10:54 Daz, regarding the lie detector test - " If he's guilty, why would he agree to it...unless he thinks he can fool it?" Conversely, in his mind, he's likely reasoning, "If I'm innocent, why wouldn't I agree...if I don't, I'll look guilty?"
Polygraph tests are not allowed in court. Its basically a police/detective tactic to have more to build their case on & possibly sometimes gets the confession due to fear & nerves. *From what i understand
They're basically a prop that a skilled interviewer can use to get more information. All they really do is detect nervousness which means very little. However, a great many people don't know that. The interviewer can say you're lying here or there or whatever regardless of what the machine indicates.
@@silikon2 yup even if you pass with flying colours they'll probably tell you you failed, then you're like 'oh sh*t they know i'll just come clean', makes it easy for them
@@silikon2I had to take one for a job. All I know is it worked on me. They do a baseline at first and ask you things that they know is true. Then they ask you basic things they don't know the answer to and tell your to lie. Like asking you to pick a number and lie about it... every time I tried to lie I got caught. There was no need for me to be nervous, this is just testing, not real questions they care about abs I was convincing that the machine would catch me and it did every single time!
I took a polygraph years ago. They said I lied and everything I answered was the complete truth because I had nothing to lie about. I would never agree to take one again. Luckily a trial proved my innocence. I will say however that a detective lied his arse off on the witness stand. I lost a lot of faith with police officers after that. He didn't fib a little, he flat out lied and knew it.
I think here in the US it comes down to the state that you're in, same as with some states having 2 party consent laws regarding recording someone without their knowledge and it being used as evidence. As someone whose been polygraphed, like she said your blood pressure, your biological response can have an effect, even if you're actually telling the truth regarding the question asked. That said, there's those that just have that ego and think that they're the one in a million that will pass the test. Then there's those who truly believe what they know to be truthful, just for it to come out that it was a lie. But at this point they take all that into account and usually have you take multiple polygraphs and see if your results are consistent, least that's what happened with me.
Polygraph's are inadmissible in every court in the U.S., to use in prosecution; they're unscientific. They can be admitted if both defense and prosecution agree to use the results though.
Polygraph are basically just so the detectives can use the results to make the suspect panic & let their guard down & potentially lead them into confessing or opening up and saying more. If the suspect is a bit smarter & knows this then that tactic probably wouldn’t work
Polygraph tests are normally not admissible in court. There are some exceptions such as military tribunals, in normal court at the discretion of the Judge or if agreed to by both parties. - It does not matter whether she has "friends with benefits", the fact is he assumed the role of protector, she did not want him to be her protector, he is obviously trying to control what she does, where she lives and who she sees, speaks to, or allows to stay in her house - it is not his business, he has no claim to her. I don't understand what her lifestyle has anything to do with anything. The defence is that he should only get 10 years because of her age and ill health, that does not mean she's on drugs or an alcoholic. He killed her and should be in prison.
In Japan, India and Indonesia, polygraph evidence is admissible in court. In the United States, most states permit polygraph test results to be used as evidence where parties have agreed to their admissibility before the examination is given, under the terms of a stipulation.
Sounds like she had normal dates but he wanted to make it sound like she was a streetwalker, which she wasn’t. She refused his advances & even reported them to the police!
Daz, your right. He wanted to admit it anyway. Most murderers do. That was why the officer used that technique. It works moody of the time. He got real close to him, acting like his friend, should no judgment, told him he was a good guy and whst he did was a mistake. It lowers their guard and give them an excuse to confessm they're not a bad person if it was an accident. However most of the time it isn't an accident they just hope everyone believes that it was.
14:30 they told him that they are searching his house and found stuff, and telling him he failed the poly is just a bluff. they want him to think its all over so he will just say fuck it and confess
Polygraph tests aren’t used in court but it gives the detectives something to go on. People take them because they think they can beat them. Even if you’re nervous the test will show you answer your control questions correctly. If you can answer those questions and it doesn’t show you’re lying then you should be able to answer all questions without lying if you’re innocent. Also don’t forget that cops are allowed to lie to you to get your confession.
I'd never take a polygraph no matter what they were asking me about. Overall they probably work well, but they can give false positives. Stick to the evidence. Aside from that, I'm skeptical that many cops eliminate a suspect based primarily on a polygraph result, anyway.
@Vendrix86 1st, I'm not a "bud". My name is literally "mom..." on here. 😅😅 2nd, it's an honest question. It's hard to tell what's a brit a or r for Americans. 🤷♀️ & I rarely look at descriptions, just probably should. 😉🙃
The detective knew exactly what he was doing and was in control the whole time. The use of the polygraph is standard police technique. It is not used to prove innocence or guilt but as a catalyst to further the investigation. It worked. Well done, Springfield MO detective.
Gay must still be watching old Detective series. With cameras everywhere today, you're not going to get away with anything. Besides, these detectives today as so much better trained than in the past, they know exactly what they're doing.
They play the role of friend/understanding..ohh..I know you're a good man this isn't how you are but something happened.. Many will confess.. They'll tell you you need to get it off your chest cause God knows what you did.. things like that.
I always wanted to be a psychologist too. Turns out I need to be on the other side of the couch lol Gaynor, if you haven't read the book Mindhunter by John Douglas, I highly recommend it. John was one of the best, if not the best, criminal profilers in the early days of profiling. It's fascinating to know how a criminal like a serial killer thinks. He could even tell what color car a criminal drove!
@aj897 You're talking about the show. I'm talking about the book long before the show. I've never even seen the show, but I imagine after a while they'd have to add some embellishments or something. You don't have to with a book.
I will never understand why interrogation rooms have the shittiest camera and mic. It seems like it should be the place with the best quality equipment.
10:54 Daz, regarding the lie detector test - " If he's guilty, why would he agree to it...unless he thinks he can fool it?"
Conversely, in his mind, he's likely reasoning, "If I'm innocent, why wouldn't I agree...if I don't, I'll look guilty?"
“A few friends with benefits” LOL love y’all! 🍻
The guilty will place themselves into investigation also to try to see what cops know already.
I don’t know why people being questioned don’t lawyer up!
Polygraph tests are not allowed in court. Its basically a police/detective tactic to have more to build their case on & possibly sometimes gets the confession due to fear & nerves. *From what i understand
They're basically a prop that a skilled interviewer can use to get more information.
All they really do is detect nervousness which means very little. However, a great many people don't know that. The interviewer can say you're lying here or there or whatever regardless of what the machine indicates.
@@silikon2 yup even if you pass with flying colours they'll probably tell you you failed, then you're like 'oh sh*t they know i'll just come clean', makes it easy for them
Never forget the photo copier machine scene in The Wire lol
@@silikon2I had to take one for a job. All I know is it worked on me. They do a baseline at first and ask you things that they know is true. Then they ask you basic things they don't know the answer to and tell your to lie. Like asking you to pick a number and lie about it... every time I tried to lie I got caught. There was no need for me to be nervous, this is just testing, not real questions they care about abs I was convincing that the machine would catch me and it did every single time!
Actually, lie detectors are admissible in court IF the defendant agrees to allow it to be before they start the test.
He should have hired a Lawyer right after the first interview.
I took a polygraph years ago. They said I lied and everything I answered was the complete truth because I had nothing to lie about. I would never agree to take one again. Luckily a trial proved my innocence. I will say however that a detective lied his arse off on the witness stand. I lost a lot of faith with police officers after that. He didn't fib a little, he flat out lied and knew it.
Yees love these reacts, i've been spending the last few nights rewatching these crime reactions from you and gaynor!
I think here in the US it comes down to the state that you're in, same as with some states having 2 party consent laws regarding recording someone without their knowledge and it being used as evidence. As someone whose been polygraphed, like she said your blood pressure, your biological response can have an effect, even if you're actually telling the truth regarding the question asked. That said, there's those that just have that ego and think that they're the one in a million that will pass the test. Then there's those who truly believe what they know to be truthful, just for it to come out that it was a lie. But at this point they take all that into account and usually have you take multiple polygraphs and see if your results are consistent, least that's what happened with me.
Polygraph's are inadmissible in every court in the U.S., to use in prosecution; they're unscientific. They can be admitted if both defense and prosecution agree to use the results though.
Polygraph tests are not admissible in any U.S. state as evidence.
Polygraph are basically just so the detectives can use the results to make the suspect panic & let their guard down & potentially lead them into confessing or opening up and saying more. If the suspect is a bit smarter & knows this then that tactic probably wouldn’t work
Polygraph tests are normally not admissible in court. There are some exceptions such as military tribunals, in normal court at the discretion of the Judge or if agreed to by both parties. - It does not matter whether she has "friends with benefits", the fact is he assumed the role of protector, she did not want him to be her protector, he is obviously trying to control what she does, where she lives and who she sees, speaks to, or allows to stay in her house - it is not his business, he has no claim to her. I don't understand what her lifestyle has anything to do with anything. The defence is that he should only get 10 years because of her age and ill health, that does not mean she's on drugs or an alcoholic. He killed her and should be in prison.
Daz they do them over here but mainly in south Yorkshire and essex apparently
Even if you’ve done nothing wrong, you shouldn’t talk to anybody without a lawyer.
In Japan, India and Indonesia, polygraph evidence is admissible in court. In the United States, most states permit polygraph test results to be used as evidence where parties have agreed to their admissibility before the examination is given, under the terms of a stipulation.
I really like watching your videos ❤ keep up the good work ❤❤❤❤❤
He died in prison in 2022. He would have been elegable for parole 3 yrs later
Sounds like she had normal dates but he wanted to make it sound like she was a streetwalker, which she wasn’t. She refused his advances & even reported them to the police!
Daz, your right. He wanted to admit it anyway. Most murderers do. That was why the officer used that technique. It works moody of the time. He got real close to him, acting like his friend, should no judgment, told him he was a good guy and whst he did was a mistake. It lowers their guard and give them an excuse to confessm they're not a bad person if it was an accident. However most of the time it isn't an accident they just hope everyone believes that it was.
14:30 they told him that they are searching his house and found stuff, and telling him he failed the poly is just a bluff. they want him to think its all over so he will just say fuck it and confess
Polygraph tests aren’t used in court but it gives the detectives something to go on. People take them because they think they can beat them. Even if you’re nervous the test will show you answer your control questions correctly. If you can answer those questions and it doesn’t show you’re lying then you should be able to answer all questions without lying if you’re innocent. Also don’t forget that cops are allowed to lie to you to get your confession.
I'm with you Gaynor, I think polygraph tests are a waste of time.
It tricks stupid people into admitting the crime. Like what this bozo did.
You guys should react to “MLB Players try Korean Baseball Stadium Food for the first time” on Korean Englishman.
I just love how watching a video about a man slipping up during a police interview makes your mind go to Korean baseball stadium food. lol 😂
I'd never take a polygraph no matter what they were asking me about. Overall they probably work well, but they can give false positives. Stick to the evidence. Aside from that, I'm skeptical that many cops eliminate a suspect based primarily on a polygraph result, anyway.
Friends with detriments.
I want to know: is it Gayna, or Gaynor? I've seen comments of both, but being American, i can't tell with the brits a's & r's. 😅❤
it's gaynor, it's just the British pronunciation with words that end in R..
literally in the description in multiple videos bud.
Like Gloria Gaynor 😂👍🏻
@@officeblokedaz 🤣🤣🤣 see? That doesn't help! 😂😂🥰
@Vendrix86 1st, I'm not a "bud". My name is literally "mom..." on here. 😅😅 2nd, it's an honest question. It's hard to tell what's a brit a or r for Americans. 🤷♀️ & I rarely look at descriptions, just probably should. 😉🙃
Polygraph tests are just refined heart rate trackers lol, not proof at all for any crime imo.
I think he blew it in the first interview. He said he dumped her trash then returned to her house then texted the next morning.
The detective knew exactly what he was doing and was in control the whole time. The use of the polygraph is standard police technique. It is not used to prove innocence or guilt but as a catalyst to further the investigation. It worked. Well done, Springfield MO detective.
Gay must still be watching old Detective series. With cameras everywhere today, you're not going to get away with anything. Besides, these detectives today as so much better trained than in the past, they know exactly what they're doing.
They play the role of friend/understanding..ohh..I know you're a good man this isn't how you are but something happened..
Many will confess..
They'll tell you you need to get it off your chest cause God knows what you did.. things like that.
Anyone hear the police read him his rights?
I mean before telling him about the warrants and crime scene technicians and building up his anxiety
What? It's a cut up video.
I always wanted to be a psychologist too. Turns out I need to be on the other side of the couch lol
Gaynor, if you haven't read the book Mindhunter by John Douglas, I highly recommend it. John was one of the best, if not the best, criminal profilers in the early days of profiling. It's fascinating to know how a criminal like a serial killer thinks. He could even tell what color car a criminal drove!
So much of that book has been debunked haha, including the color of one’s car, there’s only a limited amount of colors.
@aj897 You're talking about the show. I'm talking about the book long before the show. I've never even seen the show, but I imagine after a while they'd have to add some embellishments or something. You don't have to with a book.
First 🎉
Second! :)
I will never understand why interrogation rooms have the shittiest camera and mic. It seems like it should be the place with the best quality equipment.