The first test sample is definitely not a Chinese military belt, It might just be cosplay gear for enthusiasts. Chinese military belts are made of nylon material, have a very obvious star, and also contain the "八一" symbol inside.
I searched the cover image of the video on China's largest shopping website and found the origin of the belt. It is a belt used by military enthusiasts, and it is a very cheap type, worth 7 RMB (less than one US dollar) and the postage is included. I despise the author for the fake content of the video!
This was my first thougt too, not only for the Britain belt. You can use the belt material as a rowimg rope. My job profession learnt mor than 50 years ago was material tester in a physical lab, performimg tensile tests a lot. For me a lot of these YT test are absolute nonsense, with not added value for the use of the product and the requested performace, reliability. Here the same, the belte are by nature far ahead in resistance to their buckels.
You joke but a long time ago in Iraq we had a crappy Hummer break down and our choice was to wait around for many hours, OR, rig a way to tow it. Turns out that a Blackhawk riggers belt WILL tow a giant pile of gov't crap before mortar rounds start being walked into you.
Agree, It is pointless without the buckle. But... Would you be OK with that thing caught on something moving and NOT parting? This is why I refuse to put an office lanyard around my head!
That's true, only if you consider a belt to be a single purpose bit of kit. In a bad situation one should be inventive and a belt can be used for more than just holding up one's pants and other bits of kit.
let me take a guess - all the modern ones are produced in china by the exact same company but from different product lines. they suits different purposes. just like the arresting cables in uss carriers (imported from china)
Your experiments were interesting. Comforting to know that the world military will not be loosing their pants. I don't understand the logic in these belt designs; why design belts with super-strength belt strap material when the buckle, especially the plastic-clip type, will fail way before mildly stretching the belt fabric.However there may be other uses of the strap material that I am unaware.
The heavy duty two layer nylon web with an internal stiffening core is used because - warfighting equipment is HEAVY. These are not trouser belts for keeping your pants up or shirt tucked. These are designed to be used in conjunction with load bearing suspenders to carry gear on. Ammo, canteens, e tools, gas masks, ruck sacks, etc. If the belt isn't strong and stiff - the edge will roll and the equipment hung on it will flop around. That's why. And the latest designs pair a cobra style climbing harness buckle, and fall rated webbing, with a carabiner loop sewn in - which can be used for an emergency rappel if needed.
@@stinkyfungus To add onto that, these belts are meant to be used for a variety of other tasks in emergency situations, like pulling a wounded comrade out of combat, or as a handle to carry/pull heavy objects. So they need to be as strong and durable as possible
@@stinkyfungus Dr_piFrog has a valid point. The belts are way stronger then they need to be. The buckles are a week point. I suspect that it is why the person who tested them did not actually used the buckles to hold them in place. And there is another issue with one specific buckle design -the one used on the old US one. I haven't used one of those but modern ones with those little hooks that interlock are prone to open themselves with an accidental tap on them.
@@olligesd9343 the seventies werent that long ago if you think about it your only in your late 40s early to mid 50s. (Dont get mad im not trying to be mean im saying that it isnt that long ago).
Yeah, we can figure out two things from this video. 1. The maker is not from the US. Probably British since he went ham on the British belt. 2. Apparently wherever he is in Europe, they don’t have any surplus stores with current gear. And he clearly doesn’t know the value of a couple of those belts here in the US. Surplus stores would actually pay a decent amount of money for Cold War era Soviet or NATO gear. I will gladly send him an extra belt if he needs a current US Army issued belt.
Bro maybe you could test climbing harnesses or other gear like that (descenders, fall arresters, energu absorber or other). How much force can they withstand before they break. Comparison of different producers.
There was another U.S. belt between the old metal buckle & that plastic one you showed. It was also a plastic buckle, but latched differently. I had all 3 styles when I was in & liked the newest version best. A lot of guys really liked the metal ones though.
i wonder what happens if he tests the german variants the new stuff often does not have the best reputation when it comes to reliability and in old times germany was obsessed with overbuilding stuff
Not really - things deteriorate - China crap much faster than most others. I live in the Philippines, they send their sh!t here. EVERY electrical / electronic item is taken out of the box, first to make sure everything is there, and then plugged in, except refrigerators. That included 65" TVs. 20,000 hour light bulbs? KMA
@@Loverboy6027 The thing is when your life depends on stuff being serviceable YEARS after it's made, "strong enough" is not enough. Chu Lai 68, some of equipment was from Korean War. I live in the Philippines, their crap, even labeled"SS" rusts in a few months.
Moral of the story: if your belt is caught by something heavy dragging you along with it into the water and it's not made by the Chinese, you're pretty much done for 😂
I would kinda perfer a thinner style of belt that could double as a tourniquet, even if its just a little tear away patch on the belt. Not in any miltary so have no horse in the race.
If you were in the military, you would want a wide, stiff belt suitable for attaching your equipment and ammo to without the belt rolling or twisting. It's not to hold your pants up or to be used as a tourniquet, for which a bootlace, or a torn off strip of cloth would suffice.
Interesting well done test! It would have been good if you had also tested the Polish and both West and East German web belts. Especially the last East German NVA UTV belt.
'Russian old' (Soviet) belt is a bad belt made of synthetic materials. They were worn only by recruits and young soldiers. Old-timers wore completely different belts. They were made of genuine leather, soft and very strong. :)
The shorter you tie the belt, the more weight it will carry. The test is largely unstandardized. If each belt were tested equally long, the test would be more meaningful.
British, American and Russian belts are indeed very strong, but I can't think of any realistic scenario under which a belt needs to withstand more than 500㎏ of tension.😅
Soldier 1: I have participated in conflicts against several different countries. Out of all of them I have taken only one belt from someone I killed. Soldier 2: Why would you do that? Soldier 1: You would never understand.
I doubt the authenticity of this video clip about "Chinese military belts" because the old and new Russian belts that follow have the complete state of the belts before the test, but this Chinese belt does not. What kind of Chinese belt is this? Don't tell me that you used a cheap tactical belt used by military enthusiasts to impersonate a Chinese belt for testing!
I searched the cover image of the video on China's largest shopping website and found the origin of the belt. It is a belt used by military enthusiasts, and it is a very cheap type, worth 7 RMB (less than one US dollar) and the postage is included. I despise the author for the fake content of the video!😠
You don't use yours for a tow strap for getting your Army Jeep out of a mud hole? So much for improvise, adapt and overcome. Sure, let the motor club come and pull you out with a winch.
@@Colorado_Native "You don't use yours for a tow strap for getting your Army Jeep out of a mud hole? " No, because... A) An army jeep carries it's own set of tools for towing B) Not even the strongest of these belts are strong enough to pull a stuck jeep out of mud (jeep = four wheel drive, they only get stuck in the really, *really* bad stuff) C) You'd need to tie twenty of these belts together to be long enough for towing anything.
@vinny142 "Ah say, ah say, it was a joke, a joke man." BTW, the Army, nor any of the services, use Jeeps any more, except for a three-door J8 LPV - Light Patrol Vehicle. They were replaced a long time ago. Also, the word 'it's' that you used should be 'its' since it is a possessive term. I have owned several four-wheel drive vehicles, including Jeeps, and currently own a Jeep. I am very familiar with their capabilities. Go look at the off-road trails near Telluride, Colorado, and see where we go. One last thing, not every vehicle the military has carries a full complement of recovery tools. I am retired military and have been out with the Marines in some horrible places. But, thanks for the reply.
99,9% of soldier work in war theater is not fighting but surviving. Since we are human we need tools and be able to improvise with what we have. Since the belt is something you always have and it is handy for numerous things, you want it to be reliable even if compromised. It can be used as improvised handle, load bearer or drag line, fishing or hunting aid, animal control (leash or tether), improvised stretcher handle, shelter construction, climbing aid or to secure gear on vehicle or backpack. Or simply for anything you just need. So quality gear is important as long as you need your soldiers to live in war theater and not just pumping them there to die.
Not sure how this test proves anything. It's a belt not a lifting strap. I bet the weaker is a heck of a lot more comfortable than one as strong as a lifting strap.
He was testing the material strength not the fittings, not surprised at the result as we overdo most things, like has been said would make excellent tow rope
I would have preferred seeing how they held up using the buckles. But anyway, what's the point? All will do. I mean, who's gonna carry that weight or use it to lift tanks?
I always love seeing CHP videos, but I'm sure all of these belts are strong enough for their intended use. The weak point will be the buckles. The main question is how I can convince my wife that I need one of these crazy hydraulic presses?
From my experience with the dog's harness, you should really be testing those belts with their buckles. Plastic buckles seem fragile and my dog has broken some of the cast metal links.
The Russian belt is the best. Its metal buckle is very durable and it is the only one that makes it easy to tie a prisoner or connect several straps into a long cord.
If they weren't, they wouldn't cost the taxpayers so much. It's like the old one about the price of a hammer for the US Air Force at $75. They didn't call it a hammer though, they called it an "impact imparting device".
The first test sample is definitely not a Chinese military belt, It might just be cosplay gear for enthusiasts. Chinese military belts are made of nylon material, have a very obvious star, and also contain the "八一" symbol inside.
I searched the cover image of the video on China's largest shopping website and found the origin of the belt. It is a belt used by military enthusiasts, and it is a very cheap type, worth 7 RMB (less than one US dollar) and the postage is included. I despise the author for the fake content of the video!
@@alxvideos6634probably it is the only Chinese belt he could get?
There is no doubt that the US military's belts should cost thousands of dollars each.😂
@@alxvideos6634 In these comparison videos, they always use the cheapest Chinese brands to compare to the most expensive brands from other countries.
I just did the same test, except I used Thanksgiving dinner instead of the hydraulic press
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The testing method is very problematic. It is not a real test at all. There are big problems with the fixation.
Bro, you are a genius
the brits must have really heavy trousers.
They make their belts out of tow straps.
it is not the trousers that are heavyn it's wat is inside the trousers.
Haha improvise, overcome and adapt as the saying goes in the Brit Army 😂@@jayrowe6473
@@paulvanderhaegen761 The Bull Sh%t?
It's there so their pants don't get dragged down by the amount of shit they release @@paulvanderhaegen761
I have no idea what the point was to test belts like this, but I did watch the whole video and found it interesting. Good job.
I actually watched it all. I now know once my Land Rover getS stuck to get my genuine British Army belt off my trousers
This was my first thougt too, not only for the Britain belt. You can use the belt material as a rowimg rope. My job profession learnt mor than 50 years ago was material tester in a physical lab, performimg tensile tests a lot. For me a lot of these YT test are absolute nonsense, with not added value for the use of the product and the requested performace, reliability. Here the same, the belte are by nature far ahead in resistance to their buckels.
The testing method is very problematic. It is not a real test at all. There are big problems with the fixation.
You joke but a long time ago in Iraq we had a crappy Hummer break down and our choice was to wait around for many hours, OR, rig a way to tow it. Turns out that a Blackhawk riggers belt WILL tow a giant pile of gov't crap before mortar rounds start being walked into you.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
3:22 u have to test the mechanicsm that holds the belt together normally (clamps and connectors)
thats in most cases the first thing that will break
Agree, It is pointless without the buckle. But... Would you be OK with that thing caught on something moving and NOT parting? This is why I refuse to put an office lanyard around my head!
The testing method is very problematic. It is not a real test at all. There are big problems with the fixation.
Any country in the world just needs to make a belt that can carry 150kg max. Beyond that, the back of the soldier will be broken before the belt does.
That's true, only if you consider a belt to be a single purpose bit of kit. In a bad situation one should be inventive and a belt can be used for more than just holding up one's pants and other bits of kit.
China speaking?
True, but a wide stiff belt is good to hang relatively heavy things from without it collapsing.
But the belt needs to carry that 150Kg, over and over again, for years at a time. And it must resist abrasion, fatigue and stretching.
@@newdefsys do u really need the belt to hold 1000kg+.......?
deadlift world champion is VERY far from lifting1000kg......
let me take a guess - all the modern ones are produced in china by the exact same company but from different product lines. they suits different purposes. just like the arresting cables in uss carriers (imported from china)
The Chinese can make anything. Just give them the specifications.
@@freenational So does the Americans, just give them enough money.
@@madeinchina1450 that's the matter, a bag of screws for 100,000 dollars on the list for the original price less than 100 dollars buying from China.
As a Chinese military man with decades of service, I've never seen this belt before; the genuine one looks similar to Russia's new-style belt.
The first Chinese waistband, I didn't even know what it was when I was in the military for over twenty years...🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
yeh，hhh，i think its just work for cosplayer
Cope harder bot
@@Superpooper-2020 anti Trump CIA bot
Lol and you are 19 yo
Your experiments were interesting. Comforting to know that the world military will not be loosing their pants. I don't understand the logic in these belt designs; why design belts with super-strength belt strap material when the buckle, especially the plastic-clip type, will fail way before mildly stretching the belt fabric.However there may be other uses of the strap material that I am unaware.
The heavy duty two layer nylon web with an internal stiffening core is used because - warfighting equipment is HEAVY.
These are not trouser belts for keeping your pants up or shirt tucked.
These are designed to be used in conjunction with load bearing suspenders to carry gear on. Ammo, canteens, e tools, gas masks, ruck sacks, etc.
If the belt isn't strong and stiff - the edge will roll and the equipment hung on it will flop around.
That's why.
And the latest designs pair a cobra style climbing harness buckle, and fall rated webbing, with a carabiner loop sewn in - which can be used for an emergency rappel if needed.
@@stinkyfungus Thanks for the explanation, good.
@@stinkyfungus To add onto that, these belts are meant to be used for a variety of other tasks in emergency situations, like pulling a wounded comrade out of combat, or as a handle to carry/pull heavy objects. So they need to be as strong and durable as possible
@@stinkyfungus Dr_piFrog has a valid point. The belts are way stronger then they need to be. The buckles are a week point. I suspect that it is why the person who tested them did not actually used the buckles to hold them in place. And there is another issue with one specific buckle design -the one used on the old US one. I haven't used one of those but modern ones with those little hooks that interlock are prone to open themselves with an accidental tap on them.
Losing*
That US belt isn't at all new, they haven't issued those in over 20 years.
Yeah, that was an ALICE belt from the early 70's
So is that old Soviet belt
@@olligesd9343 the seventies werent that long ago if you think about it your only in your late 40s early to mid 50s.
(Dont get mad im not trying to be mean im saying that it isnt that long ago).
@@Bob-and-Robs-asylum if you were born in the 70s. the guys who were issued these are like 70 now
Yeah, we can figure out two things from this video.
1. The maker is not from the US. Probably British since he went ham on the British belt.
2. Apparently wherever he is in Europe, they don’t have any surplus stores with current gear. And he clearly doesn’t know the value of a couple of those belts here in the US. Surplus stores would actually pay a decent amount of money for Cold War era Soviet or NATO gear.
I will gladly send him an extra belt if he needs a current US Army issued belt.
At 5:55 you can see that the piston goes down and has no contact. But the digital display rises. LOL that's funny
Bro maybe you could test climbing harnesses or other gear like that (descenders, fall arresters, energu absorber or other). How much force can they withstand before they break. Comparison of different producers.
Why are we testing the webbing and not the buckles.
Obviously the person who tested wasn't in army and don't know that buckle is weak point, webbing is irrelevant 😅
There was another U.S. belt between the old metal buckle & that plastic one you showed. It was also a plastic buckle, but latched differently. I had all 3 styles when I was in & liked the newest version best. A lot of guys really liked the metal ones though.
All made in China 🤨
😂😂😂
No if it is military they make there own
Just like America having different helmets than china
Sem galantia🤣🤣🤣🤣
Didn’t notice any national stock numbers on the new US one. So it’s probably a knock off look alike.
INCOMING!!! Quick, get behind your belts!!!😂😂😂
This is one of those few ones where the newer ones perform better than the old ones (supposing the age wasn't a big factor).
i wonder what happens if he tests the german variants
the new stuff often does not have the best reputation when it comes to reliability
and in old times germany was obsessed with overbuilding stuff
Age is a factor, material gets brittle and degrates.
Nylon is definitely stronger than cotton.
The testing method is very problematic. It is not a real test at all. There are big problems with the fixation...
The last test started reading before the press even moved😂
Forgot to zero it?
the press haven't touch the buttom bar already read 3400, the entire test is fake😅
Why was the pressure on the 2nd UK attempt going up even before the hydraulic press was turned on?
Coz Brits are hardcore so does to their belt.
Test the clamps!
3:16 I never expected to hear Rammstein in one of your videos 😂🤣
Beste Grüße aus Deutschland 😉
What I want to know is, wtf Britain planning to do with them belts?
Protecting their troops from wedgies....😂
As someone in the comments alluded to, towing straps maybe 🤣
They give the hardest spanking in the world.
坦克拖车很贵的 但几十条腰带跟劳力却很便宜😅
@@garethpothin1498 For a tank?
Would you please test the complete belts incl. its buckle.
When you have a hydraulic press, the only thing surviving in the house is that press.😂
5:50 --- 5:58 hehehe You should have your hydraulic press calibrated. The last test started reading before the press even moved.
Tow rope is one MacGyver - but again the buckle is more critical - especially when attaching several together
Nah which ratchet straps from which brands can withstamd the most wieght.
Summit vs. Jegs
So the belt of china is strong enough. Thats smart
Not really - things deteriorate - China crap much faster than most others. I live in the Philippines, they send their sh!t here. EVERY electrical / electronic item is taken out of the box, first to make sure everything is there, and then plugged in, except refrigerators. That included 65" TVs. 20,000 hour light bulbs? KMA
Exactly.I have one and it's ok for me.
I'd go with the US made one
@@Loverboy6027 The thing is when your life depends on stuff being serviceable YEARS after it's made, "strong enough" is not enough. Chu Lai 68, some of equipment was from Korean War. I live in the Philippines, their crap, even labeled"SS" rusts in a few months.
3:22 when you make a two ton plus holding belt with plastic buckles
2:12 This one is not US belt, it looks more like a UK belt.
Correct, it is a British 58 pattern belt.
Looks like a 58 pattern
Correct. The U.S. version was very similar, but had a different clasp.
I’d imagine that the American ones are designed to hold in all the super sized happy meals 🤣
That's how the British army is held together.
The belt from England didn't break but the hidrolic machine did 😂😂
So, if need be, you can pull a Humvee with them. An interesting video. Thanks!
Had to do that many years ago in Iraq, a blackhawk riggers belt earned much praise that day!
Moral of the story: if your belt is caught by something heavy dragging you along with it into the water and it's not made by the Chinese, you're pretty much done for 😂
Perhaps all made in China
The testing method is very problematic. It is not a real test at all. There are big problems with the fixation.,,
Terrible situation! A belt should be engineered to break under a 10kg load.
The Brits' belts were not just for holding up trousers. They were made to pull heavy loads if needed.
Yeh like Challenger tank hulks from battlefields LoL
Congratulations , they all passed admirably. 😊
Glad I got this feed , clicked & subscribed.
I would kinda perfer a thinner style of belt that could double as a tourniquet, even if its just a little tear away patch on the belt. Not in any miltary so have no horse in the race.
If you were in the military, you would want a wide, stiff belt suitable for attaching your equipment and ammo to without the belt rolling or twisting. It's not to hold your pants up or to be used as a tourniquet, for which a bootlace, or a torn off strip of cloth would suffice.
@@jaygee5693 Makes sense I posted this late at night, thought about it the next day and realized its more for attaching gear then a belt.
useful, especially when you have to pull out a tank from the swamp
Interesting well done test!
It would have been good if you had also tested the Polish and both West and East German web belts. Especially the last East German NVA UTV belt.
These test are irrelevant, unless of course you intend to pull an Abrams out of a shell hole with your belt.
You could with the British belt.. :D
'Russian old' (Soviet) belt is a bad belt made of synthetic materials. They were worn only by recruits and young soldiers. Old-timers wore completely different belts. They were made of genuine leather, soft and very strong. :)
After careful research, I found that they are all made in China, but the prices are different.😂😂😂😂😂😂
Nice, thank you for the summary at the end of the video...
Okay, what are our friends on the other side of The Pond doing with these belts? 🤔😂😂
下次测试一下，这些腰带的扣子，他们应该是首先损坏的。
重要性是？？？
@@davidzhang5600 战术腰带主要材料基本都是尼龙为主，承受力都太够用了，主要是扣子，在实际用的时候扣子要能保证牢固和快拆，如果很牢固但是不能快拆也是很糟糕的。
@@colinren9908 受教了!謝謝! 太過堅固也許是爲了萬一之需。
@@colinren9908 解释·的好！
Wow, that british modern belt is impressive.
The shorter you tie the belt, the more weight it will carry. The test is largely unstandardized. If each belt were tested equally long, the test would be more meaningful.
that was great!
British, American and Russian belts are indeed very strong, but I can't think of any realistic scenario under which a belt needs to withstand more than 500㎏ of tension.😅
Great stuff thanks
"says something randomly patriotic and invoking the British Empire"
Rue Brittania, Brittania rules the world.
Yeah, a belt made in China...
Soldier 1: I have participated in conflicts against several different countries. Out of all of them I have taken only one belt from someone I killed.
Soldier 2: Why would you do that?
Soldier 1: You would never understand.
I doubt the authenticity of this video clip about "Chinese military belts" because the old and new Russian belts that follow have the complete state of the belts before the test, but this Chinese belt does not. What kind of Chinese belt is this? Don't tell me that you used a cheap tactical belt used by military enthusiasts to impersonate a Chinese belt for testing!
I searched the cover image of the video on China's largest shopping website and found the origin of the belt. It is a belt used by military enthusiasts, and it is a very cheap type, worth 7 RMB (less than one US dollar) and the postage is included. I despise the author for the fake content of the video!😠
The outcome is pretty much irrelevant. Noone is going to use those belts for anything other than keeping throuses up + some equipment.
You don't use yours for a tow strap for getting your Army Jeep out of a mud hole? So much for improvise, adapt and overcome. Sure, let the motor club come and pull you out with a winch.
You mean it isn’t a useful scientific experiment like all the other stuff these maniacs crushed in a hydraulic press?
@@Colorado_Native "You don't use yours for a tow strap for getting your Army Jeep out of a mud hole? "
No, because...
A) An army jeep carries it's own set of tools for towing
B) Not even the strongest of these belts are strong enough to pull a stuck jeep out of mud (jeep = four wheel drive, they only get stuck in the really, *really* bad stuff)
C) You'd need to tie twenty of these belts together to be long enough for towing anything.
@vinny142 "Ah say, ah say, it was a joke, a joke man." BTW, the Army, nor any of the services, use Jeeps any more, except for a three-door J8 LPV - Light Patrol Vehicle. They were replaced a long time ago. Also, the word 'it's' that you used should be 'its' since it is a possessive term. I have owned several four-wheel drive vehicles, including Jeeps, and currently own a Jeep. I am very familiar with their capabilities. Go look at the off-road trails near Telluride, Colorado, and see where we go. One last thing, not every vehicle the military has carries a full complement of recovery tools. I am retired military and have been out with the Marines in some horrible places. But, thanks for the reply.
99,9% of soldier work in war theater is not fighting but surviving. Since we are human we need tools and be able to improvise with what we have. Since the belt is something you always have and it is handy for numerous things, you want it to be reliable even if compromised. It can be used as improvised handle, load bearer or drag line, fishing or hunting aid, animal control (leash or tether), improvised stretcher handle, shelter construction, climbing aid or to secure gear on vehicle or backpack. Or simply for anything you just need. So quality gear is important as long as you need your soldiers to live in war theater and not just pumping them there to die.
Not sure how this test proves anything. It's a belt not a lifting strap. I bet the weaker is a heck of a lot more comfortable than one as strong as a lifting strap.
Oh, you gotta try those reflective PT belts! 😂 You will die if you don’t have your reflective PT belt!
I mean, they only really have to hold your pants up - and maybe a canteen and some ammo. So even the weakest belt tested would be more than adequate.
He was testing the material strength not the fittings, not surprised at the result as we overdo most things, like has been said would make excellent tow rope
Dude got the job everyone wanted as a kid, let's destroy stuff!
Next: Hydraulic press vs army man from different countries.
The United States has a lot of potbellied soldiers and police, so it needs 2,500 kilograms of belts😂
I would have preferred seeing how they held up using the buckles. But anyway, what's the point? All will do. I mean, who's gonna carry that weight or use it to lift tanks?
All of those buckles give out way before the belt does
Wow we make god tier belts.
Is there a big problem with belts breaking?
Pants will fall down. LOL
And the point of this is what exactly, how much pressure can be applied to a belt on a person?
There's no practical use for those results, it's just fun seeing things break.
I always love seeing CHP videos, but I'm sure all of these belts are strong enough for their intended use. The weak point will be the buckles. The main question is how I can convince my wife that I need one of these crazy hydraulic presses?
From my experience with the dog's harness, you should really be testing those belts with their buckles. Plastic buckles seem fragile and my dog has broken some of the cast metal links.
I’m not quite sure why I’d need a belt that tough to hold my pants up.
This reflects roughly the same difference in other areas.
I paused the video halfway through and said...."BRO....wtf are you doing with your life!"
So,they made tough belt to drag the tank?
The Russian belt is the best. Its metal buckle is very durable and it is the only one that makes it easy to tie a prisoner or connect several straps into a long cord.
Should test the groove belt
The belt you tested is not used by the Chinese army at all! It was bought at a roadside stall!
Of course, the question is how strong does a belt need to be?
You need to test the buckle that the fist to break in my trousers
American Hammers : Strong
British belts : Strong
Combined : 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
Вспомнился старый русский анекдот о качестве - Поп упал с колокольни -поп всмятку, а галоши остались! )))
502Kg is more than the heaviest soldier. Their pants are considerably lighter. We can conclude that all belts are grossly over-engineered.
If they weren't, they wouldn't cost the taxpayers so much. It's like the old one about the price of a hammer for the US Air Force at $75. They didn't call it a hammer though, they called it an "impact imparting device".
which one is the lightest?
Hey Admin ! Where are you from ?
The USA belt is designed to stand a trip to MacDonald’s with a full meal deal and double dessert
Can I point out CCR was not a WWII thing?
The GB test was inclusive since it didn't break, it was improperly secured both times,
What is the need of all that stringht?
But at what weight would a mans spine be obliterated 🤔
Odličan test.
surely unless you include the buckle in the test you're just testing the webbing?
It seems there is a negative proportional relationship between the belt strength and its war potential
Китайский ремень самый практичный. Или есть вероятность, что при помощи ремня будут вытаскивать танк из грязи?😅
Thank god, if 2 tanks try to tear me apart my US belt withstand 2500 kg pressure😂
在淘宝还是拼多多买的啊？
Rule Britannia, Britannia rule the waves! And trouser belts of course!!
next time you may test the tools with the same price
Any results about the weight of each belt? That matters.
wild how they'll have a strap that can handle like 2 tons and give it a fucking plastic snap buckle
insane, what's the purpose of this comparison? what does the quality of belt matter?
Chinese: Okay! 30 dollars from the UK, 20 dollars from the US, 10 dollars from China, what else do you want from Africa? 2 dollars from Africa!😊