10:46 after explanation i was thinking what do we mean by justified by law and guess what in next 2 second u just picked that point up i was really surprised. Well explained and u went to depth of the concept Kudos to u
Awsmeeee Sir if possible thn please make more videos on IPC because ur way of explaining each nd every topic really it's too unique . It's humble request Sir please make more videos on IPC.
If the act is itself unlawful he cannot take recourse of mistake of fact . In R vs Prince a person was prosecuted for abducting girl below the age of 16 years under the belief that she was 18 , As the act ie (abduction) itself is an offence under 361 . He wasn't allowed to take plea of mistake of fact and accordingly prosecuted.
I have searched a lot of vedios and finally I have got my solution here!
very very good. Keep it up sirji
Thank u so much sir , abh jake mera clear hua mera section 76 nd 79
Bhai, the way you speak is very friendly.
Thank you.
Wish you all the best.
10:46 after explanation i was thinking what do we mean by justified by law and guess what in next 2 second u just picked that point up i was really surprised. Well explained and u went to depth of the concept
Kudos to u
it was a great help ,... very good analysis by you sir
Thanks for making these videos for us
U cleared my doubt
Sir subh ke 5:44 hore hai yanha b💯thanks alot for the explanation 👍🏻
Concept cleared thankyou🙏
so well explained ....thank you for taking pains for us. keep making videos and helping us :)
Super and ultimately delivered the knowledge. Thank sir
Awesome explaination sir, love u
The best video i have watched till now
Keep it up bro
Your videos are very helpful!
Wow ..great sir.. what a simplified explaination❤️
After 10 minutes i found my doubt solution ❤❤🙋🏻♂️
great sir
Fascinating info.
Thanku so much sir u explained it so well.
Awesome
Beautifully explained brother... I'm an ardent follower of your channel..
Awsmeeee Sir if possible thn please make more videos on IPC because ur way of explaining each nd every topic really it's too unique . It's humble request Sir please make more videos on IPC.
Glad that you like the content. Thanks I would .
What an explanation 👏
well explained
Thanks man ..helped alot
Thank you soo much!
It was incredibly amazing.
Thanku so much😊😊😊😊😊
Thanks
💯💯
Thank u sir..
THANKOUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Sir
Your sound is not clear
But if the act is unlawful in its very nature, in this case can we claim the defence of mistake of fact?
If the act is itself unlawful he cannot take recourse of mistake of fact . In R vs Prince a person was prosecuted for abducting girl below the age of 16 years under the belief that she was 18 ,
As the act ie (abduction) itself is an offence under 361 . He wasn't allowed to take plea of mistake of fact and accordingly prosecuted.
Sir mistake fact 76 and 79 and mistake of law kaha hai
Duniya me Share ka jin hata diye! Pagal ny rahetha!
Excellent