Finally got mine today in Singapore 🇸🇬! Love it so much, I have the TTArtisa 0.95, the Noctilux 0.95, they all different, the voigtlander has its own character! I will have a lot of fun with this lens 👍🏻
The big question, especially for those of us who already own one , is how it compares to the Noctilux F0.95. Comparing Voigtlander’s modern aspherical lens with an antique spherical design from the 1970s (almost 50 years ago) does not tell us what we need to know: would you sell your Noctilux F 0.95 and buy this lens instead?
Good question. Didn’t have a .95 to compare it to for the review but from what I’ve seen I think both are prob more comparable to each other vs the Noct f1 where the Voigtlander is sharper. Would I sell a 50 Noct for this? That depends entirely on how one takes to third party lenses. First, the .95 is a lens that’s been out for a number of years and never updated, so it makes sense lens manufacturers can replicate or best the performance with today’s manufacturing techniques. Also Some users want Leica only glass and that’s it, others are more open to exploring and aren’t so brand conscious. Difficult to say one way or the other
As David says below : I think 'grounded asphere' is a mis-translation by Voigtlander. My understanding is that they make some asphere elements by precision moulding of glass, while others are made by CNC diamond grinding followed by CNC polishing, which can ultimately be more accurate, but also more expensive. Also the moulding process has some limits to the range of glass types that can be used. I was looking at their current catalogue in the last few days - it's very impressive ( I am a lens designer myself, been doing it for 33 years ! )
Thanks Mark for this. Makes sense and based on your knowledge and expertise, this will be how I explain it in the future. Thanks for watching and commenting
I'm glad they made this lens, but I'm the person in your final thoughts who prefers to shoot stopped down and will be sticking with my 50 APO for now. Thanks for the review!
Quite a few of the M mount Voigtlanders have had black finishing on the bayonet besides the 50mm F1 like 90 F2.8 and Heliar 50 F1.5. Hopefully it becomes a habit for Voigtlander.
A ground aspherical element s more accurate than a cheaper moulded one. Smooth internal glass structure and a more accurate external shape. So Voigtlander-Cosina is correct in that. Leica Noctilux has the same thing.
Did you leave the other channel? Anways, happy to support you here too. Lovely reviews, keep them coming! I have no doubts that you'll get this channel growing quick! All the best from Scotland!
Hi Kevin thanks for watching. Left Tech360 but still with Geek Culture. Wanted to kick off my own channel on gear that I’m also interested in that doesn’t necessarily fit with Geek Cultures audience. Yeah looking forward to growing the channel here but will take some time
I'm one of the photographers that dislike the bokeh in the image corners. Therefore I think the Nokton 50mm f1.2 has the better image quality and is an overall better lens than the Nokton f1. Unfortunately it does not seem to be available for Nikon Z mount (yet?) - especially because it's also a lot more affordable than the 50mm f1.
Understand your viewpoint and perhaps when they or if they come out with a version 2 of the 50mm f1.2 we may see something for the Z mount. Let’s see what happens
Nice review, i was looking for a lens like this for my Sony Alpha 7rV , but the 50 f2 Apo Lanthar is good too, which one gives you a better Leica look ? I mean the colors ..
APO lenses tend to give a more modern rendering. They are fantastic lenses but at the point of their almost perfect look, you would be better to go with a Sony 50 1.2 GM or 1.4GM. The leica look is that 3D pop with beautiful bokeh and fall off. That comes a lot from the older Mandler design lenses. The 50 f1 to me gives you a good combination of modern yet unique rendering especially wide open
@@btonelli Thanks for the answer, it's true but the 50 f1 is just impossible to find, I live in Switzerland and there are nowhere to try them. I just bought a Sony Alpha 7 RV with a 24-70 2.8 GM II. It's great but a little heavy, I would like a lens for everyday use, but since I had Leica before I try to twick the colors of the camera a little to try to obtain the "colors Leica" but it's hard :-). That's why I thought that the optics from Voigtlander, especially the Apo Lanthar, the 35 or the 50 could help... But the 50 1.2 Sony GM or the 1.4 is still expensive...
Thank you for the kind words. I used to do radio here in Singapore for a number of years but unfortunately our market is small and the remuneration of radio personalities isn’t what it is in other countries
That was very informative Bobby! My eyes have been on this new lens for quite a while now. From your separate videos I would say the F1 wide open is a little more corrected optically than your own F1.2? I seriously consider this as a low light king for my analog M’s, but guess I need to calibrate the rangefinder pretty darn accurate beforehand lol.
Thanks for watching. Yes more corrected than the 1.2 I feel and yes may need some calibration with the rangefinder. Just depends really but this happens with M Mount lenses at times
Do you have any experience with the Fujifilm 50mm f1? How does this compare to that? I know the sensor size is different, but it would still be fun to see a comparison.
Hi Eirik, Yes I do have experience with that lens. The Voigtländer is slightly different. The Bokeh and look of the fujifilm is more like 75mm 1.4 and it’s more corrected wide open. Less green and purple fringing. The Voigtländer bokeh is more intense but also more CA wide open.
I probably go for the apo 50mm, this lens does have that nice voigtlander character, nice, rich and well saturated color. I may use the price difference between the two 50s for the 35mm f1.2 iii.
Can't wait for the RF mount version. They already confirmed that in addition to focus peaking the actual focus guide will work. That's a pretty big upside on a manual focus lens.
This looks like just my sort of lens having good bokeh. I enjoy manual focus because it slows me down and I feel much more involved in the shooting process. It also increases my satisfaction with the final outcome. I have a Nikon Z7 and have just ordered a used Nikon Z 50mm f1.8 autofocus lens because experts show is crackingly sharp right to the edges and has great bokeh too. It has a large manual focus ring so I intend to use it only in manual focus. If by chance it doesn’t live up to my expectations a Voightlander 50 f1.2 will be on my shopping list as the bokeh of both lenses stopped are strikingly similar but the f1.2 is half the price 40% less weight and its depth of field stopped down not so paper thin. Thanks for the video.
How does it perform when focusing on long distances at maximum aperture? I’m considering between this Voigtlander and Sony 50mm 1.2 GM (I have an autofocus adapter so AF is not a problem).
I actually liked the chrome nose lenses because my cameras and most of my lenses have silver on them. A shame, hope they come up with alternatives like the 58mm or 28mm SL II lenses
@@btonelli This has been very useful for me.I`ve been looking a fast fifty . I`ve used a summicron for 20 years . Bodies are M`s ,CL and an sl2s. Can`t really justify the .95 (I`m just a happy snapper). This seems very much worth a look .Thanks .
Great review with nice samples. Although this lens is M Mount it’s was really design more for adapted use. On mirrorless it’s great on M camera it’s a pain in terms of viewing and focusing.
Just too bad about most review videos now that 95% of the video is looking at the guy making the videos rather than looking at the actual lens itself. In the “build quality” portion of example; the section is about 2 minutes and we see the lens a total of about 10 seconds or so from a far. The rest is looking at you talking into a microphone. It’s the same with all the videos. Most of it is you and not the thing you’re talking about. You can save time getting pretty for the videos and just show us the gear. Anyway. The king of 50s for me is a 50f2. It is small. It is light. It has enough separation. They are excellent at f8 and even f11, and now with digital you can literally shoot in any light. A lens that is huge and heavy will just stay in the closet. I have a better chance taking a good photo with a light and small 50mm that can stay on my camera rather than in my closet. For some reason people are obsessed with f1 and f0.95 lenses. But the fact is they are very niche special use lenses. The best most practical lens is the f2. If you really need more light, the tiny f1.5 Nokton is more than most people will ever need.
Thanks for watching and the reply. To the point of it’s mainly me on camera, well my videos are based on my opinion and experience. Some will just show product shot after product shot but after a while that also gets boring. Everyone has their preference in video and that’s the great thing about TH-cam. In regards to the 50 f2 I agree with you and also prefer this size and aperture. F1 for me is nice but I won’t use it that much.
Why do people keep talking about bokeh in modern, well-corrected lenses? There's almost no bokeh there. There's blur. The last ultra-bright 50 for Leicas that had actual bokeh was the Noctilux 50/1.0, then they went and ruined it completely for the sake of having the record-breaking f/0.95. It's sharper, better corrected, but lost the last bit of bokeh it had and only has clinical blur with no character. Waiting for Voigtlander to make a "Classic" version of this with 6 elements and a traditional double-gauss design with some actual character.
Interesting theory. When I was testing this lens I found the bokeh to be similar to the f1 but a bit more corrected. Less green rings around the light sources etc etc.
Hmm this is an unfair comparison of the Noctilux 0.95. I shoot it primarily on the SL2-S or the M10R and I get much better sharpness than the samples you show. I personally found that M lenses perform better on Leica bodies than my Sony FF bodies. You should redo this video and comparison on a M or SL bodies
I have no skin in this game, I’m just relating what I’ve been told about allocation. It’s not about making everyone run out and buy anything, and as I clearly stated at the end of the video, this lens isn’t for everyone and gave reasons why one should consider or not.
@@btonelli Well, plenty of info on environments conducive to lense fungus out there, and leather is just ideal, but feel free to ignore it. It is your video and your comments section after all.
@@yxx_chris_xxy I live in a hot and humid climate year round so used to mold and fungus. These leather cases are treated and inside are usually foam or another material to protect the lens. Anyways all good, we have our opinions and no one is right or wrong. Just our thoughts.
Thanks!
Wow John thank you so much for this 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Finally got mine today in Singapore 🇸🇬! Love it so much, I have the TTArtisa 0.95, the Noctilux 0.95, they all different, the voigtlander has its own character! I will have a lot of fun with this lens 👍🏻
Congrats!!
Where were you able to get one Max? Riceball?
I just got this Lens in Sony E mount, it is a great Lens to use at aperture 1.0, at aperture 5.6 it is outstanding ! I can highly recommend this Lens!
I took the Nokton RF mount instead.
And due to being very satisfied the little 40 1.2 Nokton joined as the new companion as well.
Awesome. Congrats
The big question, especially for those of us who already own one , is how it compares to the Noctilux F0.95. Comparing Voigtlander’s modern aspherical lens with an antique spherical design from the 1970s (almost 50 years ago) does not tell us what we need to know: would you sell your Noctilux F 0.95 and buy this lens instead?
Good question. Didn’t have a .95 to compare it to for the review but from what I’ve seen I think both are prob more comparable to each other vs the Noct f1 where the Voigtlander is sharper. Would I sell a 50 Noct for this? That depends entirely on how one takes to third party lenses. First, the .95 is a lens that’s been out for a number of years and never updated, so it makes sense lens manufacturers can replicate or best the performance with today’s manufacturing techniques. Also Some users want Leica only glass and that’s it, others are more open to exploring and aren’t so brand conscious. Difficult to say one way or the other
As David says below : I think 'grounded asphere' is a mis-translation by Voigtlander. My understanding is that they make some asphere elements by precision moulding of glass, while others are made by CNC diamond grinding followed by CNC polishing, which can ultimately be more accurate, but also more expensive. Also the moulding process has some limits to the range of glass types that can be used. I was looking at their current catalogue in the last few days - it's very impressive ( I am a lens designer myself, been doing it for 33 years ! )
Thanks Mark for this. Makes sense and based on your knowledge and expertise, this will be how I explain it in the future. Thanks for watching and commenting
On their product page it is called "Grinding Aspherical", so it should be grinded.
Great review! I have the Leica M mount and couldn’t be more happy with it. A $400 buy at an estate sale didn’t hurt.
Wow congrats!
Bobby's flow has flair and attitude to go with knowledge of cameras and lenses. Such a cool dude :)
Thanks 😊
I'm glad they made this lens, but I'm the person in your final thoughts who prefers to shoot stopped down and will be sticking with my 50 APO for now. Thanks for the review!
Completely understand, 50 APO is an awesome lens. Thanks for watching.
I am a fan of M-mount fast 50's, so I hope to test this one out! I miss my visits to Singapore, looks great as ever, cheers Bobby!
Thanks for watching. Yes this lens is one to test for sure
A little bit pricey for me but looking to get the 40mm f1.2 for the Nikon Z mount.
Also a good lens 👍
What are your thoughts on it comparing to Voigtlander Nokton 50 1.2
Optically I feel it’s better.
Bobby I waited 9 months for this lens, finally got it today!!!
Wow!! That’s a long wait!
@@btonelli ya 8 months! I hope it’s worth it
Quite a few of the M mount Voigtlanders have had black finishing on the bayonet besides the 50mm F1 like 90 F2.8 and Heliar 50 F1.5. Hopefully it becomes a habit for Voigtlander.
Yes seems they are changing this. Hope it continues
A ground aspherical element s more accurate than a cheaper moulded one. Smooth internal glass structure and a more accurate external shape. So Voigtlander-Cosina is correct in that. Leica Noctilux has the same thing.
Thanks for the info. Much appreciated
I enjoy your breakdowns and smaples, keep up mate!
Thanks!! Much appreciated
Did you leave the other channel? Anways, happy to support you here too. Lovely reviews, keep them coming! I have no doubts that you'll get this channel growing quick! All the best from Scotland!
Hi Kevin thanks for watching. Left Tech360 but still with Geek Culture. Wanted to kick off my own channel on gear that I’m also interested in that doesn’t necessarily fit with Geek Cultures audience. Yeah looking forward to growing the channel here but will take some time
I'm one of the photographers that dislike the bokeh in the image corners. Therefore I think the Nokton 50mm f1.2 has the better image quality and is an overall better lens than the Nokton f1. Unfortunately it does not seem to be available for Nikon Z mount (yet?) - especially because it's also a lot more affordable than the 50mm f1.
Understand your viewpoint and perhaps when they or if they come out with a version 2 of the 50mm f1.2 we may see something for the Z mount. Let’s see what happens
what lens are you comparing the Voightlander to? you did not mention that in the photo of yourself.
Ah yes that was the Leica Noctilux 50mm f1 version 4 I believe
Nice review, i was looking for a lens like this for my Sony Alpha 7rV , but the 50 f2 Apo Lanthar is good too, which one gives you a better Leica look ? I mean the colors ..
APO lenses tend to give a more modern rendering. They are fantastic lenses but at the point of their almost perfect look, you would be better to go with a Sony 50 1.2 GM or 1.4GM. The leica look is that 3D pop with beautiful bokeh and fall off. That comes a lot from the older Mandler design lenses. The 50 f1 to me gives you a good combination of modern yet unique rendering especially wide open
@@btonelli Thanks for the answer, it's true but the 50 f1 is just impossible to find, I live in Switzerland and there are nowhere to try them. I just bought a Sony Alpha 7 RV with a 24-70 2.8 GM II. It's great but a little heavy, I would like a lens for everyday use, but since I had Leica before I try to twick the colors of the camera a little to try to obtain the "colors Leica" but it's hard :-). That's why I thought that the optics from Voigtlander, especially the Apo Lanthar, the 35 or the 50 could help...
But the 50 1.2 Sony GM or the 1.4 is still expensive...
Very nice video, as always. From your experience, does it have enough character like, for example, the 50mm Noctilux ?
Thanks. Yes it does. It’s very similar to the 50 f1 but sharper
Bobby, what adapter do you use this lens with Canon R5 ? Thanks for your review!
Thanks for watching. It worked really well! Resolves the 45MP sensor nicely and has some character to it
have you ever considered a radio job with your radio voice?
Thank you for the kind words. I used to do radio here in Singapore for a number of years but unfortunately our market is small and the remuneration of radio personalities isn’t what it is in other countries
@@btonelli I knew it, what country are you from?
@@jamesgjurovich7893 I’m American but based in Singapore
Tough call as I’m selling my SL2S for an M11/M10R I just can’t pull the trigger! Question, 50mm RF 1.2 or this what are you shooting on the R5?
Honestly 50 1.2 RF. Autofocus, sharper at f1.2 for the Canon
That was very informative Bobby! My eyes have been on this new lens for quite a while now. From your separate videos I would say the F1 wide open is a little more corrected optically than your own F1.2? I seriously consider this as a low light king for my analog M’s, but guess I need to calibrate the rangefinder pretty darn accurate beforehand lol.
Thanks for watching. Yes more corrected than the 1.2 I feel and yes may need some calibration with the rangefinder. Just depends really but this happens with M Mount lenses at times
Do you have any experience with the Fujifilm 50mm f1? How does this compare to that? I know the sensor size is different, but it would still be fun to see a comparison.
Hi Eirik,
Yes I do have experience with that lens. The Voigtländer is slightly different. The Bokeh and look of the fujifilm is more like 75mm 1.4 and it’s more corrected wide open. Less green and purple fringing. The Voigtländer bokeh is more intense but also more CA wide open.
@@btonelli aha I see! Thanks for the comparison :)
I probably go for the apo 50mm, this lens does have that nice voigtlander character, nice, rich and well saturated color. I may use the price difference between the two 50s for the 35mm f1.2 iii.
@@jliang70 yes the 50 APO does have some nice colors coming from it
Can't wait for the RF mount version. They already confirmed that in addition to focus peaking the actual focus guide will work. That's a pretty big upside on a manual focus lens.
Yes but not sure why it’s not out yet
This looks like just my sort of lens having good bokeh. I enjoy manual focus because it slows me down and I feel much more involved in the shooting process. It also increases my satisfaction with the final outcome. I have a Nikon Z7 and have just ordered a used Nikon Z 50mm f1.8 autofocus lens because experts show is crackingly sharp right to the edges and has great bokeh too. It has a large manual focus ring so I intend to use it only in manual focus. If by chance it doesn’t live up to my expectations a Voightlander 50 f1.2 will be on my shopping list as the bokeh of both lenses stopped are strikingly similar but the f1.2 is half the price 40% less weight and its depth of field stopped down not so paper thin. Thanks for the video.
Thanks for watching! The beauty of all these lenses is discovering them and how they make our images even more special
So which lens did you end up liking most if I may ask? I have the 1.2 and I am debating the 1.0 right now.
I am going to try to adapt it to my gfx100s and canon r5
Think you will enjoy the images coming from it.
Have you tried adapt this lens to Sony? How does it work with Sony manual focus? Thanks.
Hi, Did try it briefly. Focusing is pretty accurate.
@@btonelli But you do prefer to use with R5, don't you?
@@thanyawong due to high refresh rate on EVF and to me the focus peaking is more accurate
Are you off the 360 channel? I stopped watching it since you stopped making videos! Just subscribed.
Yes left last year. Now here and Geek Culture doing videos
@@btonelli then I am no longer interested in 360!
try it on the GFX.
I did. Tough to nail focus on it. When I magnify image in the EVF isn’t as clear as the R5
@@btonelli did it cover the sensor?
There is vignetting so will need to crop to 35mm mode
@@btonelli thanks
How does it perform when focusing on long distances at maximum aperture? I’m considering between this Voigtlander and Sony 50mm 1.2 GM (I have an autofocus adapter so AF is not a problem).
If you are going to be using AF then go for the 50 GM. Your hit rate will be much higher
I actually liked the chrome nose lenses because my cameras and most of my lenses have silver on them. A shame, hope they come up with alternatives like the 58mm or 28mm SL II lenses
Perhaps they will come up with those focal lengths in time to come.
I had nothing against the silver chrome noses either. I thought it was sharp.
Have this lens for 4 month now (use it on M11) and it really has that special look. I love it ✨👌🏼
Congrats! Yes it does
Not a lens for me but a very impressive piece of engineering from CV. This company is flying. Bring out a rangefinder body please!
Understand and agree. Would be nice for them to bring out another camera
Like to see a 25mm version for m4/3 users
Not sure there would be enough risers though to warrant the manufacturing.
Overall it looks like a no-brainer - but at 07:41, the bokeh balls of the Noctilux 50/1.0 show, what it is loved for...
You’re like… the JJ Reddick of camera reviewers
Haha thanks 😊
How does it compare to other Leica noctilux
It’s better than the F1 Noctiluxes. As far as the .95 I would say slightly sharper but very similar
@@btonelli This has been very useful for me.I`ve been looking a fast fifty . I`ve used a summicron for 20 years . Bodies are M`s ,CL and an sl2s. Can`t really justify the .95 (I`m just a happy snapper). This seems very much worth a look .Thanks .
@@absonus hi Michael thanks for watching. Yes this is a very good alternative and at a more reasonable price point
I really like the rendition of this lens. Especially @8:00 I must admit that I prefer the image from the Voigtländer to the Leica!
Yes it performs well!
i am 100% with you about those bloody chrome rings！！
Yep hopefully they don’t return 😊
Great review with nice samples. Although this lens is M Mount it’s was really design more for adapted use. On mirrorless it’s great on M camera it’s a pain in terms of viewing and focusing.
Thanks for watching. Yes definitely designed for mirrorless
1:26 ... A pouch would be good for storage, but I don't like it when companies over do the packaging. Too much waste.
Yes a pouch would be ideal
Voigtlender 50mm f1 RF vs Canon Rf 50mm f1.2
Just too bad about most review videos now that 95% of the video is looking at the guy making the videos rather than looking at the actual lens itself. In the “build quality” portion of example; the section is about 2 minutes and we see the lens a total of about 10 seconds or so from a far. The rest is looking at you talking into a microphone.
It’s the same with all the videos. Most of it is you and not the thing you’re talking about. You can save time getting pretty for the videos and just show us the gear.
Anyway. The king of 50s for me is a 50f2. It is small. It is light. It has enough separation. They are excellent at f8 and even f11, and now with digital you can literally shoot in any light.
A lens that is huge and heavy will just stay in the closet. I have a better chance taking a good photo with a light and small 50mm that can stay on my camera rather than in my closet.
For some reason people are obsessed with f1 and f0.95 lenses. But the fact is they are very niche special use lenses. The best most practical lens is the f2. If you really need more light, the tiny f1.5 Nokton is more than most people will ever need.
Thanks for watching and the reply.
To the point of it’s mainly me on camera, well my videos are based on my opinion and experience. Some will just show product shot after product shot but after a while that also gets boring.
Everyone has their preference in video and that’s the great thing about TH-cam.
In regards to the 50 f2 I agree with you and also prefer this size and aperture. F1 for me is nice but I won’t use it that much.
At this moment that title will likely go to the APO-Lanthar 50mm. Which I’m still waiting for.
Also a good choice.
@@btonelli could I ask which adaptor you used for the R5?
@@calvinchann1996 K&F Concept
Why do people keep talking about bokeh in modern, well-corrected lenses? There's almost no bokeh there. There's blur. The last ultra-bright 50 for Leicas that had actual bokeh was the Noctilux 50/1.0, then they went and ruined it completely for the sake of having the record-breaking f/0.95. It's sharper, better corrected, but lost the last bit of bokeh it had and only has clinical blur with no character. Waiting for Voigtlander to make a "Classic" version of this with 6 elements and a traditional double-gauss design with some actual character.
Interesting theory. When I was testing this lens I found the bokeh to be similar to the f1 but a bit more corrected. Less green rings around the light sources etc etc.
Hmm this is an unfair comparison of the Noctilux 0.95. I shoot it primarily on the SL2-S or the M10R and I get much better sharpness than the samples you show. I personally found that M lenses perform better on Leica bodies than my Sony FF bodies. You should redo this video and comparison on a M or SL bodies
Hi. I was comparing it to the Noctilux f1 not .95. I think you misunderstood the video
@@btonelli Ahh.. my apologies. I'll delete this comment after you see my reply
@@FarEastSurvival no prob. All good 👍
Dude, I throw the box in the closet and never use a bag. Save me a few bucks and don’t change a thing, Cosina!
Haha true but always good to have a pouch at least
we need more bokeh. not enough bokeh.
Haha okay 😉😊
Packaging means exactly nothing to me!
There isn’t a thing to cry about with the packaging.
Hmm when you purchase a lens from a company like LLL and others then you will see what I’m talking about
You have to wonder when the opening statements is rushing you to buy. I call bullshit.
I have no skin in this game, I’m just relating what I’ve been told about allocation. It’s not about making everyone run out and buy anything, and as I clearly stated at the end of the video, this lens isn’t for everyone and gave reasons why one should consider or not.
@@btonelli a good reason is the long wait for this special lens, probably due to the hand grinding and hand polishing of the front aspherical element.
@@ofeykalakar1 true. It definitely takes some time with this lens
The only benefit of the leather pouch will be to breed fungus. No thanks. I am glad Voigtlaender doesn't make us pay for one.
Well I disagree. If that’s the case leica users would have lots of complaints and even smaller companies like Light Lens Lab would also be similar
@@btonelli Well, plenty of info on environments conducive to lense fungus out there, and leather is just ideal, but feel free to ignore it. It is your video and your comments section after all.
@@yxx_chris_xxy I live in a hot and humid climate year round so used to mold and fungus.
These leather cases are treated and inside are usually foam or another material to protect the lens. Anyways all good, we have our opinions and no one is right or wrong. Just our thoughts.
So, we found you here know? I don't want to be subscribed to "dead" channels....Thanks
All good. Yes I’m here and Geek Culture :) thanks for the subscription!
Sorry, for non-native English speaking persons, you speak much too fast.
Ok apologies for that. Will slow it down for the next vid
@@btonelli thank you!
You can slow down the play back speed.
Thanks!
Thank you!!