single-Six. I guess I have to blame that mild anal side of me.😁
@@RangeRoninChronicles Thanks for replying, and no, you're quite right to load only five. If I was ever to carry mine loaded in its holster (really neat-looking Western gunbelt with cartridge loops) that's the only way I'd carry it, just for extra safety. But at an indoor range it's just sitting on the benchtop or in my hand, so there's little chance it's going to discharge accidentally. I sure wish there was an accessible outdoor range near me, I used to love shooting outdoors especially at dusk, when the muzzleflash & the billowing smoke was so incredible!
@@deniswauchope3788 I gotcha! The outdoor range that I go to closes at 1800 hours. However, with seasonal change coming soon, I may be able to get some low-light video. I'll have to look into that.😁
Great review. Answered all the questions I had on this gun. Couldn’t find much elsewhere about it. Thank you.
Thanks for watching and your comment. I appreciate that. I have always liked the Remington revolvers over the Colt. I consider them the "Ruger" of the time; built like tanks and built to last.
I have this 1858 revolver. I also reload my own 200 gr rnft bullets. This gun is a God Sin, and exceptionally fine gun. Just love shooting it. Your vid is awesome, and not a lot of vids on this 1858 revolver. I am a stickler on cleaning, so as my gun is cleaned and lubed. Retired military man, clean and lube is a must. Thank You, Master Sargent Don Scow.
Thanks for watching, and thank you for your service...this coming from a former SSG E-6. I also have the 1858 in percussion, the 1875 cartridge, and the 1890 Police, but this one is my sweetheart. Reviews on those sometime in the future. I don't reload at the present time, but I am trying to talk a friend of mine who does into fixing me up with some "Cowboy" loads in .45 LC to feed my beasts.
Nicely done video. I had a Lyman Rem. 58. It had that same dovetailed front sight. But all the other brands did. The man I bought it from said to clean it after every couple cylinders. I loaded it full power with 3F, .457 ball, and lots of ball lube. It never skipped a beat as I'd shoot for hours. Only thing I don't like is the ejector. I never used the ejector on my SAA Uberti. I'd just tap the rear of the grip against my palm and they'd pop out. Know my daughter wants a couple of these with 5 inch barrels to go with her 66 carbine. The 58 was so easy to disassemble, clean, grease and put back together. Great gun. I miss mine.
Thanks for watching and commenting. I also have the Uberti cap and ball version of the 1858 Remington that I am looking forward to reviewing one of these days, along with several other percussion revolvers in the collection. I am still experimenting with single-shot percussion pistol right now. I love shooting these replicas; they are dirty when fired, slow to load, take more care when loading, but there is a sense of satisfaction when they do fire.
Fantastic video presentation. I own this firearm also. I unload the brass by tilting the muzzle up, open the gate rotate the cylinder, give a little shake, and the used cartridge falls out of the cylinder. Works very nicely and much faster than using the cartridge rod. Subscribing to your fine channel!
Thanks for watching - and subscribing! I found that your technique of unloading works with cartridges rated around 600 fps, as the brass expands very little. When I use ammunition up around 850 fps, I have to use the rod. I don't reload so I have to use whatever commercial cowboy loads I can find.
Thanks for a great video on this historic pistol, good music too! I have a 1851 Navy and 1860 Army Colt replicas but I would certainly love to add this piece to my collection. These guns make one appreciate those soldiers in the Civil War. I often say it’s like shooting history. Thanks Again and Many Blessings to You and your Family! DaveyJO in Pennsylvania
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. You would like this one or the 1875. I have the 1858 in both converted and percussion. I'll do a review on the percussion version one of these days. It takes a bit more time to ramp up to the shooting of these percussion pieces, and my indoor range doesn't appreciate my doing so. Might have to wait until I can get to my outdoor range. I'll have to mix up a fresh batch of "Moose Milk" and cylinder grease.😁 Blessings to you and yours, as well.
@@RangeRoninChronicles You’re quite welcome. Moose milk is a lovely thing after the black powder shoots. But it’s well worth it. I usually make paper cartridges that make things so much simpler at the range, especially if it’s a bit cold. I have an 1829 Army issue 69 cal, musket I so much enjoy shooting. I restored it years back and had a gunsmith check and clean the bore before I stoked it up with a half charge. When I think of long marches with a heavy pack and musket? Well I very much appreciate what all the soldiers in the Civil War endured. As I always say, it’s like shooting history. Thanks again. DaveyJO in Pennsylvania
@@daveyjoweaver6282 I have not adventured into the long-guns yet. I am just (somewhat) graduating from single-shot percussion pistols to revolvers.
@@RangeRoninChronicles I’d be willing to bet that you’d get hooked on a long gun! Plus you just haven’t lived until you dry ball a long gun while at the range. I did it twice in one day at the range but paper cartridges prevent dry balling. A fine week to you! DaveyJO in Pennsylvania
Very well done sir, you've definitely hooked a new fan and subscriber. Looking forward to your new videos as much as catching up and watching your previous ones too. I wish the best of health and continued inspiration and energy to produce more quality videos 😇🙏❤️
I appreciate your watching, commenting, and subscribing. I hope to continue doing these things as long as I am able, while also trying to keep things interesting and coming up with new presentation ideas.
My Uberti 1858 with the Howell cylinder also needs the 6 o’clock hold because it hits about 4 to 8 inches high at 12 to 15 yards distance but it centers well
It is possible for this replica to purchase the dedicated muzzle-loading cylinder which is slightly different from the classic 1858 cylinders because it is slightly larger. the loading lever serves precisely this purpose, not only to hold.Another thing: This revolver Is really strong,Is forged and can shoot +p cartridges without any problem. Here ,in Italy,Is proof tested at 1350 bar( 19580 psi)!It Is capable of over 1000 joules of Power without over pressure damages...
That’s the reason why I prefer using a drop in Howell conversion cylinder or a conversion repro revolver like this one instead of a colt SAA is the cylinder removal is simpler
Have one in 38spl. Very good quality. I was impressed. That thin front sight makes it very accurate to shoot and the point of aim is dead on.
Thanks for watching. I hope to produce a video on the 1875 and 1890 Remington revolvers in the near future. They are both of excellent quality and are excellent shooters.
I love the commentary ❤ and the guns. One day i will own 1 of each(repros) so far i got 2 1851,a 1858 and a 1847 walker
Thanks for watching and commenting. Don't forget the "Dragoons." They were also part of the evolutionary chain of Colt revolvers. My collection is near complete, with only a Colt Paterson being the missing piece.I probably won't see that one in my lifetime.
Nice Big Iron! Nice fiddle of Leaning on the Everlasting Arms
Thanks for watching. I thought that the song fit the time period. I think that the song was also used in a Civil War documentary, but I can't remember which one.
I love my drop in Howell fluted .45 colt cartridge conversion cylinder in my Uberti 1858 new model army revolver. I shoot HSM .45 colt 200 grain cowboy loads from it and I made a video of myself firing my first shots from it and posted it on my channel
Thanks for watching. These reproductions are just a hoot to shoot. I have the 1858 BP revolver in .44, this one, the 1878 in .45 Colt, and the 1890 in .45 Colt. I'll post reviews of the 1858 BP revolver and 1890 at some time in the future.
@@RangeRoninChronicles I would love to see possibly some shooting videos of your other models 1878, 1890. Thanks for a good video.
Hello Range Ronin! Do you know if it's safe to use fmj rounds with these factory conversations? Thanks for a truly phenomenal video friend. It's relaxing, informative, and thorough.
Thanks for stopping by and commenting. I appreciate both. Now, to your question, "Is it safe to use FMJ rounds...?"
I'll answer that by passing on information provided by Uberti:
1. NEVER use cartridges marked “High Speed” or “High Velocity”.
2. Uberti assumes no liability for incidents occurring through the use of reloaded ammunition.
3. Use ONLY COMMERCIALLY loaded cartridges that have been loaded in accordance with SAAMI-C.I.P. standards.
The most commonly-used ammunition for these firearms are "Cowboy" loads, low-velocity rounds with a lead round-nose or lead semi-wadcutter bullet running around 725 to 850 fps. They may be more expensive, but I like to protect the investment that I am holding in my hand.
With that said, there should be no reason why you cannot fire full metal jacketed rounds, as long as they fall within the limitations set by Uberti. Something like Fiocchi Range Dynamics .45LC 225 Grain CMJ running around 750 fps would be a good range round. Also, Ammo, Inc. Signature .45 Colt 250 grain Total Metal Jacket Brass Cased Centerfire Pistol Ammunition 45C250TMC-A50 running around 842 fps might work well.
I would not put something like Underwood Ammo .45 Colt 250 Grain Full Metal Jacket Nickel Plated Brass Cased running around 960 fps through one though. This is a hunting load that is best put through something like a Ruger Blackhawk, (early) Vaquero, or even a Ruger Redhawk chambered in .45 Colt.
If you have a Uberti that fires .38 Special (Colt Navy conversion model), I would follow the same guideline - keep the velocity low for plinking, regardless of the bullet used.
I have shot some hand-loaded FMJ through my Uberti revolvers, but they were loaded light and worked with no issues.
I hope that my answer helped.
I had John Gren convert a Remy NMA revolver for me waaaaaaay back in 1993. It is in 44 Russian and I still have it.
I have been collecting and shooting Uberti revolvers for decades because of their high quality and accuracy. The reason Uberti had to add a firing pin block to .45 LC conversion revolvers was due to ridiculous safety requirements by anti-gun States like the Soviet Socialist State of Maryland, where I reside. It certainly ruined the authenticity of the revolvers, but I was able to buy them. Other requirements by the Governor of Maryland forced the Stoeger Firearms facility to flee from Accomack, MD to another State in order to stay in business. The idiot Governor was so proud of himself, he ran for President and only got 1% of the vote. A true Narcissist to the end. He never entered politics again. Damn him to hell.
Thanks for taking the time to watch an comment. While I agree that the safety takes away from the authenticity, at least Uberti did it tastefully and you would never know that its there unless you know the revolvers. I also agree that there should be term limits for any elected official or any official that is too incompetent to do the job. Don't get me started!😁
Good video! I have Beal’s 1861 reproduction from Euroarms, made in 1972. No conversion for this one, just balls and powder, but it’s a good shooter.
Thanks for watching. I have the Uberti Remington 1858 New Army in cap n' ball. I have not shot it yet, but will be doing a "first shots fired" video review of it at some point.
I gotta get me one of these.
Thanks for watching. You would probably like the 1875 as well. These are great firearms.
You bet! Take care as well my friend.
Thank you for the video. I have been debating on whether to convert my 1858, or purchase one already made.
Thanks you for watching and commenting. I went thought the same quandary as you, as I also have the BP version. Not knowing whether a conversion cylinder would match, plus conversion cylinders are not cheap, I decided to invest in this one, in which I knew 99.346% that all parts would match up and be fitted properly.
Uberti wouldn't have put that ridiculous safety on the hammer if our gov. Didn't require it for import. At least it's pretty well hidden!
Agreed. Uberti was very discreet when they incorporated this type of safety, and they retained the "flavor" of the revolver. Thanks for watching.
I have both and frankly like the ability to load and carry six rounds safely with the new model.
@@kentwilliams3326 yes, I have several,and I've found the firing pin sits nicely between the case heads. At least on the 45 colt/ Schofield cartridges. I'm not saying that's ultra safe, but I've not had any issues with them carried that way. I've thought about machining a hole between the cylinders, to more securely hold the firing pin in that position.
I've noticed some of the conversion cylinders come that way
Actually, the original Remington conversion chambered in .46 rimfire did not have a loading gate. They just had a cut out in the recoil shield to allow the cartridges to be loaded from the rear.
That is true. I knew about it but forgot to mention it.
Just ordered one of these to take out in the woods. Surprisingly hard to find new online.
Thanks for watching and commenting. Yes, they are hard to find, but worth the search. I have this one, the 1875, and the 1890. All shoot great!
I have this revolver with the safety feature. As received the screw slot is in the horizonal position. Will turning it to vertical change the safety feature? I've owned many S.A. revolvers and understand the empty chamber. I noticed in your video your slot was vertical and you said you would never change it.
Thanks for watching and for your question. With the hammer screw in the horizontal position, the revolver will not fire, as a block prevents the hammer from going all the way forward to strike the internal firing pin. When the hammer screw is in the vertical position, the hammer is allowed to strike the internal firing pin. I have just developed the habit of load one, skip one, load four, close the door (loading gate). I do so when even firing modern single-action revolver like the Ruger, just to stay in the habit.
Your hammer should have an "S" stamped into it where the safety screw is located. Turn the screw slightly counterclockwise, or until it is in the vertical position, and the safety block is off. Turn the screw clockwise to the "S" position, and you will see the safety block move forward, thus preventing the hammer from moving all the way forward..
I enjoy it. It's a big iron. I have the pietta sheriff conversion as well. They are heavy. Good on the recoil. Robust revolver. I think it's a pretty iron. Prettier than the Colt
Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment. This one is my favorite of the Remington revolvers that I have. Like you, I favor the Remington over the Colt.
What a shame that ealier model has mid positions on cylinder to put hammer in front position safe, but in newer model we have to put one chamber empty.
Thanks for watching and commenting. I know that the Colts had the safe position, but I am not sure if the Remington did. I'll have to research that. Just remember that when the 1873 Colt was born, it was without safety stops, and there was no firing pin block, cylinder pin block, or transfer bar safety like there is today. Different times, different minds.
Don't forget to try a S&W Schofield as well.
There will be a review on the Uberti S&W Model 3 at some point, as well as on other Uberti reproductions. I have a heck of a backlog to get through Thanks for watching.
A question. Can you purchase spare cylinders for these and swap them like the blackpowder versions?
Yes you can. Check out Midway USA. They have a complete line of cylinders for both BP and cartridge revolvers.
Great question! Thanks for asking. I was wondering the same!
I never worry about leaving the hammer on an "empty chamber.' Instead, I load the cylinder with all chambers loaded and leave the hammer located in-between chambers with the firing pin holding the cylinder in place between cartridge rims.
Thanks for watching and commenting. The older Colts had a hole in-between the chambers so that this could be done. This is just a habit I exercise.
Yes, I know about the hole in-between the chambers in the colts. Thank you for the reply.
@@robertmckinley2030 I figured that you did. Only folks that know these pistols do. Have a great day!
I have a new model army made by navy arms company in 1969 but it has a U stamped on so it was made by uberti. I’m wondering if it would be worth getting a conversion cylinder for it but I’m not sure as it is pretty old but in great shape.
Thanks for watching and or your question. Here is my take on things. Many original 1858 percussion revolvers underwent conversions through Remington Arms and private gunsmiths. When the 1875 Remington was produced, a solely cartridge revolver, the 1858 models were still being converted. That is a testament to the strength of these old pieces.
After I purchased this 1858 and also an 1872 Colt Open top, I became more interested in the percussion revolvers and have amassed a pretty good collection of Uberti reproductions of those revolvers in several versions and calibers.
If it were the other way around, as you have, I would leave the 1858 percussion revolver as is and enjoy it for what it is - a percussion revolver, and just purchase a Uberti 1858 conversion that I know is fitted properly and properly timed and tuned. But that's just me.
Do you recommend a fluted or un-fluted cylinder, or does it make any difference ...thanks !
Either will work. The un-fluted cylinder may have more strength, and obviously will weigh a tad more than the fluted cylinder, but not enough to make a difference, I do believe. Personally, I like the un-fluted cylinder, as it blends more into the lines and look of the revolver, which has an impressive look about it to begin with.
@@RangeRoninChronicles Thanks a lot ! I've had black powder revolvers a long time, but only recently did I think about converting them, so I didn't know much about it ! Thanks again, and thanks for not calling me dumb...ha !
Does this require cowboy ammunition or can it use modern?
Thanks for watching and for your question. While it seems robust enough for modern ammunition, I prefer to run "Cowboy" loads to save wear and tear on the revolver and for shooting pleasure. I have a Ruger Blackhawk in .45 LC that will handle the heavy stuff for more serious shooting. I can only answer your question by saying that ammunition recommendations are not mentioned in the owner's instructions. With that said, Uberti does recommend "Cowboy" loads be run in their 1873 Colt reproductions and earlier reproduction conversion revolvers like the 1860 Army. Hope this helps.
Enjoyed the video although the VERY LOUD fiddle music was quite annoying.
Thanks for watching and commenting. This was one of my earlier attempts at videos reviews and I had not got the hang of balancing back ground music. I may remix this one at some point.
Are you sure 46 rimfire model was 5 shot ? I guess thats one detail Clint got wrong in Pale Rider .... his was a six shooter
Thanks for watching. Ayup, I am pretty sure about that. Clint's gun was also a prop gun set up to make it easy to exchange cylinders.
Yup, I noticed Clint's prop gun has whats meant to be rimfire dummy ammo in one of the close-ups ... no primers. I guess he needed to put 6 quick holes in the bad guy to match the script. Thanks for your video.@@RangeRoninChronicles
@@macguru9999 Thanks for the conversation. Pale Rider was one of my favorite Eastwood movies, and was the movie that got me interested in the Remington revolvers. I have the 1858 in percussion, this one, and the 1875 Remington conversion "New Army" and the 1890. I plan a review of them, but have not passed the planning stage.
Some bad acting in The Outlaw Josey Wales, but it was an entertaining movie anyway. The movie "Unforgiven" was my reason to buy a Schofield reproduction. I'll have a review on it at some point.
Agreed Pale rider and Unforgiven are my favourites too. I mainly shoot LR target but I have a nice 1873 winchester miroku. cheers@@RangeRoninChronicles
I wish someone could show Me ONE cartridge case that is head stamped .45 (long) Colt.
Thanks for watching. So do I. I believe the term "Long Colt" was used to differentiate between the .45 Schofield, which was essentially the .45 "Short" Colt. The Smith and Wesson Schofield would chamber the "Short" Colt but would not chamber the "Long" Colt, but the Colt Single Action Army would chamber both. Thus, when buying ammunition, early users of the Schofield and Colt SAA would have to tell the clerk which Colt ammunition they needed, short or long. So, as of today, the .45 Schofield is the .45 Short Colt, and the .454 Casull is the .45 Longer Colt. Then there is the .45 Colt "Rimless" that has become known as the .45 ACP...
does that come in a stainless?
Thanks for taking the time to watch the review. To answer your question, the 1858 is not available in stainless-steel, but the 1875 is available in a nickel-plated version (www.uberti-usa.com/cartridge-revolvers/top-breaks-outlaw-frontier).
I honestly lose some respect for fellow gun lovers when they "skip one" when loading revolvers whilst they have the intention of emptying the gun down range. Loading 5 is a safety rule for carrying the gun around. If you're going to empty the gun down range it is pointless to only load 5.
Thanks for watching and commenting. Ya know, everyone has their own thing. I actually can exercise the option to load anywhere from one to six rounds, or maybe even seven rounds in some DA revolvers. I might even "stagger load" a cylinder with a couple of snap caps for flinch checking. In a semi-auto, I just might insert a snap cap somewhere in the stack for a failure drill. To lose respect for someone because they load five instead of six is a pretty harsh statement to make.
were can i find the cylinder
Thanks for watching and for your questions. Try Midway (www.midwayusa.com/). They carry quite a few conversion cylinders for Uberti products.
thx@@RangeRoninChronicles
Omg I used to live in the Gwinnett Norcross Duluth area
Thanks for watching! That area keeps evolving; it has changed a lot in the years that I have lived and worked in the Duluth area.
@@RangeRoninChronicles especially at the Norcross post office. On that side of the road on up they got condos up now. But I moved a few years back....
@@RangeRoninChronicles and you're welcome
I like your video, but you can kill the music. It's a distraction.
Angel Eyes's gun.
Thanks for watching and commenting, and...you are exactly correct!
It holds Six; load six and run it in a correct holster with a correct hammer strap... lost knowledge. Sad. For those of you that do not know what I am referencing -- y'all just keep your sidearm at 17% less workable than mine.
Thanks for your comment. I'll only respond by including this: "Some modern single actions have been designed to be safely carried with the hammer down over a loaded chamber-notably the post-1973 Rugers-but in cowboy action shooting the hammer must be on an empty chamber regardless of whether the particular revolver is safe to carry with a full boat. This technique-load one, skip one, load the remaining chambers and come to full cock, then lower the hammer on an empty chamber-will work for any single-action revolver, regardless if it is a five-, six- or eight- or nine-shot cylinder.
If you have any doubt as to whether a particular single-action revolver is safe to carry with all chambers loaded, here is a simple examination. Ensuring that the gun is empty, hold the gun up with the muzzle pointed in a safe direction and carefully look at the gap between the breech-face of the revolver frame and the cylinder. If you see the firing pin protruding from the breech-face, either on its own or when you apply thumb pressure on the hammer without holding down the trigger, carry it with an empty chamber under the hammer."
- How To Load A Single-Action Revolver by Dave Campbell posted on April 22, 2011 (NRA/American Rifleman)
Nice video with good commentary, just need to ditch the music.
Thanks for your comment - and watching. Sorry for the delay responding. Sometime, I don't get notified of comments. As for the music, I won't get rid of music in my videos, but I am learning how to temper it a bit and lower the volume.
the first gun "the gun you called a beals navy is not a beals , .,
Thanks for watching. You are correct, the first revolver shown is not a Remington Beals. I did not have a good picture of one when I created this review and had to substitute. I have since found a picture of a Remington Beals Navy Revolver @ www.nramuseum.org/guns/the-galleries/a-nation-asunder-1861-to-1865/case-16-union-pistols-and-revolvers/remington-beals-navy-model-revolver.aspx.
Good show. Too much background music.
I appreciate that. I am still trying to find the right levels out for both voice-over and background music. Sometimes I use BGM and other times I don't. Convention says no background music during voice-overs. Sometimes, I just can't help myself😁
@@RangeRoninChronicles
You have a fairly deep base to midrange voice. Pick a background piece that plays mostly in high registers then run it through a fairly sharp high pass filter. Set the low end to near the high end of your voice. The roll off should be at least 3db per octave, 6db might be better.
Here's the general idea. If you know a musition, perhaps a piano player have them record a favorite, "Streets of Larado" perhaps. Up it an octive or two or three. Have them play it pianissimo. Run it thru a high pass to get rid of any sympathetic strings and background in your voice register. Then mix in your voice over. If you have sterio put it on one side only, probably B. That way listeners can adjust to suit; cell phones excepted, naturally.
Hope the general idea helps.
is no long colt
Thanks for watching. Back in the day, and if you were buying .45 ammunition, a shopkeeper might ask if you wanted long or short Colt. The .45 Schofield, also referred to as .45 Smith & Wesson was a revolver cartridge developed by Smith & Wesson for their S&W Model 3 Schofield top-break revolver. It is similar to the .45 Colt cartridge, but with a shorter case and a larger rim. This, the question, "Do you want long or short Colt?"
if any one would like to be educated on these fire arms i suggest you watch cap and ball channel, or forgotten weapons . not these
I suggest that folks watch those as well, as I always take away something from them. This is only my opinion on and experience with a firearm that I own and shoot. Some may learn something based on my opinion and experience with any of the firearms that I review, while some may not. In fact, check out Brandon Herrera's review of the 1858 Remington @ th-cam.com/video/yC1Zc4zAOwc/w-d-xo.html.
Oh that's okay I must have been having a bad day or something. You keep playing your music and forgive me. As we are heading into terrible times for this country and the world, you take care of yourself and your family. Make sure you have plenty of supplies for your arms and stock up on nonparishable foods, water, and medical stuff. I am not getting a good feeling about things in this world. Take care Don
I think that we are in full agreement about heading into terrible times. When things will finally boil over is anyone's guess. I was told once that anything (and I believe that they meant the government) built by the people, and for the people, will fail the people. The comic strip character named Pogo said it best, "We have met the enemy and he is us".
For myself, I try to abide by the "BIG 10" and stay away from the "Big 7". We could probably spend hours, if not days, discussing the issues that are assailing us on a daily basis. I am just fortunate enough, for today anyway, to have woken up on the right side of the grass and still remain optimistic that I can catch most of the curves that are thrown my way - in theory, anyway.
Stay safe, my brother!
Don’t waste your time buying a cap and ball revolver because you can’t get caps for they.
Thanks for watching and commenting. That's not necessarily true. Caps can be found, but it may take some searching on-line. When you do find them, purchase as many as you can.
Have been able to find a few cci#11 ,caps....the manufacturer of my revolvers recommends #10 caps...Remington #10 fits best but have not seen any remington caps in a couple years...I have changed nipples on my revolver to slix shot nipples...the #11 caps stay on these nipples good where they fit very loose on the factory nipples...I consider this a needed improvement on my colts because it helps prevent cap jams
Thanks for the info .@@michaellankford8358
@@michaellankford8358Look into a Cap maker. You can even mix up priming compound yourself. I've been doing it since 2012.
I know it’s not the standard but you can use the toy cap gun primers for a cap n ball
Pietta is better.
Uberti is okay, I guess...
I think both are great but give the edge to Uberti. The reason being is where they put their marks. Uberti having it under the loading rod is a nice touch.
@@aeis3007
Actually, I would be happy with either. Mine are Piettas, and I'm happy with them.
If you think uberti made a mistake putting the hammer block screw on the pistol. You are a fool , i've seen many people put the hammer down on a loaded cylinder. Not everyone knows to skip a cylinder and put the hammer down on an empty cylinder.
Gee! Thanks for watching and the comment. I am far from being a fool. Having the screw safety on the hammer to prevent the firing pin from striking the primer was the best place to put it, given the revolver's design. In some Uberti 1873 Colt SAA reproductions, the cylinder pin has two grooves, The first groove allows the hammer to fall fully forward, while the second groove that is engaged when pushing the cylinder pin all the way in, prevents the hammer from falling fully forward. Your statement, " i've seen many people put the hammer down on a loaded cylinder. Not everyone knows to skip a cylinder and put the hammer down on an empty cylinder." is correct and stood on it's own merit without the insult. What is foolish, is not understanding the firearm one is handling, and that lack of understanding can get somebody hurt.
While I enjoy receiving comments, I don't enjoy being insulted. I do not insult others and I expect the same from them.
It simply isn't possible to cure all the different dangerous things people do. Like everything in life, it is important to be informed, to research and to listen to the advice of those with experience. There's no cure to prevent people from doing all dangerous things. I believe your criticism too a bit too harsh even if your heart was in the right place. Many of us are looking for the most authenticly reproduced items, and, needless to say this was before the many established safety standards of today. People who aren't prepared to do their research and take safety seriously probably ought not be handling these types of guns, maybe not even the modern kinds and perhaps it's better if they handle none at all.
@@MubElbmur-ok7kz You are correct in theory, but I've seen many fools at the range. That have no idea what they're doing and in my opinion should not even own a firearm. For people who display no common sense That's what my comment was geared to.
You'll get no argument from me about some people not having sense and ought not be owning a gun. These people, no matter the precautions and safeties WILL find a way to hurt themselves and possibly others, there's no stopping them, that's what I'm saying. While I'd love for them not to own a gun, they probably ought not be driving either because they're probably a safety hazard on the roads too ... but, we've got no power over this.
It's always the rookies who be talking crap in the comments. Please go put your dad's gun away boy before you shoot your pebbles off. 😅🤣😂
You said uberti thinks we're not smarter than our forefathers and decided to install this ridiculous safety measure. That to me is a foolish statement. Today many people watch hollywood movies and take their safety tips from what they see on t v. I don't think a safety on a firearm is a bad idea for some, personally I do not use them. My comment was not meant to insult you just an eye opening statement.
Personally, I don't use the safety on these reproductions either. Even in my modern single-action revolvers, I leave the hammer resting on an unloaded chamber even though there may be a hammer block safety; It's just a habit that I choose to exercise between modern and reproduction SA revolvers. In truth, I was not comfortable making the statement, but I made it anyway fully anticipating a comment. A return comment just took longer than I expected.
There is an important note in the Owner's manual; "The old-timers used to say that the safest way to carry a single-action revolver was to load only five chambers and let the hammer rest, in the safety position, on the empty sixth chamber." Resting the hammer on an empty chamber is reiterated several times. Regardless of the safety means installed, it is still up to the operator to understand and follow good safety practices with whatever firearm they are handling.
I don't retract my statement. It was made in good faith with a twist of irony to it. It does lead to a somewhat good conversation, don't you think?
@@RangeRoninChronicles yes it does
i overlooked your chanel i now sorry i done that, you can credit the dulist for that he drew my attention to this modle.
Well, thanks for stopping by and commenting. I give Duelist1954 a lot of credit, as he knows his stuff when it comes to BP and conversion firearms. I hope that you stick around, as I will have some more Uberti revolver reviews coming out in the future.
Seems like you could have had a target farther than three feet away.?
What? The target was set at a 10 yard distance. And yes, I have shot at targets up to 35 yards at an outdoor range. The near target was a "zoom" shot inset for my viewers to better see the hits.
Oh. Okay.@@RangeRoninChronicles