ICH Q9 Guidance for Quality Risk Management | With simplified example

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 34

  • @drvica7633
    @drvica7633 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank You so much, greeting from México, it was a very useful example for a Work Medicine class, Im a First Year resident of this speciality, and that example works a lot, than you!

  • @PrakashParmar-kd6lg
    @PrakashParmar-kd6lg ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This single presentation is enough for QRM. Good

    • @proftalks1680
      @proftalks1680  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much for kind words

  • @rajtigris
    @rajtigris ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well presented! Thanks ProfTalks

  • @prady654
    @prady654 ปีที่แล้ว

    i should really appreciate the way it was explained, big thanks.

  • @sowndaryam2491
    @sowndaryam2491 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best presentation for QRM... Pls explain QRM tools sir... Thank you

  • @sonykannidi7699
    @sonykannidi7699 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice presentation...very informative...i need root cause analysis with examples...

    • @proftalks1680
      @proftalks1680  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks. Will work on suggested topic..

  • @SateeshKumarSingh-we9jv
    @SateeshKumarSingh-we9jv 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great easy way to understand ich q9

  • @mohitjhansi
    @mohitjhansi 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lage raho bhai outstanding effort

  • @anirudhnandan85
    @anirudhnandan85 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good explanation.. great effort

  • @VijayKumar-hu7ou
    @VijayKumar-hu7ou ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir ,diring traing you mention we can take pharmaceutical issue as an example plese make one more video ,so that we can understand in depth.thank you sir

  • @munasofi5037
    @munasofi5037 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very nice presentation. would you please let me know what kind of risk management measures a company would need if it outsources all of it's manufacturing activities?

    • @proftalks1680
      @proftalks1680  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks.. Please share your email id.. I will write some description of the requirements.

  • @tilahunalemayehu1498
    @tilahunalemayehu1498 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The presentation is very helpful and practical, thanks. But i dont get the video u mentioned about FMEA. Is there any video?

    • @proftalks1680
      @proftalks1680  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for appreciation. I have actually not yet loaded the separate FMEA presentation, but surely will do so at the earliest.

  • @VijayKumar-hu7ou
    @VijayKumar-hu7ou ปีที่แล้ว

    Good information sir

  • @achyutjagdhane9683
    @achyutjagdhane9683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks a lot sir , very nice

  • @deepakjaiswal3988
    @deepakjaiswal3988 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice informative video,Please speak loudly sir during next.thanks

    • @proftalks1680
      @proftalks1680  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Deepak... Noted and will implement...

  • @bhavanigandi3859
    @bhavanigandi3859 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please do vedio in QRM tools

  • @madhan5577
    @madhan5577 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Phama example is there means good to understand

    • @proftalks1680
      @proftalks1680  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for the suggestion. Will take care of the same

  • @kannanmuthusamy4787
    @kannanmuthusamy4787 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Plz share ppt too hence text not clear/ hazy

    • @proftalks1680
      @proftalks1680  ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure, meanwhile the problem can be due to weak internet connection. Please check the same as well

  • @Shyam0024
    @Shyam0024 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Risk assessment of new equipment in pharma company

    • @proftalks1680
      @proftalks1680  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi, please clarify your comment. This will help me make improvement

  • @teeders48
    @teeders48 ปีที่แล้ว

    One thing that is missing from this is how to determine the appropriate thresholds for low/medium/high risks. Why is 41 selected as high, etc.? Why is this acceptable? Additionally, the descriptions of qualitative or quantitative are incorrect. You provided two types of qualitative categorization. Just because a number is used does not make is quantitative. ICH Q9 explains a quantitive estimate uses a numerical probability. A scale from 1 to 5 is not quantitative, what are the probability threshold for each category?

    • @proftalks1680
      @proftalks1680  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank for the review comment. Will check the details against Q9 once more

  • @mansisinha1
    @mansisinha1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It should be ISO 31000 : 2018