How long until Baltimore's Key Bridge is replaced? Experts say it may be done sooner than expected

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 มี.ค. 2024
  • Baltimore's Francis Scott Key Bridge and its collapse will continue to hamper supply routes nationwide. Until this week, it was the second-longest continuous truss bridge in the United States.
    7News spoke to experts on when commuters could expect a replacement bridge.
    READ MORE: wjla.com/features/i-team/fran...
    _______________
    Stay up to date with our social media:
    7News on Facebook: / 7newsdc
    7News on Twitter: / 7newsdc
    7News on Instagram: / 7newsdc
    Subscribe to WJLA on TH-cam: / @7newsdc
    Daily News Playlist: • WJLA Washington, DC - ...
    For more information, visit wjla.com/
    Have a news tip? Send it directly to us:
    Email us: newsdesk@wjla.com
    Call the Newsroom: 703.236.9480
    WJLA is the local ABC affiliate for the greater Washington DC area. From our studios in Arlington, VA ABC7 covers national and local news, sports, and weather.
    #WJLA #DCNews #7NewsDC
    This video and all Sinclair Broadcast Group content archives of local news and sports coverage are available for your use. For more information contact us at contentsales@sbgtv.com

ความคิดเห็น • 457

  • @RevTox
    @RevTox 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    The Ship company and its insurance should pay for the bridge in full. Taxpayers shouldn't have to pay for it twice.

    • @Turboy65
      @Turboy65 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Let's wait until we know where the fault REALLY lies.

    • @briangasser973
      @briangasser973 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      No insurance policy is going to cover a $600M bridge.

    • @Dtuba15
      @Dtuba15 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think the White House already is already granting 50 million to reconstruction. If it’s from fema or another program like that than that makes sense. But I’m not sure where that’s coming from. (Im all for cutting back on spending) but I think the funds allocated from a specific source (someone please correct me if I’m wrong)

    • @alfred-vz8ti
      @alfred-vz8ti 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      the company will go bankrupt, the insurance will refuse to pay because of criminal negligence of ship company, and commuters will have to use a ferry boat.

    • @VanillaMacaron551
      @VanillaMacaron551 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@briangasser973 Well honestly it should and I don't see why not. This is why insurers run off and get secondary backing themselves via big guys like Lloyds of London.

  • @dikoman516
    @dikoman516 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    The supply chain can be restored as soon as the pathway is cleared. The construction of new bridge should not affect the supply chain.

    • @jaysky2000
      @jaysky2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @dikoman516 Yes! The port is still there!

    • @sweepingdenver
      @sweepingdenver 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah that distinction was handled incredibly poorly in this clip.

    • @paulhare662
      @paulhare662 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But, it will cause hundreds of thousands of extra miles driven creating co2 which will raise sea level and flood Baltimore.

    • @willythemailboy2
      @willythemailboy2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@paulhare662 laughably small in comparison to the situation in the Red Sea right now. It takes about a million dollars worth of fuel to go the long way vs through the Suez Canal.
      The two tunnels available for alternate routing should take some of that traffic rather than going all the way around.

    • @tonyatgoogle6076
      @tonyatgoogle6076 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Exactly, clear the debris and ships can move through it. This report is so dumb.

  • @tkyap2524
    @tkyap2524 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

    It's not the end of the world. Rebuild a better one. Technology is better now. Wish Baltimore well.

    • @justinhafner259
      @justinhafner259 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I agree but as a local that was our beautiful bridge.
      We just need time.

    • @freekfaro5606
      @freekfaro5606 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Technology was better when the new Tampa bay bridge was built. How many decades ago was that?

    • @ImpendingJoker
      @ImpendingJoker 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@freekfaro5606 Right but this bridge was built before the original Skyway bridge, and after that accident the Key bridge was never updated with better protection. Tampa got a new bridge, and Baltimore did nothing to protect their existing one. I'm sure "cost" was the biggest reason for not doing it but, if they'd of spent a few million in the 80's, they might not have to be paying 100's of millions up to maybe a billion now.

    • @freekfaro5606
      @freekfaro5606 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ImpendingJoker exactly. And I hear so often, even from Buttigiec: no one could have predicted! You can predict what's going in and out of Baltimore port. Certainly the bean counters at the Port Authority know what's going in and out and can make predictions too, if only because a berth for a cargo or container ship has to be booked in advance.
      Same goes for the bridge itself. No one would have predicted the amount, intensity and sort of traffic that's going over the bridge now. But you can count and predict it. I sure hope the bridge, especially the steel parts of it, were regularly inspected not only for corrosion, but also for stress cracks.

    • @nonegone7170
      @nonegone7170 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ImpendingJoker " if they'd of spent a few million in the 80's, they might not have to be paying 100's of millions up to maybe a billion now."
      Isn't that the slogan for the United States these days?

  • @tinetannies4637
    @tinetannies4637 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    *Prediction: Every business -- whether affected by this or not -- will jack up prices and blame it on "supply disruptions".*

    • @jaysky2000
      @jaysky2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sad but true!

  • @randolm7698
    @randolm7698 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    '2 to 3 years' - 'Wow, that's super fast!'.... I'm guessing the people-industries that used that bridge would disagree about that being 'super fast'.

    • @tommytomtom5531
      @tommytomtom5531 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Depends on which end of the whip you are on.

    • @Daywalker_27
      @Daywalker_27 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What would be an expectable time to build a bridge that should withstand +30k vehicles a day?

    • @HustleTownUSA69th
      @HustleTownUSA69th 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      That’s how long it took here in Houston to build our cable ship channel bridge. 2 yrs

    • @casadilla111
      @casadilla111 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      For sure, but to be fair if they re-built it in six months to a year it wouldn’t take a freighter to bring it down again.

    • @blolee-gc1sr
      @blolee-gc1sr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      only 7 days for china.

  • @mikesperanza6794
    @mikesperanza6794 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    “You can build a thousand bridges, but if one of them falls down, that’s all they remember you for !” old engineering saying!

    • @saludanite
      @saludanite 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Depends on the importance of the ONE that fell...

    • @mikesperanza6794
      @mikesperanza6794 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@saludanite ….. and whose fault it was!

  • @philipgrice1026
    @philipgrice1026 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Building a new bridge is not as important as getting the old collapsed one removed quickly so the port can reopen. Vehicular traffic has alternative routes. The ships don't!

    • @Skidderoperator
      @Skidderoperator 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Lotta layoffs at the port & trucking businesses.

    • @CantonBn
      @CantonBn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@Skidderoperator hardly any layoffs are expected. The channel and bride remnants will be cleared in three to four weeks. In the meantime most port workers will be moved temporarily to Port Elisabeth and to Norfolk, both of which have excess capacity

    • @Skidderoperator
      @Skidderoperator 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AnX8765 The dead are sandwiched between fallen roadbed and iron, they say.

    • @mrcoz1764
      @mrcoz1764 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They can be rerouted to Virginia,,the port there is clear

  • @DavidJohnson-tv2nn
    @DavidJohnson-tv2nn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    @ 1:56 Notice the excellent pier protection around the main piers of the Sunshine Skyway bridge.

    • @CensoredByYouTube965
      @CensoredByYouTube965 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Crazy enough, on May 9, 1980, the storm-blinded Summit Venture freighter slammed into the support columns of the old Sunshine Skyway bridge. A 1,200-foot span of the bridge collapsed into the water below.

    • @ferdburful6352
      @ferdburful6352 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Sure. But that was installed after a ship hit that bridge and took it down

    • @DavidJohnson-tv2nn
      @DavidJohnson-tv2nn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@ferdburful6352 Exactly. Unfortunately, lessons weren't learned. Because here we go again with another disaster in Baltimore.

    • @borderite88
      @borderite88 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not just the towers but all ramps are as well!

    • @jackburton7062
      @jackburton7062 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@DavidJohnson-tv2nnall the major bridges around me were retrofited years ago. Im guessing this was a budget issue that the corrupt politicians didn't want to fund.

  • @parttimetourist
    @parttimetourist 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I am a Bridge Builder/ Engineer and from what I have seen there is no solid abutment and reinforced wall structure which might have saved the collapse of the bridge
    The thin pillar arrangement offers little resistance against lateral movement causing the collapse

    • @Rimrock300
      @Rimrock300 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      50 years old. Better standards today

  • @nancyreid1433
    @nancyreid1433 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Nobody passed legislation to help the people affected by chemicals from train derailment in Ohio
    Fed ignored. If dont help one dont help other.

  • @funkyfinnegan
    @funkyfinnegan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    We built a new 2.1 mile cable stay bridge in Montreal. It was finished in 2019, took 4 years and cost $400 million.

    • @PauloAdriano-zo2ng
      @PauloAdriano-zo2ng 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Quebec probably has a Unionized Workforce. 😮

  • @jimfesta8981
    @jimfesta8981 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Don't be surprised when the bridge that is rebuilt is no longer named the Francis Scott Key Bridge.

    • @davidcolwell614
      @davidcolwell614 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Not unless Francis Scott Key was an African American lesbian.

    • @jmg8246
      @jmg8246 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's gonna name after a demcrap politician with all the boxes checked...

    • @kirkbradford5765
      @kirkbradford5765 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      EXACTLY!!

    • @jackm6593
      @jackm6593 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kind of a bad omen tbh. Like naming your new ship the Titanic.

    • @jimfesta8981
      @jimfesta8981 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jackm6593 Not really. The U.S. Navy renamed the second aircraft carrier the USS Hornet after the first one was sunk by the Japanese. Won several battle stars and is tied up in Alameda, CA.

  • @_Boregard_Rippy_
    @_Boregard_Rippy_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    .. it was only servicing 35,000 vehicles a day so a low priority to replace IMO ...!

  • @JohnCzarnyJr
    @JohnCzarnyJr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I agree. A cable stay with pier protection is a good replacement.

    • @borderite88
      @borderite88 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Vancouver just replaced their port Mann bridge, similar arch design from 1965 with a new cable stayed bridge, part of the trans Canada hwy. Along with the Alex Frasier and Golden Ears as cable stayed bridges

    • @limwiching2277
      @limwiching2277 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Immersed tunnel more better.

    • @norman7179
      @norman7179 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@limwiching2277
      What about tanker trucks and hazardous materials ?
      Those are not allowed in tunnels.

  • @iamyoda7917
    @iamyoda7917 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    5 years of planning, 5 more years of construction, and 100% over budget. Job will be well done.

    • @billy.7113
      @billy.7113 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Biden can call Xi. A new bridge will be Made in China and shipped to Baltimore in 12 months. 😀😂

    • @what9621
      @what9621 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Oh oh, dont forget kickbacks.

    • @jmg8246
      @jmg8246 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You forget about the 5 years to remove the bridge debris.

  • @floridasaltlife
    @floridasaltlife 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Don't get too excited, it just took 2 years to repaint the Sky Way cables here in Tampa.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      and the tampa bridge over 3 times biger and none union labor,= red state Maryland a lot smaller bridge union labor blue state 4 years

    • @maxB2262
      @maxB2262 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dknowles60 union iron strong

  • @johngalt1967
    @johngalt1967 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    my guess is at least 5 years

    • @paulhare662
      @paulhare662 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      4 years 7 months 23 days.

  • @thomaspowers5486
    @thomaspowers5486 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The Ambassador Bridge, a suspension bridge which spans the Detroit River and connects Michigan to Canada, was constructed in 2 years, from 1927 through 1929. The Gordie Howe Bridge, a cable stay bridge, which also spans the Detroit River, is under construction and near completion.

    • @dfirth224
      @dfirth224 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are TH-cam videos of the Gordie Howe construction progress.

    • @jamesadams893
      @jamesadams893 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you saying the Howe Bridge under construction and near completion was started in 1929. Wow that is fast to put up a bridge

  • @bargdaffy1535
    @bargdaffy1535 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I live by the Skyway Bridge in St. Pete, it took forever. The new bridge took five years to build, was 19 months late and ran $20 million over budget when it opened in 1987.

  • @ls4085
    @ls4085 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A stay cable bridge should be the most reasonable option. Faster construction, more span length. The biggest key should be how long the budgeting and designing take. Sunshine Skyway Bridge took 3 years until construction start and another 4 years for construction.

  • @nancyvalentine7180
    @nancyvalentine7180 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    NO ONE EVER USED THE WORDS.....SAFETY....THAT'S THE KEY FOR THE "KEY" BRIDGE!

    • @brianhawkins
      @brianhawkins 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why does it even need to be said?

  • @ricklord7144
    @ricklord7144 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A dollar to a donut says the pliers I ordered on Amazon are in one of those shipping containers!! Great!

    • @ricklord7144
      @ricklord7144 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AnX8765 Surely you know I jest! Just said to make a point! This insane catastrophe will no doubt cost all of us, big time!!!

  • @lakerskid2013
    @lakerskid2013 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That is very possible it can be done in 2 years with a new bridge and it being designed like the one in Tampa. Although the bridge collapse in Minneapolis was under different circumstances, that took them 2 years to replace the one they have now so it is possible that it could be done in that amount of time.

    • @WesB1972
      @WesB1972 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You must be smoking weed. It 7 years to design and build a new bridge over Tampa Bay.

    • @lakerskid2013
      @lakerskid2013 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@WesB1972 I don’t smoke, never have and never will so terrible assumption right there. If the design is closer to that one then I would say 3-4 years. There have been too many advances in technology since then for this new Francis Scott Key Bridge to take anything more than 5 years to get done. The design after the cleanup will really determine how long it takes for a new bridge to come up.

  • @boondoggle4820
    @boondoggle4820 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    My guess is that they’ll have the port open for cargo ships in no more than two months. I think it’ll take at least five years to build a new bridge.

    • @jamesricker3997
      @jamesricker3997 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I predict it will be open in June.

  • @mahadaalvi
    @mahadaalvi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I’d prefer a more structurally sound and future proof bridge over a quickly constructed one.

    • @VanillaMacaron551
      @VanillaMacaron551 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't know Baltimore but maybe they should move the port? A hundred years ago, ships came right into wharves in what is now the central business district of Brisbane (Queensland, Australia). I guess as ships got bigger, they moved the docks further out, closer to Moreton Bay and the Pacific Ocean. Big cruise liners now dock at Hamilton (after coming under the Gateway bridges) and a massive new port has been built (mostly on reclaimed land) for cargo out near the river mouth. Thus cargo ships don't go under any bridges coming into the Port of Brisbane.

  • @user-je7ih1wo9c
    @user-je7ih1wo9c 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They built a new bridge in Australia in 6 months.

  • @DP-hy4vh
    @DP-hy4vh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The new bridge should be a suspension bridge like the Golden Gate or Mackinac Bridge. A cable stay still has the same defect as the old bridge; two concrete columns that can be knocked down. A suspension bridge's towers can be spaced far apart and leave plenty of extra room for ship traffic.

    • @scottkozel1519
      @scottkozel1519 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A suspension bridge's towers can still be hit and destroyed by a huge ship.

  • @siamcharm7904
    @siamcharm7904 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    if you want top quality in half the time and cost, call china. no one does bridges like cn.

    • @MarcABrown-tt1fp
      @MarcABrown-tt1fp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      AHAHAHAHAH! Nice joke, what's next? Hire China to build apartments out of soda cans and glass bottles? X-D

  • @norman7179
    @norman7179 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I hope they add two more lanes in each direction to accommodate future traffic loads.

  • @Phantom1963
    @Phantom1963 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    After the cleanup, probably about 6 to 8 weeks....

  • @scottkozel1519
    @scottkozel1519 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It doesn't need more than 4 lanes, AADT has been flat at about 31,000 since 2006.
    The latest bridges over major shipping channels are in the 215 foot vertical clearance range. That is 30 feet more the FSKB. A bridge like that would about 2 miles long to meet that profile, and with shallower grades maybe 2.2 or 2.4 miles.
    Costwise a 4-lane tunnel would be likely less than such a bridge. Tunnel approaches and causeways were built in the early 1970s. They would need to build a 6,200 foot long tunnel and open approaches.
    My solution would be a tunnel as on the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel and the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel and I-664 Bridge-Tunnel.
    No bridge over the shipping channel.

  • @chaspfrank
    @chaspfrank 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    3 years is a pipe dream. 1 year for design, engineering and test boring for new piers and dolphins (during which the old span can be completely removed; at least 6 months to get contracts in place and arrange for all of the lift (cranes) needed to build; another year for materials sourcing, initial fabrication plus locating and fitting out all of the required staging locations, and; 2 to 3 years for construction. 5 years would be a pretty realistic schedule. Keep in mind there are still other considerations: Can they use the existing approach spans and piers, considering they are now close to 50 years old? Or do you have to build new from shoreline to shoreline? If that is the case, you are talking about a total of about 8500 feet of new bridge construction plus possibly re-alignment of I-695 at either end. There a quite a few complicated decisions that need to be made very quickly, the first being who is going to be the lead agency in charge. So all things considered, my money is on 5 years.

    • @jmg8246
      @jmg8246 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank god to the good old American union...

  • @markdanielczyk944
    @markdanielczyk944 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hopefully the reconstruction will be done properly. When things are rushed, quality suffers.

  • @oliver9089
    @oliver9089 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    This is definitely a site for a cable stay bridge, but 2 years would be a miracle. The government is involved. 5 years absolute minimum, probably closer to 10.

    • @greg2976
      @greg2976 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      💯💯👍👍

    • @kosycat1
      @kosycat1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No way they are going to let it drag on for 10 years

    • @redstonerelic
      @redstonerelic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You can do things surprisingly fast when you have the money to do it.

    • @kingy002
      @kingy002 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And you credentials are for making such sweeping statements???

    • @oliver9089
      @oliver9089 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @kingy002 I actually do. And the fastest concept to completion balance cantilever construction method I've ever seen was about 10 years. In this case, being an election year, Biden will probably announce funding in the next few weeks. But it won't actually exist, and there will be years of consulting along with demolition of existing parts before anyone starts even tendering out. Ideally a design-build contractor to speed it up a little. But more likely a P3 because the funding will flop after the election and the government will have to get another toll bridge built.

  • @billymacktexasdetective5827
    @billymacktexasdetective5827 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That's interesting. Paul W. Smith had a guest on his show today that said the auto industry WOULDN'T be affected by this.
    Who is correct?

    • @jaysky2000
      @jaysky2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @billymacktexasdetective5827 The bridge is gone so vehicular traffic is affected. They'll have to find new routes. But the port is still there. Once they clear the debris the ships can come through again.

  • @sspp3065
    @sspp3065 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    So what your saying is we can build a super structured bridge faster than we can add 2 lanes of highway for 10 miles.I will believe it when I see it,or is it a case of milking the clock for regular road improvements.

    • @rectorkirk1158
      @rectorkirk1158 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not niw a days. All the metal comes from china

  • @CreamyBone
    @CreamyBone 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Trucks that carry loads not allowed in tunnels can still take the west side of the beltway? --- I'd think that once the debris is cleared and the port reopened, things could return to pretty close to normal

    • @justinhafner259
      @justinhafner259 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except for the traffic here, it's a nightmare now. I leave much earlier to go in and come home.

  • @WesB1972
    @WesB1972 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It took 7 years to design and build a new bridge over Tampa bay in the early 1980s.

  • @ferdburful6352
    @ferdburful6352 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Some have mentioned the skyway bridge near Tampa. I believe this was hit and collapsed in 1980 killing 35.

  • @gorgar6059
    @gorgar6059 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    W Polsce ekspertyzy urzędnicze, środowiskowe, konsultacje społeczne, audyty trwałyby 15 lat, a na koniec ogłoszono by przetarg publiczny "zaprojektuj i wybuduj" z terminem realizacji 12 miesięcy wraz z pozwoleniem na użytkowanie. A! I oczywiście w przetargu mieliby 1/3 potrzebnych pieniędzy.

  • @289cobra9
    @289cobra9 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is What build back better looks like!

  • @donarrivas1675
    @donarrivas1675 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The cost of new replacing FSK bridge is set in the range of $1B USD, according to Loretta Warter, spokesperson of the Institute of the Insurance Media. Bruce Carnegie Brown, Chair of the Lloyd's, said that he would be surprised if the whole incident would cost less than few billions of dollars. Analyst Brenden Holmes of Moody said that there are about 80 diff insurance companies cover $3B USD for the owner of Dali while Barclay's analysts believe that the final number would be in $3B USD.
    However, the Dali owner, Grace Ocean Private of Singapore, may be spared someway on the heavy cost due to the limited liability of the 1851 international law which says, the ocean merchant ship owner legal liability is limited on the value of the ship including the merchandises carrying onboard.

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are off a few digits, I will be amazed if construction costs less than $3 Billion

    • @jmg8246
      @jmg8246 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, remember the BIG D1CK in Boston...@@bob80q

  • @cactusyaya
    @cactusyaya 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    2-3 years is very optimistic I see it more like two billion with the cost over-runs taking one year for engineering and fabrication and permits with the project running 3-5 years.

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Optimistic for sure, 3-4 Billion is more realistic

    • @lakerskid2013
      @lakerskid2013 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The next closest thing we’ve had as far as a major bridge collapse is the one from Minneapolis in 2007. Now granted it was nothing like this one in Baltimore in terms of circumstances, length, etc but I do think that is something to keep in mind on how anything is possible. I know there would be much more to build as far as this replacement versus the one there but that took them 2 years as well so it could be a possibility at least.

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lakerskid2013 you obviously forgot the Sunshine Skyway

    • @lakerskid2013
      @lakerskid2013 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bob80q I’m talking about as far as anything recent but I do know about that one too. They’re going to have to build the replacement similar to that one

  • @langstonholland9272
    @langstonholland9272 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Skyway bridge isn't in Tampa.

  • @verdebusterAP
    @verdebusterAP 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    its going to take months to clear the wreckage
    Those pieces thousands of tons and you both cranes and barges able handle such mass
    Then consider that port is active so trying to build while still allow ships to free move is another challenge in itself
    So its going to be a while

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      the one that goot knock down in Tapma Fl 3 times longer 3 times heaver apx 1 month, tampa also has port traffic

    • @dougr2665
      @dougr2665 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      you all talk like you know something actually you don't ahahahaa

    • @Skidderoperator
      @Skidderoperator 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The ruined bridge will be in china in a month. Bet.

    • @BSnicks
      @BSnicks 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Skidderoperator Nah, it will be in India. Only India takes in scrap metal.

  • @norman7179
    @norman7179 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Remember when we had plenty of steel mills in the U S ?

  • @ericheine2414
    @ericheine2414 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I can get a combination pizza in 15 minutes. Don't you just have a extra bridge laying around that nobody wants.
    Maybe some cold beer.

  • @wmason1961
    @wmason1961 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Isn't there enough steel in the key bridge to rebuild the key bridge? If not, why not? What will happen to all that steel?

  • @billbright1755
    @billbright1755 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An opportunity to make a positive from a negative.
    If the decision is to replace then a much more efficient structure could be utilized.
    The cleaning of the harbor water traffic lanes can be given top priority.
    Reroute planning must be instituted in interim period.
    Quality bridges by nature take a significant time frame from planning to fruition period.
    No construction techniques or materials are left out of consideration in planning phases.
    I’m sure a successful bridge builder could design a project suitable for the geologic requirements of the Patapsco River Harbor.
    Should a new Key Bridge be constructed ribbon cutting event certainly would be a very proud day for Baltimore and indeed all of the United States 🇺🇸 of America.

  • @wulung5943
    @wulung5943 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Should not take more than 6 months with China speed to replace the bridge

  • @Turboy65
    @Turboy65 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It'll be very interesting to see how quickly a bridge like this can be replaced if the industry applies maximum effort.

    • @rectorkirk1158
      @rectorkirk1158 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unions applying maximum effort of builking the taxpayers.

    • @Turboy65
      @Turboy65 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rectorkirk1158 I'm certainly no fan of unions either. They suck. There was a time when they existed to keep employees from being exploited by the companies, but today it's gone way too far and unions exist to screw the companies and give the workers no incentive to EARN their paychecks.

  • @MrJerrad79
    @MrJerrad79 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    While the world is distracted watching this....what is slipping under the radar elsewhere?

    • @nicksalgado22
      @nicksalgado22 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Everything is a distraction. Like shit happens. All the time. Like seek help. U need it

    • @craftingretired
      @craftingretired 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Trump😂

    • @samuelw.3992
      @samuelw.3992 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your not wrong man

  • @Mrfort
    @Mrfort 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It looks as though MOST of the steel for the bridge could be reclaimed??

  • @thomaslanders2073
    @thomaslanders2073 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The US is an industrial pipsqueak today. The fact that it would take 3 years to build a simple bridge like this is evidence of the fact. 🙄

  • @CensoredByYouTube965
    @CensoredByYouTube965 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This reporter clearly doesn't have a daily commute from one side to the other.

    • @whatever8282828
      @whatever8282828 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They're excited about the speed of it. It's gonna be years no matter what. Do you think the gov't will set up ferries there?

  • @DADDYO3
    @DADDYO3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Why do they keep saying that the Key bridge collapsed. It didn't collapse. It was knocked down by a large boat. sheesh.

    • @Islamisthecultofsin
      @Islamisthecultofsin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A large boat would be a 30 footer. It was a massive container ship.

    • @darthkillerhog
      @darthkillerhog 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Exactly it collapsed the whole bridge

    • @norman7179
      @norman7179 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It's BROKE !

  • @sbrazwell42
    @sbrazwell42 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Maybe put some of those dolphins out there for protection

    • @joed3483
      @joed3483 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      This is an underrated comment. After the collapse of the sunshine bridge the new bridge was given pylon collision protection in the form of cement dolphins and beach induction. I am not sure why the key bridge (and for that matter all bridges) was not retrofitted with this after the sunshine collapse. This was especially relevant given how that channel to and from Baltimore was so narrow. Honestly, if we fail to learn from accidents, we are doomed to repeat them. Pilots say that every item on their flight check lists are written in blood. This is also true about how our infrastructure contributes to disaster.

    • @turkN9NE
      @turkN9NE 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      key bridge didn't have dolphins because it was already too limited in space. this is what ive found

    • @seeharvester
      @seeharvester 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don't know about dolphins. Maybe whales. They're bigger.

    • @sbrazwell42
      @sbrazwell42 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@turkN9NE
      Didnt know that..they will have to think if something else or this will repeat

    • @warchief9347
      @warchief9347 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@turkN9NEDolphins can clearly be seen at the Key Bridge at 1:10.

  • @michaelm1436
    @michaelm1436 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I was waiting for all the hype about people having trouble getting goods. Another gimmick to raise prices even more. Clear the existing bridge and water way is open again. All ports are back to normal. So stop the bull shit.

  • @nathanduckeorth806
    @nathanduckeorth806 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Won't take no time at all,as long you send some Union workers that are Skilled in bridge construction!

    • @frankblangeard8865
      @frankblangeard8865 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes, skilled workers from Central America.

    • @nathanduckeorth806
      @nathanduckeorth806 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@frankblangeard8865 they only work at nite

  • @joeltender5181
    @joeltender5181 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And the fact that cargo ships have multiple failsafes incase of power loss. To help steer and a generator to maintain some electrical.

  • @JasonK1982
    @JasonK1982 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’ll take 5-10yrs

  • @mrcoz1764
    @mrcoz1764 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Get those guys from Philly who fixed I 95 after the collapse in a week

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interstates and bridges are two completely different projects, get a clue

  • @jamesmurray8558
    @jamesmurray8558 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Was the Mothman near it?

  • @MrBluoct
    @MrBluoct 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The entire now and expanding distribution warehouse infrastructure on the old Beth steel peninsula and the now stressed travel time studies

  • @jwboatdesigns
    @jwboatdesigns 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'd think that the harbourmasters staff will have already been on the phone to find the biggest crane barges on the East Coast and across the Atlantic in UK and further.

  • @Dark_Asteroid
    @Dark_Asteroid 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Only a couple of years? Super neato!

  • @user-ev3mi1jb1o
    @user-ev3mi1jb1o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It took 5 years to build the bridge

  • @HighlanDre4573
    @HighlanDre4573 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Everything never happens by accident, surely there are so many precedent negligence on the part of MV Dali vessel and technical organisation as a whole...

  • @Campbell464
    @Campbell464 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Definitely 3 years aggressively to rebuild! But it’s a global necessity.

  • @kovidswole2953
    @kovidswole2953 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    People are STILL MISSING! That’s more important!

  • @deanvoss7098
    @deanvoss7098 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    5 years from now it still will not be done...
    2 to 3 years 😂...

  • @onlineaccount63
    @onlineaccount63 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey, doesn't the former president know something about building a bridge???

  • @PECMS
    @PECMS หลายเดือนก่อน

    It should have redundancy on the cable system such as Dames Moore in Jax Fl will be better, although uglier

  • @kosycat1
    @kosycat1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As somone who used that bridge twice a day for the last 3 years and thousands of times in my life. I don't think they should go rushing into building a new bridge.Although I do think they will get It done fast. 5 years seems realistic. I don't think they will let it drag on to 7-10 years. 30k cars doesn't sound like much but for Baltimore it is. During the day that bridge was bumper to bumper cars and trucks going 65 mph . If this happened during the day a hundred or more people would have been dead missing or injured. They do need to focus on clearing the shipping channel, and removing all the debris and finding the two missing people. I thin it was a good cal lto not wait around to much and putting divers at risk. I don't want to say i knew this was going to happen but i always knew it was a reality and thought of it offen going over it and the bay bridges i also have to go over every day. I liked the key bridge man. it was a nice route away from the city and was one of the highlites of my drive. I liked it better than the bay bridges which are constantly filled wth traffic. You could sometimes get a moment of peace up there in the otherwise very stressful cumte plain. The 895 tunnel is not really in the best shape either,and they never removed the toll lanes so its going to get quite backed up. the first few days were not so bad,even with heavy rain but we will see.I may get a new job

  • @PeterDivine
    @PeterDivine 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "especially if the feds are in charge"
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA oh god he's serious

  • @HustleTownUSA69th
    @HustleTownUSA69th 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That’s what we have in Houston at our Port. Cables!!

  • @brucediamond8570
    @brucediamond8570 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How hell do we know how long it will take don't worry about it

  • @jimc3786
    @jimc3786 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Black swan

  • @charcushman9507
    @charcushman9507 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    They are stuupid to not be using TUG BOATS.

    • @borderite88
      @borderite88 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      In another video they disengaged as the ship picked up speed. If they stayed any longer at that pace, chances are they could have been dragged by the ship itself.

    • @Meibeon
      @Meibeon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      check facts first,write nonsense later

  • @judynagle7435
    @judynagle7435 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    buying local solves everything - keeps the waters cleaner too I'd imagine

  • @Xerdoz
    @Xerdoz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can tell you exactly how long it takes. Until it's finished.

  • @spudspuddy
    @spudspuddy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dali, same as the artist Savador Dali who painted THE BROKEN BRIDGE...which is a painting of a bridge with half snapped off

  • @stewatparkpark2933
    @stewatparkpark2933 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tunnel ?

  • @hifijohn
    @hifijohn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The original bridge cost $1.9B by today's money Im curious what the new bridge will cost.

    • @CantonBn
      @CantonBn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      original bridge was budgeted 60 million and ultimately cost $110 million. That is about $500 million in today's dollars, not $1.9B. given steel has risen more than inflation and new building code, environmental regs tetc, you are looking at an estimated $900 ,million

  • @user-ks1vr5hg5r
    @user-ks1vr5hg5r 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Find out who had it destroyed

  • @fpiedade9451
    @fpiedade9451 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is very fast
    New tecnologies

  • @abrahamphilip6439
    @abrahamphilip6439 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    More rhan a billion $ question is the fact the cause of the Crash may never come out lest Insurance/Compensation be denied for the Pilots/officals erranous actions when faced with an emergency situation,

  • @sudhirsaxena8202
    @sudhirsaxena8202 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If they start with 180 days time line , they can rebuild broken span in 8 months . China has the expertise and is well equipped seeing its track record.

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You need to get off that ecstasy dude

  • @davidhoffmann6771
    @davidhoffmann6771 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Skyway bridge in Forida(St Petersburg/Brandon not Tampa )

    • @americangiant1003
      @americangiant1003 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think this Reporter was talking the entire Tampa Bay region where the replacement bridge is currently located. Just like the new Tappan Zee/Late NY Governor Mario Cuomo is located just outside of NYC.

  • @robertab929
    @robertab929 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Protection systems, like dolphins, should be installed around EXISTING BRIDGES on Chesapeake Bay and in places like Patapsco River in Baltimore.
    Also new Key Bridge should have these protections.
    Protection systems should be build exceeding today standards. Ships are getting bigger and bigger.

  • @suegrine4626
    @suegrine4626 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The city of Baltimore needs to go after the company of the ship that ran into their bridge. They should pay for all damages that they had done to this bridge. It shouldn’t come from our government or the people it should come from Singapore

    • @andrewwarcup684
      @andrewwarcup684 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Insurance will probably pay for most of it.

  • @Alwayslifted
    @Alwayslifted 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    took the 6 years to build cable bridge in boston and that is 60% the size of that bridge. The unions will milk it for every dime they can tons of cost overruns trust me it will take more like 6-8 years

    • @jamesricker3997
      @jamesricker3997 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They were in no rush to do it because the rest of the highway wasn't complete.

    • @jmg8246
      @jmg8246 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They gonna ask advise from the Union members who rebuild NYS Tappan Zee bridge...

  • @belamoure
    @belamoure 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Suspended bridges are all the rage now and a lot of steel can be recuperated from the river let,s use the old one, melt it again and re-used it all! Such a pelasure to re-use old steel.

    • @hyphydan
      @hyphydan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All the steel will come from China, like the SF-Oakland Bay Bridge.

  • @jonathanlayne-gordon9007
    @jonathanlayne-gordon9007 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just a couple years...

  • @brian.7966
    @brian.7966 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    take a couple of years ??? really that long.

  • @jamesmcmurray6871
    @jamesmcmurray6871 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not as fast as it took you to take it down

    • @WesB1972
      @WesB1972 หลายเดือนก่อน

      5 seconds!!!

  • @Mr58hawkeye
    @Mr58hawkeye 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They should get the Amish to build it.. they could do it in 1 day

    • @jaysky2000
      @jaysky2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Mr58hawkeye Did you hear that the Amish offered to build the southern border wall? I saw a video recently and he said they were willing to come from all over the country and could get it done in no time.

  • @darth.severu5
    @darth.severu5 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    China: we are not interested

  • @peterrivney552
    @peterrivney552 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I need coal for my bar-b-que and what about car parts there hard enough as ut is to get them...

  • @tigertiger1699
    @tigertiger1699 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would ya not put a tunnel through.. ffs